conair v. barbar - complaint

Upload: sarah-burstein

Post on 03-Jun-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    1/103

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

    ORLANDO DIVISION

    CONAIR CORPORATION and

    BABYLISS FACO SPRL,

    Plaintiffs,

    v.

    BARBAR, INC. and DOMINIC BARBAR,

    Defendants.

    CASE No. 6:14-CV-831-ORL-31-TBS

    COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

    AND UNFAIR COMPETITION

    (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DEMANDED)DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Plaintiffs Conair Corporation (Conair) and Babyliss FACO SPRL (Babyliss)

    complain of defendants BARBAR, Inc. (BARBAR) and Dominic Barbar (Mr.

    Barbar)as follows:

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    1. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) because this is anaction for infringement of Conair and Babyliss patent rights and for violation of Section

    43(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). This Court has supplemental

    jurisdiction of Plaintiffs claim under Florida law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a).

    2. Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in Florida and in thisjudicial district and division because they have transacted business here by selling,

    offering to sell or distributing hair care products (the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    and/or the BARBAR 2008 Digital Auto Curling Iron) that violate Conairs and Babylisss

    intellectual property rights, and regularly attending trade fairs in Orlando, Florida. As

    discussed below, this includes BARBARs upcoming attendance at Booth 2451 of the

    Premiere Orlando International Beauty Event scheduled for May 31-June 2, 2014.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    2/103

    2

    3. Venue is proper under the general federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. 1391(d), and under the specific venue provision relating to patent-infringement cases, 28

    U.S.C. 1400(b).

    PARTIES

    4. Conair is a Delaware corporation headquartered in East Windsor, NewJersey, with sales and marketing offices in Stamford, Connecticut. Conair is the exclusive

    licensee and owns all substantial rights in and has standing (without joining the nominal

    legal title owner) to sue for infringement of United States Patent No. 8,607,804, entitled

    Hair Styling Aid(the 804 patent) and 8,651,118, entitled Hair Styling Device(the

    118 patent). Conair holds the exclusive license, including the exclusive right to

    manufacture, market and enforce, from TF3 Limited (Birmingham, England). Conair has

    complied with all terms of its exclusive license, and that exclusive license is currently in

    force.

    5. Babyliss is a subsidiary of Conair, and is organized under the laws ofBelgium. It is headquartered and has offices at 25 avenue lindependence 4020, Wandre

    (Liege), Belgium. Babyliss is the owner and has standing to sue for infringement of

    United States Design Patent D696,456, entitled, Hair Styling Apparatus (the 456

    patent).

    6. BARBAR is a California corporation with U.S. offices at 9663 SantaMonica Blvd., Suite 600, Beverly Hills, California. BARBAR has previously and is

    presently making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing into the U.S. hair

    styling devices that infringe one or more claims of the 804, 118 and 456 patents (the

    patents-in-suit). BARBAR has infringed the patents-in-suit either directly or through

    acts of contributory infringement or inducement in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271.

    7. Mr. Barbar is, on information and belief, a resident of California and themanager, chief executive officer, and owner of BARBAR. Mr. Barbar has previously and

    is presently making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing into the U.S. hair

    styling devices that infringe one or more claims of the 804, 118 and 456 patents (the

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    3/103

    3

    patents-in-suit), including the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or the BARBAR

    2008 Digital Auto Curling Iron. Mr. Barbar has infringed the patents-in-suit either

    directly or through acts of contributory infringement or inducement in violation of 35

    U.S.C. 271.

    BACKGROUND

    8. Conair acquired the exclusive license to the 804 and 118 patents on June7, 2011, and has worked diligently to commercialize the inventions claimed within them.

    The 804 and 118 patents, through the inventions embodied in their claims, permit one -

    step hair styling and curling, thus saving consumers substantial time and effort. As part of

    Conairs commercialization efforts, Conair designer Pierre L. Julemont (working at

    Conairs Belgian Babyliss subsidiary) perfected a sleek, novel and consumer-friendly

    ornamental design to enclose embodiments of the 804 and 118 patents. That ornamental

    design is embodied in the 456 patent.

    9. As a result of Conairs commercialization efforts, Conair and itssubsidiaries have experienced dramatic commercial success worldwide with its

    embodiments of those patents the Miracurl (promoted under the Babyliss brand) and

    Figure 1 of the '456 Patent

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    4/103

    4

    the Curl Secret (promoted under the Conair brand). That success has attracted a number

    of knock-off efforts and attempts to free ride on Conairs success. Defendants are now

    among them.

    10. BARBAR sells hair styling devices, including on its websitesbarbarartist.com, globalsalon.com and dominicbarbar.com. Mr. Barbar, as the chief

    officer of BARBAR, controls, directs, encourages and induces BARBAR to sell such

    devices, including the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or the BARBAR 2008

    Digital Auto Curling Iron (the accused devices). BARBAR and Mr. Barbar intend to

    sell and/or offer for sale the accused devices at the upcoming May 31 to June 2, 2014

    Premiere Orlando International Beauty Event, at Booth 2451. To an ordinary observer,

    those accused devices appear substantially and confusingly similar to Conairs

    commercial patented products, and to Conairs patented design:

    11. Conair owns distinctive, aesthetic, non-functional trade dress in its InfinityPro by Conair Curl Secret (Curl Secret) hair curling product. Conair has used this

    Defendants Accused Product

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    5/103

    5

    trade dress consistently in its marketing, including on its websites located on the internet

    at www.curlsecret.com, www.miracurlpro.com and Error! Hyperlink reference not

    valid.

    12. The trade dress of the Curl Secret is recognizable by its color which is avery deep, dark purple, almost black in appearance. The trade dress is also recognizable

    by the positioning of the controls for the Curl Secret which are located on the left side of

    the products lower appendage facing left when held in a stylists right hand during

    normal use. The trade dress is also recognizable in the unique shape of the Curl Secret,

    including its round bulbous clam-shell head and its sleek handle, as well as its swiveling

    truncated-cone power cord attachment where the cord trails away from the unit at a

    greater-than-90 degree angle, and has flexible ribs at the nearest part to the attachment.

    The trade dress for Miracurl is nearly identical, with three buttons instead of two, and

    aqua/teal coloring instead of deep purple.

    13. The Curl Secret and Miracurl trade dress symbolize the quality of theConair products, and have become distinctive to Conair through widespread use and

    advertising, which has exposed the Conair Curl Secret and Miracurl to many people,

    especially in the hair care industry. Conair has used the Curl Secret and Miracurl trade

    dress in a consistent and continuous fashion in commerce though its website, in print

    marketing material, and on the websites and marketing material of its authorized dealers

    throughout the United States.

    14. The Curl Secret and Miracurl trade dress is aesthetic and non-functional,and through consistent and continuous use it has come to identify the Conair Curl Secret

    and Miracurl products, and the public recognizes the trade dress and associates it with

    Conair and its Curl Secret and Miracurl products. The trade dress has become an asset of

    substantial value and is strongly associated with a single product line and source, namely

    the Conair Curl Secret and Miracurl products.

    15. As can be seen in the photographs below, Defendants have copied andused the Curl Secret and Miracurl trade dress in connection with their advertising and

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5

    http://www.curlsecret.com/http://www.curlsecret.com/http://www.miracurlpro.com/http://www.miracurlpro.com/http://www.miracurlpro.com/http://www.curlsecret.com/
  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    6/103

    6

    marketing of the confusingly similar accused devices in interstate commerce with the

    intention of misleading, deceiving or confusing consumers as to the origin of the accused

    products while trading on Conairs reputation and good will.

    Two views of Conair's Product

    Two views of Defendants InfringingProduct

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    7/103

    7

    16. The infringement by Defendants of the Curl Secret and Miracurl tradedress is likely to cause confusion, deception, and mistake among consumers and potential

    consumers of the Conair Curl Secret product.

    17. Conair has informed Defendants of its and its subsidiarysrights under thepatents-in-suit, and requested that they immediately cease and desist the infringing

    activities. On May 9, 2014, in-house counsel for Conair wrote a letter to Mr. Barbar

    naming, among others, the patents-in-suit, identifying the infringement by the accused

    products, and demanding that he immediately cease and desist all sales, marketing,

    advertising and website listings of the product, and any substantially similar product, and

    that you destroy or turn over to us your unsold inventory. On May 28, 2014, Conair

    management learned that, rather than cease-and-desist, instead Defendants planned to

    display the accused products at the Premiere Orlando International Beauty Event from

    May 31 to June 2, 2014, and seek orders that compete directly with Conairs patented

    commercial embodiments. Conair will also attend the same show.

    18. On information and belief, Defendants intend to sell or offer the accusedproducts for sale for a retail price well below the usual retailprice of Conairs patented

    products. Defendants threaten to have their accused products sold at retail for less than

    $80 per unit, while Conairs products usually sell at retail for over $140 per unit.

    COUNT I

    UTILITY PATENT INFRINGEMENT

    19. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.

    20. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the 804 and 118patents either directly or indirectly through acts of contributory infringement or

    inducement in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271, by making, using, selling, importing and/or

    offering to sell infringing products, namely the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    8/103

    8

    the BARBAR 2008 Digital Auto Curling Iron. Additional infringing models may be

    identified through discovery.

    21. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has injured Conair and it, therefore, is entitled to recover damages adequate to

    compensate it for such infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty.

    22. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has been willful and deliberate because Defendants have notice of or knew of the

    804 and 118 patentsand have nonetheless injured and will continue to injure Conair,

    unless and until this Court enters an injunction, which prohibits further infringement and

    specifically enjoins further manufacture, use, sale, importation and/or offer for sale of

    products or services that come within the scope of the 804 and 118 patents.

    COUNT II

    DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

    23. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.

    24.

    Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the 456 patenteither

    directly or indirectly through acts of contributory infringement or inducement in violation

    of 35 U.S.C. 271 by making, using, selling, importing and/or offering to sell infringing

    products, namely the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or the BARBAR 2008

    Digital Auto Curling Iron. Additional infringing models may be identified through

    discovery.

    25. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has injured Babyliss and it, therefore, is entitled to recover damages adequate to

    compensate it for such infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty.

    26. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has injured and will continue to injure Babyliss, unless and until this Court enters

    an injunction, which prohibits further infringement and specifically enjoins further

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    9/103

    9

    manufacture, use, sale, importation and/or offer for sale of products or services that come

    within the scope of the 456 patent.

    COUNT III

    FEDERAL TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT/UNFAIR COMPETITION

    27. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.

    28. Defendant's activities complained of herein constitute infringement ofConairs trade dress and unfair competition in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) to the

    injury and detriment of Plaintiffs.

    29. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants infringement, Conair hassuffered and will continue to suffer loss of income, profits and good will and defendants

    will continue to unfairly acquire income, profits, and good will.

    COUNT IV

    COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION

    30. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.

    31. Defendants activities complained of herein constitute unfair methods ofcompetition in violation of the common law of the State of Florida.

    32. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants competition, Conair hassuffered and will continue to suffer loss of income, profits and good will and defendants

    will continue to unfairly acquire income, profits, and good will.

    JURY DEMAND

    Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Conair requests a

    trial by jury on all issues presented that can properly be tried to a jury.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    10/103

    10

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Conair and Babyliss ask this Court to enter judgment against

    Defendants and against their subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all

    persons in active concert or participation with them, granting the following relief:

    A. An injunction preliminarily and permanently prohibiting furtherinfringement, inducement and contributory infringement of the patents-in-

    suit;

    B. An award of damages adequate to compensate Conair and Babyliss for theinfringement that has occurred, together with prejudgment interest from

    the date infringement began;

    C. All other damages permitted by 35 U.S.C. 284;D. Additional damages as expressly provided for in the case of a design

    patent under 35 U.S.C. 289;

    E. A finding that this case is exceptional and an award to Conair of itsattorneys fees and costs as providedby 35 U.S.C. 285;

    F. An award of costs; andG. Such other and further relief as this Court or a jury may deem proper and

    just.

    Dated: May 30, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

    By: /s/ Joel B. Rothman

    Joel B. [email protected]

    Florida Bar No. 98220

    Schneider Rothman IP Law Group

    4651 North Federal HighwayBoca Raton, Florida 33431

    voice: 561.404.4350fax: 561.404.4353

    Of counsel:

    Robert P. [email protected]

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    11/103

    11

    William W. Flachsbart

    [email protected]

    Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC

    333 N. Michigan Ave., 27th

    Floor

    Chicago, IL 60601

    Phone: 312-551-9500Fax: 312-551-9501

    Attorneys for Plaintiffs,

    Conair Corporation and Babyliss FACO

    SPRL

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    12/103

    !"#$%$& (

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 12

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    13/103

    The groundbreaking innovations that made infiniti Pro by Conair

    Curl Secretthe first-ever appliance to win the WWD Product of

    the Year award did not happen by accident. Conair put millions of

    dollars worth of time and resources into the patented technology

    and proprietary design that let this revolutionary new retail styler,

    and its professional counterpart, automatically create a perfect curl.

    Conair Corporation is the sole owner of worldwide patents andtrademarks for Curl Secret.These legal entities protect both Conair

    and our retail partners from the dangers and liabilities of poor-quality

    imitations that may not follow safety guidelines. Conair cares about

    the safety of its consumers and has conducted rigorous testing to

    ensure the safety and integrity of these products. Poor quality

    imitations and counterfeit electrical hair appliances have exhibited

    significant defects and can cause serious harm to consumers and/or

    damage to their homes or other property if left undetected.

    Conair is actively working with local, state, federal and international

    law enforcement, as well as U.S. and foreign customs officials, to stop

    the sale of counterfeit goods. All legitimate Conair styling appliances

    are protected by granted and/or pending patents.

    We are proud to partner with reputable companies that are as

    dedicated as we are to ensuring the legitimacy, quality and safety

    of products that carry our name.

    CONAIR CORPORATION ONE CUMMINGS PO INT ROAD STAMFORD CT 06902 203.351.9000

    Conair Granted Patents

    for Award-Winning Styler

    PATENTS granted and/or pending include U.S. Patents 8,607,804, XXXXXXX,

    and XXXXXXX. BABYLISS,BABYLISSPRO,MIRACURL,CURL SECRET,CURL

    GENIUS,PERFECT CURL,RUSK MIRACURL,and CURLMATICare trademarks

    of Conair Corporation. 2014 Conair Corporation. All rights reserved.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 13

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    14/103

    !"#$%$& (

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-2 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 14

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    15/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-2 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 15

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    16/103

    !"#$%$& (

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-3 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 16

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    17/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-3 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 17

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    18/103

    !"#$%$& (

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 18

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    19/103

    IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT COUNTERFEIT RUSK MIRACURL STYLERS

    RUSK MIRACURL STYLER

    The RUSK MiraCurl styler was developed by Conair Corporation and utilizes a significant investment of time, effort and money.

    This innovative product is based on patented technology and a proprietary design, which allows professional stylists to automatically

    create one perfect curl after another -consistently, effortlessly, safely.

    WE CARE ABOUT YOUR SAFETY

    Conair Corporation has obtained worldwide patents and trademarks* for the MiraCurl styler and is serious about enforcing its rights

    against sellers, importers and makers of counterfeit and imitation goods. Conair and RUSK care deeply about the safety of salon

    professionals and their clients. We conduct rigorous testing to ensure the safety and integrity of our products. Poor -quality imitations

    and counterfeit electrical hair appliances have exhibited significant defects that can cause serious harm to users and/or damage to their

    businesses or other property.

    Conair is actively working with local, federal and international law enforcement, as well as Australian and foreign customs officials,

    to stop the sale and manufacture of counterfeit and imitation goods. The Companys goal is to protect its brands, products and

    customers. All legitimate RUSK MiraCurl stylers are protected by granted and/or pending patents as well as registered trademarks.

    Please be sure to purchase the RUSK MiraCurl styler from a trusted retailer or distributor to ensure product performance andsatisfaction as well as your safe use.

    *PATENTS include Australian Patents 348730 and 351553 and New Zealand Patent 417455. Additional Australia patent rights are pending. Babyliss, BabylissPro, MiraCurl and

    RUSK are trademarks of Conair Corporation. 2014 Conair Corporation. All rights reserved.

    If you have seen counterfeit goods or have encountered a counterfeit or product of inferior quality that looks suspicious, please

    contact us on:

    [email protected] Call 1800 126 806 (Australia) or Call 0800 003 618 (New Zealand).

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID 19

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    20/103

    HOW TO SPOT A COUNTERFEIT

    1. Colour- The professional RUSK MiraCurl styler is only available in the following colours: Black Metallic charcoal finish with purple highlights Pinklimited stock, only sold through Hairhouse Warehouse Bluelimited stock, only sold through Price Attack

    2. PlugThe professional RUSK MiraCurl styler sold in Australia and New Zealand s has an Australian SAA plug. Any stylersold in Australia or New Zealand containing a non-Australian SAA plug with a separate adaptor is not a genuine product. Any

    product advertised as dual voltage, is not genuine.

    3. PackagingDamaged, faded or missing packaging are often signs of counterfeit goods. Also, look for misspelled words, oddmarkings, missing manuals and/or warranty documentation.

    4. DistributorThe professional RUSK MiraCurl styler is sold only through reputable RUSK approved wholesalers and salonslisted on our website atwww.rusk.com.au.

    5. WebsitesBeware of websites containing domain names using our trademark name, MiraCurl, in combination with wordssuch as cheap, discount, outlet, bargain, buy, 4sale, sold, shop, a country name and any other extraneous wording. These are

    all illegal sites that intend to deceive consumers. The official website for the professional RUSK MiraCurl styler iswww.rusk.com.auorwww.rusk.co.nz.

    Also beware of eBay stores selling different brands and versions of the MiraCurl.

    6. Price If the price looks too good to be true, then it probably is. In Australia, the RUSK MiraCurl is around $199. In NewZealand, the RUSK MiraCurl is around $275.

    7. ShippingThe professional RUSK MiraCurl styler is only shipped from within Australia, nowhere else. Items shipped fromAsia, the US and some locations within Australia may also be fake or counterfeit

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID 20

    http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/
  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    21/103

    WHAT TO DO IF YOUVEBOUGHT A COUNTERFEIT OR IMITATION

    1. Contact the seller for a complete refund2. Call your credit card company and requesta chargeback to the seller3. Report your purchase to RUSK/Conair Professional.

    WHAT WE ARE DOING

    Conair and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide are actively working with local, federal and international law enforcement, as

    well as Australian and foreign customs officials, to stop the sale of counterfeit and imitation goods. We have already removed

    hundreds of illegal websites and listings of counterfeit goods from online auction and marketplace sites such as Amazon, eBay,

    AliBaba and TaoBao, to name a few. We actively conduct investigations, raids and seizures globally to remove dangerous

    counterfeit goods from the market. We want you to be safe and buy only authentic goods. We guarantee the performance of our

    professional RUSK MiraCurl styler and are proud to partner with distributors that support our efforts to ensure the legitimacy,

    quality and safety of our goods.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID 21

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    22/103

    !"#$%$& !

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 37 PageID 22

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    23/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 1 of 27

    United States Patent 8,651,118 BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Claim 1

    A hair styling device having:

    a body defining a chamber adapted toaccommodate a length of hair, the

    chamber having a primary openingthrough which the length of hair may

    pass into the chamber;

    The area between the

    outer wall of the

    central cylinder andthe inner wall of theouter housing

    constitutes thechamber, with hair

    passing into thechamber through the

    opening shown.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 37 PageID 23

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    24/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 2 of 27

    a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the

    primary opening;The crescent-shaped

    rotating element(bracketed in bottom

    picture) rotates adjacentto the primary opening

    where hair is drawn in.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 37 PageID 24

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    25/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 3 of 27

    an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the

    rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;

    The crescent-shaped

    rotating element

    (bracketed in bottompicture) wraps the hairaround the center

    cylindrical piece. The endof the cylindrical piece

    (bottom arrow) constitutesthe free end.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 37 PageID 25

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    26/103

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    27/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 5 of 27

    Claim 2

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the secondary opening

    is annular and surrounds the free end ofthe elongate member.

    Claim 4

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the secondary opening

    is permanently connected to theprimary opening.

    The secondary opening is in

    a ring shape and is at theend of the central cylinder.

    The primary opening (top

    arrow) and secondaryopening (bottom arrow) are

    both integral with theoverall device.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 6 of 37 PageID 27

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    28/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 6 of 27

    Claim 5

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment

    is located within one of (i) thesecondary opening and (ii) the primary

    opening, and wherein the secondaryopening is connected to the primary

    opening by way of a passageway.

    The top portion is located within

    the primary opening when closed.

    The primary opening (top arrow) isconnected to the secondary opening

    (bottom arrow) through the central

    chamber.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 7 of 37 PageID 28

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    29/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 7 of 27

    Claim 7

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment

    is spring-biased to its open position.

    Claim 8

    A hair styling device according to

    claim 1, having a first handle part and asecond handle part, wherein the

    movable abutment is driven to itsclosed position as the second handle

    part is moved towards the first handlepart.

    The top portion ofthe device closes

    down as thesecond handle (top

    arrow) is movedtoward the first

    handle (lowerarrow).

    The device contains a

    spring that forces it into an

    open position.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 37 PageID 29

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    30/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 8 of 27

    Claim 9

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, having a first handle part and a

    second handle part, wherein themovable abutment moves from its

    closed position to its open position asthe second handle part is moved away

    from the first handle part.

    Claim 10

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment

    in its open position does not obstructany part of the secondary opening.

    The device opensup as the second

    handle (toparrow) is moved

    away from thefirst handle

    (lower arrow).

    When the device is inthe open position, the

    top portion (top arrow)does not obstruct the

    secondary opening

    (bottom arrow).

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 9 of 37 PageID 30

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    31/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 9 of 27

    Claim 11

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment

    is maintained in its closed positionwhile the rotatable element is rotating.

    The crescent-shaped rotating element

    (bracketed) is in motion while the deviceis in the closed position (bottom picture).

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 37 PageID 31

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    32/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 10 of 27

    Claim 12

    A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment

    is located within the primary opening.

    The top portion of the device is locatedwithin the primary opening, where hair

    passes through.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 11 of 37 PageID 32

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    33/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 11 of 27

    Claim 13

    A hair styling device having:

    a body defining a chamber adapted to

    accommodate a length of hair, thechamber having a primary opening

    through which the length of hair maypass into the chamber;

    The area between the outerwall of the central cylinder

    and the inner wall of theouter housing constitutes the

    chamber, with hair passing

    into the chamber throughthe opening shown.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 12 of 37 PageID 33

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    34/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 12 of 27

    a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the

    primary opening;The crescent-shaped

    element (bracketed,bottom picture) rotates

    adjacent to the primaryopening where hair is

    drawn in.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 13 of 37 PageID 34

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    35/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 13 of 27

    an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the

    rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;

    The crescent-shaped

    rotating element

    (bracketed, bottompicture) wraps the hairaround the center

    cylindrical piece. The endof the central cylinder

    (bottom arrow) constitutesthe free end.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 14 of 37 PageID 35

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    36/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 14 of 27

    the chamber having a secondaryopening through which the length of

    hair may pass out of the chamber, thesecondary opening being located

    adjacent to the free end; and

    The secondary opening is at

    the free end of the chamber.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 15 of 37 PageID 36

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    37/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 15 of 27

    a movable abutment which can engagethe length of hair in use, the movable

    abutment having an open position inwhich the length of hair can pass

    through the secondary opening, and aclosed position in which the length of

    hair is retained within the chamber,wherein the movable abutment is

    spring-biased to its open position.

    When in the open position

    (top picture), hair can flowthrough the secondary

    opening. When closed(bottom picture), hair is

    retained within the chamber.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 16 of 37 PageID 37

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    38/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 16 of 27

    The device contains a spring

    that forces it into an openposition.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 17 of 37 PageID 38

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    39/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 17 of 27

    Claim 14

    A hair styling device having:

    a body defining a chamber adapted to

    accommodate a length of hair, thechamber having a primary opening

    through which the length of hair maypass into the chamber;

    The area between theouter wall of the

    central cylinder andthe inner wall of the

    outer housingconstitutes the

    chamber, with hairpassing into the

    chamber through theopening shown.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 18 of 37 PageID 39

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    40/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 18 of 27

    a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the

    primary opening;The crescent-shaped

    element (bracketed,bottom picture) rotates

    adjacent to the primaryopening where hair is

    drawn in.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 19 of 37 PageID 40

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    41/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 19 of 27

    an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the

    rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;

    The crescent-shaped

    rotating element(bracketed, bottom

    picture) wraps the hair

    around the centercylindrical piece. The endof the central cylinder

    (bottom arrow) constitutesthe free end.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 20 of 37 PageID 41

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    42/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 20 of 27

    the chamber having a secondaryopening through which the length of

    hair may pass out of the chamber, thesecondary opening being located

    adjacent to the free end;

    The secondary opening is at

    the free end of the chamber.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 21 of 37 PageID 42

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    43/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 21 of 27

    a movable abutment which can engagethe length of hair in use, the movable

    abutment having an open position inwhich the length of hair can pass

    through the secondary opening, and aclosed position in which the length of

    hair is retained within the chamber; and

    When in the open position

    (top picture), hair can flowthrough the secondary

    opening. When closed(bottom picture), hair is

    retained within the chamber.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 22 of 37 PageID 43

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    44/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 22 of 27

    a first handle part and a second handlepart, wherein the movable abutment is

    driven to its closed position as thesecond handle part is moved towards

    the first handle part.

    Claim 15

    A hair styling device having:

    a body defining a chamber adapted toaccommodate a length of hair, the

    chamber having a primary openingthrough which the length of hair may

    pass into the chamber;

    The top portion ofthe device closes

    down as thesecond handle (top

    arrow) is movedtoward the first

    handle (lower

    arrow).

    The area between theouter wall of thecentral cylinder and

    the inner wall of the

    outer housingconstitutes thechamber, with hair

    passing into thechamber through the

    opening shown.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 23 of 37 PageID 44

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    45/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 23 of 27

    a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the

    primary opening;The crescent-shaped

    rotating element(bracketed, bottom

    picture) rotates adjacentto the primary opening

    where hair is drawn in.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 24 of 37 PageID 45

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    46/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 24 of 27

    an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the

    rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;

    The crescent-shapedrotating element

    (bracketed, bottompicture) wraps the hair

    around the centercylindrical piece. The end

    of the central cylinder(bottom arrow) constitutes

    the free end.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 25 of 37 PageID 46

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    47/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 25 of 27

    the chamber having a secondaryopening through which the length of

    hair may pass out of the chamber, thesecondary opening being located

    adjacent to the free end;

    The secondary opening is at

    the free end of the chamber.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 26 of 37 PageID 47

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    48/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 26 of 27

    a movable abutment which can engagethe length of hair in use, the movable

    abutment having an open position inwhich the length of hair can pass

    through the secondary opening, and aclosed position in which the length of

    hair is retained within the chamber; and

    When in the open position

    (top picture), hair can flowthrough the secondary

    opening. When closed(bottom picture), hair is

    retained within the chamber.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 27 of 37 PageID 48

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    49/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 27 of 27

    a first handle part and a second handlepart, wherein the movable abutment

    moves from its closed position to itsopen position as the second handle part

    is moved away from the first handlepart.

    The device opens

    up as the secondhandle (top

    arrow) is movedaway from the

    first handle(lower arrow).

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 28 of 37 PageID 49

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    50/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 1 of 9

    United States Patent 8,607,804 BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Claim 1

    A hair styling aid comprising:

    a generally cylindrical elongate memberfor receiving a length of hair to be

    styled,

    guide structure for receiving the length

    of hair and for guiding the length of hairtowards the elongate member,

    The cylinder in the centerof the device comprises

    the elongate member.

    The V-shaped guide

    structure (emphasized inyellow) guides hair into

    the device and toward thecenter cylinder.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 29 of 37 PageID 50

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    51/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 2 of 9

    a rotatable element rotatable relative tothe guide structure, the rotatable element

    having a part adapted to engage thelength of hair for winding the length of

    hair around the elongate member,

    The crescent-shaped portion of thedevice displayed within the

    brackets (bottom picture) rotatesrelative to the guide structure (top

    picture, emphasized in yellow). Thehair is wound around the central

    cylinder.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 30 of 37 PageID 51

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    52/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 3 of 9

    a housing surrounding a part of theelongate member, the housing having at

    least one wall, the at least one wallcomprising a generally cylindrical inner

    surface,

    an elongate opening in the at least one

    wall parallel with the elongate member,

    The opening in the wallof the housing runs

    parallel with the centralcylinder.

    The housing (displayed within

    the brackets) has an innercylindrical wall.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 31 of 37 PageID 52

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    53/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 4 of 9

    a chamber bordered by the generallycylindrical inner surface and the

    generally cylindrical elongate memberfor containing the length of hair,

    the rotatable element being rotatablerelative to the generally cylindrical inner

    surface,

    The chamber constitutes

    the space between thecylinder wall and the

    cylindrical inner wall ofthe housing.

    The rotating element

    of the housing rotatesaround the inner

    cylindrical wall of thehousing.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 32 of 37 PageID 53

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    54/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 5 of 9

    the part adapted to engage the length ofhair passing around the generally

    cylindrical elongate member whenwinding the length of hair around the

    elongate member,The crescent-shapedrotating part (bracketed

    portion of bottom picture)can engage the hair and

    wind around the centerstationary piece.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 33 of 37 PageID 54

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    55/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 6 of 9

    the length of hair not being clamped inthe chamber during styling thereof,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nx0-DJRJC0

    the guide structure being adjacent the

    elongate opening and comprisingopposedly facing converging surfaces

    adapted to the length of hair through theelongate opening, towards the elongate

    member, and

    Hair is drawn in bythe curling iron and

    rotated around thecylinder, and is not

    clamped down at anystage.

    The guide structure(emphasized in

    yellow) is V-shapedand is adjacent to the

    opening throughwhich hair is drawn

    in.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 34 of 37 PageID 55

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    56/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 7 of 9

    the housing wall(s) being heated in use.

    Claim 4

    A hair styling aid according to claim 1,wherein the housing comprises the guide

    structure.

    The red and white

    wires are connectedto the displayed

    heating elements.

    The guide structured

    (emphasized in yellow)is part of the overall

    housing of the device.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 35 of 37 PageID 56

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    57/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 8 of 9

    Claim 5

    A hair styling aid according to claim 1,wherein the housing is integral with a

    handle.

    The device handle and

    housing constitute one

    piece.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 36 of 37 PageID 57

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    58/103

    U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron

    Page 9 of 9

    Claim 6

    A hair styling aid according to claim 1,wherein the rotatable element rotates

    relative to the generally cylindricalelongate member.

    The crescent-shapedrotating portion of the

    device (bottom picture,

    bracketed) rotates aroundthe central cylinder.

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 37 of 37 PageID 58

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    59/103

    !"#$%$& (

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-6 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID 59

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    60/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-6 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID 60

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    61/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-6 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID 61

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    62/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 62

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    63/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    64/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 20 PageID 64

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    65/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    66/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 5 of 20 PageID 66

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    67/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    68/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 7 of 20 PageID 68

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    69/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 20 PageID 69

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    70/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    71/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 20 PageID 71

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    72/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    73/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    74/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    75/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 14 of 20 PageID 75

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    76/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 15 of 20 PageID 76

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    77/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 16 of 20 PageID 77

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    78/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 17 of 20 PageID 78

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    79/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 18 of 20 PageID 79

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    80/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 19 of 20 PageID 80

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    81/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 20 of 20 PageID 81

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    82/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID 82

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    83/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 13 PageID 83

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    84/103

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    85/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    86/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    87/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    88/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    89/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 13 PageID 89

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    90/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 9 of 13 PageID 90

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    91/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 13 PageID 91

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    92/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 11 of 13 PageID 92

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    93/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 12 of 13 PageID 93

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    94/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 13 of 13 PageID 94

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    95/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 95

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    96/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    97/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    98/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    99/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    100/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    101/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    102/103

  • 8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint

    103/103

    Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-11 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID 103