communication and theatre 4/516: leadership seminar structure and organizational design

37
Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Post on 22-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar

Structure and Organizational Design

Page 2: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Morgan: from bureaucracies to networks (six models of structure)•Rigid bureaucracy (chain of command)

Page 3: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

bureaucracy with senior management team

Page 4: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

bureaucracy with project teams and task forces

Page 5: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

•Matrix for an aircraft company

Design

Production

Marketing

Civilian Commercial Military

Thus each type of project must cooperate with each department at every level

Page 6: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

The project organization (a network of interaction)

Page 7: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

The loosely-coupled organic network (outsource, subcontract)

Page 8: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Nohria: characteristics of networks (which are the communication links we maintain.)

Page 9: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Because of complexity and information overload, the way to keep up is to belong to a sufficient number of networks to ensure access to information needed somewhere in the network system.

Page 10: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Characteristics of networks:

organizations are social networks (formal & informal)

Page 11: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

an organization exists in and participates in a sea of networks.

Page 12: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Individual actions are a result of position in the networks.

Page 13: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

networks inform actions, and actions shape networks (reflexivity).

Page 14: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Advantages of looking at organizations as networks:

Centrality in networks is a source of power.

Page 15: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Advantages, cont.

One can be a central member in a group

Page 16: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Advantages, cont. One can be a link between groups

Page 17: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Advantages, cont. One can belong to many groups

Steve’s memberships: spouse, father, grandfather, son, uncle, father-in-law, teacher, colleague, Provost’s council, union, elearning trainee, friends, fisherman, muscian, church, aarp, nca, costco, seattle art museum, YAM, PBS, KEMC, man, older, home owner, etc.

Page 18: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Advantages, cont.

Who gets to play (be involved in a project) is dependent on chooser’s networks

Page 19: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Advantages, cont.

In a very dense network system, alliances among companies can be formed.

Page 20: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Advantages, cont.

Networks are a distinct form of organizing

•efficient,

•governable,

•flexible,

•linking pin.

Page 21: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Fisher: self-directed work teams, or we must use our human resources.I like the empowerment formula

e (empowerment) = f (functionality)

Page 22: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

f = authority +

resources +

information +

accountability

http://scholar.google.com/schhp?ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tab=ws

http://tinyurl.com/38td5h

Page 23: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Review this and come to class being able to state why empowerment = 0 if any of A,R,I,A = 0.

Page 24: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

The Empowerment Continuum

low high

Employee Suggestions

Task Forces,

Quality Circles

Self-Directed Work Teams

Page 25: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Comparing SDWT with Traditional Orgs.

Customer driven, multi-skilled workforce

vs.

management-driven work force of isolated specialists

Page 26: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Few job descriptions

vs.

Many jobs descriptions

Mention job description

Page 27: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Information shared widely

vs.

Information limited

Page 28: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Few levels of

management

vs.

Many levels of

management

Page 29: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Whole business focus

vs.

Departmental focus

Welcome to the Department of Communication and

Theatre

Page 30: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Shared goals

vs.

Segregated goals

Page 31: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Purpose achievement emphasis

vs.

problem-solving emphasis

Page 32: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

High worker commitment

vs.

High management commitment

Page 33: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Continuous improvements

vs.

Incremental improvements

Page 34: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Self controlled

vs.

management controlled

Page 35: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Values based

vs.

Policy/procedures based

Page 36: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design

Smith & Sims: teams at the top, or at least it takes commitment of top management to encourage teamwork throughout the organization

Page 37: Communication and Theatre 4/516: Leadership Seminar Structure and Organizational Design