citytlds at gac at icann cairo 2008
DESCRIPTION
dotBERLIN presentation at Governmental Advisory Committee at ICANN Meeting Cairo 2008 by Dirk KrischenowskiTRANSCRIPT
cityTLDscity top-level domains
33th ICANN MeetingGovernmental Advisory Committee
Cairo, Nov 2nd 2008
Prepared by Dirk Krischenowski (Founder and CEO of the .berlin TLD)
cityTLD Initiatives today
Manageable Number of cityTLDs ahead
55 cities with more than 3 million inhabitants
381 cities with more than 1 million inhabitants
(4,050 cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants)
http://unstats.un.org (data from 1999-2001) http://www.unhabitat.orghttp://esa.un.org/unup/ (data from 2003)
A Challenge – One TLD for many Cities
Berlin (DE) – 500 inhabitants – founded anno 1215
Berlin (DE) – 3.4 mio inhabitants – founded anno 1237
~ 30 public authorities with the name Berlin worldwide from 100 to 20,000 inhabitants, founded after anno 1700
To be discussed
One cityTLDvs.
Many Cities with the same Name
General Remarks
As ccTLDs do for countries, cityTLDs will offer many benefits for the digital identity of cities and the Internet community at large
We agree with the GAC recommendations for cityTLDs
City City
.berlin and .hamburg = For all Berliners/Hamburgers worldwide
.paris = For the city and metropolitan area .bcn = For Barcelona .nyc = For New York City .quebec = For the city and/or province .pdx = For the greater city area
Dotberlin, dot berlin, dot hamburg, dothamburg, dotparis, dotparis, dotbcn, dot bcn, dotnyc, dot nyc, dotquebec, dot quebec, dotpdx
No „One solution fits all“ to cityTLD Issues
Different addressing: inner city suburban metropolitain region region
Different legal frameworks:private semi-private government
Different policies: open gTLD style community closed shop
cityTLD Issues
Case .berlin
The German legal Framework
Existing legal framework for TLDs
Direction of Top-Level Domains to the private sector self-regulated management
German government involved during all times, support/no-objection expressed
The .berlin Community
Open for participation by everybody since 2005, many community events
>100 community partners (associations, companies, individuals etc.) that represent city organisations, SMEs, tourism, culture, science, law, and citizens
Sharing the Name BERLIN
All public authorities with the name Berlin should be incorporated and respected for .berlin
We used any multiple communication channels (visit, letter, tel, fax, email and via embassies, CCIs, GAC etc.) to contact Berlin public authorities globally
Our offer: All Berliners worldwide will be able to register .berlin
Response so far: „No objections“
.berlin Internet Governance Model
User rights
Reserved Names
Monopoly
TechnicalFinance
Operation
Data Safety
Fair & transparent
Confusion
Our aim is to develop and define principles, norms and guidelines for best practice of the management of the .berlin name space
Trademarks
Security
…
…
…
Case .nyc
The US legal Framework
No legal framework for (g)TLDs, but potentially support/non-objection needed by the city
Connecting.nyc Inc. – A New York State not-for-profit corporation.
Corporate Governance Board of Directors – Individuals, Civil Society, Ex-Officio
Government seats, Business seats. Community Advisory Network
Sharing the Name NYC
Unique name for a unique city.
A „new“ global city – founded 1643.
No apparent collisions.
Laying a „Welcome Home“ mat for New York firms with pre .nyc domain names.
Case .paris
The French legal Framework
No legal framework for gTLDs in France
The City of Paris will take care – in partnership with other stakeholders – of the .paris
Sharing the Name PARIS
We think all authorities with the name Paris should be incorporated and respected for .paris
Paris (France) Mayor will use multiple communication channel to contact public authorities with the name Paris – in a first step the larger ones
Our offer: All people or organizations linked with Paris capital will be able to register Interested by Paris Paris lovers
Sharing the Name PARIS
Others Paris cities worldwide e.g.– www.ci.paris.tx.us– www.paristexas.com– http://ci.paris.il.us– www.parismo.net– www.parisky.org– www.paristnchamber.com
To propose and reach an agreement with those cities– Paris – Texas : tx.us.paris– Paris – Missouris : mo.us.paris
Summary
cityTLDs Issues - Summary
cityTLDs applicants should address the challenge of cities with the same name seriously and actively, regardless what the Applicant Guidebook states
There is no „One solution fits all“ to the issues raised by the cityTLDs
An individual multi-stakeholder approach with information, involvement, incorporation and agreement may lead individual but reasonable solutions