Co-ordination meetingCo-ordination meeting

Anna Soci Anna Soci An agenda for the future

Crete, October 13/14, 2006Crete, October 13/14, 2006

• 1. Deliverables• 2. Future meetings • 3. Financial aspects • 4. Other issues

AGENDAAGENDA

DELIVERABLES for WP4DELIVERABLES for WP4

REMIND: 2 Deliverables

• One paper assembling the individual data collection for the CGE model

(P2 or P4)• One paper assembling the individual

data collection for the NEG model(s)(P1)

• Both should present the procedures followed in each study area in order to collect the data.

REMIND:REMIND:

• We are already 15 days late with the Final Deliverables for WP4.

• Proposal: • Deadline for the “individual

papers”(one paper for all data collected):

• October 31Deadline for the two Final Deliverables:

November 15th

Deliverables for WP5Deliverables for WP5Leader: P2Leader: P2

Partipants (offcially: all)Partipants (offcially: all)

1. From October 1st 2006 till August 30th 2007 (11 month)

WP5: “Model calibration, analysis and results” will have place

→ 4 Deliverables- 1 research paper on application and

results of individual CGE analysis- 1 comparative research paper- 1 research paper of application and results

of NEG/sectoral shifts analysis- 1 comparative research paper

Timing of the deliverablesTiming of the deliverables(from Annex 1: DoW)(from Annex 1: DoW)

• Month 25 (end of July 2007)• Milestone No. 3 for WP5

• Deliverable: one relevant research paper on the application and results of CGE analysis

• Deliverable: one relevant research paper on the application and results of NEG

Timing of the deliverablesTiming of the deliverables(from Annex 1: DoW)(from Annex 1: DoW)

• Month 26 (end of August 2007)• Milestone No. 4 for WP5

• Deliverable: one relevant comparative research paper on the application and results of CGE analysis

• Deliverable: one relevant comparative research paper on the application and results of NEG

WHO IS DOING WHAT (and when)?WHO IS DOING WHAT (and when)?• If Aberdeen (and Patras) are carrying out the

quantitative aspects of the CGE models, and Bologna those of the NEG models, they should also write their respective output.

• → 2 papers each team • within end of August (which is the new planned date

for the Conference in Riga) This deadline could also enlarged a bit (for the FINAL versions of the papers to October 2007, when the Conference wold take place.

• This option was preferred (in Joensuu) to the option “1 paper each team, and the two comparative

analysis papers written by another partner”

In the meantime (2007)..In the meantime (2007).. TERA Objective 2

• “Assessing the extent to which the policies take into account the territorial factors. …… We shall compare the weight of these factors, as measured by our empirical results, with the effective relevance they have (if any) in the actual policies”

• P5 (Riga), who is not involved in WP5 and who was not involved in both WP2 and WP3 should work in advance on WP6, which would start officially in September 2007.

WP6 WP6 Relevance of structural development Relevance of structural development

policiespoliciesLeader: RigaLeader: Riga

Participants: allParticipants: all• Identification and analysis of existing structural development policies

• Evaluation of their importance on the formation and the development of enterprises in the study-areas…

• (in the first part of 2007)

• Together with an overall evaluation of the importance of the territorial factors on the study areas (results available in the fall 2007)

WP6 DeliverablesWP6 Deliverables

• Month 31 (end of January 2008)• Milestone No. 2 for WP6

1 Research paper (study-area specific) on the importance of structural policies and territorial factors

WP6 DeliverablesWP6 Deliverables

• Month 32 (end of February 2008)

• Milestone No. 3 for WP6

• 1 Comparative research paper

timingtiming

• P5 should receive as inputs for WP6 a paper from each partner about all the policies related to the specific areas (translation in English of all local documents) within 2007.

• The Riga meeting (September 2007?) could be a first assessment of these new topics

TERA objective 3TERA objective 3

WP7WP7Leader: HelsinkiLeader: HelsinkiParticipants: all Participants: all

• Specifying new policy interventions which can promote the development of European remote rural areas. The design of these policies would embody those elements of the previous “territorial” analysis most useful for achieving the final goal.

MEETINGSMEETINGS

1. October 2006 CRETE Assessment of WP4 Final plan for WP5 Provisional plan for WP6

2. August/September 2007 RIGA Assessment of WP5 Partial assessment of WP6 Plan for WP7

The last meeting The last meeting

March/April 2008 ABERDEEN Assessment of WP6 (partial) Assessment of WP7

Leave it here for the time being

ConferencesConferences

The mid-Project Conference in Ferrara:End of October 2007

Where to present results from WP5 and first hints for policies

FINAL DEADLINE: JUNE 2008

Final Conference AUGUST 2008 in Ghent (Belgium) at the EAAE

???????????????????

Financial aspectsFinancial aspects → → BeatriceBeatrice

• As you already know our financial officer in Brussels asked us for greater outlays up to the 70% of the first financing, ex art. 180.

After a recognition on all of you, today we know that we are able to reach the due amount with the expenses relative to July and August. Therefore, we can proceed. 

• It is necessary that you compile a new Form C relative to these only two months (July 1 - August 31) and invoice it to us in electronic format.

• In order to simplify this operation we attach the "FormCJuly_August_2006" file where you should just fill your own folder. Please, do not do anything else except filling your page.

• Only once you receive our approval on the electronic format, please send us the paper version with the due signatures in original (two copies).

BeatriceBeatrice

• She would correct your new C Forms

Other issuesOther issues

• New Templates and new Editing. We will supply you them on-line