comparison of spray droplet characteristics for nozzles used for agronomic weed control robert wolf...

16
Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dept.

Upload: conrad-hines

Post on 04-Jan-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for

Agronomic Weed Control

Robert Wolf

Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dept.

Page 2: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Nozzle Efficacy/Drift Slope

Extended Range

Chamber Design

Venturi Design - I

Venturi Design - II

• XR, TR

• Turbo Flood• Turbo TeeJet

• Air Mix• AI XR• GuardianAir

• AI• Ultra Low Drift• Turbo Drop

• TTI

Nozzle development timeline

Page 3: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

New 2008 Test Nozzles!

Turbo TwinJet

AI XR TeeJet

Air Mix & TDHSTF- Greenleaf

GuardianAir - Hypro

Page 4: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural
Page 5: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare droplet spectra characteristics for nozzle types used to apply postemergence herbicides.

Page 6: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Materials and Methods cont.:

24 ft. spray bar7.5 GPA @ 10 MPH0.24 GPM / nozzleNozzle Spacing: 20 in.Boom Height: 20 in.

Page 7: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

1. XR Flat-fan (XR)

5. AIC Venturi Flat-fan6. TurboDrop High Speed Twin-fan7. Ultra Lo Drift (ULD)8. TTI Venturi Flat-fan

Materials and Methods cont.:

2. DR Flat-fan DR3. Turbo Flat-fan (TT)4. Turbo Twin Flat-fan (TTJ60)

9. BFS Venturi Flat-fan10. AIXR Venturi Flat-fan (AIXR)11. Air Mix Venturi Flat-fan (AM)12. GuardianAir Venturi Flat-fan (GA)

Page 8: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural
Page 9: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Discussion

Results

Page 10: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

DropletScan used to analyze droplets

Droplet scan software was used for droplet characteristics

Volume Median Diameter, Percent Area Coverage, Deposition

Statistical analysis with SAS

Page 11: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Volume Median Diameter

506467 487 491 475 460 462

391

540

377

475

372

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Mic

ron

s

Droplet Size

ba

efcd

fd bc bc cd d d c

Page 12: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Coverge

Coverge Across Nozzle Type

13.9 13.714.5 14.1

12.313.5 12.9

15.1

10.7

13.6

16.9 17.4

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

Perc

en

t A

rea C

overa

ge

cd cd bc deb

f

cd

a a

bc c cde

Page 13: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Deposition

Deposition Across Nozzle Type

5.2 5.4 5.5 5.34.8

5.3 5.1

5.9

3.8

5.5

6.57.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

AIC11

002

AIXR11

0025

AM11

0025

BFS11002

5

DR1100

25

GA11

0025

TDHSTF110

02

TT1100

25

TTI110

02

TTJ601

10025

ULD12

002

XR1100

3

Gal

lon

s p

er A

cre

b b b b b bb b

b b

bb

Page 14: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Findings

• Statistical differences were found for all droplet characteristics measured.

• TTI - largest droplets, with lowest coverage and deposition.

• XR - smallest droplets, with most coverage and deposition.

• ULD – middle on droplet size, 2nd best coverage and deposition.

• Venturi design II group as an average had smaller droplets, better coverage and deposition than the venturi design I group.

Page 15: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Conclusions:

• The findings support that the use of nozzle types producing smaller droplets tend to have more coverage and deposition than those producing larger droplets.

• Data also supports that the newer designs in venturi nozzles will provide more coverage and deposition than the older venturi nozzle designs.

Page 16: Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural

Thanks