cloudnet meeting: malcolm brooks, april 2005 observatoire de paris
DESCRIPTION
CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris. Contents. The presentation covers the following sections. Cloud fraction means IWC means Filtering model IWC to mimic obs problems Adiabatic LWC means Filtering model LWC? Categorizing profiles by Met. Regimes. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 1
CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005
Observatoire de Paris
![Page 2: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 2
Contents
Cloud fraction means
IWC meansFiltering model IWC to mimic obs problems
Adiabatic LWC meansFiltering model LWC?
Categorizing profiles by Met. Regimes
The presentation covers the following sections
![Page 3: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 3
Cloud fraction means
![Page 4: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 4
IWC means
![Page 5: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 5
Filtering Model IWC
The observations are filtered by removing profiles with rain or unknown liquid water attenuation.
At each model level, we need to characterise the effect this has on the observed IWC distribution – so we can apply the same effect to filter the observations.
![Page 6: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 6
Filtering Model IWC
Step 1:
Observed and model distirutions of IWC are normalised, so as to be comparable.
![Page 7: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 7
Filtering Model IWC
Step 2:
The ratio of the unfiltered IWC to the filtered IWC is calculated in the observations.
The varies with the Normalised IWC
![Page 8: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 8
Filtering Model IWC
Step 3:
Use a fit of this ratio to filter the model IWC, as the normalised IWC varies.
![Page 9: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 9
Filtering Model IWC
Step 5:
Convert the Normalised model IWC back to real units….
![Page 10: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 10
IWC means – After filtering model IWC
![Page 11: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 11
IWC means – Compare with ’99-’00 at Chilbolton
![Page 12: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 12
LWC means
- - - Dashed black line shows adiabatic LWC
The Observed LWC appears higher than all the observations shown.
When radiometers not usable, assumed to be adiabatic: some filtering required equivalent to the work done on the IWC?
![Page 13: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 13
Regimes
• What criteria to use to define the “background meteorology”?
- Vertical velocity (smoothed)
- Boundary layer stability.
• Which models will these be obtained from?
- “ensemble approach”
• How will the thresholds be defined?
![Page 14: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 14
Regimes
Cloud data Source
ω data source (Pa s-1)
Met Office
ECMWF Mean (UKMO, ECMWF)
Observed clouds
7+ km
-0.17 -0.22 -0.23
0-3 km
-0.06 -0.09 -0.07
Met Office clouds
7+ km
-0.16 -0.24 -0.23
0-3 km
-0.11 -0.19 -0.16
ECMWF clouds
7+ km
-0.14 -0.41 -0.26
0-3 km
-0.03 -0.23 -0.12
Correlations between cloud fraction and vertical velocity:
Chilbolton, ’99-’00
![Page 15: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 15
Regimes
Cloud data Source
ω data source (Pa s-1)
Met Office
ECMWF Mean (UKMO, ECMWF)
Observed clouds
7+ km
-0.17 -0.22 -0.23
0-3 km
-0.06 -0.09 -0.07
Met Office clouds
7+ km
-0.16 -0.24 -0.23
0-3 km
-0.11 -0.19 -0.16
ECMWF clouds
7+ km
-0.14 -0.41 -0.26
0-3 km
-0.03 -0.23 -0.12
![Page 16: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 16
Regimes – vertical velocity
Not all models are included to define regimes:
RACMO – uses ECMWF analyses
Met Office Global model – too similar to the Mesoscale model
![Page 17: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 17
Regimes – vertical velocity
Regime criteria are normalised to account for the different distributions from the different models.
![Page 18: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 18
←Neutral tercile
Regimes – vertical velocity
←Ascending tercileDescending tercile →
![Page 19: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 19
Regimes – effect of vertical velocity at 500hPa
Descending tercile Neutral tercile Ascending tercile
![Page 20: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 20
Regimes - boundary layer stability
![Page 21: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 21
Regimes – boundary layer stability
![Page 22: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 22
Regimes – effects of boundary layer stability
<< Most Stable Stable/Neutral Convective/Neutral Convective >>
![Page 23: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 23
Regimes – Combined regimes
Vertical Velocity
What is it?750 hPa 300 hPa
Down/Neutral Down/Neutral Anticyclonic conditions
Ascent Down/Neutral Low level fronts
Down/Neutral Ascent Ahead of surface fronts,
Ascent Ascent General Ascent!
Combined with 3 Boundary layer types, gives 12 combinations!
![Page 24: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 24
Regimes – Combined regimes
Convective BL:
Neutral BL:
Stable BL:
300hPa / 750hPa: ↓ / ↓ ↓ / ↑ ↑ / ↓ ↑ / ↑
![Page 25: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 25
Regimes – Combined regimes – DJF only
Convective BL:
Neutral BL:
Stable BL:
300hPa / 750hPa: ↓ / ↓ ↓ / ↑ ↑ / ↓ ↑ / ↑
![Page 26: CloudNET meeting: Malcolm Brooks, April 2005 Observatoire de Paris](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56813e5a550346895da855a0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 26
Conclusions
• Model IWC can be filtered to mimic instrumental effects:
models do not agree with CloudNET IWC means – algorithm changed since ’99-’00 period.
Comparisons with more radar/lidar algorithms would be useful.
• Comparison of adiabatic LWC with models shows large disagreements
more work needed on what the observations mean.
• Regimes defined using vertical velocity and boundary layer stability are useful.
• Combining the ascent/ descent at 300 and 750 hPa and the boundary layer stability gives a ‘final’ regime definition.