crawl, walk, run - energy efficiency program library walk, run working together to advance emerging...
TRANSCRIPT
Crawl, Walk, Run Working Together to Advance Emerging Technologies
John Taylor September 28, 2017 Minneapolis, MN
2
What are Emerging Opportunities?
3
Emerging Technology
What is a Promising ET?
CEE
Market Transformation
Industry
Relevance to Members
Technical Potential
Consumers
Indicators of Market Change
Key Stakeholder Relationships
Unique CEE Role
Alignment with CEE Mission
Fills a Gap
Other Potential Assets
Level of Effort Required
Time Frame
Program Potential
4
Strategies for Advancing ETs
5
Collective Impact
If you can’t fly, run. If you can’t run, walk. If you can’t walk, crawl. But, by all means keep moving. -Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
6
Agenda
Chris Pulfer, on behalf of FortisBC • Gas Heat Pumps
Terry McGowan, American Lighting Association • Residential Lighting Technologies
Robert Wilkins, AHRI • Connected HVAC Equipment
Gas Fired Heat Pumps Prefeasibility Study Results
Proprietary and Confidential 7
Chris Pulfer Consultant to FortisBC & Principal, Posterity Group
Jim Kobialko Program Manager, Innovative Technologies & Projects
CESIG
• FEU gas • 862,000 Residential • 93,000 Commercial • 900 Industrial
• FBC electric
• 142,000 Residential • 16,500 Commercial • 50 Industrial • 4,000 Other
About FortisBC
8
…identify market-ready technologies that are not yet widely adopted … which are suitable for …DSM programs ...
FortisBC’s Innovative Technologies Program Area
…This is accomplished
through pilot and demonstration projects, pre-feasibility studies and the use of Industry Standard EM&V protocols to validate manufacturers’ claims...
FortisBC’s Innovative Technologies Program Area
FortisBC has been conducting DSM for a long time, most of the “low-hanging energy efficiency fruit” is gone
Many provincial jurisdictions have relatively stringent energy codes. In our heating-dominated climate, focus skews to natural gas end use, a particular issue for gas utilities
Federal and Provincial MEPS are stringent, and becoming more so
Pan-Canadian Framework: GHG Targets
Introduction – The Problem(s)
Introduction – The Problem
Why GHPs?
13
What are Gas Fired Heat Pumps
14
Codes and Standards
5
There is currently no Minimum Efficient Performance Standards for natural gas heat pumps it the United States or Canada.
CSA has certified some Robur absorption heat pump models for safety in Canada under the relevant ANSI standard
ANSI also maintains a performance testing and rating standard
Baseline Descriptions
Vintage Heating/DHW Loads
Res Baseline Heating Equipment
Comm. Baseline Heating Equipment
Existing (retrofit)
As per 2011 FortisBC Conservation Potential Study
Forced-air furnace, 92% AFUE with ECM Boiler – 80% AFUE DHW – 0.625 EF
Heating (RTU or Boiler) – 80% DHW - 80%
New
As per 2011 FortisBC Conservation Potential Study
Forced-air furnace, 92% AFUE with ECM Boiler – 90% AFUE DHW – 0.625 EF
Heating (RTU or Boiler) – 80% DHW - 80%
6
Coefficient of Performance (COP)
Vintage Coastal Interior Space Heat 1.20 1.15
DHW 1.40 1.30
SH + DHW (Res Only) 1.24 1.18
8
Residential Savings Summary
Subsector Measure Life (years)
Upgrade Incremental
Cost
Gas Savings Per Measure
Retrofit 15 years $6,935 19.6 GJ/yr
New 15 years $5,558 17.3 GJ/yr
11
Commercial Savings Summary
Subsector Measure Life (years)
Upgrade Incremental
Cost
Gas Savings Per
Measure
Retrofit 15 years $19,991 271 GJ/yr
New 15 years $20,751 265 GJ/yr
12
Market Opportunity - Summary
Annual Achievable Potential
Residential 7,200 - 14,500 (retrofit)
650-1,300 (new)
Commercial 300 - 600 (retrofit)
20-50 (new)
13
Key Obstacles to Increased Uptake
Market Barriers • Lack of supply and knowledgeable contractors • Availability, performance, cost, and introduction of
pre-commercial technology
Informational Barriers • Lack of information on energy performance Market
actor awareness
Financial Barriers • High capital cost
Key Knowledge Gaps & Recommendations
Gap #1 Energy performance of gas heat pumps in British Columbia remain uncertain Gap #2 Given early market entry period, current technology costs are uncertain.
Find FortisBC at:
Fortisbc.com
talkingenergy.ca
604-576-7000
For further information, please contact:
Thank you
Jim Kobialko
Chris Pulfer
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
The Lighting for Tomorrow Success
Story
Transforming Residential Lighting Lighting for Tomorrow has recognized exceptional new lighting products since
2002. Each year, the sponsors and co-sponsors of this unique and successful
industry partnership consider the market barriers that inhibit the adoption and use of energy efficient residential lighting.
They work together to create product categories and criteria that take into account evolving lighting technology and strive to support its successful
integration into lamps, retrofit kits, fixtures and controls to help ensure that these products will meet consumer needs.
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
2017 Competition
Awards
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
The Lighting for Tomorrow Success Story Transforming Residential Lighting
The Challenge: How to transform a 100+ year old consumer market to effectively use a new, unfamiliar and more costly technology base. What makes LFT work?
– Focus on the Consumer – Industry “Buy In” – The Challenge of a Competition – Changing and Anticipating the Market – The Awards Include One Year of Product Promotion/Publicity – Qualified Judges – Lighting Retailers, Designers, Electric Utilities,
Testing/Standards, Energy Programs, Industry Media – ENERGY STAR Certified Products – Sponsor Financial and In-Kind Support
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
Comfort. Beauty. Lifestyle.
Lighting is more than just “parts” - bulbs and fixtures. It enables us all to live our lives. Each year, the Lighting for Tomorrow competition judges handpick high efficiency lighting products that best blend form and function through
inspired design. The end goal? Better lighting, and better living.
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
The Last 15 Years of Lighting for Tomorrow Transforming Lighting
How Lighting for Tomorrow Encouraged Efficient LED Filament Lamps
2014 2015 2016
LF T Category No standalone category
Special entry category underscores efficiency and light quality characteristics; new bulb shapes and filament styles emerging
Percentage of All Lamp Entries 3% 45% 92%
Average Efficacy of Entries 89 lm/W 98 lm/W
LFT Product Awards
ENERGY STAR Filament lamps not eligible for certification
Expanded scope to include lower color temperature LED filament lamps; 280+ products listed as of August 2017
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
A Legacy of Lighting Industry Leadership
First LEDs
Lighting Controls
OLED & Connected
Lighting
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
What We Learned in 2017: New Directions in Lighting Artistry
• Designer use of various materials to achieve functional lighting and a sophisticated artistic appearance
• LEDs offer new possibilities – Mounted in close proximity to
heat-sensitive materials, not limited to standard sockets configurations
Trends
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
What We Learned in 2017: Connected or “Smart” Lighting
• A drive for simplicity – Making connected products as
easy to set up and use as possible
• Communication protocols increasingly invisible to installers and users – Data translations happen
automatically using wireless Bluetooth® or home Wi-Fi systems
Trends
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
What We Learned in 2017: Thinner and Thinner
• Optical Plastics and LEDs: designed to uniformly edge light large diffuse surfaces – Ceiling fixtures with flat
luminous surfaces – Traditional thin or slim under-
cabinet fixtures • Not limited to a single color
tone with the arrays of color-changing LEDs
Trends
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
What We Learned in 2017: “Filament” Bulbs – Larger and More Decorative
• Increase in light output ratings suggesting that these bulbs are now functional light sources
• Larger and more decorative bulb shapes enclosing decorative and increasingly intricate LED filament structures
Trends
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
What We Learned in 2017: One Luminaire = Multiple Layers of Light
• Ambient, task, and accent lighting can be built into a single luminaire and then combined via controls to achieve the desired lighting result. – More manufacturers are integrating
multiple layers into a single product.
Trends
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
Competition Sponsors
American Lighting Association
Consortium for Energy Efficiency UL
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
Competition Co-Sponsors
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
Judging Criteria
• Efficacy • Customer experience • Light quality • Innovation • Non-energy impacts
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
2017 Judging Panel
Name Organization Rolf Bergman Rolf Bergman Consulting
Eric Borden Pathfinder Consultants
David Edwards UL
Jeff LeBrun DTE Energy
Linda Longo enLIGHTenment
Candyce Marsh Duke Energy
Jodie Orange Living Lighting
Erik Page Erik Page & Associates
Bjarne Pedersen Architectural Lighting Design, Inc.
Greg Spigner Ferguson, a Wolseley Company
Tim Stumm Lights Fantastic Dallas
2017 • Competition Awards lightingfortomorrow.com
• What’s Next • For LFT?
Terry McGowan - [email protected]
Draft AHRI Standard 1380 Demand-Response-Ready Variable-Capacity Air-Conditioning Equipment <65,000 Btuh
Robert Wilkins CEE Industry Partners Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota September 27-28, 2017
42
I am here to share my personal experience and lessons learned as chairman of the AHRI technical committee that developed the draft standard. My remarks may not necessarily represent the views of AHRI or its member companies. Robert Wilkins
Notice
43
Topics
2012: Why a Standard for DR Ready VC HVAC Equipment?
Brief Summary of the Draft Standard
Benefits to Utilities
Benefits to Manufacturers
Potential Next Steps for Utilities
Lessons Learned from the Process
Composition of the Technical Committee
Other Suggestions for Future CEE Emerging Technology Initiatives
44
2012: Why a Standard for DR Ready VC HVAC Equipment?
AHRI leadership identified a confluence of issues and opportunities
Utility issues in 2012 • Growing pressure to save energy, reduce carbon and manage peaks • Closure of coal-fired and nuclear generating stations • New, sharper utility peaks caused by growing solar generation • Aging of existing load control communication systems
Technology opportunities in 2012 • Inverter technology maturing and coming to US-style HVAC • New, enhanced demand response communication systems available
This confluence of developments made developing our Standard timely
45
Brief Summary of Draft Standard: Highlights of Operation
Communication CTA-2045 and/or OpenADR 2.0
Configuration signals To automate enrollment/connection process
Cooling operation: General curtailment Critical curtailment Grid emergency
Benchmark at rated load power (95˚F) Max input power capped at 30% below benchmark Max input power capped at 60% below benchmark Turn off equipment (not for control strategy)
Heat pump operation: General curtailment Critical curtailment
Benchmark at rated load power (47˚F) Max input power capped at 30% below benchmark Turn off resistance heat
Some other provisions include: • Advance notification of DR event • Return acknowledgment of signals and diagnostic data upon request • Load-up function • Customer override provision with notification to the utility
46
Benefits to Utilities
• VCAC is very effective to reduce peak loads • Energy efficiency rises during demand response events • Much more effective than costly increases in minimum EER ratings
• Parallel increases in energy efficiency (18 to 21 SEER)
• Addresses needs to expand/modernize old load control systems
• Modern communication systems improve DR performance and reliability
• Raises confidence that systems will perform when needed • Avoids need for equipment modification; reduces truck rolls
• Capable of both direct load control and peak load price programs
• Less impact on indoor comfort than compressor cycling or thermostat
setback strategies
47
Benefits to Manufacturers
• Increases opportunities to sell higher efficiency products • Especially inverter driven products
• Provides better way to reduce utility peak loads versus increasing EER
• Reduces focus on costly EER ratings.
• Could stimulate utility incentives • Demand response incentives, in parallel with • Energy efficiency incentives
• Attractive product to replace old, inefficient equipment in field
• Especially in stressed substations or circuits
48
Potential Next Steps for Utilities
• Consider future plans for your DR program and technology • Direct load control program, or • Peak load pricing program
• Consider new communication technology
• OpenADR2.0, or • CTA2045 as a “bridge” to existing communication system, or • CTA2045 as a “bridge” to new communication system
• Consider coordinating or integrating DR and EE programs and
incentives to benefit from parallel • Superior DR performance • Superior EE performance
• Discuss your plans with manufacturers now planning their products
• Continue the collaboration
49
Lessons Learned from the Process • Identify and focus on the target opportunity:
• Avoid trying to do everything for everybody • Save good but tangential ideas for future projects
• Chart the path forward. Early on, we developed:
• A white paper • Our future state vision • Roadmap (a process flow chart) to the future state
• A strong cross section of TC participants leads to collaboration and a
shared understanding of both industries’ situations: • Utility demand response programs, technologies and constraints • Manufacturer capabilities plus technical and regulatory constraints
• Be willing to negotiate and compromise
50
Composition of Technical Committee: A Strong Cross Section
Manufacturers Carrier Daikin Emerson Fujitsu Ingersoll Rand Johnson Controls Nortek Rheem Others at times
Utilities Duke Energy Pacific Gas & Electric Southern Cal Edison Others at times
Organizations AHRI CEE EPA Energy Star EPRI Others at times
Participants gained both an understanding of demand response programs and technologies, and respect for both industries’ concerns, needs and issues. This has led to strong collaboration and cooperation.
51
Other Suggestions for Future CEE Emerging Technology Initiatives • Identify target opportunities with meaningful benefits for both
• Utilities, and • Manufacturers
• Identify and co-opt supporting entities, e.g.,
• CEE • EPRI • Manufacturers’ trade associations • Technical societies and alliances • Government agencies / national laboratories • Universities
• If possible, enlist participants with both utility and manufacturer
experience.
52
Thank you!
Robert Wilkins 160 Creek Water Lane Arnold, Maryland 21012 443-794-0998 [email protected]
53
DISCUSSION