consti cases review

Upload: rhoan-iraya-hiponia

Post on 05-Jul-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    1/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    2/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    3/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    4/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    5/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    6/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    7/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    8/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    9/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    10/227

    http://lawsandfound.blogspot.com/2012/11/pvta-v-cir-digest.htmlhttp://lawsandfound.blogspot.com/2012/11/bacani-v-nacoco-digest.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    11/227

    http://lawsandfound.blogspot.com/2012/11/government-v-monte-de-piedad-digest.htmlhttp://xyckriz.blogspot.com/2010/11/co-kim-chan-vs-valdez-tan-keh.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    12/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    13/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    14/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    15/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    16/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    17/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    18/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    19/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1968/ra_5446_1968.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    20/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    21/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    22/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2009/ra_9522_2009.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    23/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    24/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    25/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    26/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    27/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    28/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    29/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    30/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    31/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    32/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1961/ra_3046_1961.htmlhttp://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1968/ra_5446_1968.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    33/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    34/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    35/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    36/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    37/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    38/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1991/ra_7160_1991.htmlhttp://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1991/ra_7160_1991.htmlhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote1symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote2symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote3symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote4symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote5symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote6symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote7symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote8symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote9sym

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    39/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote10symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote11symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote12symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote13symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote14symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote15symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote16symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote17symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote18sym

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    40/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote19symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote20symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote21symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote22symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote23symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote24symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote25symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote26sym

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    41/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote27symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote28symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote29sym

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    42/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote30symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote31symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote32symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote33symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote34symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote35symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote36symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote37sym

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    43/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote38symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote39symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote40symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote41symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote42symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote43symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote44symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote45symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote46symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote47symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote48symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote49symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote50symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote51symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote52sym

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    44/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote53symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote54symhttp://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html#sdfootnote55sym

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    45/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    46/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    47/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    48/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    49/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    50/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    51/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    52/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    53/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    54/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    55/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    56/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    57/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn1http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn2http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn3http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn4http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn5http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn6http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn7

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    58/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn8http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn9http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn10http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn11http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn13http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn14

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    59/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn16

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    60/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn18

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    61/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn20

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    62/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn22

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    63/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn23http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn24

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    64/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn25http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn26http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn27http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/dec2000/100388.htm#_edn28

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    65/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    66/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn1http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn2

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    67/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn3http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn4http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn5http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn6

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    68/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn7http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn8http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn9

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    69/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn10http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn11

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    70/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn13http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn14http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn15

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    71/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn16http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn18http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn20http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn22

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    72/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn23http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn24http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn25http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn26http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn27http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn28http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn29http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/180564_bersamin.htm#_ftn30

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    73/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    74/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    75/227

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/46579223/Veterans-Manpower-and-Protective-Services

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    76/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    77/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    78/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    79/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    80/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    81/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    82/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    83/227

    http://cofferette.blogspot.com/2009/01/amigable-vs-cuenca-43-scra-360-gr-no-l.htmlhttp://cofferette.blogspot.com/search/label/Case%20Digestshttp://cofferette.blogspot.com/search/label/Political%20Law

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    84/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    85/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    86/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    87/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    88/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    89/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    90/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    91/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    92/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    93/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    94/227

    http://digestyourlaw.blogspot.com/2010/01/municipality-of-makati-vs-court-of.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    95/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    96/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    97/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    98/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    99/227

    http://piusmorados.wordpress.com/author/piusmorados/http://piusmorados.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/jose-almeda-vs-court-of-appeals-digested/

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    100/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    101/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    102/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    103/227

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/262/390#writing-USSC_CR_0262_0390_ZShttp://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/262/390#writing-USSC_CR_0262_0390_ZOhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/262/390#writing-ZS

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    104/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    105/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    106/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    107/227

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/268/510/case.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    108/227

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/262/390/case.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    109/227

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/203/243/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/203/243/case.html#255https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/204/359/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/204/359/case.html#363https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/239/33/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/257/312/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/263/197/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/211/45/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/245/229/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/254/443/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/254/443/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/257/184/case.htmlhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/262/404/case.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    110/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    111/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    112/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    113/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    114/227

    http://lexislove.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/laguna-lake-development-authority-vs-court-of-appeals/

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    115/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    116/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    117/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    118/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    119/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    120/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    121/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    122/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    123/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    124/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    125/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    126/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    127/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    128/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    129/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    130/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    131/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    132/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    133/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    134/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    135/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    136/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    137/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    138/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    139/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    140/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    141/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    142/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    143/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    144/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    145/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    146/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    147/227

    http://coffeeafficionado.blogspot.com/2012/02/tablarin-vs-gutierrez-gr-no-78164-july.htmlhttp://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt1http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt2

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    148/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt3http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt4http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt5http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt6http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt7http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt8http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt9http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt10http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt11http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt12http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt13

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    149/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt14http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt15http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt16

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    150/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt17http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt18http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt19http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt20

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    151/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt21http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt22http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt23http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt24http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt25

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    152/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt26http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_165299_2009.html#fnt27

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    153/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    154/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    155/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    156/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    157/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    158/227

    http://piusmorados.wordpress.com/author/piusmorados/http://piusmorados.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/veterans-federation-party-vs-comelec-digested/

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    159/227

    http://nonamalum.weebly.com/1/post/2010/07/bagong-bayani-labor-party-v-comelec-gr-no-147589-june-26-2001.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    160/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    161/227

    http://coffeeafficionado.blogspot.com/2012/02/banat-vs-comelec-gr-17927-april-21-2009.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    162/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    163/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    164/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    165/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    166/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    167/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    168/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    169/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    170/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    171/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    172/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    173/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    174/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    175/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    176/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn2http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn3http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn4http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn5http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn6http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn7

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    177/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn8http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn9

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    178/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn10http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn11http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn13http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn14http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn16http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn18

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    179/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn20http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/august2009/7399.htm#_ftn22

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    180/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    181/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    182/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    183/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    184/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn1http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn2http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn3

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    185/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn4http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn5http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn6http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn7http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn8http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn9http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn10http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn11http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn13http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn14http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn16

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    186/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn18http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn20http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn21

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    187/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    188/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn40http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn41http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn42http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn43http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn44http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn45http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn46http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn47http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn48http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/aug1997/127255.htm#_edn49

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    189/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    190/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt1

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    191/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt2http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt3

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    192/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt4http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt5http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt6http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt7http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt8http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt9http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt10http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt11http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt12http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt13http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt14http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt15http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt16http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt17http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt18http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt19

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    193/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt20http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt21http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt22http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt23

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    194/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    195/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt24http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt25http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt26http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt27http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt28http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt29http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt30http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt31http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt32http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt33http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt34

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    196/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt35http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt36http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt37http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt38http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt39http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt40

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    197/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt41

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    198/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt42http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt43http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt44http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt45

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    199/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt46http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt47http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt48

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    200/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    201/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt50http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/mar2008/gr_178413_2008.html#fnt51http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt1http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt2

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    202/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt3http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt4http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt5

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    203/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt6http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt7http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt8http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt9http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_189466_2010.html#fnt10

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    204/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt1http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt2http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt3http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt4http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt5http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt6http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt7http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt8http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt9http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt10http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt11http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt12http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt13http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt14http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt15http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt16http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt17http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt18

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    205/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt19http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt20http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt21http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt22http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt23http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt24http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt25http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt26http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt27http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt28http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt29http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt30http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt31http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt32http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt33http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt34http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt35http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt36http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt37http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt38http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt39http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt40

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    206/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt41http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt42http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt43

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    207/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt44http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt45http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt46http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt47http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt48

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    208/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt49

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    209/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_191998_2010.html#fnt50http://lawsandfound.blogspot.com/2012/09/coseteng-v-mitra-gr-no-86649-digest.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    210/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    211/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    212/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    213/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt1http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt2http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt3http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt4http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt5http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt6http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt7http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt8http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt9http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt10http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt11

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    214/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt12http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt13http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt14http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt15http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt16http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt17http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt18http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt19http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt20http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt21

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    215/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt22http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt23http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt24http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt25http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt26http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt27http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt28http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt29http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt30

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    216/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt31http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt32http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt33http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt34http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt35http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt36http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt37http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt38http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt39http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt40

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    217/227

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt41http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt42http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_180055_2009.html#fnt43http://lawsandfound.blogspot.com/2012/11/bengzon-v-senate-blue-ribbon-committee.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    218/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    219/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    220/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn1

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    221/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn2http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn3http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn4http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn5http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn6http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn7http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn8http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn9

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    222/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn10http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn11http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn13http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn14http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn16http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn18

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    223/227

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn20http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn22http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/174105.htm#_ftn23

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    224/227

    http://coffeeafficionado.blogspot.com/2012/04/garcia-vs-mata.html

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    225/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    226/227

  • 8/15/2019 Consti Cases Review

    227/227