conventional radiotherapy vs. flash-radiotherapy cancer ... · with flash-rt prototype, chuv...

3
Departement für Kleintiere Abteilung für Radio-Onkologie Universität Zürich Departement für Kleintiere Winterthurerstrasse 260 CH-8057 Zürich Conventional Radiotherapy vs. FLASH-Radiotherapy Cancer research project Cats with squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal planum For more details and questions don`t hesitate to ask us. Thank you for your trust! Team Division of Radiation Oncology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich (in cooperation with CHUV Lausanne) contact: [email protected] What is the study duration? What are the costs of participation? 5 days total hospital stay at the Small Animal Clinic, University of Zurich Follow-up: after 2, 4, 6 weeks Follow-up: after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 months Cost participation for therapy: CHF 650.- (instead of CHF 3'500.-) Follow-up: free of cost Possible advantages of participation? Possible disadvantages of participation? You`re supporting cancer research Your cat will be treated with the standard treatment therapy (10 sessions) or with an experimental treatment (1 session) Lower costs Maybe more side effects with FLASH- Radiotherapy, because it`s still experimental General anesthesia- and radiotherapy-risks (discussed individually) Treatment schedule Conventional Radiotherapy FLASH-Radiotherapy Treatment will be allocated randomly (by chance) 5 days total hospital stay at the Tierspital Zurich Radiotherapy with the linear accelerator at the Tierspital Zurich Radiotherapy duration 1-2 Min; 2x daily, 5 consecutive days Ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (100x faster) with FLASH-RT prototype, CHUV Lausanne Radiotherapy duration <1 Sec; only 1 unit of radiotherapy Follow-ups: after 2, 4, 6 weeks and after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 months Goals of the project Compare treatment outcome after 10 conventional vs. 1 FLASH-session Future improvement of radiotherapy with fewer treatments / anesthesias Comparability of the side effects of both treatments Cancer research – translation to human medicine

Upload: others

Post on 25-Aug-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Conventional Radiotherapy vs. FLASH-Radiotherapy Cancer ... · with FLASH-RT prototype, CHUV Lausanne • Radiotherapy duration

Departement für Kleintiere Abteilung für Radio-Onkologie Universität Zürich Departement für Kleintiere Winterthurerstrasse 260 CH-8057 Zürich

Conventional Radiotherapy vs. FLASH-Radiotherapy Cancer research project

Cats with squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal planum

For more details and questions don`t hesitate to ask us. Thank you for your trust! Team Division of Radiation Oncology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich (in cooperation with CHUV Lausanne) contact: [email protected]

What is the study duration? What are the costs of participation?

• 5 days total hospital stay at the Small Animal Clinic, University of Zurich

• Follow-up: after 2, 4, 6 weeks • Follow-up: after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 months

• Cost participation for therapy: CHF 650.- (instead of CHF 3'500.-)

• Follow-up: free of cost

Possible advantages of participation?

Possible disadvantages of participation?

• You`re supporting cancer research • Your cat will be treated with the

standard treatment therapy (10 sessions) or with an experimental treatment (1 session)

• Lower costs

• Maybe more side effects with FLASH-Radiotherapy, because it`s still experimental

• General anesthesia- and radiotherapy-risks (discussed individually)

Treatment schedule

Conventional Radiotherapy FLASH-Radiotherapy

Treatment will be allocated randomly (by chance)

5 days total hospital stay at the Tierspital Zurich • Radiotherapy with the linear accelerator

at the Tierspital Zurich • Radiotherapy duration 1-2 Min;

2x daily, 5 consecutive days

• Ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (100x faster) with FLASH-RT prototype, CHUV Lausanne

• Radiotherapy duration <1 Sec; only 1 unit of radiotherapy

Follow-ups: after 2, 4, 6 weeks and after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 months

Goals of the project

• Compare treatment outcome after 10 conventional vs. 1 FLASH-session • Future improvement of radiotherapy with fewer treatments / anesthesias • Comparability of the side effects of both treatments • Cancer research – translation to human medicine

Page 2: Conventional Radiotherapy vs. FLASH-Radiotherapy Cancer ... · with FLASH-RT prototype, CHUV Lausanne • Radiotherapy duration

Division of R

adiation Oncology

Page 1

Brönnimann, „M

uschti“R

T conv. January2019

0 weeks

preR

T0 w

eekspostR

T2 w

eekspostR

T4 w

eekspostR

T

6 weeks

postRT

3 months

postRT

Page 3: Conventional Radiotherapy vs. FLASH-Radiotherapy Cancer ... · with FLASH-RT prototype, CHUV Lausanne • Radiotherapy duration

Division of R

adiation Oncology

„Sämi“

FLASH-R

T June 2019

0 weeks

preR

T0 w

eekspostR

T4 days

postRT

11 dayspostR

T

2 weeks

postRT

2 weeks

postRT