city to city lessons: for building protected bike lanes
Upload: project-for-public-spaces-amp-national-center-for-biking-and-walking
Post on 29-Nov-2014
27 views
DESCRIPTION
This presentation outlines lessons learned from building protected bike lanes in three very different cities: Seattle, Austin and Memphis. Speakers will deliver practical advice for cities from cities on design, funding, outreach, project management and communications. Presenters: Presenter: Zach Vanderkooy PeopleForBikes Co-Presenter: Chad Crager City of Austin, TX Co-Presenter: Kristen Simpson City of Seattle, WA Co-Presenter: Kyle Wagenschutz City of Memphis, TNTRANSCRIPT
Title of Presentation Date
City to City Lessons For Building Protected Bike Lanes
3 CITIES
3 QUESTIONS
WHAT MISTAKES?
WHAT HINDSIGHT?
WHAT WORKED?
MEET THE CITIES
CITY OF MEMPHIS,
TN
Population: 655,155
Area: 325 sq. mi.
Bike Mode Share: 0.30%
Bike Lanes: 58 miles
Protected Bike Lanes: 1.5 miles
Buffered Bike Lanes: 0.5 mile
Austin, TX
• Population: 842,500
– Area: 272 square miles
• Austin Metro Population: 1.9 Million
– Area: 4,285 square miles
Austin on a bicycle
• Total Bicycle Lanes: 210 miles
– Buffered Bicycle Lanes: 21
– Protected Bicycle Lanes: 2.5
• City Wide Mode Share: 2%
• Central City Mode Share: 5%
Seattle
Population = 650,000 Area = 91 square miles Bike mode share = 3.6% (2010)
13
“Riding a bicycle is a comfortable and integral part of daily life in Seattle for people of all ages and abilities.”
2014 Seattle Bicycle Master Plan
Goals: Safety Connectivity RIdership Equity Livability
WHAT WORKED WELL?
Community-Based Support for Each Project
• Provides city officials the necessary cover to move projects forward even if controversy exists
• Typically higher levels of public participation compared to traditional bike lane projects
• Engaged advocates, businesses, church/community leaders serve as spokespeople in public forums and in media to support these project
• Private fundraising helps to ease financial burden of city to fund all initiatives
Moving Projects Forward
With Pilot
Demonstrations
• Demonstrates a level of commitment towards implementation while still technically sorting through the details.
• Demonstrates a level of commitment towards implementation while still technically sorting through the details.
• Pilot projects help to engage new levels of participation in design process.
Institutionalizing Decisions that Lead to PBL Implementation
• Parks Division seeking solutions to trail connectivity problems utilizing PBL’s
• Storm Water group utilizing buffer zones as implementation of drainage solutions on selected routes
• State DOT implementing PBL projects when resurfacing state routes in Memphis
1. INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES THAT ARE FLEXIBLE
2. PROTECTED BIKE LANES WON’T SOLVE EVERYTHING, BUT THEY DO PROVIDE A PART OF THE SOLUTION
3. FAST AND CHEAP
Data Collection
Mix of High and Low
Safety Messaging and User Education
Safety for all users ◦ People biking – Support people of all ages and abilities ◦ People walking – Separate bicycles from pedestrians ◦ People driving – Provide predictability within the street
WHAT MISTAKES WERE MADE?
A Minimalist Approach to Separation on Early
PBL’s
• Too much treatment can be burdensome to maintenance efforts or aesthetically unappealing
• Too little separation allows for permeability of the buffer zone
• Erred on the side of being incremental in applying new treatments versus overloading the street with pavement marking and flexible posts
• Finding balance between too much an too little is difficult, but important to future implementation
First Project Not Highly Visible
• Even though ties to larger network vision, the phased implementation cast doubt on the efficacy of PBL’s
• Propagated conversations about the motives to install PBL’s when they weren't being used any more frequently than other bike lanes
• Easy to implement and test out new strategies, but little public pay-off in terms of use, mode-shift, etc.
Focusing on the Project, Not the Network
• Difficult to balance the need to take advantage of opportunities for implementation versus strategic implementation of network segments
• The demand to get projects on the ground can outpace the need to take time to develop a comprehensive vision for how PBL’s will work as a network
• Protection only eases concerns and allays fears as far as it exists. If either end of the route isn’t accessible, results can be limited
1. LACK OF PHYSICAL BARRIERS
2. COORDINATE WITH OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS
3. FOCUS ON NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
Creating a Network:
The 8 to 80 Test:
An 8 year old traveling with an 80 year old should be able to traverse the city
comfortable and safely.
Current Bicycle Planning Efforts: Urban Trails Master Plan and Bike Plan
Update 1998 2009
Bike Plan
Update
2014
Urban Trails Plan
Benefits of Short Term Network Significant Mobility Improvements
Our DRAFT Analysis Shows Of the 300k passenger vehicle trips that
enter the “Ring of Congestion” Daily
36% are less than 3 miles
If only 15% of these trips 0-3 miles and 7% of trips 3-9 miles
are converted to bicycle trips
There would be a total reduction of 7% all motor vehicle trips to the Ring of Congestion
The “Ring of Congestion”
Level Playing Field
Maintenance Plan
58
Connections are Key
WHAT DO YOU WISH YOU
HAD KNOWN?
Design Takes Time and a Commitment to
Context
• Help from local consulting firms has been limited as city engineering staff seem to outpace the educational awareness of PBL design
• Engineering training has been robust, but application of design principals continues to be challenged and evolve
• There is no cookie-cutter design for every roadway – a higher level of involvement from engineering staff is necessary
What Materials Will Be Durable and Inexpensive
• New resources and peer experiences are now available that make decisions more informed than before
• Material choice involves as much consideration regarding context as the geometric and regulatory design
• Choosing the appropriate materials that are both cost effective and durable is important, but little information exists
How Easily People Would Grasp the Motivation for
PBL’s
• Once PBL’s become a part of casual expectations from community members, the political will to develop them increases
• The greater base of support for PBL’s exists outside of traditional advocates, riding clubs, and athletes
• The concepts behind PBL’s are intuitive and are intimately familiar to the experiences of individuals and families
1. NO TIENES PLAN?
2. ADA PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Van Accessible Parking Space Guadalupe Street Protected Lane
3. DON’T UNDERESTIMATE SUPPORT FOR PROTECTED BIKE LANES
I will admit that I was your biggest skeptic in regards to the bike lanes on North Plaza where I have lived for the last 16 years. I, however, was pleasantly surprised at the outstanding (and quickly done!) job. I commend the planners, the engineers and the workers.
Valet and Loading
Photo credit: Seattle Bike Blog
Three Dimensions
72
Historic Districts
73
74