comparison jks 315 eagle vs first solar fs-3100-plus

22
JANUARY, 2015 Juan Carlos Gonzalez, Sr Technical Service Manager [email protected] p: +41 791921579

Upload: juan-carlos-gonzalez

Post on 06-Apr-2017

351 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

JANUARY, 2015

Juan Carlos Gonzalez, Sr Technical Service Manager [email protected]

p: +41 791921579

Page 2: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Comparison JKM320PP72 Vs First Solar FS-3100-

PLUS

Page 3: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Data sheets. STC Values

www.jinkosolar.com 3

Brand JKM320PP72 First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Technology Poly CdTe

Power(Wp) 320 100

Vmpp (V) 37.4 46.8

Impp (A) 8.56 2.14

Voc (V) 46.4 58.8

Isc (A) 9.05 2.33

Efficiency@STC 16.49% 13.88%

Fill Factor (STC) 76.2% 72.9%

Power tolerance 0/+3% +/-5%

Page 4: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Data sheets. NOCT Values

www.jinkosolar.com 4

Brand JKM320PP72 First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Power@NOCT (Wp) 238 75.4

Vmpp@NOCT (V) 34.7 43.7

Impp@NOCT (A) 6.86 1.73

Voc@NOCT (V) 43.7 55.5

Isc@NOCT (A) 7.30 1.88

Efficiency@NOCT 12.26% 10.47%

Fill Factor (NOCT) 74.6% 72.26%

Page 5: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Data sheets. Thermal parameters

www.jinkosolar.com 5

Brand JINKO (JKM) First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

NOCT (°C) 45±2°C 45±2°C

Temp. Coeff. Pmax -0.40 %/°C -0.29 %/°C

Temp. Coeff. Voc -0.30 %/°C -0.28 %/°C

Temp. Coeff. Isc 0.06 %/°C 0.04 %/°C

Page 6: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Temperature effects. Sandia Model

www.jinkosolar.com 6

Page 7: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Temperature effects. Sandia Model

www.jinkosolar.com 7

Page 8: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Ambient temperature effects. Sandia Model. Example for Wind speed 0m/s

www.jinkosolar.com 8

Page 9: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Ambient temperature effects. Sandia Model. Example for Wind speed 0m/s

www.jinkosolar.com 9

Page 10: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Ambient temperature effects. Sandia Model. Example for Wind speed 0m/s

www.jinkosolar.com 10

Page 11: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Mechanical Characteristics and others

www.jinkosolar.com 11

Brand JINKO (JKM) First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Junction Box IP67 ?

Glass ARC 4mm ARC 3.2mm

Weight (Kg) 26.5 12

Mechanical load (Snow/Wind) in PA 5400/2400* 5400/2400***

Cable Length (mm) 900** 610

*7000/3600 Pa not certified ** under request longer cable *** not indicated in the datasheet but supposed according to IEC

Page 12: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Warranty conditions

www.jinkosolar.com 12

Warranty terms JINKO (JKM) First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Power warranty LINEAR

1st year 2.5% 3%

Year 2 to 25 0.7%

Product warranty 10 years

Additional certificates (BOM)

Sand test / Ammonia / Salt Mist/PID

Sand Test / Salt Mist / PID*

*Negative grounding -> a ground fault will close the loop

Page 13: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Case scenario 120MWp

www.jinkosolar.com 13

DC/AC RATIO 1.2

Page 14: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Case scenario 120MWp

www.jinkosolar.com 14

UP TO 70% LESS MODULES NEEDED CHOSSING JINKO FOR THE SAME DC POWER

Page 15: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Case scenario 120MWp

www.jinkosolar.com 15

• ALMOST HALF OF MODULES FOR FIRST COMPARED WITH JINKO’S 1500V ALTERNATIVE. • IT IMPACTS THE NUMBER OF STRINGS NEEDED AND THEREFORE THE QUANTITY OF STRING

BOXES AND WIRING

Page 16: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Case scenario 120MWp

www.jinkosolar.com 16

• 75% LESS STRINGS USING JINKO(1000V) AND UP TO 83% LESS STRING USING JINKO(1500V) FOR -20◦C

Page 17: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Case scenario 120MWp

www.jinkosolar.com 17

IN CASE OF STRING BOXES OF 16-INPUTS ARE SELECTED

Page 18: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

Case scenario 120MWp

www.jinkosolar.com 18

IN CASE OF STRING BOXES OF 32-INPUTS ARE SELECTED

Page 19: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

CAPEX IMPACT

www.jinkosolar.com 19

• LABOUR COST, TIME, MODULE BREAKAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE,…

Modules needed for a given power

• LAND REQUIREMENTS, TRACKS AND WIRING

Power density (W/m2) or Ground Coverage Ratio

• 70% LESS MODULES USED WITH JINKO COMPARE WITH FIRST

Mounting structure

• OVERCURRENT AND OVERVOLTAGE PROTECTIONS, SWITCHES, MONITORING WIRING

String Boxes, electrical protections and monitoring

• LARGER PERIMETER

Security and surveillance system

Page 20: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

CAPEX IMPACT

www.jinkosolar.com 20

• Based on the efficiency (W/m2) for FST (13.88%) and JKS (16.49%), the impact on the mounting structure can go up to 15% using FST compared with JKS

• The load (kg/m2) is 22% higher for FST than for JKS

Mounting structure

Page 21: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

OPEX IMPACT

www.jinkosolar.com 21

• QUANTITY OF WATER NEEDED (ASSUMED WATER USED FOR CLEANING PURPOSES)

• TIME AND LABOUR COST

Cleaning

• MORE PROTECTIONS AND PARTS

Spare parts

• MORE COMPLEXITY AND LARGER AMOUNT DATA

Monitoring

• OVERCURRENT AND OVERVOLTAGE PROTECTIONS, SWITCHES, MONITORING WIRING

String Boxes, electrical protections and monitoring

Page 22: Comparison JKS 315 Eagle vs First Solar FS-3100-PLUS

www.jinkosolar.com 22

Power guard

Insurance Carrier

Customer

Customer files claim with Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar is no longer in business. Claim filed directly

with PowerGuard

Jinko Solar and PowerGuard are no longer in business. Claim

filed directly with Insurance Carrier