côte d’ivoire developing the national workplan unep/uccee capacity development for the clean...
TRANSCRIPT
Côte d’IvoireDeveloping the National Workplan
UNEP/UCCEE Capacity Development forthe Clean Development Mechanism
March 2003, Nairobi
Presentation Outline
Introduction Overview of Project Process Project Achievements Project Prospects Conclusion
Rep. of Côte d’Ivoire
Independence, 1960 322,662 sq. km= 4/3 Uganda= 2/5 Mozambq
Pop. : 16 millions= 3/5 Uganda= 4/5 Mozmbq
GDP = $ 9,4 billions GDP per capita = $ 590
Climate Change Background
UNFCCC Ratified, 1994 Expected Kyoto ratification, 2003 Initial Nat. Communication, 2000 Net GHG sink (-17 901 Gg CO2) Further sequestration options: Use of Renewables, Energy Efficiency in Power generation, Industry, Agro, & Transports
Vulnerability Points
Coast line Water resources Forests Livelihood (Food, health, housing)
Prior CC related Projects
Management of East Forests (GTZ/ since 80’)
Savannah Interface Reforestation (AfDB, 84-86)
Forest Sector Projects: reforestation (WB/Sodefor, 90’)
Energy Sector Management (WB, 88-93)
Prior CC related Projects
Country GHG Studies (USAID, 94)
Energy Efficiency in Buildings (PNUD/GEF, 96-01)
National Communication (UNEP/GEF, 98-)
Institutional FrameworkMINISTRY of
ENVIRONMENT
SIIC
Dir
EnvDir
P N
ANDE
SAAIJSP
BEIECIAPOL
AGENCIES UNITS I G E
PCGAP
GEF Op. FP UNFCCC FP
Institutional FrameworkMINISTRY of ENERGY
and MINING
SOPIE ANARE
CIE
Dir. HYDROCARBONS
AZITO ENERGIECIPREL
OEI FOXTROT CNR
SOGEPE
Dir MINING & GEOLOGY
Dir. ENERGY
Institutional FrameworkMINISTRY of
TRANSPORTATION
OCEANS and RIVERS
AGETU SONATTAGEROUTE
Private sectorSICTA
AIR TRAVEL
Institutional Framework
Dir Gen WATERS and FORESTS
DEVELOPMENTAGRO
RESEARCH
ANADER SODEFOR CNRA UNCI
MINISTRY of WATERS and FORESTS
Process OverviewPNUE
UCCEERg Ctr Exc
ENDA
Technical Ministries
P. Nat Inst BNETD
Nat P. Host SAAIJSP
Private Sector
National Institutions
ONG
Regional WORKSHOP
National WORKPLAN
Capacity Development
DUTCH Govt
National WORKSHOP
Draft WORKPLAN
Project Activities
Introductory Field mission by UCCEE and ENDA, July 02 National Awareness workshop, October 02 Institutional interviews by BNETD, Dec. 02 - Fev. 03 Project developers’ meeting, Dec. 17 National Workplan draft
Introductory Mission
UCCEE and ENDA: 21-25 July 02 Introduction to Nat. stakeholders National Project Host: SAAIJSP Project National Institution: BNETD Good potential for CDM related project activitiesLimited understanding of CDM issues
Awareness Workshop
Awareness Workshop, Abidjan, 9 Oct. 02: project introduction to all stakeholders UCCEE, ENDA and national stakeholders: 57 participants 8 Gov entities (19 pers.), 8 Nat inst (16), 11 NGO (13), 4 Private sect (4), 4 UN (5)
Participants expressed project interest and made CC relevant recommendations: - Adjust the institutional framework to climate change response requirements; - Encourage technical and
policy dialogue between stakeholders.
Institutional Interviews
UN / MAE 09 Dec
BNETD 06 Dec
SAAIJSP 02 Jan
CEPICI 10 Dec
GEF/SGP 12 Dec
BSEE 09 Dec
P. Nat Inst BNETD
BEIE 10 Dec
ANDE 13 Fev
Institutional Capacity Needs1) Observed: difficulties for interviewee
determination of own capacity needs2) Needed: Further familiarization with
CC and CDM concepts3) Needed: GHG reduction quantity
determination4) Needed: Validation / Verification
procedure information / training5) Needed: Familiarization with CDM
market operation (investors)
Project Developers’ meeting
Consultation meeting, Bnetd, 17 Dec. 02: project introduction to potential developers Technical Ministries, NGO, Private sector: 14 participants, 6 entities Participants expressed project interest and emphasized capacity needs
Project Dev. capacity Needs
1) Observed: difficulties for interviewee determination of own capacity needs
2) Needed: Basic conventional/Cdm project discrimination tools
3) Needed: Target-company information4) Needed: Clean technology information5) Needed: Project development guide6) Needed: Baseline determination7) Needed: Monitoring GHG reduction
Draft National Workplan
Process Mapping for DNA determination Elaboration on specific DNA role Identification of basic set-up models Identification of relevant stakeholders Capacity Assessment Plan capacity development
Specific DNA Role R1- facilitate Kyoto protocol ratification R2- attract international CDM investments R3- develop national CDM communication and marketing R4- provide guidance to project developers R5- determine national approval criteria R6- coordinate project validation, monitoring and verification activities R7- satisfy EB reporting requirements regarding national approval, registration, monitoring and certification; R8- organize local record-keeping.
3 Basic set-up models
Model 1/ DNA = Government Department : one or more govt dpts
Model 2/ DNA = National Committee: Govt + NGO + Private
Model 3/ DNA = Outsourced: non govt (NGO, Private)
Preferred set-up model Model 2/ DNA = National Committee RCI: institutional framework needs adjusting to climate change response requirements (Awareness Workshop) Technical and policy dialogue between stakeholders needs to be encouraged (Awareness Workshop) CDM as recent and unfamiliar market: (Initial UCCEE Abidjan Mission). Recommended institution of a technical committee in charge of project selection (Awareness Workshop)
Stakeholder IdentificationR1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
Stakeholders ANDE
BEIE
BNETD
BSEE
CEPICI
SAAIJSP
DNA Requirementsfacilitate Kyoto protocol ratification
attract and facilitate international (CDM) investments
provide basic guidance to (CDM) project developers
organize local record-keeping
develop national (CDM) communication and marketing
determine the national criteria for (CDM) project approval
coordinate project validation, monitoring and verification activities
satisfy EB reporting requirements regarding national approval, registration, monitoring and certification
Prospects
National Discussion of current draft Additions, adjustments and corrections Capacity development: Plan + Budget Validation at National workshop Prompt actual DNA creation can be expected through continuing efficient institutional support
CONCLUSION
Key elements of workplan development are in place Holding national workshop is within weeks The present workshop will be instrumental in workplan finalization and national workshop organization Smooth project progress across all participating SSA countries anticipated