communisense: crowdsourcing road hazards in nairobi

29
CommuniSense: Crowdsourcing Road Hazards in Nairobi Darshan Santani Idiap Research Institute and EPFL (Switzerland) Joint work with Jidraph Njuguna, Tierra Bills, Aisha W. Bryant, Reginald Bryant, Jonathan Ledgard and Daniel Gatica-Perez 27 August 2015 | MobileHCI Copenhagen

Upload: darshan-santani

Post on 20-Jan-2017

73 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

CommuniSense: Crowdsourcing Road Hazards in Nairobi

Darshan SantaniIdiap Research Institute and EPFL (Switzerland)

Joint work with Jidraph Njuguna, Tierra Bills, Aisha W. Bryant, Reginald Bryant, Jonathan Ledgard and Daniel Gatica-Perez

27 August 2015 | MobileHCI Copenhagen

Research Objective

Use of mobile crowdsourcing to gather road surface quality information (potholes and speed-bumps) in

Nairobi

State of Transportation in Nairobi

● Modes of Transport

● Pedestrians (30-40% mode share)● Matatus or private mini-buses – lifeline of Nairobians● Taxis● Boda Boda (motorcycles and bicycles)

Salon, Deborah, and Eric M. Aligula. "Urban travel in Nairobi, Kenya: analysis, insights, and opportunities." Journal of Transport Geography, 2012

State of Transportation in Nairobi

● Modes of Transport

● Pedestrians (30-40% share)● Matatus or private mini-buses – lifeline of Nairobians● Taxis● Boda Boda (motorcycles and bicycles)

● Lack of any form of road infrastructure monitoring

● Increase in road accidents and fatalities

Odero, W., Khayesi, M., & Heda, P. M. “Road traffic injuries in Kenya: magnitude, causes and status of intervention”. Injury control and safety promotion, 2003

Research Contributions

DataVerification

Real World Deployment

ResearchIntuition

ResearchChallenges

Road QualitySurvey

Mobile Application

Road Quality Survey

Road Quality Survey

● Objective: Status quo and willingness to participate● Channels: Online (Google Forms) and SMS (mSurvey)● Themes:

● Demographics● Status Quo on Road Quality● Overall Impact of Road Hazards● Reporting Road Hazards

● Response: 880 responses (442 Online & 439 SMS)

Demographics

● Gender: Slightly biased towards male (Online – 62% M and SMS – 58% M)● Age: Surveys cater to different age demographics

● SMS biased towards younger population (18–24 age group: 66%)● Online biased towards relatively older segment (25–34 age group: 47%)

Demographics

● Gender: Slightly biased towards male (Online – 62% M and SMS – 58% M)● Age: Surveys cater to different age demographics

● SMS respondents biased towards younger population (18–24 age group: 66%)● Online respondents biased towards relatively older segment (25–34 age group: 47%)

● Residential Location: High-income neighborhoods represented more in Online

Online (N = 442) SMS (N = 439)

Status Quo on Road Quality

Road quality in residential neighborhood

47% Online and 30% SMS rated poor or very poor

Online

SMS

Potholes as a major road nuisance

79% Online and 67% SMS agreed or strongly agreed

Online

SMS

Impact of Road Hazards

77% considered road hazards to have a major or severe impact on their vehicle’s

wear and tear.

Impact of road hazards on personal travel discomfort

65% Online and 46% SMS caused major or severe impact

Online

SMS

Reporting Road Hazards

● Do you know the process of reporting?● No: 96% – Online and SMS – 77%

● How do you want to report?● Mobile app: Online – 70% and SMS – 4%

● Do you own an Android-based phone?● Yes: Online – 76% and SMS – 50%

User Comments (N = 101)

“Speed bumps are fine as long as they are marked so you don’t just “discover” them with your head on the ceiling and stuff flying in the car. Look at the roads around the hospitals. I am

sure a patient is half killed before they even get to the hospital for treatment …”

“The state of our roads is dismal at best. Networks that were designed for a 90’s population are being used, unchanged in the second decade of the 21st century”

“Road hazards is a major cause of road accidents in Kenya that should be addressed”

● Negligence of the local city council● Personal commentary on the current state of traffic situation in Nairobi● General praise for the survey● Advice to improve status quo

Mobile Application

DataVerification

Road QualitySurvey

Mobile Application

CommuniSense

A mobile application to locate, describe, and photograph road hazards

Full Report Map It!

Field Study

● Days of deployment: 14 days● Users: 30 university students● Collected Data

● Full Reports – 101● Map it! – 153

● Spatial Coverage

Full Reports (N = 99) Map It! (N = 109)

Field Study – Results

Severity of potholes Labeling of speed-bumps

55% encountered unlabeled speed-bumps

57% rated moderate or higher

Lessons Learnt

● Backward Compatibility● Target 2.3 instead of 4+ Android OS

● Cross device testing● Not all devices (Huawei) handle the mapping well● UI/UX matters

Lessons Learnt

● Backward Compatibility● Target 2.3 instead of 4+ Android OS

● Cross device testing● Not all devices (Huawei) handle the mapping well● UI/UX matters

● Simple way to perform closed beta testing● Feature Enhancements

● Upload photo from gallery

Data Verification

DataVerification

Road QualitySurvey

Mobile Application

Potential Malicious Behavior

Citizens ConnectBoston City Council

● Openness of entry –> malicious behavior and sabotage

● Misreporting pervasive in crowdsourcing

● Verification is costly (!)

● MIT DARPA winning entry – 80% entries malicious

J. C. Tang, M. Cebrian, N. A. Giacobe, H.-W. Kim, T. Kim, and D. B. Wickert. “Reflecting on the DARPA Red Balloon Challenge”. CACM, 2011

Data Verification

Do people form consistent and reliable judgments describing a road hazard based on its image?

Data Verification – Results

● Image Labeling: 92% of images verified with the same labels as field users

● Hazard Attributes: 0.90 – 0.71 Intraclass correlation

Smooth Road (MTurk)Speed Bump (Medium, Single, No)

Smooth Road (MTurk)Speed Bump (Medium, Single, No)

Related Work

● Systems for reporting local civic issues

● Smartphone systems for developing countries

● Open Data Kit – https://opendatakit.org/ ● Nokia (now Microsoft) Data Gathering –

https://www.microsoftdatagathering.net

Limitations

● Closing the loop, engaging local authorities in loop● “And I do not trust that the city council would take our com-

plaints seriously.”● “Actual or visible feedbacks would motivate me to report even

paying some costs.”● “I would only report road issues if I thought something would be

done about it. I am not sure that’s currently the case.”

● Incentives to sustain active participation● Spatial coverage – Matthew effect (rich gets richer)

Conclusions

Designed, implemented and tested a mobile crowdsourcing platform which integrates crowd-based verification for a world region that is still

under-represented and under-studied.

Q & A

Email: [email protected]: @SabMayaHai

“The nice thing about potholes is there's a common enemy. Everyone hates it!”