cms hcal report
DESCRIPTION
CMS HCAL Report. US CMS HADRON CALORIMETER REPORT Andris Skuja University of Maryland US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review Brookhaven National Laboratory May 19, 2003. Hadronic Calorimeter: HCAL. Had Barrel: HB Had Endcaps:HE Had Forward: HF. HO. HB. HF. HE. HCAL : HB Calorimeter (Barrel). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 1
CMS HCAL ReportCMS HCAL ReportCMS HCAL ReportCMS HCAL Report
US CMS HADRON CALORIMETER REPORT
Andris SkujaUniversity of Maryland
US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review
Brookhaven National Laboratory
May 19, 2003
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 2
Hadronic Calorimeter: HCALHadronic Calorimeter: HCALHadronic Calorimeter: HCALHadronic Calorimeter: HCALHad Barrel: HB
Had Endcaps:HE
Had Forward: HF
HB
HE
HF
HO
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 3
Sampling calorimeter: brass (passive) & scintillator (active)Coverage: ||<1.3Depth: 5.8 int (at =0) segmentation: x resolution: ~ 120 %/ 0.087x0.087
20o
E
Completed & assembled 17 layers longitudinally, x = 4 x 16 towers
HCAL : HB Calorimeter HCAL : HB Calorimeter (Barrel)(Barrel)
HCAL : HB Calorimeter HCAL : HB Calorimeter (Barrel)(Barrel)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 4
Total number of int till the last sampling layer of HB is < 8HO: 2 scint. layers around first layer (extend to~11 int )
~ 5% of a 300 GeV energy is leaked outside the HB
HO improves resolution by ~10% at 300 GeV & linearity
Test Beam 2002
Ring 0
Ring 1
Ring 2
HCAL : HO Calorimeter HCAL : HO Calorimeter (Outer)(Outer)
HCAL : HO Calorimeter HCAL : HO Calorimeter (Outer)(Outer)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 5
Completed, assembled, HE-1 installed
Sampling calorimeter: brass (passive) & scintillator (active)Coverage: 1.3<||<3Depth: 10 int segmentation: x resolution: ~ 120%/ 0.087x0.087
E
20o
19 layers longitudinally
HCAL : HE Calorimeter HCAL : HE Calorimeter (Endcap)(Endcap)
HCAL : HE Calorimeter HCAL : HE Calorimeter (Endcap)(Endcap)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 6
Steel absorbers, embedded quartz fibres // to the beam Fast (~10 ns) collection of Cherenkov radiation. Coverage: 3<||<5 segmentation: x Depth: 10 int 10o x 13 towers
Fiber insertion finished by Nov 03
HCAL : HF Calorimeter HCAL : HF Calorimeter (Forward)(Forward)
HCAL : HF Calorimeter HCAL : HF Calorimeter (Forward)(Forward)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 7
HCAL : HE and HBHCAL : HE and HBHCAL : HE and HBHCAL : HE and HB
Back-flange18 Brackets3 Layers of absorber
HE-1 re-installed on YE-1 in Jan/Feb 2003. Only 3mm droop.Mount HE+1 by end of 2003,
HB complete, install onboard electronics by Q2-04
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 8
HBHBHBHB
Both HCAL half-barrels are complete and in their alcove
positions at the CMS hall.
Starting in Autumn 03, electronics will be installed.
After a burn-in period, vertical slice operations will begin and continue until the
CMS magnet test in late 2005.
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 9
Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 10
HCAL Completion and M&O HCAL Completion and M&O HCAL Completion and M&O HCAL Completion and M&O • HCAL Deliverables are stand-alone working calorimeter
modules (HB+, HB-, HE+, HE-, HF+, HF-, 5 units of HO) that are installed and cabled up, but not operating in an integrated manner. This will be done by early ’04.
• Delivery includes HPD’s, Electronics (FE/TRIDAS) and Optical Links from Detectors to Underground Counting Room
• Test beam calibration (’02, ‘03) is NOT M&O• Spares and components needed to keep HCAL operational
are NOT M&O.• There is a vertical slice operations period before installation
underground. This is a period of M&O • Test beam studies called for by operational experience IS
M&O (’04 onward)• Technicians and engineers required to keep an operating
sub-component of HCAL operating (independent of when) ARE M&O
• Physics and simulation software development, calibration data base maintenance IS M&O
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 11
HCAL ScheduleHCAL ScheduleHCAL ScheduleHCAL Schedule
Blue = Project; Green = M&O
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 12
RBX StatusRBX StatusRBX StatusRBX Status
• Efforts in the previous calendar year have been dominated by preparations for test beam.
• The RBX’s house RMs which contain photodetectors (HPD’s for HB and HE), the Front End electronics and Optical Links all in a single Unit. They also house LV/HV Units, Calibration Units and Control Modules.
• The HB RBX’s are complete, except for
• Need to complete cooling channels for full RM production (for 160 units)
• Need CCM (40 units)
• Need Calibration modules (40 units)
• Need LV modules (40 units)
• Services/integration items
• The HE RBX’s are complete except for the items above
• The HO RBX design is being finalized (including RM’s)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 13
HE RBX AssemblyHE RBX AssemblyHE RBX AssemblyHE RBX Assembly
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 14
Shield Wall
SBS
HPD
FE MODULE
12 HTRs perReadout Crate,2 DCC
FRONT-ENDRBXReadout Box (On detector)
READ-OUT CrateTrigger Primitives
Fibers at 1.6 Gb/s3 QIE-channels per fiber
QIE
QIE
QIE
QIE
QIE
QIE
CC
A
GOL
DCC
TTC
GOL
CC
A
HTR
HTR
CAL
REGIONAL
TRIGGER
32 bits@ 40 MHz
16 bits@ 80 MHz
CC
A
S-Link: 64 bits @ 25 MHz
Rack CPU
FE/DAQ ElectronicsFE/DAQ ElectronicsFE/DAQ ElectronicsFE/DAQ Electronics
CLK
HTR
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 15
R&D phase over except for
Understanding a few odd-acting tubes:
Continuing lifetime tests under several different HV conditions Understanding the test beam data from last summer Irradiation of selected tubes
Status:
• Of the 88 still in house, 32 are fully tested, but not yet graded
• The 56 left are mostly tested.
• We have accepted 92 and rejected 22 (which have been returned)
• We have 22 in standby (small discrepancies or odd behavior)
The best guess for yield is therefore 114/136 = 84%, since the standby category would have technically met our contractual specifications.
• Out of 224 production tubes at UMN, 136 have been fully tested/graded
HPD Acquisition & TestingHPD Acquisition & TestingHPD Acquisition & TestingHPD Acquisition & Testing
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 16
Front End ElectronicsFront End ElectronicsFront End ElectronicsFront End ElectronicsPrincipal components:
1. QIE (charge integrator and encoder) Fermilab ASIC• Production wafers are in hand (QIEs meet specs)• Noise levels 3000-4000 electrons rms
2. CCA (channel control ASIC)Fermilab ASIC. Packaged & tested Production chips are in
hand 3. GOL (gigabit optical link) CERN ASIC
• Proto GOL ASIC tested - ok• Gigabit Ethernet protocol at 1.6 Gbits/s• 2 Engineering wafers back from Fab. – have been
packaged and are being tested• Design work under way for GOL tester
4. L4913 (rad hard voltage regulator) STC ASIC from CERN specifications
5. HFE419X-521 (connectorized VCSEL diode)Honeywell standard 2.5 Gbit/sec device
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 17
(Pre-) Production FE Card(Pre-) Production FE Card(Pre-) Production FE Card(Pre-) Production FE Card
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 18
FE Status SummaryFE Status SummaryFE Status SummaryFE Status Summary
1. Steady Progress
QIE development/bench studies – began 1999
2. Front-end electronics are on schedule
Very little schedule float for GOL
Infrastructure at SX5 for burn-in and slice tests must be provided
200 Pre-prod cards have been built Feb/Mar’03
3. Ramping up the nested production, test and assembly lines for readout modules
4. Complete analysis of board level radiation testing
5. Full Production to start July/Aug. ‘03
6. Development of a low-noise cable and connector configuration for the HF photomultipliers
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 19
HCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUSHCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUSHCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUSHCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUS
Collaboration of BU, Fermilab, Maryland and Princeton
• Consists of HTRs, DCCs, Clock, PC Interface
Status of Principal Components• DCC: final boards are produced, firmware in
progress• HTR: Test Beam prototypes are finished,
Firmware in progress, checkout for production boards this summer. Final production anytime after that.
• Clocking scheme is defined and prototypes done
• PC interface is specified and well understood
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 20
Pre-Production Prototype• All (known) hardware
features are implemented
• Firmware underway for TB03 - similar to final
• 2 units under test;8 more ready to stuff
• Based on D0/CMS motherboard and link cards (all produced)
S-Link 64 at front panel
TTC, sTTS(RJ-45's on front panel)
MarylandTTCRx Mezzanine
Data Concentrator (DCC)Data Concentrator (DCC)Data Concentrator (DCC)Data Concentrator (DCC)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 21
HTR Rev 3HTR Rev 3HTR Rev 3HTR Rev 3 Rev 3 will be used in the 2003 testbeam
30 built, tested & shipped to CERN
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 22
HCAL CalibrationHCAL CalibrationHCAL CalibrationHCAL Calibration
Goal: Calibrate from test beam to 3 TeV. Time HCAL electronics.
Monitor performance, including radiation damage.Tools: 1. Nitrogen laser distributed to each sub-detector.
Excites scintillator 2. Laser injects light to photo-detectors.
3. LEDs (fast) inject light to photodetector. Programmable pulser.
4. Moving wire radioactive source for long term calibration.
5. Charge injection to ADC’s (QIE).Specialized calibration modules designed and built to achieve
goals.
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 23
Calibration ModulesCalibration ModulesInside Readout BoxesInside Readout BoxesCalibration ModulesCalibration Modules
Inside Readout BoxesInside Readout Boxes HB Module HE Module
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 24
HCAL DCS StatusHCAL DCS StatusHCAL DCS StatusHCAL DCS Status
DCS is the Detector Control System. It monitors the Detector and performs what used to be called “Slow controls”
The low level servers of HCAL control subsystems are almost ready.
All defined server prototypes tested during beam-test in June-September of 2002. Bugs found and fixed.
HCAL is in the vanguard of DCS on CMS
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 25
HF statusHF statusHF statusHF status
The HF is a diversified project consisting of contributions from many nations as well as CERN.
All detector mechanical components (wedges, strongbacks, backplanes) have been delivered ahead of schedule and are at CERN.
Production of HF tables is well advanced: for the first one, the welding and thermal treatment is done and is being machined now, for the second, the welding is complete.
Production of the support outer shield has started for the first HF. Contracts for machining placed. Expect delivery of first table+shields at end of September 03. Second set by spring 2004.
All PMTs have been delivered to IOWA and testing is >90% complete
85% of quartz fibers have been delivered to CERN and are being cleaved and bundled in Hungary
21/36 wedges will be completed in May ‘03
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 26
Fiber stuffing at CERNFiber stuffing at CERNFiber stuffing at CERNFiber stuffing at CERN
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 27
HCAL M&OHCAL M&OHCAL M&OHCAL M&O
There was a Lehman review at FNAL on April 8, 9 & 10. The M&O proposal for CMS was baselined (budget approved).
• Engineering personnel and techs at CERN for detector maintenance (shared with EMU)
• “Slice Test” as pre-ops during 2004-2006
• Test Beam work beginning in 2004
• Physics monitoring at CERN
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 28
US HCAL StatusUS HCAL StatusUS HCAL StatusUS HCAL Status
US HCAL Contingency Allocation
$32,624
$6,706$2,781
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
HCAL
AY
K$
Scope Contingency
Base Contingency
May98 Baseline
US HCAL EAC = $42,891K AY
82%
18%Work Complete
Work Remaining
Remaining taks:• Finish FE/TRIDAS
electronics• HPD acquisition &
testing• Finish RBX’s,
RM’s,Calibration Modules
Contingency use:• Electronics• Optical Links• Scope expansion
(including HF fiber)
Endgame risks:• HPD schedule (also
drives RM completion)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 29
US HCAL Transition to M&OUS HCAL Transition to M&OUS HCAL Transition to M&OUS HCAL Transition to M&O
We expect a smooth transition from Project completion to Pre-ops (M&O phase) if HPD delivery finished in ’03.
US CMS HCAL Proj / M&O Cost Estimate
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
AY
K$
HCAL CP
HCAL M&O
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 30
Recent HCAL Recent HCAL Milestone Performance (v33)Milestone Performance (v33)
Recent HCAL Recent HCAL Milestone Performance (v33)Milestone Performance (v33)
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 31
US HCAL Project ResourcesUS HCAL Project ResourcesUS HCAL Project ResourcesUS HCAL Project Resources
US CMS HCAL Constr Proj Resources
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0FY
98
FY99
FY00
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FT
E's Physicists
Technicians
Engineers + Comp. Prof.
Engineer phase out on project is mirrored by an increase of engineering staff at CERN
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 32
US HCAL M&O ResourcesUS HCAL M&O ResourcesUS HCAL M&O ResourcesUS HCAL M&O Resources
M&O resources appear adequate at this point
US CMS HCAL M&O Resources
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08
FT
E's
Physicists
Technicians
Comp. Prof.
Engineers
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 33
US HCAL FY03 PlanningUS HCAL FY03 PlanningUS HCAL FY03 PlanningUS HCAL FY03 Planning
HCAL SOWs FY03 -- $6.1M AY
Boston University
Fairfield University
Fermilab
Florida Institute of Technology
Florida State University
University of Illinois-Chicago
University of Iowa
Iowa State University
University of Maryland
University of Minnesota
University of Mississippi
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Northeastern University
University of Notre Dame
Princeton University
Purdue University
University of Rochester
Texas Tech University