Company Confidential 1

Other Party Management (OPMT)

9104/1 Special Sub Team

Recommendation Summary

Tim Lee & Ian FollandJune 23, 2010

2

Background

9104/1 Ballot Failure

• The Dec 2009 ballot draft failed in Americas and Asia Pacific and stopped in Europe

• 9104/1 Sub Team and OPMT conducted extensive debate on “Show Stopper” issues but failed to reach any consensus.

– Site definition

– Audit day calculation for multiple sites

Go Forward – IAQG Council Direction

• OPMT was directed to charter a focused team to conduct a non advocate review of the show stopper issues. Team shall be comprised of technical experts

– Team launch - May 2010

– Recommend a solution (June 23, 2010)

3

9104/1 Special Team

Ian Folland & Tim Lee – Facilitators

Team Members:

• Roger Bennett - International Independent Organization for Certification (IIOC) – IAF MD 1 Convener and IAF MD 5 Co-convener

• Reg Blake - Certification Body (CB) representing the Independent Association of Accredited Registrars (IAAR)

• Norbert Borzek - German AB - DAkkS – Chair of the IAF Technical Committee .

• Patrick Boucheron – Turbomeca, France, OPMT Voting Member

• Buddy Cressionnie - IAQG 9100 International Document Representative (IDR)

• Randy Dougherty – USA AB - ANAB Director – Chair of the IAF

• Michel Jacquaniello – Zodiac Aerospace, France

• Kunihiro Tanabe - Japanese AB - JAB

• Norikazu Tsuchiya – KHI, Japan, OPMT Voting Member

4

Team Recommendations

• The team developed a detailed document containing the following concepts:

– Definitions and eligibility criteria for single site, multiple site, campus, several site and complex organizations;

– Audit day calculations methodology for all organizational types;

– Information in the form of a matrix and diagrams to help understand the different types or organizations

9104-1 Recommendations

9104-1 Certification Matrix

5

Definitions

• The team recommended that the ICOP process utilizes as much of IAF Mandatory Document language as possible

• Definition:– Site - A site is a permanent location where an

organization carries out work or a service• Rationale:

– Allows for dual certification (ISO and AQMS)– IAF language has been tested and currently in

use by CB’s

• Used to resolve the show stopper issue related to Site definition

6

Organizational Structure

• Team has developed detailed definitions and eligibility criteria for the following organizational structures

– Single Site

– Multiple Site

– Campus

– Several Sites

– Complex

• The above takes into consideration the unique organizational structures that exist in the Aviation, Space and Defense industry today

7

Example A - Campus

Must have a common quality management system

8

Example B - Several Sites

Must have a common quality management system

9

Audit Day Requirements

• Utilize audit day table contained in 9104-1 December 2009 draft.

• Audit Day Calculations

– Single Site – Number of employees – Reductions for ASRP and CAAT only

– Multiple Site – Number of employees at each site. Reductions for ASRP and CAAT only

– Campus – Total number of employees across all sites. No further reductions. 10% addition for auditing aspects of a campus and additional communication by audit team

– Several Sites - Number of employees at each site. Maximum of 30% reduction for reduced scope complexity at each site

– Complex – Combination of all the above. Audit time calculation will require approval by OPMT Sub Team

• Use of Advanced Surveillance Reassessment Procedures (ASRP) and Computer Aided Auditing Techniques (CAAT) should be allowed (maximum 30% reduction)

• ASRP shall not in itself be used to justify a reduction

10

Certification Matrix

• Detailed matrix was developed to provide clarification

11

Next Steps

• Deliver special team recommendations to 9104/1 team (July 1, 2010)

– Request incorporation of special teams recommendations into updated 9104/1 draft

• 9104/1 Sub team to continue with development process

– Disposition of all 9104/1 comments

– Ballot updated document

12

Summary

• The Team has delivered a recommendation that was on time and on target

• Recommendation addresses key 9104/1 ballot failure issues - “Show Stoppers”

• IAF representatives agreed to take lesson learned from this effort to drive IAF Mandatory Document changes (e.g. IAF MD 5 – Audit Day Calculations)

• This should be an acceptable go forward proposal that provides for sufficient on site audit time needed for an “Effective” ICOP assessment

13

9104-1 Special Team