crisis of identity and mimicry in orwell’s - usd … · crisis of identity and mimicry in...

CRISIS OF IDENTITY AND MIMICRY IN ORWELL’S

BURMESE DAYS AS SEEN THROUGH

THE CHARACTERIZATION OF A NATIVE CHARACTER

U PO KYIN: A POSTCOLONIAL READING

AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra

in English Letters

By

BONIFASIUS ENDO GAUH PERDANA

Student Number: 124214123

ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS

FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY

YOGYAKARTA 2016

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

ii

CRISIS OF IDENTITY AND MIMICRY IN ORWELL’S

BURMESE DAYS AS SEEN THROUGH

THE CHARACTERIZATION OF A NATIVE CHARACTER

U PO KYIN: A POSTCOLONIAL READING

AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra

in English Letters

By

BONIFASIUS ENDO GAUH PERDANA

Student Number: 124214123

ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMDEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS

FACULTY OF LETTERSSANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY

YOGYAKARTA2016


vii

All you needin this life is

ignoranceand confidence,

and then success is sure.

Mark Twain


viii

For those who question their identities


ix

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I have been talking too much about my thesis since last year. Yet, I finally

finish my thesis after a bundle of supports from relatives and friends. I was being

showered by endless blessings during the tiring, stressing, and doubtful process.

Therefore, I would like to express my very first gratitude to the God Almighty

whom I owe prayers every night.

I would also like to deliver my gratitude to my thesis advisor, Elisa Dwi

Wardani, S.S., M.Hum whom I regularly met when I lost my way during the

process. I could not imagine how I finish this thesis without her. I would also

thank A. B. Sri Mulyani, Ph.D. As my thesis co-advisor, she gave some

suggestions and helped me with the formatting of my thesis.

I consider my four years in English Letters Department of Sanata

University as a formation phase of my life. I learn many life lessons here in

Sanata Dharma University. Many ups and downs decorate my college life in the

campus. Those moments bring me more joys but sometimes sorrows. Hence, I

would like to thank the lectures and friends of my beloved department.

I dedicate my thesis to my parents who always lovingly care for me. Their

encouragements, love and prayers keep me going until I finally reach the finish

line. The smile on their faces are the happiness of my life.

Finally, I would like to thank my partner when working with this thesis, a

lover, Amanda Alexandra Tanne. She always wants to hear the updates of my

thesis and listens to my boastful complains. Those who are not mentioned, I

would like to thank you all.


x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE ........................................................................................................ iiAPPROVAL PAGE ............................................................................................. iiiACCEPTANCE PAGE.........................................................................................ivLEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAHUNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIK................................................................vSTATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ....................................................................viMOTTO PAGE .................................................................................................. viiiACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................ixTABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................xABSTRACT ...........................................................................................................xiABSTRAK............................................................................................................. xii

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .........................................................................1A. Background of the Study......................................................................1B. Problem Formulation............................................................................3C. Objectives of the Study ........................................................................4D. Definition of Terms..............................................................................5

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE .....................................................7A. Review of Related Studies ...................................................................7B. Review of Related Theories ...............................................................11C. Review of Related Backgrounds ........................................................18D. Theoretical Framework ......................................................................22

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY ...................................................................24A. Object of the Study ............................................................................24B. Approach of the Study........................................................................25C. Method of the Study...........................................................................27

CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS ................................................................................29A. Crisis of Identity Suffered by U Po Kyin...........................................29B. Crisis of Identity leads to Mimicry of U Po Kyin ..............................45

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION...........................................................................54BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................56


xi

ABSTRACT

BONIFASISUS ENDO GAUH PERDANA. CRISIS OF IDENTITY ANDMIMICRY IN ORWELL’S BURMESE DAYS AS SEEN THROUGH THECHARACTERIZATION OF A LOCAL NATIVE CHARACTER U POKYIN: A POSTCOLONIAL READING. Yogyakarta: Departement of EnglishLetters, Faculty of Letters, Sanata Dharma University, 2016

This study analyzes how crisis of identity and mimicry occurs in thepostcolonial discourse. A local native character whose name is U Po Kyin is thefocus of the study. As a native character, he holds a high ranking position for localin the British Raj in Burma. However, he is portrayed as a corrupt official as heaccepts bribes and denounces his rival. His ambition to get the membership, anelite European Club, drives him infuriated to destroy his rival’s reputation becausenaturally it is him who would be elected as the first local member of the Club. Atthe end of the novel, Kyin finally secures his membership but he fails to atone hisevil-doings by building pagodas as a Buddhist. Kyin’s attitude is seen as how hemanages to deal with his inferiority towards the British. He is also observed tomimic the British as his strategy to erase the idea of being colonized.

There are two problem formulations in this study. The first is to find outhow U Po Kyin suffers from crisis of identity through his characterization in thenovel. Then, the second objective is to understand how his crisis of identity leadshim to mimic the British.

This study is a library research. The primary source of this study is a novelby George Orwell entitled Burmese Days. Some books, journals and articlesrelated to this study are also used. Postcolonial approach is used in this thesis.There are two steps of doing this study. First is arranging some theories andstudies related to this study. The theories used in this study are theory ofcharacterization and postcolonial theories. Theory of crisis of identity byRutherford and also Ashcroft and mimicry by Bhabha are the main theories usedin this study. Then, the second step is to answer the problem formulations byanalyzing the novel using selected theories above.

This study finds that U Po Kyin suffers from crisis of identity. He isoppressed conscious and unconsciously by the British. This causes his self-imageto be eroded. Even though he is relatively wealthier than his fellow natives, hestill craves for more as he realizes that there is something more than money. Hewants to be detached from his inferiority. The elite European Club represents hisambition because it offers him status to be like the British. That is why heschemes to crush his rival. In his schemes, denigrating his rival means to mimicthe British because he needs to differ himself from the natives. However, he isstill powerless because the British still consider him as the subject ofcolonialization.


xii

ABSTRAK

BONIFASISUS ENDO GAUH PERDANA. CRISIS OF IDENTITY ANDMIMICRY IN ORWELL’S BURMESE DAYS AS SEEN THROUGH THECHARACTERIZATION OF A LOCAL NATIVE CHARACTER U POKYIN: A POSTCOLONIAL READING. Yogyakarta: Program Studi SastraInggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2016.

Studi ini menganalisis terjadinya krisis identitas and mimikri dalamwacana poskonialisme. Fokus studi ini adalah seorang karakter lokal bernama UPo Kyin. Meskipun Kyin merupakan seorang karakter lokal, tetapi dia mempunyaijabatan yang tinggi dalam pemerintahan kolonial di Burma sebagai seorang hakimpengadilan rendah. Kyin digambarkan sebagai pejabat yang korup. Dia sangatberambisi untuk mendapatkan keanggotan the Club. The Club merupakan sebuahklub elit milik pemerintahan kolonial Inggris. Oleh karena itu, dia inginmenghancurkan reputasi seorang dokter untuk mendapatkan keanggotaan theClub. Pada akhir cerita dalam novel, Kyin akhirnya berhasil mendapatkankeanggotannya. Akan tetapi, dia gagal menebus dosa-dosanya denganmembangun pagoda sesuai dengan ajaran Buddha. Sikap Kyin tersebutmenunjukan caranya untuk menghilangkan inferioritasnya terhadap Inggris. Kyinjuga melakukan mimikri terhadap Inggris sebagai strateginya untukmenghilangkan status keterjajahannya.

Ada dua rumusan masalah dalam studi ini. Yang pertama adalah untukmengetahui bagaimana Kyin menderita krisis identitas melalui karakterisasinya didalam novel. Kemudian, yang kedua adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana krisisidentitas memperngaruhinya untuk melakukan mimikri terhadap orang Inggris.

Studi ini adalah studi pustaka. Sumber utama studi ini adalah novelGeorge Orwell yang berjudul Burmese Days. Sumber terkait lainnya berupa buku,jurnal dan artikel juga digunakan. Ada dua langkah yang dilakukan untukmenyelesaikan studi ini. Yang pertama adalah mengumpulkan studi-studi danteori terkait. Teori yang digunakan adalah teori karakterisasi dan teoriposkolonialisme. Teori poskolonialisme yang digunakan adalah krisis identitasoleh Rutherford dan juga Ashcroft dan wacana mimikri oleh Bhabha. Langkahyang kedua adalah menjelaskan semua rumusan masalah dengan menganalisanovel dengan teori-teori di atas.

Hasil dari studi ini adalah penjelasan bagaimana U Po Kyin menderitakrisis identitas. Dia tertekan secara sadar dan tidak sadar oleh pemerintah kolonialInggris. Hal ini menyebabkan citra dirinya tergerus. Walaupun dia cukup kaya diantara warga lokal lainnya, dia masih menginginkan hal yang lebih besar dariuang semata. Ambisinya tersebut direpresentasikan oleh the Club karena the Clubdapat memberikannya status seperti orang Inggris. Jadi, sangat penting bagi Kyinuntuk menghancurkan reputasi rivalnya. Upaya untuk menghancurkan reputasirivalnya merupakan strategi mimikri Kyin untuk membedakan dirinya dari wargalokal lainnya. Akan tetapi, Inggris tetap menganggapnya sebagai subjek yangterjajah.


1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Study

The writer chooses George Orwell’s Burmese Days to study because it

represents the situations of South East Asian nations as most of them were

colonized. Colonized nations share certain characteristics in common as

proposed by Loomba “Colonialism … reshapes, often violently, physical

territories, social terrains as well as human identities” (Loomba, 2005:155). In

Southeast Asia, there were at least three colonial nations that gained control

over nations in the region and made them into their colonies (Wiharyanto,

2005:113). They were British that ruled in Malaysia, Singapore and Myanmar,

French that ruled in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, Spanish ruled in the

Philippines and Dutch ruled in Indonesia. Upon a series of agreement between

the colonials, Thailand was left free politically but controlled economically.

Thus, almost all countries in Southeast Asia were colonized. It is presupposed

that they share the same spirit to be free from imperialism. The novel is also

believed to depict a complete situation where the colonial regime oppressed

the native.

However, the colonial government, especially British colonial government

in Burma, somewhat tries to provide the native more space in their elite

community as they let natives hold lower rankings officials. In another view,

sometimes natives admire the British colonial government as they take into

account that imperialism brought enlightenment to the people. In the novel, an


2

example can be seen from one of native characters, an Indian-born, Dr.

Veraswami who praises the English imperialism because he believes it is the

Englishmen who bring his people to be civilized and educated though they

have always been treated as ‘the other’ (Orwell, 1934:40).

Another reason why the writer chooses Orwell’s piece to study is because

he is known as a writer, essayist as well as journalist who explicitly addresses

and expresses his political issues in his work s. In his opus magnum, 1984 and

Animal Farm, Orwell criticizes satirically a totalitarian government and its

instruments. Homage to Catalonia was written after he had taken part in

Spanish Civil War (Lee, 1969:819). These show that his life experiences

apparently influenced his works in many ways. Hence, he even utilized those

experiences as backgrounds and argumentations for him to write a literary

work including Burmese Days.

Orwell was a police officer in Burma who later resigned from Indian

Police (British Police force stationed in British Raj in India and Burma) in

1928(Rai, 1983:49). This can be seen as a sign of his rejection of imperialism.

He wrote Burmese Days afterwards but worried upon the publication, as it

would disrupt British Office in India (Rai, 1983:49). He proclaimed himself as

the one who concerned about Burmese people as he stated in one of his

essays, Shooting an Elephant “Theoretically – and secretly, of course - I was

all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British” (Orwell,

1936). Years after that, he finally published the novel in 1942. Orwell’s

attitude implies on one of his characters in the novel, John Flory who spends


3

most of his time in the colonized country, Burma. Flory is pictured as the

friendliest and loved by the native as he respects their culture and traditions.

This can be taken as representation of Orwell’s personal statement towards

British imperialism in Burma which was unlike most of his colleagues.

The focus of this study is the identity issue. The image of self that is

destroyed because of colonialization is a sign of cultural denigration.

Therefore, the colonized people see themselves as inferior than the colonizer.

This can be seen from the native characters who pursue their dreams to be

‘united’ or as if having close relationship with one of the Europeans (Orwell,

1950:15). The locals are longing for identity that would establish their status

in the community as portrayed by U Po Kyin, a local magistrate who devises a

plan to be the first local member in an expatriate community by all means.

The pursuit of being West, the British imperialism which most the Orient,

those who were colonized, aim to have, according Bhabha, is “a dream of the

deprived, the illusion of the powerless” (Bhabha, 2004: xi).

B. Problem Formulation

This study answers the following questions:

1. How does U Po Kyin suffer from identity crisis as seen through the

characterization in Orwell’s Burmese Days?

2. How does his crisis of identity lead to the process of mimicry in

Orwell’s Burmese Days?


4

C. Objectives of the Study

This study discusses identity issue in Orwell’s Burmese Days that occurs

in the native character U Po Kyin. U Po Kyin is portrayed as a corrupt official

in this novel. As he pursues his ambition to be elected in the British Club in

Kyauktada, he continues to make plans to compete deceitfully with his fellow,

an Indian-born native, Dr. Veraswami. Dr. Veraswami who is known to have a

close relationship with the main character, a British, John Flory. Having the

fact that Dr. Veraswami is more likely to be elected, U Po Kyin begins to

destroy the doctor’s reputation by producing lies and evil plans. When he

finally achieves his dream, he is not treated the same like the member of the

club because other members, the British, do not want to be equal with local in

any possible ways. He suffers from crisis of identity as he complains about his

conditions. Even though, he is a local magistrate who has a better situation in

terms of wealth and social status. Thus, this study has two objectives. The first

objective is to identify his crisis of identity in the novel by examining

characterization of Kyin. The second objective is to find how the identity crisis

leads him to mimic the colonizer, the British. He seems to have the intention to

be like the British in terms of wealth and respect but he himself fails to realize

his inferiority in the British colonialism. He is still trapped in the wheel of

colonialism because his status remains as the colonial subject. This is the result

of his mimicry because mimicry is only a form of repetition not representation.


5

D. Definitions of Terms

1. Crisis of Identity

Rutherford uses ‘desert’ as a metaphor for crisis of identity. Desert

symbolizes otherness and sense of strangeness. It also symbolizes as a margin

between habitable and inhabitable areas. He comments on Lawrence of Arabia

who is a white man but has lived in Arab for years. Lawrence begins

questioning himself that he has quitted his English self but yet to acquire a

new identity as an Arab because in the West concept being an Arab is a

complete uncanny (Rutherford, 1990:9).

Identities are formed between the relations of power. The distribution of

power is seen from bipolarity of relation, black/white, masculine/feminine,

colonializer/colonized and others (Rutherford, 1990:9). One is dominant and

the other is subordinate. However, as illustrated earlier, desert symbolizes the

margin, it also represents sex, race and culture. Therefore, when confronted in

the margin, it is where someone starts to question his identity.

Ashcroft offers the term of place and displacement to picture crisis of

identity. “The conscious or unconscious oppression of the indigenous

personality and culture by a supposedly superior racial or cultural model”

(Ashcroft, 2002:9) causes the image of self to be eroded. This triggers them to

experience alienation and crisis where he called it as a result of displacement.

Another sign to obverse crisis of identity is a tendency to seek and practice

‘Englishness’.


6

2. Mimicry

Mimicry is a complex strategy of the Other who seek to reform. As a

process, mimicry is a sign of disavowal because it does not represent power

but only repetition (Bhabha, 2004:123). However, mimicry threats both of

colonizer and colonized. For the colonizer, mimicry will disrupt its exercise of

power because the ambivalence effect of mimicry. The result of mimicry is

‘almost the same, but not quite’ (Bhabha, 2004:123). Therefore, the

ambivalence of mimicry is a sign of turbulence of colonial practice as many

start to imitate their way of thinking. Thus, it would disrupt the colonial

government because there are some local natives who are educated and ready

to criticize them. For the colonized, mimicry is an attempt to denigrate the

indigenous culture.

3. Native

According to Ashcroft, the term native is “the indigenous inhabitants of

colonies has a long and chequered history.” (Ashcroft, 2007:142). The root of

this term is associated with those who were born in the land. However, in the

colonialization context, this term carries a meaning to indicate that native is

“regarded as inferior to the colonial settlers or the colonial administrators who

ruled the colonies.” (Ashcroft, 2007:142).


7

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

A. Review of Related Studies

Burmese Days is believed to be written based on life experience of George

Orwell stationed in Burma (Myanmar) as a British officer. Orwell is

considered as a social critic rather than novelist as his works, including the

most praised 1984 and Animal Farm, are presented in clarity of details. Thus,

many said that his works are on the border of fiction and non-fiction (Lee,

1969:819). Orwell himself proclaims that he was more intended to write a

novel that has unhappy endings but speaking details description and similes

for the sake of their sounds (Orwell, 1946). He then categorized Burmese

Days as one of his works where he applied the technique. Orwell creates a

space for simile or satire to exist to criticize British imperialism especially in

India Raj where spent 10 years as a police officer. Thus, it is assumed that his

characters resembled the true characteristics of colonizer and colonized.

His major character in the novel is John Flory, European timber manager,

who has spent fifteen years living in Kyauktada. He possesses intelligence and

kinship to native. He tends to like the natives by supporting one of them to be

first local natives’ member admitted to the European Club. As a result, “He is

alienated from his countrymen not only by his superior intellect but his

willingness to accept, enjoy and even, heretically, like the local natives” (Lee,

1969:820). These arguments build a solid background of identity shown by

Flory’s attitudes, contradicted from his fellow colonizer. Whereas, the local


8

natives that is dominantly presented by U Po Kin, the highest native official in

British colonial government, is living the feeling of hegemony by eagerly

desired to join the European Club. Since he was a child when he was looking

at the British soldiers marched to Mandalay, he had been dreaming to be one

of them, fighting for them instead of his nation (Orwell, 1934:6).

Postcolonial issues are addressed in a way that the novel takes British

imperialism in Burma as a background. This creates an atmosphere where

Flory also speculates upon his condition:

What was at the center of all his thoughts now and what poisonedeverything, was the ever bitterer hatred of the atmosphere of theimperialism in which he lived for as his brain developed – you cannot stopyour brain developing, and it is one of the tragedies of half educated thatthey develop late, when they are already committed to some wrong way oflife – he had grasped the truth about the English and their Empire (asquoted by Rai, 1983: 50)

This illustrates that Flory himself is aware that he is somewhat trapped in the

wheel of colonialism. He then wishes to get away from such situation but it is

too late. What Flory has in mind conforms the idea that all the characters in

the novel are conjectured to colonialism. Thus, U Po Kyin is apparently

included. However, he might response to imperialism differently compared to

Flory.

Another study from Poznar in Orwell and Little Brother, indicates that

how U Po Kyin reacts to the state of colonialism. As pictured in the novel

where Kyin really wants to get the membership of the Club, Poznar comments

that Kyin’s ambition is a sign of inferiority while “all of the English in the

novel share this exhilarating sense of superiority, the illusion of power”


9

(Poznar, 1985:259). Poznar emphasizes his study on the English characters

while this study will discuss the sense of inferiority through the native

character.

The Club here also represents a symbol of the core of the colonial power.

Its centrality attracts those who are in the periphery to come nearer. Sinha as

quoted in Gopinath’s research entitled An Oprhaned Manliness: The Pukka

Sahib and The End of Empire in “A Passage to India” and “Burmese Days”

remarked about how essential the Club to the British Empire. She said that:

The narrative emphasizes the centrality of the Club, not just in Kyauktadabut the British empire, when it points out that it is “the spiritual citadel, thereal seat of British power, the Nirvana for which native officials andmillionaires pine in vain (Gopinath, 2009:212)

Thus, it approves the idea why Kyin wants to get the membership of the club.

Given the fact that he is a native official who is a sub-divisional magistrate

eases him to get into the club using his power. Gopinath’s study agrees with

the idea that this study also remarks the importance of the Club in the stage of

Kyin’s crisis of identity and mimicry.

Another study then suggests that every character in the novel are

imprisoned. Lee in Symbol and Structure in Burmese Days: A Revaluation

explain how every character imprisons themselves with the things they

encounter. He said that:

… the entire novel displays the captivity of all the characters: in theirstriving for English values, Burmese such as U Po Kyin and Veraswamiincarcerate themselves; in the closed world of the Club, the Englishenslave their servants and each other in bigotry and solipsism; perhapsmost significant of all, the jungles make captives of all inhabitants. (Lee,1969:833)


10

These sums up the idea that Burmese character in the novel are longing for

Englishness. As a result, their ambitions somehow ‘incarcerate themselves’ so

that they are no longer aware of the subtle imprisonment they create

themselves. This study signifies what the writer observes in this study that

Kyin suffered from crisis of identity as he wanted to get the membership of

the Club. Imprisonment of Kyin is also observed in a form of his mimicry

towards the British.

The studies the writer has reviewed in this part provide the writer with an

idea how Burmese Days presents its characters’ responses towards the British

imperialism. Every character in the novel possess their uniqueness in dealing

with colonialism as seen through their characterization. Therefore, the writer

draws this study closely on a Burmese character, U Po Kyin. This study

explains how he suffers from crisis of identity as he admits of being inferior to

the British. Then, the writer observes how he manages to response his crisis

by employing mimicry to the British as he believes that entering the Club is

the key.


11

B. Review of Related Theories

1. Theory of Characters and Characterization

Characters play a vital role in literary works as it is explained by

Abrams and Harpham:

Characters are the persons represented in a dramatic or narrativework, who are interpreted by the reader as possessing particularmoral, intellectual, and emotional qualities by inferences fromwhat the persons say and their distinctive ways of saying it—thedialogue—and from what they do—the action. (Abrams andHarpham, 2009:42)

The importance of character appears as a basic element of narrative work

because all the events that happen in the story consist of characters to be a

‘device’ to deliver the message to readers. Moreover, characters are

representation of human being in verbal terms narrative work having

thought, speech and behavior as it is shown in daily life (Roberts and

Jacobs, 1987:119). Some characteristics devices included speech and

actions are reflection of their temperament, desires and moral natures.

They are called ‘motivation’ by Abrams and Harpham (Abrams and

Harpham, 2009:42).

There are mainly two ways of characterization. The first is

showing. Showing tends to be more dramatic as the author introduces the

character explicitly and let the readers conclude the final assumption

towards the characters themselves. Then, the second is telling. Telling

means that the author decides to describe the qualities of a character as an

observer or a storyteller. Generally, most authors convey the information

about the characters by providing readers with certain habits, other


12

characters’ comments, characters way of thinking, and description from

authors (Abrams and Harpham, 2009:43).

2. Theory of Identity Crisis

Rutherford provides an example where he uses the story of

Lawrence of Arabia as the background. He proposes the idea that when

Lawrence was stranded in the dessert, he faced the confusion of himself.

Dessert was metaphorically used as the border between the known and

unknown territories as Rutherford puts it “margin between the habitable

and the inhabitable” (Rutherford, 1990:9). Then, Lawrence suffers from

crisis of identity as stated by Rutherford:

For Lawrence the dessert left him neither Arab nor English: ‘I haddropped one form and not taken on another’. In a morecontemporary setting Baudrillard has commented, ‘in the dessertone loses one’s identity’. (Rutherford, 1990:10)

Then, the dessert is assumed to the sign of difference as a line to separate

one to the other. The idea of the dichotomy of “white/black,

masculine/feminine, hetero/homosexual, where one term is always

dominant and the other is subordinate, that our identities are formed”

applies in the representation of the desert as a border (Rutherford,

1990:10).

In the context of Postcolonial, the concept of dichotomy offered by

Rutherford applies in colonializer/colonized. Colonializer is taken as

dominant whereas colonized is subordinate. This signifies the effect of

difference as perceived by the effect the existence of the other group.

When one’s identity experience changes, transformation and hybridity as


13

all of those are the correlative effect of fears, anxieties, confusion and

arguments, one would undergo the process of achieving identity

(Rutherford, 1990:10). By examining these changes, one’s movement

from one society to the other can be observed as the critique of

essentialism because it believes that identity is not fixed. Therefore, an

indigenous identity is shifted through a process of arguments that one day

he/she would achieve the sense of Englishness because English identity is

believed to be more superior to theirs.

According to Rutherford, there must be an interrelationship

between one identity (society) with another where power embodied as an

important aspect. This means that the relationship between identity to

another identity is based on assumption of power and authority.

Rutherford discusses the failure of categorization of the Communist Party

to promote the erasure of the oppression of sexuality, race and gender. The

system successfully recognizes the power every dichotomy of sexuality,

race and gender but it fails to eliminate “the element of practical politics:

choice, doubt, strategy, planning, error and transformation.” (Rutherford,

1990:17). As a result, the form of oppression exists because everyone falls

into polarities like white-black, working class-ruling class and no

exception of colonial and colonized. Then, the colonial government

happens to claim to be superior as they believe they possess more power

than the ‘Other’. They commence to initiate the oppression against the

inferior, the local natives.


14

Ashcroft offers the term ‘Place and Displacement’ to elaborate the

crisis of identity in the postcolonial discourse. He insists that it is when

the special post-colonial crisis of identity comes into being; theconcern with the development or recovery of an effectiveidentifying relationship between self and place (Ashcroft, 2002:8)

Thus, it is important to notice the relationship between the image of

postcolonial subject, the colonized in certain aspect of location. Location

here means how he is positioned in social structure of colonial life.

One of the main causes this phenomenon to happen is cultural

denigration. Ashcroft indicates that there is always be a form of

oppression. He explains that:

A valid and active sense of self may have been eroded bydislocation, … it may have been destroyed by cultural denigration,the conscious and unconscious oppression of the indigenouspersonality and culture by a supposedly superior racial or culturalmodel. (Ashcroft, 2002:9)

The oppression exists because there is a claim from the ‘supposedly

superior racial’ over the inferior. This practice destroys the self-image of

the indigenous people. Though, sometimes, the devastation is highly

manipulated in form of their slogan of enlightening people and support for

the longevity of colonial prosperity.

The result of displacement is alienation (Ashcroft, 2002:9). As the

image of self is eroded or destroyed, the crisis of self-image starts to

appear. Ashcroft provides some results of displacement. He said:

the possession and practice of ‘Englishness’, also show clear signsof alienation even within the first generation of settlement, andmanifest a tendency to seek an alternative, differentiated identity?(Ashcroft, 2002:9)


15

It is when the colonized begin to be alienated among their native society. It

is also clear to observe that those who tend to get acquainted of the

Englishness suffer from crisis of identity.

3. Theory of Mimicry

As it has been introduced in the realm of literary devices by the

famous Plato’s term mimesis, mimicry here would occupy the same

qualities. Bhabha explains that mimicry in postcolonial is “the desire for a

reformed, recognizable Other, as a subject of difference that is almost the

same but not quite” (Bhabha, 2004:122). It refers to the determination of

the Other to signify themselves as the colonizer. They may acquire certain

qualities but they will never be ‘them’. Bhabha formulates that:

Mimicry is, thus the sign of a double articulation; a complexstrategy of reform, regulation, and discipline, which ‘appropriates’the Other as it visualizes power (Bhabha, 2004: 123)

However, mimicry also affects both sides, colonized and colonizer.

The ambivalence of mimicry lies on the ‘partial’ part of the colonial

subject. Colonizer is dependent upon the relation between the authoritative

power of colonialism and the success of implying the power to the Other,

the indigenous people. Partiality is seen from the position of mimicry as a

strategic plan as well as menace (Bhabha, 2004: 123). This means that

when mimicry is employed into practices there would be some menace

effect which would disturb the stability of the colonial government. For

example, when the British introduced proper education to certain class of


16

people in India, the British were afraid that the intellectuals they produce

would one day turn against them. Therefore, the colonized people are

affected in a way that there is a group of local people who are enlightened

as they receive the British education as well as they mimic the culture of

the British. On the other hand, the British as the colonizer are not affected

culturally. They would never consider the colonized as equal even though

some of them are educated like them but still the British would be less

concerned with the idea of equality. The British would consider more

about how their empire is endangered as now there were some local

intellectuals who were ready to criticize the British.

Bhabha also comments on the mimicry as a means of repetition

rather than representation because the colonizer is put in the discourse of

the failure of the colonial system itself. He said “… the effect of flawed

colonial mimesis, in which to be Anglicized is emphatically not to be

English” (Bhabha, 2004: 125). Therefore, it is justified that colonized

repeatedly practice the signification of colonial as if they (the Other)

utilize the practice the power of being colonial or imperial. The identity

associated with the English values as they have been dreaming of would

never be achieved because they are only given selected knowledge and

false and also limited authority under strict control of the British.

Rutherford has also remarked that identity is determined based on

the politics of different. He agreed with Gramsci upon the idea of

collective identity. Gramsci believed that politics is the new of the


17

formation of new collective identity as shown in the strike of minority’s

leftist such as gay and lesbian groups. These groups are obvious fall into,

if categorization is applied, left movements along with communist and

feminist and other leftist. However, the strike triggers the revolutionary

politics of culture resulting that “… the politically negotiable and

incomplete character of identity and social formations” (Rutherford,

1990:19). Thus, identification of political identity as in colonial system

where oppression was severe and attached to the system of colonial itself

is never be nor singular neither predictable.

The ambivalence of mimicry appears because identity cannot be

reduced into single concept because “identity marks the conjuncture of our

past with the social, cultural and economic relations we live within.”

(Rutherford, 1990:19). This means that an identity someone or society

claim to be is consist of many layers which emphasized on the past and its

relation to the present. This concept also argues any forms of fixity and

essentialism because “social, political and class formation do not exist a

priori, they are a product of articulation.” (Rutherford, 1990: 20). As a

result, there is no point when everything (class, gender, and race) just

happen without any correlation with the past events.

What drives someone who is already attached to one identity move

to another identity is human intention itself. Human intention as in form

of wish cannot be separated from the past events. According to Freud as

quoted by Rutherford; “You will see from such an example how the wish


18

employs some event in the present to plan a future on the pattern of the

past.” (Rutherford, 1990:21). This recognizes any events that happened in

the past as determining factors to produce wishes. In the postcolonial

discourse, the wish to get out of a society or identity can be seen from the

oppression so that someone would wish to be oppressed no more by trying

to be like the oppressor.

C. Review of Related Background

1. Burma Under British Imperialism

A. The Historical Background

British annexed Burma in 1885 when they captured the royal capital of

last Burma kingdom, Mandalay. Then, British exiled King Thibaw and

Queen Supalayat to India where the couple spent rest of their lives. The

palace which was located in Mandalay, were turned into military based. It

became the center of colonial life equipped with luxury facilities such as a

polo field, a golf course and tennis courts and also a chapel found within

the complex of the palace since the British took it under control (Larkin,

2004:29).

British also had redecorated many rooms in the palace. They placed a

billiard table in one of sacred rooms that was used to pay homage for

Queen Supalayat. This provides a picturesque description about the typical

interior of the Club in Burmese Days. The Club refers to the elite club,

whose members are all European, where they spent most their times


19

gathering together to enjoy home-like atmosphere by drinking gin or

playing bridge and else. The Club was a citadel as well as fortress to the

British (Larkin, 2004:29).

In 1923, the British introduced a new rule which allow a small number

of Burmese politicians attend the parliament meeting. This rule also

applied to British clubs across the country. They were forced to accept a

local member. However, the segregation remained strong. Larkin gave an

example where:

… the Burmese official who was appointed acting governor in place ofthe British governor who was away on sick leave was denied access tothe Rangoon clubs. (Larkin, 2004:188)

This evidence shows that how strong the segregation was between the

British and Burmese. Thus, the fulfilment of the new regulation was

merely to obey the rule for its sake not to accommodate the Burmese of

their rights.

B. Burmese Officials in the British Raj

When the British annexed Burma, they exiled the king and queen of

last Burmese dynasty and began to employ a new form of government.

Burma became the part of British India or British Raj. In doing so, the

British government “… had removed the respected headmen and replaced

them with its own bureaucratic counterparts.” (Larkin, 2004:67). Thus,

many magistrates and other local officials were corrupt because as long as

they performed the duty as told by the British, they secured their position

the government. They practiced corruption mainly by taking bribery.


20

C. Racism of the British towards Burmese

Orwell believed that racism in the key element of British colonial

system. As he became an eyewitness of colonial in Burma where he

worked as police officer, he concluded an example of racism practice done

by British every day.

Burma was known for the extreme weather in the summer when

intolerably hot sun stung one’s head like a bee. The British always wore

Topi whenever they went out to avoid the sun. However, the Burmese

never wore one. Consequently, the British believed that the Burmese were

biologically different as they did not need any protection from the sun.

This illustration sums up his idea that:

You can only rule over a subject race, especially when you are in asmall minority, if you honestly believe yourself to be racially superior,and it helps towards this if you can believe that the subject race isbiologically different. (Larkin, 2004:160).

The British believed that such practices would differ them from the local

natives. They would feel superior as they thought because human needs

protection from the heat of the sun whereas the Burmese were only

‘savage’ to them.

2. Pagoda as The Center of Religious Identity

Most of Burmese were Buddhist when the British came to the country.

Today, Myanmar is a country that take Buddhist as their national religion.

Pagoda is a quintessential for Burmese as an individual as well as for the


21

country. Larkin on her trip to Burma to trace Orwell back years ago comments

that:

Pagoda are the center of Burmese spiritual life, and every town and villagehas one. People visit the pagoda daily or weekly to pay respect to theBuddha relics which are often enshrined there, to meditate, to give alms,or to attend the festivals held on religious holidays. (Larkin, 2004:77)

Pagoda is the symbol of Buddhism where Buddhist people practice the

religion there. For Burmese people, pagoda has immersed in their hearts as

they always put the pagoda as center of everything they do, especially in

religious affairs. Thus, pagoda is inseparable from Burmese culture because it

plays vital role to Burmese society since hundreds years ago.

They strongly believe in reincarnation and karma. How the karma works is

typical where one has to perform duty as a devoted Buddhist and also they

must outweigh their sin by doing good deeds. For those who are rich enough,

they will donate sum of money to build pagodas. Their sins would also be

redeemed by the number of pagoda they build. According to Larkin when she

was tracing Orwell back in Burma in early 2000, she found out the practice of

the general who donate his money to build pagodas. On a newspaper, she read

that a high ranking official, General Khin Nyunt, gave 900,000 kyats (equal to

900 US Dollars) donation for a pagoda (Larkin, 2004:79).

The idea of donating money for pagoda is supposed to be a religious affair

to many Buddhist in Burma. They would do so if they have enough money.

The practice was also performed by kings of Burma, ‘the royal patrons of the

Buddhist religion’ dated years ago (Larkin, 2004:78). However, Burma was

under junta military government for more than two decades. During this time


22

the people were severely suffered as the army led the country nowhere but

towards poverty. The army also tortured the people, jail those who oppose the

government, and abusing young women (Larkin, 2004:78). Thus, General

Khin Nyunt who pretend himself as a good Buddhist try to outweigh his ‘sins’

by donating the pagoda.

D. Theoretical Framework

The writer uses some related studies, theories and background to answer

the research question. The four related studies provide the writer some

analysis of characters in the novel based on postcolonial theories. The first

study points out the colonial background presented in the novel. Then, the

second study offers an analysis on how inferiority and superiority among

characters exist. The third study emphasizes that the Club is essential in the

British colonialism. The fourth study mentions about how every character are

somehow imprisoned by what they encounter in their surroundings.

The writer utilizes some related theories in order to answer the research

question. As this thesis tries to identify the crisis of identity and mimicry of a

colonial subject, a local official in the colonial government, some of

postcolonial theories are used. However, before observing the main problem

of this research, the writer uses an intrinsic theory of literature. The theory that

is used the theory of character and characterization. It gives a clear

understanding on how the character presented in the novel. It is important to

identify the qualities of the native character in order to provide basic


23

arguments before determining the crisis of identity in the first research

question.

After that, in first and second research question, the writer uses

postcolonial theories. Postcolonial theories detect the impact of colonialization

on the character when he suffers from the crisis of identity. It also shows

dichotomy of power distribution on how the character perceive himself as an

inferior. Postcolonial theories also explain how the crisis of identity occurs in

the colonization era. Then, the theory of mimicry observes why and how the

character mimics the colonizer.

The historical backgrounds contribute to this thesis by conforming the

historical accounts which are related to this thesis. Then, the writer observes

the influence of past events to the analysis of the research questions. There are

some aspects of colonial life in Burma that the writer highlights. They are the

time when the British annexed Burma, the life of local officials in the colonial

government and pagoda as the center Buddhism in Burma. They invoke the

idea why the character’s response in specific manner during his life.


24

CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY

A. Object of the Study

The object this study is a novel by George Orwell whose real name is Eric

Arthur Blair. The novel is called Burmese Days published by Harcourt Inc. in

1934. Then, the copyright is renewed in 1962 but the version remains the

same as published in 1934. The title is believed as a summary of Orwell’s life

in Burma as a British Police Officer. The novel portrays colonial life in Burma

under British Imperialism. In Larkin memoir of Orwell’s life in Burma, she

found out that Orwell first publisher was hesitate to publish the book because

Orwell describe the town setting too realistic and fear that his characters might

be based on real people too (Larkin, 2004: 182).

Recently, in 2013, the novel that has been translated into Burmese by a

Burmese writer, Maung Myint Kywe, received an award of Burma National

Literature award from Burmese Ministry of Infomation. The award is the

highest literary award given to 16 categories. Burmese Days is the winner of

Informative Literature (translation) category (Phyo Tha, 2013:1)

B. Approach of the Study

This study is intended to be a reading of a literary work from postcolonial

perspective. Postcolonial literature as defined by Ashcroft is “… all the culture

affected by the imperial process from the moment of colonialization to the

present day” (Ashcroft, 2002:2). Therefore, all the literature that emerges from


25

their experience of imperial power especially colonization is considered as

postcolonial literatures. In this case, Orwell’s Burmese Days can be seen as a

postcolonial literature because it provides the relationship between the British

as the colonizer and Burmese as the colonized.

This study also generates the idea of crisis of identity in postcolonial

studies. Ashcroft uses the term ‘Place and Displacement’ to picture the idea of

crisis of identity occurs in postcolonial literature. He added that this happen

because of ‘a valid and active sense of self may have been eroded by

dislocation’ (Ashcroft, 2002:9). This occurs because culture or self are

disturbed by colonialization. He then also categorized how a culture is

denigrated by ‘the conscious and unconscious oppression of the indigenous

personality and culture by supposedly superior racial or cultural model’

(Ashcroft, 2002:9). The writer observes that the indigenous character in the

object of the study also suffers from such crisis of identity.

While focusing in the identity issue, the writer also points out the main

ideas in postcolonial discourse as proposed by Bhabha, a prominent figure in

postcolonial studies, mimicry and ambivalence in mimicry. Mimicry generates

the fact that “…colonized people address their oppressor, adopting their

language, clothes, religion, etc.,” but in their mimicry Bhabha describes their

ambivalence; their performance alienates the colonizer from their essence,

thus destabilizing colonialism.

Mimicry is considered as a strategy of those who are oppressed to adapt

way of life of their oppressor. This is seen as a sign of their resistance towards


26

pre-given image that is associated with them by the oppressor. Although,

mimicry creates ambivalence because the result of mimicry is “to be

Anglicized is emphatically not to be English” (Bhabha, 2004: 125). Therefore,

the oppressed will never be the same like the oppressor.

Post-colonialism is in general taken into account as historical phases that

undergone by Third World countries after the decline of colonialism (Guerin

and Labor, 2011: 361). Hence in a larger context, post-colonialism provides

insights to see ‘Alienated’ world that refers to ‘the Other’ by western society.

As represented through language, English Literature is not ‘free’ from

colonialism influenced. Said’s Orientalism postulates:

…’Orientalism’ as an enormous system or inter-textual network of rulesand procedures which regulate anything that may be thought, written orimagined about the Orient.

This emphasizes that colonialism as a whole construct of western society

towards Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean. In order to address

nationality, ethnicity and politics issues of identity.

This study addresses identity issue by applying those theories into

practices. The aims of this study are to identify the crisis of identity and the

strategy of mimicry employed by the Burmese character, U Po Kyin. As

identity is fluid that means rejecting tainted pre-given identity created by

colonizer (Barry, 2009:189), the result of this study is a discussion on how

crisis of identity occurs and mimicry employed in the characterization of the

Burmese character.


27

C. Method of the Study

Library research is applied in this study as a method as well as a tool to

perform the analysis. Bulk of readings on postcolonial especially topics

related to the novel are obligatory to be read. Additionally, this study contains

a handful citation from expert in postcolonial discourse. Most of the citations

are also cited in many works and researches in postcolonial studies in recent

years.

The main source of this study is Orwell’s Burmese Days, which was

originally published in 1934. By the time this study is conducted, the writer

uses an edition of the novel published by Harcourt, Inc. with renewed

copyright in 1962. However, this version is the same with the original version

published in 1934. The secondary sources are various books and articles

related to this study. Most citations come from Rutherford’s Identity,

Community, Culture, Difference, Ashcroft’s The Empire Writes Back,

Bhabha’s The Location of Culture, and Larkin’s Finding Orwell in Burma.

Some steps were taken methodically to complete this thesis. Those were:

firstly, the writer arranged some related sources to find out some related

studies that were relevant to the topic of the study. Secondly, upon arranging

some related studies, the writer began to scrutinize the studies based on the

research question. Thirdly, the writer decided which theories to be used. In

order to answer the first research question about crisis of identity, first, the

writer employed intrinsic literary theory to identify how the character

presented in the novel. The writer used the theory of characterization.


28

Fourthly, postcolonial theories were used to answer research questions based

on order. The theory of crisis of identity was utilized in this step. In this part,

the writer elaborated how the character suffers from crisis of identity in the

British colonialization in Burma. Fifthly, the second research question was

answered by employing theory of mimicry. The writer highlighted how the

character mimics the oppressor, the British. All of these steps were performed

thoroughly in order to provide eloquent discussion of the research questions.

Finally, the writer articulated the ideas of crisis of identity suffered by the

character and how the character employed mimicry as a strategy of resistance.


29

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS

This chapter provides analysis on crisis of identity and mimicry of U Po

Kyin. The writer explains how U Po Kyin, a Burmese character in the novel

suffers from criris of identity. Then, he later chose to mimic out of his crisis.

Though, he seems to achieve everything he desired, he is seen as a result of

mimicry in the postcolonial discourse. He is powerful among Burmese yet he

is paradoxically powerless compared to the British.

The writer explains how U Po Kyin suffers from crisis of identity because

he has been dreaming to fight besides the British since they marched into the

city of Mandalay. The writer employs crisis of identity theory by Rutherford

and Ashcroft and mimicry theory by Bhabha to analyze the changing in U Po

Kyin. Contextually, Burmese Days gives complete events in U Po Kyin’s life

while providing a plot to identify how Kyin suffers from crisis of identity and

how he manages to mimic the British. Even though on the surface, he seems to

achieve all of him dreams.

A. Crisis of Identity suffered by U Po Kyin

1. Characterization of U Po Kyin in the Novel

Kyin is characterized in a way of showing. The author of Burmese Days

provides vast details in comments of Kyin actions rather than his own voice.

However, some of Kyin’s manners and qualities are observed from his

conversation with another character such as his wife. Most of the times, the


30

narrator reveals Kyin’s thought directly to the readers. Kyin’ desires,

temperaments and moral natures are observed through the description of the

character by the narrator. Therefore, it is noticed that Kyin’s ambition remain

stable and unchanged throughout the novel.

From the beginning of the novel the readers are presented with the

description of Kyin. The narrator begins with “U Po Kyin, Subdivisional

Magistrate of Kyauktada, in Upper Burma, was sitting in his veranda”

(Orwell, 1934:5). After that, the narrator goes on with the description of the

time and situation of the moment Kyin is sitting in his veranda. Kyin’s

appearance is also narrated in details as seen in:

Unblinking, rather like a great porcelain idol, U Po Kyin gazed out into thefierce sunlight. He was a man of fifty, so fat that for years he had not risenfrom his chair without help, and yet shapely and even beautiful in hisgrossness; for the Burmese do not sag and bulge like white men, but growfat symmetrically, like fruits swelling. His face was vast, yellow and quiteunwrinkled, and his eyes were tawny. (Orwell, 1934:5)

That is why, most of Kyin’s manners, attitudes and qualities are observed

through telling way characterization.

U Po Kyin’s admiration of British Empire began when he was a little boy.

One day he saw an army of British Empire marching in Mandalay streets.

According to history, this was the day when the British finally captured the

capital city of Burmese Kingdom. After that, last king and queen of Burma

dynasty, Thibaw and Supalayat were exiled to India. Since then, Kyin has

been living his life by believing that someday he would acquire the

Englishness.


31

Kyin is considered as a sly man. This can be observed from how he

manages to excel in his career. He keeps being promoted not because of his

good works but his cunning practices. When he works at the bazaar as a clerk

for a rice merchant, he also sometimes steals. The way he gets his job at the

government is by bribing with money he has from blackmailing someone. As

stated in:

Then when he was twenty a lucky stroke of blackmail put him inpossession of four hundred rupees, and he went at once to Rangoon andbought his way into a Government clerkship (Orwell, 1934:6)

It is when the author narrates that Kyin starts his career in an untrustworthy

way. He does not get work because he has the ability to perform the job but he

‘buys’ the position.

When he seizes another chance to be promoted, he does not need any

second thought to get the position. He thinks that his salary of being a clerk

does not enough. He also earns more income by “misappropriating

Government stores” (Orwell, 1934:6). That is why he wants to be promoted in

order to get bigger salary and chance of blackmailing as he usually does. The

way he makes his way to get the higher position is also far from he deserves.

This illustrates his doing:

One day he discovered that the Government, being short of minorofficials, were going to make some appointments from among the clerks.The news would have become public in another week, but it was one of PoKyin’s qualities that his information was always a week ahead of everyoneelse’s. He saw his chance and denounced all his confederates before theycould take alarm. Most of them were sent to prison, and Po Kyin wasmade an Assistant Township Officer of his honesty. (Orwell, 1934:6)


32

Therefore, he has been still dreaming of being promoted even further. He also

thought that he would have Englishman as his equals or even subordinates.

He keeps being promoted until he reaches a position of magistrate. Under

his jurisdiction, there are some villages which he must look after to settle

disputes among the villagers. However, he does not perform his duty honestly.

This can be seen from the description of Kyin when he makes the decision to

solve problems. It is said:

As a magistrate his methods were simple. Even for the vastest bribe hewould never sell the decision of a case, because he knew that a magistratewho gives wrong judgements is caught sooner or later. His practice, amuch safer one, was to take bribes from both sides and then decide thecase on strictly legal ground. (Orwell, 1934:6)

Kyin ignores the idea of justice when making the decision as a magistrate. He

indeed makes the decision of the disputes based on facts in order to maintain

his reputation. However, he also still receives bribes to profit himself as well.

His cunning practices are far beyond mention. Surprisingly, he has never

been put in trial. His tactics are so subtle and shrewd in order to avoid some

accusations. He “… simply discredited it with strings of suborned witnesses,

following this up by counter-accusations which left him in a stronger position

than ever” (Orwell, 1934:7). As a result of this, Kyin easily get credits of his

seemingly good works. He never fails to carry out his responsibility to settle

any problems. Thus, he is going to promoted even further.

The narrator continues to build a character on Kyin to have devilish

thought and ambition. When there is an article on a bilingual patriotic

newspaper called “Burmese Patriot”, exposing and blaming an English Deputy


33

Commissioner named Macgregor, Kyin seizes the chance to put an Indian-

born doctor, Verasvami, to be blamed. He says:

Now, let us go into this affair from the beginning. We are going to make aconcerted attack on Dr. Veraswami, who is the Civil Surgeon andSuperintendent of the jail. We are going to slander him, destroy hisreputation and finally ruin him forever. It will be a delicate operation.(Orwell, 1934:11)

He produces an anonymous letter to be sent to Macgregor in order to convince

him that it is Dr. Verasvami who writes the article. The narrator successfully

delivers the image of Kyin as a corrupt official.

In the beginning, Kyin’s intention is only to destroy the doctor’s

reputation. However, when he knows the news that every European Club in

the British Empire has to accept a new membership for a local, he shifts his

plans into a bigger result. When he has a discussion with his wife he says:

You were asking just now what is my real object in this affair. You think, Isuppose, that I am ruining Veraswami merely because I dislike him andhis ideas about bribes as a nuisance. It is not only that. There is somethingelse that is far more important, and it concerns you as well as me. (Orwell,1934: 141)

Therefore, it is clear that he wants more than denouncing the doctor. His

discussion with his wife continues when he mentions what his real intention

is. He says that:

It is this. I happen to know that in a month’s time the Europeans are goingto elect one native member to their Club. They do not want to do it, butthey will have orders from the Commissioner, and they will obey.Naturally, they would elect Veraswami, who is the highest native officialin the district. But I have disgraced Veraswami. And so----- (Orwell, 1934:143).

The European Club is an elite club where atmosphere of British is reproduced

daily by placing bar and bridges card-game in the room. The members of the


34

club are obviously all British and other Europeans. When the regulation to

elect a local native member is spread out, many rejections come from most

members of Kyauktada’s Club. Kyin definitely wants to get the membership

as he believes by being the member of the club, his status in the society would

be raised.

More complexities in the characterization are added when the narrator

creates more intrigues to the story. Kyin’s plan of anonymous letters continues

but does not necessarily succeed. He, then, creates a false rebellion issue in the

town. This can be seen as an effort to destroy the doctor’s reputation as Kyin

himself said:

This rebellion is the very thing to get rid of him. Of course we shall neverprove that he is responsible for it; but what does that matter? All theEuropeans will take it for granted that he is mixed up in it somehow. Thatis how their minds work. He will be ruined for life. And his fall is my rise.(Orwell, 1934: 140)

The tense is increased as the British consider the rebellion as a disturbance of

the colonial system in the district of Kyauktada. The British decides to send

more army to the town. Kyin who is the real actor behind this issue has

prepared everything quite smoothly. He pays all the rebels who are actually

small in number which the harmful effect is subtle almost nothing compared

to the British army stationed in the town. The false rebellion is again an effort

to disgrace the doctor reputation so that his chance to get elected to the Club

decreased.

The narrator provides the readers with a surprising outcome when

rebellion do not produce positive effect for Kyin. It is pictured in “the whole


35

miserable rebellion was so obviously at an end that the Europeans were not

considered in any danger… “(Orwell, 1934: 225). However, suddenly, Kyin is

in favorable situation again when one European is murdered and cut into

pieces by locals whose relatives are shot by the European. This certainly

creates a high tension among Europeans in Kyauktada as they raise their

suspicion and alert towards natives. Kyin takes advantages upon this situation

because he plans a finale of his evil plans to destroy the doctor’s reputation

and get elected to the Club.

Before launching his final plan, the tension brake out when the Club is

surrounded by angry crowd of natives. The crowds shout for a European who

previously blinds one school boy because they tease him. Kyin detects this

situation as an advantageous moment for him. He tries to calm down the

crowd. By the time the crowd is under control, Kyin catches the opportunity to

take credit of settling down the crowd. It is illustrated in:

He came towards them with a martial air, carrying a huge stick, and with arevolver thrust into his belt. His dress was a studios negligée-singlet andShan trousers- to give the impression that he had rushed out his housepost-haste. He had been lying low until the danger should be over, and wasnow hurrying forth to grab a share of any credit that might going. (Orwell,1934:254)

Nevertheless, the riot is not part of Kyin’s plan to crush Dr. Veraswami. He

realizes that the situation does not necessarily support him. However, Kyin

learns the friendship between the doctor and one European is quite special.

He comes into conclusion that in order to completely ruin the doctor’s

image, he has to smash the image of that European man also. Kyin is aware

that the European man falls in love with a European woman. However, the


36

European man previously keeps a Burmese mistress at his house. Kyin knows

the dismissal of the mistress from his home. He also knows that the Burmese

girl still hopes that the European man would still give her money. One day,

when the man is at the church planning to propose his lover after the mass,

Kyin gets the Burmese mistress come into the church and shouts crazily for

the European man. It is narrated that:

Like the crocodile, U Po Kyin had struck at the weakest spot. For, needlessto say, this scene was U Po Kyin’s doing. He had seen his chance, asusual, and tutored Ma Hla May for her part with considerable care.(Orwell, 1934: 274)

This is the time when the doctor receives support no more because his

European friend had been ashamed because of the scene in the church. He

then shoots himself to death. By this time a final false accusation Kyin throws

at Dr. Verasvami results in a catastrophe. The European could no longer see

Dr. Verasvami as a doctor with a good reputation anymore. Kyin finally gets

the membership of the club though rejections of many European members are

still around. He comes to the club rarely. When he comes, he is there mainly

for drinking and playing bridge. Most of the times, the rest of the members do

not consider his presence at all.

At the end of his career, he keeps being promoted after taking many

credits from the riot at Kyautada. He is Deputy Commissioner before he

retires. He is also awarded a medal to recognize his service to the British

Empire. He is still greedy as before but richer by taking a huge amount of

bribery alone. As he is afraid of Karma he would get after making many


37

evildoings through his life, he decides to redeem his sins by making pagodas.

Unfortunately, he is dead before he could do so.

2. Crisis of Identity of U Po Kyin

U Po Kyin has been admiring British since he was a little boy. He seems to

ignore the fact that the coming of British to Burma as a triumphant because

they finally annex the last kingdom in Burma and exile its king and queen.

However, U Po Kyin comprehends the moment differently that:

U Po Kyin’s earliest memory, back in the ‘eighties, was of standing, anaked pot-bellied child, watching the British troops march victorious intoMandalay. … He had taken to his heels after watching them for a fewminutes. In his childish way he had grasped that his own people were nomatch for this race of giants. (Orwell, 1934: 5)

Even though, he is an innocent child, he cultivates the admiration of British

Army. He has not happened to realize the effect of British annexation yet but

his feelings have clouded his mind until he is adult. This becomes clear when

in the next line the narrator states that “to fight on the side of the British, to

become parasite upon them, had been his ruling ambition, even as a child.”

(Orwell: 1934: 5).

The marching of the British soldiers in the street of Mandalay symbolizes

the intervention of the colonial in the Burmese culture. The young Kyin as a

Burmese does not realize the oppression because the form of oppression is

unconscious to Kyin. Ashcroft named this situation as cultural denigration that

happens because “the conscious and unconscious oppression of the indigenous

personality and culture by a supposedly superior racial or cultural model”

(Aschroft, 2002:9). Burmese culture is now denigrated as the British takes


38

control in every aspect of life in Burma. This also means that Kyin’s self-

image of being Burmese is challenged.

There are some evidences that picture Kyin’s childhood who was a fan of

British since then. As explained in the characterization of the character, Kyin

holds a high position the British Colonial government system in Burma. He is

the Subdivisional Magistrate of Kyakutada in the beginning in the novel. He

kept being a corrupt official by taking bribe and terrorizing the locals. He then

realized that there was a chance to be promoted to high level as states:

Now, at fifty-six, he was a Sub-div isional Magistrate, and he wouldprobably be promoted and made an acting Deputy Commissioner, withEnglishmen as his equals and even his subordinates. (Orwell, 1934:6)

This shows his burning ambition to take his chance and make his childhood

dream comes true. Thus, it is not a surprise when he deploys many kinds of

evil plans to clear his career path in order to foster his desire to be like English

man.

The desire to attain the status of Englishmen is a sign of Kyin’s alienation

within his Burmese society. He puts a lot effort to identify his self with an

alternative identity because he feels he does not want to belong to Burmese as

colonial subject. Ashcroft notes this as the result of displacement. He said:

the possession and practice of ‘Englishness’, also show clear signs ofalienation even within the first generation of settlement, and manifest atendency to seek an alternative, differentiated identity? (Ashcroft, 2002:9)

Therefore, Kyin chooses the option to pursue his dream to ‘fight fot the British

side” as he has been dreaming of since he was a child.


39

As his calumnies again Dr. Verasvami, his rival, do not necessarily

succeed altogether, his wife also knows this and curses his doings.

Surprisingly, when he reveals to his wife what his core intention is, he

acquires support from his wife. In the beginning his wife is afraid that Kyin’s

evil doing would not be able to redeem, as Buddhist Burmese believed it, so

that Kyin would turn into animal from like frog or rat. She said that:

Consider what happens to those who have lived wickedly. There is such athing, for instance, as being turned into a rat or a frog. There is even hell. Iremember what a priest said to me once about hell, something that he hadtranslated from Pali scriptures, and it was very terrible. He said ‘Once in athousand centuries two red-hot spears will meet in your heart, and you willsay to yourself, ‘Another thousand centuries of my torment are ended, andthere is as much to come as there has been before.’ (Orwell, 1934:141)

Kin Kin, U Po Kyin’s wife, believed those who have done evildoings in his

life would be condemned. In doing so, she defines his husband slender against

Dr. Verasvami was evil. She is obviously aware his husband is taking bribery.

The picturesque of how Kyin wife explain the concept of hell in Buddhism

to Kyin indicates that Kyin’s wife is a devoted Burmese Buddhist. This shows

Kyin’s place in the society that he is a Burmese. However, by the intervention

of the British into their culture alter their idea of life offered by Buddhism and

displaced by the image of the English values (Ashcroft, 2002:9). They may or

may not aware of the oppression as Kyin also holds a position of a high

ranking official in the British colonial government in Burma. However, this

still causes their Buddhism image that crafted in their hearts scattered. They

are replaced with the image of being English. They then reproduce the idea of

karma in Buddhism into their favor to pursue the English self.


40

At the beginning of the novel Burmese belief of reincarnation is also

mentioned. After the narrator describes how corrupt Kyin is, he then talks

about how Kyin would redeem his evil doings in his life.

He would devote his closing years to good works, which would pile upenough merit to outweigh the rest of his life. Probably his good workswould take the form of building pagodas. Four pagodas, five, six, seven -the priests would tell him how many-… And he would return to the earthin male human shape - … (Orwell, 1934:7)

Pagoda is an essential aspect of Burmese religious life in Myanmar until now.

Larkin confirms this concept when she visited Burma in early 2000. She says:

Pagoda are the center of Burmese spiritual life, and every town and villagehas one. People visit the pagoda daily or weekly to pay respect to theBuddha relics which are often enshrined there, to meditate, to give alms,or to attend the festivals held on religious holidays. (Larkin, 2004:77)

This shows that Kyin is aware of the result of his action from the beginning. In

doing so, he is also prepared for redeeming the sins of his. His act of

destroying Dr. Verasvami is not an exception of his nature of being a corrupt

official from the beginning. Kyin’s acts are similar to the practices of general

that Larkin observes. She summarizes:

Like today’s generals, U Po Kyin, the corrupt Burmese magistrate inOrwell’s Burmese Days, considered himself a good Buddhist. He believedthat all the evil he had done in this life – cheating people for money … Hetherefore planned to devote the later years of his life to doing good works,to counteract out the bad things he had done and balance the scales ofkarmic justice. (Larkin, 2004:78)

This idea of the centralistic of Buddhism and the idea of karma are not

necessarily to be judged on morality basis but on cultural aspect. It means that

how Kyin basically is used to have a strong connection with his self-image as


41

a good Buddhist. However, now, he has to manipulate the idea of being good

Buddhist to suit his ambition to acquire Englishness.

Kyin is annoyed with his life even though he is in a better situation

compared with most Burmese. He seems not to care about his wrong doings,

and he even still craves for more. This is also a characteristic of core intention

of Kyin which is not to be grateful. He grows more furiously to obtain his

desire. He says that:

I am tired of eating with my fingers and associating only with Burmans−poor, inferior people− and living, as you might say, like to feel like amiserable Township Officer. Money is not enough; I should like to feelthat I have risen in world as well. (Orwell, 1934: 142)

Kyin wants more than just money he clearly states in the novel. He is eager to

gain more than establishments. He begins to reconsider his social status in

then society as he thinks that being rich was not enough. It is Kyin’s self-

imaged that is oppressed and then eroded not his economic condition.

Therefore, he believes that there are many chances and ways to accomplish his

dream to attain Englishness.

It is clear that Kyin is ashamed of being Burmese. He acknowledges that

being Burmese associates him with inferiority. Ashcroft comments that “a

valid and active sense of self may have been eroded” (Ashcroft, 2002:8). This

idea approves that Kyin as a Burmese self is eroded because he feels inferior.

He also notices that money is not enough for him because his identity is not

necessarily formed with money but culture. That is why when his Burmese

culture is eroded, he begins to feel inferior and questions his identity.


42

When Kyin expresses his view on his current life, he unconsciously

admitted that he is in the part of inferior society. Rutherford believes that

one’s identity is achieved through the polarities of characteristics. He

comments that:

It is within their polarities of white/black, masculine/feminine,hetero/homosexual, where one term is always dominant and the othersubordinate, that our identities are formed. (Rutherford, 1990:10)

This situation occurs in Kyin when he says that his ambition to crush Dr.

Verasvami by all means because he has been dreaming the ultimate dream. He

believes that his dream to be a member of the European Club is “the very

highest honor an Oriental can attain to.” (Orwell, 1934: 142). Oriental term

that is used here is equally the same with colonized people. Therefore, he

refers himself as an Oriental who possibly reaches the noblest dream to be like

the European. The polarity appears that the Oriental is inferior to the West

because an Oriental could only achieve the greatest achievement given by the

West.

The desire of being the member of the club does not only strike U Po Kyin

but also his rival, Dr. Verasvami. Upon knowing Kyin’s plans to destroy his

reputation, he also begins to develop a desire of the Club. The doctor believes

that the only way to avoid of being accused as a proprietor to the Colonial

government is elected to the Club. He then indeed mentions his ambition

several times to Flory, his British friend, when they have a conversation. He

describes the Club as “a fortress impregnable”. He is going to use his

membership as a shield against any accusation thrown at him. There are at


43

least three times he mentioned his desire to be the member to Flory in only

just one conversation. The situation which Kyin has undergone is interrelated

with the reading of Bhabha’s mimicry concept. Bhabha postulates that “the

desire for a reformed, recognizable Other, as a subject of diference that is

almost the same but not quite” (Bhabha, 2004:122). As discussed earlier, the

ruling ambition of U Po Kyin is ‘to be the same but not quite’ grows since he

is ‘a naked pot-bellied’ boy. This drives him to advance his career path by

launching his dirty campaign towards his challenger, Dr. Verasvami.

More plausible explanation of their condition is stated by Kin, the wife of

U Po Kyin. Ma Kin is an ordinary girl before married to U Po Kyin. In

beginning when her husband purposes the idea of entering the Club, Kin

argues that her life now is far better. She thinks that there is no more to be

achieved. However, her husband idea strikes her mind when he starts to

imagine the life of the member of the Club would be. Ma Kin could no longer

resist the corrupt plans of his husband. She lets down any walls that defense

her feeling whenever she disapproves her husband wicked ideas. Her husband

deeds of taking bribery and terrorizing the villagers blind her with the desire

of being the wife of the member of the Club.

It is not only Kyin but also his wife who is perplexed with the idea that

Kyin is going to be a member of the European Club. They see the Club as

“…that mysterious temple, that holy of hollies far harder of entry than

nirvana!” (Orwell, 1934:143). Both of them symbolize the Club as a

‘mysterious temple’ which would offer them more than they could think of.


44

Hence, Kyin’s family social status would not only entangle by wealth but also

respect that he gains through the membership of the Club.

In order to support the idea that the U Po Kyin is in the state of feeling

inferiority, it can be seen through Dr. Verasvami, Kyin’s rival, when he is

talking to Flory, white man, and he says he knows that Kyin launches evil

campaign to destroy his reputation in front of the Europeans. When, Flory

tries to calm the doctor down, he says that:

All depends upon one’s standing with the Europeans. If my standing issgood, they will not believe it of me; if bad, they will believe it. Prestige issall. (Orwell, 1934:149)

Corresponding to this statement, Flory delivers no argumentation but

agreement. The Europeans who always have the sentiment towards local, as

discussed earlier in the context of Rutherford’s idea of identity, that locals are

always bad and wrong. Those who could gain their respect are only local

natives who have good reputation.

U Po Kyin mentions the word of inferiority or things associate to it. It is

true that he holds a high ranking official the local can attain to in the British

Raj system, but he cannot detach himself from the society that is denigrated.

Ashcroft pictures this as “cultural denigration, the conscious and unconscious

oppression of the indigenous personality and culture by a supposedly superior

racial or cultural model.” (Ashcroft, 2002:9) The affirmation of their

inferiority status is uttered by another member of the same society, fellow

colonized, Dr. Verasvami. He has remarked that “’Hanging together’, ass you

call it. It iss the secret of your superiority to we Orientals” (Orwell, 1934:147).


45

This statement contains the idea of dependency as well as the

acknowledgment of the colonizer power and superiority. In that statement, the

doctor needs Flory as a white man to maintain and gain more status in order to

elevate their position among the society.

B. Crisis of Identity leads to Mimicry of U Po Kyin

Kyin begins his life as a beggar who later climbs the ladder of success

until he has a position of a Sub-divisional magistrate in the British colonial

government. This shows that he is placed at the margin of the colonized

society. When he holds the position such as a Sub-divisional magistrate he

will always pursue a higher position as a Deputy Commissioner. Ashcroft

uses Edward Said’s terms “a process of conscious affiliation proceeding from

a desire not only to be accepted but to be adopted and absorbed” (Ashcroft,

2002:4). Ashcroft comments that those who are at the periphery of

colonization society are going to unite and abandon their origins. Kyin is

undergoing this process since he dreams and decides to work for the British

when he was a little boy. He then keeps the intention growing by plotting his

way to get the merits of his work.

Kyin’s effort to mimic the colonizer, the British, is seen according to

Bhabha as “desire of the reformed” (Bhabha, 2004:122). Kyin rejects as well

as accepts the idea of being colonized who is placed at the periphery of

colonialization. He and other Burmese are the subjects of colonialization who

are excessively abused by the power of the British. However, he is benefited


46

by having the position of a Sub-divisional magistrate. This gives him a better

opportunity to launch another dream to be like the British socially. Entering

the Club is a perfect ambition to him.

1. Mimicry of U Po Kyin

The initial moment of the process of mimicry is when U Po Kyin

delivers the idea of being the member of the European Club to his wife.

After she hears her husband delivers the idea, she begins to imagine what

will happen if she is the wife of the member of the Club. She comments

that “talking to English ladies in Hindustani about baby-linen” would

amaze for any women in her community. This amplifies that the motive of

being chosen as a member in the club for Kyin’s family is not only to get

respected by local natives. This also articulates the idea of being the

European alike.

Historically, when the British issued a diarchy rule in 1923, only a

small number of the Burmese politicians were allowed to attend the

parliament’s session. This rule also affects any British Clubs all over the

country. Most British bitterly accept the present of Burmese in their clubs.

However, many reject the Burmese to come to the Clubs. In Burmese

Days, one of typical reason was represented by Ellis. He says:

It’s all very well, but I stick to what I said. No natives in this Club!It’s constantly giving way over small things like that that we’veruined the Empire. This country’s only rotten with sedition becausewe’ve been too soft with them. The only possible policy is to treat‘em like dirt they are. This is a critical moment, and we want everybit of prestige we can get. We’ve got to hang together and say, ‘Weare the masters and you beggars-‘“ Ellis pressed his small thumb


47

down as though flattening a grub-“you beggars keep your place!’(Orwell, 1934:32)

This can be seen as the evidence on how the diarchy policy that issued by

British Raj in Burma is not well accepted in most British societies in

Burma as pictured by Orwell in the novel.

Larkin has a rare opportunity to interview a Burmese whose father

was a district magistrate during the British colonial government in 1920’s

in Burma. The Burmese named Htin Aung talked to her that his father is

invited to join the local club. He mentions that his father is forced to

accept the membership (Larkin, 2011:189). His father does not enjoy the

privilege of being the member of the club as he only visits the clubs

several times on social duty not leisure time.

On the other hand, this fact is apparently reversed by Orwell as he

characterizes Kyin as a magistrate who is willing to blackmail and scheme

his way to obtain the membership of the Club. Orwell’s intention can be

seen as an attempt to provide the space for Kyin to possess power as well

as the ability to mimic the British by choice not by force as the policy said.

Kyin is described as a corrupt man since the beginning of the

novel. The way he reaches his positon as a Magistrate is not ‘innocent’

from the start. Thus, he managed to secure his positon as he always

employs clever tricks such as receives the bribes. He also makes a private

taxation system for villagers in order get more money. Those who refute

would be terrorized by “gangs of dacoits attacked the village, leading


48

villagers were arrested on false charge, and so forth” (Orwell, 1934:7).

These terrors are motorized by Kyin.

In postcolonial discourse, the act of Kyin terrorizing his own

fellow (other Burmese) is seen as an attempt to mimic the colonizer. The

nature of colonizer, indeed, always includes power relation as the based on

every interaction. This can be seen from the bipolarity of superior and

inferior represented by the British and Burmese. Kyin rejects his Burmese

identity because Burmese is the subject of the British colonialization. This

corresponds to Bhabha’s concept of mimicry. He says mimicry is “the

desire for reform, the recognizable other”. In this case, Kyin wants to

‘differ’ himself from the Other, the subject of colonization.

Kyin does not only blatantly mimic the British but he also realizes

that colonization is strongly emphasized on the element of racism. As

explained in the earlier part of this study, the British see Burmese as

inferior race. For instance, under the ferocious heat of Burma sun, the

British have to wear protection for their head as they are not used to such

extreme heat. However, Burmese were seen off not wearing any

protection. The British conclude that Burmese have thick skull. The fact

that the British differ themselves biologically from Burmese established

racist relation because they notice Burmese are ‘savage’ and less human as

they had no problem with the heat.

Kyin benefits himself from this situation by conducting corrupt

practices. Taking bribery is only one of his methods of gaining more


49

money illegally. When there is a case under his jurisdiction, he decided the

disputed sincerely on valid legal conditions but under the table he

demanded certain amount of money from both sides. He was so clever to

exploit the racism of the British because “no British officer will ever

believe anything against his own men” (Orwell, 1934:7). Kyin is counted

as a British officer in that sense because he is a Sub-divisional magistrate

under the colonial government.

There is a riot outside the Club because the crowd inquiries one of

the European to be condemned. This particular European shoots one of the

local natives during a chaos. Ac he unnecessarily shot a local who would

not harm him in any ways. The riot itself is not the part of Kyin’s grand

plan of devastating the good name of Dr. Verasvami. However, Kyin

seizes the opportunity to take the credits to suppress the angry crowd.

Orwell narrates that: “He had been lying low until the danger should be

over, and now was hurrying forth to grab a share of any credit that might

be going.” (Orwell, 1934:254). This signifies Kyin effort to mimic the

Colonizer as he denies the fact that he is the member of the local society.

This reaction is seen as an attempt to differ himself from the local natives.

Another event amplifies Kyin’s effort to be European like. The

doctor receives support no more from Flory as Flory has committed

suicide. Kyin finally launches his final accusation to obtain his objective to

get membership of the club. Dr. Verasvami indeed is destroyed. The

Europeans think that he is a scoundrel even though they have no specific


50

reason why they should believe so. The doctor also has been labelled as

the “shok de”; a Burmese phrase, whose meaning equals to untrustworthy

no to be exact. When a native is labeled by this, it means “there is an end

of him” (Orwell, 1934:283). Unlike the doctor, Kyin is profited otherwise.

This shows that Kyin successfully differs himself from Dr. Verasvami.

The doctor symbolizes the local society while Kyin is now left off to be

European like because of the membership.

2. The Result of Mimicry

The result of mimicry is ambivalence. Mimicry emphasizes its process

rather than the result. The result of mimicry will not be able to produce

new characteristics. In the postcolonial discourse, mimicry will affect the

local natives because they will transform into the British described as

‘almost the same but not quite’. Those who try to mimic the British will

not get the same status as them. Kyin is trapped in the illusion he has been

dreaming about. In the beginning of the novel, Kyin is described as a Sub-

divisional magistrate, a high ranking official for a local people (Orwell,

1934:5). His jurisdiction includes some villages in the discrict of

Kyauktada. To him, his position offered power and authority among his

people.

This is true since he arranges private taxation scheme to benefit him

himself while he also receives bribes from both sides but he solves the

dispute honestly. Because he solves any disputes fairly, it profits him with


51

respect as a loyal and skilled official to the British. However, the British

will not care about his corrupt practice for Kyin was one of the British

officials. Kyin is aware of this that he keeps continuing his corrupt

practices since he believes the British would not believe the accusation

thrown against his own men (Orwell, 1934:7). He will pile up dozen

witnesses if any accusation or trial of his practices. He will always get

away with it.

Macaulay’s example of a group translator in India provides clear

picture of how the ambivalence of mimicry occurs. He comments on class

structure in India under the British colonialization. They are the colonizer,

the British, mimic man, and millions whom the British govern, the

common people (Bhabha, 1994:87). What he means by mimic man is a

group of Indian who receives colonial education to be translators. The

translator group is no longer included in the group with millions others but

they form a new social class. However, having received the colonial

education job as translators, they remain powerless. Their status as

colonial subject is not lifted altogether.

In this case, Kyin is considered in the group of mimic man in India.

His position offers him a lot of privileges as a Sub-divisional magistrate.

The British will not look up upon him neither as a respected Burmese nor

as a noble man since the British was understand of the nature of Kyin very

well. He will remain as a colonial subject. According to the history, when

the British annex Burma, they replace truthful of head villagers with a


52

handful of corrupt Burmese officials (Larkin, 2011:67). They believe

corrupt Burmese officials are easy to be controlled as they let them to

continue terrorizing villagers instead of protecting them. They are also

trapped in the ambivalence of mimicry discourse because Kyin is

‘translator’ whose power is a little compare to the British officials.

Kyin’s membership of the Club does not change how the British

members of the Club judge Burmese people. Although, naturally, they will

elect Dr. Verasvami, they are thankful when they finally choose Kyin

instead. Their attitude is pictured in:

In the end the other Europeans came to be rather glad that they hadelected him, for he was bearable addition to the Club. He did not cometoo often, was ingratiating in his manner, stood drinks freely, anddeveloped almost at once into a brilliant bridge-player. (Orwell,1934:285)

They are glad because Kyin is almost unnoticed to them because he does

not come too often. So, his presence in the Club is not considered as

important. On the other hand, this symbolizes that Kyin is successfully

mimic the British because he is now able to socialize with the rest of the

member by acquiring a skill to be a brilliant bridge-player. His

significance to the Club is only his privilege of entering the Club. He does

not represent any Burmese politically and he has no power in Club to

express his opinion.

When Kyin has achieved everything more than he has been dreaming

about, he fails to redeem his sins by building pagodas. This is an

ambivalence result of mimicry because he still considers himself as a


53

devoted Burmese. It is the moment for him to atone for his sins as stated in

“U Po Kyin had done all that mortal man could do. It was time now to be

making ready for the next world - in short, to begin building pagodas.”

(Orwell, 1934:286). In the earlier part of this study, when Kyin begins to

blackmail and scheme Dr. Verasvami, he was warned that one day he has

to redeem his evildoings by building pagodas. Unfortunately, it is not long

after he is granted an award by the British governor, he is stricken by

apoplexy. He is dead several days afterwards.

Pagodas are the center of Burmese people as devoted Buddhist. The

idea of Kyin remembers his atonement of building pagoda show that he is

still attached to Burmese culture. Like Macaulay’s example, the translators

group in India who he considers them to be powerless because of selective

knowledge they acquire from the British, Kyin is also powerless. He could

not fulfill his duty as a Buddhist. This is also a sign of difference and the

lack of authority for Kyin. He is different than the British although he has

the highest position for the local natives can get in the government of

British colonial. He still has to perform his duty as a Burmese and

Buddhist. On the other hand, Kyin can be seen as an example for other

Burmese. Kyin is a signification for Burmese because they can reach such

a high position in the British colonial government.


54

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION

This chapter sums the ideas discussed in the analysis. In the first research

question the writer point out how U Po Kyin suffers from identity crisis. By

analyzing the characterization of Kyin, the writer would be able to start to set a

distance from the plot as a whole. He is characterized a corrupt official. He is also

portrayed as an evil character as he always finds a way to denigrate his rival in

order to get the membership of the Club. Kyin nurtures his admiration towards the

British since he was little. This shows how Kyin begins to content with the idea of

fighting for the British instead of Burmese. Although, this happens when he is

child, the idea does not disappear but grow. This happens because Kyin self-

image of being burmese is denigrated by the presence of the British. When he

finally holds a quite high ranking local official as a Sub-divisional magistrate with

several villages under him jurisdiction, his ambition to fight for the British

transforms into entering ‘the Club’.

The Club represents a new signifier for Kyin’s ambition to fight for the

British. Now, his ambition to fight for the British is replaced but the idea is still

the same. The Club also represents Kyin’s condition as he suffers from crisis of

identity. He realizes the importance of the Club. In order to elevate his social

status among the local natives, the Club offers him with a lot of privileges. He

believes those privileges will erase his inferiority status in front of the British.

In the second problem formulation, it is when Kyin begins to launch his

devilish plan in order to crumble Dr. Verasvami, he starts to mimic the British.


55

Dr. Veraswami represents the local society. That is why it is important for Kyin to

destroy the image of Dr. Verasvami. This also corresponds with the idea of

mimicry as a repetition. In this case, he represents what the British have done to

his society. Abusing Dr. Veraswami repeats the action of the British abusing the

local natives.

Even though Kyin is warned by his wife that he has to atone for sins by

building pagodas, Kyin makes his way to get the membership. His blackmails and

scheme successfully destroy the good image of Dr. Verasvami. His presence at the

Club is occasional. When he is at the Club, he has found a way to socialize with

the British by being a good bridge-player. Other impact of his presence is almost

none because he does not represent any Burmese to voice his opinion in the Club.

He takes the Club a place to spend some leisure time. This again corresponds to

the idea that mimicry is not a representation.

The result of mimicry is ambivalence. His failure of building pagodas to

gain merits to atone his evildoings signifies that he still lacks of authority. He is

indeed promoted even further so that he achieves a medal of honor from the

British Governor. He is also wealthier than ever as he keeps doing his corrupt

practices by taking bribes. However, these all do not provide him enough power

to perform his duty as a devoted Buddhist and Burmese. He is still a postcolonial

subject because he cannot fully attach himself from the Buddhist and Burmese

tradition. On the other hand, the British also consider him just the same like other

Burmese as the colonial subject.


56

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abrams, M.H. and Geoffrey G. Harpham. Glossary of Literary Terms, 9th

Edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2009.

Aschroft, Bill and Gareth Griffiths and Hellen Tiffin. The Empire WritesBack. New York: Routledge, 2002.

Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and CulturalTheory, 3rd Edition. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press,2009.

Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Classics ed. London:Routledge, 2004.

“Burmese Days”. Wikipedia. Wikimedia. August 15, 2015.(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burmese_Days). September 12, 2015.

Gopinath, Praseeda. “AN ORPHANED MANLINESS: THE PUKKASAHIB AND THE END OF EMPIRE IN "A PASSAGE TO INDIA" AND"BURMESE DAYS"”. Studies in the Novel, Vol. 41, No. 2 (summer 2009), pp.201-223. The Johns Hopkins University Press.(http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027148). August 5, 2016.

Holman, C Hugh and William Harmon. A Handbook to Literature, 5th

Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986

Guerin, Wilfred L. Earle Labor, Lee Morgan, and John R. Willingham. AHandbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, 6th Edition. Oxford and NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Larkin, Emma. Finding Orwell in Burma. London and New York: PenguinBooks, 2006.

Lee, Robert A. “Symbol and Structure in Burmese Days : A Revaluation”.Texas Studies in Literature and Language, Vol. 11, No. 1 (Spring 1969), pp. 819-835 University of Texas Press.( http://www.jstor.org/stable/40754032). August 5,2016.

Loomba, Ania. Colonialism/Postcolonialism. London and New York:Routledge, 2005.

Orwell, George. Burmese Days. New York: Harcourt, 1934.

Orwell, George. Collected Essay. London: Mercury Books, 1961.


57

Phyo Tha, Kyaw. Orwell’s ‘Burmese Days’ Wins Govt Literary Award.The Irrawaddy. November 19, 2013. (http://www.irrawaddy.com/burma/orwells-burmese-days-wins-govt-literary-award.html). August 5, 2016.

Poznar, Walter. “Orwell and Little Brother”. College Literature, Vol. 12,No. 3 (Fall, 1985), pp. 258-265. The Johns Hopkins University Press.(http://www.jstor.org/stable/25111672). August 3, 2016.

Rai, Alok. “Colonial Fictions: Orwell's 'Burmese Days'”. Economic andPolitical Weekly, Vol. 18, No. 5 (Jan. 29, 1983), pp. PE47-PE52. Economic andPolitical Weekly.( http://www.jstor.org/stable/4371800). August 5, 2016.

Roberts, Edgar V. and Henry E. Jacobs. Fiction: An Introduction toReading and Writing. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1987.

Rutherford, Jonathan. Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London:Lawrence & Wishart Limited, 1990.

“Why I write”. George Orwell. 1946(http://web.calstatela.edu/faculty/jgarret/308/readings-4.pdf). June 3, 2015.

Wiharyanto, Kardiyat A. Asia Tenggara Zaman Pranasionalisme.Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2005.


crisis of identity and mimicry in orwell’s - usd … · crisis of identity and mimicry in...

Documents