clg t3 q1-q2
TRANSCRIPT
8/19/2019 CLG T3 Q1-Q2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clg-t3-q1-q2 1/4
TUTORIAL 3
Corporate Law & Governance
8/19/2019 CLG T3 Q1-Q2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clg-t3-q1-q2 2/4
1) Explain the doctrine of ultra vires in company
law. To what extent is it applicable in alaysia.
• !ny act by the company that is beyond the co"s
ob#ect clause is re$arded as ultra vires%uv) .
• !t common law !shbury"s case state an uv
transaction is null and void.
•
'n alaysia a transaction is still bindin$ onthe co even if it is ultra vires. (ut there are
exceptions.
8/19/2019 CLG T3 Q1-Q2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clg-t3-q1-q2 3/4
3 Exceptions
• *ection +,%+)%a) – ! member can apply to court to stop an uv act.
• *ection +,%+)%b) – ! member or the company may sue the directors-
officers for uv if they breach the ob#ect clauses.
•*ection +,%+)%c) – The minister can petition to wind up the company
if the company acted uv.
8/19/2019 CLG T3 Q1-Q2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clg-t3-q1-q2 4/4
+) iscuss the effect of section of the
Companies !ct 1/0.
Effect of M&A (S33).
• ember can enforce provisions in the !! only in their
capacity as a member and not in any other capacity
such as director solicitor or promoter. – Eley v 2ositive Government *ecurity Life !ssurance Co
• The &! has the effect of bindin$ the members
amon$ themselves
– 3ayfield v 4ands
• 5utsiders are not privy to the contract and thus cannot
enforce any ri$ht.
–
Eley"s case.