cpcb - 10th meeting - experts appraisal committee - 29-30 april, 2010

MINUTES OF THE 10th MEETING OF THE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE-2 (INDUSTRY) HELD DURING 29th- 30th April, 2010 AT SCOPE COMPLEX, CORE 6, 5TH FLOOR, IOCL CONFERENCE ROOM, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI -110 003 Opening Remarks of the Chairman

The Chairman welcomed the Members and thereafter agenda items were taken for deliberation.

A list of participants is annexed. Shri Niranjan Raghunath Raje could not

attend the meeting due to his pre-commitment.

9.1. Confirmation of the Minutes of the 8th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee-2 (Industry) held on 9th - 10th February, 2010.

The Minutes of the 9th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee-2

(Industry) held on 18th -19th March, 2010 were confirmed. 9.2. Consideration of the Projects 29th April, 2010 10.2.1 Expansion of Production Capacity of hard Carbon Black from 225

TPD to 365 TPD and Cogeneration Power Plant capacity from 16 MW to 18 MW at Village: Moka, Taluka: Mundra, District Kuchchh in Gujarat by M/s Philips Carbon Black Limited - Reg. Environmental Clearance

The project authorities and their consultant San Enviortech Pvt. Limited,

Ahmedabad gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The project was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee-2 (Industry) in its meeting held during 23-24th October, 2009 to prescribe the Terms of Reference. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking EIA study and exempted the project from public hearing as per para 7(ii) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 as the expansion will be carried within the existing unit. No additional land is required and there will be zero discharge of effluent. Tail gas generated from the process will be used as fuel for the power generation. Public hearing for the existing capacity was held on 23rd May, 2008 as per the procedures laid in the EIA Notification 2006.

The project activity is listed at 5 (c) and is of ?A? category and therefore require environmental clearance.

M/s Phillips Carbon Black Limited have proposed for expansion of production capacity of carbon black from 225 TPD (80,000 TPA) to 365 TPD (130,000 TPA) and cogeneration power plant capacity from 16 MW to 22 MW based on waste gas at Village: Moka, Taluk: Mundra, District: Kachchh in Gujarat. Environmental clearance for existing capacity was accorded vide letter no. J-11011/590/2007-IA-II (I) dated 19.08.2008. Public hearing was held on 23.05.2008. Construction activity of the existing unit is going on. Production has not been started. Proposed expansion will be within the existing unit having land area of 60 acres. The total cost of the project is Rs. 255 Crores.

Major raw material feed stock for production of carbon black will be a dark brown liquid, the heavy end product of crude oil low sulphur refining. This will be obtained from the refineries of the country and will be imported as required. Molasses solution will be used as binder for beading/ pelletizing. In the process of carbon black manufacturing, the feed stock which is liquid HC of petroleum and coal tar origin is cracked in a reactor in the deficiency of the air and under carefully controlled conditions. As a result of this, cracking is a part of feed stock and is transformed into carbon black. Resultant smoke is cooled and passed through bag filters and carbon gets separated from gas. The by product off ?gas at a temperature of 200 deg C will be burnt in a boiler to run a steam turbine generator to generate the power.

Water requirement will increase from 955 m3/day to 1200 m3/day and will be sourced from Gujarat Water Infrastructures Limited ? Mundra. Out of 1200 m3/day of water requirement, 221 m3/day of the water requirement will be met through the recycled treated waste water. Effluent (281 m3/day) will be treated in ETP and treated effluent will be used for green belt. Domestic effluent (50 m3/day) will be disposed through septic tank/soak pit. Power requirement will be met from the CPP. Tail gas generated from process will be used as fuel for power generation. Bag filters will be provided to control the particulate emissions from the boiler.

ETP sludge (85 kg/day) will be sent to TSDF site approved by GPCB. Used oil (0.05 kl/month) will be sold to registered recyclers with CPCB. Used lead batteries (if generated) will be sold to authorized dealers/recyclers. The project Proponent also informed the Committee that environmental clearance for the expansion project of Soft Carbon Black 140 TPD and 12 MW Cogeneration Power Plant at Cochin was accorded by MoEF letter dated 03.07.2008. The carbon black project was stalled due to global slowdown and reduction of customer demand in south India. Considering the increase in tyre demand in Gujarat region, it is proposed to set up the same carbon black project at Mundra in place of Cochin.

The Committee wanted to know the sulfur content in the feed stock. To this, PP informed the committee that the feed stock is imported which has sulfur content of more than 2%. Feed stock obtained from Reliance, Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. and Barauni has sulfur content 0.5%, 0.9% and 2.5%

respectively. The committee advised the proponent that only low sulfur feed stock shall be used having sulfur content not exceeding 2%. They also apprised the committee about the standards evolved by CPCB regarding Carbon Black manufacturing Industry.

As per the CPCB standards, the industry should blend the carbon feed

stock so that average sulfur content does not exceed 3%. The Committee deliberated on the issue of sulfur balance, removal of

sulfur from flue gas, air quality modeling and risk & safety aspects etc. After detailed deliberation, the committee sought following additional information for reconsideration of project:

1. Detailed sulfur balance of feed stock based on actual monitoring. 2. Sulfur content in the feed stock and product along with quantity 3. Data on continuous stack monitoring of SO2 4. Explore the possibility of removal of Sulfur from the flue gas by installation of

FGD. 5. Analysis of Carbon Black particles from the stack for the HCN. 6. Hourly meteorological data, mixing height and stack coordinates. 7. Isopleths need to be rechecked and impacts should match with the wind

pattern. 8. Risk Assessment of dust explosion hazards.

The Committee also decided that on receipt of above information, site inspection shall be carried by the following members of the Committee:

1. Chairman 2. Sh. S.K. Hazra 3. Representative of the MoEF

10.2.2 Expansion of molasses based distillery (from 20 KLD to 60 KLD) at

Block No. 459/1, Village Garag, District Dharwad in Karnataka by M/s Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Distilleries Private Limited ? Reg. Environmental Clearance

The proposal regarding expansion of molasses based distillery from 20

KLD to 60 KLD at Village Garag in District Dharwad in Karnataka by M/s Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Distilleries Private Limited was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 86th meeting held on 20th - 22nd October, 2008. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the Final EIA report to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. Public hearing was exempted as per Para 7 (ii) of EIA Notification, 2006 as expansion is to be carried with in the existing unit for which no additional land is required and there is a zero discharge of effluent.

All molasses based distilleries are listed at Sl. No. 5(g) of schedule of EIA notification, 2006 under category ?A? and appraised at central level.

M/s Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Distilleries Private Limited and their consultant Ramky Enviro Engineers Limited, Hyderabad gave detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures. The proponent have proposed for expansion of molasses based distillery from 20 KLD to 60 KLD to manufacture extra neutral alcohol / rectified spirit in District Dharwad, Karnataka. No eco-sensitive areas are located within 15 km periphery of the plant. The proposed expansion will be carried with in the existing distillery premises covering an area of 116 acres of which an area of 40 acres will be covered under green belt. The unit will operate for 300 days. The total cost of the project will be Rs. 15 Crores.

The actual water requirement would be 2215 KLD. The fresh water

requirement would be 1228 KLD after reuse of water from RO, permeate, spent lees, condensate which will be met from the ground water source. The major source of water pollution from distilleries is the spent wash. About 720 KLD of spent wash will be generated which after concentration in the MEE will be incinerated in the boiler to achieve zero discharge. About 463 KLD of effluent would be generated from boiler, cooling tower and plant washing which after neutralization and secondary treatment will be utilized for green belt and quenching of boiler ash.

The dried potash powder will be used for power generation after mixing

with coal. The condensate will be used for dilution and cooling tower make-up. The carbon-di-oxide generated during fermentation reaction will be compressed and sold out for further use. The steam requirement is met from a high pressure boiler (4TPH) and the high pressure steam (3Kg/cm2) will be utilized to generate 400 KW of energy for captive consumption. The steam leaving the turbines at 1.5 kg/cm2 back pressure is supplied for further distillation processes which are generally practiced at 300 mm of vacuum. It is proposed to install two number of DG sets of 500 KVA capacities each to meet the power requirement during the emergency. To control the particulate emissions from the boiler, a high efficiency multi-cyclone followed by back filter will be installed.

The solid waste will be generated in the form of Yeast sludge (7.5 TPD). ETP sludge (12 TPD) would be reused in compost making process. Sewage sludge will be used as manure for green belt. The boiler ash (7 TPD) shall be used as filler material in composting.

The committee noted that the predicted GLC values of NOx are 58.71

ug/m3 which are high and needs to be rechecked. The rechecked data shall be submitted to the ministry and circulated among the members of the committee.

The Committee noted that method of treatment of spent wash is as per the CPCB guidelines. The Committee after detailed deliberations recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to compliance of following additional specific conditions and submission of data regarding NOx:

1. The storage of spent wash shall not be more than 5 days. 2. Ground water quality monitoring shall be carried around the plant and

data submitted to the RO, MoEF/CPCB/SPCB. 3. The bagasse shall be stored in covered storage. 4. Fire Fighting System shall be as per the OISD-117 and cover all areas

where alcohol is produced, handled and stored. 5. Provision of foam system for fire fighting to control fire from the alcohol

storage tank. 6. Risk Assessment shall be carried to assess the fire and explosion risk

due to storage of alcohol and report submitted to the Ministry within six months.

7. The company shall undertake measures for water conservation and water consumption shall be brought down to 1500kl.

10.2.3 Modernization / Expansion of Sugar Mill from 3500 TCD to 7000 TCD

Cogeneration Power Plant from 10 MW to 33 MW at Village Randhawan, Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur in Punjab by M/s A.B. Sugars Limited ? Reg. Environmental Clearance

M/s A.B. Sugar have submitted a proposal for expansion of Sugar Mill from 3500 TCD to 7000 TCD and Cogeneration Power Plant from 10 MW to 33 MW at Village Randhawan, Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur in Punjab. Total cost of the project is Rs. 207.91 Crores.

The project activity is listed at 5 (J) in the schedule of EIA Notification,

2006 and is of ?B? category. However, considered at the central level as capacity of the co-generation power plant is more than 20 MW and is of ?A? category. Therefore, proposal has been considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee -2 at the Centre.

The company applied for environmental clearance to the Ministry on 9th October, 2007. The proposal was placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) in its meeting held on 13th -14th November, 2007. The Committee assessed the adequacy of EIA/EMP report and advised the project proponent to submit the report to the State Pollution Control Board for public hearing.

Subsequently, as SEIAA/SEAC for Punjab was constituted vide S.O. 1428 (E) dated 19th November, 2007, the file was transferred on 31.03.2008 to the

SEIAA as it was a ?B? category project. The company made a number of representations before the SEIAA/SEAC for exempting the expansion project of sugar mill and biomass based Cogen power plant from public hearing as public hearing for the distillery project situated in the same complex was earlier held in the year 2004.

Public hearing of the project was held on 6.11.2009. The SEIAA

considered the project in its meeting held on 30th January, 2010. However, SEIAA decided the file may be transferred to the Ministry as this is a ?A? category project as per the EIA Notification, 2006 amended on 1st December, 2009. As per the amendments, the biomass based power plant of capacity 20 MW and above are category ?A? project.

The issues raised during the public hearing were regarding, increasing the

production of sugar cane, effluent treatment , disposal of press mud , impact of flyash generated, employment opportunities etc. The proponent had addressed all the above issues

M/s A.B. Sugars Limited and their consultant M/s EST Consultants (P) Ltd

gave presentation on the salient features of the project and envisaged environment protection measures. It is proposed to enhance the capacity of sugar unit from 3500 TCD to 7000 TCD and capacity of cogen power plant from 10MW to 33MW in district Hoshiarpur and Punjab. Company has acquisition of 160 acres of land and another plot of 10 acres adjoining this land has also been purchased and would be utilized for the expansion of sugar mill and cogeneration power plant. The total area would be 170 acre.

It was noted that water requirement of 840 m3/d for the sugar mill during

the crushing season and 1800 m3/d for the co-gen power plant and 3485 m3/d for the cogen power plant during the off season will be met from the ground water source and also from the recycled water. No process effluent would be generated from the sugar mill. About 3300 m3/d of effluent would be generated. The effluent would be given primary and secondary treatment. The treated effluent after conforming to the prescribed standards will be used for land irrigation utilizing the Karnal Technology for Agro forestry.

To control the particulate emissions from the boilers, ESP will be installed

and emissions will be dispersed through stack of height as per State Pollution Control Board/CPCB standards. About 27,474 MTPA ash will be generated. It is estimated that during the 5 years about 13.74 acres of area will be required for disposal of ash for which the company has available area of 17 acres. The Committee advised the PP for ash management plan like disposal of ash to the cement plant and submit to the Ministry within 3 months.

The Committee noted that the proponent has not predicted that

incremental NOx concentration from Boiler Stack to assess its impacts on the

AAQ. The proponent has furnished the information after prediction of incremental NOx concentration. As per the prediction, the worst predicted 24 hourly concentrations for NOx is 2.051 ug/m3 occurring at a distance of 2.5 km from the emissions of 120 TPH sugar mill boiler. The overall concentration of NOx would be 17.451 ug/m3 which is much below the prescribed standards. Further, the Committee also noted that the values of SPM were also high. To this the PP clarified that the values of SPM are high as there was construction of National & State Highway. Regarding supply of molasses, it was informed that Punjab Govt. supplies the molasses during the off-season of sugar crushing.

The Committee after detailed deliberations recommended the project for

environmental clearance subject to stipulation of environment conditions: i. The storage capacity of treated effluent from sugar unit shall not

exceed 15 days. ii. The company shall monitor ground water quality around the plant

and the irrigation area and data shall be submitted to the Ministry?s regional office at Chandigarh/CPCB/State Pollution Control Board.

iii. The company shall monitor PM10, SO2 & NOx in the ambient air and the pH, BOD & TSS of the treated effluent and display the data on its website.

iv. The PP shall furnish detailed Ash management plan for disposal of ash from the boilers to the Ministry/RO of MoEF at Chandigarh within 3 months.

v. Risk assessment report shall be prepared and submitted to the Ministry within six months.

10.2.4 Molasses Based Distillery Unit of 30 KLPD Capacity located at Village

Paranda, District Osmanabad in Maharashtra by M/s. Bhairavnath Sugar Works Limited - Reg. Environmental Clearance 89

The proposal regarding Molasses Based Distillery Unit of 30 KLPD Capacity located at Village Paranda, District Osmanabad in Maharashtra by M/s. Bhairavnath Sugar Works Limited was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 89th meeting held on 22-23rd December, 2008. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the Final EIA report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing. The issues emerged during the public hearing and point-wise response to the issues raised shall be incorporated in the EIA report and final report submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

Public hearing of the project was held on 28th August, 2009. The issues

raised during the public hearing were regarding use of by products, control of water pollution, details of bio digester, control of particulate emissions, recovery

of CO2 and land earmarked for green belt etc. All the above issues were addressed

All molasses based distillery units irrespective of capacity and non

molasses based 30 KLPD and above are listed at Sl. No. 5(g) of schedule of EIA notification under category ?A? and will be appraised at central level.

M/s Bhairavnath Sugar Works Ltd. and their consultant Kingcraft?s

Environmental Rural Technology Institute, Pune and Mantras Resources, Nasik gave a detailed presentation on the project and envisaged environment protection measures. The proponent have submitted a proposal for 30 KLPD molasses based distillery to manufacture Rectified Spirit, Ethanol and Extra Neutral Alcohol based on continuous fermentation technology in District Osmanabad in Maharashtra. The total land area available is 130 acres and the distillery plant is proposed to be set up within the 2500 TCD sugar factory premises in an area of 25 acres. Area earmarked for green belt development is 8 acres. No forest land and R&R is involved. The unit will run for 270 days. Total cost of the project is Rs 22 Crores & will invest about Rs 2.43 crore capital & Rs 29.95 lacs recurring cost in pollution control measures.

The total water requirement of 500 M3/day will be met from the Kolegaon dam and existing bore well within sugar factory premises. It is proposed to adopt continuous fermentation technology. Spent wash generation will be @ 8kl / kl of alcohol produced and will be treated in bio-methanation plant followed by bio composting with press mud to achieve zero discharge. The power requirement of 0.8 MW will be met from the 15 MW Co-generation power plant. The sources of air emissions from the unit will be 10 TPH bagasse fired boilers. The gaseous emissions from the boiler will be dispersed through stack of 30 m height Solid waste generation will be in the form of yeast sludge (2 m3/day) and boiler ash. Yeast Sludge will be used as manure and fly ash will be used for land filling.

The Committee noted that the data regarding air quality, ground water quality and soil quality needs to be rechecked. Further, molasses requirement may not be sufficient from its own sugar unit. The Committee after detailed deliberations decided to seek the following additional information for reconsideration of the project. :

1. Details regarding source of molasses 2. Rechecked data on ground water quality, ambient air quality, and

soil quality

10.2.5 Proposed Molasses Based 30 KLPD Distillery Unit at Kasarsai-Darumbre, PO: Kasarsai, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune in Maharashtra by M/s. Shri Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Reg. Environmental Clearance

The proposal regarding Proposed Molasses Based 30 KLPD Distillery Unit at Kasarsai-Darumbre, PO: Kasarsai, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune in Maharashtra by M/s. Shri Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 83rd meeting held on 14-16th July, 2008. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the Final EIA report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing. The issues emerged during the public hearing and point-wise response to the issues raised shall be incorporated in the EIA report and final report submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

Public hearing of the project was held on 5.1.2010. The issues raised during the public hearing were regarding the capital investment, source of water, use of CO2 release due to fermentation, rainwater harvesting measures, technology to be adopted for zero discharge and provision of manure to the farmers etc. All the above issued have been addressed

All the molasses based distilleries have been listed at S. no. 5 (g) in

category ?A?, as per the EIA notification 2006 and have to be appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the centre.

M/s. Shri Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and their

consulatant AQA International, Pune gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and envisaged environmental protection measures.

The PP has proposed for molasses based distillery unit of capacity 30

KLPD to manufacture 900 KLPM of Rectified spirit or 855 KLPM of Extra Neutral Alcohol or 855 KLPM of Ethanol in District Pune, Maharashtra. No protected forests / eco-sensitive area are located with in 10 Km. radius of the project site. River Pawana flows at a distance of 5 km from the proposed unit. Total land area available with the unit is 170 acres and for establishment of the proposed distillery unit will require 30 acres of land area. Green belt will be developed in an area of 28 hectares. Cost of the project is Rs. 27.17 crores.

Power requirement will be 85 KW/hr. and will be met through in house

captive power plant. Fuel for the boiler is coal (1.05 T/hr.). Diesel requirement for 320 KVA DG set will be 40 lts/hr. Water requirement for the unit will be 447 m3/d and will be sourced from the Pawana river. The total waste water generation will be 254 MT/day. The spent wash generation will be 240 MT/day. The spent wash after concentration in the evaporator will be incinerated in the boiler to achieve zero discharge. Domestic effluent (4 MT/day) will be treated in septic tank. Gaseous emissions in the proposed unit will be mainly the flue gases from the boiler and diesel generator. Bag filters will be installed to control the particulate emissions from the boiler fired on spent wash and coal. Solid waste would be generated in the form of yeast sludge, ETP sludge which will be used as manure

after mixing with compost. The boiler ash will be sold to the brick manufacturing units.

The Committee noted that method of treatment of spent wash is as per the CPCB guidelines. The Committee after detailed deliberations recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to compliance of following additional specific conditions:

1. The storage of spent wash shall not be more than 5 days. 2. Ground water quality monitoring shall be carried around the plant and

data submitted to the RO, MoEF/CPCB/State Pollution Control Board. 3. Fire Fighting System shall be as per the OISD-117 Norms and cover

all areas where alcohol is produced, handled and stored. 4. Provision of foam system for fire fighting to control fire from the alcohol



10.2.6 Proposed expansion of Dye & Dye Intermediates Unit and setting up 5 MW Power Plant at S.No. 637, Village Kalamsar, Taluka Khambhat , District Anand, Gujarat by M/s. Cambay Chem Limited- Reg. Environmental Clearance

The above proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in

its 85th meeting held during 23rd to 25th September, 2008. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking the EIA/EMP study and advised the project proponent to submit the EIA/EMP report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing. The issues emerged during the PH/PC shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report and the final report should be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

Project activity is listed at Sl no.5 (f) in the Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and is of ?A category, as the project is located outside the industrial area and was appraised at central level. Project authorities further requested the Ministry that due to Global recession it is not viable to manufacture the earlier stated products and would like to add few extra products. In this regard, company again submitted the revised form ?I for reconsideration of the project. The proposal was placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee in its meeting held during 15-16th April, 2009 to prescribe the TORs.

The Committee suggested that the project should prepare EIA/EMP report

based on the TORs issued in the 85th meeting and submit the same to the concerned SPCB for conducting Public Consultation. The EIA/EMP Report should be as per the generic structure given in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006. The concerns emerged during the Public Consultation may be incorporated in the EIA/EMP Report and the final EIA/EMP may be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

Public hearing of the project was held on 2nd January, 2010. The issues raised during the public hearing were regarding use of treated waste water, emissions from the plant, provision of job opportunities etc. All the above issues have been addressed.

M/s. Cambay Chem Limited gave a presentation on the project. M/s Cambay Chem have proposed for expansion of dye & dye intermediates manufacturing unit and setting up 5 MW power plant at s.no. 637, village: Kalamsar , Taluka: Khambhat , Dist: Anand, Gujarat. River Mahi flows at a distance of 6 kms. Proposed expansion will be within the existing unit having land area of 4,39,315 m2. Green belt will be developed in 240884 m2. Cost of the expansion will be Rs. 39.50 Crores. Details of products and their production capacities are given below:

S. No. Product

Existing Quantity (MTPM)

Proposed Quantity (MTPM)

Total Quantity (MTPM)

Dyes

01 Acid dyes

02 Reactive dyes

03 Direct dyes

--

1000

1000

Dyes Intermediates

01 K acid

30 70 100

02 Gamma acid

30 70 100

03 CPC blue

- 500 500

04 Vinyl

sulphone

- 500 500

05 H-acid

- 400 400

06 DASA

- 100 100

07 Pigment Alpha

Blue

- 40 40

08 Pigment Beta

- 40 40

Blue

09 Di Amino Stillbene Di Sulphonic Acid (DASDA)

- 100* 100

10 Meta Chloro Acitic Acid (MCA)

- 50* 50

11 Ortho Toudine 5- Sulphinic acid

50* 50

12 Bas Acid - 50* 50

13 FC Acid PAABSA - 50* 50

14 PAABSA 25* 25

15 Optical Brightening Agent

- 250* 250

Total 60 3295 3355

Power plant (coal based)

-- 5 MW 5 MW

Note: * new products proposed

Power requirement after the proposed expansion will be 5150 HP and will

be met from the Madhya Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd and 5 MW power plant. Fuel requirement will be coal/lignite (7366 MTPM), FO/LDO (125 MTPM) and HSD (8.5 m3/day)

Water requirement after the proposed expansion will be 1498 m3/day and will be met from the ground water source. Total wastewater generation will be 1008 m3/day. Low volume high COD/TDS wastewater (268 m3/day) will be concentrated in multiple effect evaporator followed by incineration and zero discharge will be achieved. High volume, low COD/ TDS industrial wastewater (716 m3/day) stream will be treated in proposed effluent treatment plant and treated effluent will be disposed of in to the Gulf of Cambay by a submerged pipeline. Domestic effluent will be disposed through septic tank/ soak pit.

Cyclone separator and stack height of 30 m is proposed to control particulate emissions from the steam boiler. Stack height of 10 m is proposed for the DG set. ESP is proposed for the power plant to control the particulate emissions. Emissions from the incinerator will be controlled by two stage alkali venturi scrubber. Bag filter/scrubber is proposed for the spray dryer. Cyclone separator /bag filter is proposed for the spin flash drier. Process emissions will be

in the form of SO2, HCl, NOx, NH3. SO2 and HCl emissions from K-acid and Gamma acid plants will be controlled by two stage alkali scrubber with one ventury and one scrubber column. SO2 emissions from the H-acid plant will be controlled by two stage alkali venturi scrubber followed by packed column alkali scrubber. NOx emissions from the H-acid plant will be controlled by two stage packed column and ventury alkali scrubber. HCl from Vinyl Sulphone and DASA plant will be controlled by two stage alkali scrubber in water followed by alkali scrubber. NH3 from the CPC blue plant will be controlled by two stage venturi scrubber in water. HCl Emissions from the Turquoise Blue plant will be controlled by two stage venturi scrubber in water followed by alkali scrubber.

Solid waste generation will be in the form of used oil (0.4 MT/month) which will be collected and reused or sold to registered refiners. Gypsum Sludge (4285 MT/month) and Iron sludge (1909 MT/month) will be sold to cement/fly ash brick manufacturers. Glaubers salt (1100 MT/month) will be reused in the H-acid and dyes and dye intermediates manufacturing process or sold to other dye manufacturers. Other process waste including scrubber residue (283.5 MT/month) will be sent to secured landfill site. R-salt (29.4 MT/month) will be reused or sold to other dye manufacturers. Ammonium carbonates (10-15%) (1000 MT/month), spent sulphanilic acid (17 MT/month) and spent Hydrochloric acid (25%) (300 MT/month) will be sold to other units. Spent acetic acid (64 MT/month) and spent sulphuric acid (20-23%) (2300 MT/month) will be used in H-acid manufacturing unit. ETP sludge (4.2 MT/month) will be sent to secured landfill site. Discarded carboys/drums/cylinder (28 MT/Month) will be sold to authorized recyclers. Discarded bags and liners (21300 nos./month) will be reused and sold to authorized recyclers. Resin from DM plant (0.072 MT/month) will be given back to the suppliers. Incineration ash (200 MT/month) will be sent to secured landfill site. The Committee noted that the issues raised during the public hearing to be addressed point wise and risk assessment for handling and transportation of hazardous chemicals needs to be carried. Further data regarding CO & HC to be rechecked.

The Committee decided to defer the project and sought following additional information for reconsideration of the project:

1. Action taken report on the point wise issues raised during the public hearing.

2. Detailed process description along with flow diagram 3. Details of effluent treatment and characteristics of treated effluent 4. Quality of the ground water and submission of monitored data 5. Data regarding CO & HC needs to be rechecked 6. Risk assessment for handling and transportation of hazardous

chemicals

10.2.7 Setting up of Agro Waste Panel Board manufacturing plant (4,32,000 pieces of Agro Waste Panel Board and Resin for captive use) at Survey no. 270, Navalgarh, Dhangadhra, District Surendranagar, Gujarat by M/s Rushil Décor Limited ?reg. Environmental Clearance

The project authorities and their consultant Envisafe, Ahmedabad gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken. The plant will manufacture resin for captive use which is a synthetic organic chemical. The synthetic organic chemical manufacturing units located out side the notified industrial areas are listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 under ?A? category and will be apprised at central level.

The proposal was earlier considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 92nd meeting held during 18-20th March, 2009. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking EIA/EMP study and advised the project proponent to submit the EIA/EMP report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing. The issues emerged during the PH/PC shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report and the final report should be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

Public hearing of the project was held on 2nd February, 2010. The issues raised during the public hearing were regarding acquisition of land, control of dust and fugitive emission, water requirement and waste water management, socio economic activities etc. All the above issues have been addressed.

M/s Rushil Décor Limited have proposed for setting up of Agro Waste

Panel Board manufacturing plant (4,32,000 pieces / month of Agro Waste Panel Board and Resin @ of 1400 TPM for captive use) at Survey no. 270, Navalgarh, Dhangadhra, District Surendranagar, Gujarat. The company has acquired 31.7 acres of land of which 32,000 m2 area has been earmarked for green belt. No eco-sensitive areas are located within 15 km periphery of the plant. The total cost of the project will be Rs. 13.49 Crores.

There will not be any process emissions. Scrubber will be installed for control of formaldehyde fumes generated during its handling. Fresh water requirement of 49.7 KLD will be met from Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited. The unit has already obtained permission from the Public Health and Sanitation Department, Surendranagar for supply of water from the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited. The total power requirement for the proposed plant will be 2 MW which will be sourced from Paschim Gujarat Vij. co. Ltd. One DG set of 250 KVA will be installed to meet the power requirement during emergency. The unit will install thermic fluid heater of capacity 30 lakh kcal /hour

where lignite, plant dust, agricultural waste generated from the manufacturing processes will be used as fuel. The fuel for the DG set will be HSD.

About 0.7 m3/d of wastewater will be generated from the cooling, washing of resin plant and process. No process wastewater will be required for the manufacturing of synthetic resin. However, there will be generation of wastewater during distillation of resin, which will be treated in the effluent treatment plant. The treated waste water after primary, secondary and tertiary treatment will be used for land irrigation after meeting the prescribed standards. About 4 m3/d of domestic effluent will be generated which will be disposed of in

soak pit through septic tank.

To control the particulate emissions from the thermic fluid heater, multi-cyclone separator will be installed and flue gas emissions will be dispersed through stack of adequate height. The particulate emissions from the process will be controlled by multi cyclone separator followed by common bag filters attached to the sanding machine and material handling system. Cyclone separator will be installed to dryer to control the particulate emissions.

The hazardous/solid waste generation will be in the form of used/waste oil

(5 Lits/annum) which will be reused within the plant premises as lubricants are sold to the approved recyclers. The ETP sludge (2T/annum) will be sent to the TSDF site for disposal.

The Committee after detailed deliberation recommended the project for

environmental clearance subject to stipulation of specific environmental safeguards.

10.2.8 Development drilling of additional 93 wells in Mehsana Assets at Mehsana Central Tank Farm in Gujarat by M/s. ONGC Limited. Reg. TOR The project authorities gave a presentation on the salient features of the

project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP Report. The activity relating to exploratory drilling and development for Oil and Gas is listed at serial no. 1(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006

The proposal regarding development drilling of 157 no. of wells in Mehsana Assets in Gujarat by M/s ONGC was accorded environmental clearance on 1.4.2009. M/s ONGC Limited have proposed for development drilling of additional 93 no. of production wells in Mehsana asset of which 83 wells will be vertical directional wells and 10 high tech wells. The depth of the wells will be about 800 -2000 m. The wells will be drilled during the year 2010-

2011 and 2011-2012. The area of the block is 634.73 km2. Water Based Drilling Mud will be used for drilling of wells. The land required for each drill site will be 110m x 110m. Cost for the drilling of vertical/directional wells and high tech wells will be Rs. 207.5 crores and Rs.72 crores respectively.

Water requirement of 25 m3/day/well will be sourced from the tankers/tube wells. The wastewater generation will be 10-15 m3/day/well. The wastewater generated will be collected in the waste water storage pits and will be recycled and reused. About 15m3/d of drilling waste /well will be generated. The residual waste water and the drilling fluid from the drilling operations will be collected in waste pits for solar drying. The pit will be lined with HDPE sheets. Domestic effluent will be disposed through septic tanks and soak pits. DG sets will be installed to meet the power requirement. 1.5-2.0 kl/day of HSD will be consumed for Diesel engines.

The air emission sources will be from the DG set at well site, engine

driving rig and emissions during test and production flaring of wells. Air emissions will be controlled by providing adequate stack height. Produced gas will be flared through a vertical flare, installed at a distance of 90m from the well site.

Solid waste generation will be in the form of drill cuttings (70-100 m3/well)

which will be disposed off in an impervious lined pit. Domestic organic waste will be disposed on site through a waste pit. Waste oil will be collected and stored in a paved dedicated waste oil storage area and will be sent to authorized recyclers. Spent lead acid batteries will be sent for recycling to authorized waste contractors.

The Expert Appraisal Committee (I) prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA Study:

1. Executive summary of the project. 2. Compliance to the conditions stipulated in environmental clearance

accorded for the existing project. 3. Project Description and Project Benefits 4. Site details including satellite imagery for 10 km area. Conformation

that there is no National Park/ Wild life Sanctuary/ Eco sensitive area.

5. Land use along with maps & cropping pattern, vegetation ecology, flora & fauna

6. Demography & Socio-economics of the area. 7. Process details for survey and drilling. 8. Forest Clearance in case the forest land is involved. 9. Baseline data collection for air, water and soil for one season

leaving the monsoon season in an area of 10 Km radius with centre of Oil Field as its centre covering the area of all proposed drilling wells.

� Ambient Air Quality monitoring at 8 locations for PM10, SO2, NOx

� Background levels of hydrocarbons HC (Methane and Non-methane) and VOCs (5 samples)

� Soil sample analysis at 10 locations

� Base line underground and surface water quality in the vicinity of 10 km area.

� Climatology & Meteorology including wind speed, wind direction, temperature, rainfall etc.

� Measurement of Noise levels at 10 locations in the block

10. Detailed water balance, wastewater generation and discharge. 11. Treatment and utilization of produced water. 12. Detailed solid waste generation, collection, segregations, its

recycling and reuse, treatment and disposal 13. Estimation and computation of air emissions resulting out of

drilling operations 14. Assessment of impact on air, water, soil, solid/hazardous waste

and noise levels 15. Evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control

measures to meet the air quality emission standards, water discharge norms, solid/hazardous waste generation and disposal

16. Estimation of Noise level due to operation of drilling , its associated equipments and vehicular movement & prediction and evaluation of impacts due to increase in noise levels arising out of the proposed activities on the surrounding environment. Proposed mitigation measures for noise pollution

17. Storage of chemicals at the site, proposed preventive measures for spillage and accident.

18. Environmental Management Plan 19. Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan

• Identification of hazards

• Consequence Analysis

Risk• Presentation & proposed measures for Risk Reduction

• Disaster Management Plan (DMP)

Oil• Spill Contingency Plan and Emergency Response Plan 20. Measures for decommissioning of the rigs and projects 21. Post project closure and monitoring programme 22. Documentary proofs for Memberships of common disposal

facilities, if any

23. Details of proposed occupational Health Surveillance program for the employees and other labour.

24. Environmental Monitoring program while survey and drilling is undertaken.

25. Any issues related to land subsidence. 26. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction

/order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.

The following general points should be noted:

(i) All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered. (ii) Period/date of data collection should be clearly indicated. (iii) Authenticated English translation of all material provided in Regional

languages. (iv) The letter/application for EC should quote the MOEF file No. and also

attach a copy of the letter. (v) A copy of the letter received from the Ministry should be also attached as

an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report. (vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the

issues in this letter. The index of the final EIA-EMP report, must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues have been incorporated.

(vii) While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the proponents and instructions for the consultants issued by MoEF vide O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II (I) dated 4th August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry should also be followed.

(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F. No.J -l1013/77/2004 -IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred. The Committee decided that the proponent should prepare EIA/EMP

Report based on the above TORs and submit the same to the Ministry for obtaining Environmental Clearance. Public Hearing was exempted as per Para 7 (II) of EIA Notification 2006 as Public Hearing for exploratory drilling of block CB-ONN-2004/1 in District Mehsana was held on 12.08.2008 and for PEL blocks was held on 16.09.2008. 10.2.9 Proposed exploratory drilling of up to 10 wells in Area of 2, 649 sq.

km in DS-ONN-2004/1 Block at District Dhule & Jalgaon,

Maharashtra by M/s GeoGlobal Resources (Barbados) Inc.? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant Kadam Environmental

Consultants, Vadodara gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The activity relating to exploratory drilling and development for Oil and Gas is listed at serial no. 1(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 M/s Geoglobal Resources (Barbados) Inc. (GGR) have proposed for exploratory drilling of 10 wells upto 500-2000 m depth in area of 2,649 sq. Km of DS-ONN-2004 block in Dhule and Jalgaon Districts of Maharashtra. Petroleum Exploration License (PEL) to start the exploration activities in the block was given to GGR on 07.06.2007. The block boundary falls in the interstate boundary between Maharashtra & Madhya Pradesh and Anerdam wildlife sanctuary lies within the block boundary. Major rivers pass through block (distances from nearest well: Tapi-3.28 km; Buray river-2.4 km; Panjhra river-2.15 km). Protected and reserved forest lies within the block boundary. However, as on date, there is no plan to drill any well in the forest area. Forest clearance would be obtained if forest area needs to be drilled. Notified/protected Archaeological sites, broad guage railway line, national/state highways, etc. are present within the study area.

The power required to run the drilling rig, circulation system, lighting etc. will be met from diesel engines & DG set of capacities 1000 HP, 40 HP & 40-60 KVA. 220 litres (approx.) of HSD per hour would be the total fuel requirement for these diesel engines & DG set. About 20 m3/d of water will be required for drilling operation of each well. 10 KLD of wastewater will be generated during drilling operations from single well and will be discharged in a HDPE lined evaporation pit at site. The wastewater would contain variable quantities of mineral salts, solids, suspended & dissolved hydrocarbons and other organic & inorganic components. The sewage generated from sanitation facilities shall be disposed through septic tanks.

The total quantity of drill cuttings and spent drilling mud is estimated to be

34 MT. If found hazardous after testing, will be disposed in-situ or sent to a nearby TSDF. Sludge containing oil (0.15 MT/well) will be sent for recycling to authorized recyclers or to TSDF for incineration. HWM&H rules will be followed for wastes disposal.

There is no production process during drilling operations. CO2, water and

traces of SOX, NOX & PM are contained in the emissions from drilling operations. A flare stack of 9 m height will be provided in accordance with the Oil Mines Regulation Rules, 1984 at drilling site during testing operation. The source of noise generation would be the operation of rig and diesel-generating sets. The

expected noise generation at source, due to operation of rig is 101 dBA. Diesel engines will be provided with acoustic enclosures at the rig and the exhausts of engines will be provided with silences to reduce the noise levels. Personal protective equipment like ear muffs will be provided for working personnel.

The Committee approved the TORs presented by the project proponent

and prescribed the following TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP:

1. Executive summary of the project. 2. Project Description and Project Benefits 3. Site details including satellite imagery for 10 km area. A map duly

authenticated by the CWLW showing the location of wildlife sanctuary and the location of the block along with recommendations or comments of the CWLW.











recycling and reuse, treatment and disposal 12. Estimation and computation of air emissions resulting out of drilling

operations

13. Assessment of impact on air, water, soil, solid/hazardous waste and noise levels

14. Evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control measures to meet the air quality emission standards, water discharge norms, solid/hazardous waste generation and disposal








Oil• Spill Contingency Plan and Emergency Response Plan

19. Measures for decommissioning of the rigs and projects 20. Post project closure and monitoring programme 21. Documentary proofs for Memberships of common disposal

facilities, if any. 22. Details of proposed occupational Health Surveillance program

for the employees and other labour. 23. Environmental Monitoring program while survey and drilling is

undertaken. 24. Any issues related to land subsidence. 25. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction

/order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.



languages. (iv) The letter/application for EC should quote the MOEF file No. and

also attach a copy of the letter. (v) A copy of the letter received from the Ministry should be also

attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report.

(vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the issues in this letter. The index of the final EIA-EMP report, must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues have been incorporated.


(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F. No.J -l1013/77/2004 -IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The Committee decided that these ?TORs? should be considered for the

preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. As soon as the EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same shall be submitted to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting District wise public hearing. The issues raised during the public hearing and point wise response shall be incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report incorporating the issues raised during the public hearing shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.2.10 Proposed Exploratory Drilling in Block DS-ONN-2003/1 (3155 km2) at

District Nandurbar and Dhule, Maharashtra by M/s GeoGlobal Resources (Barbados) Inc. ? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant Kadam Environmental

Consultants, Vadodara gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The activity relating to exploratory drilling and development for Oil and Gas is listed at serial no. 1(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 M/s Geoglobal Resources (Barbados) Inc. (GGR) has proposed Exploratory Drilling of 10 wells upto 500-2500 m depth in an area of 3,155 sq. Km of DS-ONN-2003 block at Nandurbar and Dhule Districts of Maharashtra. Petroleum Exploration License (PEL) to start the exploration activities in the block was given to GGR on 04.09.2006. Protected and Reserved Forest areas lie within the block boundary. However, as on date, there is no plan to drill any well in the forest area. Forest clearance would be obtained if forest area needs to be

drilled Notified/protected Archaeological sites, broad guage railway line, national/state highways, rivers are present within the study area. No route/facility used by public lies within 0.5 km from well sites Nandurbar town is within block. The project does not attract any general and specific conditions. There is no manufacturing process involved in the drilling operations. Oil & Gas will be discovered if wells are successful.

The power required to run the drilling rig, circulation system, lighting etc. will be met from diesel engines & DG set of capacities 1000 HP, 40 HP & 40-60 KVA. 220 litres (approx.) of HSD per hour would be the total fuel requirement for these diesel engines & DG set. About 20 m3/d of water will be required for drilling operation of each well. 10 KLD of wastewater will be generated during drilling operations from single well and will be discharged in a HDPE lined evaporation pit at site. The wastewater would contain variable quantities of mineral salts, solids, suspended & dissolved hydrocarbons and other organic & inorganic components. The sewage generated from sanitation facilities shall be disposed through septic tanks.

The municipal solid waste will be disposed off to the nearest

municipality/community bin on a daily basis. The total quantity of drill cuttings and spent drilling mud is estimated to be 34 MT. If found hazardous after testing, will be disposed in-situ or sent to a nearby TSDF. Sludge containing oil (0.15 MT/well) will be sent for recycling to authorized recyclers or to TSDF for incineration. HWM&H rules will be followed for wastes disposal.

There is no production process during drilling operations. CO2, water and

traces of SOX, NOX & PM are contained in the emissions from drilling operations. A flare stack of 9m height will be provided in accordance with the Oil Mines Regulation Rules, 1984 at drilling site during testing operation. The source of noise generation would be the operation of rig and diesel-generating sets. The expected noise generation at source, due to operation of rig is 101 dBA. Diesel engines will be located in acoustic enclosures at the rig and the exhausts of engines will be provided with silences to reduce the noise levels. Personal protective equipment like ear muffs will be provided for working personnel.

The Committee approved the TORs presented by the project proponent

and prescribed the following TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP:

1. Executive summary of the project. 2. Project Description and Project Benefits 3. Site details including satellite imagery for 10 km area. A map duly

authenticated by the CWLW showing the location of wildlife sanctuary and the location of the block along with recommendations or comments of the CWLW.











recycling and reuse, treatment and disposal 12. Estimation and computation of air emissions resulting out of drilling

operations 13. Assessment of impact on air, water, soil, solid/hazardous waste

and noise levels 14. Evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control

measures to meet the air quality emission standards, water discharge norms, solid/hazardous waste generation and disposal








Oil• Spill Contingency Plan and Emergency Response Plan

19. Measures for decommissioning of the rigs and projects 20. Post project closure and monitoring programme 21. Documentary proofs for Memberships of common disposal

facilities, if any. 22. Details of proposed occupational Health Surveillance

program for the employees and other labour. 23. Environmental Monitoring program while survey and drilling

is undertaken. 24. Any issues related to land subsidence. 25. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any

direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.



languages. (iv) The letter/application for EC should quote the MOEF file No. and

also attach a copy of the letter. (v) A copy of the letter received from the Ministry should be also

attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report. (vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate

the issues in this letter. The index of the final EIA-EMP report, must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues have been incorporated.


(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F. No.J -l1013/77/2004 -IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The Committee decided that these ?TORs? should be considered for the

preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. As soon as the EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same shall be submitted to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting District wise public hearing. The issues raised during the public hearing and pointwise response shall be incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report incorporating the issues raised during the public hearing shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.2.11 Proposed 120 KLPD Grain Distillery and 8 MW power generation at Village-Jatwar, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala, Haryana by M/s A.B. Grain Spirits Pvt. Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and M/s EST Consultants (P) Ltd., Delhi gave a

detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The grain based distillery units are list at sl.no. 5(g) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and 30KLPD and above require appraisal by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre.

M/s A.B. Grain Spirits Pvt. Limited have proposed for 120 KLPD grain

based distillery unit in District Ambala in Haryana. The company has acquired land area of 17.5 acres of which 5 acres has been earmarked for green belt development. No National Park/Wildlife Sanctuary/Eco sensitive area is located within 15 km radius of the project. The unit will operate for 330 days. Cost of the project is Rs. 11.088 crores.

Water requirement of 4470 m3/d will be met from the ground water source. Fresh water requirement after recycling of products condensate etc. will be 1783 m3/d. About 1105 m3/d of spent wash will be generated which will be fed to the Centrifugal decanter for separation of suspended solids as wet cake. The thin slops from the decanter will be partially recycled to process and partially taken for evaporation in the multiple effect evaporator and concentration. The concentrated syrup will be mixed with the wet cake to be sold as cattle feed. The power requirement will be 2630 KW, which will be met from the 65 TPH boiler and 8 MW turbine. 2 DG sets of 1250 KVA capacity will be installed to meet the emergency power requirement. About 360 TPD of wet cake and thick syrup will be sold as cattle feed. Ash from the boiler 61.6 TPD from rice husk or 100TPD from coal fired boiler will be disposed of as per MoEF guidelines.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study:

1. Executive summary of the project. 2. Detailed break up of the project cost. 3. Detailed break up of the land area along with photograph of the area. 4. Present land use based on satellite imagery. 5. Details of site and information related to environmental setting within

10 km radius of the project site. 6. Information regarding eco-sensitive area such as national park / wildlife

sanctuary / biosphere reserves within 10 km radius of project area. 7. List of existing distillery units in the area along with their capacity. 8. Details of raw material and source of raw material including grains and

market for the cattle feed. 9. Sources of fuel and quantity for the boiler 10. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx as per

GSR 826(E) dated 17th November, 2009 for three months except monsoon.

11. Mathematical modeling for calculating the dispersion of air pollutants and ground level concentration along with emissions from the boiler.

12. Details of the use of steam from the boiler and use of fuel. 13. Ground water quality around spent wash storage lagoon and the

project area. 14. Noise levels monitoring at five locations within the study area. 15. List of flora and fauna in the study area. 16. Number of working days of the distillery unit. 17. Details of the spent wash treatment. 18. Proposed effluent treatment system and scheme for achieving zero

discharge. 19. Detailed water requirement and water balance and measures for

conservation water by recycling and reuse to minimize the fresh water requirement.

20. Water drawl permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground Water Board as may be applicable to this case.

21. Hydro-geological study of the area for availability of ground water. 22. Details of solid waste management including management of boiler

ash. 23. Green belt development as per the CPCB guidelines. 24. Environment Management Plan. 25. Risk assessment for storage and handling of alcohol and mitigation

measure due to fire and explosion and handling areas. 26. Fire fighting system as per OISD-117 norms. 27. Provision of Foam System for fire fighting to control fire from the

alcohol storage tank. 28. Rainwater harvesting measures. 29. Details of occupational health surveillance programme.

30. Details of socio economic welfare activities. 31. Post project environmental monitoring. 32. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order

passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof. 33. Action plan in the tabular form to the issues/suggestions made during

the public hearing along with the implementation plan and allocation of funds.

34. A tabular chart indicating point-wise compliance of the TORs.


(i) All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered.

(ii) Period/date of data collection should be clearly indicated.

(iii) Authenticated English translation of all material provided in Regional languages.

(iv) The letter/application for EC should quote the MOEF file No. and also attach a copy of the letter.

(v) The copy of the letter received from the Ministry should be also attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report.

(vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the issues in this letter and that raised in Public Hearing/consultation along with duly filled in Industry Sector questionnaire. The index of the final EIA-EMP report must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues and the issues raised in the Public hearing have been incorporated.


(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The Committee decided that the proponent should prepare EIA/EMP Report based on the above TORs and submit the same to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing/consultation. The EIA/EMP Report should be as per the generic structure given in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006. The concerns emerged during the Public Consultation should be incorporated in the EIA/EMP Report and the final EIA/EMP submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance

10.2.12 Proposed 120 KLPD Grain Distillery at Village-Jatwar, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala, Haryana by M/s Adie Broswon Distillery & Bottlers Pvt. Limited? Reg. TORs


detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The grain based distillery units are list at sl.no. 5(g) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and 30KLPD and above require appraisal by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre.

M/s Adie Broswon Distillery & Bottlers Pvt. Limited have proposed for 120 KLPD grain based distillery unit in District Ambala in Haryana. The project authorities and their consultants M/s EST Consultants (P) Ltd gave presentation on the salient features of the project. The company has acquired an land area of 17.5 acres of which 5 acres has been earmarked for green belt development. No National Park/Wildlife Sanctuary/Eco sensitive area is located within 15 km radius of the project. The unit will operate for 330 days. Cost of the project is Rs. 11.088 Crores.

Water requirement of 4470 m3/d will be met from the ground water source. Fresh water requirement after recycling of products condensate etc. will be 1783 m3/d. About 1105 m3/d of spent wash will be generated which will be fed to the Centrifugal decanter for separation of suspended solids as wet cake. The thin slops from the decanter will be partially recycled to process and partially taken for evaporation in the multiple effect evaporator and concentration. The concentrated syrup will be mixed with the wet cake to be sold as cattle feed. The power requirement will be 2630 KW, which will be met from the 65 TPH boiler and 8 MW turbine. 2 DG sets of 1250 KVA capacity will be installed to meet the emergency power requirement. About 360 TPD of wet cake and thick syrup will be sold as cattle feed. Ash from the boiler 61.6 TPD from rice husk or 100TPD from coal fired boiler will be disposed of as per MoEF guidelines.




sanctuary / biosphere reserves within 10 km radius of project area. 7. List of existing distillery units in the area along with their capacity. 8. Details of raw material and source of raw material including grains. 9. Sources of fuel and quantity for the boiler 10. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx as per







20. Water drawl permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground Water Board.



measure due to fire and explosion and handling areas. 26. Fire fighting system as per TAC norms. 27. Provision of Foam System for fire fighting to control fire from the

alcohol storage tank. 28. Rainwater harvesting measures. 29. Details of occupational health surveillance programme. 30. Details of socio economic welfare activities. 31. Post project environmental monitoring.

32. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.

33. Action plan in the tabular form to the issues/suggestions made during the public hearing along with the implementation plan and allocation of funds.










(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The Committee decided that the proponent should prepare EIA/EMP Report based on the above TORs and submit the same to the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing/consultation. The EIA/EMP

Report should be as per the generic structure given in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006. The concerns emerged during the Public Consultation should be incorporated in the EIA/EMP Report and the final EIA/EMP submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance

10.2.13 Proposed integrated complex for 30 KLPD Molasses based Distillery, 30 KLPD Grain/Cane Syrup based Distillery, 4500 TCD Sugar Mill and 23 MW Cogeneration Power Plant at Village Kiri Afgana, Tehsil- Batala, District Gurdaspur in Punjab by M/s Chadha Sugars & Industries Limited ? reg. TORs


detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The Molasses / Grain based distillery units are listed at Sl.no. 5(g) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. Molasses based units irrespective of capacity and non molasses based distilleries of 30 KLPD and above require appraisal by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre.

M/s Chadha Sugars & Industries Ltd. have proposed for setting up Integrated Complex comprising 30 KLPD Molasses based Distillery, 30 KLPD Grain/Sugarcane Juice Syrup based Distillery, 4500 TCD Sugar Mill and 23 MW Cogeneration Power Plant at Village Kiri Afgana, Tehsil Batala, Dist. Gurdaspur, Punjab. The total proposed area of the unit is 37 acres. The cost of project is Rs. 60 crores. There are no environmentally sensitive areas within 15 km of proposed project location boundary.

The power requirement for distillery is 1940 KW, for sugar mill is 2000 KW and for power plant is 1500 KW, which will be met from the proposed 23 MW Cogen power plant. Sugar cane bagasse will be used as the primary fuel, supplemented by steam, coal, rice husk and the biogas from distillery ETP. DG sets (1each of 1000 KVA & 500 KVA) will be run on HSD. Particulate emissions from the 130 TPH boiler will be controlled by installation of ESP/wet scrubber.

The water requirement of 1302 KLD (659 KLD for grain based process & 643 KLD for molasses based process), for sugar mill is 1600 KLD and for power plant is 1560 KLD, which will be met from the ground water source.

The spent wash generation from the based process will be 398 KLD and

294 KLD for grain based process. The spent wash in the case of molasses based process shall be sent to biodigester for recovery of biogas followed by degasification, evaporation and biocomposting. The thick slops from grain unit shall be subjected to decantation for removal of wet cake. A part of thin slops shall be recycled back to process followed by evaporation, biomethanation and

biocomposting to achieve zero discharge. The effluent from sugar unit will be subjected to equalization followed by anaerobic digestion and aerobic oxidation and the treated effluent will be used for green belt. The sewage will be led to septic tanks, run off to soak pits and used for horticulture/green belt.

Solid waste in the form of ash from boilers shall be used for land filling at designated places. Wet cake from grain distillery shall be sold as cattle feed. The waste bagasse, fly ash & filter cake/press mud from sugar mill will be used for combustion in boiler or for biocomposting. The used oil & grease from boiler/internal parts will be disposed off as per HWM&H rules. The scrap generated from stores/workshop will be given to authorized recyclers.

The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in association with Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), New Delhi have carried out an environmental assessment of Industrial clusters across the country based on Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index (CEPI) with the aim of identifying polluted industrial clusters and prioritizing planning needs for intervention to improve the quality of environment in these industrial clusters and the nation as a whole. The assessment so carried out has been documented in the form of a report entitled ?Comprehensive Environmental Assessment of Industrial Clusters? which is available on the website of CPCB www.cpcb.nic.in and website of Ministry www.envfor.nic.in. In all 88 industrial clusters have been assessed.

The Ministry has also issued an circular no. J-11013/5/2010-IA-II (I) dated

13th January, 2010 regarding consideration of project for environmental clearance based on CEPI with immediate effect. As per the report, the industrial clusters/ areas having aggregated CEPI scores of 70 and above should be considered as critically polluted; the clusters/ areas having CEPI scores between 60-70 should be considered as severally polluted areas and shall be kept under surveillance and pollution control measures should be efficiently implemented; and the critically polluted industrial clusters / areas need further detailed investigations in terms of the extent of damage and formulation of appropriate remedial action plan

It was noted that the Batala is designated as severely polluted area. The Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB) was requested to depute the concerned officer to appraise the Committee with respect to pollution load in term of Ambient Air Quality/ Water Quality or solid/ hazardous waste management as per the circular no. J-11013/18/2009-IA-II (I) dated 25th August, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website www.envfor.nic.in .

Dr. Sandeep Behl, Executive Environment Engineer from PPCB attended the meeting to apprise the Committee about the pollution level in the project area. he informed the Committee about 180 foundries based on cupola furnace were in operation in Batala town. That is why pollution levels were high in Batala. The proposed unit is located at a distance of 30 km from the Batala town. No

major industry except one grain based distillery unit is located within a distance of 10 km from the proposed unit.

Further, PPCB has carried out AAQM from April & December, 2009. The

24 hour averages for PM10 at the project site recorded was 99 ug/m3 and at the boundary of Batala was 114 ug/m3. Keeping in view the pollution level at the site, the instant proposal can be considered for prescribing TORs.




sanctuary / biosphere reserves within 10 km radius of project area. 7. List of existing distillery units in the area along with their capacity. 8. Details of raw material and source of raw material including grains. 9. Sources of fuel and quantity for the boiler 10. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx as per







20. Water drawl permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground Water Board.


ash along with action plan. 23. Green belt development as per the CPCB guidelines. 24. Environment Management Plan.

25. Risk assessment for storage and handling of alcohol and mitigation measure due to fire and explosion and handling areas.

26. Fire fighting system as per OISD-117 norms. 27. Provision of Foam System for fire fighting to control fire from the

alcohol storage tank. 28. Rainwater harvesting measures. 29. Details of occupational health surveillance programme. 30. Details of socio economic welfare activities. 31. Post project environmental monitoring. 32. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order





(i) All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered







(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a

certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The Committee decided that the proponent should prepare EIA/EMP Report based on the above TORs and submit the same to the Punjab State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing/consultation. The EIA/EMP Report should be as per the generic structure given in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006. The concerns emerged during the Public Consultation should be incorporated in the EIA/EMP Report and the final EIA/EMP submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance

10.2.14 Proposed expansion of existing molasses/grain based distillery unit from 90 KLPD to 150 KLPD Rectified Spirit/ENA/ Absolute Alcohol at Village-Ahmadpura, Tehsil Atrauli, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh by M/s UBIO Chemical Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation

on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The Molasses / Grain based distillery units are list at Sl.no. 5(g) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. Molasses based units irrespective of Capacity and non molasses based distilleries of 30KLPD and above require appraisal by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre.

M/s UBIO Chemical Limited have proposed for expansion of existing

distillery Unit from 90 KLPD to 150 KLPD at Village-Ahmadpura, Tehsil Atrauli, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. The expansion will be carried within existing land area. The existing 90 KLPD unit is based on molasses. The additional 60 KLPD capacity will be based on molasses as well as grains. No National Park/Wildlife Sanctuary is located within 15km radius of the project. Distillery will operate for 300 days per annum.

The Comprehensive Environment Pollution Index for Aligarh is 63.83

which falls under severely polluted area. However, the unit is located at Atrauli which is at a distance of 17 km from Aligarh Town.

Water requirement of 1800 m3/day will be met from the ground water source. Fresh water requirement of 720 m3/day for the molasses based process and 360 m3/d for the grain based process will be met from the ground water source. Power requirement of 2.0 MW will be met from the captive generation. Two boilers of 25 TPH each based on bagasse /rice husk and spent wash will be installed. The waste water generation would be 1500 m3/day when operated on

molasses and 1260 m3/day when operated on molasses as well as grain. The spent wash from the grain based process will be pumped into the decantation section for removal of solids. The thin slopes will be partly recycled and partly sent for evaporation. The thick syrup from the evaporator will be mixed with the wet cake and sold as DWGS. The spent wash from the molasses based process will be evaporated in the multiple effect evaporator and concentrated spent wash will be incinerated into the boiler to achieve zero discharge. Particulate emissions from the existing 25 TPH & proposed 25 TPH boilers will be controlled by wet scrubber. Solid waste will be generated in the form of boiler ash and fly ash 4.0-4.5 TPD and will be used in filling of low land areas and in manufacturing of bricks.


1. Executive summary of the project. 2. Compliance to the conditions stipulated in the environmental clearance

for the existing project. 3. Detailed break up of the project cost. 4. Detailed break up of the land area along with photograph of the area. 5. Present land use based on satellite imagery. 6. Details of site and information related to environmental setting within 10

km radius of the project site. 7. Information regarding eco-sensitive area such as national park / wildlife

sanctuary / biosphere reserves within 10 km radius of project area. 8. List of existing distillery units in the area along with their capacity. 9. Details of raw material and source of raw material including molasses. 10. Sources of fuel and quantity for the boiler 11. Details of existing pollution control system w.r.t. air, water and land 12. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for PM10, SO2 and NOx as per GSR

826(E) dated 17th November, 2009 for three months except monsoon with 5km distance of the area.


14. Details of the use of steam from the boiler and use of fuel. 15. Water balance along with justification for water requirement for

molasses/grain based process. 16. Ground water quality around spent wash storage lagoon and compost

plant. 17. Noise levels monitoring at five locations within the study area. 18. List of flora and fauna in the study area. 19. Number of working days of the distillery unit. 20. Details of the spent wash treatment. 21. Proposed effluent treatment system and scheme for achieving zero

discharge for molasses as well as grain based process.. 22. Water drawl permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground

Water Board, as may be applicable to this project.



measure due to fire and explosion and handling areas. 28. Fire fighting system as per OISD-117 norms. 29. Provision of Foam System for fire fighting to control fire from the

alcohol storage tank. 30. Rainwater harvesting measures. 31. Details of occupational health surveillance programme. 32. Details of socio economic welfare activities. 33. Post project environmental monitoring. 34. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order











(vii) While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the proponents and instructions for the consultants issued by MoEF vide O.M. No. J-

11013/41/2006-IA.II (I) dated 4th August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry should also be followed.

(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The PP requested the Committee to exempt the project from public hearing as environmental clearance for the existing unit was granted on 20.07.2007 after conducting the public hearing as per the procedure laid in the EIA Notification 2006. The Committee noted that the expansion is being carried in the existing distillery premises and no additional land is required. Further, there will be zero discharge of effluent. Therefore, public hearing was exempted as per Para 7(II) of EIA Notification 2006.

The Committee decided that with the above method of treatment of spent wash, proponent should prepare EIA/EMP Report based on the above TORs and submit the same to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. The EIA/EMP Report should be as per the generic structure given in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006.

The Committee was informed that the existing plan based on

concentration of spent wash and incineration is operating successfully. The committee desired to visit the plant to have assessment of zero discharge of spent wash based on incineration technology.

10.2.15 Proposed Establishment of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) manufacturing industry at Village-Bisuvanahalli, District Bangalore Rural, Karnataka by M/s Ray Chemicals Pvt. Limited? Reg. TORs


on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The activity regarding manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals is

listed at 5(f) of EIA Notification, 2006. Depending on their location in the industrial estate or outside the industrial estate, the projects are categorized as ?A? or ?B? category. Since the instant project is located outside the industrial area, this is a

?A? category project and to be appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre.

M/s Ray Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. have proposed to set up an active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) manufacturing industry in Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka. The total land area of the proposed unit is 20,477.83 sq.m out of which 13,863.5 sq.m (67.7%) will be for green belt. Ardeshahalli Kere, Marasandra Lake and Doddatumkur Kere are at a distance of 1.5 km, 2.5 km and 3 km respectively from proposed project location.

The details of APIs along with their production capacity are given below:

S. No.

Name of the Product Proposed Quantity (MT/Year)

1 Carbamazepine 75.5

2 Meropenem 1.2

3 Sulphadoxine 100

4 Valsartan 6

Total 182.7

The total power requirement of about 150 HP will be met from BESCOM. 250 KVA DG set is proposed to meet the emergency power requirement with fuel requirement of 58.75 litre/hr.

The total water requirement of 14,671 LPD will be met from the ground

water source. Industrial effluent (7,820 LPD) after primary treatment will be sent to CETP for further treatment & disposal. The domestic wastewater will be treated in septic tank and discharged into soak pits

The emissions from process will be scrubbed in a venturi scrubber and

packed column scrubber before dispersion into the atmosphere. Mechanical dust collector would be provided to control particulate emissions from the boiler. Exhaust from DG set and boiler will be emitted from stacks of adequate height for dispersion of gaseous pollutants as per the CPCB/State Pollution Control Board standards.

The high noise generating equipments such as DG set & boiler will be

provided with acoustic enclosures. PPE equipment will be provided for workers. The residual noise level of <65 dBA will be maintained.

The domestic wastes (12.5 kg/day) would be segregated at source, collected in bins and composted. Boiler ash (9.75 kg/day) generated would be provided to authorized agencies for disposal. The hazardous wastes (433.5 kg/month) generated during the manufacture of APIs will be stored at hazardous waste storage area and sent to authorized agencies for disposal.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for preparation of EIA

Report:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details

providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc. 5. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative

humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall is necessary. 6. Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 10

km radius of the project. 7. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment protection

measures. 8. Project location and Plant layout. 9. Product spectrum (Proposed products along with production Capacity) 10. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 11. List of hazardous chemicals with their toxicity levels. 12. Storage and Transportation of raw materials and products. 13. Mass balance of each product along with the batch size, reaction

efficiency etc. 14. Pollution potential from the proposed products 15. List of raw material required and source. 16. Manufacturing process details. 17. Details of solvent recovery plan. 18. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 19. Installation of steam stripper to recover solvent before sending the

effluent into ETP. 20. Measures for solvent recovery and explore the possibility of replacing

benzene with toluene 21. Ambient air quality for PM 2.5, PM 10, SO2, NOx and VOCs at 6

locations within the study area of 10km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

22. One season data for air, water and Noise monitoring. 23. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and

assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features.

24. ?Permission? for drawl of water from the concerned Department. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged.

25. Ground water monitoring minimum at 6 locations should be carried out. 26. The details of waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal

particularly related to the hazardous waste. 27. Design details of incinerator required which should be as per CPCB

design 28. Mode of transportation and handling of raw materials. 29. Risk assessment along with probable accident scenario and risk

mitigative measures. 30. Occupational health scheme for the workers should be incorporated. 31. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 32. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 33. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 34. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP

guidelines for pesticide units. 35. Membership of TSDF 36. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference

to details of air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency, responsibility and time bound implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.

37. EMP should include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.



(i) All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered (ii) Period/date of data collection should be clearly indicated (iii) Authenticated English translation of all material provided in Regional


attach a copy of the letter. (v) The copy of the letter received from the Ministry should be also

attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report (vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the

issues in this letter and that raised in Public Hearing/consultation along with duly filled in Industry Sector questionnaire. The index of the final EIA-EMP report must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues and the issues raised in the Public hearing have been incorporated.


(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F. No. J -l1013/77/2004-IA II(I) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal

Committee (I) should be considered for the preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted to the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KPCB) for conducting public hearing/public consultation as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs and addressing and incorporating all concerns raised during public hearing / public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for obtaining prior environmental clearance.

10.2.16 Proposed Expansion project for manufacturing of Plastic Additives at Govt. Industrial Zone, Dunetha, District Daman (U.T.) by M/s PCL Oil & Solvents Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant M/s Precitech Enviro Limited

gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The activity regarding manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals is

listed at 5(f) of EIA Notification, 2006. Depending on their location in the industrial estate or outside the industrial estate, the projects are categorized ?A? or ?B? category. Since the instant project is located inside the Government industrial area, this is a ?B? category project and to be appraised by the UTEIAA. The project, however, considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre as per the general condition of EIA Notification, 2006 as location of the project is within 10 km distance of the interstate boundary.

M/s PCL Oil & Solvents Ltd. have proposed to increase the production

capacity at Survey No. 56, Govt. Industrial Zone, Dunetha, Bhenslore, Daman (U.T). The total plot area of the unit is 10200 m2, of which 1,000 m2 will be developed under green belt. No additional land will be acquired for the proposed expansion project. The total cost of project is Rs. 13.86 crores. A recurring cost of Rs. 4.3 lacs per month will be utilized for Environmental Protection & Safety measures.

The details of products along with their production capacity are given below:

S. No.

Name of Finished Product

Existing Quantity (MT/Annum)

Total Qty. after Expansion (MT/Annum)

Plastic Additives-Group A

1 Di-Octyl Pthalate (DOP)

2 Di-Iso Nonyl Pthalate (DINP)

3 Di-Iso Decyl Pthalate (DIDP)

60000

Plastic Additives-Group B

4 Di-Butyl Pthalate (DBP) 14000

Plastic Additives-Group C

5 Di-Octyl Maleate (DOM)

6 Di-Butyl Maleate (DBM)

7 Di-Octyl Adipate (DOA)

15000

1000

Power requirement of 600 KVA will be met from the electricity department. Two number of steam boilers and three number of thermic fluid heaters will be based on furnace oil. Two numbers of DG sets will be installed to meet the power requirement during emergency.

The total water requirement is 30.2 KL/Day which will be catered through borewell. The treated effluent would be recycled as cooling tower makeup and cooling tower blow down will be utilized for gardening. There will be zero discharge of effluent.

There will be no process gas emissions due to the proposed expansion. Adequate chimney height will be provided to the utilities to control their emissions.

There will be no major noise generating activities due to proposed

expansion. Acoustic system with D.G set will be provided and regular maintenance of equipments will be carried to mitigate the noise generated from the equipments.

The hazardous/ soild waste generation will be in form of ETP sludge (2.5

MT/ annum) which will be sent to GEPIL site, Silvassa for final disposal waste generation & disposal. The used oil (650ltrs/annum) and empty bags (12 lacs nos/annum) will be sold to authorized recyclers.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for preparation of EIA Report:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Compliance to the conditions stipulated in environmental clearance /

NOC for the existing project 3. Justification of the project. 4. Promoters and their back ground 5. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details

providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc. 6. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative


km radius of the project. 8. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment protection

measures. 9. Project location and Plant layout. 10. Product spectrum (Proposed products along with production Capacity) 11. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 12. List of hazardous chemicals with their toxicity levels. 13. Storage and Transportation of raw materials and products. 14. Mass balance of each product along with the batch size, reaction

efficiency etc. 15. Pollution potential from the proposed products 16. List of raw material required and source. 17. Manufacturing process details. 18. Details of solvent recovery plan. 19. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 20. Installation of steam stripper to recover solvent before sending the

effluent into ETP. 21. Measures for solvent recovery and explore the possibility of replacing

benzene with toluene

22. Ambient air quality for PM 10, SO2, VOCs and NOx at 6 locations within the study area of 5km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

23. One season data for air, water and Noise monitoring. 24. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and


25. ?Permission? for drawl of water from the concerned Department. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged.

26. Ground water monitoring minimum at 6 locations should be carried out. 27. The details of waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal

particularly related to the hazardous waste. 28. Design details of incinerator required which should be as per CPCB

design 29. Mode of transportation and handling of raw materials. 30. Risk assessment along with probable accident scenario and risk

mitigative measures. 31. Occupational health scheme for the workers should be incorporated. 32. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 33. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 34. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 35. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP

guidelines for pesticide units. 36. Membership of TSDF 37. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference





(i) All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered (ii) Period/date of data collection should be clearly indicated (iii) Authenticated English translation of all material provided in Regional



attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report



(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F. No. J -l1013/77/2004-IA II(I) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.


Committee (I) should be considered for the preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. As soon as the EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.2.17 Proposed Expansion of Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Unit at Village Saidpura, Dera Bassi, District Mohali, Punjab by M/s Ashoka Chemical Industries? Reg. TORs

The project authorities did not attend the meeting and there was no

information in this regard. The committee decided that the proposal may be placed before the Committee as and when requested by the proponent.

10.2.18 Proposed Expansion of Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Unit at Village Saidpura, Dera Bassi, District Mohali, Punjab by M/s National Chemical Industries? Reg. TORs

The project authorities did not attend the meeting and there was no

information in this regard. The committee decided that the proposal may be placed before the Committee as and when requested by the proponent.

10.2.19 Expansion of pesticides unit at Village Nathupur, District Sonipat in

Haryana by M/s Jai Shree Rasayan Udyog Ltd. - Reg TORs


on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Pesticides & Pesticide intermediates manufacturing units are listed at serial no. 5(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? category and have to be appraised at central level. M/s Jai Shree Rasayan Udyog Ltd have proposed for expansion of pesticide unit at Village: Nathupur, District Sonipat in Haryana. No national park/wild life sanctuary/reserve forest is located within 10 km radius of the project site. Land area will increase from 4900 m2 to 8550 m2. of which green belt will be developed in 2850 m2 of the land area . Cost of the project is Rs. 2.00 crores.

Details of products along with their production capacity are given below:

Sr. No. Product

Proposed Capacity (MTPA)

1. Weedicides 50

2,4-D Ethyl Ester Technical 100

Glyphossate Technical 100

Butachlor Technical 400

Clodinofob-propergyl/Pyroxifob-Proinyl 20

Imizathypr

Fenoxaprop-p ethyl

Bispyribac Sodium

Total 820

2. Insecticide

Neonicotinamide

Imidacloprid 40

Acetamiprid 20

Thiomethoxam 10

Total 100

3. Synthetic Pyrethroids

Cypermethrin 30

Alfacypermethrin 15

Lambdacyhalothrin 25

Total 90

4. Others

Chlorpyrifos 200

Profenophos 80

Flubendiamide

Fipronil

Muprofezin

Novaluron

Curazin

Pericycuron

Chlorantranilprole

Total

5. Fungicides

Azoles

Tricyclazole 20

Tebuconazole 5

Hexaconazole 10

Propiconazole 5

Difenconazole

Others

Flutrilafol

Total 70

Grand Total 1360

Water requirement of 15m3/day will be sourced from the ground water

source. Waste water generation will be 5m3/day. Waste water will be treated in ETP. Treated effluent after primary, secondary and tertiary treatment will be used for green belt development. Power requirement of 350 KVA will be met from the State Electricity Board. One DG set of 250 KVA is proposed for emergency power back up. Process emissions in the form of HCl will be scrubbed with scrubber.. Emissions from the DG set will be controlled through stack height of 30 m. Solid waste generation will be in the form of ETP sludge and used oil which will be disposed of as per Hazardous Waste(Management ,Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2008.

The proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee -2 in its 7th meeting held in January, 2010. The Committee noted that the company is manufacturing pesticide formulations. The raw material for pesticide formulation is being obtained from the M/s United Phosphrous. Now it is proposed to manufacture Technical Grade Pesticides. The Committee sought the information regarding raw material to be used, details of reactions for manufacturing the products and mass balance of each product. The proponent could not provide the satisfactory information. The Committee decided that in the absence of the requisite details, TORs cannot be provided. The Committee sought following information and deferred the proposal.

i. Detailed pre-feasibility report along with list of raw materials and source

ii. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions and mass balance of each product.

On receipt of above information, proposal was placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee. The Committee noted that it is proposed to recycle the treated effluent. The committee advised the project proponent that the treated effluent shall be evaporated and solid obtained should be disposed of to the TSDF at Pali in Faridabad.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking the EIA study:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. Infrastructure facilities, existing and proposed including power

sources. 7. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment protection

measures. 8. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details

providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc. 9. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10 km

radius. Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 10 km radius of the project.

10. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.

11. Details of the total land and break-up of the land use for green belt and other uses.

12. List of products (existing & proposed) along with the production capacities.

13. List of raw material required and source. 14. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions. 15. Design details of ETP & boiler. 16. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 17. Ambient air quality data for one season other than monsoon regarding

PM10, SO2, NOx and VOC at 6 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

18. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 19. One season data other than monsoon for water and Noise monitoring. 20. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and


21. ?Permission? for the drawl of ground water from the CGWA/SGWB. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged along with characteristics of treated effluent.

22. Ground water monitoring at 6 locations should be carried out.

23. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste.

24. Risk assessment for storage and handling of chemicals/solvents. 25. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 26. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 27. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 28. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 29. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference




32. A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TORs.





attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report. (vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the

issues in this letter. The index of the final EIA-EMP report must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report.


(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F. No. J -l1013/77/2004-IA II(I) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report

for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board for public hearing. The issues emerged during the meeting and response to the issues shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report. The final EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.2.20 Proposed expansion project with Backward Integration- Manufacturing of Manmade fiber other than rayon-Polyester Oriented Yarn (POY)/Fully Drawn Yarn (FDY) using polyester chips at Village Naroli, District Silvassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli by M/s Jiwarajka Textile Industries. Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant Unistar Environment and

Research Lab Pvt Limited gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The manmade fibre manufacturing units are listed at 5(d) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?B? category projects and have to be appraised by SEIAA/UTEIAA level. Since, the project location is at a distance of 2 kms within the interstate boundary of Gujarat, as per general condition of EIA Notification, 2006, proposal has been appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the centre level. The public hearing is not required as the unit is located in the Government Notified Industrial Area.

The Committee categorized the project as ?B2? since expansion will be

carried within existing land area of 22100 m2 and this is a backward integration of the project by using POY as a primary raw material for manufacturing polyester texturized yarn which is the existing product of the company and there will be zero discharge of effluent.

After the proposed expansion capacity of poly-texturised yarn (PTY) will

be 71,000 MTPA and Partially Oriented Yarn (POY) /fully drawn yarn would be 71,000 MTPA. Cost of the project is Rs. 78.02 crores.

Power requirement of 7500 KVA will be met from the Electricity Department, Silvassa. Fresh Water requirement of 130m3/d will be met from the bore well. Total waste water generation will be 33 m3/d of which 15 m3/d will be from cooling tower / boiler blow down. The effluent after treatment and conforming to the prescribed standards will be used for green belt development. Domestic waste water (18 m3/d) will be disposed off through septic tank.

There are no sources of process emissions. The gaseous emission from three nos. of DG sets of 1250 KVA each will be dispersed through stack of height as per CPCB / State Pollution Control Board standards.

The hazardous / solid waste will be generated in the form of ETP sludge

(1.6 MTPM) which will be sent to GEPIL site, Silvassa for final disposal. The yarn waste (1.0 MTPM) and texturised yarn waste (1.2 MTPM) will be recycled back / sold to actual users. The used oil (2.5 KL/annum) will be sold to registered recyclers or sent to TSDF site. The empty drums (300 Nos. per annum) and empty bags (15 000 Nos./months) will be reused for packing / sold to authorized recyclers.


1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. A notification to confirm that the unit is located in the notified industrial

area. 5. Regulatory framework 6. Project location and Plant layout. 7. Infrastructure facilities, existing and proposed including power


measures. 9. Project site location along with site map of 5 km area and site details

providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc. 10. Present land use of the study area of 5 km radius. Location of National

Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 5 km radius of the project.




14. List of raw material required and source. 15. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions. 16. Design details of ETP & boiler. 17. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 18. Ambient air quality data for one season other than monsoon regarding

PM10, SO2, NOx and VOC at 4 locations within the study area of 5km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

19. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 20. One season data other than monsoon for water and Noise monitoring.

21. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features.

22. ?Permission? for the drawl of ground water from the CGWA/SGWB. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged.

23. Ground water monitoring at 6 locations should be carried out. 24. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage,

utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste along with characteristics of ETP waste.

25. Risk assessment for storage and handling of chemicals/solvents. 26. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 27. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 28. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 29. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 30. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference












(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a

certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F. No. J -l1013/77/2004-IA II(I) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The final EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. 10.2.21 Proposed Expansion of Styrene Acrylonitrile (SAN) from 72,000

MT/annum to 1,20, 000 MT/annum within existing site at Village-Katol, Tehsil Kalol, District Panchmahal, Gujarat by M/s INEOS ABS (India) Limited ? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant Kadam Environmental Consultants gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The project activity is listed at item no. 5(e) & 5 (f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? category as the unit is located outside the industrial area.

M/s INEOS ABS (India) Ltd. have proposed for expansion of Styrene Acrylonitrile (SAN) from 72,000 MT/Annum to 1,20,000 MT/Annum within the existing site at Katol Village, Kalol, Panchmahal District, Gujarat. Besides, company is manufacturing 2400 MTPA of ABS sheets in the existing plant premises. About 37645 m2 of area has been acquired. The estimated cost of the project is Rs. 33 crores.

Water requirement of 415m3/d will be met from the bore well and through tankers. Power requirement of 220 KVA will be met from MGVCL. There is no wastewater generated from process. About 74m3/d of waste water will be generated from the floor washings , utilities and cooling which after treatment will be used for green belt within the plant premises. Domestic waste water (30m3/d ) will be disposed through septic tank/soak pit.

Solid /hazardous waste will be generated in the form of ETP sludge, used resin, ash from incinerator and boiler (90.92 MTPA) will be sent to NECL for disposal. The incinerable waste (951.08MTPA) will be sent to BEIL for incineration. Discarded containers (50 nos./annum) will be sent to authorized reprocessors. The used oil will be sold to registered reprocessors.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detail EIA Study;

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. Infrastructure facilities, existing and proposed including power sources. 7. Total cost of the project along with realistic estimates and cost for

environment protection measures. 8. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details

providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc. 9. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10 km

radius. Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 10 km radius of the project.

10. Layout of the plant including chlorine storage area 11. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative

humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall is necessary. 12. Details of the total land and break-up of the land use for green belt and

other uses. 13. List of products (existing & proposed) along with the production

capacities. 14. The Company shall explore the possibility of setting-up of caustic soda

plant. 15. List of raw material required and source. 16. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions. 17. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers. 18. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 19. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 5 km., aerial

coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

20. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 21. One season data for air, water and Noise monitoring including PM10,

SO2, NOx, and VOCs. 22. Details regarding existing status of plant with respect to existing stacks

emission data 23. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and



25. Ground water monitoring minimum at 6 locations should be carried out. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area and ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic).


27. Risk assessment for storage and handling of chemicals/solvents including transportation of Acrylonitrite.

28. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 29. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 30. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 31. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 32. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP

guidelines. 33. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference




36. A tabular chart of the issues raised and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be provided.










(Viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (I) should be considered for the preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted to the Gujarat State Pollution Control Board (GPCB) for conducting public hearing/public consultation as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs and addressing and incorporating all concerns raised during public hearing / public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for obtaining prior environmental clearance.

10.2.22 Proposed Pesticide Technical and Formulations Plant at Village

Humnabad Industrial Area, District Bidar, Karnataka by M/s Hyderabad Chemical Products Limited? reg. TORs


on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Pesticides & Pesticide intermediates manufacturing units are listed at serial no. 5(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? category and have to be appraised at central level.

M/s Hyderabad Chemical Products Ltd. have proposed to set up a Pesticide Technicals and Formulations Plant at Humnabad Industrial Area (notified by KIADB), Bidar District, Karnataka. The proposed unit is located at a distance of 55km from Bidar at Omnabad. The company has acquired an area of 13.50 acres. An area of 18796.76 m2 has been earmarked for green belt development. There are no environmentally sensitive areas within 15 km of proposed project location boundary. Cost of the project is Rs.12.90 crores


S. No.

Name of the Product Proposed Quantity (MT/Year)

1 CARTAP HYDROCHLORIDE TECHNICAL

1000

2 INDOXACARB TECHNICAL 50

3 ACEPHATE TECHNICAL 250

4 MONOCROTOPHOS TECHNICAL 600

The total power requirement of 1500 KVA will be met from GESCL. DG sets of 250 KVA capacity will be installed to meet the emergency power requirement.

The total fresh water requirement is 53 KLD which will be met from KIADB. Water consumption will be optimized by adopting water conservation & effluent re-use/recycle. About 8.6m3/d of effluent will be generated which will be forced evaporated in the multiple effect evaporator. The slurry collected will be filtered and dried before disposal to TSDF. The condensate will be recycled back to the MEE. The domestic wastewater will be treated in septic tanks and soak pits. HCl from process will be scrubbed in a wet scrubber with soda ash. Particulate emissions from the boiler will be controlled by cyclone separator and emissions will be dispersed through stack of adequate height. Solvents will be handled in closed containers to reduce losses in the form of evaporation and vent condensers are provided to tanks for further reduction. The source of noise generation would be DG set. The DG set will be provided with acoustic enclosures and the noise at the plant boundary will be <65 dBA.

Solid/ hazardous wastes will be generated in the form of residue from the MEE which will be disposed off to TSDF. Coal ash (3.5 TPD) will be disposed to brick manufacturers. The spent lubricant (0.3 KLPD) will be disposed to authorized reprocessors.

The Committee prescribed the following terms of Reference for

undertaking detailed EIA study: 1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project.

3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. A copy of the notification certifying that the unit is located in the notified

industrial area. 7. Infrastructure facilities, existing and proposed including power sources. 8. Total cost of the project along with realistic estimates and cost for

environment protection measures. 9. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details

providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc. 10. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10

km radius. Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 10 km radius of the project.

11. Layout of the plant including chlorine storage area 12. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative



capacities. 15. List of raw material required and source. 16. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions. 17. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers. 18. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 19. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial


20. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 21. One season data for air, water and Noise monitoring including PM10,

SO2, NOx, and VOCs. 22. Details regarding existing status of plant with respect to existing stacks

emission data 23. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions as

per CPCB and their control. 24. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and


25. ?Permission? for the drawl of water from the competent authority/ CGWA/SGWB. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged.



28. Risk assessment for storage and handling of chemicals/solvents including engineered systems and HAZOP study for existing plant and SOP for the existing plant.

29. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 30. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 31. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 32. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 33. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP

guidelines. 34. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference












(vi) The index of the final EIA-EMP report must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report.



It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (I) should be considered for the preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. As soon as the EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted to the MOEF for obtaining prior environmental clearance. Public hearing is not required as the unit is located in the notified industrial area.

10.2.23 Proposed Manufacturing of N.P.K. Fertilizer-30000MT/Year at

Meghnagar, District Jhabua in Madhya Pradesh by M/s Moni Minerals & Grinders Meghnagar. Reg TORs

The project authorities and their consultant namely, PACE consultants

gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The project activity is listed at 5 (a) and is of ?A? Category under the

Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and proposal has been appraised at the Centre. The unit is located in the Notified Industrial Area, and Public Hearing is not required. M/s Moni Minerals & Grinders have proposed for mmanufacturing N.P.K Fertilizer with capacity of 30,000 MT/year at A.K.V.N Industrial area, Meghnagar, Dist. Jhabua, Madhya Pradesh. The proposed unit is located in notified industrial area. NPK Grade 1 (20:20:10), NPK Grade 2 (20:20:0) & NPK Grade 3 (12:32:16) are the different products that would be manufactured with a total production capacity of 30,000 MT/year. The unit has acquired an area of 60492 sq.ft of which 20,000 sq.ft has been earmarked for green belt development. The total estimated cost of project is Rs. 260 Lacs. The power required for the unit is 275 HP and will be met from MPEB. 2.5 MT/day (approx.) of coal would be used. The water requirement of 6m3/d will be met from AKVN supply and bore wells. There is no generation of effluent from the process. Sewage shall be treated through septic tank and disposed to soak pit. The coal ash generated from boiler will be disposed to brick manufacturers.

There is no generation of hazardous waste. Particulate emissions from the coal fired boiler will be controlled by two stage cyclone dust collector.

The Committee prescribed the following terms of reference for undertaking

detailed EIA/EMP studies:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. A map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing the location of

Wildlife Sanctuary vis-à-vis project location and the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden.

7. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 8. A copy of the notification certifying that the unit is located in the notified

industrial area. 9. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment protection

measures. 10. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. Location

of national parks, wildlife sanctuary within 10 km. radius should specifically be mentioned.

11. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.

12. A list of industries containing name and type within 10 km radius of the plant.

13. List of raw material required and source should be included. 14. Raw material shall be kept in stacks and all the sides should be covered

up to 6 m height. 15. Manufacturing process details. 16. Storage and transportation of raw materials and products. 17. Measures to control total fluoride. 18. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers/bag filter/cyclones. 19. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 20. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 5 km., aerial

coverage from project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.

21. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modelling for specific pollutants needs to be done.

22. Plant-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control of emissions from all the sources.

23. One season data for gaseous emissions. 24. Permission for the drawl of water from the concerned Department and

water balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and

reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.

25. Surface water quality of nearby rivers and other surface drains at eight locations must be ascertained.

26. Details of water source available in the impact area. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations

27. Design details of the ETP and air pollution control equipments. 28. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization. 29. Impact of transport of the raw materials and end products on the

surrounding environment should be assessed and provided. 30. Risk assessment and damage distance and control measures needs to be

addressed. 31. Occupational health Surveillance of the workers needs elaboration. 32. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for rainwater

harvesting have to be put in place. 33. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon. 34. Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for the fertilizer

plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared. 35. Name and location of the TSDF along with membership should be

incorporated. 36. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to

details of air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency, responsibility and time bound implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.










(vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the issues in this letter and that raised in Public Hearing/consultation along with duly filled in Industry Sector questionnaire. The index of the final EIA-EMP report, must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues and the issues raised in the Public hearing have been incorporated.


(viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) decided that the proponent may be communicated the above ?TORs? for the preparation of EIA/EMP. The EIA/EMP reports shall be submitted to Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. Public hearing is not required as the unit is located in the notified industrial area. Any Other Item

10.2.24 Expansion of Urea Fertilizer Plant at Babrala District Badaun in Uttar Pradesh by M/s Tata Chemicals Limited? reg. Amendment in Environmental Clearance

M/s Tata Chemicals Limited were accorded environmental clearance on 4th December, 2009 for expansion of Ammonia-urea Fertilizer plant (Babrala-II) District Badaun in Uttar Pradesh subject to stipulation of specific safeguards. The company requesting the Ministry for amendment of specific condition no.ii and specific condition no. (vi). These conditions are reproduced below: ii. The company shall undertake measures for water conservation. The

specific water consumption shall not exceed 5.1m3/MT of urea. The waste water generated from all sources after treatment and recycle back in the process to maintain zero discharge condition. The process water

condensate shall be recycled as boiler feed water. The waste water generation shall not exceed 0.9m3/MT of urea.

vi. Specific energy consumption shall not exceed 5.127G cal/MT of urea

production. Optimization of cycle of concentration (COC) to 6 and blow down frequency from the cooling towers shall be reduced

Request of the company for amendment in above conditions were placed

before the Expert Appraisal Committee-2(Industry) for amendment of above conditions. The representative of the company informed the Committee that they have achieved the above with their own efforts of last 15 years. However, for the new plant the technology suppliers are not able to meet the requirement to start with. The company will continue to make efforts during the operation of plant to meet the above stipulated conditions. These values regarding water consumption and effluent discharged are definitely lower than the stipulated standards of 8m3 /tonne and 5m3/tonne of urea produced. There are no specific standards for energy consumption.

Regarding water consumption, the company informed that the

environmental performance of Babrala-I plant was based on last 15 years of operation and the specific water consumption of 5.1m3/MT of urea was achieved after various improvements in the processes and practices over a number of years. It would not be possible to achieve lower consumption in the initial years of operation before the appropriate measures. Further, as regards the waste water generation, effluent from various sources after collection in a pond shall be used for irrigation. However, during the rainy season, it may not be possible to use the treated effluent for green belt.

In view of the above, it has been requested that the zero effluent

discharge condition may be amended as maximizing the use of treated effluent in the green belt.

Regarding waste water generation, 0.9 m3/MT of product has been

achieved in the existing plant after operation of about 15 years. However, in the proposed plant, some more time is required. Therefore, the condition may be amended as waste water generation shall be in the range of 1.0- 2.0 m3/MT of product in stead of 0.90 m3/MT of product.

The Committee deliberated and recommended for amendment of specific

condition no.ii as follows:

?The company shall undertake measures for water conservation. The specific water consumption shall be in the range of 6.5m3/MT of urea produced. The company shall undertake measures for maximizing the use of treated effluent in the green belt. The process water condensate from ammonia and urea

plant shall be recycled back after treatment for use as boiler feed water. The corresponding waste water generation shall be 2.0m3/MT of product. However, the company shall continue efforts during the operation of plant to meet the earlier stipulated values for water consumption and effluent generation at the time of according environmental clearance.?

As regards achieving low specific consumption, the company is in the process of technology selection which shall be based on low emissions and low energy consumption. To achieve specific energy consumption of 5.127G cal/MT of urea production will not be possible from the commissioning of plant itself. However, efforts will be made in this regard. There are some factors which will influence the specific energy consumption like interruption/ curtailment of natural gas supply resulting in low operation loads or even plant shut down due to some equipments/ machinery breakdown. These are the factors which are beyond control. However, efforts will be made to achieve the specific energy consumption of 5.127 cal/MT of urea production. There are no standards for specific energy consumption for fertilizer industries. Therefore, the company requested to amend the condition by mentioning that ?Specific energy consumption shall not exceed 5.127G cal/MT ? 5.5 G cal/MT of urea production. Optimization of cycle of concentration (COC) to 6 and blow down frequency from the cooling towers shall be reduced?., to which committee agreed. 10.2.25 Expansion for 283 TPD Membrane Cell (conversion from Mercury

Cell) Caustic soda plant with 125 TPD Iron Oxide plant and installation of 2X 25 MW Cogen power plant at Sahupuram, Tiruchendur Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu by M/s DCW Ltd- amendment in environmental clearance reg.

M/s DCW Limited were accorded environmental clearance on 7th June, 2007 for expansion of Membrane Cell (conversion from Mercury Cell) Caustic soda plant from 183 TPD to 283 TPD, 125 TPD Iron Oxide plant and installation of 2X 25 MW Cogeneration power plant at Sahupuram, Tiruchendur Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu.

As per the environmental clearance accorded, the company has installed

2X125 TPH boilers. The steam to be generated from the boiler will be to the tune of 250 TPH @89 ata. The steam generated drives the steam turbine generators ( 2 nos. ) to generate total power of 50MW. The steam leaving the steam turbine (viz. 52 TPH at 12 kg/cm2 medium pressure steam and 24 TPH at 2.5kg/cm2 low pressure steam has been allocated for use in various process operations. Out of this, 15 TPH is used in caustic soda division, 15 TPH in PVC plant and 46 TPH in iron ore oxide plant. At present, the steam is being consumed in caustic soda division and PVC plant only. Since the execution of iron oxide plant is yet to be taken up, the company has to restrict steam extraction to match the current

process requirement of steam. Due to restricted steam extraction, 25 MW of power can be generated instead of 50 MW as per turbine characteristics.

To achieve power generation to the tune of 50MW, company has to

extract additional steam as per the design parameters. Therefore, to utilize extracted steam, it is proposed to install additional steam turbine generator of 8.27 MW capacity. The company will be able to generate power to the tune of 58.27MW. Additional investment will be to the tune of Rs. 18 crores.

Since there is no change in the capacity of the boiler installed for steam

generation, there will be no additional impact on the environment. It is proposed to generate additional power of 8.27 MW by installation of additional turbine to make use of the unutilized steam from the existing 2X125 TPH boiler.

In view of the above, the committee recommended for amendment in

environmental clearance for enhancement of power generation from 50MW to 58.27 MW subject to compliance of conditions stipulated in environmental clearance no. J-11011/426/2006-IA-II(I) dated 7th June, 2007 and stipulation of following additional specific conditions for compliance by the project proponent:

i. The company shall upload the status of compliance of the stipulated

environmental clearance conditions, including results of monitored data on its website and shall update the same periodically. It shall simultaneously be sent to the Regional office of MOEF, the respective Zonal office of CPCB and the State Pollution Control Board. The levels of PM 10, SO2, fluoride and NOx (ambient levels) and emissions from the stacks (Cl2, HCl and SO2) shall be monitored and displayed at a convenient location near the main gate of the company and at important public places.

ii. A copy of the clearance letter shall be sent by the proponent to concerned

Panchayat, Zila Parisad/Municipal Corporation, Urban local Body and the local NGO, if any, from who suggestions/ representations, if any , were received while processing the proposal.

iii. The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of

compliance of the stipulated E C conditions including results of monitored data (both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the respective Regional Office of MoEF, the respective Zonal Office of CPCB and the State Pollution Control Board.

iv. The environmental statement for each financial year ending 31st March in

Form-V as is mandated shall be submitted to the concerned State Pollution Control Board as prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended subsequently, shall also be put on the website of the company along with the status of compliance of environmental

clearance conditions and shall also be sent to the respective Regional Offices of MoEF by e-mail.

10.2.26 Manufacturing of Carbon black based on cracking of the refinery waste oil into Pure Carbon Viz. Carbon Black- Clarification reg.

M/s Hi-Tech Carbon (HTC) is engage in the manufacturing of Carbon

Black in their unit located at SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Gummidipoondi, Tamilnadu and planning to expand their capacity from 12500 MT per month to 18750 MT per month. The process is based on cracking of the refinery waste oil into pure carbon (carbon black) along with steam & gases. HTC has applied to the TNPCB for grant of ?Consent to Establish? on 22.12.2009 to manufacture the following products:

1. Carbon Black- 18750 T/month 2. Unvulcanized rubber compound in sheet- 750 T/month 3. Power (By product) ? 21600000 KWH

M/s High Tech carbon is manufacturing carbon black from highly aromatic petroleum oils, which are thermally cracked at high temperature in specially designed reactors. The heat for endothermic thermal cracking is supplied by either burning of partially carbon black feed stock oil or auxiliary fuel oil with process air inside the reactor itself or both. Carbon black particles formed are recovered and converted into pellets for ease of storage, handling and transportation.

The project activity regarding petrochemical complexes (Industries based

on processing of petroleum fractions and natural gas and/or reforming to aromatics) listed at Sl. No. 5 (C) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and petrochemical based processing (Processes other than cracking and reformation and not covered under the complexes) attract the provisions of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006.

As per the submission of proponent, that their process for manufacturing

carbon black is based on cracking of the refinery waste oil into the carbon black along with steam and gases, therefore, proposal does not attract the provisions of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. Further, the process of carbon black manufacturing is cracking and exempted from Section 5(e) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006.

The Committee noted that the carbon black manufacturing is from the

petroleum fractions which listed at sl.no. 5(c ) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and require environmental clearance. The Committee advised the proponent that the activity attracts provisions of

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and therefore requires environmental clearance. 10.2.27 Proposed 60 KLPD Grain Based Distillery unit at Village: Dubi, P.S. Nirsa

at Dhuvi in District: Dhanbad in Jharkhand by M/s Ankur Biochem Private Limited ? reg. EC after TORs

Proposal of M/s Ankur Biochem Private Limited was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 6th meeting held on 14th December, 2009. The Committee sought the following information for reconsideration of project:

i. Measures to control fugitive emissions during coal handling. ii. Base line data for PM 10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx. iii. Details of the fire fighting system for storage and handling of

alcohol and risk mitigation measures due to fire and explosion.

The Ministry issued a circular no. J-11013/5/2010-IA-II (I) dated 13th

January, 2010 regarding consideration of projects for environmental clearance based on CEPI with immediate effect. As per the report, the industrial clusters/ areas having aggregated CEPI scores of 70 and above should be considered as critically polluted; the clusters/ areas having CEPI scores between 60-70 should be considered as severally polluted areas and shall be kept under surveillance and pollution control measures should be efficiently implemented; and the critically polluted industrial clusters / areas need further detailed investigations in terms of the extent of damage and formulation of appropriate remedial action plan.

The Dhanbad District falls in the critically polluted area as per the CEPI

score. The proponent have submitted an additional information for reconsideration of the project and also requested the Ministry that their project should be reconsidered in light of circular dated 15th march, 2010. As per the circular dated 15th March, 2010 Dhanbad District has four critically polluted areas viz. Sadar (Dhanbad Municipality), Jharia (Jharia Municipality, Sindri Industrial Area), Govindpur (Govindpur Industrial Estate) and Nirsa. The proposed site is located at Village Dhuvi at a distance of 12km from the Nirsa. They explained that Nirsa in various correspondence as earlier mentioned is a nearby town on the connected highway. Their project is located at village Dhuvi, Lakhiabad which is away from the Nirsa and does not fall in the critically polluted area.

The Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance

subject to stipulation of following specific conditions: 1. The storage of spent wash shall not be more than 5 days.

2. Ground water quality monitoring shall be carried around the plant and data submitted to the RO, MoEF/CPCB/State Pollution Control Board.

3. The bagasse shall be stored in covered storage. 4. Fire Fighting System shall be as per the OISD-117 Norms and cover

all areas where alcohol is produced, handled and stored. 5. Provision of foam system for fire fighting to control fire from the alcohol



30th April, 2010

10.3.1 Proposed new project at Village Behra, Tehsil Derabassi, District Mohali in Punjab by M/s Infinity Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. - Reg. Environmental Clearance

The project authorities and their consultant Vee R Engineers, Mohali, Punjab gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.

The proposal regarding proposed new project at Village Behra, Tehsil

Derabassi, District Mohali in Punjab by M/s Infinity Laboratories Pvt. Ltd was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee-2 (Industry) in its 8th meeting held during 9-10th February, 2010. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the Final EIA report to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. Public hearing is not required as the unit is located in the Free Enterprise Zone, which is a notified industrial area.

The project activity is listed at Sl. No. 5(f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 under category ?B? as the project is located in the notified industrial area. Due to location of the project within 10km distance of the interstate boundary, as per general condition of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, proposal has been appraised at the Centre. M/s Infinity Laboratories Pvt. Ltd have submitted a proposal to manufacture active pharmaceuticals ingredient intermediates for highly prescribed latest generation medicines. The unit will be located in an area of 2 acres which has already been acquired. The details of the products to be manufactured include the following:

Sl. No. Product

Capacity Per annum

1. D- p Hydroxy phenyl glycine Dane Salt 478.5 TPA

2. D- phenyl glycine Dane Salt 470.25 TPA

3. 7 AVCA 58.080 TPA

4. Cefuroxime Acid 66 TPA

5. By product Sodium Sulphate 235 TPA

Water requirement of 80.5m3/d will be met from the ground water source.

About 33.30m3/d of effluent will be generated of which 3.0m3/d will be the domestic effluent. The effluent will be segregated based on the pollution load. The high TDS and high COD effluent will be generated in the form of mother liquors, washings and spent scrubber solution which will be evaporated in the multiple effect evaporator. The high organic low TDS residues for process will be incinerated. The high TDS and high Organic Slurry / residues after evaporation will be sent to TSDF. The low TDS / low organic from process and evaporator, DM plant softener and effluent from the floor washing will be treated in the effluent treatment plant for primary, secondary and tertiary treatment and treated effluent will be reused for irrigation and utilities. The domestic effluent (3.0m3/d) would be sent to septic tank for treatment. Power requirement of 600 KVA will be met from the PSEB. It is proposed to install 1.5 TPH boiler fired on wood and pet coke to meet the steam requirement. A DG set of 600 KW will be installed to meet the power requirement during emergency. The flue gases from the DG set and gaseous emissions from the boiler will be dispersed through stack of adequate height. Particulate emissions from the boiler will be scrubbed through scrubber and emission from the incinerator will be scrubbed through double scrubber. The scrubbed water will be taken to multiple effect evaporator. Process emissions in the form of HCl and other acidic fumes will be scrubbed with scrubber. The emissions from the scrubber will be dispersed through stack of 3m height above the roof level. The hazardous/ solid waste will be generated in the form of solid residue from MME (1160 kg/day), spoilt powders / spills (10kg/day) and process impurities will be incinerated. The ETP sludge (14.2 kg/day) and incinerator ash (111 kg/day) will be sent to TSDF at Nimbua. The empty drums after decontamination will be sold.

The Committee after detailed deliberation recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to stipulation of following additional specific environmental safeguards:

i. The company shall carry out VOC monitoring in all the areas

where solvents are handled and used including ETP.

ii. The company shall carryout stack monitoring for incinerator as per the procedure laid by the CPCB and data submitted to the RO of MoEF, CPCB and SPCB.

iii. The flue gas emissions from the incinerator shall be scrubbed

with packed tower and emission shall conform to the State Pollution Control Board standards. The specification of incinerator shall be as per CPCB guidelines.

iv. To minimize the SO2 emission, lime injection shall be used for

the pet coke burning.

v. To control the particulate emissions from the boiler, dust collector /cyclone separators shall be provided.

vi. The company shall explore the possibility of use of LPG instead

of HSD in the DG set.

10.3.2 Proposed Resins manufacturing unit at, Village Shikra, Taluka Bhachau, District Kutch in Gujarat by M/s Euro Ceramics Limited. Reg. Environmental Clearance

The proposal regarding Proposed Resins manufacturing unit at Village

Shikra, Taluka Bhachau, District Kutch in Gujarat by M/s Euro Ceramics Limited was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee(Industry) in its 94th meeting held during 12-14th May, 2009. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the Final EIA report to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

Public hearing of the project was held on 29th January, 2010. The issues

raised during the public hearing were regarding land use pattern , generation of waste water, impact of the proposed project on the environment, funds earmarked for development activity of the nearby villages and socio economic development activities undertaken around the project and provision of employment. All the above issues have been addressed by the project proponent.

The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under A or B category depending upon the location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. This is ?A? category project as it is located outside the industrial area.

M/s Euro Ceramics Ltd. and their consultant Aqua-Air Engineers Pvt Ltd gave detailed presentation on the project. It is proposed to set up a unsaturated

Polyester Resins manufacturing unit of capacity 750 MTPM in Dist: Kutch, Gujarat. No eco-sensitive areas are located within 10 km radius of the plant. Cost of the project will be Rs. 5.00 crores.

Power requirement of 300 KW will be met from the captive power plant of 10MW capacity from the existing unit. Fuel requirement will be lignite (7 MT/day). Particulate emissions from the boiler are controlled by ESP and emissions are dispersed through stack of adequate height.

The water requirement for the ceramic in resin unit is 607m3/day and waste generation is 74m3/day. For resin plant water requirement of 9m3/day will be met from the rain water harvesting and Gujarat Water Supply and Sewage Board. The total waste water generation will be 2.7m3/day. There will no process effluent generation. Other waste water generated will be neutralized and will be used for cooling tower as make up water. Domestic effluent will be disposed through septic tank/soak pit. There will not be any process gas emission generation from the proposed unit. There will not be any solid waste generation from the proposed unit. There will not be any solid waste generation from the proposed unit.

The Committee deliberated on the various issues and sought following

additional information for reconsideration:

(i) Details of various raw materials used for manufacturing of ceramic and resin

(ii) Disposal plan for Coal Tar (iii) A report on the risk analysis and risk assessment

10.3.3 Expansion of product change with expended quantity in existing unit at

plot no. 108/1&2, Ravi Industrial Estate, Chhatral, Mehsana Highway, District Gandhi Nagar in Gujarat by M/s Mahalaxmi Industries - Reg. Environmental Clearance

The proposal regarding Expansion of product change with expended

quantity in existing unit at plot no. 108/1&2, Ravi Industrial Estate, Chhatral, Mehsana Highway, District Gandhi Nagar in Gujarat by M/s Mahalaxmi Industries was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee(Industry) in its 1st Expert Appraisal Committee-2(I) meeting held during 20-21st July, 2009. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the draft EIA report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing.

The Ravi Industrial Estate has recently been declared as notified area as

per Gujarat Government Notification no. GID-102008-1125(PAFA)/G dated 8.10.2009. The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) categorized under ?B?

category of EIA Notification, 2006,as the plant is located inside the notified industrial area.

The Committee decided to transfer the project to the SEIAA for further consideration as this is ?B? Category project. The committee felt that at this stage it may not be appropriate to transfer the case to the SEIAA. 10.3.4 Proposed Dye Intermediates manufacturing unit at Plot No. 108/7,

Ravi Industrial Estate, Bhileshwarpura, Kalol ? Mehsana Highway Chhatral Taluka Kalol in District Gandhinagar in Gujarat by M/s Dev Impex - Reg. Environmental Clearance

The proposal regarding Proposed Dye Intermediates manufacturing unit at

Plot No. 108/7, Ravi Industrial Estate, Bhileshwarpura, Kalol ? Mehsana Highway Chhatral Taluka Kalol in District Gandhinagar in Gujarat by M/s Dev Impex was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee(Industry) in its 89th Expert Appraisal Committee(I) meeting held during 22nd -23rd December, 2008. The Committee prescribed the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the draft EIA report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing.

The Ravi Industrial Estate has recently been declared as notified area as

per Gujarat Government Notification no. GID-102008-1125(PAFA)/G dated 08.10.2009. The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) categorized under ?B? category of EIA Notification, 2006,as the plant is located inside the notified industrial area.

The Committee decided to transfer the project to the SEIAA for further consideration as this is ?B? Category project. The committee felt that at this stage it may not be appropriate to transfer the case to the SEIAA. 10.3.5 New Ammonia/Urea Fertilizer plant within the existing plant premises of

Talcher Fertilizer Complex at District Angul in Orissa by M/s The Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited.- Reg. TORs

M/s The Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited have proposed for New Ammonia/Urea Fertilizer plant within the existing plant premises of Talcher Fertilizer Complex at District Angul in Orissa The Committee noted that the project falls in Angul District which is listed at Sl. no. 7 of the cluster/ industrial area of the report on comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index. The CEPI score for Angul is 82.09 and is considered as critically polluted area. The Committee decided that the proposal may be returned as per the instructions given in circular no. J-11013/5/2010-IA-II (I) dated 13th January, 2010 issued by the Ministry which is also posted on the Ministry?s website www.envfor.nic.in .

Subsequently, a communication dated 8th February, 2010 was received from Secretary, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers interalia to the effect that the Government of India had decided to revive the project in public interest because it is critical in nature and of national importance. Keeping in view the cogent arguments of Secretary, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, especially the Importance of National self sufficiency in fertilizers and various steps taken by the Ministry for the revival of fertilizer plants, this is a case for invoking para 4.1.2 of O M No. J-11013/5/2010-IA-II (I) dated 13th January, 2010. M/s FCIL have proposed to revive its closed unit for Ammonia-Urea Plant within the existing plant premises of Angul Fertilizer Complex at Angul in District Burdwan, West Bengal. The operation in the Angul unit was stopped in 31.03.1997 and declared closed on 30.07.2002. The BIFR confirmed winding up on 02.04.2004. The proposed project involves the manufacturing of chemical fertilizers which is listed at item no item no. 5 (a) under Category A of EIA Notification 2006. The total land available under FCIL Angul ownership is around 890 acres comprising of Plant and non plant buildings. The natural gas requirement of 2.2 MMSCMD will be supplied through Kakinada ? Haldia- Jagdishpur pipeline from KG Basin. The end product is urea with plant capacity of urea ? 3500 MTPD, Ammonia ? 2000 MTPD and captive power ? 25 MW (1+1). The expected cost of project Total project cost will be Rs.4517 Crores. . The normal power requirement (20 MW) of the proposed plant is envisaged to be met by new captive power plant. New NG based gas turbo generator set (1+1) of 25 MW ISO rating capacity will be installed. The exhaust gas from the gas turbine and supplementary firing in HRSG boiler shall be utilized for generating HP steam required for the urea plant. For start up purposes, steam will be made available by fresh firing of natural gas in the HRSG of CPP. For emergency, 2000 KVA DG set would be installed. The approximate fuel (NG) consumption for GTG/HRSG would be 202,608 Sm3/day and for Reformer would be 475,000 Sm3/day

Raw water requirement of around 20,664 m3/day will be met from Brahmini River through existing networks of pipeline. Sewage will be treated in STP. All contaminated effluents will be treated and recycled. Plant washings contaminated with oil shall be treated for oil removal and pumped into the existing effluent disposal system, together with cooling water blow down.

The solid wastes generated in the proposed ammonia-urea plant are spent catalysts, metal scraps, used bags & containers etc. The spent catalysts would be sold to catalyst manufactures for recovery of valuable metals or stored in sealed containers & sold to approved agencies. Sewage sludge shall be used as manure and ETP sludge will be disposed as per standard guidelines.

The Committee prescribed the following terms of reference for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP studies:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 7. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment protection




10. A list of industries along with name and type within 10 km radius of the plant.

11. List of raw material required and source should be included. 12. Manufacturing process details. 13. Storage and transportation of raw materials and products. 14. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers/bag filter/cyclones. 15. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 16. Ambient air quality for PM10, SO2, NOx, NH3, HC (methane& non-

methane) at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.



19. One season data for gaseous emissions and existing plant emission data 20. Permission for the drawl of water from the concerned Department and

water balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.

21. TDS level of lake water which is the source of water for the plant. 22. Surface water quality of nearby rivers and other surface drains at eight

locations must be ascertained. 23. Details of water source available in the impact area. Ground water

monitoring minimum at 8 locations 24. Design details of the ETP and air pollution control equipments 25. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization. 26. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the

surrounding environment should be assessed and provided. 27. Reason for storage for ammonia as whole of the ammonia will be

converted into urea.

28. Risk assessment and damage distance and control measures needs to be addressed.

29. Occupational health Surveillance of the workers needs elaboration. 30. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for rainwater


plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared. 33. Name and location of the TSDF alongwith membership should be





37. A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TORs. The following general points should be noted:







(vii) While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the proponents and instructions for the consultants issued by MoEF vide O.M. No. J-

11013/41/2006-IA.II (I) dated 4th August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry should also be followed.


The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be communicated the above ?TORs? for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the Orissa Pollution Control Board (OPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing and incorporating all concerns raised during public hearing/public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MoEF for consideration of prior environmental clearance.

10.3.6 New Ammonia/Urea Fertilizer plant within the existing plant premises of

Sindri Fertilizer complex at District Dhanbad in Jharkhand by M/s The Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited- Reg. TORs

M/s The Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited have proposed for Ammonia/Urea Fertilizer plant within the existing plant premises of Sindri Fertilizer complex at District Dhanbad in Jharkhand. The proposal was placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 7th meeting held on 16th January, 2010. The Committee noted that the project falls in Dhanbad District which is listed at Sl. no. 13 of the cluster/ industrial area of the report on Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index. The CEPI score for Dhanbad is 78.63 and is considered as critically polluted area. The Committee decided that the proposal may be returned as per the instructions given in circular no. J-11013/5/2010-IA-II (I) dated 13th January, 2010 issued by the Ministry which is also posted on the Ministry?s website www.envfor.nic.in .

Based on further clarification from CPCB, Ministry issued circular on 15th March, 2010. As per the above circular Sindri Industrial Area has been identified as Critically Polluted Area. The proposed Ammonia ? Urea Fertilizer plant at Sindri is not the part of the Sindri Industrial Area. Therefore the project location is not in the Critically Polluted Area. M/s FCIL have proposed to revive its closed unit for Ammonia-Urea Plant within the existing plant premises of Sindri Fertilizer Complex at Sindri in

District Dhanbad in Jharkhand. The operation in the Sindri unit was stopped in 16th March 2002 and Government of India decided to close the unit on 10.09.2002. The BIFR confrrmed winding up on 2nd April, 2004. The proposed project involves the manufacturing of chemical fertilizers which is listed at item no item no. 5 (a) under Category A of EIA Notification 2006. The total land available is about 6652 acres comprising of Plant and township. The natural gas requirement of 2.2 MMSCMD will be supplied through Kakinada ? Haldia- Jagdishpur pipeline from KG Basin. The end product is urea with plant capacity of urea ? 3500 MTPD, Ammonia ? 2000 MTPD and captive power ? 25 MW (1+1). The expected cost of project Total project cost will be Rs.4505 Crores. The power requirement (20 MW) of the proposed plant is envisaged to be met by new captive power plant. New NG based gas turbo generator set (1+1) of 25 MW ISO rating capacity will be installed. The exhaust gas from the gas turbine and supplementary firing in HRSG boiler shall be utilized for generating HP steam required for the urea plant. For start up purposes, steam will be made available by fresh firing of natural gas in the HRSG of CPP. For emergency, 2000 KVA DG set would be installed. The approximate fuel (NG) consumption for GTG/HRSG would be 202,608 Sm3/day and for Reformer would be 475,000 Sm3/day

Raw water requirement of about 20,664 m3/day will be met from Damodar River through existing networks of pipeline. Sewage will be treated in STP. All contaminated effluents will be treated and recycled. Plant washings contaminated with oil shall be treated for oil removal and pumped into the existing effluent disposal system, together with cooling water blow down.









11. List of raw material required and source should be included. 12. Manufacturing process details. 13. Storage and transportation of raw materials and products. 14. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers/bag filter/cyclones. 15. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 16. Ambient air quality for PM10, SO2, NOx, NH3, HC (methane& non-






21. TDS level of lake water which is the source of water for the plant. 22. Surface water quality of nearby rivers and other surface drains at eight

locations must be ascertained. 23. Details of water source available in the impact area. Ground water

monitoring minimum at 8 locations 24. Design details of the ETP and air pollution control equipments 25. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization. 26. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the


converted into urea. 28. Risk assessment and damage distance and control measures needs to be




incorporated.

34. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to details of air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency, responsibility and time bound implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.



37. A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TORs. The following general points should be noted:









The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be communicated the above ?TORs? for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the Jharkhand Pollution Control Board (JPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing and incorporating all concerns raised during public hearing/public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MoEF for consideration of prior environmental clearance.

10.3.7 Ammonia/Urea Fertilizer plant within the existing plant premises of

Durgapur Fertilizer Unit at HFCL at District Burdwan in West Bengal by M/s The Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation Limited- Reg. TORs

M/s Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation Limited submitted a proposal for ammonia/ urea fertilizer plant with in the existing plant premises on Durgapur Fertilizer unit at Durgapur in District Burdwan in West Bengal. The project was considered by EAC in its meeting on 16.01.2010. It was noted that the project falls in Burdwan District which is listed at Sl. no. 52 of the cluster/ industrial area of the report on Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index. The CEPI score for Durgapur is 68.26 and is considered as severely polluted area. The Committee advised the proponent to submit the proposal to the State Pollution Control Board to obtain their written comments with respect to pollution load in term of Ambient Air Quality/ Water Quality or solid/ hazardous waste management as per the circular no. J-11013/18/2009-IA-II (I) dated 25th August, 2009 and J-11013/5/2010-IA-II (I) dated 13th January, 2010 posted on the Ministry?s website www.envfor.nic.in . Subsequently, a communication dated 8th February, 2010 was received from Secretary, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers interalia to the effect that the Government of India had decided to revive the project in public interest because it is critical in nature and of national importance. Keeping in view the cogent arguments of Secretary, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, especially the Importance of National self sufficiency in fertilizers and various steps taken by the Ministry for the revival of fertilizer plants, this is a case for invoking para 4.1.2 of O M No. J-11013/5/2010-IA-II (I) dated 13th January, 2010. M/s HFCL have proposed to revive its closed unit for Ammonia-Urea Plant within the existing plant premises of Durgapur Fertilizer Complex at Durgapur in District Burdwan, West Bengal. The operation in the Durgapur unit was stopped in 1997 and declared closed. The BIFR conformed winding up on 12.12.2001. The proposed project involves the manufacturing of chemical fertilizers which is listed at item no item no. 5 (a) under Category A of EIA Notification 2006. The total land available under HFCL Durgapur ownership is around 785 acres comprising of Plant area ? 540 acres and Township - 245 acres. The natural gas requirement of 2.2 MMSCMD will be supplied through Kakinada ? Haldia- Jagdishpur pipeline from KG Basin. The end product is urea with plant capacity

of urea ? 3500 MTPD, Ammonia ? 2000 MTPD and captive power ? 25 MW (1+1). The expected cost of project Total project cost will be Rs.4501 Crores. . The normal power requirement (20 MW) of the proposed plant is envisaged to be met by new captive power plant. New NG based gas turbo generator set (1+1) of 25 MW ISO rating capacity will be installed. The exhaust gas from the gas turbine and supplementary firing in HRSG boiler shall be utilized for generating HP steam required for the urea plant. For start up purposes, steam will be made available by fresh firing of natural gas in the HRSG of CPP. For emergency, 2000 KVA DG set would be installed. The approximate fuel (NG) consumption for GTG/HRSG would be 202,608 Sm3/day and for Reformer would be 475,000 Sm3/day

Raw water requirement of around 20,664 m3/day will be met from Damodar River through existing networks of pipeline. Sewage will be treated in STP. All contaminated effluents will be treated and recycled. Plant washings contaminated with oil shall be treated for oil removal and pumped into the existing effluent disposal system, together with cooling water blow down.









11. List of raw material required and source should be included. 12. Manufacturing process details. 13. Storage and transportation of raw materials and products. 14. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers/bag filter/cyclones.

15. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 16. Ambient air quality for PM10, SO2, NOx, NH3, HC (methane & non-








23. Design details of the ETP and air pollution control equipments 24. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization. 25. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the


converted into urea. 27. Risk assessment and damage distance and control measures needs to be


















The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be communicated the above ?TORs? for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing and incorporating all concerns raised during public hearing/public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MoEF for consideration of prior environmental clearance.

10.3.8 Proposed Additional Tankage for Motor Sprit and facilities for receipt, storage and delivery thro Tank Lorries of ATF at Village Karavanthuruthy, Tehsil & District Kozhikode, Kerala by M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities gave a detailed presentation on the salient features

of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The activity regarding isolated storages is listed at 6(b) of EIA Notification,

2006. This is a ?B? category project. Since, SEIAA for Kerala has not been constituted proposal has been appraised at the Centre. M/s IOCL has proposed to construct facilities for receipt, storage and delivery of Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF) and additional tankage for motor spirit (MS) at the existing Kozhikode Depot in Kozhikode District in Kerala. At present, ATF is received a Aviation Fuel Station, Calicut directly from Kochi Refineries limited through tank trucks at a distance of about 200 km. Existing storage capacity for ATF is only 740 KL. 4 mild steel tanks (above ground) of different capacities aggregating 6665 KL (Motor Spirit - 905 KL; Aviation Turbine Fuel ? 5760 KL) are proposed in the existing storage depot. 3 pumps, 2 tank lorry filling bays and related piping etc. are also proposed to be installed/constructed. M/s IOCL have already acquired 9.27 ha of land area for the depot. No additional water requirement for water storage will be required for the additional facilities. The additional facilities proposed will be accumulated with in the already acquired area. The depot was established in 1997 conforming to the OISD standards. The pipeline for the additional facilities will be laid above ground. The railway line is at a distance of 200m.

Motor spirit will be stored in the floating roof tanks to minimize the air pollution. Storm water from tank farm, pump house, TLF will be routed through oil water separator before discharging the effluent. No solid waste will be generated. Storage and distribution of petroleum products will be done in a closed system with precautions to minimize hazards. The facilities/installations will conform to standards laid by PESO & OISD. Existing water storage capacity (2256 kl) and fire pumps (2X410kl/hour ) would be adequate to meet the requirement of the additional tanks. Safety distances between the facilities are provided as per PESO /OISD norms. Also fire water tanks and pumps would be located 30 m away from this area as per OISD 117 norms.

The Committee discussed the location details, safety aspects, transportation of the gas and its storage etc. After detailed deliberations, the Expert Appraisal Committee prescribed the following ?TORs? for preparation of EIA/EMP:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Revised form-1. 3. Land used details of the site based on satellite imagery.

4. Project Description and Project Benefits 5. Proposal for safety buffer zone around the proposed site with map. 6. Detailed layout plan with provision of trucks parking area. 7. Details of the storage and technical specifications with safety aspects &

standards 8. Site details including satellite imagery for 5 km around the site. 9. Details of river crossings drain crossing, railway/road crossing etc. and

method of digging/drilling for laying of pipeline. 10. Land use along with maps & cropping pattern, vegetation Ecology, Flora &

Fauna. 11. Details within 500m w.r.t all establishments/railway line/habitation etc. 12. Demography & Socio-economics of the area. 13. Baseline data collection for air, water and soil for:

i. Ambient Air Quality monitoring for PM10, SO2, NOx ii. Background levels of hydrocarbons (methane & non

methane HC) and VOCs iii. Soil sample analysis iv. Base line underground and surface water quality in the

vicinity of project. v. Climatology & Meteorology including wind speed, wind

direction, temperature, rainfall etc. vi. Measurement of Noise levels

14. Details of water consumption and source of water supply, waste water

generation, treatment and utilization of treated water generated from the facilities and effluent disposal

15. Detailed solid waste generation, collection, segregation, its recycling and reuse, treatment and disposal

16. Assessment of impact on air , water, soil, solid/hazardous waste and noise levels

17. Details of proposed preventive measures for leakages and accident. 18. Adequate width of approach road to avoid congestion and to have safe

exit in emergencies. 19. Environmental Management Plan 20. Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan

i. Identification of hazards ii. Consequence Analysis iii. Risk Assessment & proposed measures for Risk

Reduction 21. Details of proposed occupational Health Surveillance program for the

employees and other labour. 22. Environmental Monitoring programme. 23. To represent during public hearing process and to address all the

environmental concerns based on the feed back of public hearing and to

finalize the EIA report after making appropriate changes to draft EIA/EMP report.


25. A tabular chart indicating point-wise compliance of the TOR. The following general points should be noted: (i) All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered. (ii) Period/date of data collection should be clearly indicated. (iii) Authenticated English translation of all material provided in Regional


attach a copy of the letter. (v) The copy of the letter received from the Ministry should be also attached

as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report. (vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the

issues in this letter and that raised in Public Hearing/consultation along with duly filled in Industry Sector questionnaire. The index of the final EIA-EMP report, must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues and the issues raised in the Public hearing have been incorporated.



The Committee decided that the proponent should prepare EIA/EMP Report based on the above TORs including other information as given in generic structure of EIA and submit the same to the SPCB for conducting public hearing/consultation. The EIA/EMP Report should be as per the generic structure given in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006. The concerns emerged during the Public Consultation should be incorporated in the EIA/EMP Report and the final EIA/EMP submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.3.9 Installation of ?Emulsion Butadiene Rubber (E-SBR) Unit? at Panipat Refinery, by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. reg. TORs

M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. have proposed for Installation of Emulsion-

Styrene Butadiene Rubber (E-SBR) Unit of capacity 120,000 MTPA with allied facilities at Panipat Refinery in Panipat. The proposed project will be located in the area adjacent to Panipat Naphtha Cracker Project of Panipat refinery which would supply the feedstock and certain utilities for the project. No national park/wild life sanctuary/ reserve forest is located within 10 km radius of the project site. Land area of 28 acres for the proposed unit will be acquired through state Government. Cost of the project is Rs. 761.00 crores.

The proposal was placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee-2 (I) in its 7th meeting held during 15-16th January, 2010. The Committee noted that the Panipat District is listed at Sl. no. 37 of the cluster/ industrial area of the report on Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index (CEPI). The CEPI score for Panipat is 71.91 and is considered as critically polluted area. The Committee advised that proposal may be returned as per circular No. J-11013/5/2010-IA.II (I) dated 13th January, 2010 posted on the Ministry?s website www.envfor.nic.in .

Subsequently, Ministry issued circular dated 15th march, 2010 giving further details on the critically polluted areas in which Panipat Municipal Limit and its industrial areas are identified as critically polluted areas. M/s IOCL furnished the clarification from the District Town planner, Panipat which mentions that the area proposed for location of SBR project does not fall in the Municipal limit of Panipat and neither falls under the industrial zone. The SBR project based on butadiene available in C-4 stream at Panipat Naphtha Cracker Complex (PNCP) is intended to establish the 1st World Scale SBR capacity in the country. The project has been developed to maximize sharing of critical utilities like steam and power from the PNCP. If the project at Panipat does not materialize, the butadiene would be required to be hydrogenated prior to being recycled as feed to Cracker, which would entail additional cost by higher hydrogen consumption. Due to extraction of butadiene and subsequent conversion to SBR there would be significant saving in hydrogen consumption. Further, it is estimated that CO2 emission would be reduced by 5000kg/hr.

SBR is a value added product produced from butadiene and styrene and is principally utilized for production of automotive tyres. At present there is no SBR capacity in the country and the entire SBR requirement for tyre production is imported. The proposed SBR project while enhancing the value addition of the hydrocarbon chain would also be an import substitution project.

The project activity is listed at Sl. No. 5(e) of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and is of ?A? category.

Land area require for the project is 60 acres. Water requirement of 3000

KLPD will be met from the existing raw water system facilities available at Naphtha Cracking Unit. Waste water will be from process discharge, laboratory and sanitary water. Waste water is basically sourced from coagulation, leaching, dewatering press, exhaust gas scrubber in the finishing area and seal water for pumps. Process Waste water is first directed to neutralization pit for neutralization, and then transferred to the secondary treatment system by pump. Waste water from each process area will be discharged to neutralization pit first to adjust pH value within the required range, then discharged to liquid-solid separator to trap coagulated rubber crumbs, and then sent through a waste water treatment plant.

The solid / hazardous waste would be generated in the form of waste

rubber (20 MT/month) which would be sold or incinerated for steam generation. 185MT/month of waste butadiene and 5 MT/month of waste styrene would be generated, which would be incinerated at the E-SBR complex for steam generation. Flue gases would be dispersed through stacks. Waste lubricating oil (0.6 MT/month) would be sent to Panipat Refinery for reprocessing and sludge from ETP (8.5 MT/month) would be integrated with the existing setup.

The styrene tank is sealed with nitrogen and the discharge content has

little styrene vapor, which is not directly released to atmosphere. Waste gas containing minor styrene vapor from the air stripper will be released to exhaust gas scrubber and then dispersed through stack. The butadiene absorber is provided for the absorption of butadiene. It has an exhaust pipe, which releases inert gases from the butadiene system to prevent any pressure increase. This equipment is running continuously, using diesel to absorb butadiene, organics and then discharging inert gases to flare.

The project activities is listed at 5 (e) of the EIA Notification, 2006 and is of

?A? category and require appraisal by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detail EIA

Study; 1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. Infrastructure facilities, existing and proposed including power sources.

7. Total cost of the project along with realistic estimates and cost for environment protection measures.

8. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.

9. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10 km radius. Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 10 km radius of the project.

10. Detailed Layout of the plant. 11. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative



capacities. 14. List of raw material required and source. 15. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions. 16. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers. 17. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 18. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial


19. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 20. One season data for ambient air quality as per the standards dated

16th November, 2009, water and Noise monitoring. 21. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions as

per CPCB and their control. 22. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and




25. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste including detailed plan for disposal of waste rubber.

26. Butadiene waste shall be recycled and shall not be incinerated. 27. Details of the incinerator and destructive efficiency. 28. Risk assessment for storage and handling of chemicals/solvents

including engineered systems and HAZOP study 29. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 30. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 31. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 32. Socio economic development activities should be in place.














(Viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l)

dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

7. It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (I) should be considered for the preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HPCB) for conducting public hearing/public consultation as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs and addressing and incorporating all concerns raised during public hearing / public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for obtaining prior environmental clearance.

10.3.10 Proposed setting up of a new bulk drug manufacturing unit at Survey

Nos. 32,33,34,46,47,48 and its parts Village-Mukteswara Puram, Mandal Jagayyapet, District Krishna, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Vivin Laboratories Private Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant namely Rightsource

Consultancy, Hyderabad gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The activity regarding manufacturing of bulk drugs are listed at 5(f) of EIA

Notification, 2006. Depending on their location in the industrial estate or outside the industrial estate, the projects are categorized as ?A? or ?B? category. Since the instant project is located outside the Industrial Estate, this is a ?A? category project.

M/s Vivin Laboratories Private Ltd. have proposed to set up a bulk drug manufacturing unit at Village Mukteswarapuram, Mandal Jagagayyapet, in district Krishna in Andhra Pradesh. The land area acquired for the unit is 21 ha, out of which 215386 sq.m of area will be developed for green belt. The total estimated cost of project is Rs. 10.36 crores of which Rs. 1.2 crores has been earmarked for environment protection measures. There are no eco-sensitive areas within 25 km of proposed project.


S. No. Name of the Product Proposed Quantity (MT/Month)

1 AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE 2.0

2 BUPROPION HYDROCHLORIDE 1.5

3 CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE 5.0

4 EFAVIRENZ 4.0

5 GABAPENTIN 4.0

6 LAMIVUDINE 10.0

7 METOMIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE 1.0

8 NEVIRAPINE 1.0

9 PALIPERIDONE 2.0

10 PRASUGREL HYDROCHLORIDE 2.0

11 RIBAVIRIN 1.0

12 SERTRALIN RIBAVIRIN 2.0

13 SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE 3.0

14 STAVUDINE 1.0

15 TOPIRAMATE 3.0

16 ZIDOVUDINE 7.0

TOTAL 52.5

The total power requirement of 1500 HP will be met from A.P TRANSCO and 500 KVA and 300 KVA DG sets during emergency.

The total water requirement of 128.4 m3/day will be met from the ground

water source. About 105.1 m3/day of wastewater will be generated of which 102.6m3/day will be industrial effluent and 2.5 m3/day will be domestic wastewater. The domestic wastewater will be sent to septic tank followed by soak pit. The trade effluent will be sent to Multiple Effect Evaporators (MEE) along with stripping column after neutralization. The condensate from MEE will be used in cooling towers after passing through activated carbon filter and pressure sand filter. The salts from the MEE will be sent to TSDF for safe disposal.

Process emissions will be in the form of HCl, CO2 and H2. HCl will be

scrubbed with the scrubber and dilute HCl will be used for neutralization. CO2 will be routed to atmosphere through vents and H2 will be diffused with flame arrestor. Boiler and DG sets contribute to emissions from plant. Particulate

emissions from the 5TPH and 3TPH coal fired boilers will be controlled by cyclones and emissions shall be dispersed through stack of 32m height. Solvents will be handled in closed containers to reduce losses. Chilled brine circulation will be carried to condensate the solvent vapor for better recovery.

The solid/hazardous waste generation will be in the form of process

waste, inorganic salt and ETP sludge which will be sent to TSDF. The organic waste will be sent to cement industry. The coal ash will be sent to brick manufacturers.

The Committee prescribed the following Terms of reference for

undertaking detailed EIA study:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. A copy of the notification from the concerned authority that

the unit is located in the notified industrial area. 6. Project location and Plant layout. 7. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 8. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment

protection measures. 9. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and

site details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.




13. List of products along with the production capacities. 14. Detailed list of raw material required and source, mode of

storage and transportation. 15. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical

reactions. 16. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers/bag filter. 17. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 18. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 5

km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

19. Ambient air quality modelling for plant.

20. One season data for air, water and Noise monitoring for PM 10, SO2, NOx including VOCs.

21. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions as per CPCB and their control.


23. ?Permission? for the drawl of water from the CGWA/SGWB/APIIC. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged.


25. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste calorific value of hazardous waste and detailed characteristic of the hazardous waste.

26. Details of land fill as per CPCB guide lines 27. Ground water monitoring around the land fill site 28. Risk assessment for storage for chemicals/solvents and

phosgenes. 29. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 30. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 31. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 32. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 33. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in

the CREP guidelines. 34. Location TSDF along with design details. 35. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific

reference to details of air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency, responsibility and time bound implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.












It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board for public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.3.11 Proposed Production of Chlor Alkali at Sr. No. 29, 30 & 32 at Village Talavali, District Raigad, Maharashtra by M/s Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities gave a detailed presentation on the salient features

of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Chlor-Alkali plants with > 300 TPD are listed at S.N. 4(d) under Category ?A? of EIA Notification 2006. The proposed unit is located inside notified industrial area.

M/s Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. have proposed for production of Chlor Alkali at Talavali Village, District- Raigad, Maharashtra. The proposed project will be set

up within the premises of high carbon manufacturing unit. The company is in acquisition of 12 ha of land area. River Patalganga flows at a distance of 2.1 km and Matheran is at a distance of 25 km from the project site. The plant is based on the membrane cell technology.


S. No. Product Capacity (TPD)

1 Caustic soda lye 350

2 Co-products, Chlorine (Gas, liquid chlorine, HCl ,NaOCl )

NaOCland NaC ? Total

315

3 Hydrogen 9

4 Poly-aluminum chloride 200

5 Stable Bleaching Powder 75

6 Chlorinated Paraffin 50

7 Product from the waste (sodium Hypochlorite

15

The total power requirement of 35MW will be met from captive power plant generated from existing unit and MSEDCL. Two nos. of DG sets of 1000 KVA capacity each will be installed for emergency.

The total water requirement of about 2 MLD will be met from the River Patalganga. Domestic effluent (60m3/d) will be treated through biological oxidation/septic tank and treated effluent will be used for green belt. Industrial effluent after treatment will be used for green belt and recycled in the process.

Process emission in the form of chlorine and HCl vapours will be scrubbed

with scrubbers. To control the particulate emissions bag filters will be installed. The unreacted chlorine will be recycled in the plant. The HCl emissions from the polyol aluminium chloride and chlorinated paraffin will scrubbed with water

scrubber and scrubbed effluent along with aluminum oxide will be used for poly-aluminium chloride formulation.

Solid waste will be generated in the form of brine sludge (10TPD) exhausted resin (0.10 TPA), spent carbon (0.10 TPA) , ETP sludge (5TPA) and electorlyser which will be disposed off to common TSDF site. The used oil (30kl/annum) will be sold to the authorized recyclers.

After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) prescribed the following TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. Regulatory framework 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 7. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment

protection measures. 8. Point-wise compliance to the specific and general conditions

stipulated in the environmental clearance for the existing plant.

9. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.




13. List of products (existing and proposed) along with the production capacities.

14. List of raw material required and source. 15. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical

reactions. 16. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers/bag filter. 17. Details water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 18. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 10

km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

19. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 20. Existing emission data for all the sources

21. One season data for air, PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx as per G.S.R. 826 (E) dated 16th November, water and Noise monitoring.

22. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions as per CPCB and their control.





27. Risk assessment and damage control with respect to Cl2 handling and other hazardous chemicals.

28. Safeguards against pressure/temp. excursions; corrosion and leaks

29. Early detection of leak and emergency shut down provisions 30. Fire prevention and fire fighting arrangements 31. Impact of leak and how it is proposed to be minimized ?

DMP to cover specific issues 32. Fugitive emission from spillages & unconverted portion of

the feed and how much can be allowed 33. Work environment monitoring 34. Performance monitoring for ETP / Scrubbers 35. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 36. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 37. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 38. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 39. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in

the CREP guidelines for chemicals manufacturing units. 40. Name and location of the TSDF alongwith membership

should be incorporated. 41. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific



43. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof. .








(vi) While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the proponents and instructions for the consultants issued by MoEF vide O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II (I) dated 4th August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry should also be followed.

(vii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board for public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.3.12 Proposed Chemical Fertilizer Manufacturing Unit located at Greater Rann of Kachchh, Near Hajipir, Taluka Bhuj, District Kachchh, Gujarat by M/s Archean Chemical Industries Private Limited? Reg. TORs


on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. The chemical Fertilizer except single super phosphate manufacturing units are listed at serial no. 5(a) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? category and have to be appraised at central level.

M/s Archean Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. have proposed to manufacture Sulphate of Potash (1,00,000 MT/annum), liquid Bromine (12,500 MT/annum), green bromine (2,500 MT/Annum) and epsomite (81,500 MT/Annum) at Greater Rann Of Kachchh, Near Hajipir, Taluka: Bhuj, District: Kachchh, Gujarat. The total land area acquired for the proposed plant is 253 hectares and the total Investment would be Rs. 630 crores. There are no environmentally sensitive areas and population within 15 km of proposed project location boundary.

The power requirement of 10 MW will be met from PVGCL. The water requirement is 14,467 KLD which will be met from sea water. The domestic waste water (152 KLD) generated will be sent to STP for treatment and then reused for gardening. Industrial waste water (11,640 KLD) will be treated with lime and then sent to solar ponds for evaporation. The solid waste generated from the ETP will be in the form of Gypsum (10,725 TPA) and will be used in making bunds. Used oil (1TPA), discarded bags and containers (1TPA) will be sold to authorized recyclers. Fly ash (3600 TPA) will be sold to brick manufacturers. A 60 m height stack with diameter of 1 m at stack top and ESP is proposed for control of particulate emissions from the boiler. Bromine gas generated from the bottling plant will be scrubbed using 2 stage scrubber and scrubber bleed will be recycled to the process feed. The Committee prescribed the following Terms of Reference for undertaking detailed EIA study:


measures.

8. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. Location of national parks, wildlife sanctuary within 10 km. radius should specifically be mentioned.



11. List of raw material required and source should be included. 12. Manufacturing process details. 13. Storage and transportation of raw materials and products. 14. Design details of ETP, boiler, scrubbers/bag filter/cyclones. 15. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 16. Ambient air quality for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx at 8 locations within the

study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.







23. Design details of the ETP and air pollution control equipments 24. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization. 25. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the

surrounding environment should be assessed and provided. 26. Quantitative Risk assessment for storage handling, loading and

transportation of Bromine and damage distance and control measures needs to be addressed.

27. Trucks carrying Bromine shall have GPS to track their movement and Bromine shall be transported in Isotanks

28. Occupational health Surveillance of the workers needs elaboration. 29. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for rainwater


plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.

32. Name and location of the TSDF along with membership should be incorporated.













(Viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (OCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA/EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/Laboratories including their status of

approvals etc. In this regard circular no F.No.J-l1013/77/2004 - IA ll (l) dated 2nd December, 2009 posted on the Ministry?s website http://www.moef.nic.in may be referred.

The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be communicated the above ?TORs? for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing and incorporating all concerns raised during public hearing/public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MoEF for consideration of prior environmental clearance. 10.3.13 Proposed Pesticide and Dyes Intermediates Unit located at plot no. 6141

and 6143 , GIDC industrial estate , Sachin , Village Sachin, District Surat, Gujarat by M/s Vardhman Organic Private Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant ENPRO Envirotech

Environmental Engineers, Ahmedabad gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Pesticides & Pesticide intermediates manufacturing units are listed at serial no. 5(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? category and have to be appraised at central level. The unit is also manufacturing Dye Intermediates which is listed at Sl. No. 5 (f) of the EIA Notification, 2006.

M/s Vardhman Organics Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for manufacturing of

Pesticide and Dyes Intermediates at GIDC Estate, Sachin Industrial Area in District Surat, Gujarat. It is proposed to remove existing products and to add pesticide @ 30 MT/Month of Pyrazlones / Pyrazoles / Hydrazines, Acid Dyes @ 8 MT/Month and Solvent Dyes @ 5 MT/Month. After expansion, the total production capacity will be 43 MT/Month. The unit is located in notified industrial area of G.I.D.C., Sachin, District Surat in Gujarat. The expansion will be undertaken within the existing industrial premises of 1561.60 m2 area of which green belt will be developed in an area of 74.34m2. The total cost of project will be about Rs. 186.60 lacs. Details of the products to be removed and added are given below:

Products Name and Capacity

Existing Capacity(MT/Month)

Addition/Removal(MT/Month)

Proposed Total (MT/ Month)

i. Pyrazolones / Pyrazoles / Hydrazines

30

Removed Removed

* Or Amino Aryl Sulpfonamide or Aryl Sulphonyl Chloride 20

15

2.

Acid Dyes Nil 8 8

3.

Solvent dyes

nil 5 5

4.

3,5, Dochloro Aniline

Nil 30 30

Total - 43 43

The details of the Acid dyes, solvent dyes and intermediates to be manufacture

Dyes

1 ACID DYES

8 MT/MONTH

Acid Black - 58 Acid Black - 64 Acid Brown - 45 Acid Dark Brown - 48 Acid Orange - 80 Acid Orange - 86 Acid Violet - 78 Acid Yellow - 114 Acid Black - 210 Acid Red - 131 Acid Yellow - 110 Acid Green - 104

2. SOLVENT DYES 5 MT/MONTH

Solvent Black - 27 Solvent Black - 29 Solvent Black - 34 Solvent Blue - 48 Solvent Brown - 43 Solvent Dark Brown- 5R

Proposed Total Dyes

Solvent Fire Red - 119 Solvent Orange - 58 Solvent Orange - 99 Solvent Red - 89 Solvent Red - 122 Solvent Red - 127 Solvent Red - 132 Solvent Yellow - 62 Solvent Yellow - 82 Solvent Yellow - 90

PESTICIDE INTERMIDIATE

3. 3, 5 DICHLORO ANILINE 30 MT/MONTH

It was noted that total water requirement will be about 14927m3/d which

will be met from the Sachin Infra Management Limited. The waste water generated from the Industrial process will be about 11.147 KL/day and about 2.0 m2/day of domestic effluent will be generated. Industrial effluent will be segregated into two streams i.e. concentrated stream (2.659 KL/day) and dilute stream (8.488 KL/day). Concentrated stream after neutralization will be evaporated in multi effect evaporator and dilute stream will be given primary treatment in the Effluent Treatment Plant and treated effluent will be sent to CETP of M/s. Globe Enviro Care Ltd. for further treatment and final disposal. Domestic effluent will be dispersed through septic tank and soak pit.

A new DG set of 125 KVA capacity would be installed in addition to

existing DG set of 125 KVA. LDO consumption shall be 10 Ltr./hr. Existing process stack shall be removed hence there shall be no process emission. After expansion, ETP sludge (23.0 Mt/Month), evaporated residue (1.3 Mt/year) and distillation residue (9.4 Mt/Year) would be sent to TSDF site of M/s. BEIL, Bharuch for suitable treatment. Discarded drums/bags/containers (2000 Nos./Year) and used oil (30 L/Year) would be sent to GPCB approved recycler. Spent acid (166.7 Mt/Month) and thio solution (164.670 MT/Month) would be sold as by product.


1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground

4. A notification to confirm that the unit is located in the notified industrial area.

5. Regulatory framework 6. Project location and Plant layout. 7. Infrastructure facilities, existing and proposed including power


measures. 9. Project site location along with site map of 5 km area and site

details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.

10. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10km radius. Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 10km radius of the project.




14. List of raw material required and source. 15. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions. 16. Design details of ETP & boiler. 17. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 18. Ambient air quality data for one season other than monsoon

regarding PM10, SO2, NOx and VOC at 4 locations within the study area of 10km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

19. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 20. One season data other than monsoon for water and Noise

monitoring. 21. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site

and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features.

22. ?Permission? for the drawl of water from the CGWA/SGWB/GIDC. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged.

23. Ground water monitoring at 6 locations should be carried out. 24. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage,

utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste.

25. Risk assessment for storage and handling of chemicals/solvents. 26. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 27. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area

28. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 29. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 30. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific













It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA

Notification, 2006. The final EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. Public hearing is not required as the unit is located in the notified industrial area.

10.3.14 Proposed manufacturing of P.F. Resin & M.F. Resin & Laminated Sheets at Survey No. 115, Village Daran, Taluka Sanand, Bavla Sanand Road, District Ahmedabad in Gujarat by M/s Corus Décor Private Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant T.R. Associates gave a

detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The activity regarding manufacturing of Synthetic Organic chemicals is

listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? or ?B? category depending upon their location within or outside the notified industrial area. This is a ?A? category project as it is located outside the notified industrial area.

M/s Corus Decor Pvt. Ltd. have proposed to manufacture Phenol Formaldehyde (P.F) Resin (185 MTPM), Melamine Formaldehyde (M.F) Resin (36 MTPM) & Laminated sheets (11,00,000 nos./annum) at Village: Daran, Taluka:Sanand, Bavla-Sanand Road, Ahmedabad. There are no environmentally sensitive areas within 15 km of proposed project location. The company as acquired total land area of 12004.37 m2 of which 3960 m2 has been earmarked for green belt development. Total cost of the project is Rs.3.43 crores.

About 425 HP of power would be required. A total quantity of 430 MT/month of Lignite & Agro waste would be used as fuel. DG set would be used only as a back up for power failure with a fuel consumption of 65 litre/hr. HSD.

The total water requirement is 17.2m3/d which will be catered through borewell. About 2 m3/d of domestic effluent will be generated which will be dispersed through septic tank. The industrial effluent (9.7m3/d) will be treated in effluent treatment plant and treated effluent will be evaporated in the evaporator to achieve zero discharge. To control the particulate emissions from the boilers, multi-cyclone dust collector will be installed and emissions will be dispersed through stack of adequate height as per CPCB /State Pollution Control Board standards.

The solid /hazardous waste will be generated in the form of ETP waste

(3.5 MTPA) which will be disposed to TSDF site. The resin waste (10 MTPA) will be disposed of to approved incineration facility. The used oil (45 lit/annum) will be sold to registered recyclers with CPCB. The discarded plastic liners (7MTPA) and discarded plastic bags (90kg/annum) will be sold to registered vendors.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed

EIA study:

1. Present land use based on satellite imagery. 2. Justification of the project 3. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative


km radius of the project. 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 7. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment protection

measures. 8. Water source and utilization including existing and proposed water

balance 9. List of raw material required and source. 10. Manufacturing process details. 11. Details water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 12. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 5 km., aerial


13. Ambient air quality modeling for Power plant. 14. One season emission data for existing plant. 15. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions as

per CPCB guidelines from the power plant. Fugitive emissions and their control.


17. ?Permission? for the drawl of water from the concerned Department. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged.

18. Ground water monitoring minimum at 6 locations and also near solid waste dump zone should be carried out. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area and ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic).

19. Solid waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste and fly ash.

20. Risk assessment and damage control. 21. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 22. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 23. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 24. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 20. Membership of TSDF and hazardous waste management plan.



25. Tabular chart giving the point-wise response to the public hearing. 26. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order

passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.










Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Gujarat Pollution Control Board for public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.3.15 Proposed Manufacturing of P.F. Resin & M.F. Resin & Laminated Sheets at Dedhal Adroda Road, Bavla, District Ahmedabad in Gujarat by M/s Motif Décor Private Limited? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant T.R. Associates gave a

detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.


listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? or ?B? category depending upon their location within or outside the notified industrial area. This is a ?A? category project as it is located outside the notified industrial area.

M/s Motif Decor Pvt. Ltd. have proposed to manufacture Phenol Formaldehyde Resin (210MTPM), Melamin Resin (41MTPM) & Laminate sheets (4100 nos./day) at Survey No. 187, Dhedhal Adhroda Road, Bavla, Ahmedabad. The resin manufactured will be used for the laminate sheets as raw material. The total plant area is 7587.89 Sq.m of which 2505 m2 will be developed as green belt. There are no environmentally sensitive areas within 15 km distance of proposed project location.

About 425 HP of power would be required. A total quantity of 430 MT/month of Lignite & Agro waste would be used as fuel. DG set would be installed used only as a back up for power failure with a fuel consumption of 65 litre/hr. HSD.

The total water requirement is 19.3 KLD which will be catered through borewell. A about 2 m3/d of domestic effluent will be generated which will be dispersed through septic tank. The industrial effluent (1.8m3/d) will be treated in effluent treatment plant and treated effluent will be evaporated in the evaporator to achieve zero discharge. To control the particulate emissions from the boilers, multi-cyclone dust collector will be installed and emissions will be dispersed through stack of adequate height as per CPCB /State Pollution Control Board standards.

The solid /hazardous waste will be generated in the form of ETP waste

(4MTPA) which will be disposed to TSDF site. The resin waste (11MTPA) will be disposed of to approved incineration facility. The used oil (50 lit/annum) will be sold to registered recyclers with CPCB. The discarded plastic liners (8MTPA) and discarded plastic bags (100kg/annum) will be sold to registered vendors.

The Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed

EIA study:

1. Present land use based on satellite imagery. 2. Justification of the project 3. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative


km radius of the project. 5. Project location and Plant layout. 6. Infrastructure facilities including power sources. 7. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment protection

measures. 8. Water source and utilization including existing and proposed water

balance 9. List of raw material required and source. 10. Manufacturing process details. 11. Details water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 12. Ambient air quality at 6 locations within the study area of 5 km., aerial


13. Ambient air quality modeling for Power plant. 14. One season emission data for existing plant. 15. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions as

per CPCB guidelines from the power plant. Fugitive emissions and their control.


17. ?Permission? for the drawl of water from the concerned Department. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged.

18. Ground water monitoring minimum at 6 locations and also near solid waste dump zone should be carried out. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area and ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic).

19. Solid waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste and fly ash.

20. Risk assessment and damage control. 21. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 22. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 23. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 24. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 21. Membership of TSDF and hazardous waste management plan.



29. Tabular chart giving the point-wise response to the public hearing. 30. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order

passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.










Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Gujarat Pollution Control Board for public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

10.3.16 Proposed Manufacturing of Organic / Inorganic & Speciality Chemical at

Jhagadia, District Bharuch in Gujarat by M/s Panoli Intermediates (India) Pvt. Limited (Unit ?VI) ? Reg. TORs


on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.


listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and categorized under ?A? or ?B? category depending upon their location within or outside the notified industrial area. This is a ?B? category project as it is located within the notified industrial area, however appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee at the Centre, since the unit is located within 10km distance of the critically polluted area, proposal has been appraised as per the general condition of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006.

M/s Panoli Intermediates (India) Pvt. Ltd. have proposed to manufacture Organic / Inorganic & Speciality Chemical at GIDC, Jhagadia, District Bharuch, Gujarat. The total land available with the unit is 20,772.65 sq.m, of which 6500 m2 has been earmarked for green belt development. The cost of expansion project is Rs. 65crores.

Details of the products to be manufactured are given below:

Sr. No. Name of the Product Capacity, MT/Month

Product Required Environmental Clearance

1 Chlorinated Paraffin Wax 4000

2 Benzyl Sulphonyl Chloride (BSC) 1500

3 Amino Hydrocarbon -Toluidine & DCA (Hydrogenation) 3000

4 ONCB, PNCB, MNCB (Nitration) 5000

5 Dimethyl Sulfate (DMS) 3000

6 Dimethyl Aniline (DMA) 1500

7 o- Nitro Aniline, p- Nitro Aniline 3000

8 Diethyl Sulfate 1500

9 3,3 DCB HCl 1000

10 Para Amino Phenol 1000

11 MCB, ODCB, PDCB 5000

By-Product

1 Dimethyl Sulphone 841

Sr. No. Name of the Product Capacity, MT/Month

Product that does not require Environmental Clearance

1 Equivalent Sulphuric Acid as

1A Sulphuric Acid (98%) 15000

1B Oleum (23% & 65%) 3000

1C Liquid SO3 7500

2 Chloro Sulphonic Acid 5000

3 Thionyle Chloride 3000

4 Calcium Chloride 4000

5 Di Calcium Phosphate 1500

By-Product

1 Dilute Hydrochloric Acid 7320

2 Dilute Sulphuric Acid 958.5

Power requirement of 1500 KVA will be sourced from Dakshin Gujarat Viz Company and steam turbine of 4 MW from Sulphuric Acid plant. Water requirement of 1256m3/d will be met from the GIDC Jhagadia. About 558.2m3/d of effluent will be generated which after primary, secondary and tertiary treatment and conforming to the prescribed standards will be sent through GIDC pipeline of M/s Bharuch Eco Aqua Infrastructure Limited for further

disposal

Process emissions in the form of SO2, acid mist, HCl , Cl2 will be scrubbed with alkali scrubber and emissions conform to the prescribed standards. The boiler will be fired on natural gas and emissions will be dispersed through stack of height as per CPCB/State Pollution Control Board standards. The solid /hazardous waste will be generated in the form of Calcium chloride (120.7MT/d) will be sold to authorized recyclers. The waste bags (1530 nos./m) and waste drums (2750 nos./m) will be provided to the GPCB approved recyclers. The spent oil (100 lit/month)

will be sold to the approved recyclers. The ETP sludge (30MTPM) will be disposed of in the secured landfill facility. The Committee prescribed the following Terms of Reference for undertaking detailed EIA study:

1. Executive summary of the project 2. Justification of the project. 3. Promoters and their back ground 4. A notification to confirm that the unit is located in the notified

industrial area. 5. Regulatory framework 6. Project location and Plant layout. 7. Infrastructure facilities, existing and proposed including

power sources. 8. Total cost of the project along with cost for environment

protection measures. 9. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and

site details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.




13. List of products along with the production capacities. 14. List of raw material required and source. 15. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical

reactions. 16. Design details of ETP & boiler. 17. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 18. Ambient air quality data for one season other than monsoon

regarding PM10, SO2, NOx, HCl and VOC at 4 locations within the study area of 5km., aerial coverage from project site. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

19. Ambient air quality modelling for plant. 20. One season data other than monsoon for water and Noise

monitoring. 21. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project

site and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features.

22. ?Permission? for the drawl of water from the GIDC. Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged.

23. Ground water monitoring at 6 locations should be carried out.


25. Risk assessment for storage and handling of chemicals/solvents.

26. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated. 27. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area 28. Scheme for rainwater harvesting. 29. Socio economic development activities should be in place. 30. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific













It was decided that ?TORs? prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the ?Generic Structure of EIA? given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The final EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. Public hearing is not required as the unit is located in the notified industrial area.

10.3.17 Proposed Manufacturing of Zinc Sulphate at Village- Dumral, Tehsil Nadiad, District Kheda in Gujarat by M/s Gluco Chem Industries ? Reg. TORs

The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP.

The proposal regarding manufacturing of chemicals viz Zinc Sulphate (2.5

MTPM), Gluconic acid (2MTPM), Ferrous Gluconate (15MTPM), Zinc Gluconate (5 MTPM), Magnesium Gluconate ( 1 MTPM), Manganese Gluconate (0.5MTPM), Copper Gluconate (0.5MTPM), Ferric Ammonium citrate (10MTPM) , Ferrous Glycine Sulphate (1 MTPM), Calcium Glubionate (1 MTPM), Calcium Ferrous citrate (1MTPM) , Ferrous Ascorbate (2 MTPM) and Calcium citrate Malate (2 MTPM) at Village- Dumral, Tehsil Nadiad, District Kheda in Gujarat by M/s Gluco Chem Industries was placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee to prescribe the Terms of Reference for undertaking detailed EIA study.

The activity regarding manufacturing of Synthetic organic chemicals is

listed at 5(f) of EIA Notification, 2006. The company is already manufacturing zinc sulphate which is an inorganic

chemical. The Committee noted that all the products except Gluconic acid are the inorganic chemicals. The proposal was discussed in detail. During the discussion, the proponent informed the Committee that Gluconic acid will not be manufactured and it will be purchased from the market.

The Committee noted that since the proponent proposed to manufacture

inorganic chemical which are not listed in the provisions of the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. Therefore, the Committee decided that the proposal does not attract the provisions of the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. The proponent may give the commitment to the Ministry that the gluconic acid which is an organic will not be manufactured. The proponent have given commitment in this regard. However, it was decided the proponent may obtain NOC under the Air and Water Acts and authorization under the Hazardous Waste(Management , Handling and Trans boundary Movement ) Rules, 2008 as may be applicable to this case.

The meeting ended with a Vote of Thanks to the Chair.

It was decided that next meeting will be held on 28th May, 2010.

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

******

Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) : 1. Shri Mahesh B Lal Chairman P 2. Shri. R K Garg Vice -Chairman P 3 Dr. Prem Shankar Dubey Member P

5. Dr. S. D. Attri Member P 6. Shri Niranjan Raghunath

Raje Member P

7. Shri Rajat Roy Choudhary Member P

8. Shri Swapan Kumar Hazra Member P 9. Dr. B Sengupta Member P MOEF Officials :

(i) Dr. (Mrs.) P.L.

Ahujarai Member Secretary & Director (Expert Appraisal Committee-2(Industry)

P

(ii) Dr.P.B. Rastogi Member Secretary & Director (Expert Appraisal Committee-1(Industry)

P

(iii) Shri Ramesh Motipally

Deputy Director

P

(iv) Mr. P.R. Sakhare Research Officer

P

cpcb - 10th meeting - experts appraisal committee - 29-30 april, 2010

Documents