coca cola - anaysis
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
1/33
Analysis 6
#1 Organizations and Organizational Effectiveness 6
#2 Stakeholders, Managers, and Ethics 9
#4 Organizational Design 10
#5 Designing Organizational Structure: Authority & Control 13
#6 Designing Organizational Structure: Specialization & Coordination 15
#3 Managing in a Changing Global Environment 16
#8 Organizational Design & Strategy 19
#7 Creating & Managing Organizational Culture 21
#9 Organizational Technology 21
#11 Organizational Transformations: Birth et al. 23
#12 Decision Making 25
#14 Managing Conflict, Power, and Politics 26
Works Cited 28
Appendices 32
Abstract
The subsequent paper contains a comprehensive analysis of The Coca-Cola Company and addresses several
organizational theory issues. Three recommendations are proposed based on the problems that were
discovered during the analysis. The goals of the recommendations are to address uncertainty with suppliers and
distributors, and also align company decision-making with the structure of the organization.
Recommendations
Recommendation 1
The Coca-Cola Company has a high level of uncertainty when it comes to the raw materials it uses. For a
few of the ingredients, the company only has one or two viable suppliers. This could be extremely
problematic for a variety of reasons. The Coca-Cola Company has less bargaining power if there is little
substitutability in suppliers. Another problem could arise if a supplier experiences an event that economically
devastates them. If a supplier goes bankrupt, or is in some type of natural disaster, The Coca- Cola Company
would suffer greatly as well.
The Coca-Cola Company can improve and secure relationships with suppliers using afew tactics such as
minority ownership or strategic alliances. The most optimal method would be to use backward vertical
integration and purchase a supplier. The results of such a strategy would allow the company to keep profits
that used to be earned by the supplier, save on costs, and have a reliable source of supplies. Besides the
actual purchase of the organization, another costly aspect of vertical integration is high bureaucratic costs
(Jones, 2007).
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
2/33
The Coca-Cola Company should look at buying the following companies: The NutraSweet Company, Ajinomoto
Co., Inc., Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH, or Tate & Lyle. These companies are
one of two possible suppliers for important raw materials (Annual Report, 2006). Although the company has
not experienced significant problems, future events are always uncertain. The most secure way to control
suppliers for a company is through ownership. Whileownership of a sugar/sweetener company is clearly out of
the companys domain, the move would make their core business more profitable. The Coca-Cola Company
wouldbe able to purchase one of these companies through financing. The organizationhas a high credit rating
and, therefore, would be able to raise money for the acquisition at a low cost.
Recommendation 2
The Coca-Cola Companys decision making process does not fit into its structure or mission, vision, and values.
Their decision making process is more centralized,and when compared to everything else going on at The
Coca-Cola Company, it does not match. The Coca-Cola Company has a more organic structure and their
mission and values preach creativity and employee involvement. They would improve theirdecision making and
enforce their organic structure by implementing a strategy fororganizational learning. They can begin by
shaking things up more often bychanging managers for different departments on a periodical basis. This will
force managers to think outside the box when making decisions (Jones, 2007). This will also enforce alearning organization and instill the organic culture into everyones mind frame. Because of this, The Coca-
Cola Company will have theability to solve large problems more quickly and become a stronger community as
a result.
Another way The Coca-Cola Company could match their decision making skills to their structure is by making
sure employees do get involved. They should implement an open door policy in which any employee can go
to their manager and suggest ideas for solving different problems. This will allow the management to become
aware of small problems before they become large ones.
By changing their decision making process, they will also become more accustomed to their recently adopted
mission, vision, and values. They will inspire optimism in all stakeholders by making decisions in a timelier
manner.
This will show stakeholders that The Coca-Cola Company has a great outlook for thefuture because problems
will seem like less of an obstacle for them. By including more, lower level employees in their decision making
process, they are promoting leadership and inspiring collaboration and innovation.
Recommendation 3
The Coca-Cola Company has become highly criticized for the actions of its bottling partners in Colombia. The
bottling company is alleged to have killed employees due to their ties with a union, and even while The Coca-Cola Company does not own that plant, The Coca-Cola Company has been the target of boycotts and
lawsuits.
Even if The Coca-Cola Company was unaware and uninvolved in what happened, their name is attached to
the product. In order to make the situation better, The Coca- Cola Company should buy the bottling
partners in Colombia. The company can use its resources to create stable bottling plants. Managers would
need to work with union leaders to create an agreement that was fair for both sides. While taking over and
running the plants would cost the organization money, the company would have full control over the activities
of managers. This increased accountability and dedication to correcting any wrong doings would garner some
positive publicity for the companys operations, and provide the benefit of having a stable distribution channelin the region.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
3/33
Although the organization does not own most of their bottling plants, acquiring the Colombian bottlers would
provide The Coca-Cola Company with the ability to foster better relationships with the citizens of the country.
This acquisition would cost the company money in the short-term, but it could provide fruitful benefits in
years to come.
Analysis
#1 Organizations and Organizational Effectiveness
What allows an organization to continue to operate for over 125 years, and along the way, become one of
the most globally recognizable brand names? The ability to adapt and find new markets has helped Coca-
Cola become an icon of the American culture. Coca-Cola was invented in 1885 and since The Coca-Cola
Companys incorporation in 1892 (Coca-Cola, 2007), a strong focus on growth and marketing has existed.
Besides traditional advertisements in the local newspaper, the companys founder, Asa Candler, distributed
thousands of coupons for free glasses of Coca-Cola so that many more people would be inclined to taste
the
product (Thecoca-colacompany.com). He also distributed countless souvenirs that depicted the Coca-Cola
trademark logo. By 1900, the organization, already, had operations in the United States and Canada. Thisfocus on aggressive marketing is, still, the cornerstone for The Coca-Cola Companys strategy and culture.
The Coca-Cola Company was eager to take advantage of new markets, and expansion efforts quickly led to
Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines (Thecoca-colacompany.com). Before long, Coca-Cola was
being sold in Europe. When The United States entered World War II, Coca-Cola was being sold to both
sides. The Coca-Cola Company turned what many would view as a threat, into an enormous opportunity. In
1941, the companys president, Robert Woodruff made an order to provide American troops with Coca-
Cola, regardless of where they were, and what it cost to the company. During the war, 64 bottling plants
were set up in Europe and the Pacific. This not only allowed American troops to acquire a taste for the drink,
but it left Coca-Cola with a solid foundation to greatly expand its operations overseas.
Over time, The Coca-Cola Company has remained adamant about staying in the non-alcoholic beverage
industry. Besides soft drinks, The Coca-Cola Company sells energy drinks, juice drinks, sports drinks, tea, and
water. The current focus of The Coca-Cola Company is still that of growth. The current objective of the
organization is to use our formidable assets-brands, financial strength, unrivaled distribution system, global
reach, and a strong commitment by ourmanagement and employees worldwide-to achieve long-term
sustainable growth (AnnualReport, 2006, p.33).
The key inputs for production are the raw materials used in the beverages. The company uses different types
of sweeteners depending on where the concentrate is being produced (Annual Report, 2006). Water is one ofthe main ingredients used in every beverage. Since the organization greatly focuses on marketing, human
capital is an important asset to the company as well. Without its employees knowledge and abilities, The
Coca-Cola Company would not be nearly as successful. The secret formula for Coca-Cola is another key
input for the company.
The Coca-Cola Company does not actually produce soda. They produce theconcentrate or syrup, which is
then sent to distributors (Annual Report, 2006). Distributors add carbonated water and any other ingredient
necessary to create the final product. The production process of Coca-Cola is a secret; however, it mainly
consists of adding the correct amount of ingredients, and mixing them. Theprocess to create each beverage is
extremely mechanized in order to achieve quick and efficient production (Thecoca-colacompany.com). Theoutputs of The Coca-Cola Company are the syrups and concentrates of its beverages.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
4/33
The Coca-Cola Company faces a number of challenges, many of which stem fromthe fact that the
organization operates on such a large level. Each market has its own trends and demands. Consumers in
some markets have become more heath conscious (Annual Report, 2006). In order to react to this trend, many
diet and low-calorie drinks have been created. The Coca-Cola Company is always trying to find ways to be
innovate. Due to the anti-carbohydrate trends created by the Atkins diet,Coca-Cola C2 was introduced. It
is supposed to have the same taste as Coca-Cola, but contain half the carbohydrates (Coca-Cola C2, 2007).
Another problem The Coca-Cola Company faces is derived from the social andpolitical differences of eachmarket. For example, different countries have different laws. Most developing countries have more relaxed
pollution requirements. In some countries, bribes of government officials are considered normal and
expected. While it is company policy that The Coca-Cola Company will follow the laws of every country that
it operates in, it still has strongcriticism from other parts of the world for its actions (Thecoca-
colacompany.com).
The company has recently been the subject of strong criticism the companys bottling plants in Colombia are
alleged to have killed workers who were attempting to unionize (Online extra, 2006). Even though the
bottling plants are independently owned and operated, and nothing has happened legally to the bottling plants
in Colombia, The Coca-Cola Company has been facing strong criticism for it in the United States.
TheCoca-Cola Companys structure has characteristics of both organic and mechanistic models. The
organization has a more centralized structure, however in recent years there has been a movement towards
decentralization. A more in-depth analysis of the organizations structure will be discussed later.
The Coca-Cola Company measures success in many ways. The Coca-Cola Company believes that if they
analyze sales based on volume growth (gallons and units sold), it is an indicator of trends at the consumer
level (Annual Report,2006).The company obviously looks at profit as a way to measure success. Recently,
The Coca-Cola Company has been focused on being a more responsible global citizen. The company has over
70 clean-water projects in countries all across the globe (McKay, 2007). Attached in the appendices is a
performance chart that the company uses to measure success in terms of people, portfolio, partners/planet,
and partners/profit (Corporate Responsibility Review, 2006).
#2 Stakeholders, Managers, and Ethics
The stakeholders for The Coca-Cola Company as stated in the companys Corporate Responsibility Review
(2006) are shareowners, our people, bottling partners, governmental agencies, suppliers, retail customers,
consumers, and local communities (p.16).
Because each group of stakeholders has a different goal, conflicts arise. The shareowners are concerned with
earning a profit, while local communities care deeply about environmental issues and labor standards.
Suppliers want to charge as much as possible to create more revenues, and The Coca-Cola Company wants
to get the lowest prices to decrease costs. Management wants to keep labor costs down, while employees
want raises and increased benefits.
A hierarchy of the organizations corporate structure is located in the appendices (Reuters.com) The
organizations divisional managers run company operations in a general region of the globe. The functions of
each vice president are divided into functions such as human resources, innovation/research and development,
marketing, and public affairs and communication (Reuters.com). The two functions most critical in taking
advantage of the companys competitive advantages are marketing and innovation/research and development.
As stated time and time again, the organization tries to capitalize on its brand name as much as possible,
which is why the marketing function is so important to the company. The
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
5/33
innovation/research and development department must come up with the products thatthe marketing
function demands.
The majority of the top level managers at The Coca-Cola Company have worked in many different regions
and areas of the company. Many have worked for or ran the bottling companies that partner with the
organization (Thecoca- colacompany.com). The fact that members of the top management team have well
rounded backgrounds allow for problems to be looked at from multiple angles.
#4 Organizational Design
The Coca-Cola Company realizes that it needs to be able to meet the ever changing demands of its customers.
This is why the company pushed towards decentralization in the nineties, and even more so recently. The
organization has two operating groups called Bottling Investments and Corporate. There are also operating
groups divided by different regions such as: Africa, Eurasia, European Union, Latin America, North America,
and Pacific. Each of these divisions is again divided into geographic regions. By allowing decisions to be made
on a more local level, the organization can quickly respond to changing market demands, and
higher-level management can focus more on long-term planning. Country Managers
(2), an article that appeared in Business Europe (2002) had the following information: According to Jon
Chandler, director of communications for Europe, the responsibility for getting it right and for profit is
firmly at the local level (p.3).
Certain divisions of the company, such as finance, human resources, innovation, marketing, and strategy and
planning are centrally located within the Corporate division of the company. Some of these functions take
place at lower
levels in each of the regions of the company; however, most decisions are made at the top of the hierarchy.
For example, in 2002 the decision to sponsor the World Cup was done at the corporate level. Corporate
headquarters, however, allowed the local divisions to make the advertising decisions (Country managers (2),
2002). This allowed each division to specifically design commercials and ads that would appeal to the local
market.
When Neville Isdell took over as CEO and chairmen of The Coca-Cola Companyin 2004, he began to using
more complex integrating mechanisms. In order to deal with organizations extremely low growth rate, Isdell
used teams of top managers to create solutions to the organizations most pressing problems. Face-to-face
meetings were held regularly at the local levels so employees could remain informed. Besides the use of teams
and meetings, the intranet was overhauled to provide a source of real-time sharing of information (Fox, 2007).
The use of complex integrating mechanisms is important in such a tall and wide organization. It is important
that each function of the company is able to share up-to-date information quickly with each other.
The organization seems to be doing an excellent job of balancing standardizationand mutual adjustment. The
Code of Conduct for the organization is a guidebook for how every employee should act (Thecoca-
colacompany.com). Should an employee act improperly, they are subject to disciplinary actions. Due to the
changes implemented by Isdell, mutual adjustment has started to play a larger role in the organization.
Employees feel more engaged and turnover has been reduced. Isdells changes have led to increased growth
rates for the organization, and return on equity for stockholders went from a negative return to a 20
percent return (Fox,2007). This balance is essential, because it allows employees some flexibility,but also gives
the organization some predictability (Jones, 2007).
The Coca-Cola Companys structure is a hybrid of both mechanistic and organic models. The focal point of
The Coca-Cola Company is on responsiveness. The complex integrating mechanisms previously discussed are
characteristic of an organic structure. The surveys and interviews used by the company allowed information
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
6/33
to flow from the bottom-up, and the intranet allows for information to be exchanged laterally. The surveys
have also caused The Coca-Cola Company to pursue simplification and standardization (Thecoca-
colacompany.com). Centralization and high standardization are associated with a mechanistic structure.
Mechanistic Organic
Focus Efficiency, stability Flexibility, responsiveness
Specialization High Low
Integrating Mechanisms Simple Complex
Centralization High Low
Standardization High Low
Communication Top-down Network (top-down, bottom-up, lateral)
The blending of both types of structures seems to be ideal for the organization. Flexibility is essential when
trying to appeal to such a vast number of independent markets, however, high standardization is important
to remain efficient in production. The use of complex integrating mechanisms allows for easier coordination
for the global company. Centralization keeps organizational choices aligned with organizational goals. Now that
information in the company is flowing in every direction, upper-management will have access to information
more quickly, adding to the organizations flexibility and responsiveness. The recent shift towards a more
decentralized and organic structure corresponds with the uncertainty of the organizations environment, which
will be discussed later.
#5 Designing Organizational Structure: Authority & Control
The Coca-Cola Company currently employs approximately 71,000 employees. According to a general
organizational chart obtained from the companys website, there are at least 5 hierarchical levels at the
corporate level. For example: the
head of the Canadian division reports to the president and COO of the North American Group. That president
reports to the CFO, who reports to the Office of the General Counsel. The General Counsel then reports to
the CEO. It is fair to assume that there are at least a few more steps in the hierarchy at the local level.
Due to its tall structure, the organization has experienced communication problems. One of the problems
discovered through the survey mentioned before was that the people and the company lacked clear goals(Fox, 2007). Tall hierarchies also cause motivation problems, which is why the organization is attempting to get
employees more engaged (Arendt, Ch.5). The increased usefulness of the companys intranet will greatly
increase the communication between every level of employees, and allow upper management to effectively
communicate to the front line employees.
Based on information from Re This span of control seems somewhat slim for the CEO of such a large
organization. The CEO is also a member of the Senior Leadership Team. This team consists of each head of
the eight operating groups aforementioned, and also has other top executives in areas like innovation and
technology and marketing. Although there are only six people that answer directly to the CEO, the CEO is able
to receive input from a wide variety of divisions because of this leadership team. Since the team is comprised ofmembers from various divisions, the CEO is able to obtain a wide variety of information.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
7/33
The move to decentralization has caused structural changes for The Coca-Cola Company. New offices have
been opened to facilitate decisions being made closer to the local markets (Annual Review, 2006). The
organization has also undergone centralization of some of the companys departments. In 2006, the Bottling
Investments division was created to establish internal organization for our consolidated bottling operations
and our unconsolidated bottling investments (Annual Report, 2006, p.2). It appears that the organization is
striving for a hybrid structure, which allows them to have advantages of both mechanistic and organic
structures, while trying to minimize the negative consequences of each.
The strategic structural changes that the organization has gone through in recent years have created a much
needed positive impact on the company. Sales growth increased and employees are much more satisfied
(Fox, 2007). The organization is trying to create a more innovative culture by pushing towards
decentralization. It looks as if the company is not content with following trends in the beverage industry, but
looking to be on the forefront of new and exciting products.
#6 Designing Organizational Structure: Specialization & Coordination
The Coca-Cola Company realizes that a divisional structure gives the organization the best opportunity to react
to the changes in its uncertain environment, but also allow it to maintain a level of stability.
The multidivisional structure is beneficial for the organization for a variety of reasons. The division based on
geographic region allows certain aspects of the companys operations to be tailored to the individual market.
One advertising campaign or slogan may not be appropriate for another market, so decisions about specific
ads are made closer to the individual markets. Multidivisional structures allow divisional managers to handle
daily operations while corporate managers are free to focus on long-term planning (Jones, 2007).
There are also problems associated with this type of structure. If the company creates divisional competition,
coordination may decrease because each division wants to have an advantage over everyone else.
Communication problems may also exist because information can become distorted when it has to travel up
and down tall hierarchies (Jones, 2007).
A multidivisional matrix structure may be better suited for The Coca-Cola Company.This would increase
coordination between corporate and divisional levels, and managers at each level would work together to
create solutions to problems. While such a structure may be too complex for a global organization, the
company may want to look into it.
#3 Managing in a Changing Global Environment
Due to its tremendous global presence, The Coca-Cola Company operates in an extremely uncertain
environment. Increased competition from global and local companies has led to competition over the most
important resource: customers. The Coca-Cola Company must not only compete for customers, but also raw
materials needed for each product. In some parts of the world, clean water is becoming increasingly hard to
come by. The Coca-Cola Company has only one or two suppliers for some of its raw materials. For
example, they view The NutraSweet Company as
one of only two viable sources for the ingredient aspartame (Annual Report, 2006). The Coca-Cola Company is
at a strong disadvantage if they cannot decrease their reliance on a small number of suppliers. If relations with
suppliers deteriorate, or if the suppliers go bankrupt, it would have dire consequences for The Coca-Cola
Company.
The Coca-Cola Company must also compete to get the best employees possible. Theproduction of the
beverages does not require skilled labor, but the organization has had problems finding the proper personnel
to run the organization. In 2004, The Coca-Cola Companys top choices for the open CEO position decided not
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
8/33
to join the company because they did not like the actions of the Board of Directors (McKayand Terhune,
2004).
Due to the organizations high credit rating, the company has the ability to raise funds at a lower cost (Annual
Report, 2006). This allows the organization the opportunity to finance operations such as expansion through the
issuance of debt. This may be necessary if The Coca-Cola Company looks to expand into new markets,or
purchase new brands.
The environment in which The Coca-Cola Company operates in is extremely dynamic. The environment is
difficult to predict and control due to the global nature of the operations. The Coca-Cola Company faces the
threat of reduced production or disruption in distribution if there is a problem in a market. The Annual Report
(2006) lists risks, such as worker strikes, work stoppages, and the chance a distributor falls on harsh economic
times. Another reason the companys environment is tremendously dynamic is due to the nature of their raw
materials. Some of their key raw materials are dependent on specific climates (Annual
Report). Climate changes may impact the price of the materials they need to obtain and, in turn, affect the
cost of production.
The strength and interconnectedness of the general forces that The Coca-Cola Company must deal withmake the environment extremely complex. Recently in the United States, two forces have started to become
inter-woven: cultural/social values and political/environmental forces. Many American companies are now
being lambasted if they do not try to be more environmentally friendly, and The Coca- Cola Company is no
different. The company has received plenty of criticism for its operations in India, with claims that they cause
a great deal of pollution and have damaged local water supplies (Online extra, 2006).
Dynamism Low (stable) High (dynamic) Munificence Abundant Scarce Abundant Scarce Complexity
Few Many Few Many Few Many Few Many
Low High
Environmental Uncertainty
The Coca-Cola Company uses a wide variety of techniques to manage relationships with its stakeholders, the
most useful tool being strategic alliances. A former CEO of the organization claimed that 100 percent of its
revenues came from strategic alliances (The science of alliance, 1998). The company uses exclusive contracts
with its bottling partners and other customers as well (Annual Report, 2006). In 1999, the organization signed a
ten-year deal with Burger King to be the restaurants only supplier of beverages. Even though PepsiCo was
willing to give Wendys a much better deal, the restaurant signed a ten-year deal with The Coca-Cola
Company (Deogun & Gibson, 1999). This example shows how powerful the Coca-Cola brand name really
is.
The Coca-Cola Company has done an excellent job managing some aspects of the environment, but done a
poor job at managing other parts of the environment. The negative publicity received from its operations in
India and the actions of its bottling partner in Colombia has led to boycotts of Coca-Cola products on some
campuses (Online extra, 2006). While this is clearly bad for the company, the average consumer is
completely unaware of these allegations. This means that The Coca-Cola Company is doing a decent job of
damage control.
While the company has not had any trouble with suppliers lately, the future is always uncertain. It does not
seem like the company is not actively trying to secure supplies, which is why vertical integration was
recommended.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
9/33
#8 Organizational Design & Strategy
The core competences that give the organization its best competitive advantages are its strong brand name
and its network of bottlers and distributors. Along with its marketing capabilities and broad portfolio of
products, The Coca- Cola Company has core competences which are extremely difficult, if not impossible to
duplicate.
The strong Coca-Cola brand name gives the company a great deal of bargaining power and leverage. In 1999,
PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company were fighting to become the supplier of beverages for the Wendys
restaurant chain. Wendys opted to partner with The Coca-Cola Company even though PepsiCo was offering
much more money (Deogun & Gibson, 1999). The brand name recognition that the company enjoys is a
powerful bargaining tool. The Coca-Cola name even has an influence on consumer tastes. When The Coca-
Cola Company was looking to launch Diet Coke, they performed some blind taste tests with consumers.
The consumers preferred a glass labeled Diet Coke over a glass labeled Tab by 12 percent, even
though the liquids in each glass were identical (Plasketes, 2004). It has taken the organization over 120 years
to build such a strong brand preference, and this cannot be imitated by competitors.
The relationships that the organization has with its distributors areanother competitive advantage that cannot
easily be imitated. The contracts and relationships between the two groups create symbiotic
interdependencies, whichmean that the success of both companies has a direct impact on each other
(Arendt, Ch.3). The Coca-Cola Company agrees not to sell to other parties in the local market, and the bottler
agrees to only purchase the syrup and concentrate from the companys authorized dealers. The Coca-Cola
Company at times provides the retailers and distributors with promotions, and capital at times (Annual
Report,2006). Because the organization does not have to worry about the distribution in the local markets, it
allows the company to focus on more important issues.
The Coca-Cola Companys business-level strategy is one of differentiation.This is evident in the previous
example of consumers preferring identical beverages just because the Coke brand name was attached. They
have been successful pursuing differentiation because the focus of the company has always been on
marketing. The Coca-Cola Company is known for innovative marketing that constantly promotes their brand
names and protects their domains from competitors (Jones, 2007, p.211).
The Coca-Cola Company needs to improve upon its portfolio of brand names. More specifically, the
organization needs to start introducing new types of beverages, as opposed to entering markets late. The
company was late to enter the sports and energy drink markets, as well as the blossoming coffee drink
market (Morris, 2006). If The Coca-Cola Company were able to create an entirely new type of beverage, it
would be alone in the market for a period of time and force competitors to react instead of act.
The hybrid structure of The Coca-Cola Company is ideal for its differentiation strategy. The centralization of
the marketing and innovation functions allows the company to retain control over development, marketing
and production. By performing extensive market research and creating more local offices, the company is
always looking for new ways to serve new customers. The use of complex integrating mechanisms allows
coordination between all levels anddivisions of the company.
#7 Creating & Managing Organizational Culture
The culture of The Coca-Cola organization is mission driven; focused on refreshing the mind, inspiring
optimism, and making a difference (Thecoca- colacompany.com). The rich history of the organization has
allowed the company to compile hundreds of stories of consumers and employees. These stories share real lifeexamples of what Coca-Cola means to their consumers and gives employees a sense of pride to be apart of
something that means so much for so many people. They also inspire new employees to make a positive
impact on the world. Stories are so important to The Coca-Cola Company that they created a museum in
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
10/33
Las Vegas that focuses on the stories of customers. After visitors heard others stories, they could record their
own, which the company could use in the future (McLellan,2006).
As stated previously, the company has been trying to change the culture by allowing employees to essentially
shape and reform the goals of The Coca-Cola Company (Fox, 2007). The positive stories that the company
chooses to focus on provide a foundation to encourage employees to be not only model workers, but model
citizens.
#9 Organizational Technology
Currently, output processes are the greatest source of uncertainty for the organization. As previously stated,
The Coca-Cola Company does not produce the end product. Distributors and bottlers mix other ingredients
(mainly carbonated water) with syrups and concentrates and then sell the products. The Coca-Cola brand
name is on the end product, regardless of who bottles it. The company must keep pressure on the bottlers
to maintain high quality outputs, or it could have negative consequences for The Coca-Cola Company.
There exists very little information about the production of the Coca-Cola syrup. Even at The World of Coca-
Cola, a museum for the company, there is no mention of how the syrup is produced (Friedman, 1992).
Based on assumptions, and some available information, the organization has a moderately high level ofcomplexity due to the fact that it uses mass production. Task variability in production is low because it is
extremely mechanized and routine. As a result, task analyzability is high. When a problem occurs, it is not hard
to find solutions.
The production of Dasani, the companys bottled water, is extremely mechanized, and it is fair to assume
that the production of every Coca-Cola product is the same (Thecoca-colacompany.com). This mass
production and high mechanization leads to a high level of technical complexity. Classification Level of
Technical Complexity Small-Batch and Unit Production Low to Medium Large-Batch and Mass Production
Medium to High Continuous Process or Flow Production High
The typical structure of a manufacturing company that uses mass production is a mechanistic structure, in
which efficient production is the desired end (Arendt, Ch9). The Coca-Cola Companys structure is unique in
that it has a lot of the characteristics of an organic structure. This is due to its focus on marketing and local
appeal. The structural mismatch means that production in the organization may not be as efficient as
possible; however, the benefits of the organizations structure outweigh the consequences.
#11 Organizational Transformations: Birth et al.
The Coca-Cola Company was founded in 1888 to take advantage of the already popular Coca-Cola name.
Of the four life cycle stages (birth, growth, decline, death), after 120 years, the company remains in the growth
stage because the companys value creation skills continue to evolve (Arendt, Ch.11).
The company has faced a variety of internal problems over the years. A constant struggle in any organization is
trying to meet employees demands while trying to keep labor costs low. In 2005, workers went on strike
because management wanted to institute a policy where employees would pay a greater portion of their health
benefits (Business Insurance, 2005). If the organization experiences any work stoppage, the company may not
be able to meet customer demand and lose out on revenue. Another internal problem within the company is
that the board exercises a great deal of power and influence. As previously stated, the company failed to
attract its top choices for CEO in 2004, and the board has even pulled ads because they thought the
commercials did not fit the companys image (MacArthur, 2004).
Uncertainty in the environment has caused many external problems for the organization, ranging from
uncertainty with its suppliers and distributors to political and societal pressures. These issues were discussed in
section 3.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
11/33
The Coca-Cola Company experienced overwhelming growth in its early years. Aspreviously stated, Coca-
Cola was being sold in Canada just eight years after the organization was founded.
While progressing through each stage in Greiners Model of Organizational Growth, The Coca-Cola Company
experienced a myriad of problems. The progression through each stage is detailed in Analysis Module #11,
located in the appendices. What will be discussed here are the changes in the organization which came as a
result of the challenges.
The board of directors has pulled ads from running because they felt the ads did not fit with the companys
image (MacArthur, 2004), which created a crisis of autonomy. While there was not information regarding
policy changes because of this, many believe that the power of the board will diminish because longtime
director Warren Buffet has stepped down. Buffet has been viewed as rather conservative and also involved
himself in the decision making of the organization (Santioli, 2006).
As the company has continued to grow, top managers have pushed operational responsibility and decision
making down to the local levels. This move allows the company to react better to each market, and it also
allows corporate managers to concentrate on strategic and long-term planning.
By allowing lower level managers to become intricately involved in the companys growth efforts, Neville Isdell(the current CEO) created an environment in which everyone felt responsible for the companys performance
(Fox, 2007). He has also promoted employees within the organization, which aligns both the goals of the
managers and the organization (Jones, 2007). The fifth and final stage of Greiners model is focused on
reducing bureaucracy to speed up decision making (Jones, 2007). In April 2007, COO Muhtar Kent stated that
the company is focusing on simplifying the structure to reduce bureaucracy (Seekingalpha.com).
The text book postulates that an organization in this stage would be wise to pursue a product team or matrix
structure. Because The Coca-Cola Company only operates in one domain and has over 400 products, the
product team structure would be too costly and unrealistic. A matrix structure would be an idea worth
considering; however the organization uses divisions based on geography, not product. Due to lack of
information about the companys regional structure, it is hard to say whether the com pany should pursue a
matrix structure or remain as a multidivisional structure.
#12 Decision Making
The majority of decisions made by The Coca-Cola Company are done so by using the incremental method.
Each year, the company would analyze results, and thenmake slight changes in operations to create better
results next year. The companydoes not just quickly decide to create a new product, or change operations.
Drastic changes take time. Recently, realizing that the company was in desperate need for a drastic change,
Isdell sought to figure out why the company performance was declining. By starting at the lower levels of theorganization to find solutions, the company was able to make some drastic changes to the companys culture,
how employees were rewarded, and made efforts to get employees more involved (Fox, 2007). The changes
brought on by using the unstructured decision making model created much better results for the company.
One of the biggest flaws in the organization is that the board of directorsis responsible for some of the non-
programmed decisions made by the company. When The Coca-Cola Company was seeking to purchase
Quaker Oats, the deal was almost finalized, but then stopped because the board felt the price was too high
(Deogun, Eig, McKay, & Spurgeon, 2000). When decisions are made by the board, it means they lack
confidence in the upper management of the company to make vital decisions. This is problematic for the
company for a few reasons. Because members of theboard have so much money invested in company stock,they want to minimize risk,and thus, are extremely prone to take fewer chances. The members of the board
(except the CEO) do not or have not worked for the company, so they are not close enough to know all the
pertinent information required to make complex decisions.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
12/33
#14 Managing Conflict, Power, and Politics
Conflicts can be a healthy way for an organization to improve decision making, and create new ways for
looking at problems. Conflicts can also be a significant source of trouble for an organization when they cause
production declines or important decisions cannot be made. (Jones, 2007). When the organization sought a
new CEO in 2004, their top choices turned them down because the prospects felt that the board had too
much power (McKay and Terhune, 2004). This type of conflict can drastically affect the organizations ability
to change and adapt quickly, a necessity in the companys extremely uncertain environment. The examplealso shows that it can prevent the organization from acquiring important human resources.
The marketing department is the most powerful subunit in the organization. According to the text (Jones,
2007), The (Coca-Cola Companys) marketing department has considerable power because it is the department
that can attract customers the critical scarce resource (p.406). The heavy emphasis on marketing could
prevent the company from finding ways to become more efficient in production or distribution. The benefits
derived from the power allocated to the marketing function greatly outweigh any negative consequence. By
providing the department with more resources, the company can conduct greater market research. For
example, even though the organization had a diet beverage (Tab) on the market, research indicated that by
simply using the name Diet Coke, preferences for the same tasting beverage increased dramatically.(Plasketes, 2004). Allocating morecapital to the department also allows for each marketing campaign to be
tailoredto specific markets, making advertisements more effective.
Market research also saves money for the company. If consumer data shows the company that one of their
ideas would not do well, the company can decide not to produce that beverage. The strong emphasis on
marketing has allowed Coca-Cola to become one of the most recognized brand names in the world, which
gives the company an advantage over its competition and gives it more bargaining power.
One negative consequence of putting such a great emphasis on marketing research is evidenced in what has
become known as one of the greatest flops in history. Taste tests indicated that consumers would prefer a
new, sweeter version of Coca-Cola, which lead to the creation of New Coke in 1985 (New Coke, 2007).
The strong brand attachment that the company worked so hard to achieve with consumers caused a severe
backlash towards the reformulation of Coca-Cola. This example proves that market research cannot always be
an indicator of what will actually happen.
Works Cited
Bellis, Mary. (n.d). The history of Coca-Cola. Retrieved October 7, 2007 from:
http://inventors.about.com/od/cstartinventions/a/coca_cola.htm
Blumenstyk, Goldie. U. of Michigan to buy Coke again. Chronicle of Higher
Education, 4/21/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 33, p.A38-A39
Bogomolny, Laura. (2004). Thirst for change. Canadian Business, 8/30/2004, Vol.
77 Issue 17, p.13
Business Insurance. (Anonymous). May 30, 2005
Butler, Rachael. Always Coca-Cola. Beverage World, 3/15/2000, Vol. 119 (1688) Carbonated Soft Drinks
Manufacturing Process flow chart retrieved December 2, 2007 from http://www.coca-
colaindia.com/quality/docs/Quality_System_Manufacturing_process.pdf
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
13/33
Coca-Cola. (2007, October 2). In Wikipedia, The free encyclopedia. Retrieved
October 2, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola C2. (2007, October 26). In Wikipedia, The free encyclopedia. Retrieved
November 23, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola_C2
Coca-cola.co.uk
Coca-Cola Q1 2007 Earnings Call Transcript retrieved December 8, 2007 from
http://www.seekingalpha.com/article/32593-coca-cola-q1-2007-earnings-call- transcript
Country managers (2). Business Europe, 10/2/2002, p.3
Criticism of Coca-Cola. (2007, September 24). In Wikipedia, The free encyclopedia. Retrieved on October 2,
2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Coca- Cola
Dawson, Havis & Halpert, Hedy.. Stahl-ways Coca-Cola. Beverage World,
10/15/1999, Vol. 118 (1681), p.50-54
Deogun, N., Eig, J., McKay, B., & Spurgeon, D. Behind the Coke board's refusal to let CEO Daft buy
Quaker Oats. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition),
11/30/200, p.B1
Deogun, Nikhil & Gibson, Richard. Coke beats out Pepsi for contracts with Burger
King, Domino's. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition), 4/15/1999, p.B2
Donovan, Karen. SunTrust: It's the real thing. Trusts & Estates. Mar 2006. Vol.
145, Issue 3, p.49-54
Fisher, Richard. (2007). The last place on earth where no one has tasted Coca - Cola. New Scientist,
6/16/2007, Vol. 194 Issue 2608, p.21
Foust, Dean. 2006. Queen of pop. Business Week, 8/7/2006, Issue 3996, p.44 -53
Fox, Adrienne. Refreshing a beverage companys culture. HR Magazine, November
2007
Friedman, Ted. The world of Coca-Cola. Communication Research, October 1992, Vol. 19 No 5, p.642-662
Ghemawat, Pankaj. Globalization: The strategy of differences. November 10, 2003. Retrieved on November
28, 2007 from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3773.html
How to make opencola. (2007, October 19). In Wikihow. Retrieved on October 23, from
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-OpenCola
MacArthur, Kate. Hiring of Isdell is classic Coca-Cola. Advertising Age,
5/10/2004, Vol. 75 Issue 19, p.3-68
Manufacturing Process flow chart retrieved December 2, 2007 from http://www.coca-
colaindia.com/quality/docs/Quality_System_Manufacturing_process.pdf
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
14/33
McKay, Betsy and Terhune, Chad. Bottled up -- behind Coke's CEO travails: A long struggle over strategy;
although profits are strong, rivals are gaining cachet; all-star board calls shots; search for a red bull fighter. Wall
Street Journal (Eastern Edition), 4/4/2004, p.A1
McKay, Betsy. Why Coke aims to slake global thirst for safe water. Wall Street
Journal (Eastern Edition), 3/15/2007, p.B1-B2
McLellan, Hilary. "Corporate storytelling perspectives. Journal for Quality & Participation, Spring 2006, Vol. 29Issue 1, p.17-20
Morris, Betsy. Coke gets a jolt. Fortune, 5/15/2006, Vol. 153 Issue 9, p.77-78 Online extra: How NYU chose
Colombia over Coke. Business Week Online, 1/17/2006, p.21
Phillips, Sandra N. Team training puts fizz in Coke plants future. Personnel
Journal, January, 2006, v.75, p.87
Plasketes, George Keeping Tab: A diet soft drink shelf life. (2004). Journal of
American Culture, March 2003, v. 27 no.1, p.54-66
Rayasam, Renuka. Thepause that refreshes. U.S. News & World Report, 5/28/2007, Vol. 142 Issue 19,
p.EE8-EE10
Reuters. (n.d.). Coca-Cola Co: Management. Retrieved on November 29, from
http://www.reuters.com/investing
Santioli, Michael. Coke may get bigger,bolder. Barrons, 2/20/2006, Vol. 86, Issue 8, p.17
The science of alliance. (1998). Economist, 04/04/98, Vol. 346 Issue 8062, p.69-
70
The Coca-Cola Company. (2003). Annual Review. Retrieved on December 1, 2007 from http://www.thecoca-
colacompay.com
The Coca-Cola Company. (2006). Annual Report.
The Coca-Cola Company. (2006). Annual Review.
The Coca-Cola Company. (2006). Corporate Responsibility Review. July, 2006.
The Coca-Cola Company. (2007, October 2). In Wikipedia, The free encyclopedia. Retrieved October 2, 2007
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Coca-Cola_Company Thecoca-colacompany.com
Walters, Anne K. (2006). Soft drinks, hard feelings. Chronicle of Higher
Education, 4/14/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 32, p.A30-A32
Ward, Andrew. Faces in the frame amid talk of Coke's rising stars. Financial
Times (London, England). 1/20/2006, Friday London Edition
Wendy's Says No to Pepsi, Yes to Coca-Cola. The New York Times, 8/25/1998, Late
Edition
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
15/33
World of Coca Cola. (2007, November 20). In Wikipedia, The free encyclopedia. Retrieved December 7, 2007
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_of_Coca-Cola Worldofcocacola.com
Appendices
Analysis Module # 1 Organizations and Organizational Effectiveness
1. What is the name of the organization? Give a short history of the company. Describe how it has grown
and developed. Be sure to identify when your organization was founded, and who founded it.
Coca-Cola was invented 1885 by a pharmacist, John Stith Pemberton (Coca-Cola,2007). It was initially an
alcoholic beverage intended to cure morphine addiction, but the alcohol was removed when the temperance
movement gained momentum. In 1886, Pemberton began to sell the product at a local pharmacy. Pembertons
partner and bookkeeper actually came up with the name Coca-Cola, and was also the creator of the
famous Coca-Cola script that is still used today. Coca-Cola was named after a main ingredient: coco leaves,
which cocaine comes from. Coca-Cola was initially marketed as a fix-all tonic, used to cure morphine addiction,
headaches,
impotence, and many other ailments (Coca-Cola). In 1887, Pemberton sold it to Asa
Griggs Candler, who incorporated it as The Coca Cola Company a year later. In the same year Pemberton also
sold it to two other businessmen, while his son also sold his own version. After some legal actions, Candler
once again incorporated the company in 1892, this time using the name The Coca-Cola Company.
Candler was an aggressive marketer, and increased syrup sales over 4000 percent from 1890-1900 (Bellis). At
the turn of the century, Coca-Cola was being sold across the United States and Canada. In the early 1900s, thecocaine was removed from the recipe (Coca-Cola, 2007). The Coca-Cola Company even started production
internationally in countries such as Guam, Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. In 1920 it established its first
bottler in France, Coca-Colas first European plant (Thecoca-colacompany.com). During World War II, The
Coca-Cola Company set up 64 bottling plants in Europe and the Pacific which led to easy post World War II
expansion. When supplies to produce Coca-Cola ran out in Germany, Fanta was created. The 1960s saw the
creation of Sprite, Tab, and Fresca. In 1960, Minute Maid marked Coca-Colas venture into the juice market. In
the 1980s, taste tests suggested that consumers preferred a sweeter version of Coca-Cola. This led to the
launch of New Coke. Consumers were angry because they had a strong emotional attachment to the original
Coca-Cola. The company listened to consumers, and Coca- Cola became Coca-Cola Classic, and New Coke
ultimately failed.
The 1990s saw The Coca-Cola Companys expansion into the bottled water industry (Dasani) and the sports
drink world (Powerade). The famous Coca-Cola bears and the always Coca-Cola ad campaign were launched
in 1993 (Thecoca-colacompany.com). Today, The Coca-Cola Company has over 400 different brands, and
operates in even the most remote places of the globe.
2. What does the organization do? What goods and services does it produce/provide? What kind of value
does it create? What does the companys Annual Report describe as the organizations mission?
Our business is nonalcoholic beveragesprincipally carbonated soft drinks, but also a variety of
noncarbonated beverages. We manufacture beverage concentrates and syrups, which we sell to bottling and
canning operations, fountain wholesalers and some fountain retailers, as well as some finished beverages,
which we sell primarily to distributors. We also produce, market, and distribute certain juice and juice drinks
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
16/33
and certain water products. In addition, we have ownership interests in numerous bottling and canning
operations, although most of these operations are independently owned and managed.
The organization produces a product widely known, Coca-cola or Coke. Besides the namesake, it also has
approximately 400 other brands, including an array of other Coke variations. Another facet of the
organization bottles and distributes the products. The value it creates for its consumers is that it is a good
tasting drink that consumers would like to have. For some, it may give more energy to do to the caffeine, for
others, it may just be the taste that they enjoy.
We believe that our success depends on our ability to connect with consumers by providing them with a wide
variety of choices to meet their desires, needs and lifestyle choices. Our success further depends on the
ability of our people to execute effectively, every day.
Our goal is to use our Company's assetsour brands, financial strength, unrivaled distribution system, and
the strong commitment of management and employeesto become more competitive and to accelerate
growth in a manner that creates value for our shareowners (Annual Report, 2006, p.33).
3. Describe the organizations inputs, processes, and outputs.
The inputs for The Coca-Cola Companys beverages include raw materials, the employees, and of course the
secret recipe. The principal raw materials used by Coca-Cola are water, nutritive and non-nutritive
sweeteners. High fructose corn syrup is the primary nutritive sweetener used in the United States. Sucrose is
used outside of the United States. Non-nutritive sweeteners used by Coca-Cola are aspartame, acesulfame
potassium, saccharin, cyclamate, and sucralose. Purified water is also one of the key ingredients in every
beverage produced. In regards tothe juice products, orange juice concentrate is the primary raw material
(AnnualReport, 2006)
The processes for producing the organizations products are mixing the ingredients together in a specific order
after measuring them. First, they must make the flavoring, and then the concentrate. Many of the ingredientsare very toxic (caffeine) or skin irritants so while producing Coca-Cola they must be very cautious as to not come
into direct contact with some of the ingredients (How to make opencola, 2007). The company must also
treat their water before using it (worldofcocacola.com). Other processes exist with-in the organization that do
not relate to production. Such processes are financing, accounting, managing, marketing, supply chain
management, distribution, maintenance, etc;
Outputs for The Coca-Cola Company are the concentrate and syrup for each of the many non-alcoholic
beverages.
4. Do an initial analysis of the organizations major problems or issues. What challenges confront the
organization today? How does its organizational design relate to these problems?
The Coca-Cola Company faces a wide variety of problems. In the United States, consumers are becoming more
health conscious, which has hurt the sales of Coca- Cola. Due to The Coca-Cola Companys global presence,
the company must deal with many political challenges. They have been criticized for causing a great deal of
pollution, damaging towns water supplies, and have been highly criticized for its alleged anti-union actions.
Coca-Cola also faces increased competition from well- established global companies, and local organizations
as well (Annual Report,2006).
The Coca-Cola Company also faces challenges with its supply of rawmaterials. The prices for many of its raw
materials fluctuate based on market conditions. When these prices rise, so do production costs. Some of the
raw materials are available only from a few limited suppliers (Annual Report, 2006). Coca-Cola has more of a
decentralized structure, separated by region. Since the majority of the companys problems are based
geographically, the decentralized structure is ideal. Each region has different regulations, different consumer
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
17/33
needs, and different problems to deal with. With a decentralized structure, problems can be solved quickly
and effectively. Some functions remain centrally located, such as marketing and innovation. This allows the
company to formulate one global message, but also allow that message to be tailored at the local level.
5. Read the organizations annual report or other documentation and determine which kinds of goals,
standards, or targets the organization is using to evaluate its organizational performance. How well is the
organization doing when judged by the criteria of control, innovation, and efficiency?
The Coca-Cola Company measures success by volume growth. This measurement is used because the
company believes it measures product trends at the consumer level. This is not always equal during any period
because of some seasonal products, supply changes, and price increases (Annual Report, 2006). The
organization has also undertaken many initiatives to boost its image as a responsible global citizen. It
currently has over 70 clean-water projects in many countries across the world (McKay, 2007). Attached in the
appendices is a detailed performance chart from the 2006 Corporate Responsibility Review.
The Coca-Cola Company is doing fairly well when judged in terms of control. Considering the dynamic nature
of their environment, they have been able to keep sales and net income increasing. Their cost to produce these
goods actually decreased last year, showing that they were able to control their suppliers more than the prior
year (Annual Report, 2006). The organization has done an alright job controlling the political aspects of their
external environment. One problem that will be discussed later is increased scrutiny of their operations in
India and Colombia. Although organizations have boycotted the company and lawsuits have been filed, the
average consumer is completely oblivious to the allegations against the company, and growth has continued.
The Coca-Cola Companys primary focus is marketing (Jones, 2007). Due to this focus, the company is
constantly trying to find out what consumers want, and then trying to produce it. The Coca-Cola Company is
always looking to strategically launch new products in each of the countries it operates in. From 2005 to 2006,
the organization launched over 1,000 products (Foust, 2006). It would be a mistake to call the organization
highly innovative though. While they are always launching new products, they are usually not the first to create
a new type of beverage.
The company was late to the game in sports drinks, energy drinks, and coffee,regarding them as low-volume
distractions (Morris, 2006, para. 6). CEO NevilleIsdell said (as cited in Morris, 2006) "I don't believe we've
done more in the past than dabble outside carbonated soft drinks. We have not been able to think creatively
enough (para. 9).
The Coca-Cola Company is very efficient in their efforts to produce their products. They use their assets to stay
on top of the market to grow and create value for shareholders. They also are very good at connecting withtheir customers (Annual Report, 2006).
Analysis Module #2 Stakeholders, Managers, and Ethics
1. Identify the organizations major stakeholder groups. What kinds of conflicts between its stakeholder
groups would you expect to occur the most? The organizations major stakeholders in the company are:
shareowners, associates,bottling partners, suppliers, government, NGOs, customers and consumers and their
local markets (Corporate Responsibility Review, 2006). The most expected major conflicts are between the
shareowners of the organization and the local markets governing bodies and consumers. The main goal of a
shareowner is obviously profit. Lawmakers and consumers in every market have become increasingly
demanding of corporations to become more environmentally friendly, and adhere to certain labor standards.
The reduction of pollution and improving working condition reduce the ability of the shareholders to profit.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
18/33
The Coca-Cola Company has received a great deal of criticism for pollution and water consumption, which will
be discussed later.
Conflicts with suppliers also result from the fact that each partys goal is to maximize profit. The supplier
wants the most money for their products, while The Coca-Cola Company wants to pay the least amount
possible for high quality inputs. Different divisions may also become in conflict with each other over resources.
Two regional plants may want to invest in new technology, but the organization may not have the money
spend on both divisions.
2. Draw a picture of the organizations hierarchy of authority. Try to identify the members of the top
management team. Is the CEO also the chair of the board of directors?A hierarchy of the top management team
is located the appendices. The CEO is also the chairmen of the board (Reuters.com).
3. Does the organization have divisional managers? Which functional managers seem to be most important
to the organization in achieving a competitive advantage? What is the functional background of each member
of the top management team?
The organization has divisional managers that are the heads of each regional division. Along with the divisionalmanagers, important functional managers include the head of Human Resources, Innovation and Development,
Marketing, and Public Affairs (Thecoca-colacompany.com).
A lot of the functional managers seem to have worked for or ran bottling companies in various parts of the
world. The knowledge gained from doing this will give the organization a better understanding of its bottling
partners, and give the company a better chance to establish and maintain strong relationships with its
bottlers. COO Muhtar Kent has had roles in both marketing and operations. This gives him a broad
understanding of two important functions of the organization.
The following information was all found at Thecoca-colacompany.com.CEO Neville Isdell started at a bottling
company in Zambia in 1966. He has been a general manager of a bottling plant, regional manager for
Australia, president ofa European Division, and president of what it now the Northeast Europe/Middle
EastGroup.
COO Muhtar Kent has had various roles in marketing and operations. Besides running a few different regional
divisions within The Coca-Cola Company, he also worked for a few bottling companies. Kent will actually
become the CEO of The Coca-Cola Company on July 1, 2008.
Executive Vice President and CFO Gary Fayard were the vice president and controller of the company, and
serves on the board of the companys two largest bottling partners. Besides being a partner, he was a
director of audit services and of manufacturing services at Ernst & Young.
Executive Vice President and President of Bottling Investments and Supply Chain Irial Finan has done a wide
variety of international work. He has worked for three different bottling partners, having positions such as
CEO, managing director, and finance director.
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing and Commercial Officer Joseph Tripodi has been the chief marketing
officer at the following companies: Allstate Insurance Co., The Bank of New York, and Seagrams Spirts &
Wine Group. He also wasan executive vice president for MasterCard International and created thepriceless
campaign.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
19/33
Analysis Module #4 Organizational Design
1. How has your organization responded to its design challenges?
a. Is it centralized or decentralized? How do you know?
The Coca-Cola Company is moving towards a more decentralized structure. The company is divided by
region. Groups are as follows: Africa, Eurasia, European Union, Latin America, North America, and Pacific.
(Thecoca-colacompany.com) Changes in structure freed up the Chief Marketing Office from the day to dayoperations so she could focus on the direction of the company (Rayasam, 2007). In 2006, the organization
moved the Africa operating group from the United Kingdom to South Africa (Annual Review, 2006). Since its
inception, the organization believed that the love for Coca-Cola was universal. This led to a strong centralized
organization. In the 1990s, Coca-Colas growth slowed significantly. The CEO at the time, Douglas Daft pushed
power down the organization, and let the countries have more autonomy. For example, the decision to
sponsor the 2002 world cup was made at the corporate level. The implementation however was up to the
local markets. Each type of advertisement was tailored to each specific market (Country managers (2),
2002).
b. Is it highly differentiated? List the major roles, functions, or departments in your organization. Does yourorganization have many divisions? If your organization engages in many businesses, list the major divisions in
the company. The operating groups are divided into the following regions: North America, Latin America,
European Union, Africa, North Asia, Eurasia & Middle East, and East, South Asia & Pacific Rim. Non-
geographic operating groups include Bottling Investments and Corporate (Annual Report, 2006). The
corporate segments in 2003 had the following nine functions: Corporate External Affairs; Customer
Management; Finance; Human Resources; Innovation/Research and Development; Legal; Marketing; Quality;
and Worldwide Public Affairs and Communications (Annual Review, 2003). The organization is extremely
differentiated, both vertically and horizontally.
The horizontal differentiation is evident because they have different departments for finance, human
resources, marketing, etc. The vertical differentiation can be seen with how many levels the organization
has. The company is also spatially differentiated, with divisions based upon geographic location.
c. Can you identify any integrating mechanisms used by your organization? What is the match between
the complexity of the differentiation and the complexity of the integrating mechanisms that are used? The
organization has used teams as an integrating mechanism in the past. Teams of specialists analyzed consumer
research to create new beverages (Rayasam, 2007). In 2004, Neville Isdell took over as CEO and chairmen of
The Coca-Cola Company. Not being pleased with the 2% growth rate for the company in 2004, Isdell realized
drastic measure needed to be taken. HR first surveyed 400 of the companys managers to help assess the
companys troubles. Then 70 of those managers were interviewed. Isdell had 150 of the companys top
managers from around the globe meet 3 times in a 4 month span. These managers formed task forces, and
each one analyzed and came up with solutions to the problems that were brought forth in the surveys. Face-
to-face meetings began being held regularly, and the intranet underwent drastic changes to provide real-time
news (Fox, 2007).
d. Is behavior in the organization very standardized, or does mutual adjustment play an important role in
coordinating people and activities? Because The Coca-Cola Company must produce the same high quality final
product, behavior must be standardized. The organization has a very strict Code of Conduct, which outlines
how employees at all levels of the organization should act (Thecoca-colacompany.com). However, mutual
adjustment does play a role in the company. In 2006, in the United Kingdom, the organization emphasized
trying to encourage employees to improve the working environment (Coca-cola.co.uk).
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
20/33
With the push towards a more decentralized and organic structure, the organization has made strides to
increase the role that mutual adjustment plays. In 2004, the organization created the Manifesto for Growth.
This was based on the developments made by the surveys and the management meetings. One worker
said The manifesto is a framework that gives a direction and helps me in my role to see the opportunities
where I can make a difference and put my ideas into action (Fox,2007, para.17).
e. What can you tell about the level of formalization by looking at the number and kinds of rules the
organization uses? The organization is extremely formal. There is a strict code of conduct which Coca-Cola
rigidly enforces. The code of conduct is expansive, and if violated, employees will be disciplined. Every
employee hired is trained on the code (Corporate Responsibility Review, 2006).
The company also has voluntary agreements with the largest bottling partners. This agreement measures their
corporate responsibility in the workplace, marketplace, environment, and then community (Corporate
Responsibility Review, 2006)
f. How important is socialization in your organization? Socialization is very important in the organization. The
company uses a variety of training methods to create a culture that is open to diversity. The organization alsouses its rich history to instill a sense of pride and purpose into its employees.
g. In general, does your organization conform more to the organic or to the mechanistic model of organizational
structure? Explain why you think it is organic or mechanistic.
Mechanistic Organic
Focus Efficiency, stability Flexibility, responsiveness
Specialization High Low
Integrating Mechanisms Simple Complex
Centralization High Low
Standardization High Low
Communication Top-down Network (top-down, bottom-up, lateral)
Due to changes that have been made recently to the organizations structure and philosophy, it is hard to say
with certainty that the company has a definite mechanistic or organic structure. Even though decision making
has increased in the lower levels of the organization, it still seems to be more centralized. According to thecompanys website, the organization is making efforts to increase simplification and standardization. These are
characteristics of a mechanistic structure (Arendt, Ch.4). With the strong approach to marketing and consumer
research, the focal point of the organization is on responsiveness andflexibility. As stated earlier, complex
integrating mechanisms are being used, andwith the use of surveys, information has been flowing from the
bottom-up as well as the typical bottom-down (Fox, 2007). When employees are trained, they learn multiple
skills so they are able to provide back up and are able to rotate, decreasing specialization (Phillips, 1996).
These are characteristics of an organic structure (Arendt, Ch.4). Based on the chart presented, of the two
structures, the organization is slightly more organic.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
21/33
Analysis Module #5 Designing Organizational Structure: Authority & Control
1. How many people does your organization employ? The Coca-Cola Company employs 71,000 people
2. How many levels are there in the organizations hierarchy?
We were unable to obtain exactly how many levels there are in the organization, however according to an
organization chart found on the companys website (located in the appendices) there are at least five levels.
We were not able to find information on the structure of the regional operating groups.
3. Is the organization tall or flat? Does the organization experience any of the problems associated with tall
hierarchies? If yes, which ones?
The organization is tall. There are at least 5 levels, but it is safe to assume there are at least a few more on
the regional level. One of the larger problems the company has been trying to deal with is motivation
problems, more specifically trying to get the workers engaged. Another problem indicated by the survey
performed in 2004 was that The business and its people lacked a clear direction and a common purpose (Fox,
2007). This problem is the result of poor communication from upper management.
4. What is the span of control of the CEO? Is this span appropriate, or is it too wide or too narrow? The span
of the CEO according to the hierarchy is two (The CFO/Executive Vice President Gary Fayard, and Executive Vice
President/President of Bottling/Supplies Irial Finan). This may seem like a slim span of control, however but
the CEO is able to obtain information from other divisions with the use of the Senior Leadership Team. This
team consists of the presidents of each regional operating group, and also other high executives like the Chief
Marketing Officer and Commercial Officer, and the Chief Innovation and Technology Officer (Thecoca-
colacompany.com)
5. How do centralization, standardization, and horizontal differentiation affect the shape of the organization?
Because of the push towards decentralization, The Coca-Cola Companys structure has changed over therecent years. In 2006, the company opened a new office in Cairo, so that decisions could be made on a
more local level (Annual Review, 2006). The organization has also decided to centralize some functions, such
as marketing. Due to problems in Asia, the organization moved the central marketing functions back to the
company headquarters in 2003 (Ghemawat, 2003).
Based on employee surveys, the organization is making more efforts to increase operational effectiveness by
increasing standardization (Thecoca-colacompany.com). There was not much information on how
standardization has shaped the structure of the company.
Horizontal differentiation has a major affect on the shape of the organization. They are divided into separatesubunits for each of their operating groups (i.e. Eurasia, Pacific, North America, etc.). Each manager for an
operating group is responsible for everyone else in their division, and they report to the CFO of corporate
headquarters. This helps them keep a more organic perspective because each operational group is basically
run by itself.
6. Do you think your organization does a good or a poor job in managing its hierarchy of authority? Why or
why not? Overall, The Coca-Cola Company does a good job of managing its hierarchy of authority.
Considering they have a tall structure, they are still able to keep a slightly more organic style of management,
allowing them to be more adaptable to changing conditions. The CEO and CFO both have six people that
report to them. With the exception of the North America, which has ten divisions, each operating group hassix or less divisions. By pushing the day to day decisions down the hierarchy, upper management can focus
on long-term strategy and planning. In order to help faclitate the flow of information, the organization conducts
surveys of its employees, and also has frequent meetings, and uses a more sophisticated intranet (Fox, 2007)
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
22/33
Analysis Module #6 Designing Organizational Structure: Specialization & Coordination
1. What kind of structure does your organization have, e.g., functional, divisional, matrix? Draw a diagram
showing its structure, and identify the major subunits or divisions in the organization. The Coca-Cola Company
has a multidivisional structure based on geography. A general organizational chart showing these geographic
divisions can be found in the appendices (Thecoca-colacompany.com).
2. Why does your organization use this kind of structure? What are the advantages and disadvantages
associated with this structure for your organization? Is there a more appropriate structure for your organization
to use? This structure is used because it allows each division to be independent and have its own set of
support functions. This structure works well because it gives the company more flexibility to help deal with its
uncertain environment and it allows each product to be tailored to each individual market in some way. The
multidivisional structure allows each division to be accountable for its results and responsible for creating profits
(Country Managers (2), 2002). Disadvantages associated with a multidivisional structure are coordination
problems between divisions, high bureaucratic costs, and communication problems (Jones, 2007). As stated in
Fox (2007), the companys goals were unclear, which is a sign of poor communication from upper
management.
A multidivisional matrix structure may be more fitting for the organization. In these structures, corporate-
level specialists would evaluate an individual division and then create a functional plan (Jones, 2007). This
structure would increase coordination between levels, and decisions would be made by both divisional and
corporate managers. Some weaknesses of a matrix structure include its complexity and it may be too time-
consuming (Arendt, Ch.6). The Coca-Cola Company has plants all around the world, so it would be
complicated to set up the required meetings, and travel is also expensive.
Analysis Module #3 Managing in a Changing Global Environment
1. List the organizations products/services and customers and the forces in the specific (task) and general
environments that affect it. Which are the most important environmental forces that the organization has to
deal with? The Coca-Cola Company has over 400 brands and operates in 200 countries. The main products
that offered are energy drinks, juices/juice drinks, soft drinks, sports drinks, tea and coffee, water, and
other. The organization operates specifically in the non-alcoholic beverage domain (Thecoca-
colacompany.com)
Some of the energy drinks the company offers in the United States are Full Throttle, TaB Energy, and KMX.
There are over 20 juice drink brands including Five Alive, Fuze, Hi-C, and of course Minute Maid. Besides the
various types of Coca Cola soft drinks, they also produce Barqs root beer, Citra, Fanta, Mellow Yellow, Mr.Pibb, Fresca, Sprite, and Tab. Powerade is there lone brand of sports drink. Nestea is their most popular tea
beverage, and they also have Enviga and Gold Peak. Dasani and Dannon make up their two brands of water
(Thecoca-colacompany.com).
The customers of The Coca Cola Company are actually not the people that consume the beverages. The
customers for the organization are bottlers, fountain wholesalers and retailers, and distributers (Annual Report,
2006). The bottlers in turn sell the finished product to supermarkets, retail chains, restaurants, etc. The
forces in the general environment are as follows: demographic and cultural, international, political,
technological, economic, and environmental. The forces in the task environment that affect the company are
as follows: customers, distributors, unions, competitors, suppliers, and governments.
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
23/33
The organization is most greatly affected by the general environment. Political and environmental forces and
demographic, cultural and social forces all have the strongest impact on the company. The broad portfolio
of the organization actually limits the effects of economic forces on the company. In 2006, for North America,
there was no growth in case volume, and in the Philippines, consumption actually declined. This was offset
by double digit volume growth in countries such as Russia, Argentina, and China. (Annual Report, 2006). An
extremely important force is the political consequences of operating on such a large scale, in so many
countries. The organization must be aware of the different laws of each area of the world they operate in.
Since the company strives to be an ethical company, they must also be aware that although some things may
be legal in one country, they may be frowned upon in other parts of the world (Fisher, 2007). The Coca-Cola
Company actually operates in more countries than there are in the United Nations. It has also made it into
countries in which U.S companies are not allowed to do business in, like Cuba and Iran. The organization is
able to do this because it does not actually operate there. Third parties do the selling.
One extremely interesting piece of information that deals with both political factors and social/cultural factors is
the recent criticism of Coca Cola in a few different aspects of the companys operations. Recently the company
has been strongly criticized for its pollution and contamination of groundwater and soil in India (Walters,
2006).
The main focus of The Coca-Cola Company is on their consumers. Since Coca Cola operates in so many
diverse areas in the world, they must be aware of what each regions consumers desire. Coca Cola has a very
local oriented focus. Nearly all of Coca Colas beverages are produced by local people and local resources
(Thecoca-colacompany.com). Because the production and distribution are so intertwined in each market, the
organization is more able to meet and adapt to what the consumer wants.
2. Analyze the effect of the forces on the dynamism, munificence, and complexity of the environment.
How would you characterize the level of uncertainty in your organizations environment?
The environment that the organization operates in is extremely dynamic. Once again this can be attributed
to the global nature of the company. As stated in Jones (p.63, 2007), global expansion makes the environment
more difficult to predict and control. One example of an unpredictable event occurred in 2004. A region in
India faced a severe water shortage, and thus ordered both The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo. to shut down
their operations. PepsiCo. decided to build a well with the help of the locals, and was able to begin operations
again within a month. Coca Colas plant was still shut down after 5 months, and it cost the organization
millions of dollars (Bogomolny, 2004).
The previous example also ties in with the environments munificence. In certain areas, PepsiCo., The Coca-
Cola Company, and other beverage makers (including local companies) must compete for resources. The
example of the water shortage in India shows that the certain regions may not be able to support multiple
beverage makers. The Coca-Cola Company must compete with other organizations for human resources as
well. In 2004, the organization was having a difficult time finding a new CEO. Their top choices would not take
the position because they felt the board had too much control (McKay & Terhune, 2004). The organization
not only faces global competition from companies like PepsiCo and Cadbury Schweppes, they face competition
from local beverage producers as well. They all compete for the most scares of all resources: customers. The
company has pretty high credit ratings (Annual Report, 2006), which would allow the company to finance
projects and expansions through the use of debt if needed.
There is a great deal of complexity in the companys environment. According to Jones (p.62, 2007),
complexity can increase greatly when specific and general forces become interconnected. Two factors that
have become interconnected are the social and political factors. Coca Cola has been increasingly criticized for
how it handles business in certain countries. One such country is Colombia in South America. Bottling plants in
Colombia have been accused of participating in numerous terrible acts against its employees to prevent and
-
8/4/2019 Coca Cola - Anaysis
24/33
scare people from being unionized. The pressure and attention generated by public outcries have led to two
different judicial inquiries in Colombia, and also a lawsuit was also filed in the U.S Courts system. The
increased pressure has even led some universities like NYU and the University of Michigan to ban the sale
of Coca-Cola on their campu