correlations in gene expression – part i · igmt1 at1g21100 igmt2 at1g21120 at1g21130 at1g76790...
TRANSCRIPT
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 Microarrays (N = 1436)
Correlations in Gene Expression – Part I
>0.6>0.5>0.4
>0.9
>0.7>0.8
Supplemental Figure 1. Correlations in gene expression – Part I.
Correlations in the expression between CYP81F and O-MT genes were calculated based on 1436 Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 microarray experiments, available from TAIR (www.arabidopsis.org).Shown are correlations for CYP81F1, 2, 3, and 4, confirmed O-MT genes IGMT1 and IGMT2, and putative indole glucosinolate O-methyltransferase genes At1g21110, At1g21130 and At1g76790. All correlations (P < 0.00001) remain significant after Bonferroni correction. Colour codes indicate the strength of the correlation coefficient r.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
1
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
IGMT1At1g21100
IGMT2At1g21120
At1g21130
At1g76790
CYP81F3At4g37400
CYP81F4At4g37410
CYP81F1At4g37430
CYP81F2At5g57220
At1g21110
Abiotic Stress (N = 149) Pathogens (N = 36)
Development (N = 79) Hormones (N = 115)
>0.6>0.5>0.4
>0.9
>0.7>0.8
Correlations in Gene Expression – Part II
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
2
Supplemental Figure 2. Correlations in gene expression – Part II.
Correlations in CYP81F and O-MT gene expressions were calculated for microarray experiments focusing on plant organs at different developmental stages (N = 79), after hormone treatments (N =115), exposure to abiotic stress (N = 149) or to pathogens (N = 36). Information regarding experimental details is available from AtGenExpress (www.weigelworld.org/resources/microarray/AtGenExpress/).Colour codes indicate the strength of the correlation coefficient r. All correlations are significant after Bonferroni correction, except for correlations with r < 0.5 in the data set entitled ‘Pathogens’. The dashed line in ‘Abiotic Stress’ indicates a negative correlation.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
3
0
100
200 IGMT1(At1g21100)
0
15
30 IGMT2At1g21120
0
500
1000 At1g76790
0
250
500 At1g21130
0
50
100
150CYP81F2
(At5g57220)
0
500
1000
1500
CYP81F1(At4g37430)
0
50
100
150CYP81F3
(At4g37400)
1 Dry seed
2 Imbibed seed, 24 h
3 1st Node
4 Flower Stage 12, Stamens
8 Entire Rosette AfterTransition To Flowering
5 Cauline Leaf
7 Root
6 Cotyledon
9 Flower Stage 9
10 Flower Stage 10/11
11 Flower Stage 12
12 Flower Stage 15
13 Flower Stage 12, Carpels
14 Flower Stage 12, Petals
15 Flower Stage 12, Sepals
16 Flower Stage 15, Carpels
17 Flower Stage 15, Petals
18 Flower Stage 15, Sepals
19 Flower Stage 15, Stamen
20 Flowers Stage 15, Pedicels
21 Leaf 1 + 2
22 Leaf 7, Petiole
23 Leaf 7, Distal Half
24 Leaf 7, Proximal Half
25 Hypocotyl
26 Root
27 Rosette Leaf 2
28 Rosette Leaf 4
29 Rosette Leaf 6
30 Rosette Leaf 8
31 Rosette Leaf 10
32 Rosette Leaf 12
33 Senescing Leaf
34 Shoot Apex, Inflorescence
35 Shoot Apex, Transition
36 Shoot Apex, Vegetative
37 Stem, 2nd Internode
38 Mature Pollen
39 Seeds Stage 3 w/ Siliques
40 Seeds Stage 4 w/ Siliques
41 Seeds Stage 5 w/ Siliques
42 Seeds Stage 6 w/o Siliques
43 Seeds Stage 7 w/o Siliques
44 Seeds Stage 8 w/o Siliques
45 Seeds Stage 9 w/o Siliques
46 Seeds Stage 10 w/o Siliques
47 Vegetative Rosette
1 2 4 7 9 11 14 16 18 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 44433 5 6 8 10 1213 20 22 24 26 28 30 3215 17 19 45 46 47
0
1000
2000 CYP81F4(At4g37410)
0
25
50 At1g21110
Abso
lute
Exp
ress
ion
Valu
e
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
4
Supplemental Figure 3. In silico analysis of CYP81F and O-MT gene expression patterns.
The Arabidopsis eFP-Browser (http://bar.utoronto.ca) was used to visualize the expression of CYP81F and O-MT genes in different tissues during plant development (Winter et al., 2007). Panels show absolute expression values obtained from Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 microarrays for CYP81F1, 2, 3, and 4, for confirmed O-MT genes IGMT1 and IGMT2, and for putative indole glucosinolate O-methyltransferase genes At1g21110, At1g21130 and At1g76790 in different organs during various stages of development. These organs/developmental stages are numbered from 1– 47, and are listed on the left of the panels. The CYP81F1 antisense gene, At4g37432, is not represented on the ATH1 microarrays and could thus not be evaluated.
CYP81F1 is expressed throughout all developmental stages and tissues but expression is particularly strong in sepals. CYP81F2 is highly expressed in imbibed seeds, and in all vegetative tissues of seedlings and mature plants. However, expression in roots is less pronounced than in leaves. No or little expression is visible in flowers and during most stages of seed development. CYP81F3 is expressed throughout all developmental stages and tissues, most strongly in roots. CYP81F4 has very high expression in the roots of seedlings, and in the roots and the hypocotyl of mature plants, but is also expressed in leaves although at a comparatively low level.
Four of the O-MT genes, IGMT1, At1g21110, IGMT2, and At1g21130, have very similar expression patterns. They are expressed in seedlings, during all leaf stages and in the hypocotyl but show little expression in flowers or during seed development. IGMT1, At1g21110 and IGMT2 but not At1g21130 are also strongly expressed in roots. Interestingly, none of these four genes has pronounced expression in imbibed seeds where CYP81F2 is strongly expressed. At1g76790 is strongly expressed during this developmental stage, but also in the roots of seedlings and of older plants, and in the hypocotyl.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
5
0
8
4x108
0
8
4x108
8
4x108
I3M
0
4
2x107 4OH-I3M standard
8
0
4x108
0
CYP81F1
4OH-I3M
8
4x108
CYP81F3
0
8
4x108
CYP81F4
6 8time [min]
CYP81F2
Negative control
I3M biosynthesis
D
E
F
G
C
A
B369.1
391.1
300 400 500
6
8
2
0
4
x108
384.9
464.9
406.9
300 400 500
34
10
2
x107
369.1
469.2
391.1
300 400 500
6
2
0
4
x108
8
305.1 353.2385.1
407.1
465.1 493.1
300 400 500
3
5
10
2
x107
4
369.1
391.1
300 400 500
6
20
4
x108
8
359.3
385.1
407.1
421.3 465.0502.
300 400 500
6
20
4
x107
8
0
300
100
200
300200 250 [nm]
[mAU]
0
3000
1000
2000
300200 250 [nm]
[mAU]
200
100
0
300200 250 [nm]
[mAU]m/z m/z
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Supplemental Figure 4. Engineering of CYP81F genes in Nicotiana benthamiana – MS data.
Shown are the same LC-MS runs as in Figure 7 (A – G), and corresponding MS data for I3M (K – M) and for 4OH-I3M (H – J). Shown are also UV-spectra for I3M (N) and 4OH-I3M (O, P). UV- spectra for I3M are from I3M produced by heterologous expression of the indole glucosinolate core pathway in Nicotiana benthamiana (B), and UV-spectra for 4OH-I3M from an authentic standard (C), isolated from Isatis tinctorea (Dyer’s woad) as described in Pfalz et al. (2009), and from co- expression of CYP81F2 with glucosinolate core pathway genes (D) for comparison.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
6
7 8time [min]
0
0
0
10
5
x107
0
0
10
5
x107
0
10
5
x106
10
5
x107
0
10
5
x107
10
5
x107
10
5
x107
I3M4MO-I3M
1MO-I3M
B
C
D
E
F
G
A
Control
IGMT2
CYP81F1IGMT1
CYP81F2IGMT1
CYP81F3IGMT2
CYP81F4IGMT1
Col-0
6
2
0
4
x106
1301.1
333.2481.3
407.2
300 400 500
0
5
12
x106
43
307.1 369.2421.2 449.1 497.3
391.1
300 400 500
0
1
x106
1.5
0.5301.2
346.2
378.2399.2
436.2
452.2
479.1
421.2
300 400 500
0
1
x107
1.5
0.5399.1
479.1
421.1
300 400 500
0
1
x107
0.5
331.2
407.2
465.1
301.2
300 400 5000
1
x108
1.5
0.5369.1
391.1
300 400 500
1.5
0.5
0
1
x108
369.1
391.1
300 400 5000
0.5
1
x107
1.5
1.2320.2
407.2
465.1
301.1
300 400 500
0.5
0
1x108
369.1
391.1
300 400 500
0
1
2
x106
3
4
301.1
320.1359.2
407.2
421.2
455.1
307.1
300 400 5000
2
4
x107
6
8
369.1449.1
391.1
300 400 500
0.5
0
1
x108
369.1
391.1
300 400 5000
0.5
x107
301.2
331.2 359.1 439.3
481.3
407.2
300 400 500
4MO-I3M
Contaminant (7.4 min)
1MO-I3M
I3M
Col-0
Col-0
Col-0
Control
IGMT2
CYP81F2IGMT1
CYP81F4IGMT1
CYP81F3IGMT2
IGMT2
CYP81F1IGMT1
CYP81F1IGMT1
CYP81F2IGMT1
CYP81F3IGMT2
m/zm/z
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
Q
R
S
T
P
Supplemental Figure 5. Engineering of CYP81F and O-MT genes in Nicotiana benthamiana – MS data I.
Shown are the same extracted ion chromatograms as in the left panels of Figure 8 (A – G), and corresponding MS data for I3M (K – O) and for a contaminant eluting at 7.4 min with m/z 407 (P – T). MS data of 4MO-I3M (H), I3M (I) and 1MO-I3M (J) extracted from the seedlings of Arabidopsis Col-0 are shown for comparison.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
7
91.2
367.2
421.1
479.1
399.1
300 400 500
0
1.5
0.5
1
x107
0
2.5
0.51
x107
1.52
389.3
421.3
479.2
300 400 500
0
4
1
2
x106
3
301.2 367.2
399.2
479.1
421.1
300 400 5000
5
1
3
x107
2
4
1.2
399.2
479.1
421.1
300 400 500
0
2
4
x107
6
1.2
399.1
479.1
421.1
300 400 500012
x106
543
301.2 367.2
421.1
451.2 479.1
399.2
300 400 500
0
4
1
2
x106
3
305.3 343.2 367.2
399.2
479.1
421.1
300 400 500
0
5
12
x106
43
307.1 369.2421.2 449.1 497.3
391.1
300 400 500
0
1
x106
1.5
0.5301.2
346.2
378.2399.2
436.2
452.2
479.1
421.2
300 400 500
0
1
x107
1.5
0.5399.1
479.1
421.1
300 400 500
4MO-I3M
1MO-I3M
I3M
Col-0
Col-0
Col-0
7 8time [min]
0
0
0
10
5
x107
0
0
10
5
x107
0
10
5
x106
10
5
x107
0
10
5
x107
10
5
x107
10
5
x107
I3M4MO-I3M
1MO-I3M
B
C
D
E
F
G
A
Control
IGMT2
CYP81F1IGMT1
CYP81F2IGMT1
CYP81F3IGMT2
CYP81F4IGMT1
Col-0
CYP81F4IGMT1
CYP81F1IGMT1
CYP81F2IGMT1
CYP81F3IGMT2
CYP81F1IGMT1
CYP81F2IGMT1
CYP81F3IGMT2
m/z
m/z
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
Q
P
0
150
50
100
300200 250 [nm]
[mAU]
300200 250 [nm]0
1000
500
[mAU]R
S
Supplemental Figure 6. Engineering of CYP81F and O-MT genes in Nicotiana benthamiana – MS data II.
Shown are the same extracted ion chromatograms as in the left panels of Figure 8 (A – G), and corresponding MS data for 4MO-I3M (K – M) and for 1MO-I3M (N – Q). MS data of 4MO-I3M (H), I3M (I) and 1MO-I3M (J) extracted from the seedlings of Arabidopsis Col-0 are shown for comparison. Shown are also the UV-spectra of 4MO-I3M (R) and 1MO-I3M (S).
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
8
x 107
x 106
x 107
x 107
x 107
x 107
x 107
x 106
x 106
2
0
4
2
0
4
20
64
20
64
20
64
20
64
0.5
0
1
0.5
0
1
20
64
CYP81F1IGMT1
Col-0
CYP81F1IGMT2
CYP81F2IGMT1
CYP81F2IGMT2
CYP81F3IGMT1
CYP81F3IGMT2
CYP81F4IGMT1
CYP81F4IGMT2
I3M
4MO-I3M
1MO-I3MA
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
0.5
1
0
1
0
0.5
0.5
1
0
6 8 10
x 107
x 107
x 107
IGMT1
IGMT2
Control
J
K
L
a
b
a
a
b
b
b
b
b
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
9
Supplemental Figure 7. Co-expression of CYP81F and IGMT genes in Nicotiana benthamiana.
Shown are extracted ion chromatograms for m/z 391 and m/z 421 for all combinations of CYP81F and IGMT1 or IGMT2, coexpressed with the genes for the indole glucosinolate core pathway in N.benthamiana (B – I), and extracted ion chromatograms for m/z 391, m/z 407 and m/z 421 for IGMT1 or IGMT2 expressed without CYP81Fs (J, K) and for a control where Agrobacterium without expression constructs was infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana (L). Glucosinolate profiles from Arabidopsis Col-0 seedlings are shown for comparison (A), and I3M, 4MO-I3M and 1MO-I3M peaks are labelled. The peak corresponding to 1MO-I3M is indicated in panels B – H (black arrows). No 4MO-I3M peak is visible in assays with CYP81F4 (H, I). Experimental artefacts (a, b) are indicated.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
10
FLAG_140B06
10.0
3.04.05.0
2.0
BamHI
M M M W W
SALK_024438
10.0
3.04.05.0
2.0
HindIII
M M M W WW
SALK_031939
10.0
3.04.0
5.0
2.0 BamHI
W W W W MM
Supplemental Figure 8. DNA blots of T-DNA insertion lines.
Shown are the results of a non-radioactive hybridization with a T-DNA-specific probe (see: METHODS for experimental details). The hybridization pattern for FLAG_140B06 is compatible with a single insertion in mutants (M), while SALK_024438 and SALK_031939 mutants contain multiple insertions. Wildtypes (W) have no T-DNA insertions.
[kb][kb]
[kb]
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
11
Purpose Primer name Sequence (5' � 3')
Verification of T-DNA insertions 031939F CATACAACCACACAACCGTTG for SALK_031939 T-DNA insertion line 031939R CCTCCCAAATCTCTGGATCTC 024438F TGGGTCGAGTCTTACACAAGG for SALK_024438 T-DNA insertion line 024438R GGCTTAATGCTGGTAACGAATC 140B06F AACCCTCATGATACACGTATTTG for FLAG_140B06 T-DNA insertion line 140B06R TCTCGGCCCATTATGAGTAAG 123882-f TCGCCAAGTCGTAGTGATCTC for SALK_123882 T-DNA insertion line 123882-r TGCCTTTTTCAACACTTCAGG 005861-f GACTTTTCGGTTGTGTCCAG for SALK_005861 T-DNA insertion line 005861-r GTTCTTTCAGGCATTTCATCG
primer for left border of FLAG T-DNA FLAG-LB1 CGGCTATTGGTAATAGGACACTGG primer for left border of SALK T-DNA LBb1 AGTTGCAGCAAGCGGTCCACGC
Amplification of a T-DNA fragment as a probe for hybridization
FLAG-F GATGCGATGTTTCGCTTGGTG for FLAG T-DNA FLAG-R CTGGGCACAACAGACAATCG T-DNA_L1F TCCAGTTTGGAACAAGAGTCCA for SALK T-DNA T-DNA-L1R CCTGGCGTTACCCAACTTAATC
qRT-PCR with T-DNA insertion lines
RT-CYP400F GCCTAATGCTGGGCATGATG for CYP81F3 (At4g37400) RT-CYP400R CTTTAATATCCTCTGTTGGTG 37410seq2 CCCTGAGTACTACACTGAC for CYP81F4 (At4g37410) RT-410-(09)R CAAAACTTTTGGGTGGTTCAAC
RT-CYP430F GAACCGCTCTTATCTGATTG RT-CYP430R GGAAATAGCCGGAATGTTTC for CYP81F1 (At4g37430) and antisense
(At4g37432), respectively RT-CYP430-1F GCAGCGTTTGTTAGATGAATG Cyt2F GTCACAGGGAGACGCTACTAC for CYP81F2 (At5g57220) Cyt2R CACCACTGTTGTCATTGATGTC
EIF4A-f TGAACACCAGGCGTAAGGTTGA control gene EIF4A1 (At3g13920) EIF4A-r CCTTTCTCCCGAACCTTCCACT
Generation of expression constructs for Sf9 insect cell lines 400_Ins-Exp-KOZ-F GTGATGGTTTACTATGTGATTGTCC for CYP81F3 (At3g37400) 400_Ins-R ACCTTTTAAATGGGCCTGAAG 410_Ins-Exp-KOZ-F GTGATGGTTAACTATGTGATTATTCTTC for CYP81F4 (At3g37410) 410_Ins-R AACTTTCGTGTAGGCCGGG
Supplemental Table 1. Primer Sequences Used in This Work.
Supplemental Table 1. Primer Sequences Used in This Work.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
12
Purpose Primer name Sequence (5' � 3')
Generation of expression constructs for Nicotiana benthamiana CYP79B2f GGCTTAAUATGAACACTTTTACCTCAAACTCTTCG for CYP79B2 CYP79B2r GGTTTAAUTCACTTCACCGTCGGGTAGA CYP83B1f GGCTTAAUATGGATCTCTTATTGATTATAGCCGGT for CYP83B1 CYP83B1r GGCTTAAUTCAGATGTGTTTCGTTGGTGC
cAt1g21100F ATGGGATACCTTTTTCAAGAAAC amplification of full-length coding sequence from IGMT1 (At1g21100) cAt1g21100R TTATTTACAGAATTCAATAATCCAGC
cAt1g21120F ATGGGATACCTTTTCGAAGAAAC amplification of full-length coding sequence from IGMT2 (At1g21120) cAt1g21120R TTATTTACAGAACTCAATAATCCAGC
c400_F ATGTTTTACTATGTGATTGTCC amplification of full-length coding sequence from CYP81F3 c400_R CTAACCTTTTAAATGGGCCTG
c410_F ATGTTTAACTATGTGATTATTCTTCC amplification of full-length coding sequence from CYP81F4 c410_R CTAAACTTTCGTGTAGGCCG
c430_F ATGTTATACTTCATCCTTCTCC amplification of full-length coding sequence from CYP81F1 c430_R TTAGAGTAAAAGCTTTGACATAA
c220_F ATGGATTACGTTTTGATTGTTTTGC amplification of full-length coding sequence from CYP81F5 c220_R TTAAGCCAAGAGATTAGTCATAATG
21100_attB1F GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATGGGATACCTTTTTCAAGAAAC 21100/21120_attB2R GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TTATTTACAGAAYTCAATAATCCAGC GATEWAY adaptor primer for IGMT1 and
IGMT2, respectively 21120_attB1F GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATGGGATACCTTTTCGAAGAAAC 400_attB1F GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATGTTTTACTATGTGATTGTCC GATEWAY adaptor primer for CYP81F3 400_attB2R GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG CTAACCTTTTAAATGGGCC 410_attB1F GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATGTTTAACTATGTGATTATTCTTC GATEWAY adaptor primer for CYP81F4 410_attB2R GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG CTAAACTTTCGTGTAGGCC 430_attB1F GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATGTTATACTTCATCCTTCTCC GATEWAY adaptor primer for CYP81F1 430_attB2R GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TTAGAGTAAAAGCTTTGACATA 220_attB1F GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATGGATTACGTTTTGATTGTTTTGC GATEWAY adaptor primer for CYP81F2 220_attB2R GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTG TTAAGCCAAGAGATTAGTCATAATG
Supplemental Table 1, cont.
Supplemental Data. Pfalz et al. (2011). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.081711
13