coproduction northern ireland

51
Welcome to Talking, Learning, Sharing Time for Change? Tweet: #makinglocalwork

Upload: timebanks-northern-ireland

Post on 03-Aug-2015

332 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Welcome to

Talking, Learning, Sharing

Time for Change?

Tweet: #makinglocalwork

Wendy Osborne OBE

CEO Volunteer Now

Dave Wall

Department for Social Development

Director of Policy and Communications

Co-production: what it

is and why it matters Lucie Stephens,

Head of Co-production

About NEF

• Independent ‘think and do’ tank

• Seeking sustainable social justice: the

three economies

• Work alongside practitioners to promote

innovative solutions

• Developed a range of practical tools and

publications including well-being, SROI

and timebanking

What is co-production?

Co-production is a relationship where

professionals and citizens share power to

plan and deliver support together,

recognising that both partners have vital

contributions to make in order to improve

quality of life for people and communities.

Co-production Critical Friends Group, 2012

What is co-production?

The ‘jargon buster’ version

When you as an individual are involved as

an equal partner is designing the support

and services you receive. Co-production

recognises that people who use social care

services (and their families) have knowledge

and experience that can be used to help make

services better, not only for themselves but for

other people who need social care.

Think Local Act Personal

Why co-production matters

The core economy =

countless under-valued and priceless human and social assets that make it possible for society to flourish.

Co-production enables public service agencies to value and grow the core economy.

Co-production in real life

• http://www.hcct.org.uk/

• http://www.camdenshares.org.uk/#

Recognising co-production

• Seeing people as assets: working with people’s expertise by experience

• Building on our capabilities: supporting people to put their skills to use

• Developing two way relationships: mutual responsibilities and expectations

• Growing peer support: supporting networks

• Blurring distinctions: reconfiguring how services are designed and delivered

• Facilitating not delivering: enabling people to achieve their own personal goals

How is it different?

Doing With: Outcomes cannot be done to or for people, they are achieved with people, through equal and reciprocal relationships. People’s voices are heard, valued, debated and then – most importantly – acted upon.

Doing For: Participation invites people to be heard but they are not given the power to make sure that their ideas or opinions shape decision making.

Doing To: People are expected to agree that the service will do them good and let it ‘happen to them’.

What is co-production?

Who designs?

Professionals

design services

People &

professionals

together

People design

services

Wh

o d

elivers

?

Professionals

deliver services

Traditional service

model

Co-designed

services

Professionals &

people together

Co-delivered

services

Co-produced

services

People deliver

services

People trained to

deliver services

Self-organised

community provision

Levels of co-production

• Basic: acknowledges people’s action is intrinsic to the outcome.

• Intermediate: recognises that people’s lived experience can improve services.

• Transformative: involves citizens in designing, commissioning and delivering services. Transforms power and control.

• Transformation scenario: Additive co-production where public sector resources are combined with individual and community resources.

• Cuts scenario: Substitutive co-production with public sector inputs replaced by citizens or communities.

What is well-being?

5 ways to well-being

• Connect: invest in relationships

• Be active: get out and about

• Take notice: be in the moment

• Keep learning: do new things

• Give: do things for others

Well-being and co-production

Competence

Autonomy

Relatedness

Recognising people as assets

Building on capabilities

Blurring distinctions

Facilitating not delivering

Mutuality and reciprocity

Peer support networks

Self-determination theory Key features of co-production

Why co-production matters

Focussing on co-production leads to

• Increased participation and engagement in

ways that are meaningful for citizens and

service users

• Genuine empowerment and ownership

• More relevant and effective services

• Improved wellbeing, greater solidarity

• Sustainability and value for money

Find out more

www.neweconomics.org

@NEF

Co-production, the ‘core economy’ and community planning: The Northern Ireland Context

Professor John Barry

Queens University Belfast

[email protected]

Basic co-ordinating institutions of human society

(Nation)-State – 300-400 years

Market – ‘truck and barter’ (c.12,000 years/settled agriculture), modern industrial/capitalist economy (c.250 years)

Community – since we evolved as a species of homo sapiens (c.50,000 years)

Co-production and the core economy

Distinguishing between ‘employment’ and work/labour – not all socially necessary labour is monetised i.e. is not formally paid employment (public or private);

The ‘hidden’ economy upon which the formal (public and private sector) economy is based;

Different terms – ‘core economy’, ‘convivial economy’ ‘informal economy’, ‘social economy’ – not all same but all gesture towards productive labour/activity that is beyond the public/state and private/market economy

The economy from a different perspective

Co-production: what is it?

“Co-production means delivering public services in an equal and reciprocal relationship between professionals, people using services, their families and their neighbours. Where activities are co-produced in this way, both services and neighbourhoods become far more effective agents of change.”

new economics foundation

“The involvement of citizens in the delivery of public services to achieve outcomes, which depend at least partly on their own behaviour and the assets and resources they bring” (Boviard, 2012)

Asset backed community development and empowerment

Every person and every community is of value and has something to contribute.

The task for statutory agencies is to work with people and communities to identify and build on the assets they have, helping them to set their goals and aspirations and assisting them to achieve them.

Genuine partnership working

Assets=Resources=Strengths

Financial – money, credit, savings;

Buildings – schools, church halls, roads;

Social – kith & kin, community, trust, networks of support;

Tools/equipment, books. IT, etc.

TIME!!

Personal – health & well being, education, experience, skills, motivation, self esteem;

Natural – environment, energy, natural resources, greenspaces;

Political – influence, power, active citizenship;

Access is not equal, there are barriers beyond individual control

Beyond orthodox economic thinking

Because GDP measures only monetary transactions related to the production of goods and services, it is based on an incomplete picture the human economy.

The human economy is a sub-system of larger social networks and ecosystem

A co-production perspective offer a more complete picture of how the human economic system fits within the social and environmental systems upon which it depends

By including the non-monetary social (and very often gendered) context of core economic activity

The ‘Core Economy’ and Quality of life

Beyond GDP and conventional economic measurements

Measuring what matters

GDP/economic growth does not distinguish between positive and negative economic activity (judged in terms of human well-being)

Core economy helps support relationships and social capital and in that process helps better public services

The Reform of Local Government (RPA) in Northern Ireland

The reform process as the refounding and not just the administrative reforming of local government in Northern Ireland

New contract /relationship between citizen and local government

“Without vision the people perish”

Key elements of that refounding-

General power of competence for local councils

Community planning

Community planning and the core economy

Community planning: Opportunity for ‘asset backed’ community development

Asset mapping – what are the capacities, skills, etc. of the community?

Co-production

‘Values the capacity, skills, knowledge connections and potential in a community… sees citizens and communities as co-producers of health and well being (and) instead of doing things for people shares power and helps a community to do things for itself’

(Improvement and Development Agency, 2010)

Building on people’s existing capabilities: altering the delivery model and mindset within public services from a ‘deficit’ approach to one that provides opportunities to develop people’s capabilities at an individual and community level;

People as ‘active citizens’: and neither passive consumers or rate/tax payers and also co-production and community planning as ways to repoliticise and democratise public services;

Valuing and promoting active citizenship (sometimes oppositional) as a form of ‘caring/care labour’ for democracy

Reciprocity, transparency and mutuality: offering people a range of incentives to engage which enable reciprocal relationships with professionals and with each other, where there are mutual responsibilities, agreed expectations and greater degrees of transparency and communication

Co-production and community planning

Co-production and community planning Partnership between statutory and non-statutory organisations:

relations of equality, respect and mutual learning and sharing.

Experts/professionals – ‘on tap not on top’: as facilitators of community change not drivers of it

Importance of trust and partnership – not wasting people’s time and energy, beyond passive consultation on service delivery towards genuine and demonstrable participation and co-decision-making

Creating resilient and empowered communities

And achieve progress and delivery of improvement to the daily lives of citizens at local level in ways the Executive and Stormont Assembly cannot…

And potentially do so in ways that don’t necessarily require more funding – change the decision-making dynamics – more democratic power to citizens not necessarily more money?

Conclusion

Co-production and community planning:

from ‘no taxation without representation’ to ‘no taxation/public service provision without participation’?

Some resources

Co-production practioners’ network:

www.coproductionnetwork.com

New economics foundation: http://www.neweconomics.org/

Jenny O’Hara

.

Humans need a social infrastructure as much as they

need roads, bridges and utility lines’ (Cahn, E (2004) 169).

Talking, Learning, Sharing – Time for Change? Volunteer Now, Belfast

19th June 2014

From Concept to

Delivery

A story of about

co-producing social change from South Wales

& the ‘taking it to scale’ challenge!!

Content of Presentation

1. Context

2. Glyncoch’s Slow Start

3. Embracing Assets and Chaos

4. The underlying logos / method in the madness

5. Social change

6. Taking co-production and time banking to scale

3

Context…

• Glyncoch is in Rhondda

Cynon Taf

• South Wales Valley’s social

housing estate

• Economic decline since

closure of coal mines and

demise of manufacturing

• One of the most

disadvantaged communities

in Wales (WIMD; 2011)

• Focus of ‘Communities First’

Welsh Government Anti

Poverty Programme

Glyncoch’s slow start

2005

Gloomy, bored,unproductive and deficit focused multi sector, multi agency

partnership……

Underlying attitude…

‘This poor community needs to get

involved in constructive

partnership meetings, with

professionals that know what

they are doing, get educated,

health and most of all get into

work.’

Embracing Assets and Chaos

• Time Banking Wales helped us audit volunteering hours. In a community of less than 3000 people, over 32,000 hours of volunteering took place (increasing to 37,000 hours with time banking)

• We did an asset map

• We came to see the community as an eco-system of seemingly random but interconnected activity…and full of amazing people doing amazing things!

Barton, Hugh and Grant, Marcus (2006)

Which do you prefer?

Which will have the strongest

outcome?

• Deficit = Intervention = Outcome

• Asset = Collaboration = Outcome

Method in Madness…

1. Community Supper AGM –

Community Groups and Members

present to each other and

appreciate each other!!

2. 3 themes chosen

3. 3 Co-design EVENTS (per year)….

4. Everyone does their bit…small

projects, big projects

5. Relationships and engagement

builds through reciprocal action

(time banking)

6. Report to each other the following

year…reflect..

7. Co-design and co-produce another

year of activity around theme…

Example:

Action to

Obliterate

Crime

y

Po Police and

community safety–

Fun events and

open days

Grot spot 2 hot spot

Gateway

Sculpture

Multicultural

Awareness

Festival

Murals

Bio - diversity

Clean up

Recycling

Awareness

Always asking ourselves these

questions….

1. How do we recognise all people as assets?

2. Recognise the existing skills and attributes of

local people?

3. How do we promote mutuality and

reciprocity?

4. How do we enable peer support networks.

5. How do we break down barriers between

professionals and recipients?

6. How do we come together with a sense of our

direction…and work it out together?

The IMPACT…

• Truancy amongst some year groups has dropped by a third and is now on a par

with more affluent areas as is attainment at GCSE

• Over 100 adults per year are engaged in learning…learning feels as though it is

more of a cultural norm

• A by-product of all of this…we have the LOWEST crime rate in the Pontypridd

district

• Significant environmental improvements

Taking Co-pro to Scale

Next Challenge… • Service Providers – signed

up to co-production!!

2. Action to support voices of community members / citizens?

- VOICE

- CITIZENS UK

- STREET AMABASSADORS

3. Asset Mapping

4. Bringing above together!!

6. County time bank design

5. Participatory Action Research

Participatory Action Research…as an

ongoing approach

PLANNED PROCESS

• Train together as researchers

(ethnographic or appreciative– inquiry)

• Undertake ‘listening campaign’ / research and map current work.

• Bring together stakeholders

• Co-design a programme – perhaps based on what is already in place – using learning

• Reflect and develop an upwards cycle of improvement that includes families

2 Participatory Action Research Projects

1. Reducing isolation

2. Raising achievement in

Learning

Across Communities and Sectors…

-engaging

- planning

- action

- reflection / learning (Using Co-pro

framework)

…..SOCIAL CHANGE ON A

BIGGER SCALE!!

Discussion

Tweet: #makinglocalwork