co-teaching / di kim dreher : regular education math teacher lori staszewski : special education...

53
Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Upload: kade-ellard

Post on 31-Mar-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Co-Teaching / DI

Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher

Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Page 2: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Essential Questions

• What might the attributes & skills of successful planning for Co-Teaching look like in practice?

• How can we differentiate our assessments without sacrificing validity & reliability?

Page 3: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Why Co-Teach ?

• The basic premise behind the co-teach model is that combining the best of general education with the best of exceptional education will lead to enhanced strategies, expert content, and individualized opportunities for all students. Madeline Will, Secretary of Education 1986

• Gen. Ed. Classrooms provide more instruction, utilized more whole class instruction, provided a comparable amount of one-to-one instruction, addressed academic content more, and utilized non disabled peers more.

Hines 2006

Page 4: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Benefits for General Ed. Students

• Offers the advantage of having an extra teacher in the classroom to help with the development of their own skills.

• Greater acceptance of students with disabilities.• Facilitates understanding that students with

disabilities are not always easily identified• Promotes better understanding of the

similarities among students with and without disabilities.

Hines 2006

Page 7: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Shadow Teaching

• General Education Teacher is primarily responsible for teaching specific subject matter.

• Special education teacher works directly with one or two students on academics or on conduct/self control.

Choate 2004

Page 8: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

One Teach / One Assist

• General Education teacher is responsible for teaching subject matter.

• The special education teacher circulates to offer individual assistance.

• Variations include: one teach/one assist; one teach/one demonstrate; one teach/one assess; one teach/one demonstrate; one teach/one review; one teach/one observe.

Choate 2004

Page 9: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Station Teaching

• General education and the special education teacher teach different portions of the subject matter to subgroups of students who then rotate from one learning station to another.

• Students can also have the opportunity to engage in an independent learning activity at another learning station.

Choate 2004

Page 10: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Complementary Teaching

• General education teacher is responsible for teaching the subject matter

• The special education teacher helps with associated academics (note taking, test taking, or proofreading skills.)

• Also the S.E. teacher helps with academic skills (sharing, self-control, conflict resolution.)

Choate 2004

Page 14: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Team Teaching

• Teachers plan together• Take turns with formal instruction• Both asses students• Both responsible for all parts of academic

instruction• Incorporate Dialogue Teaching

Friend 2004

Page 16: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

• My tolerance level ends when a student _________.

• To work effectively, I need ___________ in my classroom.

• I could not tolerate a co-teacher who ________.• In my classroom, the following are non-

negotiables:– – –

Questions to Ask your Co-Teacher

Page 17: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

The Teacher Dance

• Both teachers should not be in the same area of the classroom at the same time.

• If one teacher is moving towards the back of the classroom then the other teacher should be moving towards the front.– Don’t be afraid to teach from the back of the

classroom. Have the other teacher write the notes on the board.

• The student’s really like this technique because they get to see the lesson from another view.

• It also develops their listening skills and uses their senses. Hines 2006

Page 18: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Discipline

• Communication Is Key!!• Make sure you decide before hand how you will handle

certain situations and what the discipline will be for the certain situation.

• If one of the teacher’s had a run-in with a student earlier in the day make sure to tell the other teacher so that they can handle the discipline with that student if a problem arises.

• With a second teacher you have two sets of ears and eyes so you can usually eliminate problems before they even start.

• You can also pull a student outside of the classroom to talk to solve problems since there is still a teacher in the classroom.

Page 19: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Planning

• There will never be enough time to plan

Page 20: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Schedule Time

• It needs to work for both

• A must for the– Beginning of the year– Beginning of a unit– Beginning of a week– Beginning of a lesson

pg 33-39 Hines 2006

Page 21: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Plan to Incorporate …

• IEP Goals

• Modifications

• Accommodations

• Adaptations

Page 22: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Co-planning

• Traveling TeacherMaterials

Plan with ___Meeting times

Substitute PlansGrading Students

• Stationary TeacherWork Area

Collaborative PlanningRecording grades

Daily gradingSubstitute Plans

Content Development

Hines 2006

Page 23: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Roles

• Planning allows establishing roles for teachers. Who will:

Deliver Do-Now (warm up)

Grade/Record Daily agenda

Absentee procedure Discipline

Chores Parent Contact

Hines 2006

Page 24: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Suggested Class Plan

Team Teaching• 5 minsAnticipatory Set Special Ed Teacher• 15 mins New Content General Teacher• 10 mins Guided Practice Special Ed Teacher• 20 mins Independent Practice Both• 5 mins Closure Either

Hines 2006

Page 25: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Suggested Class Plan

Alternative Teaching

Teacher Time Activity_________ _____ __________

Teacher Time Activity_________ _____ __________

Students: ________________________

Hines 2006

Page 26: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Suggestions for Planning

• Chunk planning is more beneficial than small bits of planning everyday

• Gain common prep/lunch periods• Grant money• IDEA money

Hines 2006

Page 27: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Students Opinions

• Senior: “I like having an in-class support teacher in the room. I only have an extra teacher in math because she helps me understand more. Sometimes I don’t understand what my math teacher is saying or teaching so by having a second teacher he/she will help you understand at your own pace.”

• Freshman: “Having a second teacher in class is very exciting and very helpful. The second teacher is helpful because it gives other students a chance for help and call allow the first teacher to move about more freely in class. The second teacher is also better because he/she would have more time to explain the problems. Also, the teacher being on his/her own would half-way tell the explanation to save more time to put the work on the board.”

Page 28: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

In Closing for Co-Teaching

• Special Education v. Regular Education– IDEA– NCLB– Least Restrictive Environment– It’s not going anywhere so we as teachers

need to accommodate for every type of student in our classroom.

Page 29: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Differentiated Instruction…

Page 30: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Three Kinds of Groups

WhoDetermined by teacher perceptions

or evidence of learning needs.

Determined largely by scores on standardized tests of intelligence or

aptitude

Determined by the teacher or student choice

Based on specific learning needs, strengths, or preferences

Based on general performance or achievement

Usually random as to student ability or learning preferences

Fluid group membership Rigid group membership Fluid group membership

Groups work on different activities based on needs, strengths,

or preferences.

Groups all tend to work on the same or similar activities.

Each group works on the same task or on one facet of the same

task.

Students are grouped and regrouped as appropriate for

particular activities.

Students may or may not be regrouped within the classroom based on

instructional needs.

Students may be purposely mixed as to learning needs and academic strengths to provide peer instruction

or leadership within groups.

Occurs as needed Occurs daily Occurs when a task seems appropriate

Grouping based on individual students’ skill proficiency, content mastery, learning preferences or

interests.

Grouping based on perceptions about innate ability.

Grouping for the purpose of developing collaborative skills.

How

What

Do

How

When

How

Flexible Groups Ability/Aptitude Groups Cooperative groups

Page 31: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

What are some benefits of using the multiple intelligences / interests approach at Lindenwold High School?

• Studies show that many students who perform poorly on traditional tests are turned on to learning when classroom experiences incorporate artistic, athletic, and musical activities.

• You will provide opportunities for authentic learning based on your students' needs, interests and talents. The multiple intelligence classroom acts like the "real" world.” Students become more active, involved learners.

• Parent and community involvement in your school may increase. This happens as students demonstrate work before panels and audiences. Activities involving apprenticeship learning bring members of the community into the learning process.

• Students will be able to demonstrate and share their strengths. Building strengths gives a student the motivation to be a "specialist." This can in turn lead to increased self-esteem.

• When you "teach for understanding," your students accumulate positive educational experiences and the capability for creating solutions to problems in life

Page 32: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Learning Styles1. Verbal-Linguistic: abilities to use vocabulary, do verbal analysis,

understand metaphors, and comprehend and produce complex verbal material

2. Logical-Mathematical: involves numbers and computing skills, recognizing patterns and relationships, timelines, ability to solve different kinds of problems through logic

3. Visual-Spatial: involves visual perception of the environment, ability to create and manipulate mental images, and the orientation of the body in space

4. Bodily-Kinesthetic: physical coordination and dexterity, using fine and gross motor skills, and expressing oneself or learning through physical activities

5. Musical-Rhythmic: understanding and expressing onself through music and rhythmic movements or dance, or composing, playing, or conducting music

6. Naturalistic: understanding the natural world of plants and animals 7. Interpersonal: understanding how to communicate with and understand

other people and how to work collaboratively 8. Intrapersonal: understanding one's inner world of emotions and

thoughts, and growing in the ability to control them and work them consciously

9. Naturalistic': understanding the outside world, nature, and one's natural surroundings.

Page 33: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Learning Style / Interest Tests

• On the computer:– http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/

resources_ftp/client_ftp/ks3/ict/multiple_int/questions/choose_lang.cfm

– http://literacyworks.org/mi/assessment/findyourstrengths.html

• Printable tests

Page 34: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Principals of Effective Grading

Concerning Assessments, grading methods needs to be established in the planning as well as understood by both teacher & student.

Page 35: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Principal 1

Grades & Reports Should be based on Clearly Specified Learning Goals &

Performance Standards.

Page 36: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

• “In order for grades to have any real meaning we must have more than simply a letter/number relationship; meaning performance standards require that there be descriptions of the qualities in student work for each symbol in the grading scale.”

-Ken O’Connor

Page 37: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Principal 2

Evidence Used for grading Should be Valid

Page 38: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

“Don’t think of your self as an activity planner…”

-I forget who said this.

Page 39: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Principal 3

Grading Should be Based on Established Criteria, Not on Arbitrary Norms

Page 40: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

• “… Norm based grading promotes unhealthy competition in which some students will necessarily become “winners” and others “losers” as they compete…”

-Tomlinson & McTighe (2006)

Page 41: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Principle 4

Not Everything Should be Included in Grades

Page 42: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

“Grades should be derived largely from the results of summative assessments carefully designed to allow studnets to demonstrate accumulated proficiency related to idenified content goals.”

-Tomlinson & McTighe (2006)

Page 43: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Principle 5

Avoid Grading Based on (Mean) Averages

Page 44: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

“… grades should be “determined” from various sources of evidence, rather than “calculated” in a purely quantitative manner. This involves judgment.”

- Ken O’Connor

Page 45: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Principle 6

Focus on Achievement, and Report Other Factors Seperately

Page 46: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

“A grade should give as clear a measure as possible of the best a student can do.”

-Tomlinson & McTighe (2006)

Page 47: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

The Learning Process

ASSESSMENT

Learning Activities

Page 48: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Tiered Assignments

• Challenge Level– Use Bloom’s Taxonomy as a guide to develop tasks ay various

levels of challenge. • Complexity

– Address the needs of students who are at introductory levels of learning as well as those who are ready for more abstract, analytical, in-depth, or advanced work.

• Resources– Choose materials at various reading levels and complexity of

content. • Outcome

– Students will use the same materials but will have differentiated assignments. (You need a clear understanding of student readiness)

Page 49: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Tiered Assignments (cont.)

• Process– Students will work on similar outcomes but

use different processes to get there.

• Product– Form groups on based on learning

preference, using Garner’s multiple intelligences.

Page 50: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

When and How to Tier an Assignment

• Are there points when some students need more time to work on content or a skill and other students are ready for more advanced work. (The exit points of your curriculum)– Tier by challenge or complexity

• Is there an activity in which varied resources could be matched with student needs and readiness. – Tier by resources

Page 51: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

• Is there an activity in which the same materials could be used to work on both basic and more advanced outcomes?– Tier by outcome

• Is there an activity in which students could benefit from working on the same outcome but doing different kinds of work?– Tier by process

• Is there an activity that could result in more than one way for students to show what they’ve learned?– Tier by product

Page 52: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

Closing

• Exit Card: Journal Writing – Answer Essential Questions (Use Blue Book Starters for help)

Page 53: Co-Teaching / DI Kim Dreher : Regular Education Math Teacher Lori Staszewski : Special Education Teacher

We thank you for your time and your attention!