comparative private law reasonabless of contract’s content university of oslo prof. giuditta...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW
REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT
University of Oslo
Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss
![Page 2: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Case I – Limitation of liability
• A software company sells an accounting programme for law firms to a law firm
• The programme turns out to be inadequate for accounting of more than 40 accounts
![Page 3: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Liability clause
• General sale conditions:
“In case of non-satisfactory performance the buyer may request the seller to replace the programme with the newer version, to be developed within 6 months.”
![Page 4: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Limitation of liability:Evaluation of contract’s content
• Norwegian law: law firm may request avoidance, reduction of price
• German law: law firm may request avoidance, reduction of price (?)
• UNIDROIT: law firm may request avoidance, reduction of price
• PECL: limitation of liability clause is valid (?)
• Italian law: limitation of liability clause is valid (?)
• English law: limitation of liability clause is valid
• CISG: limitation of liability clause is valid (?)
![Page 5: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Case II – Termination for immaterial breach
• An enterprise borrows a considerable amount of money from a financial institution, to be repaid over a 10 years period
• The loan agreement contains several covenants and obligations for the borrower, i.a. to deliver to the lender two copies of the quarterly accounts not later than 2 days after the date of their issuance
• After 1 year the borrower fails to meet the delivery term by 2 days
• The lender deems this a breach of contract and requires immediate repayment of the whole outstanding amount
![Page 6: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Termination-upon-default clause
”Upon any breach whatsoever of any of the Borrower’s obligations, the Lender shall be entitled to terminate this agreement with immediate effect and to require the immediate repayment of the whole outstanding amount. If the Borrower offers to remedy the default, the Lender shall be entitled, at its sole discretion, to refuse such offer and to proceed to termination of this agreement.”
![Page 7: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Termination for immaterial breach:evaluation of contract’s content
• Norwegian law: The bank is not entitled to terminate
• German law: The bank is not entitled to terminate
• PECL: The bank is not entitled to terminate (?)
• Italian law: The bank may terminate
• English law: The bank may terminate
• UNIDROIT: The bank may terminate
![Page 8: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Case III – Measurement of energy delivery
• An energy producer enters into an agreement for the supply of energy to several enterprises
• The price to be paid is calculated on the square area of each enterprise
• After some years a meter for the measurement of the actual consumption of energy is installed, and the producer requests that one enterprise starts making payments on the basis of the consumption (higher than if based on the area)
![Page 9: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Payment clause
• The clause clearly states that payment is to be made on the basis of the receipient’s area.
• No renegotiation clause
![Page 10: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Measurement clause:evaluation of contract’s content
• Norwegian law: Payment to be maid on the basis of actual consumption
• German law: contractual clause to be followed
• Italian law: contractual clause to be followed
• English law:contractual clause to be followed
• UNIDROIT, PECL, CISG: contractual clause to be followed
![Page 11: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Possible aims of rules on fair terms
• Protect the weaker contractual party
• Ensure fair use of general conditions
• Ensure reasonabless of bargains
![Page 12: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Protection of the weaker contractual party (consumer)
• Norwegian consumer sale act § 26, Formation of contracts act § 37
• German BGB § 437, 475, § 138
• Italian CC art. 1492, 1469bis
• English sale of goods act sec 14
• UNIDROIT art. 1.4• PECL art. 1:103(2)
![Page 13: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Fair use of general conditions
Norwegian law:
• Restrictive interpretation of what one party has agreed to
• §36 avtl (since 1983): unreasonable terms may be set aside or modified
• Not for ”agreed documents”
• §37 avtl extends control to general conditions where one party is a consumer
![Page 14: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Fair use of general conditions
German law:
• BGB §§ 305 ff. (former AGB (1976))– Ineffective clauses, if prejudice to principle of
good faith– Contra proferentem– Surprising terms– Individual terms prevail– …
![Page 15: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Fair use of general conditions
Italian law:
• Art. 1341 General terms are binding if they were known or could have been known (diligence)
• Particularly ”oppressive” clauses to be specifically undersigned
![Page 16: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Fair use of general conditions
English law:
• Strict interpretation of exemption clauses
• Contra proferentem
• Fundamental breach?
![Page 17: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Fair use of general conditions
UNIDROIT:
• Art. 2.19: Rules on formation
• Art. 2.20: surprising terms
• Art. 2.21: individual terms to prevail
![Page 18: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Fair use of general conditions
• PECL:
• Art. 2:104: can be invoked if reasonable steps were maid to bring them to the attention of the other party
• Art. 4:109: not enforceable if significant imbalance between parties
![Page 19: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Reasonableness of bargain
Norwegian law:• Avtl. §36: unreasonable terms may be set aside
or modified• If circumstances of the specific case (also
supervening) make the performance unfair for one party
• Fairness: guidance in statutory rules, commercial practices, common sense of justice
• Restrictive use between parties with equal bargaining power
![Page 20: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Reasonableness of bargain
German law:
• §242 BGB: ensure good faith in performance
• Applied to integrate terms, prevent application of terms, modify terms (§ 313)
![Page 21: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Reasonableness of bargain
Italian law:
• Art. 1339 CC: replacement of clauses only if expressly provided for by specific statutory rules
![Page 22: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Reasonableness of bargain
• UNIDROIT:
• Art. 7.1.6: exemption clauses inapplicable if grossly unfair having regard to the contract’s purpose
![Page 23: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Reasonableness of bargain
• PECL:
• Art. 5:102(g):good faith in interpretation
![Page 24: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Common features
• Protection of the weaker contractual party
![Page 25: COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW REASONABLESS OF CONTRACT’S CONTENT University of Oslo Prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022031914/56649cfe5503460f949ced3f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Judge’s power to control contract’s content
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Norway Germany Italy England UNIDROIT PECL
Consumer
Weaker p.
g.c. Dil.
g.c.meas.
g.c.surpr.
good faith
fairness