combining vicarious and enactive training in is: does order matter?

Combining vicarious and enactive training in IS : Does order matter ?

PIERRE-MAJORIQUE LÉGER, Ph.D.Co-director Tech3Lab, HEC MontréalFÉLIX G. LAFONTAINEHEC MontréalÉLISE LABONTE-LEMOYNE, Ph.D.HEC MontréalPATRICK CHARLAND, Ph.D.Université du Québec à Montréal PAUL CRONAN, Ph.D.University of Arkansas

GARTNER PREDICTS :

‘‘By 2017, most business users will have access to technologies that will enable them to prepare and analyze data’’ Source :Parenteau, J., Chandler, N., L. Salam, R., Laney D., D. Duncan, A. Predicts 2015: Power Shift in Business Intelligence and Analytics Will Fuel Disruption (ID: G00270932). Retrieved from Gartner database. (2014, November 21)

Dashboard and user attentional efficiency

© Copyright Tech3Lab 2016

Research goals and hypothesisCombination of enactive learning and vicarious learning leads to greater learning outcomes, but in which order ?

H1 : Vicarious training accelerates the attentional efficiency of the learner.H2 : Order does not impact learning outcome


Experimental Design


VICARIOUS TRAINING ▪ 15 minutes demonstration video including a voiceover

explaining the different principles that guided the creations of the different indicators and which of them were useful in the context of a given task.

ENACTIVE TRAINING ▪ 15 minutes enactive training in which the participants

were asked to perform a task in the simulated busi-ness environment, i.e. ERPsim (Montréal, Canada) using an online dashboard and a SAP GUI.

CONDITION 1

CONDITION 2

FIRST TRAINING

SECOND TRAINING

VICARIOUS

VICARIOUS

ENACTIVE

ENACTIVE


Experimental StimuliERPSIM

ONLINE DASHBOARD

4 Types of Indicators

▪ useful information, well presented

▪ useful information, badly presented

▪ useless in-formation, well presented

▪ useless information, badly presented

Lab Serious games to learn enterprise systems and business analytics

1234

1

2 3

4

Sample indicators for the inventory data


Tobii EyeTracker X60


Instruments ▪ ERPsim Simulation Game (Logistics Version)

▪ Tobii X60 EyeTracker

▪ Online Self-Refreshing Dashboard

MeasuresAttentional efficiency (Eyetracking measure)

▪ Average Visit Duration

Learning Outcomes ▪ Learning (Objective and Perceived Knowledge)

▪ Dashboard Self-Efficacy

▪ Satisfaction with the learning process

▪ Enterprise System Management Knowledge


Pre Questionnaire Post Questionnaire

Pre Questionnaire Post Questionnaire

Vicarious Training(15 minutes)

Vicarious Training(15 minutes)

Enactive Training(15 minutes)

Enactive Training(15 minutes)

Experiment Timeline

Condition 1

Condition 2

T1 (�rst 5m) T3 (last 5m)


ResultsATTENTIONAL EFFICIENCY

LEARNING OUTCOMES

▪ Average Visit Duration :

▪ Learning (Objective and Perceived Knowledge)

▪ Dashboard Self-Efficacy

▪ Satisfaction with the learning process

▪ Enterprise System Management Knowledge


Eye fixations Triangulation and machine learning

Visualization of emotion and/or cognitive states at fixation

Next step ENABLING THE VISUALIZATION OF TRIANGULATED ATTENTION, EMOTIONAL, AND COGNITIVE MEASURES.

Courtemanche, F., P.-M. Léger, M. Frédette, S. Sénécal, and A. Dufresne (2015) Method and Product for Visualizing the Emo-tions of a User, Provisional patent application. US 62/121,552 p. 14.

PATENT PENDING


Dashboard visual efficiency: Bar Chart vs Bubble Chart

BAR CHART BUBBLE CHART


BAR CHART

BUBBLE CHART

POSITIVE VALENCE AT FIXATION

NEGATIVE VALENCE AT FIXATION

PUPIL DILATION AT FIXATION



POSITIVE VALENCE AT FIXATION

NEGATIVE VALENCE AT FIXATION

PUPIL DILATION AT FIXATION

BAR CHART

BUBBLE CHART


Thank you!

combining vicarious and enactive training in is: does order matter?

Education