Ministry of theAttorney General

Legal Services BranchMinistry of GovernmentServices

Ferguson Block77 Wellesley Street West, 6th FloorToronto ON M7A 1N3

Ministere duProcureur general

Direction des services juridiquesMinistere des Services

gouvernementaux

Edifice Ferguson77, rue Wellesley Ouest, 6" etageToronto ON M7A 1N3

® Ontario

Telephone:Fax:

416 325-9393416 325-6383

Telephone:Telecopieur:

416 325-9393416 325-6383

By Regular Mail

November 16, 2009

Donald Mark Westover-----r-\~.R~.#4~ .------ --

Kemble, ON NOH 1SO

Dear Donald Mark Westover:

Re: Your correspondence

I am a lawyer with the Ministry of Government Services. I have been asked by theOffice of the Lieutenant Governor for the Province of Ontario to review certaincorrespondence and documents that you sent to the Honourable David OnleySeptember 10, 2009.

The correspondence that has been sent by you and regarding you to the LieutenantGovernor is incomprehensible and appears to have no basis in Canadian law. I amunaware of what personal financial or other legal obligations you may have, but thecorrespondence that has been sent by and about you, and the actions described in thatcorrespondence, do not relieve you of any such obligations that you may have.

Neither the Lieutenant Governor nor any agent of the Government of Ontario will betaking any further action in response to the correspondence that has been sent to theLieutenant Governor regarding this or related matters. .

Copy to: The Office of the Lieutenant Governor for the Province of Ontario theHonourable David C. Onley

:Donald- Mark: Westover:

c/o RRl Kemble, Ontario

The Honourable David Charles OnleyOffice of the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario

Room 131, Legislative BuildingQueen's Park

Toronto, ON M7A lAl

Dear Mr. Onley,

January 15, 2010

I am in receipt of the response you commissioned the Ministry of the Attorney General to send to me on

November 16, 2009 with respect to my documents mailed on September 10, 2009.

I have included a copy of it with this letter. I find it incomprehensible that the lawyers employed by the

Ministry of the Attorney General would find my documents "incomprehensible". To further state that

said documents have no basis in Canadian law makes me question if the lawyers are acquainted with

Canadian law. I will remind you that as a government agent/official you are bound by the Criminal Code

of Canada and the Canadian Constitution and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This, again,

is covered in my Claim of Right and Notice of Understanding and Intent. The government is in the

service industry and is not the ruling class. The people are the sovereigns. You are duty bound by oath

to the Queen and Defender of the Faith to protect me and my interests. As such, you and your

Minister's office will tend to the appropriate paperwork to give me safe and unmolested passage and

will defend my rights and freedoms, inalienable or claimed. I have stated that I am under no contract

and so no obligation to obey rules, statutes or laws made by defacto government. Please check the

Criminal Code for verification. I have used a number of commonalities which Canada and I may share to

illustrate my intentions and reasons and to show that even with your rules with which you govern

yourself, I have lawful standing. If your lawyers are unaware of what "termination of contract" and"offer of contract" and "acceptance of contract" look like it is not me that is to blame. I have made

every effort to be clear and concise, and at considerable cost and time. I have had my documents

witnessed and read and critiqued by a number of people. They did not find my documents

"incomprehensible". They did not find and agree that my documents "had no basis in Canadian law". Itis time for those in the service industry to perform the tasks that they were commissioned to act upon.

Canada and I have a new arrangement and not the one of old in which the disobedient servant

misrepresents and abuses its constituents. If Canada has a representative government, what constitutes

representation? You do not represent me. You have been served with a termination of the old contract

and are in receipt of the new contract. I will represent and so govern myself. I offer violence to no manand am governed by conscience and God Almighty. You have accepted my offer as chiefly outlined in

my fee schedule. I am currently satisfied with this arrangement. You hold the office of "public servant",while I, from time to time, hold the position of "the public". I am pleased to accept your services on illY

terms alone. I will direct these services; they will not be assumed from my control.

Perhaps this example will illustrate to VK Silver the nature of my documents and illuminate with

understanding the "incomprehensible":

Coca Cola is a corporation with rules and regulations. All people who are employed by Coca Cola are

bound to its rules and codes by contract. Yet the rules are only binding to those in contract with Coca

Cola. Anyone outside of contract is free to govern themselves as they see fit. Even other corporationsare free to do as they decide. Pepsi, for example, is not bound by Coke's codes. Coke has no right to

impose its rules on any other party who does not wish to enter into contract with it.

Coca Cola is like the Corporation of Canada, Ontario, all incorporated towns and cities and organizations.

I am not a member of the bar, nor do I belong to any organization that would exert force or power over

its constituents or members. I am a Man and not a beast to be controlled and farmed by those whowould fashion themselves as self-appointed global caretakers. Ones such as these suppose they know

best how to handle my affairs: they do not. They are FIRED of any position of governance over me. The

function of law in a free society is to protect each other's rights, freedoms, liberties and properties from

those who would not love their brothers as themselves. Government agencies, corporations, officials

and other bloodless entities have left their proper station of protecting the people for abuse, power and

plunder. This is far from what our forefathers had intended for us. Under the self-governing system thepeople have the power; not the government. Government derives its power from the people to serve

the people and not to their detriment. This differs from the old system in that Man was not designed to

serve an earthly king by nature; corporations and law were by nature, however, designed to serve Man.

If we are not free men, we are slaves. If we are slaves and you or your organization are our masters, sayas much and show how this came to be so that I may serve in peace. If you do not respond withinformation confirming this power then you are agreeing that we are free men. If we are free men, then

your ministry must derive its power from the people. This power is borrowed by agreement and so free

men yield some of their liberties so that your government may operate. In this fashion, free men

subordinate themselves by contract to legal fictions. Thus, all law is contract law. Even in the Old

Testament when the Almighty became a God to Israel, it was under contract. Israel agreed to God'sterms.

The Constitution Acts (Schedule B, Part 1) of your government declares that it recognizes the Supremacyof God and the rule of law and that Canada was founded on this.

As God created Man first and Law secondly it follows that the order of authority is as such:1. God

2. Man

3. Family4. Rule of Law

5. Community6. Corporations

The corporation of Canada and all its subsidiaries are pulling up the rear. You will need to show me how

if God created all men equal that another man (or more stunning still, a fiction like a corporation) gainedjurisdiction and power over me. As I refuse to contract with any party which would remove my liberty

from my power I must assume that your office has received some form of written permission from the

Almighty Himself. I should like to see that. Please.

Until then, any Act of Parliament which violates my freedoms and liberties is of no effect and void.

The Constitution Acts Section 32 (1)(a-b) limits the Acts to Parliament and government of Canada.

Govern yourself accordingly. The rights of the individual are protected from majority rule. The rights of

the collective can never be greater than the rights of the individual, however else we may be commonlytaught. I am sure the banks will stand behind me on that. Even you would cringe at the idea of having

your assets, wealth or life voted from your possession.

This self-governing hierarchy makes me the monarch and your ministry the servant. Rogue, obstructive

corporations who have left their estate must return to their designed function or have their power

revoked. I am doing such a thing and will not reinstate power until a time in which I have regained faith

in its intentions and purpose.

It is easy for you to respond with remarks like {{this ministry does not recognize your documents" or

other such things. I don't know if this means anything to me. You have an obligation to me under our

new arrangement of September 10, 2009; this much is sure. Fear not. I will not abuse your office and

our new relationship.

I will send you documents from time to time for deregistration or other such concerns as I do not wish

to confuse your system or your agents. I will expect you to care for these tasks at your end as I have atmine.

I look forward to a peaceful, rewarding relationship for us both in which I live according to conscience

and God Almighty and the love of my fellow man, while you protect my rights and freedoms as per youroffice's design and your oath to the Queen.

Our correspondence will be posted in the public at www.issuu.com[golden.don for your convenience.

I will be taking no further action in response to your correspondence as I have had my terms accepted

by all involved. Please review my documents for your complete awareness and understanding.