-1-fq 31/0//)

/14,11 cb-yox--.4

All IsG, Dte Gen/ Ftr HQ/Zone, ITB Police. All SHQrs, ITB Police.. The AC, IT Cell, Dte Gen, ITBP alongwith modified APAR format of legal cadre officers for uploading on ITBP website.

1 2

Distributions:-

nspector Viral (Pers)

Confidential Directorate General, ITB Police Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI

Block No.II,CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi-03

No.I -17015/(7)/ITBP/2012/APAR Cel1-33g Dated: 1,? 51 3-

Corrigendum

The following modification in partial to this office Circular No.I-17015/07/2012/APAR Cell/1043 dated 26/10/2015 is made :- APAR Part and para No. PART IV (II)

PART V

PART VI

For

Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in part 4 of the Report. (A+B+C) Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in Part IV-A (A+B+C) of the Report. Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in Part - 4 of the Report

Read

Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in part 4 (I) (A+B+C) of the Report. Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in Part V (A+B+C) of the Report. Overall grading- On a score of 1-10. On the basis of weightage given in Part 4 & 5 of the Report.

2 In view of above, a modified APAR format of legal cadre Officers (AC to DIG) is enclosed herewith for further necessary action by all concerned.

Encl: as above.

Accepting Authorities ii R-4- t Name & Designation cnizi u Period worked

11 4-1141 iv l Reporting Authority vewr-tt Reviewing Authority

14Acol Accepting Authority

r. INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORC 4 PAHA

GOVT. OF INDIA

(flviti arftrwrItM ct) Reqlq•-1 1e4-114”1 Mr 4-I) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (APAR) OF GAZETTED OFFICERS

(flIqc-1) tf9T4t fq) (For Assistant Commandant to Dy. Inspector General (LEGAL)

ITFT —1 Part—I cict,mr't 31--4R 1- 11,-114-r tc-z4141-r 4-1

APAR for the period from to

1. r 1111-1 Name of the officer

2. 4c1 Regt. No.

3 1t€r Date of birth

4. tai-pT- til4qic11 Educational qualification

5. qdliTff • Present grade

6. q41iF riq Present post

7. qthfl-- 1T4 fkz:Ifrci FA- Date of appointment to present post

8. eat47, T-114Act)-1 3117 6.4-t-8817 CrefWitt Reporting, Reviewing and

9. toy/eft ffur -cr7 3T-44 Period of absence on leave/ training, etc.

al-q-fr Period uwuf1 Remarks

trR- On leave t-R On training

10. 31--d-rt/er9-7(4-1c-zlico-i Awards/Honours (assessment year)

1 1 . Tifta<91 yl 14 -r 3itrwrtf f•-r fera- .c'tciiI ch ch I 0-114'1 V.11 c1)-1 ci

f4gt +ii fa-4--- Tr Details of APARs of personnel not written by the officer as reporting/ reviewing authority for the previous year

12. Ri4-‘si 39-rcrit 13-d-4 ffi-14 Date of filing Annual Property Return for the year ending December

13. 1 1bcdI vlizf l -M-f0- Date of medical examination (Attach copy of the medical report)

.4-117-2 Part — H 1 -k1 31-14Wft MW 4-1 e6-€1-r .11-11 t, 311

To be filled in by the officer reported upon

1̀1. c1<N 3TRWFtf I<I 14,q cvi4 \ffiT1 fur 71 ft 300 YI6qI

9ef •1 -rit.q Trfft?I. fur R4 TR wFf t uliq coli 31-ft-ftr at 9-r coq ,riiq Brief description of duties of the officer reported upon during the period from to not exceeding 300 words. Brief resume to be confined in the space allotted and no additional sheet allowed.

2. 4114 3-0TZT EZ)zi 3TR9- tc“.1 311:14 f f9wfltd- zrr 31rcr* f4srf-Pw f$7:1 Tr?

Trr 3744 wur 1)) wrzr1 31TU-4 9-rzrfilw-d-r 3TRIN 'ER 61 -Hq 3N *F4,7 3174t

31:EdfrcT I (3q161 fq 31-rcr i;r3i-rrr fq 1c cif t79-r) Please specify targets/objectives/goals (in quantitative or other terms) of work you set for yourself or that were set for you, eight to ten items or work in the order of priority and your achievement against each target. (Example: Annual Action Plan for your Division)

wifffrazil Achievements (1444/304zI/ t-424 Targets/Objectives/Goals

:: 3 ::

3. 'Th710=r0- 2 4 w-dt7 Ti7 -a.a.-74/ -u-qtzziValzftt Vl-ftf bc)- Th--Przll -0E-11 c.0 I LI 4 VT-ICT 4 co

qiz.Trq ,cg)t -- t .qd-rq Please state briefly, the shortfalls with reference to the targets/objectives/goals referred to in item 2. Please specify constraints, if any, in achieving the targets.

Date

4. 11T 4-1q . TT lit wrcb`l. 3114- Q 3t39-4 311:14 24)+1<I-1 Please also indicate items in which there have been significantly higher achievements and your contribution thereto.

I-171-3 PART—III 1X-4-ltd 014 1- 11141‹.-1 itc18

DEMONSTRATIVE PERFORMANCE REPORT

-urtcR, (AIA/ATI, CIPHER, MT.)

1. ftraToil tth: Standard achieved during inspection

BPET:-Qualified/Not qualified 2. t.t.t. 3-dT 3. 7.3TR.tt.T44. Fail 31--Tdigt ARCF:MM,FC,SS

the job training of men -e4-71- 4 Tiiizt uil6f afq(qT

Interest taken in organizing on during collective training. -NT 5. 31 ,c-ck Standard achieved

-4-7T 6 -Ffkd F4 Details of Pending Court Cases

=i1. cOkul, 3ITR It Reason of pendency, if

any

u < ftzrd- Th-\3=11 ql•fl-t 1I4c.I Tr4 u < \-N.s241 Total No. of court cases pending during the year

ail (.4) No. of court cases disposed off during the year

-.Rc.zo No. of court cases pending during the year

3110Th-Tt Signature of Officer

4 IITIT —4 PART — IV (I)

11fM‹.-1/T-1 cb-r mi col Tvr ASSESSMENT BY REPORTING/REVIEVING AUTHORItY

0,110,0,1 1-TtRuf eat<ff "0-1T Tflefir 11- ct)Pa 51 1fIII uu-if 1-10 tR 61ir W+1 *ft Tr 2..1T 10 sAuft aiT 3cr cMt-11 t I Numerical grading is to be awarded by reporting and reviewing authority which should be on a scale of 1-10, where 1 refers to the lowest grade and 10 to the highest.

(Tzrr trfttuEr1 It-i44*(.1 f4xir fl--4711 larm (Please read carefully the guidelines before filling the entries)

(3T) 01 it1-114-1 i r Vi414).1 (*.N FR 40% 6 +11 )

(A) Assessment of work output (weightage to this Section would be 40%. )

\vi vritt<ff AiItnift Admn. Reporting Reporting Authority.

\vi 191d'reni Al oat Admn. Reviewing Authority

\v{ 111101)1 f1 $ ant497 Admn. Initial of Reviewing Auth.

i. li zi iti 444 t Itcptdr/ qtio t 3T1ETR IR 3Treo DR11 TIT 014

Accomplishment of planned work/ work allotted as per subjects allotted.

ii. 4+14itc1T49. -Aft Quality of output

iii. quilt-110 trzEd1 Analytical ability

-A iv. 37 -114-4-14 4)14 It /f4)4 T17 31Tairitff 4)14 Accomplishment of exceptional

work/ unforeseen tasks performed fkTi"ii col IF 4•,),c4 ftd-W 46f1T-VE Overall Grading on 'Work output'. = (Total Score ± 4 X 0.4)

(4). 024 4 1c1 ft 1.EclT3T1 Tr toi114)-1 (*•(-1 'FFT r FR 30% 6)+11 )

(B) Assessment of personal attributes (weightage to this Section would be 30%)

Rvi 111 4-1111 OA Admn. Reporting Authority.

Wii-itar9 IIIl cot Admn. Reviewing Authority

wi to'w vitim-rt * 31TEIW Admn. Initial of Reviewing Auth.

i. coi .°1 31-Rqit Attitude to work

ii. qi MI 4tT Sense of responsibility

iii. 3TTifffiff TE 3TIR1 E Maintenance of Discipline

iv. i-Itiuf BTr19i Tt. Communication skills

v. .)qc-ci 7 Leadership qualities vi. mct ITiqffi A cniti c t &war

Capacity to work in team spirit vii. 11414 Wffuft w 31-gRuT 4.),t.) ThcT &NM

Capacity to work in time limit viii. wiTH aiRcpla #49.

Inter-personal relations ciaci+Ri itAE1T3i1 IR ctrf fka-W 3A•uftwRiir Overall Grading on personal attributes = (Total Score 8 X 0.3)

:: 5 :: (RR) slch ic-41 MT 1,re-1107-1 (*,4-1. ITT 7 ERR 30: 611)

(C) Assessment of functional competency__ wei hta e to this Section would be 30%)

Authority.

ii ied-k--9 AT TAT Admn. Reporting

Wi T-I ci cP-I liAchi

Admn. Reviewing Authority

41 T-I d co-f Cgr- 3mw Admn. Initial of Reviewing Auth.

i. f441#/faftzrt/ (pi 74 trzr-d-r &.)- A gf -trr7 74 i-i, ‘gigl vz1)-Tr i ,ii-Kbil Knowledge of Rules/Regulations/ Procedures in the area of function and ability to apply them correctly.

`1. ii. Afird-o-q 479-r E-ii &im Strategic planning ability

iii. fiuizi c)4 4-TErffr Decision making ability

iv. \941-utl &-iliffl Coordination ability

_

v) 31t9721 MA r -d cm4 74 f4---ftd cp al TIT Ability to motivate and develop subordinates

AM-RIit-TIM TaiT1M TR ct)ef ftruw 5510frwzirr Overall Grading on functional competency = (Total Score ± 5 X 0.3)

2. qftrucrr Training (cqqz41 Ntrwt ;TArftm colei a-TAm311 31sYi 3TfTTR 3T17 ct) i.1 \3•4-I ct, vitefur

1) (Please give recommendations for training with a view to further improving the effectiveness and

capabilities of the officer)

3. *GI 0.24 4 RQ.It. State of health

4. 3TRI-M-Ttt ICI 3314M-ft chr) tioi3T1 4 1 (wpm— 100 yr4 A), 'f -TrA •t11+124 LU )+-1

\914izzi 313-{RTFur •ucr-614.Tzri, flt-nc.ici a 74 wrfAF Pen picture by reporting officer (in about 100 words) on the overall qualities of the officer including area of strengths and lesser strength, extraordinary achievements, significant failures and attitude towards

weaker sections.

5 ftEltdzit9. 3TRIWitt 3Tgfta. Wit/ 31-17-ftd ‘31-1u10 74 \94-1Ivr qzfi

uzir cP14i 3-RiTht TiTNT 3N Twig m-r F4-43-ffr Specific comments on the attitude of the officer reported upon towards Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Weaker Sections of the Society, his understanding and his willingness to deal with them.

:: 6 ::

6. ticzli*d1 Integrity

(clzwr 31.RwIt met i-iof*ar trR (Please comments on the integrity of the officer)

7. .w 16 -I 'APT-4(1) 3TTE117 cqr1ri I ci) tq4 I &VD ca ctrOJI (3T-Ed-T1)

Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in part -4 (I) of the Report (A+B+C)

141M 4,1 31ftrwrt TiTrraw Signature of Admn. Reporting Authority

9TxT 1147 Name in Block Letters 44-11+1 Designation

%TrTr — 4 PART — IV(II) T4Yr -9 3TEC1 311-ifkf ADMN REMARKS OF THE REVIEWING AUTHORITY

1. 1A.-I cl ch -I 3 f` i 3itiF ..̀ "t T(4.)cir l 31-4f4 Length of service under the Reviewing officer

2. T-I( Act) -1 3Tfitf g NI WaTI U-CAR I cte-1 zi I •-1111 cl) 'El -I cr) . (FTPTrr 100 1.11 #) i -RT4 3Tirwrtt c•61 tI1-1 tcl fdYlgc113T1

mc't i-rxrai a9. 0 co,' Trrival&.) 0 y+rl-*ufc'T3Tf1ccivrrfiTF er 1

Pen Picture by reviewing Officer. Please comment (in about 100 words on the overall qualities of the officer including area of strengths and lesser strength and his attitude towards weaker sections.)

3. fd-qt Thpi 'ti I "ft4-itri "RlitU WRTIT faITT ‘3-11q.

Remarks by the Reviewing Officer to indicate specifically the differences, if any, with the assessment made by the Reporting Officer, and the reasons therefore.

::7::

4. 3110-wrqt c itt-8 t ci6 oar

f+--zrr ,y1 clq.11 itt8 fR3-. clic) r ‘3\'1 317ifft-

-rfa- /31-o7o -ro 31t1M-rtt 014 VIcic11 it fW-Tur aft R- Vet t

If the officer reported upon is a member of SC/ST please indicate specifically whether the attitude of the Reporting officer in assessing the performance of the SC/ST has been fair & just.

5. AFT-4(1) A Rq 4-TRiTT 3r1~117 cF rilcON tN-ce-1101c1.)

cl 1110 °I (31-1--Fi) Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in Part- 4 (I) of the Report. (A+B+C)

4-E ch-f tWffel7

Signature of the Admn Reviewing Authority •(-1It-t) Nait

Name in Block Letters 44-1141 Designation

Part-V (To be filled by Technical Reviewing Authortiy)

1 (A) Assessment of work output /professional competency (weightage to this section would be 40%)

Authority Technical Reviewing Initial of Technical

Authority 1:1- i. 1 q Do cniel mifi trftkofid-r/ f o 3114R

311feT f+-zrr TT co14 Accomplishment of planned work/ work

allotted as per subjects allotted. ii. X14 ftEcriTi 4 -4-ft Quality of output iii. tiumoto znTzrdi Analytical ability

iv. Intelligence and Output v. Attention paid toward: a) Court case b) NHRC case c) NGOs d) Legal advise to various service matters vi) Presentation of Court cases and other cases vii) Knowledge of Rules, Codes, Manuals, Instructions & procedure viii) Capacity to advise legal matters and promptness in disposal of work ix) Pursuing and monitoring the matters of the JAG Branch/place of Posting x) Quality of scrutiny and drafting xi) Command on the legal terminology & English language _ Total Score (X) Average Score= X/11= Y Weightage 40% = Yx0.4=A

::8:: (b)Assessment of personal attributes (weightage to this Section would be 30%)

Technical Reviewing Initial of Technic Authority I Reviewing Authority

i. Attitude to work ii Professional ethics

iii. Inter personal relationships

iv. Presence of mind and professional matters v. Sobriety, maturity &

confidence in

amenability to discipline vi. Intellectual honesty, creativity and innovative qualities vii. Intelligence, tact, courtesy and self confidence in professional matters viii. Ability to work in a team. ix. Ability to search case law and research x. Compilation and development of the latest Judgment, now legal development and updated legal knowledge Total Score (X) Average Score= X/10= Y Weightage 30% = Yx0.3=B

(C) Assessment of functional competency in professional matters (weightage to this

Section would be 30%)

i. Knowledge of rules/ Acts/codes/ regulations/procedures in the area of function and ability to apply correctly. ii. Coordination ability

iii. Strategic Planning ability iv. Decision making ability

v. Ability to motivate and develop subordinates

Total Score (X) Average Score= X/6=Y Weightage 30%=-Yx0.3=C

2. Attitude of the officer towards Women, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Weaker

Section of the Society, his understanding and willingness to deal with them.

3. Professional Ethics

Technical Reviewing Initial of Technical Authority Reviewing Authority

: :9:

4. PEN-PICTURE OF THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON BY TECHNICAL REVIEWING AUTHORITY

The Technical Reviewing Officer is required to indicate whether he agrees with resume of work as indicated by the officer, his comments on the overall qualities of the officer including areas of strength and lesser strength and his attitude towards the weaker section.

5. Overall numerical grading on the basis of Weightage given in Part-V(A+B+C) of the report On a score of 1-10(A+B+C)

Place: Date:

•41-Fr-6 PART-VI

ctro clic) 31-Rwrtr REMARKS OF THE COUNTERSIGNING/ACCEPTING AUTHORITY

(3P-11-1 317TM -cc{ 311 -Tt / (i.e. Next Superior Officer)

1. ctlI 31T14(4 0)-1 31f4WR't aR 31-Prz( r ,6 4-1c1 t

Do you agree with the remarks of the reporting/reviewing authorities?

2. -ef fo-Rur Trro coNui itar iii Comments on the remarks of the reporting/reviewing authority and details of difference of opinion, if any, with reasons for the same.

3. 'W54,11014) TEbt- 1 R4 10 CIO

7-1PT-4 5 -4 7-1Rt7T &MR. TR ctj,d d I ct) k I

Overall numerical grading- On a score of 1-10 On the basis of weightage given in Part- 4 & 5 of the Report.

.~r 6tola-R Signature of Countersigning Authority

3TaT4 Name in Block Letters

q.-tp-i Designation

Signature of Technical Reviewing Authortiy (Name in Block letters and Designation)

titrr grft . f3t-8

1(.)

Guidelines re • ardinl us of APARs with numerical • adinl

1. (q) m—rzt f4tscn- 1'40-8 A itq TR trzilwr i:Frzr arn-c& -cr4 wi-4tut

I The columns in the APAR should be filled with due care and attention and after devoting

adequate time.

(ITEOzig 31t-TT Mt Wtt f 1 3Ter4T 2 Mpt f (M-1-11 3T1-3-ZF 3T2T4T IFT ZIT 14,1 far TIZ

f4EFFUT311 TRT 49.-tTER 14 'PIM :r171#Td fi44. f0zIT W\T1TT 311 Tit 1;IThR, 9 3P-4-4T 10 0 WI

T ffs 11Z 31:1-"Tzt TNET A :]rizrfilm itr-4 itzfT u1iN+1 I 1-2 3121-qT 9-10 0.4 3-afrq

31TITEriuT 'Ofkg Atm ft-4 m-TA mr2t 3E--4-zzrwm t►Rck8 fo-R31A qrA- tur w- A. "qT

qff-traTur garwrt) gas c tp-io 6'r-c 1 1 -4-49-F A 3TcrA 3101F -fzkff

wlq-rftzft 2̀t w9-R4-carr It is expected that any grading of 1 or 2 (against work output or attributes or overall grade) would be adequately justified in the pen-picture by way of specific failures and similarly, any grade of 9 or 10 would be justified with respect to specific accomplishments. Grades of 1-2 or 9-10 are expected to be rare occurrences and hence the need to justify them. In awarding a numerical grade the reporting and reviewing authorities should rate the officer against a larger population of his/her peers that may be

currently working under them.

(1:172NA qi-fit co 14 fAlEttr-47 itz[1-8 fil4 8 10 litzf 9 "Cra9. itq t, 3W,7" 11T9T

ITT 3117 49--F/ITit 3ti:M 310 +luI-11 zft ft-q 7N-ill I

APARs graded between 8 and 10 will be rated as 'outstanding' and will be given a score of 9 for the purpose of calculating average scores for empanelment/Promotion.

(1T3) t#1 qrfft 1,414-1 6 8tf TIZZI V-4-M Trq

"qp 31-51" 11T9T WTTT 311- 3t 7 3f APARs graded between 6 and short of 8 will be rated as 'very good' and will be given a score of 7.

(T) tit qffit- fA13:1-R9. ftE1)-8 f914 4 6, 6 tf iitzt •cr-4•-F 'Wq t "31651""

1:1T9T 31,1 3.4 5 3is- -1.4q APARs graded between 4 and 6 short of 6 will be rated as 'good' and given a score of 5.

(31-c) r fAlErrq TLFTiw9' f448 4 t gas1A--4m -f4 Trq t 1-qL-R=T afT ftzfr -rvrrr

APARs grade below 4 will be given a score of zero.

2. itt8 fosf-A "qf 3d4Wft Th)- qraT Th-rOi zt. ftqfa. A ITR-9-r wrftq 7-41t itte-M9

31Rrwr1 zszktt ,r11 qt 79. 'Ulzf- 31111 tr I The column relating to "Public Relations" need to be filled in by t members

he Reping officer only where the

duties of the officer reported upon are such that he comes in contact with s of the public.

3. fir ARA A -119-fktm 379-r4 7r-4'r w1tR The following procedure should be followed in filling up the column relating to integrity.

i) Erd4att 3arCti 'titer 31zt TiERW4 :{1111--iT1171 7r9T

3019-4K TF-41'41ZT GIR 14 "MTZ1 04 ciA 311- faii-Fftzi d

trR. AtAzT -r-t4r4 3T2T-d-r ifk-e WTIT8T tru f$-Trr Niq-i

ftE9 fat 8-0.3r TrA-4, izrt arm A - urr 3ftq vrffIft #et m-r6-9- ARA

zErthrr f Tr ,AN Izift wr-6-ff 31-Estz f+-FT tzrzi wrTur .9-et lwr t

31-gf1 3171 wit-14 -er Supervisory officer should maintain a

which instances which create suspicion

about the integrity of a subordinate should be noted from time to time and action to verify the truth of such suspicion should be taken expeditiously by making confidential ti eme

nquiries of recording

departmental the ly Annual

r by

referring the matter to the Special Police Establishment. At the Performance Assessment Report, this diary should be consulted and the material in it utilized for filling in the column relating to integrity. If the colum not n is filled on account of the unconfirmed

nature of the suspicions, further action should be taken in accordance with the following sub-

paragraphs.

:: 11 :: t6i coldii cnl zvr-A 1-s5)71- 3frq ch I *ic-411*61 GO 14 Ylcf)

311-q 31—d7 tr-c1 .11 t k cb TiT2Tc 1 it-4T \ Y1 N 3TYR. 31-W1 ct)1441 -1I I The column pertaining to integrity in the Character Roll should be left blank and a separate secret note about the doubts and suspicions regarding the Government servants integrity should be recorded simultaneously and followed up.

iii) ct:)c) g tt I GO 14 Yle-f 0-1 qv! /plc / t

chi,) tit9c1It9 m t 1Mz.1 chl fl4-11,-c-1 c 31.24-T TflThc.1 f7 trzri-c T{FeTr

mcut * I , -Nctu,a X14cr) 3Twor TR 31-14 3W10 -1,,1,t Ter 7

T41- =4, , 6i cla:ra-01 A-, viz 4,0T4F'd-cr 61.) 31-aTF f 41(4 71-r

•,-11 There may be cases in which after a secret report/note has been recorded expressing suspicion about a Government servant's integrity, the inquiries that follow do not disclose sufficient material to remove the suspicion or to confirm it. In such a case, the Government servant's conduct should be watched for a further period, and, in the meantime, he should, as far as practicable, be kept away from positions in which there are opportunities for indulging in corrupt practices.

iv) 3T4RR 31-M * \ i ti t .r'31-4 41 cl I 3TRIWit *ci zi 3N. RtlY8 I c.) C1(11 vft

-Lue“-inD •k-lczAt01 W-111.01d 3T2Tqf MDcl?e1 vfaft 31.21-41 TF9T 371-- LIN-1 Or) Tqir

f441-Trrzzre co) 4,1L 1 ItCk8 4rY0) 14 Tilitt CO, 'atct flct)cl I * I '4)' "TN

it-Rtt -WQ,1" . 2119- 4 3,)--4R-ff * 3117 f4-q-1-8 frA- 41 e) 3Tftwrtt col .3tict, ctu4 T1Z f4w-d -R3rA 31-4R17

.1b51 21 3T2T-qr 6161 •wctu , A -ftcft8 f cue) 3TRWitf t16t1 44c,1 Tf-WL?f 3744 f m-P1 f+-zrr

3i2TOT (14-4 T 311it ER. 61 t" I 1:1711 14, fcr)-8f cl I c4 31-flUTTftcnl .4-Ic-q i*O1 c i ch I (-14-1 Tl

6111 14 ';fftfic R it \I fl cP I 'a cich 4o14 Tp EgrilTr fl,v4 f •-ww -R-dt

* 46 cc1 ft-L-4qt cils.) 14 .0 4-10 * 31.24-4f f 37f4 •(-N ch I .a cl ct) 4 flCLAtdi 611 A vs

-161 t, ,31,ffl 111 utueu t I LI ct) 2,74711-T 0411 fv i TN cnl 3TT9it -1 TiTh-th t I iTtq

31-1T4TW * 14) ‘3-G4 31i4M-rti -#41-4 3N 3T "WRiR-ff calf *61 GI I Fl Tifqft-ff f' -ufizr e).) w4K1 cm-ii Mit (-16 '1 /444,N1014) .iR3f4 A \9,121

There are occasions when a Reporting Officer cannot in fairness to himself and to the Government servant reported upon, either certify integrity or make an adverse entry or even be in possession of any information which would enable him to make a secret report to the Head of the Department. Such instances can occur when a Government servant is serving in a remote station and the Reporting Officer has not had occasion to watch his work closely or when a Government servant has worked under the Reporting Officer only for brief period or has been on long leave etc. In all such cases, the Reporting Officer should make an entry in the integrity column to the effect that he has not watched the Government servant's work for sufficient time to be able to make any definite remark or that he has heard nothing against to the Government servant's integrity, as the case may be . This would be a factual statement to which there can be no objection. But it is necessary that a superior officer should make every effort to form a definite judgement about the integrity of those working under him, as early as possible, so that he may be able to make a positive statement.

~c chi ffiliTTT it-9"t-t 20 414., 1972 IT -TO 1T0 740 51/5/72—WIN")

(Department of Personnel O.M. No 51/5/72-Estt. 'A' dated 20th May, 1972.)

v) Ri918 i'c4 41c13TIWWitt g •tic-zlitd1 4> c.11-1 TITIT4 (I) f4W-et 14 tiViet farr u :—

The remarks against the integrity column shall be made by the reporting officer in one the three

options mentioned below:-

i(t)1 tr31 Beyond doubt 3TRIWt it •1 cz-1 r*61 Rtit-TZT *, 3M: 4.141 t t1 ei4-1 * I

Since the integrity of the officer is doubtful, a secret note is attached. fr3r.ict "ftufzi (4-) fq 3Tf T 1 col4 u1 trztlir f1,14.1 RTst t

tr-41 3TRn-r-q1 6117 4 ct,) m(1c c,ei f4-48 -161 tt 1 t Not watched the officer's work for sufficient time to form a definite judgement but nothing adverse has been reported to me about the officer

i) ii)

": 12 ::

(vi) 31-RrWrt fir 3T-4'4w-1' t f-zrr -19r wit-q

If the officer's integrity is beyond doubt, it may be so stated.

(vii) 4)14 Ttkg Th-ralT ‘914 R441 wir 34'Y f419f-ditru m-r-4-4rt

If there is any doubt or suspicion, the column should be left blank and action

taken as under:

() \q) 3ra9 &Eft Acrtz( fttcroft fdt 31173tTicR rt41 wR1 .3cto itozroft i;rf

7ftertzr ftt-8 WrzT \i-ccf 3TRI-Wrtt Lik-r 4-A vtiq 6410 ,1-fAfm .m1Trr 3T-T-4-61

r- 4rt 3TraFRT t qfZ f4tw vffrl ff itr ctr0 11 3T21-4T *Er-4m ftctrut t94 tr -

ft0-8

31-Rwrt A-rd (WL.11 Witq Zif 3-TA /1~ Ita)-ziEft9 3TRrwrt

3Tqfr oct) mtt fAirt-4-d fA-utzt Trw-dr T4--4Rm 3TRWIt ct"))4 ftWrzfff

(a)

A separate secret note should be recorded and followed up. A copy of the note should also be sent -161 friA together with the Confidential Report to the next superior officer who will ensure that the follow up action is taken expeditiously. Where it is not possible either to certify the integrity or to record the secret note, the Reporting officer should state either that he has not watched the officer's work for sufficient time to form a definite judgment or that he has heard nothing against the officer, as the case

may be.

(U) 24 3T-T4ffi wi -4T4 ziNTITPWW4 124) TNtrwrt mt fir fi sfrUF In fear 7r9T

Wit-R U-<-1-eR 1ftf4171. Tiret of ft 7r4t wIt-q

(b) If as a result of the follow-up action the doubts or suspicions are cleared the officer's integrity should be certified and an entry made accordingly in the Confidential Report.

(9) zrft Titg 11-4). 71-4 **I 6410 Th-T fkzrr wPR 3t17 Tizrer Tom t-44-d

31-Ftwr f“1" writ-q

(C)

If the doubts or suspicions are confirmed, this fact should also be recorded and duly communicated to

the officer concerned.

(1ET) 24 31-Tedt r trfturFr-rFcr zrr 9 —gq 311-R• ti traz ctp 3tY \91-1LI cl Et)

"TORM 3TitnTtt 31Wilf tR f ,N1..11 Tat wrItq 3117 os,-1, 1 ,0 zcrztor (() (9)

wr ~l(d)

If as a result of the follow-up action the doubts or suspicions are neither cleared not confirmed the -rft

officer's conduct should be watched for a further period and thereafter action taken as indicated at (b)

and (c) above. * * *

•NT ft-4M # IR-414 7 Tit gm "tcrctocir virtff

41-nr, T ft-A-15 ftd-C 2017:-1-4 7 Tilt R1-6- Iii Ta ftqff 31#11 cifTrgf 3171)--d- T-RWT 14 +16 "-ci-cuot tr fir" 31-147-q

vi-NIT f5T lRf-6- *1 9(113TPRIF TO-Pi 14 ffl:#-J 61k) p co 6i #TqtzT wr#14-4t ▪ 31179. -cle1 197d 31it1T9. 61ei tiq.gciii 15 Rit4R- 2017 34 TIV wtdt 3T 241a 02 31-1W 2017 c1c1) 31TzlIftff I 311.- 1F. 4-i*e1c4 ..01 Tit 070 0T4,0 .F4 cP 311tr1T ▪ d) tfR. tat col 4411 .31 -t-6. 4 31-q-R:R (-N -t--g-t-1 col , .cittocii vA21- itF-41--i

2. 3l 370T0 41$111ct), 311-4.t.411.ti. 31*1-9- 73TTU f47 3114.a.t.t. TT W19 cP -ro- #ritzT 41.6 ift col .61ffT 31117 aWi f$71-r #4-ffr ft6m 14) 31-FOIL

NAM IMI4Ta 3Tcrt fidg •flIcK1 ffqTT. Ttefl I 3M-R 3F1 4.ftE3 3afTlt 74 ulc111 3-crN.Td' 0I

3. *'fl 314397 IF cid c ---t1U -ci-cucil ZR 3T1vrft-d 51-4719- WiT .g-Fr Nructi ift-d ftzu fleii I

4. f#K 31-Vitt. .$ AT-ritztt 4 T-4.97 $PqR:r t 3fry vis-H1Nfl ''Ci -CUCti 4)1 4 1 ft41.1

fact) VII 1:1141 afbitt, 11T0t0t0

Press release Hon'ble Union Home Minister launches `Swachchhta hi sewa'

cleanliness campaign at ITBP Unit

Tigri camp, New Delhi, 15th September, 2017:- Union Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh today participated in the "Swachchhata Hi Sewa" campaign of Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) at ITBP campus, Tigri, New Delhi. During this cleanliness campaign program, Shri Singh said that this drive has begun from 15th September 2017 and will culminate on Gandhi Jayanti i.e. 2nd October, 2017. MHA & all CAPFs will clean the areas in and around official and other premises. A `Swachchhta pledge' was administered by the Hon'ble Union Home Minister to the Force personnel on this occasion.

2. Sh. R.K. Pachnanda, DG ITBP conveyed his gratitude to the Hon'ble HM and MHA for giving the opportunity to the ITBP for hosting `Swachchhata hi Sewa' campaign program and assured that the Force will participate in the campaign with letter and spirit.

3. A swachchhta demonstration by women ITBP personnel was presented. Theme song created and composed by ITBP personnel on cleanliness was also presented.

4. Hon'ble HM along with senior ITBP officers and Jawans participated in cleanliness drive around the Unit campus.

Vivek Kumar Pandey Public Relations Officer

v6.144:to T fIr et yam Nit art?' e3 &hs Tut, irm0-4, dtanEort firer wit Rd.ww-r. vfterz, Weft Re 2,-dk — llama

sm.-24368oresiVO }`—at a editoritbpZgmail.com