cms hcal report

33
Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 1 CMS HCAL Report CMS HCAL Report US CMS HADRON CALORIMETER REPORT Andris Skuja University of Maryland US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review Brookhaven National Laboratory May 19, 2003

Upload: romaine-cesar

Post on 30-Dec-2015

52 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

CMS HCAL Report. US CMS HADRON CALORIMETER REPORT Andris Skuja University of Maryland US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review Brookhaven National Laboratory May 19, 2003. Hadronic Calorimeter: HCAL. Had Barrel: HB Had Endcaps:HE Had Forward: HF. HO. HB. HF. HE. HCAL : HB Calorimeter (Barrel). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 1

CMS HCAL ReportCMS HCAL ReportCMS HCAL ReportCMS HCAL Report

US CMS HADRON CALORIMETER REPORT

Andris SkujaUniversity of Maryland

US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review

Brookhaven National Laboratory

May 19, 2003

Page 2: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 2

Hadronic Calorimeter: HCALHadronic Calorimeter: HCALHadronic Calorimeter: HCALHadronic Calorimeter: HCALHad Barrel: HB

Had Endcaps:HE

Had Forward: HF

HB

HE

HF

HO

Page 3: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 3

Sampling calorimeter: brass (passive) & scintillator (active)Coverage: ||<1.3Depth: 5.8 int (at =0) segmentation: x resolution: ~ 120 %/ 0.087x0.087

20o

E

Completed & assembled 17 layers longitudinally, x = 4 x 16 towers

HCAL : HB Calorimeter HCAL : HB Calorimeter (Barrel)(Barrel)

HCAL : HB Calorimeter HCAL : HB Calorimeter (Barrel)(Barrel)

Page 4: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 4

Total number of int till the last sampling layer of HB is < 8HO: 2 scint. layers around first layer (extend to~11 int )

~ 5% of a 300 GeV energy is leaked outside the HB

HO improves resolution by ~10% at 300 GeV & linearity

Test Beam 2002

Ring 0

Ring 1

Ring 2

HCAL : HO Calorimeter HCAL : HO Calorimeter (Outer)(Outer)

HCAL : HO Calorimeter HCAL : HO Calorimeter (Outer)(Outer)

Page 5: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 5

Completed, assembled, HE-1 installed

Sampling calorimeter: brass (passive) & scintillator (active)Coverage: 1.3<||<3Depth: 10 int segmentation: x resolution: ~ 120%/ 0.087x0.087

E

20o

19 layers longitudinally

HCAL : HE Calorimeter HCAL : HE Calorimeter (Endcap)(Endcap)

HCAL : HE Calorimeter HCAL : HE Calorimeter (Endcap)(Endcap)

Page 6: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 6

Steel absorbers, embedded quartz fibres // to the beam Fast (~10 ns) collection of Cherenkov radiation. Coverage: 3<||<5 segmentation: x Depth: 10 int 10o x 13 towers

Fiber insertion finished by Nov 03

HCAL : HF Calorimeter HCAL : HF Calorimeter (Forward)(Forward)

HCAL : HF Calorimeter HCAL : HF Calorimeter (Forward)(Forward)

Page 7: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 7

HCAL : HE and HBHCAL : HE and HBHCAL : HE and HBHCAL : HE and HB

Back-flange18 Brackets3 Layers of absorber

HE-1 re-installed on YE-1 in Jan/Feb 2003. Only 3mm droop.Mount HE+1 by end of 2003,

HB complete, install onboard electronics by Q2-04

Page 8: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 8

HBHBHBHB

Both HCAL half-barrels are complete and in their alcove

positions at the CMS hall.

Starting in Autumn 03, electronics will be installed.

After a burn-in period, vertical slice operations will begin and continue until the

CMS magnet test in late 2005.

Page 9: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 9

Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility Permanent H2 Testbeam Facility

Page 10: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 10

HCAL Completion and M&O HCAL Completion and M&O HCAL Completion and M&O HCAL Completion and M&O • HCAL Deliverables are stand-alone working calorimeter

modules (HB+, HB-, HE+, HE-, HF+, HF-, 5 units of HO) that are installed and cabled up, but not operating in an integrated manner. This will be done by early ’04.

• Delivery includes HPD’s, Electronics (FE/TRIDAS) and Optical Links from Detectors to Underground Counting Room

• Test beam calibration (’02, ‘03) is NOT M&O• Spares and components needed to keep HCAL operational

are NOT M&O.• There is a vertical slice operations period before installation

underground. This is a period of M&O • Test beam studies called for by operational experience IS

M&O (’04 onward)• Technicians and engineers required to keep an operating

sub-component of HCAL operating (independent of when) ARE M&O

• Physics and simulation software development, calibration data base maintenance IS M&O

Page 11: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 11

HCAL ScheduleHCAL ScheduleHCAL ScheduleHCAL Schedule

Blue = Project; Green = M&O

Page 12: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 12

RBX StatusRBX StatusRBX StatusRBX Status

• Efforts in the previous calendar year have been dominated by preparations for test beam.

• The RBX’s house RMs which contain photodetectors (HPD’s for HB and HE), the Front End electronics and Optical Links all in a single Unit. They also house LV/HV Units, Calibration Units and Control Modules.

• The HB RBX’s are complete, except for

• Need to complete cooling channels for full RM production (for 160 units)

• Need CCM (40 units)

• Need Calibration modules (40 units)

• Need LV modules (40 units)

• Services/integration items

• The HE RBX’s are complete except for the items above

• The HO RBX design is being finalized (including RM’s)

Page 13: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 13

HE RBX AssemblyHE RBX AssemblyHE RBX AssemblyHE RBX Assembly

Page 14: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 14

Shield Wall

SBS

HPD

FE MODULE

12 HTRs perReadout Crate,2 DCC

FRONT-ENDRBXReadout Box (On detector)

READ-OUT CrateTrigger Primitives

Fibers at 1.6 Gb/s3 QIE-channels per fiber

QIE

QIE

QIE

QIE

QIE

QIE

CC

A

GOL

DCC

TTC

GOL

CC

A

HTR

HTR

CAL

REGIONAL

TRIGGER

32 bits@ 40 MHz

16 bits@ 80 MHz

CC

A

S-Link: 64 bits @ 25 MHz

Rack CPU

FE/DAQ ElectronicsFE/DAQ ElectronicsFE/DAQ ElectronicsFE/DAQ Electronics

CLK

HTR

Page 15: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 15

R&D phase over except for

Understanding a few odd-acting tubes:

Continuing lifetime tests under several different HV conditions Understanding the test beam data from last summer Irradiation of selected tubes

Status:

• Of the 88 still in house, 32 are fully tested, but not yet graded

• The 56 left are mostly tested.

• We have accepted 92 and rejected 22 (which have been returned)

• We have 22 in standby (small discrepancies or odd behavior)

The best guess for yield is therefore 114/136 = 84%, since the standby category would have technically met our contractual specifications.

• Out of 224 production tubes at UMN, 136 have been fully tested/graded

HPD Acquisition & TestingHPD Acquisition & TestingHPD Acquisition & TestingHPD Acquisition & Testing

Page 16: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 16

Front End ElectronicsFront End ElectronicsFront End ElectronicsFront End ElectronicsPrincipal components:

1. QIE (charge integrator and encoder) Fermilab ASIC• Production wafers are in hand (QIEs meet specs)• Noise levels 3000-4000 electrons rms

2. CCA (channel control ASIC)Fermilab ASIC. Packaged & tested Production chips are in

hand 3. GOL (gigabit optical link) CERN ASIC

• Proto GOL ASIC tested - ok• Gigabit Ethernet protocol at 1.6 Gbits/s• 2 Engineering wafers back from Fab. – have been

packaged and are being tested• Design work under way for GOL tester

4. L4913 (rad hard voltage regulator) STC ASIC from CERN specifications

5. HFE419X-521 (connectorized VCSEL diode)Honeywell standard 2.5 Gbit/sec device

Page 17: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 17

(Pre-) Production FE Card(Pre-) Production FE Card(Pre-) Production FE Card(Pre-) Production FE Card

Page 18: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 18

FE Status SummaryFE Status SummaryFE Status SummaryFE Status Summary

1. Steady Progress

QIE development/bench studies – began 1999

2. Front-end electronics are on schedule

Very little schedule float for GOL

Infrastructure at SX5 for burn-in and slice tests must be provided

200 Pre-prod cards have been built Feb/Mar’03

3. Ramping up the nested production, test and assembly lines for readout modules

4. Complete analysis of board level radiation testing

5. Full Production to start July/Aug. ‘03

6. Development of a low-noise cable and connector configuration for the HF photomultipliers

Page 19: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 19

HCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUSHCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUSHCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUSHCAL TRIDAS/DAQ STATUS

Collaboration of BU, Fermilab, Maryland and Princeton

• Consists of HTRs, DCCs, Clock, PC Interface

Status of Principal Components• DCC: final boards are produced, firmware in

progress• HTR: Test Beam prototypes are finished,

Firmware in progress, checkout for production boards this summer. Final production anytime after that.

• Clocking scheme is defined and prototypes done

• PC interface is specified and well understood

Page 20: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 20

Pre-Production Prototype• All (known) hardware

features are implemented

• Firmware underway for TB03 - similar to final

• 2 units under test;8 more ready to stuff

• Based on D0/CMS motherboard and link cards (all produced)

S-Link 64 at front panel

TTC, sTTS(RJ-45's on front panel)

MarylandTTCRx Mezzanine

Data Concentrator (DCC)Data Concentrator (DCC)Data Concentrator (DCC)Data Concentrator (DCC)

Page 21: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 21

HTR Rev 3HTR Rev 3HTR Rev 3HTR Rev 3 Rev 3 will be used in the 2003 testbeam

30 built, tested & shipped to CERN

Page 22: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 22

HCAL CalibrationHCAL CalibrationHCAL CalibrationHCAL Calibration

Goal: Calibrate from test beam to 3 TeV. Time HCAL electronics.

Monitor performance, including radiation damage.Tools: 1. Nitrogen laser distributed to each sub-detector.

Excites scintillator 2. Laser injects light to photo-detectors.

3. LEDs (fast) inject light to photodetector. Programmable pulser.

4. Moving wire radioactive source for long term calibration.

5. Charge injection to ADC’s (QIE).Specialized calibration modules designed and built to achieve

goals.

Page 23: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 23

Calibration ModulesCalibration ModulesInside Readout BoxesInside Readout BoxesCalibration ModulesCalibration Modules

Inside Readout BoxesInside Readout Boxes HB Module HE Module

Page 24: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 24

HCAL DCS StatusHCAL DCS StatusHCAL DCS StatusHCAL DCS Status

DCS is the Detector Control System. It monitors the Detector and performs what used to be called “Slow controls”

The low level servers of HCAL control subsystems are almost ready.

All defined server prototypes tested during beam-test in June-September of 2002. Bugs found and fixed.

HCAL is in the vanguard of DCS on CMS

Page 25: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 25

HF statusHF statusHF statusHF status

The HF is a diversified project consisting of contributions from many nations as well as CERN.

All detector mechanical components (wedges, strongbacks, backplanes) have been delivered ahead of schedule and are at CERN.

Production of HF tables is well advanced: for the first one, the welding and thermal treatment is done and is being machined now, for the second, the welding is complete.

Production of the support outer shield has started for the first HF. Contracts for machining placed. Expect delivery of first table+shields at end of September 03. Second set by spring 2004.

All PMTs have been delivered to IOWA and testing is >90% complete

85% of quartz fibers have been delivered to CERN and are being cleaved and bundled in Hungary

21/36 wedges will be completed in May ‘03

Page 26: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 26

Fiber stuffing at CERNFiber stuffing at CERNFiber stuffing at CERNFiber stuffing at CERN

Page 27: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 27

HCAL M&OHCAL M&OHCAL M&OHCAL M&O

There was a Lehman review at FNAL on April 8, 9 & 10. The M&O proposal for CMS was baselined (budget approved).

• Engineering personnel and techs at CERN for detector maintenance (shared with EMU)

• “Slice Test” as pre-ops during 2004-2006

• Test Beam work beginning in 2004

• Physics monitoring at CERN

Page 28: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 28

US HCAL StatusUS HCAL StatusUS HCAL StatusUS HCAL Status

US HCAL Contingency Allocation

$32,624

$6,706$2,781

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

$40,000

$45,000

HCAL

AY

K$

Scope Contingency

Base Contingency

May98 Baseline

US HCAL EAC = $42,891K AY

82%

18%Work Complete

Work Remaining

Remaining taks:• Finish FE/TRIDAS

electronics• HPD acquisition &

testing• Finish RBX’s,

RM’s,Calibration Modules

Contingency use:• Electronics• Optical Links• Scope expansion

(including HF fiber)

Endgame risks:• HPD schedule (also

drives RM completion)

Page 29: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 29

US HCAL Transition to M&OUS HCAL Transition to M&OUS HCAL Transition to M&OUS HCAL Transition to M&O

We expect a smooth transition from Project completion to Pre-ops (M&O phase) if HPD delivery finished in ’03.

US CMS HCAL Proj / M&O Cost Estimate

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

AY

K$

HCAL CP

HCAL M&O

Page 30: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 30

Recent HCAL Recent HCAL Milestone Performance (v33)Milestone Performance (v33)

Recent HCAL Recent HCAL Milestone Performance (v33)Milestone Performance (v33)

Page 31: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 31

US HCAL Project ResourcesUS HCAL Project ResourcesUS HCAL Project ResourcesUS HCAL Project Resources

US CMS HCAL Constr Proj Resources

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0FY

98

FY99

FY00

FY01

FY02

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FT

E's Physicists

Technicians

Engineers + Comp. Prof.

Engineer phase out on project is mirrored by an increase of engineering staff at CERN

Page 32: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 32

US HCAL M&O ResourcesUS HCAL M&O ResourcesUS HCAL M&O ResourcesUS HCAL M&O Resources

M&O resources appear adequate at this point

US CMS HCAL M&O Resources

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08

FT

E's

Physicists

Technicians

Comp. Prof.

Engineers

Page 33: CMS HCAL Report

Andris Skuja: US CMS Annual DOE/NSF Review, May 19, 2003 33

US HCAL FY03 PlanningUS HCAL FY03 PlanningUS HCAL FY03 PlanningUS HCAL FY03 Planning

HCAL SOWs FY03 -- $6.1M AY

Boston University

Fairfield University

Fermilab

Florida Institute of Technology

Florida State University

University of Illinois-Chicago

University of Iowa

Iowa State University

University of Maryland

University of Minnesota

University of Mississippi

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Northeastern University

University of Notre Dame

Princeton University

Purdue University

University of Rochester

Texas Tech University