corporate restructuring shahzad hussain(2)

29
CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING Shahzad Hussain, FCA A. F. Ferguson & Co. Chartered Accountants

Upload: asad-mehmood

Post on 10-Apr-2015

101 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

Shahzad Hussain, FCAA. F. Ferguson & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Page 2: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

2

Introduction

• Following are some of the examples of corporate restructuring that could lead to tax benefits:

1. Mergers and acquisitions2. Acquisitions of shares3. Financing through debt4. Capital gains

• To avail tax benefits, corporate restructuring should be carried out keeping in view the anti avoidance provisions contained in sections 108 and 109 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Page 3: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

3

Tax avoidanceBrief history:

Tax avoidance is not a new phenomenon. One of the leading cases on avoidance was heard by the House of Lords 70 years ago (IR Commrs v Duke of Westminster (1935) 19 TC 490). In that case, the Duke of Westminster sought to minimize his tax exposure by covenanting with his gardener that he would pay the gardener an annuity in lieu of some of his wages. Payments made under a deed of covenant were then tax deductible.

In a much quoted speech, Lord Tomlin observed:

‘Every man is entitled if he can to order his affairs so that the tax attaching under the appropriate Acts is less than it otherwise would be.’

Previously, ‘tax avoidance’ was distinguished from ‘tax evasion’ by virtue of the former being legal and the latter illegal. Now in England, recent pronouncements by Government functionaries appeared to have blurred this distinction (notwithstanding Lord Tomlin’s remarks above). The provisions of section 108 and 109 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 appeared to be in line with these pronouncements. These provisions are as follows:

Page 4: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

4

…Tax avoidance

Section 108: Transactions between associates

“(1) The Commissioner may, in respect of any transaction between persons who are associates, distribute, apportion or allocate income, deductions or tax credits between the persons as is necessary to reflect the income that the persons would have realised in an arm’s length transaction.

(2) In making any adjustment under sub-section (1), the Commissioner may determine the source of income and the nature of any payment or loss as revenue, capital or otherwise.”

Page 5: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

5

…Tax avoidance

Section 109: Recharacterisation of income and deductions

“(1) For the purposes of determining liability to tax under this Ordinance, the Commissioner may –

(a) recharacterise a transaction or an element of a transaction that was entered into as part of a tax avoidance scheme;

(b) disregard a transaction that does not have substantial economic effect; or

(c) recharacterise a transaction where the form of the transaction does not reflect the substance.

(2) In this section, “tax avoidance scheme” means any transaction where one of the main purposes of a person in entering into the transaction is the avoidance or reduction of any person’s liability to tax under this Ordinance.”

Page 6: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

6

1. Mergers and acquisitionsReasons why mergers and acquisitions take

place:

• For expansion purposes, merging with a company within the geographical area is quicker than internal expansion

• For diversification purposes, to allow the company to diversify into other lines of business

• For financial motivation, the target company may be undervalued

• Tax benefits

Page 7: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

7

…Mergers and acquisitions

Types of mergers:

• ‘Horizontal merger’ – when two competitors combine; it would lead to increase in market power and it will have anti competitive effects (may have to be approved by monopolies control authority)

• ‘Vertical merger’ – these are combination of companies that have buyer-seller relation, e.g., manufacturer of a product and distributor of that product.

• ‘Conglomerate merger’ – when merging companies are not competitors and do not have buyer-seller relationship. These companies could be running different businesses.

Page 8: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

8

…Mergers and acquisitions

Accepted accounting methods of business combinations:

• Purchase method: Generally speaking, the purchase method accounts for a business combination as the acquisition of one company’s net assets by another. The purchase price and costs of acquisition are allocated to all the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair values. If the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the purchased company’s net assets, the excess is recorded as ‘goodwill’. Earnings or losses of the purchased company are included in the acquiring company’s financial statements from the closing date of the acquisition.

• Pooling of interest method (purely for mergers): This method accounts for a business combination as a uniting of ownership interests of two companies by the exchange of equity shares. No acquisition is recognized because the combination is accomplished without disbursing resources of the constituents. In pooling of interest accounting, the assets, liabilities and retained earnings of each company are carried forward at their previous carrying amounts. Operating results of both companies are combined for all periods prior to the closing date, and previously issued financial statements are restated as though the companies had always been combined.

Page 9: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

9

Purchase method

• Assume a Company ‘B’ purchases net assets of Company ‘A’ for a consideration of Rs 250,000. The payment for consideration is agreed upon as follow:

– Issue shares of Company ‘B’ for Rs 125,000 at Rs 15 per share; and

– Pay cash of Rs 125,000.

Example ‘1’ Company ‘A’

Company ‘B’

Share capital 100,000 300,000

Reserves 60,000 100,000

160,000 400,000

Long term liabilities

50,000 60,000

Current liabilities 60,000 90,000

270,000 550,000

Fixed assets 150,000 390,000

Current assets 120,000 160,000

270,000 550,000

Page 10: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

10

…Purchase method

• On the date of the acquisition, fixed assets of Company ‘A’ are re-valued in the following manner shown

Revaluation of fixed assets of Company ‘A’

Net Book Value

(Rupees)Fair Value (Rupees)

Land 30,000 50,000

Plant and machinery

100,000 150,000

Other assets 20,000 30,000

150,000 230,000

Page 11: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

11

…Purchase method

• The ‘post acquisition’ balance sheet of Company ‘B’, under the Purchase method would appear as:

Balance Sheet (Rupees)

Share capital-Original shares-New shares

300,00083,333

383,333

Share Premium 41,667

Reserves 100,000

Long term loans(A:50,000 + B:60,000)

110,000

Current liabilities (A:185,000+B:90,000)

275,000

910,000

Fixed assets(A:230,000+B:390,000)

620,000

Goodwill 135,000

Current assets(A:120,000+B:160,000-125,000)

155,000

910,000

Page 12: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

12

…Purchase method

• The books of Company ‘A’ and its balance sheet would reflect the post acquisition position, in the manner shown opposite:

• Gain on disposal of plant and machinery and other assets is taxable whereas, gain on land is not taxable under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Balance Sheet of Company ‘A’ (Rupees)

Share capital 100,000

Reserves 60,000

Gain on sale of net assets

90,000

250,000

Shares in Company ‘B’

125,000

Receivable from Company ‘B’

125,000

250,000

Page 13: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

13

…Purchase method• For the acquiring Company ‘B’, tax depreciation will be available on

the revalued amount of plant and machinery and other depreciable assets

• Goodwill amortization may not be available as a tax expense. However, according to the impairment standard, goodwill can be charged off for accounting purposes – Debatable issue

• Under the new IFRS 3, where only purchase method is allowed, some amount can be assigned to intangibles such as:

– Advertising contracts– Favorable leasehold interests– Franchise agreements– Intellectual property

• Patents• Trademarks

– Customer relationship– Internet domain– Access to research and development

• This will reduce the value of goodwill for accounting purposes

• Whether the intangible allocation will be permissible as a tax allowable expense is yet to be tested. But costs incurred as intangibles are allowed as tax deduction over the useful life of the intangible

Page 14: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

14

Pooling of interest method• Using the same information as given in

Example ‘1’, but with the following exceptions:

– Swap ratio being 1.5 shares of Company ‘B’ for every 1 share of Company ‘A’; and

– Fixed assets are carried at their net book value, as shown below:

Fixed assets of Company ‘A’

Net Book Value

(Rupees)

Land 30,000

Plant and machinery 100,000

Other assets 20,000

150,000

Page 15: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

15

…Pooling of interest method

– Legal merger through court;

– Assets and liabilities of Company ‘A’ would vest in Company ‘B’, through court’s approval; and

– Company ‘A’ is wound up without the winding-up process, through a court order

• The ‘post merger’ Balance Sheet of the amalgamated (merged) Company ‘B’ would be as follows:

Page 16: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

16

ComparisonBalance sheet of Company ‘B’

Pooling of

interest method

Purchase

method

(Rupees) (Rupees)

Share Capital:-Original equity-New issue

300,000150,000

300,00083,333

450,000 383,333

Share Premium - 41,667

Reserves 160,000 100,000

Merger reserve (50,000) -

Long term liabilities 110,000 110,000

Current liabilities 150,000 275,000

820,000 910,000

Fixed assets 540,000 620,000

Goodwill - 10,000

Current assets 280,000 280,000

820,000 910,000

Page 17: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

17

Corporate law and Pooling of interest

• Corporate statutes allow the companies to re-organize or re-construct the business. This provision is contained in sections 282 to 284 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984.

• Practical application of these sections reveal that combination undertaken by way of the provisions represents ‘pooling of interest’ for legal and fiscal purposes.

Page 18: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

18

Tax benefits arising from merger• No taxable event in the hands of the amalgamating

Company ‘A’

• No taxable event in the hands of shareholders (of the amalgamating company) acquiring shares in the surviving entity – no ‘Disposal’

• Definition of disposal - Section 75 states that:

“(1) A person who holds an asset shall be treated as having made a disposal of the asset at the time the person parts with the ownership of the asset, including when the asset is – (a) sold, exchanged, transferred or distributed; or(b) cancelled, redeemed, relinquished, destroyed, lost, expired or surrendered.”

• Tax losses of amalgamating company and surviving company are available to the surviving company; provided that the losses are from the same line of business, as provided for in section 57A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 – restricted scope

Page 19: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

19

2. Acquisition of shares• Under this option, the shares of a company are

acquired to include it as a ‘subsidiary’ in the group.

Group relief

• The concept of ‘Group Relief’ was introduced in the Pakistan tax laws through Finance Act, 2004. A whole new section 59B was inserted in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and subsequently it was further amended by Finance Act, 2005. It was a business friendly amendment aimed at promoting corporate growth and restoration of sick units.

• Under the provisions of section 59B, any company is allowed to surrender its assessed loss for the tax year, other than brought forward losses, in favor of its holding company provided that the holding company owns 75% or more of the share capital of the subsidiary company. This is illustrated in the following example:

Page 20: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

20

…Acquisition of shares

Example ‘2’: Consider the following

Holding

company

Subsidiary

company

(Rupees) (Rupees)

Taxable income/ (loss) for the year

100,000 (50,000)

Tax thereon @ 35% 35,000 -

Cash outflow 35,000 -

(Rupees)

Under Group relief:

Taxable income of holding company

100,000

Taxable loss of subsidiary company

(50,000)

50,000

Tax thereon @ 35% 17,500

Cash outflow under group relief

17,500

Page 21: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

21

3. Financing through debtExample ‘3’: Parent company (non-resident) would attract incidence of Pakistan tax, through equity investment and through debt instruments in the following way:

Profit and loss account

All equity

investment

Debt/ equity

investment

(Rupees) (Rupees)

Profit before tax and interest 100,000 100,000

Less: Interest charges on borrowed funds

- 50,000

100,000 50,000

Tax @ 35% 35,000 17,500

Profit after tax, available for distribution

65,000 32,500

Dividend 65,000 32,500

- -

Page 22: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

22

…Financing through debt

Share of the (non-resident) parent company:

All equity

investment

Debt/ equity

investment

(Rupees) (Rupees)

Interest - 50,000

Less: Taxes @ 10%1 - 5,000

- 45,000

Dividend 65,000 32,500

Less: withholding taxes @ 10%

6,500 3,250

58,500 29,250

Net receipts 58,500 74,250

1 Loans through a favourable Treaty country. Exemption can also be considered in

the light of few advantageous provisions in the Second Schedule available for ‘industrial undertakings’.

Page 23: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

23

…Financing through debt

Gain to the (non-resident) parent company in financing through debt:

(Rupees)

Receipts from ‘leveraged’ company 74,250

Receipts from ‘all equity’ company 58,500

Increase in wealth 15,750

Saving in taxes on interest (Rs 50,000 x 35%)

17,500

Adj: Tax payable on interest income(Rs 50,000 x 10%)

5,000

Less: Taxes deducted at source on dividend income (Rs 32,500 x 10%)

3,250 1,750

Net gain in taxes to the non-resident

15,750

Page 24: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

24

…Financing through debt

Thin capitalization

• A new concept of ‘Thin capitalization’ has been introduced in section 106 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to cover payments of interest (profit on debt) by the ‘foreign controlled resident companies’ to the non-resident holding company. The provisions of section 106 state that:

“…(1) Where a foreign-controlled resident company (other than a financial institution [or a banking company)] has a foreign debt-to-foreign equity ratio in excess of three to one at any time during a tax year, a deduction shall be disallowed for the profit on debt paid by the company in that year on that part of the debt which exceeds the three to one ratio…”

• Under the provisions of section 106, only that portion of interest payment will be allowed as a deduction from income which does not exceed the foreign debt-to-foreign equity ratio of 3-to-1. This point is further illustrated by the following example ‘3’

Page 25: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

25

…Financing through debt

Example ‘4’: Assume a Company ‘A’, wholly owned subsidiary of Company ‘B’ (the non-resident holding company) claims an amount of Rs 150,000 on account of interest paid on money borrowed from the Company ‘B’. Also assume that:

(Rupees)

Loan from Company ‘B’ 3,500,000

Investment in equity by Company ‘B’ 1,000,000

Excess amount of debt will be[(foreign equity x 3) – total debt]

500,000

Computation of inadmissible deduction:

Total interest claimed 150,000

Less: inadmissible portion of interest [(excess debt x total interest) total debt]

21,429

Allowable deduction under section 106 128,571

Page 26: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

26

4. Capital gains• Capital gain would accrue to the

seller in the event the shares of a resident company are disposed off – generally a taxable event.

• The incidence of Pakistan tax on disposal of shares (under the above option) can be avoided through the mechanism of ‘tax planning’ i.e. treaty shopping. For instance, favourable provisions are available in the Double Tax Treaties with Netherlands and Mauritius.

Page 27: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

27

…Capital gains

Example ‘5’: Assume that the ‘non-resident holding company’ is situated in ‘Mauritius’ and owns 10,000 shares of a resident company. The balance sheet of the resident company reveals that

Year 1 Year 2

(Rupees) (Rupees)

Share capital (10,000 shares @ Rs 10per share)

100,000 100,000

Reserves - 50,000

100,000 150,000

Share price (per share) 10 15

Page 28: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

28

…Capital gains

(Rupees)

Receipts from resident company:

Dividends 50,000

Less: tax withheld @ 10% 5,000

Net dividend received 45,000

Gain on sale of shares:

Sales proceeds (10,000 shares @ Rs 15 per share)

150,000

Purchase price (10,000 shares @ Rs 10 per share)

100,000

Capital gain from sale of shares (exempt under Article 13 of the DTT with Mauritius)

50,000

Page 29: Corporate Restructuring Shahzad Hussain(2)

29