clinical question: do therapeutic exercise for hemiplegic arm cause the shoulder pain in patients...
TRANSCRIPT
Clinical Question: Do therapeutic exercise for hemiplegic a
rm cause the shoulder pain in patients with stroke?
Searching databank: MEDLINE, PubMed,CINAL
Searching strategy: [ rehabilitation & ( adverse effect or harm or complication or side effect ) & stroke ] ; [ physical therapy technique & ( adverse effect or harm or complication or side effect ) & stroke ] ; [ exercise therapy & ( adverse effect or harm or complication or side effect ) & stroke ]
Limitation: English and human and clinical trial
Citation
Kumar R, Metter EJ, Mehta AJ, Chew T: Shoulder
pain in hemiplegia - the role of exercise. Am J Phys
Med Rehabil 1990;69:205-8.
Introduction (1)
Exercise is the most important therapy in restoration of physical independence in patients with stroke.
PROM is done when there is no voluntary movement in the extremities to avoid joint contracture; AROM and AAROM are added to the program when the patients starts to regain voluntary control.
Introduction (2)
three type of exercises commonly used during rehabilitation of the UE in patients with stroke Passive range of motion (PROMT) Skate board (SB) Overhead pulley (OP)
Purpose of the study To evaluate whether any of these exercises could
initiate shoulder pain in patients with stroke
Methods (1)
First stroken=48
Receive therapy before
admission n=10
Already developed painn=8
could’n’t complete the program n=2
Severe aphasia and cognitionDysfunction n=6
PROMTn=12
SBn=8
OPn=8
Methods (2)
Initial evaluation: subluxation of the shoulder , PROM for the upper limb, muscle strength (MMT)
Outcome measures: pain at rest or during PROM Record “ yes “ or “ no “ Every month for 3 months Blinded evaluator A.J.M
Intervention: performed by OT only 1 / day * 5 days/wk * ? Wks
Presence of shoulder pain
Results (1)
PROM SB OPNo. of patients 12 8 8
Age (yr) 63.2 70.1 60.8
Onset to treatment interval (d)
14.5+1.51 15.1+3.40 13.8+2.36
No. of patients who developed shoulder pain
1 (8%) 1 (12%) 5 (63%)
No. of patients who did not have shoulder pain
11 (92%) 7 (88%) 3 (37%)
25% (7/28) developed shoulder ; 71% patients in OP group
* p<.05 * p<.05
Results (2)
Motion
Mean ROM
t pWithout pain With pain
Adduction 153+24 96+21 5.6 <0.01
Flexion 165+10 89+41 8.1 <0.01
IR 43+2 38+4 4.40 <0.01
ER 36+10 20+12 3.49 <0.01
Results (3)
ROMT SB OP Total
Subluxation( n=13)
Pain
No pain
1 0 3 4
5 4 0 9
No subluxation( n=15)
Pain
0 1 2 3
No pain 6 3 3 12
No sig difference btw groups, p=0.62
Results (4)
ROMT SB OP Total
Poor strength( n=16 )
Pain
No pain
1 1 3 5
8 3 0 11
Fair strength( n=12 )
Pain
0 0 2 2
No pain 3 3 4 10
No sig difference btw groups, p=0.25
Relative risk (1)
Adverse outcome
( shoulder pain) Totals
+ –
Expose to treatment
OP 5 (a) 3 (b)8
PROM 1 (c) 11 (d)12
Totals 6 14 20
Relative Risk = RR = [a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)] =(5/8) / (1/12) =7.5
Severe adverse event ( if OR>3)
Relative odds (2)
Adverse outcome
( shoulder pain) Totals
+ –
Expose to treatment
OP 5 (a) 3 (b)8
SB 1 (c) 7 (d)8
Totals 6 10 16
Relative Risk = RR = [a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)] =(5/8) / (1/8) =5
Severe adverse event ( if OR>3)
Relative odds (3)
Adverse outcome
( shoulder pain) Totals
+ –
Expose to treatment
SB 1 (a) 7 (b)8
PROMT 1 (c) 11 (d)12
Totals 2 18 20
Relative Risk = RR = [a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)] =(1/8) / (1/12) =1.5
Minor adverse event
Relative odds (4)
Adverse outcome
( shoulder pain) Totals
+ –
Expose to treatment
OP 5 (a) 3 (b)8
SB+PROM 2 (c) 18 (d)20
Totals 7 21 28
Relative Risk = RR = [a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)] =(5/8) / (2/20) =6.25
Severe adverse event ( if OR>3)