concepts basic quality control

Upload: mahfuzah-mustapha

Post on 04-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Concepts Basic Quality Control

    1/4

    Basic Quality Control Concepts

    Quality control describes the directed use of testing to measure the

    achievement of a specified standard. Quality control is a formal (as in structured, not as in

    wearing-a-tuxedo fancy) use of testing. Quality control is a superset of testing, although it

    often used synonymously with testing. Roughly, you test to see if something is broken, and

    with quality control you set limits that say, in effect, if this particular stuff is broken then

    whatever youre testing fails.

    Yet another way of looking at the difference between testing and quality control is to consider

    the difference between a test as an event and a test as a part of a system. For example, lets

    say our test is the measurement of your ability to assemble a jigsaw puzzle in one hour. We

    test you today, and you complete the puzzle in fifty-eight minutes, so you pass. This seems

    pretty trivial, but say that there is some need in your life requiring you to solve puzzlesquickly: we tested you once, but we must verify that you can meet this weird requirement

    continually over time. The solution is to test you at regular intervals, which will allow us to see

    if you can still be successful when under stress, when you havent slept, when your workload

    is high our quality control approach to this issue says you must finish puzzle in one hour

    or less and we will test this requirement periododically over time. And as a side effect of

    this quality control testing, you might find that you are more likely to improve in your puzzle

    solving skills because of the repeated practice; this is the beginning of a shift to quality

    assurance.

    A structured quality control program becomes necessary when the stakes rise: your site is

    supposed to make money, or communicate a corporate message, or extend a brand, or

    disseminate important information. Quality control also becomes necessary when the team

    grows, or you partner with more companies, or your site gets more visitors. You need quality

    control as soon as it becomes important to prove, through the appearance and functionality

    of your web site, that your site has the legitimacy and professionalism to stand behind its

    message.

    Or, if you prefer the short list, you need to establish a quality control program if:

    you are working as part of a team that is building and/or maintaining a big web site, and your

    responsibility is for testing, quality control, or quality assurance

    you are delivering a site to a customer, i.e., YOU are the contractor

    you are receiving site code from a contractor, agency, or technology partner

    Quality Control | The Test Plan

  • 8/13/2019 Concepts Basic Quality Control

    2/4

    For quality control to be effective, you must test the same things the same way every time

    you test. When you change your tests, your results become inconsistent. You need a test

    plan.

    A test plan is simply a high-level summary of the areas (functionality, elements, regions, etc.)

    you will test, how frequently you will test them, and where in the development or publication

    process you will test them. A test plan also needs an estimate of the duration of testing, and

    statement of any required resources.

    The major phases of a web site need test plans, because the focus and emphasis of testing

    will change over time. Testing a new site in development is very different from testing a site

    that has been up and running for some time. Furthermore, any changes to the website code,

    incremental of major, requires regression test plans.

    Clearly, you need to decide what you will test. Understand your sites mission statement,

    statement of goals, business plan whatever it is called, your site should have a concrete

    explanation of the vision behind its creation and the hoped-for path for its success. If your

    site has no such explicit statement of direction, then the codifying of such a statement should

    be your first goal.

    To help define what you should test, ask yourself these types of questions:

    Why did I make this site? What is the sites purpose?

    What are the business goals, if any, behind this site?

    What has to work for this site to be effective? What

    has to work for this to even function as a web site?

    Who is the audience for this site? Can they use this site?

    What is core functionality offered by this site? Can all

    users at least access this core functionality?

    Use the answers to these questions to decide what needs to be tested,

    then develop your testcases.

    Quality Control | The Importance of Testcases

  • 8/13/2019 Concepts Basic Quality Control

    3/4

    Much quality control testing for a web site involves testing the site-as-a-whole because

    HTML and HTTP must follow certain general protocols, standards, and rules of syntax;

    testing for broad patterns of behavior is a good first step. Most of the following items (on this

    non-all-inclusive list) can be tested with automated tools:

    basic adherence to an HTML DTD (document type definition)

    links are not broken

    links point at correct targets

    adherence to a coding style guide or standard; do graphics have ALT values? do graphics

    have HEIGHT and WIDTH values?

    adherence to a content style guide or standard

    correctness of graphics; does the graphic portray what it is supposed to portray?

    correctness of dynamic content or includes

    application functionality; if your site offers the ability to do

    something, like search or purchase online, does it work?

    basic compatibility; does your site work in all browsers? does it work in browsers that it was

    required to work with?

    basic performance; are the pages within a specified page-weight? does the site workacceptably with slower modem speeds?

    Not all of these areas are easy to test with broad, automated tests. Firing up a link-checker

    wont tell you if your search function is working, or working as it is supposed to. For areas like

    application functionality, you must create specific, individual tests; you must devise scenarios

    based on expected user behavior, scenarios that describe how a user will interact with the

    functionality.

    Use these scenarios to create testcases consisting of the specific steps a user would followto accomplish these scenarios. For example, if a scenario calls for a user to add an item to a

    shopping cart in order to purchase it, your testcase should include every action a user would

    follow to complete the scenario. Yes, this is tedious, but the value is a test that can be

    assigned to inexperienced testers and repeated over and over and over.

    [Learn about types of tests |

    learn more about testcases.]

  • 8/13/2019 Concepts Basic Quality Control

    4/4

    Quality Control | Some Issues to Consider

    The goals you set for your site will have a great deal to do with the kind of site you have.

    Commerce sites have distinctly different requirements than do personal home pages, or even

    corporate presence sites.

    Quality control can be difficult when you find your testing resources limited or overextended.

    You will often find it impossible to test everything, or to verify every link, or to read every

    page for deviations from the style guide. You must develop some consistent testcases to

    check the major problem areas, automating tests if reasonable, and you must develop feel

    for your site as trite as that sounds

    Testing and creating testcases is always a learning experience. As you test and refine your

    testcases you will find a balance between not enough testing and just plain overkill, and

    between extremely detailed testcases and simple spot checks. Im not sure there is a best

    way to do quality control (besides focusing on quality assurance) since every web s ite is

    different, but a target of zero defects is always a good thing; the trick is in revising your

    testcases to continually pinpoint any problem areas.

    The quality control process has the major shortcoming of being reactive

    to problems. Quality control sets the standards for the web site and tests for web

    components that fall below those standards, but does nothing to improve the quality of webcomponents. The strictest testing of the output will not necessarily improve the quality of the

    input this challenge is met by the quality assurance process.