community choice - abag.ca.gov · • rapid acceleration in cce formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Community Choice California’s 2.0 & 3.0 EvolutionABAG General Assembly 2018
![Page 2: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CCE Agencies across California
2Source: Local Energy Aggregation Network
Trade Association:
• Rapid acceleration in CCE formation:• 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE• 2019 = 38%• 2020 = 50%• 2025 = 85%
• 16 Agencies at present: • 150 staff & counting• 18 counties• 141 cities• 3.8 million customers• ~4,700 GWh load
• + several forming
![Page 3: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Community Choice CEOs
![Page 4: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
California CCE Snap-Shot
4
![Page 5: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Customers:3.9 Million
2019 Forecast
Electricity:4,700 GWh
Municipalities:18 counties+142 cities= 160 total
![Page 6: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
CCE Staff by Agency & Department (~150 total)
![Page 7: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CCE Local Energy Innovations
7DRAFT — data from CalCCE, CCPartners
• CEC grant application with PG&E• Multi-customer microgrid allows
indefinite islanding of County airport (rural) & US Coast Guard base
• BTM PV, EV charging, EE & DR, CCE-owned 2MW AES & 2MW PV
• Controls for market integration
Microgrid Development
![Page 8: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Rates, Reserves, Energy and Operating Costs
DRAFT — data sources: UCLA Luskin Center & CCPartners (update from CalCCE expected) 8
![Page 9: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Evolution of CCE 2.0 & 3.0 Maturity Models
9
![Page 10: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Context: Rapid Evolution of CCE (2017-18)
10
1. Redwood Coast Energy Authority (Humboldt) led by example2. Public power waded in to help the CCE industry3. Multiple CCEs began hiring experienced CEOs
![Page 11: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Community Choice 2.0 & 3.0 Maturity Models
11
1. Portfolio Management Services2. Virtual Power Plant Services3. In-house Enterprise Data Pipeline4. Other hallmarks:
• CEO with industry experience• Experienced staff in key positions
(energy risk management, data analytics, etc.)
• Comprehensive Risk Policy• Dedicated Risk Committee• Flexibility & at-risk service contracts
• Individual agencies working together• Sharing resources, staff, jointly
contracting for services and power, etc.• Assist new CCE initiatives & avoid re-
inventing the wheel• In future: establishing a separate Joint
Powers Authority (“JPA of CCEs”) to provide advanced services at-scale (low cost)
CCE 3.0: JOINT-ACTIONCCE 2.0: BUSINESS MODEL
Goal: develop institutional capacity so CCE’s (deeply) understand the business
![Page 12: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CCE 2.0: 2017 “Tipping Point” in Sophistication
12
:
![Page 13: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CCE 3.0: current joint-action initiatives
• Sharing best practices• Joint regulatory engagement• Coordination for lobbying• Discussing joint procurement &
shared services
Trade Association: Joint Procurement:
Ongoing Developments• CCEs sharing models/ resources,
discussing joint procurement and shared services
• CCEs assisting new initiatives
![Page 14: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Existing Public Power “Joint Action” Agencies
![Page 15: Community Choice - abag.ca.gov · • Rapid acceleration in CCE formation: • 2014 = 0.5% of utility load served by CCE • 2019 = 38% • 2020 = 50% • 2025 = 85% • 16 Agencies](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070801/5f0293f67e708231d404f56a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CCE 3.0: “JPA of CCEs”• Should we create one?
• How to phase-in across 16+ agencies?• Which functions are provided & when?• Cost allocation issues? • Business case analysis?
• Governance options:• CCE CEOs form Board? • Elected officials on committee?• Role of Community Committees?
• Advantages of scale:• Combined expertise > than sum of parts• Low marginal cost of increasingly
advanced & holistic services• Automatic coordination and
standardization across a range of disciplines, business processes & territories (various benefits)
• ?