copyrighted © 2000 pg&e all rights reserved case initiative project energy analysis review of...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Energy AnalysisReview of Implications
Jon McHugh, Sr. Project Mgr.The HESCHONG MAHONE GROUP
forPacific Gas & Electric Co.
Codes & Standards Program
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Residential Energy Model
1761 SF house with equal glazing distribution in each direction
Hourly energy values from TDV research version of MICROPAS
A/C and Heat Pump Efficiency adjusted with respect to ambient temperature
DHW loads allocated to 4 load profiles from PG&E load survey data• weekday vs. weekend • summer vs winter
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Residential TDV Energy Costs
Hourly energy multiplied by hourly energy costs for all 8,760 hours of the year
30 Year PV, 3% real discount rate Three energy sources:
• Electricity• Natural gas• Propane
Multiplies by hourly TDV costs for five CA climate zones:3 (Oakland), 6 (Long Beach), 13 (Fresno),14 (China Lake) 16 (Shasta)
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Fresno Residential Measures
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
Ins
Cei
ling
Fur
nace
Ins
Cei
ling
HP
Low
-eF
urna
ce
Low
-e H
P
SEE
R 1
0to
12
Ele
c to
Fue
l DH
W
HP
toF
urna
ce
Flat NG (Original)
TDV Nat Gas
TDV Propane
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Shasta Residential Measures
$0.00
$2.00
$4.00
$6.00
$8.00
$10.00
$12.00
$14.00
Ins
Cei
ling
Fur
nace
Ins
Cei
ling
HP
Low
-eF
urna
ce
Low
-e H
P
SEE
R 1
0to
12
Ele
c to
Fue
l DH
W
HP
toF
urna
ce
Flat NG (Original)
TDV Nat Gas
TDV Propane
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Oakland Residential Measures
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
$4.00
Ins
Cei
ling
Furn
ace
Ins
Cei
ling
HP
R30
to R
38Fu
el H
eat
R30
to R
38H
eat P
ump
Low
-eFu
rnac
e
Low
-e H
P
SEER
10
to12
Elec
to F
uel
DH
W HP
toFu
rnac
e
Flat NG (Original)
TDV Nat Gas
TDV Propane
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Oakland Residential Measures
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
$4.00
Ins
Cei
ling
Furn
ace
Ins
Cei
ling
HP
R30
to R
38Fu
el H
eat
R30
to R
38H
eat P
ump
Low
-eFu
rnac
e
Low
-e H
P
SEER
10
to12
Elec
to F
uel
DH
W HP
toFu
rnac
e
Flat NG (Original)
TDV Nat Gas
TDV Propane
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Residential Conclusions
TDV costing increased the value of all efficiency measures considered
Electricity more expensive when very hot or very cold
Natural gas and propane more expensive in winter than summer
Benefit of switching to fuel less for propane than natural gas
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Nonresidential Energy Results
Same energy results from earlier work (1999 Dollar Based Standards project)
6 protoype buildings Typical schedules for each building type
(divergence from ACM rules) DOE-2 model not EnergyPro Hourly energy results multiplied by TDV
energy costs for 8,760 h/yr TDV costs:
15 year PV at 3% real discount rate
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Fresno Nonresidential Measures
$(10.00)
$(8.00)
$(6.00)
$(4.00)
$(2.00)
$-
$2.00
$4.00
Offi
ce
Scho
ol
Reta
il
Hosp
ital
Offi
ce
Scho
ol
Reta
il
Hosp
ital
Offi
ce
Scho
ol
Reta
il
Hosp
ital
PV E
nerg
y Sa
ving
s 20
01 $
/SF
Flat NG (original)
TDV Nat Gas
TDV Propane
TES Gas Cooling Electric Heating
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Fresno Nonresidential Measures
$-
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
$4.00
$4.50
Offic
e
Scho
ol
Reta
il
Hosp
ital
Offic
e
Scho
ol
Reta
il
Hosp
ital
Offic
e
Scho
ol
Reta
il
Hosp
ital
PV E
nerg
y Sa
vings
200
1 $/
SF
Flat NG (original)
TDV Nat Gas
TDV Propane
Low-e Low LPD Eff. Chiller
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Nonresidential Conclusions
Results are dependent on building type TDV results for TES inverse of traditional
flat costing Value of gas cooling is increased Results for heating measures affected by
Fuel type (Nat gas vs. Propane) Greater value for A/C efficiency Lighting LPD valuation sensitive to
schedule (occupancy)
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Residential TDV - further work
TDV duct efficiency Refined water heater model SEER to EIR conversion Heat pump sizing - resistance strip
contribution to winter peak Thermostat schedules - especially for heat
pumps
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Nonresidential TDV - further work
ACM revisions• Equipment curves• SEER to EIR conversion based on curves• Occupancy specific schedules• Add TES and Gas Cooling• Add Photovoltaics and Solar Heating
Peer review of equipment curves Obtain/develop part load curves Revisit equipment specific curves Occupancy sensors vs time clocks Persistence of measures
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
TDV Web Page
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
TDV Web Page
http://www.h-m-g.com/TDV/index.htm Reports
• Dollar-Based Performance Standards (1999)• TDV Summary Report (2000)
Software • ResTDV.xls• NonresTDV.xls
Comment form
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved
CASE Initiative Project
Comments/Suggestions
Gary Fernstrom, PG&E(415) [email protected]
Douglas Mahone, HMG(916) [email protected]