claim #1076664 mcilraith township. patricia mining division

STUARTON RESOURCES LIMITED REPORT OF ASSESSMENT WORK

CLAIM #1076664 Mcilraith Township. Patricia Mining Division

This report has been prepared in accordance with Sect.11. of the Mining Act. Revised Statutes of Ontario. 1990. Chapter M.14. pp. 119 and 120.

Both geophysical and geochemical survey work was carried out by Stuarton Resources Limited (SRL) as part of an integrated program to relocate undrilled targets in an area which has been extensively explored by several major mining companies during the 1970's.

************

CONCLUSIONS SL RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. An undrilled mag-EM anomaly, which is favorably located with respect to an intermediate-basic volcanic rock contact, has been re-located.

2. It is recommended that this EM-anomaly be tested further by the MMI survey method.

3. A previously unknown mag-VLF anomaly has been detected north of the EM-anomaly. This VLF anomaly has been tested by one line of MMI soil geochemistry samples. Increased concentration of copper and zinc was found to coincide with the VLF-axis.

4. If increased concentrations of economically interesting metals are found to coincide with the re-located EM-anomaly, it is recommended that the anomaly be tested by trenching and/or drilling.

Lionel C. KilburnPresidentStuarton Resources LimitedMay 9, 1997

52K02SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH 010

STUARTON RESOURCES LIMITED REPORT OF ASSESSMENT WORK - Claim #1076664

Patricia Mining Division Ontario Regulation 116/91

INTRODUCTION

This report has been prepared in accordance with Sect.11. of the o Mining Act. Revised Statutes of Ontario. 1990. Chapter M.14. pp. 119 g and 120. Each section of this report follows in sequence those requirements set forth in Section 11, of the Mining Act

Both geophysical and geochemical survey work was carried out by Stuarton Resources Limited (SRL) as part of an integrated program to relocate undrilled targets in an area which has been extensively explored by several major mining companies during the 1970's.

Geophysical work consisted of magnetometer (mag) and Very Low Frequency (VLF) electromagnetic surveys. One previously unknown VLF anomaly has been discovered and tested using Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) geochemistry over glacial outwash overburden.

A brief description of the MMI method is set forth in the attached two page review, which appeared in the May 1996 issue, No. 52, pp.14 S 15, of The Gangue, which is the publication of the Mineral Deposits Division of the Geological Association of Canada.

TABLE OF CONTENTSPage

Introduction 1Table of Contents 1List of Illustrations 2Location 3Claim Holder 3Access 3Key Map 3Author of this report 3Field supervisors 3Dates work performed 4Survey specifications 5Statement of financial expenditures 7Conclusions and recommendations 8

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Page

Maps Bound in Text

Map-1 - access roads 9 Key Map - relative positions of survey grids A claim 10 Mobile Metal Ions, a New Mineral Exploration Tool (technical

description of method) 11 Mobile Metal Ion Survey - Sample Collection Method 12 Profile of Metal Content - Mobile Metal Ion (ppb)

Anomaly 30-7A 13 XRAL Laboratories Certificate, July 8, 1996 (2 sides) 14 XRAL Laboratories Certificate, July 22, 1996 (2 sides) 15

Maps at back of report in pockets

Geophysical Maps November 1995 Grid (scale- 1:4.800^:Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Postings Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Profiles Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Contours

Geophysical Maps April Grid (scale- 1:2.500):Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Postings Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Profiles Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Contours VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase

and Quadrature Postings VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase

and Quadrature Profiles VLF-Electromagnetic - Fraser Filtered In-phase Data

Geophysical Maps April 8c June Grids combined (scale- 1:2.500):Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Postings Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Profiles Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Contours VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase

and Quadrature Postings VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase

and Quadrature Profiles VLF-Electromagnetic - Fraser Filtered

In-phase Data

Geochemical Map April Grid (Scale- 1:2.500) Location and Copper, Zinc Lead 8t Cadmium Contents (ppb) of MMI samples

plotted on map titled "Fraser Filtered In-phase Data"

Claim Map #2882, Mcilraith Township, District of Patricia

2

LOCATION: a ll of these surveys are located within Claim #1076664; Mcilraith Twp., Ontario; 500 00' North latitude and 920 30' West longitude; and may be found on Claim Map #G2882.

CLAIM HOLDER: Stuarton Resources Limited (Client #301184), 178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville, Ontario, L6K 2H6

ACCESS: The area is easily accessible by road from either Dryden or Sioux Lookout. An all weather road leads from Dryden past Dryden Airport, along the southeast side of Gullwing Lake, thence northwards between Gullwing and Tot Lakes, and then eastwards to Hudson, Ontario. Hudson is connected by paved road to Sioux Lookout.

An all weather road branches westwards from this through-road and passes through the Claim #1076664 (see Map-1, access roads).

KEY MAP: Position of Claim #1076664 is shown with respect to identifiable topographic features and township boundaries or established survey lines, stations or markers on the Key Map and the accompanying claim map #G2882.

AUTHOR OF THIS REPORT: Lionel C. Kilburn, P.Eng, BSc, MSc, PhD

FIELD SUPERVISORS: These surveys were carried out under the supervision of the author of this report. Field work for geophysical surveys was carried out by Dusan Dmitrovic, 2592 Hammond Road, Mississauga, Ontario, K5K 1T2 (ph: 905-823-3195), and for the geochemical survey by Lionel C. Kilburn, 178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville, Ontario, L6K 2H6 (ph: 905-845-3650)

DATES WORK PERFORMED:

1. November 1995 - reconnaissance magnetometer survey to locate the approximate position of a magnetic anomaly detected by Selco in 1978. Cost of this survey consisted of travelling expenses from Toronto, accomodation and food at Sioux Lookout, use of a magnetometer for two days, and two days wages.

2. April 1996 - magnetometer and Very Low Frequency (VLF) electromagnetic survey of a grid over the Selco magnetic target which was located the previous November. Cost of this survey consisted of travelling and living expenses of the field operator, use of the mag-VLF equipment for two days, and drafting and compilation of the results. Unfortunately the field operator did not carry out the survey in the correct location and it had to be done again in June.

3. June 1996 - magnetometer and VLF electromagnetic survey of a grid over the Selco magnetic target which had been located the previous November. Cost of this survey consisted of travelling and living expenses of the field operator, use of the mag-VLF equipment for two days, and drafting and compilation of the results. This time, L. C. Kilburn accompanied the field operator to make sure that the survey was properly located.

During the second geophysical survey in June. Kilburn carried out collection of samples for a geochemical survey using the Mobile Metal Ion technique (MMI). Analyses of these samples were carried out by XRAL at no charge, as a test of the method and to encourage use of the technique.

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS: ( all grids are marked by flagging)

Geophysics November 1995 GridGrid size- 242 meters (800') X 394 meters (1,300')

line spacing = 1 51 S 91 meters (500' a 300')Length base line = 242 metersTotal length surveyed lines = 1,424 meters (4,700')Spacing of readings = 30 meters (100')

Note: grid is marked on the ground and recorded in British system of measure, and converted to metric for this report.

Survey equipment - UNIMAG total field magnetometer as follows:

(i) total field magnetometer (sensitivity 10y) (ii) base value - 58,000y

Geophysics April 1996 GridGrid size- 550 meters X 350 meters

line spacing = 50 metersLength base line = 550 metersTotal length survey lines = 350 metersSpacing of readings = 25 meters

Survey equipment - EDM OMNI PLUS combined magnetometer and VLF detector as follows:

(i) total field magnetometer (sensitivity= 1y)(ii) base value - 59,OOOnT(iii) electonic correction for magnetic diurnal variation

made automatically at intervals of one minute and recorded within the instrument, which provides digital read-out directly to a computer-plotter.

(iv) VLF transmitter - NLK (24.8KHz)(v) In-phase and quadrature both read facing north

Geophysics June 1996 Grid Grid size- 600 meters X 600 meters

line spacing = 100 meters Length base line = 600 meters Total length survey lines = 3,475 meters Spacing of readings: 1,200 meters of line read at 25

meter spacing and 2,275 meters of line read at 12.5 meter spacing

Survey equipment - EDM OMNI P LUS combined magnetometer and VLF detector as follows:

(i) total field magnetometer (sensitivity- 1y)(ii) base value - 59,OOOnT(iii) electonic correction for magnetic diurnal variation

made automatically at intervals of one minute and recorded within the instrument, which provides digital read-out directly to a computer-plotter.

(iv) VLF transmitter - NAA (24.0KHz)(v) In-phase and quadrature both read facing north

Three sets of maps have been drawn for each geophysical survey asfollows:

1. Diurnally corrected magnetic postings2. Profiles of magnetic readings3. Contoured magnetic readings4. VLF field postings for in-phase and quadrature5. Profiles of in-phase and quadrature readings6. Contoured Fraser-filtered VLF readings (VLF-FF)

Three sets of maps are presented here. One set shows the April Grid, another shows both the April and June Grids combined on one sheet, and a third shows the 1995 reconnaissance magnetometer survey.

Geochemistry June 1996 Grid

Five soil samples were collected on line 4+OOW of the June 1996 grid. Three samples were collected at about 20 meter spacing directly over the axis of the VLF anomaly. Two background samples were collected 40 meters farther north and 60 meters farther south, as shown on the accompanying VLF-FF contour map.

April Grid coordinates and analytical results for these sampes are as follows:

From B. L. (meters)

1+OON0+60N0+37N0+15N0+75S

Copper (ppb)

39124718433

Zinc (PPb)^321011 1 c5

Cadmium (PPb)

JO-c10 c10 c10

13

Lead (PPb)^0^0^0^0^0

Profile of the MMI results (ppb metal) are shown on a separate diagram (p. 13) for survey line 4+OOW (see "Mobile Metal Ion (ppb) Anomaly 30-7AT Copies of the MMI analyses Certificates from XRAL Laboratories are included here on pages 14 8*. 1 5.

MMI sample collection method is particularly important because of the very low levels of metal concentration which are being sought. An outline of the method recommended by Linda Bloom of XRAL is included here on page 12.

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL EXPENDITURES:

1. Reconnaissance magnetometer survey (November 1995)Travel expenses to/from Toronto

X living expenses (@ 2007o direct cost) - S 86 Magnetometer rental (2 days @ S65) - S 130 Wages (2 days @ S150) - S 300Subtotal - S 516

2. Mag-VLF survey (April 1996)Field operator charges - S1,023 Mag-VLF equipment (3 days @ S100) - S 300 Map preparation by computer - S 370 Report preparation (1.5 days @ S300) - S 450

Subtotal - S2.143

3. Mag-VLF survey (June 1996)Field operator charges - S 712Mag-VLF equipment (3 days @ S100) - S 300Map preparation by computer - S 350Report preparation (1.5 days @ S300) - S 450Subtotal - S 1,812

4. Collection of MMI samples and supervision of geophysical survey (June 1996)

Travel expenses to/from Toronto8i l iving expenses at Sioux Lookout - S 797

Wages (2 days @ S150) - S 300 Analyses of MMI samples (5 x S19) S 95 Report preparation (0.5 days @ S300) - S 150Subtotal - S1.342

Grand total - S5.813

CONCLUSIONS SL RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. An undrilled mag-EM anomaly, which is favorably located with respect to an intermediate-basic volcanic rock contact, has been re-located.

2. It is recommended that this EM-anomaly be tested further by the MMI survey method.

3. A previously unknown mag-VLF anomaly has been detected north of the EM-anomaly. This VLF anomaly has been tested by one line of MMI soil geochemistry samples. Increased concentration of copper and zinc was found to coincide with the VLF-axis.

4. If increased concentrations of economically interesting metals are found to coincide with the re-located EM-anomaly, it is recommended that the anomaly be tested by trenching and/or drilling.

Submitted by

Lionel C. Kilburn, P.Eng., BSc, MSc, PhD May 9, 1997

8

ROAD ACCESS SYSTEMScale - 1'^ 4 miles

claims 1076664 Z 4016665

v j sf~r-ff^yttdit WT -' ? ixi-'"-! -J— —— ——l ^- //,1it.\J- ' /-~^," a /^.. ^--^ , To, L

Claim #1076664

CLAIM #1076664. Patricia Mining Division Claim map G-2882 (Mcilraith Twp.)

Relative positions of Selco 1978 and SRL 1995 a 1996 grids with respect to Claim #1076664

Scale 1" ^ 1 /4 mile

Position of secondary roads shown

Selco grid 1978

SRL grid April 1996

SRL grid November 1995

SRL grid June 1996

10,

Mobile Metal IonsA New Mineral Exploration Tool

hy AW. lUdnn, K.D. liim-ll, l .M. (.dy, A. 1.M. mn, M l \Tilrixti K . K. CJ.irdncr

( ,i'ix honmfry KcMMrrh (.'c/ilrc, W .Au-ilr.i/M.i/x/ VVtimlcc/i Ply., //d, W ,Aus(r,i)(,i

Partial extractions have a long history in geochemistry. Their use probably reached an hiatus in the 1970s when the transition to full sample digestion with rapid turn-around through large laboratories became the stand ard method for exploration analysis. At that time, detection limits stood at the low ppm level for most elements. Since then, the lower detection limits for most elements, particu larly those of economic interest, have de creased by three orders of magnitude, to the ppb level. This almost imperceptible 'revolu tion by stealth', while readily welcomed by most exploraiionists, has not been fully ex ploited. In addition to being able to carry out 'routine' geochemistry at lower levels, the new instrumentation has opened up new ave nues in the methods of selecting sample ma terial for analysis which will maximize the opportunity for detection of ore bodies. Partial extraction is one technique which has, and will continue to benefit from this revolution.

The aim of a partial digestion is to release some of the metal contained in a soil lo solu tion. Mobile metal ions arc those which arc released to solution from the use of very weak exlractanls - extraclants which deliberately do noi attack the substrate or matrix. A large per centage of mobile metal ions appears lo be derived from metal-containing ore-bodies,

of nitrogen atoms in diamond; . Processings, Royal Society of Loncfcrt, A v38l,p. 159-178.

Gnflin, W.L, Cousens, D.R.. Ryan, C.G., Sie, S.H. and Suicr, GF., ( 1989): Ni in chron* pyrope; a new geothermometer, Contributions lo Mineralogy and Petrology. V. 103, p 199-202.

Jacques, A.L, l liiggerty, S. E, Lucas, H. and Boxer, G. L, (19K9): Mineralogy and penology of the Argyle (AKI) lamproite pipe. Western Australia. inJ-L.Ross (cd ) Kimberlites and related rocks, volume l . fourth Inlemam'l Kimberiile Conf.. fain, 1986, p. 1531&9.

ftakins, D. And Newton, R.C. (1980): The compositions of coexisting pyroxenes and garnet in the system Ca"-MgO-A12O3-Si2O at 900-UlxrC and high pressure. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrolugy, v75,p291-300.

Schulze,DJ.(1994): abundance and distribution oflow-Ca garnet harzburgite* in the subcralonic lithosphere of southern Africa; in, Kimberliles, Related Rocks and Mamie Xenolith*, p 327-335.

Sobolev, N.V., (1977): Deep sealed inclusions in knnber- liies and the problem of the composition of the upper mantle; American Geophysical Union, 279 p.

Taylor, W R., Jaques, AL. and Kidd, M., (1990): Nitrogen- defeci aggregation characteristics of some Australian diamonds. Tune-temperature constraints on the source regions of pipe and alluvial diamonds; Ameri can Minfrulttgin v 75, p. 12SO-I3 10.

Woods, n S , ( l Wo): Plalelets and the inlrored absorption ot type la diamonds; Proceedings of the Ruyul Society ofUmJon, A v 407, p. 219-238.

Table 1 . Summary of Cose Histories Investigated by the MMI ProcessStyle

Base Metals Pb,

in, Cu (

AfrPdJ

Ni ( Cu, Pt, Pd)

Au (2 Ajp

Sub-economic

Cases

24

9

37

4

Range of Settings

VMS, Miss Valley, massive and

disseminated. Very high to low rainfall. Slum- ritt'ply buried.

Massive to disseminated komatiite Ni in uluamafid. All arid zone, some in

partly transported material.

Mainly Archean qi vein style, some

porphyry. Most in and iones, but

several in high rainfall areas. Must on

deeply weatlu-ied pruhlei, some v*i[h

extensive blu-erw.tjh ^i dune cover

Various setting fi. depths

MMI Oeoi hemislry

Very sharp ore element anomalies

directly above and/or up-dip.

3 failures

Two levels, one distinguishes U/m units, the other Ni within U/m unity

2 failures on disseminated NiMany with i 30 times background anomalies, sharper than conventional geo*.riemiii.ry - slvaip enough Lo provide direa drilling Uriels ( Wr* huk^ wuh -- l^/l A^ j[ tjiii level]S failures on lraiix)rted overburdenNo failures, i.e., no false anomalies

and caretul use of weak extractants and very low level chemical pre-concentration and analysis techniques can be used to obtain sig nificant and reliable element signals to enable the anomaly patterns to be enhanced, re solved, and interpreted for the detection of blind ore-bodies. While the exact mechanisms for release, transport, and 'fixation' of the metals arc, in our case, the subject ot spon sored research and confidential, the technique is ul considerable importance lo the cxplora lion industry, because of its apparent ability to operate in deeply-weathered terrain, and in some cases through considerable thicknesses of overburden. Some 7000 samples, involving over 50 000 analyses have now been subjected to the Mobile Metal Ion Process.

The Mobile Metal Ion P rocess (MMIj-.f

The following are the major steps in the process:

* evaluation of background inlormation, in eluding existing geochemical data.

* field inspection, program design and sam pling;

* digestion and extraction of meuls;* analysis and QC (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, Au,

Ag.Pt&PdXand,* interpretation, recommendations and re

port.A number of separate digestions is re

quired, because no unc digcslaiil is capable ol providing optimum extraction o! all nine mcl- als. Dtgcslanls, details ol winch mini remain proprietary, have been screened and selected for their ability to extract only the very weakly-attached (mobile) meuls. Extraciants used are mulli-componet mixtures of water soluble organic and inorganic chemicals. Fol lowing digestion and analysis, 'background' for each element is calculated to provide a 'Response Ratio' ut each sample point lor each element. All subsequent interpretation of dala is based upon application ol the appropri ate thresholds lo the Res|)onse Kalios.

MMI Response Ratios Over d Base Metals Deposit at 700 m Depth

JO

s,(ftc oD.i/iOJtt

200

150

100

50

r™ "f l — t— -t — i — f ~~ F—900W 650W

^U^^jljjji i-^

~n H Zn/250

i®!iliff

IMi

D cdEl PbLul Cu

p: 1 Location ofHB mineralization at\~\4- 700 m depth

— ™] rw

''''^'' TVTf

, ^j --T--"I~l........i---j -f — l - - r- -, -j..... ,,

500W 375W 150W metre*

MVPPWl" i" in ,ii.i,.WTO^pw^7;,e Gangue' No. 52'"

/l

Table 2. Ni Responses over Mineralized and Ferruginized Barren UltramaficSampleNP11

(975t iimiN)

NP15ffl75t ^ nniNi

SoilPale Red/Brownsandy dayStrongly ferrug.

red/brown soil

with ironstone

Over8.6 m @2.75"/., Ni

Barren Ultramafic

MMI Response3B600 ppb

75 x background

3000 ppb

b x background

Total Ni720 ppm

6 x background

BOO ppm

7 x background

Oso Hislory Results

Over 70 case history and working studies have been earned out using the MMI process in tour comments. Table l gives an indication of the range of situations covered, and the relative success achieved.

Two of these examples are examined here in detail. Figure l shows the MMI anom aly on a transect across strike of buried base metals mineralization.

In the above example, note that the zone of mineralization at a depth of 700 m, projects to surface at very closely the position of the very sharp, mulii-element MMI anomaly (the Response Ratio for Zn has been divided by 250 lo appear on the same scale).

The second example, is from Nepean nickel deposit nearCoolgardie, Western Aus tralia. The ore zone contains massive nickel sulphide, with sulphides of copper, lead, co balt and minor gold, platinum and palladium mineraliztion Several factors are of interest m this particular study. First, the nodular fer ruginous material lo the west of the mineral ized zone, which shows high nickel responses by conventional analytical procedures, does not have a high MMI response. This is shown in Table 2 .

This lahle highlights that two different MMI thresholds are appropriate in the case of nickel, one which distinguishes ultramafic rocks from rocks with lower Ni contents (e.g., mafics), and the second to distinguish poten- uall-mineralized areas within ultramafic se quences, from 'barren' ultramafic. The MMI response over Ni mineralization is, in this case, 75 times background, while the MMI response over barren ultramafic is 6-times background. The data in Table 2 also show that in this case conventional geochemistry fails to provide a distinction between the Ni content of the ferruginized soil over barren ultramafic, and the Ni content in soil over mineralization, whereas the MMI partial ex traction clearly does.

At Nepean, the MMI response for Ni is at a maximum over the ore zones, and deline ates several ore zones with remarkable accu racy. As noted in the case of other base metals, there is the coincidence of several anomalies from individual elements contained in the mineralizalion, principally Pd and Cu. In many cases, there is an associated, but later ally-displaced, weak Au-Ag anomaly over the basal contact of the ultramafic unit with mafic units in the sequence. Several other pre viously-undetected, prospective zones are in dicated by MMI Ni Response Ratios to the east of the mined zone, and to the east of a postulated fold axis (Kirkpatrick, 1985). They

may represent anomalies which are associated with a possible structural repeal of minerali zation.

Discussion

1) Summary of essential features of MMI anomalies:

* MMI anomalies exist, andean be used to detect buried mineralization;

* MMI anomalies are clearly different to conventional geochemical anomalies in their appearance, intensity and potential application to exploration;

* The mechanism of formation of MMI anomalies is almost certainly very differ ent from that responsible for the forma lion of normal m u 11 i -e le m e ut geochemical anomalies;

* Not all elements behave in exactly the same manner; and

* MMI anomalies are sometimes 'swamped' in areas of recent, rapid transport.

Some of the individual and relevant ob servations which lead us lo these conclusions are;

* MMI anomalies comprise only elements present in the mineralization in signifi cant amounts;

* Anomalies are sharp, and in most cases directly overlay and define the extent of the surface projection of buried primary mineralized zones;

* When primary mineralization is high grade, MMI anomalies are capable of penetrating significant thicknesses of overburden; and,

* The incidence ol false anomalies is very low compared to normal geochemical methods.

2) Relationship of MMI lo other par tial extraction geochemical methods:

One of the first reports of the 'geogas' phenomenon was by Malmquvist i Kristiaiis- son (19X4). In this report the primary gases detected were nitrogen, argon, oxygen, and methane over a massive sulphide deposit in Central Sweden. Subsequent variations of the technique utilized plastic collection strips and very sophisticated instrumentation to detect ultra-trace levels of metal ions on the collec tors. Compared to other techniques, sample collection is not as robust, and the technique is very expensive when applied on the scale required for exploration.

The CHIM, Ml'l- and TMGM methods developed in the USSR (Antropove ci al., 1992) during the I9SOs recently came under increasing scrutiny. The USGS recently pu bished their findings on this technique (Smith

et al., 1993). The CHIM method (clearly very similar to the MMI technique, even to the use of carbon electrodes for pre-conceniration) and Gas Vapour Phase method (Magellan, 1993) are other methods of accessing metal ions from soils which differ from traditional partial extraction techniques. The traditional methods have, m many cases, used special extractanls to perform selective extraction-re lease of nietals from specific substrates These inelhods need lo ensure thai the cxtraclant does not dissolve an exessive amount of the substrate and release metal which contributes lo 'background noise'.

3) Possible mechanisms of formation of MMI anomalies

The Geochemical Research Centre (GRC) at Technology Park, Bentley, W. Aus tralia, operates a research program with the aim of providing participants with informa tion on the mechanism of formation of mobile metal ion anomalies. The Centre is currently considering mechanisms involving vapour (aerosol) transport and chemical release of metals during weathering. The elucidation of the mechanism isnol just concerned withthe mode ol transport, but also wiih me form o! tixation ol ihe metals in the soil regime. For ihib, the Centre is utilizing study areas pro vided by participating companies to examine tlie effects of different regolith, mineralogical, climatic and geomorphological situations on the presence, strength and persistence of anomalies.

Conclusions

Due lo tile increasing need for explora tion techniques lo operate effectively in areas ol deeply weathered or transported overbur den, this new geochemical technique has the potential to complement geophysical methods for the detection o! blind mineralization. Be cause of the very sharp and coincident nature ol tlie anomaly peak, it has the potential to significantly reduce drilling costs. As such the exploration budget will be affected by the in- troduclion of the technique into the explora tion program, in some cases by reductions of up to 30 - 50'^. Any partial digestion process is dependent on the correct, systematic and careful execution of a number of steps, that these methods cannot be easily translated lo a rapid/routine analytical technique As such, partial exlraclions will remain relatively ex pensive compared lo routine analysis, and they must be implemented into exploration programs with due diligence and care. An other word of cuulion is also required; Lhcrc is often a tendency, alter the initial scepticism has abated, to regard any new geochemical technique as a universal panacea, and in some cases lo misapply it. The MMI technique will be no different. There is a practical limit to its usefulness, which is dependant upon future developments in analytical techniques and ex tractanls. However, if carefully applied in an integrated and systematic manner, it seems certain to make a large contribution to the detection of buried mineralization.

A( knowU'dnu'nls

The work described in this paper in cludes any carried out under the auspices of

May 1996 '

MOBILE METAL ION SURVEY - SAMPLE COLLECTION METHOD

Equipment-1. 40cm diameter plastic garden sieve with minus 5mm

apertures (available at hardware stores) to classify sample

2. steel (not painted) garden spade to collect sample3. plastic wash dish to catch sieved product4. kitchen floor brush to clean sieve 81 dish between samples

Sample specification-500 gram sample stored in 90cm X 150cm plastic snap seal

sample bag

Sample site-Should be undisturbed and preferably a few meters from any

major contamination or drilling lines. Windborne contamination can be avoided during sample collection by sampling just below the surface.

Sample collection-In undisturbed environments, samples are collected

approximately 50-100mm below surface. The surface soil layer is scraped away eliminating organic matter and debris, and soil sample material is collected and sieved.

If there is a potential contamination problem, samples should be collected at a depth so as to avoid any contaminated material and the sampler's judgement must be relied upon. Damp samples do not cause any indue complications as long as there is no serious cross-contamination from sample collection.

LCK/June 4, 1996

12.

Mobile Metal Ion (cob} Anomaly 30-7A

200 -

180 -

160 - —

140 4-

N 1 2 0 -

Sg 100 -m8: so ~

60 4-l

40 -

20 -

0 - ; l——— — — \ — — — i — K —O

2+OON ^

r^^"Z.0CO

0

1

Solid columns- ppb copper

Open columns- ppb zinc

i i H — i i_ i i i ' i4. ~z. wr- m inCO T— h^

oo o 2+OOSLine 4+OOW (2+OON to 2+OOS) in increments of 12.5 meters

XRALPAKE L li l

25-JUL-96 REPORT 7804 WORKORDKR 9136-

SAWLK CU PPB

ICP

ZM PPB

ICP

CD PPB

ICP

PB PPB

ICP

4N-0+37M/APR.GRID 4M-0+60N/APR.GRID 4W- 0+15M/APR. GRID 412W-17+OOS 412N-16+50S

412W-16+75S l L9W-13+75S

•^ L9W-14+OOS

D 411-0+3711/APR.aiID

47

12~—^

48

ae37

46B)

47

32

1120

48

•CIO

•CIO<20

^0 <20

22i20

D - QUALITY CONTROL DUPLICATE

t Ot tho SG5 l 4 . oaiiMi G6iifcr.ik; (l(; Scirvoillancc:)

XRAL XRAL LaboratoriesA Division of SGS Canada Inc.

1886 Leslie Street Don Mills, Ont Canada M3B 3J4 Telephone (416) 445-5755 Fax (416) 445-4152

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

REPORT 7804

TO: STOARTOMC/O L.C. KILBURN 178 SHAMLEY OAKVILLE, ONTARIO

CUSTOMER No.

DATE SUBMITTED 8-Jul-96

3083

WORKORDER 9136- TOTAL PAGES l

9 SOILS

CD PPB ZN PPB CD PPB PB PPB

METHOD DETECTIONLIMIT

ICP 5. ICP 5. ICP 10. ICP 20.

METHOD CODE

*** UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE WE WILL DISCARD PULPS IN 90 DA'.'S *' AND RBECTS IN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF- THIS REPORT

ATE 25-JUL-96 CERTIFIED

Mombur Of Iho SGS Group (Soc.it-k'i G6n6r;iU; (K) Survoillunu:)

XRAL 08-AUG-96 REPORT 8027

PAGE l of l

WORKORDER 9479-

SAMPLB

/L10W-16+OOS

'. L8W-15+60S\L12W-18*50S

y L4W-1+OOH

1 L4W-0+75S

f PL+9+OOS

\ PL+11+OOS"S PL+12+OOS

^PL+14+OOS (100' SOUTH

XGOODIB-600

J 25002800•*^

45005500

D LlOW-16-t-OOS

CU PPB MISC

MMI-A

69414139

33

124

98

O73

52

37

25475455

ZN PPB MISC

MMI-A

145

73999^^

258

1868

150

99

9

^488322142

CD PPB MISC

MMI-A

•ao52

•CIO•OO

13

•ao•ao•ao-aoC15 )•ao<10

22<10<10

PB PPBMISC

MMI-A

^0

^0

<20 v<20 *v

^0<20<20<20<20

^0<20<20<20<20

D - QUALITY CONTROL DUPLICATE

rMember of the SG! , x idi6 Generale de Surveillance)

l 5.

XRAL XRAL LaboratoriesA Division of SGS Canada Inc.

1885 Leslie Street Don Mills, Ont Canada MSB 3J4 Telephone (416) 445-5755 Fax (416) 445-4152

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REPORT 8027

TO: STUARTON RESOURCES LIMITED C/O L.C. KILBURN 178 SHANLEY OAKVILLE, ONTARIO L6K 2B6

CUSTOMER No.

DATE SUBMITTED 22-Jul-96

3083

WORKORDER 9479- TOTAL PAGES l

14 SOILS

CD PPB ZN PPB CD PPB PB PPB

METHOD

MISC MISC MISC MISC

DETECTION LIMIT

5. 5.

10. 20.

METHODCODE

MMI-A MMI-A MMI-A MMI-A

*** UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE WE WILL DISCARD PULPS IN 90 DAYS *** AND REJECTS IN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS REPORT

fATE 08-AUG-96 CERTIFIED BY '/y \ s '-i \l i t

Dr. Hugh de Sou/j. General Manager

Member of the SGS Group (Societe Generate de Surveillance)

900' to road along blazed line

.J

Stuarton Resources Limited Reconnaissance Magnetometer Survey Anomaly 30-7A - Claim #1076664 Mcilraith Twp.. Patricia DistrictTotal Field Contoured(contour interval-I.OOOy)

Scale - 1:4,800 (scale - 1'^ 400') Magnetic declination - O 0 Base line azimuth - 550 (2350) Grid established by pace and compass

and flagged with orange tape Survey dates: November 23-24, 1995

Instrument: UNIMAG Sensitivity: ±10yBase value = 58,000y must hft addfifl tQ—-

all postin jft E C E \ \

03 N - f/iO—i (O(D Q.o- - - n ey03 3g * - l/ioo. 5

-l /V-0

cJ/220 square blazed tree

u-v 9 1

/fieo-ST^^ 2000I//00

mo-IfBO- I2&- /Z9o±

s^ik muskeg swamp

.iD&o

•M/


Stuarton Resources Limited Reconnaissance Magnetometer Survey Anomaly 30-7A - Claim #1076664 Mcilraith Twp.. Patricia District

Total Field Postings

Scale - 1:4,800 (scale - 1^ 400') Magnetic declination - O 0 Base line azimuth - 550 (2350 ) Grid established by pace and compass

and flagged with orange tape Survey dates: November 23-24, 1995

Instrument: UNIMAG Sensitivity: ±10y Base value = 58,000y must

all postin

B^\

WJD

SCD*

CT0)N

^*-* (DCD

030) NCDQ.— .3"

CD3O^

o3

1--

/fiO

llfO

H it lo-~

-

----

1I~Q//501130/l?0J/oa/o?o

l&to

^ *"s #J__l l

v 0o1

3/90-1 J 280 i

square blazed tree1150

ZSSO/880-\l4-*0

i

19H7

MINING LANDS BRANCH

1380-1360

I7JO-

muskeg swamp


Stuarton Resources Limited Reconnaissance Magnetometer Survey Anomaly 30-7A - Claim #1076664 Mcilraith Twp.. Patricia District

Total Field Profiles

Scale - 1:4,800 (scale - 1^ 400') Magnetic declination - O0 Base line azimuth - 550 (2350) Grid established by pace and compUss

and flagged with orange tape Survey dates: .November 23-24, 1995

Instrument: UNIMAG Sensitivity: ±10yBase value = 58,000y must be added to

all postings

w OD lQ) ^ -l

O) *

CT — -O) N (D Q.

H 2.0•no H lo

11-50

/OfO

1256 '

E l /220- square blazed treen-so

ECEIVE

MAY 2 1 19P7

MINING LANDS BRANCH

muskeg swamp

O O

o-

o o

400W i

300W 200W i

100W 100E

From B.L. (meters)

4-OOW 300W 200W 100W 100E

o o

-O

8(A

LEGEND

Mobile Metal Ion Surve

-sample location

2. l 730 550

40

. 30

20

10

O

FRASER

E C E I V E D

MAY 2 l 1997

LANDS BRANCH

25

IN-PHASE

Scale 1:250025 50 75 100 125 ——-^^

(meters)

150 175

STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID

DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO

VLF-ELECTRO MAGNETIC

FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE DATABowdidqe May 1996

400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100Ei i i i i

/fr

'

--z.0.o

0-

8-r~

98

94

104

-11

22

•63

76

-299 —— — —

480

124

-115

85 .

76

78

135 i

92

106

^39

33

41

123

-f? —— ———

189

168

1 VIItAI

-151

156

64

10

155*

109

106

-181

59

15

52

88

150

' -441

-615

189

90

43

186 i

167

84

-80

38

•-10

•34

-43? —————

•110

90

RBbo

•382

210

59

22 J

127

113

85

-5

13

•53

56

-64 ——————

227

165

t"JC176

-94

56

29

-21

120 i

97

100

-47

34

37

49

-53 ——————

29

63

4 ae1OO

--95

52

79

30 .

175

109

95

-105

84

68

46

16

107

ne30

-7

30

24

-1

150

110

64

-61

50

40

44

•41 —— —— ——

31

-9

anOZ

-69

-2

-18

-29

148

118

60

-49

45

12

37

nn

35

44

-85

65

29

19

149 T

127

104

-76

55

34

-6

-26 ——————

26

32

58

•114

92

44

-2

153 i

133

114

-82

69

49

16

-8

-25

-44

-57

47

45

13

143 f *

131 rf

115

•92 -8-z.

74

57

61

•17 -0

-0

-13

-24

-15 -8(/J

10

-434

-308

1 1 1400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100E

/l f******************************

7 L EGEND

/ Instrument: EDA Omni Plus\ Operator: D. Dmitrovic

Posting: Total field in nTBase Value: 59,000 nT

Correction: Base station

--"~" s ^~'? ^ ^ ^^ * -*- * ^

R E C E rv/ E r

: MAY 2 l 1 997

Scale 1:2500 MINING LANDS ORANC25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175

(meters)



MAGNETOMETER SURVEY.

TOTAL FIELD POSTINGSBowdidqe May 1996

400Wi

300W 200W i i

100W l

ol

100E

o-

8-

•8

LEGEND *******************************

Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovic

Profile: Total field in nTBase Value: 59,000 nT

Profile Scale: 1 cm s 200 nTPositive Direction: RightCorrection: Base station

^ O -; } *-'

-O

Scale 1:25

RECE

MAY 2 l

t

JOINING LAND? 2RANCK25

•800

25 50 75 100 125 150 1755555555 (meters)

l 400W 300W 200W 100W

i O 100E



MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

TOTAL FIELD PROFILESBowdidQe May 1996

400W

o. o

o-

too o

300W i

200W 100W i

100E

400W 300W 2QOW 100Wi

100E

-O

8

LEGEND *******************************Instrument: EDA Omni Plus

Operator: D . DmitrovicContours: Total field in nT

Contour Intervals: 10, 50, 250 nTCorrection: Base station

59150

59100

59O50

59000

58950

TOTAL IN

ECEriELD|T MAY 2 l ' 997

MINING LAND0 ^

25 OScale 1:2500

25 5O 75 100 125 150 P—______

(meters)

175



MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

TOTAL FIELD CONTOURSBowdidqe May 1996

400W 300W 200W 100W

O-o

00o o

100Ei

400Wi

300Wi

200W 100W 100E

LEGEND

Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovfc

Transmitter: NLK (24.8 KHz)Fitter Interval: 12.5 metres

Contour Intervals: 10, 50 units

8 2. l 73 c;c-50

-OECEIVED

AY 2 l 1997

MINING LANDS BRANCH

FRASER FILTER IN-PHASE

25Scale 1:2500

25 50 75 1QQ 125—

(meters)

150 175

t/)



VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC

FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE DATABowdidge May 1996

.•3

o. o

o-

t/18-

400W i

300W i

200W 100W i

Ol

100E i

400Wi

300W

\1

200W

:I

i100W

lo 100E

•8

-o

-8on

LEGEND

Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovfc

Transmitter: NLK (24.8 KHz)In-phase: Solid Line

Quadrature: Dotted LineProfile Scale: 1 cm =

Positive Direction: LeftFacing Direction: North

R E C E l V E L

MAY 21 1997

MINING LANDS BRANCJ1

25Scale 1:2500

25 50 75 100 125m—OSSSZ(meters)

150 175



VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC

IN-PHASE AND QUADRATURE PROFILESBowdidge May 1996

400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100E Ji i i i i X/ *******************************

7 L EGEND\ 7 *******************************

/ft/ Instrument: EDA Omni Plus22-

15-

6-

"Z.

0 - -1-O '

-16-

-4-

10-

0- 2-

-18

-21

-23

CO 8- -22-T—*

-20

-19-

-15 J

-15 24-,

-16 27-

-14 26-

-14 7-

-14 -11

-6 -2

0 29-

-3 ———— 36-

-5 9

•-5 -12-

0 -16

•3 -19-

6 -19 J

7 -18

8 -17-

-13 23 1

-12 33-

-8 41

-18 30-

-20 12

-11 -3

-0 9

f -rrr

-5 21

-10 2

-7 -9

-7 -15-

-2 -20

-2 -18

3 -14

-16 19

-13 18

-6 3!

-9 31-

-17 25

-16 16

-6 12

rt AC

1 42

-3 28

-8 14

-6 5-

-5 10

1 -2

4 -7

-15 16-

-16 19-

-11 25-

-9 34-

-12 23-

-13 19-

-12 20-

-S ———— 26-

5 31-

0 33

-4 22

-8 20-

-2 16

-1 9-

0 5

•-19 16-1

-17 17-

--13 17

-11 12-

-13 9

-10 6

-8 8

-6 ————— 8-

•-4 11-

-5 11

-B 10

-4 18-

•-1 17

•0 14

•4 9

-16 10

-15 11

-15 9

-13 9-

-1B 8

-14 6

-11 3

-9 ————— 2-

-7 1

-5 0

-5 7

-8 10-

-7 9

-5 10

-2 7

-16 9

-16 9

•-15 10

-13 5-

-12 2

-12 2

-9 1

•-5 -2

•-5 -4

-5 -2

-6 8-

-5 9

-0 7

0 7

-13 5-

-14 6-

-13 5-

-14 3-

•-13 2

-11 -2

-10 -4

-8 ————— 6-

-5 -6

-6 -4'

-5 . -3

-5 2-

-5 8

-4 4

-0 2

-14 5-

-13 5-

-13 4

-11 3-

-9 4

-8 2

-6 -2

-4 ————— \-

-2 -6 -

-1 -6

-2 -4

-4 1-

-1 6

0 4

3 1

-10 4i

-13 6-

-12 4

-13 2-

-10 2

-7 5

-7 1

-6 ————— 1-

-4 -3

-2 -5

-3 -7

-3 -6-

-1 -1

-1 0

3 -1

-13 4i

-13 6

-14 5

--13 5-

-10 6

-7 6

-7 8

V v

-4 4

-2 3

0 1

-1 -2-

1 -4

4 -3

•7 -2

,8 /V \ Operator: D. Dmitrovic / ^ Transmitter: NLK (24.8 KHz)

J I n-phase: Left of Line-9 rf Quadrature: Right of Line

Facing Direction: North*******************************

-13

-1Z

-11

"9 , ^ t

ft ,-- Vi ® ^"^ i 1 —Q ,.' ~ p -'. gt i"

-6 -0

-4

-4

*p

^R^cTrvTc"!M AY 2 11997 |

^N^GJ^NDS.BRA^ .

Scale 1:250025 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175

-i - SCO

•-o

â—nii^âMiMMiâ (meters)


L 6 DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO

VLF-ELECTROMAGNETICi i i400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100E .

IN-PHASE AND QUADRATURE POSTINGSBowdidqe May 1996

Ontario Ministry olNorthern Developmentand Mines

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990

ransaction Number (office use)

Assessment Files Research Imaging

Personal info Mining Act, th Questions at 933 Ramsay

5(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the ssment work and correspond with the mining land holder, istry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor.

52K02SEOOO1 2.17305 MCILRAITH 900Instructions: - r-or work performed on Crown Lands before re

- Please type or print in ink.cording a clOi, use|orrrMR?4@i.

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name Client Number

Address Telephone NumberDS -OLFax Number

Name Client Number

Address Telephone Number

Fax N-jmber

2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs) D Physical: drilling, stripping,

trenching and associated assays | | Rehabilitation

Work Type f Office Use

Commodity

Total S Value of Work Claimed

s f* * 5 C 1 J

Dates Work Performed

.. FromDay Month Day

*1

Month YearNTS Reference

Global Positioning System Data (if available) Townsiip/Area

M or G-Plan Number

Mining Division fo.*friVi

C-288Z Resident Geologist, District

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;-- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212; l MAY 9 l- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked fcf assignrng work;1997- include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name Telephone Number

Address Fax Number

Name Telephone Number

Address Fax Number

Name Telephone Number

Address Fax Number

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent

V— ' - ^TV-I ^Q nereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(Print Name)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent

Agent's Address\G

Telephone Number, Fax Number

5. Work to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to the mining land where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link must accompany this form.

Mining Claim Number. O r ifwork was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.

Value of work applied to this claim.

Value of work assigned to other mining claims.

Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date.

l, la hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under(Print Full Name)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Authorized in Writing Date

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( s ) i n the boxes below to show howyou wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

D 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated. d 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you follov

JridH&ated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, number 2 if necessary.

Deemed Approved Date

(3Date Approved

Date Notification Sent

Total Value of Credit Approved

Approved for Recording byJRidTna^ecorder (Signature)

Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Numbw (oflics UM)

Personal information collected on this lorm is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) at the Assessment Worfc Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the Information Is a public record. This information will be used to revieVrJbe asse^tmerf rwaxl^nd correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recc#d*r, Ministry of NqfthqrrvDe/veJopmem and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6B5. "~ 'J v—'f " ^,.

Work TypeUnits of Work

Depending on the type ol work, list the number ot hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres of grid line, number of samples, etc.

Cost Per Unit Total Cost

"X

f I5o

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

Transportation Costs

? Food and Lodging Costs

^r

Total Value of

Calculations of Filing Discounts:

QfW^r iflyWork filed within two years of performance is claimed at 100(M) of the a

l&fEmGitE'rJriV E

MAY 2 l 1997

.MiNifeiG.LAfNpsBPANCH . ,... .be'i'e ToTorvoFuo of Aooeooi tent Work.. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 5096 of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. H this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 - Total S value of worked claimed.

Note: JJ- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit. ~~'- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45^iys of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification Is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted. ~J- ' ' ~o

Certification verifying costs:

, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may(pleas* print full name)

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

the accompanying Declaration of Work form as

to make this certification.

WV Woufttlb Utj(recorded holder, tgenl, ot slale company poslon with signing authority)

am authorized

Signature Dale

CD

m i\Po.

l fs

^'- - - J

\

,cr.:

\OlWiyo *rPROJECTED LINE

Webb Twp.

TRIM LINE

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

July 22, 1997

Sharon Kemash Mining Recorder Queen and Fourth P.O. Box 3000 Sioux Lookout, ON P8T1C6

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Submission Number: 2 .17305

StatusW9730.00196 Deemed Approval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

NOTE: This correspondence may affect the status of your mining lands. Please contact the Mining Recorder to determine the available options and the status of your claims.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 11090

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .17305

Date Correspondence Sent: July 22,1997 AssessorLucille Jerome

Transaction NumberW9730.00196

First Claim Number1076664

Township(s) l Area(s)MCILRAITH

StatusDeemed Approval

Section:13 Geochemical GCHEM14 Geophysical MAG 14 Geophysical VLF

Approval Date

July 21, 1997

Correspondence to:Mining Recorder Sioux Lookout, ON

Resident Geologist Sioux Lookout, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Lionel C. KilburnSTUARTON RESOURCES LTD.OAKVILLE, ON

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 11090

Form 12

Mining Act ,,, v . rt D o . 'j f i'in l l vi Pvl' 1-,

REPORT OF WORK CONDUCTED AFTER RECORDING CLAIMRecorded holder(s) Client No.Stuarton Resources Limited 301184 "ID lAddress Telephone No.178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville ON L6K 2H6 (905) ft45i-36'S{iC -iMining Division Township/area M or G Plan No.Patricia Mcilraith Twp. G2882Dates work performed From: N ovember 1995 To: July 1996

Work performed (check one work group only) Work Group Type:

X Geotechnical survey Geophysical- Magnetometer A VLF-EMGeochemical- Mobile Metal Ion

Physical work,including drilling

Rehabilitation Other authorized work Assays Assignment from reserve

Total assessment work claimed on the attached statement of cost S 5,

Persons and survey company who performed the work:

RECEIVED

^ MAY 21 ISb/(give name X address of author of report)

MINING LANDS BRANCH Name AddressDusan Dimitrovic 2592 Hammond Road, Mississauga ON K5K 1T2 Lionel C. Kilburn 178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville ON L6K 2H6

Certification of beneficial interest:

l certify that at the time the work was performed the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder. Date: cv\ p \c ^ Recorded holder or agent (signature):

Certification of work report:

l certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this work report, having performed the work or witnessed it during and/or after its completion, and the annexed report is true.

Name and address of person certifying

Telephone No. DateWtMfJtvf Certified by: L ionel C. Kilburn (905) 845-3650 ' '| (signature)

Work report number for applying reserve: n ot applicable

Claim number: 1 076664 Number of claim units: 1 6 Total number of claims: 1

Value of assessment work done on this claim: S 5 , 8 1 3Total value of work done: S 5 , 8 1 3Value applied to this claim: S 5 , B 1 3Total value of work applied: S 5 , 8 1 3

Value assigned from this claim: n i lTotal assigned: n i lReserve: Work to be claimed at a future date: n i lTotal reserve: n i l

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark ( ) one of the following:

1. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.——2. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this work report. __3. Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix. ——

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option 1 will be implemented

If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following: l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

N/A N/A

signed Date

O. Reg. 111/91. Form 12

TRIM LINE

-P'J 24/96 REG

REFERENCESAREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY

S.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

M.+ S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

Description Order No. Date Disposition Filefff\ S .R.O. 163474

W 38/8? 28/5/82 S R. A M.R 194075

SAND AND GRAVEL

GRAVEL FI37297

MNR GRAVEL PIT N? 61 FILE 137297

GRAVEL V -'l FII8323

GRAVEL N 32 FI18323

M fl.R GRAVEL PIT IA-39

Route Lake Ar Whipper Lake Areai Taggart iC ^ T- l

FORMERLY SUN STRUM INTERMEDIATE

AERODROME

RETURNED TO PROVINCE

O. C. 24/8760

00

^CLB:h-

Q.13 O

CD^-

GO

-i-Q/6663 ysl

LCr\

C OE o

Webb Twp. t-w B b

LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADS TRAILS SURVEYED LINES:

TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC.LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINES.LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -t

UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT

i * i

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL

PATENT. SURFACE 81 MINING RIGHTS-_............^. 9.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY._____........._... O, MINING RIGHTS ONLY ___..___......._. O

LEASE, SURFACE i MINING RIGHTS—————.-— B" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY._...................... B" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY..._._.__........__. B

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .._....___ ................. TORDER IN COUNCIL ———._......^._———.——. OCRESERVATION ___......___.............,.........™.. ©

CANCELLED ___.......___——.....-,............... ®SAND 8. GRAVEL ___....___......,._——...—,,.. ©

NOTE: M INING RIGHTS I N PARCELS PATENTED P RIOR TO MAY 6. 1913. V ESTED IN O RIGINAL P ATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R.S.O 1970. CHAP. 380. SEC. 63. SUBSEC 1.

SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS

FEETO 10OO 2OOO 4OOO 6000 80OO

O 200 METRES

1OOO(1 KM)

2000(2 KM)

TOWNSHIP

MCILRAITHM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

DRYDENMINING DIVISION

PATRICIA LAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

KENORA

Ministryof LandNatural Management

Resources BranchOntario

MAY 1985 Number

THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER. MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES. FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON

2.1730

l

O

H

H

L. o

5

00 LO

TRIM LINE

52K02SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH 200

OJs ro8 g S

APRIL 1996 BASELINE

*******************************LEGEND

*******************************Instrument: EDA Omni Plus

Operator: D. DmitrovicTransmitter:

South Grid - NAA (24.0 KHz)North Grid - NLK (24.8 KHz)Filter Interval: 12.5 metres

Contour Intervals: 10, 50 units

FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE UNITS

JUNE 1996 BASELINE" l 73 r-

50Scale 1:2500

O 50 100 150

fmeters)

52K02SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH 210

STUARTON RESOURCES LTD,MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID


VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY***

FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE DATABowdfdge August 1996

M

3S

IS}

8

JUNE 1996 BASEUNE '

50

*******************************

LEGEND*******************************

Instrument: EDA Omni Plus Operator: D. Dmltrovlc

Transmitter:South Grid - NAA (24.0 KHz) North Grid - NLK (24.8 KHz)

In-phase: Solid LineQuadrature: Dotted Line

Profile Scale: 1 cm = 2525Positive Direction: LeftFacing Direction: North

Scale 1:2500O 50 100

52KQ2SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH

150

220



VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY***

IN-PHASE AND QUADRATURE PROFILESBowdtdge August 1996

i— i—i— r-(—i— r- r- (— p-

sg se sg sg sg 36 sg sg ' sg o m m

22i

15

6

-1-

-16

-4

10

f.

-18

-21

-23

-22-

-20

-19

-15

-15 24

-16 27

-14 26

-14 7-

-14 -11

-6 -2

0 29

-5 9

-5 -12

0 -16

-3 -19-

6 -19

7 -18

8 -17

-13 23

-12 33

-8 41

-18 30-

-20 12

-11 -3

-0 9

-5 21

-10 2

-7 -9

-7 -15-

-2 -20

-2 -18

3 -is- y-12

-10

-10

-11--11

-12-13

-15

-13

-20

-11-

JUNE 1996 BASELINE -7--0

811

8

2-2

-5

-6-

-7--9'

-9

-8-7-5

-5

r -16 19 -i

-13 18

-6 31

-9 31-

-17 25

-16 16

-6 12

1 42

-3 28

-8 14

-6 5-

-5 10

1 -2

4 -7

-15 16-

-16 19

-11 25

-9 34-

-12 23

-13 19

"12 20-

17

5 17

0 19

-416-

-811

-27

-1 3

0 1-

10 -3

11 -3

15 -5

•17 -6-19

18 -9

18 -13

19 -14

16 -17

15 -21

7 -15-\ —————————————— 9-

-5 -3

-9 -3-23 12

-23 16-21 17

-17 21

-13 16

—10 7-

-8 3

-5 0

-3 -2-1 -4

1 -50 -4

2 -4

2Q -3

in-4

31 '-5

33-4

22-2

2Q-0

162

9. 6

5 •7

-19 16

-17 17

-13 17

-11 12-

-13 9

-10 6

-8 8

-

-4 11

-5 11

-8 10

-4 18-

-1 17

0 14

4 9

-16 10

-15 11

-15 9

-16 9-

-16 8

-14 6

-11 ~21

-1

~7 .4

-5 .4

-51-

--86

6

•* 4

'~2 3-

11 2

•13 1

13 -1

•15 -8--11

18 -13

18 -15

17 -17-

15 -16

14 -167 .14 .? |C(~ lw

2 -6

0 -10

-6 5

-11 16-17 11

-22 6

-24 1

—20 1-

-15 1

-12 -0

-8 -3 -5 -5

-3 -5

-1 -60 -5

J -8

•t

-9

1 -7

0-6

7-5

10-4

9-3

10

7 •1

-16 9

-16 9

-15 10

-13 5-

-12 2

-12 2

-9 1

-5 -2

-5 -4

-5 -2

-6 8-

-5 9

-0 7

0 7

-13 5-

-14 6

-13 5

-14 3-

-13 2

-11 -2

" 10 "?1

^ -6

-5 -7

~6 -fi0

-5 ,-5-

-1

-5 ,o

~4 4

-0 2-

4 0

6 0

12 3

•14 0-

14 -316 -5

17 -717 -9

15 -14

11 -20

13 -15-6 ————————————— tt-

-3 -10

8 -10

1 -9

-4 -8-9 -5

-9 -5

-8 -3

-8 1-

-7 3-7 3

-7 1 -5 -2

-3 -5-2 -6

-1 -6

-4

JL

-4-6

-2-4

-2-3

-2

2-2

8-1

4

D2

-1

-14 5

-13 5

-13 4

-11 3-

-9 4

-8 2

-6 -2

-2 -6

-1 -6

-2 -4

-4 1-

-1 6

0 4

3 1

-10 4i

-13 6

-12 4

-13 2-

-10 2

-7 5

-7 1

-4 -3

-2 -5

-3 -7

-3 -6-

-1 -1

-1 0-

3 -T-7

4 -10-11-

6 -12-11-

8 -7-2

•9 1-

9 310 B

12 8

14 5

17 2

15 -2

9 -7-5 ———————————— t^-

1 -13

1 -15-3 -12

-4 -8 '-4 -2

-7 3

-9 9

—11 8-

-10 10-10 9

-10 4 -9 ^-O J

-7 1-7 0-5 -1

-13 4

-13 6

-14 5

-13 5-

-10 6-

-7 6

-7 8

-4 4

-2 3

0 1

-1 -2-

1 -4

4 -3

7 -2

-8

-9 f

\ 7

-13 /ft/yv *.

-li 7 ^y/

J

-11 ^^

^

-9

-6

-4

-4

-5

-1

-0i— f"

2 o ^ 0 mm

6 -7- -9 -5- -3

10 '

9 -9

9

10 -15

10

9 -18

7 -17

•3 -12-

2 03 10

3 125 13

6 129 9

12 514 'IT */

14 1

12 -1

7 -3

0 -6-6 -8

-10 -11

-12 -14

-15 -18-

-14 -24

-16 -24

-17 -18 -18 -5

-15 6

-13 10-12 6

-3- -2 -3-M -5-M -e1^ -4-L-11 4-

0r~ i— r- .r— r—

12 -5

13 -5

11 -77

-4 -9--0 -10-5 -7

-5 -4

-3 -2

-3 -10 -1

3 -26 A

t.

9 -2

•12 -1r 14 -1

15 -216 -3

18 -520 -8

-19 -11-

r 14- -14

•10 -17

2 -20 -4 -17

-13 -8•-16 6

-20 7

-18 7--17 16

oj NJ — o — -l 1 -15 18 o S 8 8 13* sg sg m 6 J

5

7

10

•10

9

8

6

5

44 #^

4-5

5

89

1214

15

16-17

17

16

13

15

5-7

-9-12

-13

-15 , -17 '-17

*******************************LEGEND


Transmitter:South Grid - NAA (24.0 KHz)North Grid - NLK (24.8 KHz)

In-phase: Left of LineQuadrature: Right of Line

Facing Direction: North

Note: where north and southgrid lines adjoin, in— phase

postings for north grid havebeen moved up, and quadrature

povttngs fer soutk grid hum *- -^been moved down, to avoid

overlapping numbers. *******************************

-- : ,-s i -- - *" ' :

: '4' 3 ^ '

"-. . ! " -

--- - **~ ** . - -.,,

Scale 1:250050 0 50 100 150

(meters)

lllUlMiKlffillllllUNVilUllfflNNIIillllHfilllUiiUUiiliHffiUfillilllliHNllV111 li IHI 1 HI ill! 11 ID 111 li UN lil 11 11 111 HI (HI 1H III52K02SE0001 2. 17305 MCILRAITH 230



VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY***N-PHASE AND QUADRATURE POSTINGS

Bowdidge August 1996

98

94

104

-11

22

63

76

-269 —————

480

124

132

-115

85

76

78

135

92

106

-39

33

•41

123

-W — — ——

189

168

150

-151

156

64

110 *1

42

43

69

152-

235312

402

531

7611031

1522

JUNE 1996 BASELINE 2150-2215

17661124

808573

443398 406-

430429-

411-

396

385378

378386-

155

•109

106

-181

59

15

52

-W — — ——

88

150

L -441

-615

189

-90

-43

186

167

84

-60

38

-10

34 160-

4 OT-*27 — rr-206

110 123

on 90 110

66 98-

• 3K 98

210 y

so 59 -290

22 -46-

27

14

23

113l

258

393555

8791693

3189_______________________ •ffi-'T

3474-

25601600

40680

156243 268-

279

266

244

227

237257

281304-

127

113

85

-5

13

53

56

-84 ——————

227

165

176

-94

56

29

-21

120

97

100

-47

34

37

49 48-

-W ——————47 T

29 13l -J

6397

186 211-

-* 35-

52 26

79 'S 9

^ -11-

-40-

-44

-50-

-33-45-

225

5201227

22003631 -

4480————————————————— -IOIQ

3165

32123644

22181210

472237-

119-

142

152

163

156

142146160-

184-

r175

109

95

-105

84

68

46

-51 — —— ——

16

107

96

-7

30

•24

-1

150 -]

110

64

-61

50

40

44 46.

^ ——— 30"•AJ

31 39*Jj

-936

82 56-

'm 75

-2 47

- 18 33JvJ

-29 39-

4

4

52

10-

413

61140

257564

1519————————————— W69-

1721

1253807

602

867

619

315 103-

218

251

245

238

256277

292310-

148

118

60

-49

45

12

57

-22 — — — —

35

44

74

-85

65

29

19

149

127

104

-76

55

34

-IS ——————

26

32

58

-114

92

44

2 -31-24-35

-23

35155

338

288

1 1D-

2771

107114

110

111

120—————————————— f62-

247

440

656

754

736

852

1151 1238-

1018

760

564

510

h 480417

1- 355307-

153

133

114

-82

69

49

.3 ———————

-8

-25

-44

-57

47

-45

13

143

13j /* *******************************

xX LEGEND\^ A / *******************************

115 /Y/ I nstrument: EDA Omni Plusrv x. Operator: D. Dmitrovic

. 92 f \ Posting: Total field in nT 7 Base Value: 59,000 nT

s/ D iurnal Correction: Base station74 /f *********i).*******K.*******i(t*i|.***

57

-17 APRIL 1996 BASELINE

-0

-13

-24

-15

10 r- f~

-434 S i0 m m

-308 -23,

-47

-27

196460 700-

872855

918849

561

334

247f*nf—————————————— 226-

229

243260

289332

379

433 527-

677

936

1394

2080

248021281476946-

667"~ ^ ^ *~ ^ ^aOJ NJ ^ (O -^ 3O0

88-8 8

r ~7 "-35

-74

-89

5-

74147186-

175

11777-

41——————————————

48

62

79

113

149

198

254 330-

433

579

734967

14922361

3198

3731 -

r 3681

2922 1849

* * * m 1017

2.17305

Scale 1:250050 0 50 100 150

fmeters^

lllllllllllHllIIHnull mi limn HI inn linn mi in lin UHI mi IHU us nui niu HID nil m miS2K02SE0001 2 17305 MCILRAITH 240



MAGNETOMETER SURVEY***

TOTAL FIELD POSTINGSBowdidae August 1996

s 8 8 8 8

LEGEND


Contours: Total field in nTContour Intervals: 50, 250, 1000 nT

Diurnal Correction: Base station

60100

! i!!!!

TOTAL HELDIN nT ~-

JUNE 1996 BASELINE

50Scale 1:2500

o_____so_____100 150

(meters)

----

8



MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

TOTAL FIELD CONTOURSBowdidge August 1996

s

******************************* LEGEND

Insirument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovic

Profile: Total field in nTBase Value: 59,000 nT

Profile Scale: 1 cm = 200 nTPositive Direction: Right

Diurnal Correction: Base station

JUNE 1996 BASELINE

50Scale 1:2500

O 50 100 150

(meters)

STUARTON RESOURCES LTD. MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID


MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

TOTAL FIELD PROFILESBowdidge August 1996

claim #1076664 mcilraith township. patricia mining division

Documents