course digitisations at lincoln: solving real problems with talis aspire digitised content (open...
DESCRIPTION
Ian Snowley (Library Director, Lincoln University) - An exiting discussion on how Talis Aspire Digitised Content aligned to Lincoln's strategic drivers to tackle real problems for librarians, academics and students alike.TRANSCRIPT
Course digitisations at Lincoln: Solving real problems with Talis Aspire Digitised
Content
Ian Snowley University Librarian
Overview• Background
– University of Lincoln– Library Strategy– Digitisation – issues
• TADC– Why– How– Immediate Benefits
• Future Development• Questions
University of Lincoln• Some Numbers
• Growth - International and Research
• Ambitious
• Focus on Student Experience and Engagement (Student as Producer)
Library Strategy• Focus on Learning Development;
Research Support and Improving student experience
• IT Strategy 2012 – Discovery, Aspire, Update to LMS (Horizon)
• Aspire reading Lists – steady increase in take-up, centrally managed approach
• Future plans – implement Library Services Platform (14/15)
Digitisation Issues• Necessary to meet academic needs (and
keep within budgets)
• Very time intensive (esp. record keeping)
• Uncontrolled
• High risk [CLA compliance]!
Why TADC• Complete solution – link to CLA & Talis Aspire• Cost-effective
– We calculated staff costs of c£23k pa for existing approach
– Meaning TADC results in a net saving year on year– Even without storage costs etc
• Opportunity to implement before academic year (13/14)
• Cloud based meaning easier/quicker implementation
How TADC• Opportunity to bid for extra funds
– Not successful!– But so important we re-purposed part of existing
budget
• Implemented Summer ‘13• Good support from Talis• Had hoped to ‘convert’ previous digitisations
– But not possible in time– Electronic Library Services team stepped in to convert
c1,200 items (c700 done/c500 ongoing)
Immediate Benefits• Supports development of Reading Lists
= better reading lists
• CLA spreadsheet being compiled in real-time (checkable = audit trail)
• Compliance & Control – only source for digitisations
• Real-time checking of exclusions etc• Time saved (ss/better workflow/simpler process)• Analytics – views/downloads/prints
Future Development• Currently Academic staff don’t access
TADC – because we’re using Aspire as the ‘front end’
• So need to open up TADC to academic staff to unlock full work-flow benefits
• Further work to enhance reporting
• Increase take-up of Aspire Reading Lists
Questions?