city of hughson city of modesto city of newman city of oakdale … · 2014-12-02 · kari mcnickle...

City of Ceres ● City of Hughson ● City of Modesto ● City of Newman ● City of Oakdale ● City of Patterson City of Riverbank ● City of Turlock ● City of Waterford ● County of Stanislaus

SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308

MODESTO, CA DECEMBER 2, 2014 (TUESDAY)

8:30 AM

Committee Agendas and Minutes: Committee agendas, minutes and copies of items to be considered by the StanCOG Committee are available at least 72 hours prior to the meeting at the StanCOG offices located at 1111 “I” Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA during normal business hours. The documents are also available on StanCOG’s website at www.stancog.org/committees.shtm. Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Committee after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the address listed above during normal business hours. These documents are also available on StanCOG’s website, subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting. Public Comment Period: Matters under the jurisdiction of the Committee, and not on the posted agenda, may be addressed by the general public at the beginning of the regular agenda and any off-agenda matters before the Committee for consideration. However, California law prohibits the Committee from taking action on any matter which is not on the posted agenda unless it is determined to be an emergency by the Committee. Any member of the public wishing to address the Committee during the “Public Comment” period will be limited to 5 minutes unless the Chair of the Committee grants a longer period of time. At a Special Meeting, members of the public may address the Board on any item on the Agenda at the time the item is considered by the Board. Public Participation on a Matter on the Agenda: Please step to the podium at the time the agenda item is announced by the Chairperson. In order to ensure that interested parties have an opportunity to speak, any person addressing the Committee will be limited to a maximum of 5 minutes unless the Chair of the Committee grants a longer period of time. Reasonable Accommodations: This Agenda shall be made available upon request in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact Cindy Malekos at (209) 525-4600 during regular business hours at least 72 hours prior to the time of the meeting to enable StanCOG to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Notice Regarding Non-English Speakers: StanCOG Committee meetings are conducted in English and translations to other languages is not provided. Anyone wishing to address the Committee is advised to have an interpreter or to contact Cindy Malekos at (209) 525-4600 during regular business hours at least 72 hours prior to the time of the meeting so that StanCOG can provide an interpreter. Aviso con Respecto a Personas que no Hablan el Idioma de Inglés: Las reuniónes del los Comités del Consejo de Gobiernos de Stanislaus son conducidas en Inglés y traducciones a otros idiomas no son disponibles. Cualquier persona que desea dirigirse al Comité se le aconseja que traiga su propio intérprete o llame a Cindy Malekos al (209) 525-4600 durante horas de oficina regulares o a lo menos 72 horas antes de la reunión del Consejo de Gobiernos de Stanislaus, para proporcionarle con un intérprete.

AGENDA

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS

The public may comment on each item on the agenda as it arises.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve SSTAC Minutes of 9-2-14 B. Motion to Recommend Policy Board Adopt Resolution 14-XX Distribution of FY 2013/14

Proposition 1B CTSGP-CTAF Allocation 5. PRESENTATION

A. Commute Connection Annual Report

6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS

A. Motion to Recommend Policy Board Adopt by Resolution 14-XX the changes to the Definitions

of “Unmet Transit Need” and “Reasonable to Meet” B. Motion to Recommend Policy Board Direct Staff to Release a Request for Proposal for the

StanCOG Human Services Coordination Plan C. Motion to Recommend Policy Board Approve Meeting Schedule for Calendar Year 2015 D. Caltrans Low Carbon Transit Operations Program

7. TRANSIT MANAGER/CTSA REPORTS

8. INFORMATION ITEMS A. Call for Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-15 FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and

Individuals with Disabilities Program Grant Funds B. Distribution of FY 2014/15 Proposition 1B – PTMISEA Funds Allocation in the Amount of

$5,463,529 C. Commute Connection Monthly Reports – October 2014

9. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT

10. MEMBER REPORTS

11. ADJOURNMENT

Next Regularly Scheduled SSTAC Meeting: January 6, 2015 (Tuesday) @ 8:30 am StanCOG Board Room 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA

CONSENT

CALENDAR

5 L (I II i s I (I " s

City of Ceres • City of Hughson • City of Modesto • City of Newman • City of Oakdale • City of Patterson City of Riverbank • City of Turlock • City of Waterford• County of Stanislaus

SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (SSTAC) MEETING StanCOG Board Room

MEMBERS PRESENT:

ALSO PRESENT:

1. CALL TO ORDER

1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA

Minutes of September 2, 2014 (Tuesday) 8:30am

Lillian Castigliano (COA); Fred Cavanah (City of Modesto - arrived during Item 6B); Stacie Morales (CTSA); Monica Ramos (Catholic Charities); George Sharp (DRAIL)

Kay Dunkel (City of Ceres); Eunice Lovi, Fayma Ishaq (Stanislaus County); Scott Medeiros (City of Turlock); Carlos Yamzon, Rosa Park, Regina Valentine, Debbie Trujillo; Arthur Chen, Travis Jacobs, Cathy Wang (StanCOG); Kari McNickle, Lisa Donahue (Commute Connection)

Chair Stacie Morales called the meeting to order at 8:40a.m.

2. ROLLCALL

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS- None

4. CONSENT CALENDAR

A. Motion to Approve SSTAC Minutes of8-5-14

*By Motion (Stacie Morales, Monica Ramos), and a unanimous vote, the Council approved the minutes of 8-5-14.

5. PRESENTATIONS

A. Rideshare Week- October 6-10,2014 Kari McNickle gave a presentation on Rideshare Week that would be held October 6-10, 2014. She also introduced new staff member Lisa Donahue who would be focused on the Stanislaus County Commute Connection program.

Page 1 of 3

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 4A

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS

A. Unmet Transit Needs Defmition Review Regina Valentine reported that the public hearing process for FY 2015/16 would begin soon, but that StanCOG's adopted definitions of "unrnet transit need" and "reasonable to meet" must be reviewed prior to the hearings. She said that any revisions of the definition would need Policy Board approval. She stated that a subcommittee would be formed and that staff recommended Stacie Morales and Fred Cavanah to participate in the subcommittee. Both agreed to participate.

B. Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 Call for Projects Update Regina Valentine mentioned that Caltrans would be releasing a Call for Projects on October 1, 2014 for the 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program. She announced that StanCOG would be hosting a Caltrans workshop for Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPA) on September 10, 2014 from lOam to 2pm to provide eligibility requirements, the application process, and timeline. She also announced that an application workshop would be held at StanCOG on October 30, 2014 from 9am to lpm for applicants. She stated that applications must be submitted to the RTPAs by December 1, 2014.

C. Bicycle Pedestrian Survey Stephen Bonrepos of the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee provided information on the Pedestrian Survey and asked the SSTAC Members and Transit Operators to provide their input to staff.

D. Transportation Expenditure Plan for a Regional Transportation Tax Measure Update Carlos Y amzon reported that the educational outreach process was planned to begin sometime after the November 2014 election. Member Fred Cavanah suggested that the plan include funds that would help supplement transit fares for seniors and the disabled. He said the funds could help keep the discounted fares low and assist the operators in reaching the required farebox recovery ratios.

7. TRANSIT MANAGERS/CTSA REPORT Fred Cavanah provided a brief report on MAX and MADAR services. He mentioned that the downtown transit center bathroom project was out to bid and that the new buses would be arriving soon. He reviewed the various marketing tools that are used for MAX such as advertising on buses, benches, and pharmacy bags as well as the ride guides.

Eunice Lovi provided new ride guides for StaRT and highlighted some of the changes. She also went over the various ways of marketing and outreach which includes community fairs and events; unmet transit needs process/hearings, and different forms of advertising such as radio and newspapers.

Kay Dunkel gave a brief report on CAT services and updated members about a new bus purchase and the automated fare boxes. She also went over the various marketing and outreach methods such as radio, cable, and newspaper advertising as well as community events and fairs. She said the new ride guides would be available in the near future.

Scott Medeiros provided a report on BLAST services and updated members on the new ride guide and route changes. He also went over the marketing and outreach methods used such as various community events, Bike to Work Week, and the Farmers Market. He stated that a new Transit System Manager had been hired.

Page 2 of 3

Stacie Morales reported on the veteran's van project. She mentioned the various marketing and outreach methods that are used such as attending different community events and fairs, congregate meal site visits, and handing out literature to the public.

10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Carlos Yamzon introduced new employees Cathy Wang and Travis Jacobs and announced Vince Canales' resignation.

11. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS Member Monica Ramos mentioned that Catholic Charities had been working on their Title VI program. She also stated that the RSVP program started on July 1, 2014.

Member George Sharp briefly reported on his recent trip to Washington D.C. He mentioned that he met with Congressman Jeff Denham and discussed funding for transit in the rural areas of Stanislaus County. He also commented on the recent ADA lawsuits that had been in the news.

Member Lillian Castigliano mentioned that she had been attending Stanislaus Elder Abuse Prevention Alliance (SEAP A) events.

Chair Stacie Morales mentioned, on the recommendation of staff, that the October SSTAC meeting scheduled for September 30, 2014 would be cancelled. She said that SSTAC would reconvene on November 4, 2014.

12. ADJOURNMENT

Chair Stacie Morales adjourned the meeting at 10:00 a.m.

Next Regularly Scheduled SSTAC Meeting: November 4, 2014 (Tuesday) @ 8:30am StanCOG Board Room 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA

Minutes Prepared By:

Page 3 of 3

1111 I Street, Suite 308 ● Modesto, CA 95354 ● 209.525.4600 ● Fax 209.558.7833 ● www.stancog.org


TO: Social Services Transportation Advisory Council Staff Report (SSTAC) Motion THROUGH: Carlos P. Yamzon, Executive Director

FROM: Rosa De León Park, Deputy Executive Director Regina Valentine, Associate Planner

DATE: November 20, 2014

SUBJECT: Distribution of FY 2013/14 Proposition 1B - California Transit Security Grant Program - California Transit Assistance Fund (CTSGP-CTAF) Allocation

Recommendation By Motion: Recommend that the Policy Board adopt Resolution 14-XX, adopting the distribution of FY 2013/14 Proposition 1B - California Transit Security Grant Program - California Transit Assistance Fund (CTSGP-CTAF) allocation. Background On November 7, 2006, voters approved the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, as part of Proposition 1B, which authorizes the issuance of approximately $19.925 billion in general obligation funds for specified purposes, including grants for transit system safety, security, and disaster response projects. Senate Bill 88 (SB 88) was signed by the Governor and chaptered into law on August 24, 2007, implementing the provisions of the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006. The Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is a designated recipient of Proposition 1B Transit Security Grant Program funds for the Stanislaus region. Funds allocated to the Stanislaus region for the FY 2013/14 California Transit Security Grant Program - California Transit Assistance Fund (CTSGP-CTAF) total $442,841 for the fiscal year. Allocation of these funds is based on the State Controller's distribution formula for State Transit Assistance (STA) funds, pursuant to Sections 99313 and 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code and Government Code Sections 8879.57(a)(2) and 8879.57(a)(3). StanCOG has no control over the formula. Some funds are directly apportioned to Modesto, Stanislaus County, and Turlock, leaving $413,426 for the fiscal year for distribution to the region by StanCOG. Matching funds are not required for

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 4B


this program. Table 1, below, illustrates a breakdown of how these funds are allocated to the Stanislaus region.

Table 1: Stanislaus Region CTSGP-CTAF Allocation for FY 2013/14

Agency FY 2013/14 Modesto $25,606

Stanislaus County $2,511 Turlock $1,298

StanCOG for Regional Distribution $413,426 TOTAL $442,841

Pursuant to the CTSGP-CTAF Guidance, eligible activities to receive program funds include the following:

(A) A capital project that provides increased protection against a security or safety threat, including, but not limited to the following:

1. Construction or renovation projects that are designed to enhance the security of

public transit stations, tunnels, guideways, elevated structures or other transit facilities and equipment;

2. Explosive device mitigation and remediation equipment; 3. Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear explosives search, rescue or

response equipment; 4. Interoperable communications equipment; 5. Physical security enhancement equipment; 6. The installation of fencing, barriers, gates or related security enhancements that

are designed to improve the physical security of transit stations, tunnels, guideways, elevated structures or other transit facilities and equipment; and

7. Other security related projects approved by the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA).

(B) A capital project that increases the capacity of transit operators to prepare for

disaster-response transportation systems that can move people, goods, emergency personnel and equipment in the aftermath of a disaster.

(C) Other allowable cost under California Government Code 16727(a) include costs directly

related to construction or acquisition, including, but not limited to, planning, engineering, construction management, architectural, and other design work, environmental impact reports and assessments, required mitigation expenses, appraisals, legal expenses, site acquisitions, and necessary easements and warranties.

Management and Administration costs are not an allowable expense for Proposition 1B funds. Discussion As the designated recipient for the remaining $413,426 for the fiscal year, StanCOG is responsible for working with the region's public transit agencies in facilitating the distribution of these funds. StanCOG met with the region's transit operators on November 4, 2014 to review the


agencies' needs and allocate the $413,426 to those agencies electing to participate in the program. Of the transit agencies, only Stanislaus County requested to utilize the region's available funds for eligible projects. Agencies that did not receive or request funds from this program elected not to participate due to application and eligibility requirements established by the CTSGP-CTAF program. Tables 2, below, identifies the distribution of StanCOG's allocation of $413,426 for FY 2013/14.

Table 2: Distribution of FY 2013/14 CTSGP-CTAF Allocation

Agency Project Project Description

Prop. 1B CTSGP-CTAF FY 2013/14

Funding Amount GC 8879.55(a)(2)/PUC 99313

Ceres No Project Submitted N/A $0 Modesto No Project Submitted N/A $0

Stanislaus County

Security Systems on Buses

Installation of an AVL system on the buses $413,426

Turlock No Project Submitted N/A $0 TOTAL $413,426

Should you have any questions regarding these funding programs, the application materials, or this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachments:

1. Resolution 14-XX Approving the Distribution of FY 2013-14 Proposition 1B - California Transit Security Grant Program - California Transit Assistance Fund (CTSGP-CTAF) Allocation

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]


STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

RESOLUTION 14-XX

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DISTRIBUTION OF FY 2013/14 PROPOSITION 1B -

CALIFORNIA TRANSIT SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM - CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND (CTSGP - CTAF) ALLOCATION

WHEREAS, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is a Regional Transportation

Planning Agency, a Metropolitan Planning Organization, and the designated Council of Governments for Stanislaus County; and

WHEREAS, the California Transit Security Grant Program - California Transit Assistance Fund

(CTSGP - CTAF) was established to provide funding to local transit agencies for the protection of surface transportation, infrastructure, and the traveling public from acts of terrorism, major disasters, and other emergencies; and

WHEREAS, StanCOG has been appointed by the California Emergency Management Agency

(Cal EMA) as the designated recipient for the distribution of CTSGP - CTAF program fund allocations in the amount of $413,426 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 and $413,426; and

WHEREAS, StanCOG, in collaboration with and from consensus of the region’s transit

managers, developed Table 1, contained in Exhibit A, which identify the projects selected by the region's transit operators based on existing transit related security needs; and

WHEREAS, once approved by the StanCOG Policy Board, the projects identified in Table 1,

contained in Exhibit A, will be provided to Cal EMA for final approval; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the StanCOG Policy Board approves the

distribution of FY 2013/14 Proposition 1B - CTSGP - CTAF allocations, as identified in Table 1, contained in Exhibit A.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Policy Board authorizes the StanCOG Executive

Director to execute all required documents and any amendments thereto of the CTSGP – CTAF program to the California Department of Transportation to effectuate the allocations identified in Exhibit A.

The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Stanislaus Council of Governments, on the 17th day of December 2014. A motion was made and seconded to adopt the foregoing Resolution. Motion carried and the Resolution was adopted.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2014

__________________________________________ VITO CHIESA, CHAIRMAN

ATTEST __________________________________________ CARLOS P. YAMZON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Exhibit A

Table 1: Distribution of FY 2013/14 CTSGP-CTAF Allocation

Agency Project Project Description

Prop. 1B CTSGP-CTAF FY 2013/14

Funding Amount GC8879.55(a)(2)/PUC99313

Ceres No Project Submitted N/A $0 Modesto No Project Submitted N/A $0

Stanislaus County

Security Systems on Buses

Installation of an AVL system on the buses $413,426

Turlock No Project Submitted N/A $0 TOTAL $413,426

PRESENTATIONS



TO: Social Services Transportation Advisory Council Staff Report (SSTAC) Presentation THROUGH: Carlos P. Yamzon, Executive Director



SUBJECT: Commute Connection Annual Report

Background Commute Connection is the transportation demand management (TDM) program for the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG). As a designated non-attainment region, the Commute Connection program serves as Stanislaus County’s transportation control measure that satisfies the mitigation measure requirements contained in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s air quality plan. Implementing this program also allows the Stanislaus region to receive approximately seven million dollars ($7,000,000) annually in federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. Discussion: Commute Connection has served as the TDM program for Stanislaus County since 1987. Commute Connection provides the following services for StanCOG:

• Rideshare matching; • Vanpool formation, subsidies and maintenance; • Employer and commuter outreach promotions and education; • Emergency Ride Home Program; and • Marketing of services to the commuting public and employers.

A highlight from the Fiscal Year 2013-14 is a Commuter Database with 7,917 commuters (494 added this year) and 157 vanpools (25 added this year).

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 5A


Employer and Community Outreach Each year Commute Connection coordinates Bike to Work and Rideshare Week to elevate the importance of not driving alone when possible to improve the environment and promote the options to choose an alternative through biking, walking, carpooling, vanpooling, riding the bus. Event Results:

• Rideshare Week attracted 597 participants • Corporate Challenge Winners included Pacific Coast Producers, City of Modesto and

City of Merced • Bike to Work Week increased participation from previous year by 37%, with 354

participants • Corporate Challenge Winners included Visionary Home Builders, City of Newman and

City of Merced Outreach & Activities:

• Distribution of a record 41 active vanpool subsidies, representing almost $74,000 contributed towards reducing costs for vanpoolers

• Served as a resource to over 136 employers registered with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Trip Reduction Rule 9410

• Participated in over 200 employer and community meetings and events • Launched transit recognition events during Rideshare Week at park and ride lots • Partnered with San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Diamond Foods, Frito

Lay, Delicato, Blue Diamond, San Joaquin Bicycle Coalition, REI for donations and sponsorships

Future Enhancements In order to meet the new demands and adapt to the changing environment, the Commute Connection program will be enhancing several program tools and expanding outreach to reach a wider audience. The following summarizes plans for FY 14-15.

• TDM System: Development is underway to create a multi-modal trip planner, enhanced ridematching and contact management system to include a smart phone application. This will provide convenience and accessibility for commuters to make informed decisions on their transportation choices.

• Marketing & Website Project: This effort will engage stakeholders in the development of

a marketing campaign, program re-branding and new website. This will include focus groups and surveys to help craft messages and goals to effectively promote transportation options through tools, incentives, outreach and events.

• Multi-modal Environment: Commute Connection will be available to assist agencies and

employers with research on bicycle and park and ride lot amenities/facilities as needed as


well as provide reports from program activities to assist with employer and community planning.

Full details of Commute Connection’s activities and accomplishments for FY13-14 are included in Commute Connection’s The Commute Enquirer. Should you have further questions regarding this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachments:

1. Commute Connection’s The Commute Enquirer

[email protected]



1

FREE V0l. 01 ISS. 2

ALL THE NEWS THAT’S FIT TO PRINT FROM FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014

FISCAL YEAR 13-14

THE COMMUTE ENQUIRER

SPECIAL COLLECTOR’S EDITION!

CAUGHT IN THE ACT

BICYCLISTS ON THE LOOSE!PLUS: GET MORE

MONEY IN YOUR POCKET LEGALLY!

YOU’LL NEVER BELIEVE THESE RECORD NUMBERS!

SHOCKING TRAVEL STORIES:

CARPOOLING: SO EASY A DOG COULD DO IT?

THE TEAM

INSIDE CONTRIBUTORS

CAUGHT IN THE ACT

“RSW” - IT’S CONTAGIOUS

COMMUTER BUZZ

2013 BOMBSHELL

GET OUT OF THE GAS TRAP

KARI MCNICKLEOUTREACH JUNKIE

LISA DONAHUEEVENTS MAGICIAN

YVETTE DAVISCOMMUTE COMMANDER

TERESA GARCIARIDEMATCHING NINJA

ABOUT COMMUTECONNECTIONCommute Connection serves the commuters and employers of San Joaquin, Stanislaus & Merced counties. The goal of the program is to improve air quality and reduce congestion by promoting sustainable alternatives to driving alone, such as walking, biking, carpooling, vanpooling, telecommuting, and using transit.

The program includes a wide range of programs and outreach services for commuters and employers, including a ride-matching system, vanpool formation assistance, transit and tax credit information, commuter subsidies, an Emergency Ride Home program, and various marketing services. Commute Connection also coordinates two major event campaigns annually, Rideshare Week in the fall, and Bike to Work Week in the spring.

Commute Connection is a program of the San Joaquin Council of Governments, Stanislaus Council of Governments, and Merced County Association of Governments.

1-800-52-SHARE WWW.COMMUTECONNECTION.COM

1

ACROSS San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced counties, a record number of commuters are accessing more free dollars than ever before – and believe it or not, it’s totally legal! Exclusive to the Commute Enquirer, we have the details on how you can get your share.

VANPOOLERS:How does $150 off your van’s costs sound? Seriously, knock a quick $150 per van off your lease costs through Commute Connection’s monthly subsidy, for up to one year. In addition, you can get $30 per person per month from the Air District, for up to 3 years. Maybe you like spending money on gas,

but there are a lot of things you can do with $1000 extra dollars in your pocket besides feed it to a pump.

CARPOOLERS:Register your group today and get a $50 gas card! No kidding - $50 just for getting another person in your car. This one-time benefit is perfect to put towards that first week of gas for your new carpool.

RECORDS? BROKEN!Commute Connection currently has 41 active vanpool subsidies. This past year, that amounted to almost $74,000 contributed towards reducing costs for vanpoolers - the highest amount EVER.

When a community comes together, we have to take note! Turlock did great work this year in promoting transportation throughout the community. Their success was largely due to the power of partnerships: city employees, local businesses, community groups, and Commute Connection all banded together to promote Bike to Work Day at the Turlock Farmer’s Market, which culminated in a group ride through some of the City’s scenic cycling paths.

OTHER EFFORTS UNDERWAY INCLUDE:

•Development of a Bike/Ped Master Plan

• A prospective new Park-n-Ride lot

• Possible expansion of the Turlock Regional Transit Center

• The Bike Turlock Project

VANPOOL SUBSIDIES HIT RECORD HIGH!

THE SHOCKING

TRUTH

ROLLIN’ IN TURLOCK

“I LOVED SEEING THE INCREASED AMOUNT OF BICYCLISTS ON THE STREETS! THERE’S POWER IN NUMBERS!”-SIMON B., CITY OF TURLOCK

TURLOCK GONE WILDCommunity Unites For Transportation

MORE VANPOOLS THAN EVER BEFORE!

NEW VANPOOLSADDED!

SAN JOAQUIN | 115STANISLAUS | 36

MERCED | 6

SAN JOAQUIN | 17STANISLAUS | 7

MERCED | 1

VANPOOLERS GETSPECIAL TREATMENT

2

EMPLOYERS CAUGHT IN THE ACT!

WE’RE NUTS FOR OUR SPONSORS!

UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC has made ridesharing

attractive by designating preferred parking

throughout campus for carpools and vanpools.

356 ACTIVE EMPLOYERS207 EVENTS & MEETINGS

UC MERCED’S Dero is a one-stop shop

for bicycle repairs. Great way to support

budding cyclists!

COASTAL PACIFIC supports their eTrip by

posting transit, rideshare and bicycling

info for employees

CRYSTAL CREAMERY recently received Green Certification in recognition of their efforts to promote

sustainability, including ridesharing and biking.

Large employers throughout the Valley are subject to Air District Rule 9410. Now, this isn’t just some elementary school rule - it actually helps the region reduce air pollution!

Employers commit to a series of measures that will help reduce the number of trips employees must take to and from work. Commute Connection’s programs work with Rule 9410 to help employers find strategies that work for them, including starting an internal rideshare program, distributing transit information to employees, help with forming vanpools, and more!

CITY OF LODI employees were led on a bike tour

through the town by City Manager Steve Schwa-

bauer - way to lead from the top!

KNOW THERULES

THANK YOU TO OUR GENEROUS SPONSORS FOR SUPPORTING OUR EVENTS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.

3

A new trend is spreading like wildfire across the region, and we’re calling it Rideshare Week. Just this past year, 597 people caught the fever and pledged to give up their lonely solo commute and try carpooling, vanpooling and using transit.

Patients ranged from young to old, super commuters to those traveling just within the same city. All in all, 13 different counties benefited from Commute Connection’s outreach in San Joaquin, Stanislaus & Merced counties.

The hope for a cure for Rideshare Week is small. Over 80% of participants reported that they had continued to share their ride after Rideshare Week. A similar percentage reported that the main reason they were motivated to participate was to save money, followed by environment and convenience (49% and 45%, respectively).

All told, Rideshare Week participants travel an estimated 24,681+ vehicle miles every day they commute. By matching up with others for carpools and vanpools, and connecting with information on their transit options, Rideshare Week participants reduce the negative effects of driving alone on our air quality and roadways.Rideshare Week fever is going around again – keep your eyes peeled for an outbreak on October 6-10, 2014!

One prize winning participant, Brenda Delatorre, is a true example of a multi-county and multi-modal commuter, traveling from stockton to berkeley via scooter, ace, bart, and her own two feet. While it takes her a little longer than driving, Brenda reported that the quiet time spent relaxing on the train made it worthwhile.

“RSW”ITS CONTAGIOUS

POTENTIAL SIDE EFFECTS

BRENDA DELATORRE

• DECREASE IN COMMUTE STRESS

• NEW FRIENDS AND CONNECTIONS

• MORE NAPS!

•MONEY IN YOUR POCKETS

•GENERAL SENSE OF WELL-BEING

4

“I have recommended to many people to try some form of commute option to determine if they really need their vehicle. In each case the result was that the person seldom did.” Dave D., Board of Equalization (and 15 year vanpool driver)

ADIOS TO THE SOV?

2013 BOMBSHELL!THE FUTURE REVEALED

Commute Connection was established in 1978. While the longevity of the program shows its’ value and effectiveness (it outlasted Disco!), not much has occurred since then in the way of upgrading tools or revamping services. With the increase in transit use, awareness of other transportation options, and the rise of services such as Uber and Lyft, Commute Connection is changing with the environment to offer more convenience and accessibility to help commuters make informed decisions. Here’s a sneak peek at what the program has planned for the future:

TDM SYSTEM: Development is underway to create a multi-modal trip planner, along with an enhanced ridematching and contact management system, including a smart phone application. This will provide convenience and accessibility for commuters to make informed decisions on the go about their transportation choices.

MARKETING & WEBSITE PROJECT: This effort will engage stakeholders in the development of a marketing campaign, program re-branding and new website. This will include focus groups and surveys to help craft messages and goals to effectively promote transportation options through tools, incentives, outreach and events.

MULTI-MODAL ENVIRONMENT: Commute Connection will be available to assist agencies and employers with research on bicycle and park & ride lot amenities/facilities as needed, as well as provide reports from program activities to assist with employer and community planning.

Well, not in the literal sense, of course. The Commute Connection program aims to assist commuters in finding the right options for their travels. With the program’s goal of improving air quality and reducing congestion, it is the hope that commuters will choose an alternative way to get around whenever possible. Luckily, the numbers support the need (and the interest!) in finding an alternative:

• On average, 48% of the region’s workers commute outside of their home county

• The average one-way commute is 31 MILES

• There are nearly 8,000 COMMUTERS registered in the Commute Connection ridematching system

• An estimated 3,747,071 VEHICLE MILES were reduced from the roadway through commuter registrations this year

E X CL U SI V E!

“This can go a long way for people’s health and reducing congestion on the roads.” Andrew D., Hilmar Cheese Company

5

BUZZBUZZ WHAT’S HOT OR NOT FOR YOUR

TRAVEL OPTIONS

We’re not pulling your leg - but we may be pedaling it. Biking and walking are on the hot list right now, and interest in what’s been dubbed “Active Transportation” is skyrocketing across the region.

During Bike to Work Week this year, a record-breaking number of participants decided to put their feet to work. How many exactly? Over 873 - a 37% increase over last year.

Why the uptick? Well for one thing, there were plenty of chances for people to pound the pavement and win prizes this year. Stanislaus County led the pack with 5 community events in May, as well as the highest number of participants (check below for all the details!).

On top of this, those much discussed millenials are stealing headlines again, this time with new research showing that car sales are down for their age group by 30%. If we had to bet, we’d say this trend towards more people-friendly commutes is going to stay hot!

BICYCLISTS ROLLING OVER THE VALLEY? BIKE TO WORK WEEK STEALS THE SHOW WITH RECORD NUMBERS

37%INCREASE!

FABULOUS!

COMMUTER

STANISLAUS COUNTY LED THE PACK WITH 360 PARTICIPANTSCommunity Events in Modesto, Oakdale, Turlock, Patterson, Newman

CHECK THE NUM8ERS!

San Joaquin County 354 Participants Community Events in Stockton, Lodi, Escalon

Merced County 158 Participants5 Energizer Stations across the City of Merced

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED WERE REDUCED AS A RESULT OF BIKE TO WORK WEEK

OVER

15,000

THAT’S EQUAL TO 12,172 LBS OF C02 - OR THE AMOUNT THAT 468 YOUNG TREES COULD ABSORB IN ONE YEAR.

6

STYLISH!

LIBRA September 23 - October 22 You seek balance in your life, and so much time driving alone is throwing off your social scale. Time to join a vanpool, Libra!

SCORPIO October 23 - November 21 You may encounter a friend in need today. Reach out to someone that you think could use a lift.

SAGITTARIUS November 22 - Dec 21 Your mental ability could be sluggish and lazy today. This is usually a sign that you simply need to slow down and relax. Opt to take the train for a relaxing break from reality.

CAPRICORN December 22 - January 19 You need to try a big change on for size and today gives you the safety and security you need to go for it. Get rid of the car for the day and ride your bike!

AQUARIUS January 20 - February 18 There’s a great deal of fuel to keep your fire raging today, Aquarius. Dust off your bike and use that fire to get a workout in on your ride to work.

PISCES February 19 - March 20 Today’s not the day for too much deep thought. Take the time to enjoy the scenery on your commute today.

THE COMMUTE ENQUIRER

FIND YOUR BEST TRAVEL OPTIONS FOR THE NEXT MONTH!

WRITTEN IN THE STARS

LEO July 23 - August 22 This is your time to shine, Leo! Rideshare Week is coming up, and YOU have a talent for bringing people together! Use this skill to help your coworkers find new carpools and compete for the prize!

ARIES March 21 - April 19 A big adventure awaits you today - purchase the ticket, and hit the road! Don’t be surprised to hear from an old friend.

TAURUS April 20 - May 20 Your mental clarity is astounding today, Taurus! Today’s the perfect day to take the lead in your carpool and be the driver.

GEMINI May 21 - June 20 You may notice some jealous looks from other drivers. Is it your devilish good looks? Or that you’re whizzing by them in the carpool lane?

CANCER June 21 - July 22 Tune into the big picture and contemplate making a long-term change. Consider some eco-friendly options - vanpool, carpool, or even a train!

VIRGO August 23 - September 22 Don’t gamble away your resources, Virgo. Take the safest route. Get frugal today and avoid traffic by hopping on the bus.

BY STAR E. KNIGHT

B N C P O C E K S X Q N J K Q I O H B M A E R U U I M Y P L C I B E B R T O A A B R E O Y Y T D U S B O E R H T S O A T C U S N A O M T K E S P I R O L L X F G N S H L C R E A D V E L H A W D Y E R A I N D V Y Y O U S D I C A C N S T J I Z E P D M S O J Y K I K I D P R N T R H M X L O T P E D A L K O M R M U I E D I R N K R A P M A U I R D E T U M M O C W Y W T N E P E P W E C F L M A C E Z G F O Q I Y P C F S N L B V A N P O O L V O H A M H K Y

GET OUT OF THE GAS TRAP!CAN YOU ROUTE YOUR WAY TO ALL THE WORDS IN THIS PUZZLE, AND ESCAPE THE GAS MONSTER?

AceBicycleBusCarbon DioxideCarpoolCommuteGas

HOVMoney Park N RidePedalPollutionRideshareSubsidy

TelecommuteTicket TrainTransitTripVanpoolWalk

DISCUSSION &

ACTION ITEMS






SUBJECT: Definition Review for Unmet Transit Needs

Recommendation By Motion: Recommend that the Policy Board adopt Resolution 14-XX, adopting changes to the definitions of “Unmet Transit Need” and “Reasonable to Meet.” Background Pursuant to the Transportation Development Act (TDA), the Stanislaus Council of Governments as the designated regional transportation planning agency must annually complete an Unmet Transit Needs (UTN) Assessment process. This process identifies and analyzes potential transit needs for reasonableness based upon adopted state and local guidelines. The purpose of the unmet transit needs assessment process is to identify any unmet transit need(s) that may be present anywhere in the County and determine whether any identified are reasonable to meet. If an unmet transit need is identified as “reasonable to meet”, it must be funded prior to Local Transportation Funds (LTF) being allocated for non-transit purposes, such as local streets and roads. Discussion: The Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) held the first public hearing for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 UTN Assessment at the StanCOG Policy Board meeting on November 19, 2014. Before the UTN analysis can begin, StanCOG’s adopted definitions of “unmet transit need” and “reasonable to meet” must be reviewed and possibly revised for Policy Board adoption. At the September 2014 meeting, Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) formed a subcommittee consisting of two council members and one member of StanCOG staff to review the previous definitions and report suggested changes to the SSTAC.

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 6A


The subcommittee’s revised definitions marked in track changes of “unmet transit need” and “reasonable to meet” are provided in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. Staff will utilize these definitions to identify if a potential “unmet transit need” meets the Policy Board’s definition. If an unmet transit need is identified, staff further analyzes that need to determine whether or not it satisfies the adopted definition for “reasonable to meet.” Table 1

Definition of Unmet Transit Need

An "unmet transit need" is a need for transportation for an individual or group of individuals

within any part of Stanislaus County, which has not been funded and implemented and which has been accurately documented on the U nmet Transit Need "Request for Transit Service" f orm.

Unmet needs include, but are not necessarily limited to, needs for traditional fixed-route trans it, curb-to-curb or door-to-door paratransit service, and "door-through-door" service (trips t hat originate inside a building or residence and terminate inside a destination building or residence), as long as some portion of the trip is taken via a motorized vehicle having four or more wheels

and operated by a professional or volunteer driver whose primary purpose is to transport individuals or groups of individuals over public rights of way. Unmet transit needs include A "specialized service~" is one that provides- transportation tailored to the unique needs of the individual being served in a manner that exceeds the level of service described in the literature published by the city or county entity that provides traditional fixed-route or paratransit service to the area in which the unmet need is thought to exist. Potential transit needs may be identified by community members or through a local or regional planning process. Although, some services

may be restricted or give priority to traditionally transit-dependent populations (such as elderly,

youths, persons with disabilities, or low-income persons), all eligible users should have equivalent access or opportunity to use the service. At a minimum, this may include req uests for

transportation services which are identified through the annual TDA Unmet Transit Needs hearings, by the SSTAC, in the Regional Transportation Plan, in the Short-Range Transit Plan of any transit operator, in any study of unmet transit needs prepared or formally accep ted by the

StanCOG Policy Board, or in a compliance plan for the Americans with Disabilities Act as prepared by any public or private entity. Unmet transit needs are no t:

1. Trips, which would duplicate transportation services

2. A need for transportation service beyond the fiscal year under consideration


Table 2

Definition of Reasonable to Meet

An identified unmet transit needs- will be determined to be "reasonable to meet" if it is

demonstrated, t o the satisfaction of the StanCOG Policy Board, that the transit need can be met

within the following performance and financial standards:

1. Any new service developed to meet an unmet transit need shall achieve at least 50% of

the system-wide performance standards, as found in the Transit Cost Sharing Procedures adopted by the StanCOG Policy Board, except in the case of an extension of service

determined to be a necessary lifeline* service for transit dependent populations.

*Lifeline Service: A service necessary to access community services within Stanislaus County that are needed to sustain an individual's physical and mental health, as

determined by StanCOG Policy Board.

2. Any new service developed to meet an unmet transit need shall not cause the system of

which it is a part to fail to meet the systemwide performance standards.

3. Any new service developed to meet an unmet transit need will not require the expenditure of more Local Transportation Funds than are available to the jurisdiction for

transit.

4. Any new specialized service would be required to meet TDA requirements and be eligible

for LTF funding under article 4 "Claims for Funds", Article 4 .5 "Claims for Community

Transit Services", and Article 8 "Other Claims for Funds".

5. An unmet transit need that requires specialized service will not reduce the amount of TDA

funding needed by a City or County t o continue to provide public transit services unless

determined otherwise by the StanCOG Policy Board as demonstrated by their approval of

claims submitted under article 4.5 "Claims for Community Transit Services" o f the

Transportation Development Act (TDA).

The determination o f whether an unmet transit need is "reasonable to meet" shall take into account as appropriate :

1. If the time period needed to implement the required corrective action (e.g. major

purchases, planning requirement) is greater than one year, an unmet transit need may be declared not reasonable to meet. However, the funding must be delegated for actions

necessary during the ensuing fiscal year to meet the unmet transit need during the

following fiscal year. An unmet t ransit need shal l not be determined unreasonable to meet

more than once on these gro unds.

2. The fact than an identified transit need cannot be fully met based on available resources

shall not be the sole reason for a finding that a transit need is not reasonable to meet.

3. StanCOG's Policy Board determination of needs t hat are reasonable t o meet shall not be made by comparing unmet transit needs with the need for streets and roads.


Should you have further questions regarding this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution 14-XX Adopting Changes to the Definitions of “Unmet Transit Need” and “Reasonable to Meet”

[email protected]




RESOLUTION 14-XX

RESOLUTION ADOPTING CHANGES TO THE DEFINITIONS OF “UNMET TRANSIT NEED” AND “REASONABLE TO MEET”

WHEREAS, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is a Regional

Transportation Planning Agency, a Metropolitan Planning Organization, and the designated Council of Governments for Stanislaus County; and

WHEREAS, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is designated as the

Transportation Planning Agency with the responsibility for the allocation to claimants of funds from the Transportation Development Act (TDA); and

WHEREAS, StanCOG has a Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC),

established pursuant to Section 99238 of the TDA; and WHEREAS, the approved StanCOG Unmet Transit Need Process calls for

comprehensive review of the definitions and the process by StanCOG, the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) and other interested parties at least once every five years; and

WHEREAS, the SSTAC considered issues with the prior definitions, proposed changes,

and provided recommendations to the StanCOG Policy Board; and WHEREAS, the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC), has

reviewed the existing definitions and process, and have recommended changes to those definitions; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Stanislaus Council of Governments

adopts the recommended definitions of the term “Unmet Transit Need” and “Reasonable to Meet” as shown in Exhibit A being attached and made a part hereto; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the StanCOG Executive

Director is authorized to make any necessary administrative changes to these definitions. The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Stanislaus Council

of Governments, on the 19th day of November, 2014. A motion was made and seconded to adopt the foregoing Resolution. Motion carried and the Resolution was adopted.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2014

__________________________________________

VITO CHIESA, CHAIRMAN ATTEST:

__________________________________________ CARLOS P. YAMZON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

EXHIBIT A

Definition of Unmet Transit Need

An “unmet transit need” is a need for transportation for an individual or group of individuals within any part of Stanislaus County, which has not been funded and implemented and which has been accurately documented on the Unmet Transit Need “Request for Transit Service” form. Unmet needs include, but are not necessarily limited to, needs for traditional fixed-route transit, curb-to-curb or door-to-door paratransit service, and “door-through-door” service (trips that originate inside a building or residence and terminate inside a destination building or residence), as long as some portion of the trip is taken via a motorized vehicle having four or more wheels and operated by a professional or volunteer driver whose primary purpose is to transport individuals or groups of individuals over public rights of way. Unmet transit needs include “specialized services” that provide transportation tailored to the unique needs of the individual being served in a manner that exceeds the level of service described in the literature published by the city or county entity that provides traditional fixed-route or paratransit service to the area in which the unmet need is thought to exist. Potential transit needs may be identified by community members or through a local or regional planning process. Although, some services may be restricted or give priority to traditionally transit-dependent populations (such as elderly, youths, persons with disabilities, or low-income persons), all eligible users should have equivalent access or opportunity to use the service. At a minimum, this may include requests for transportation services which are identified through the annual TDA Unmet Transit Needs hearings, by the SSTAC, in the Regional Transportation Plan, in the Short-Range Transit Plan of any transit operator, in any study of unmet transit needs prepared or formally accepted by the StanCOG Policy Board, or in a compliance plan for the Americans with Disabilities Act as prepared by any public or private entity. Unmet transit needs are not:

1. Trips, which would duplicate transportation services 2. A need for transportation service beyond the fiscal year under consideration

Definition of Reasonable to Meet

An identified unmet transit need will be determined to be “reasonable to meet” if it is demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the StanCOG Policy Board, that the transit need can be met within the following performance and financial standards:

1. Any new service developed to meet an unmet transit need shall achieve at least 50% of the system-wide performance standards, as found in the Transit Cost Sharing Procedures adopted by the StanCOG Policy Board, except in the case of an extension of service determined to be a necessary lifeline* service for transit dependent populations.

*Lifeline Service: A service necessary to access community services within Stanislaus

County that are needed to sustain an individual’s physical and mental health, as determined by StanCOG Policy Board.

2. Any new service developed to meet an unmet transit need shall not cause the system of which it is a part to fail to meet the systemwide performance standards.

3. Any new service developed to meet an unmet transit need will not require the expenditure

of more Local Transportation Funds than are available to the jurisdiction for transit.

EXHIBIT A

4. Any new specialized service would be required to meet TDA requirements and be eligible for LTF funding under article 4 “Claims for Funds”, Article 4.5 “Claims for Community Transit Services”, and Article 8 “Other Claims for Funds”.

5. An unmet transit need that requires specialized service will not reduce the amount of

TDA funding needed by a City or County to continue to provide public transit services unless determined otherwise by the StanCOG Policy Board as demonstrated by their approval of claims submitted under article 4.5 “Claims for Community Transit Services” of the Transportation Development Act (TDA).

The determination of whether an unmet transit need is “reasonable to meet” shall take into

account as appropriate:

1. If the time period needed to implement the required corrective action (e.g. major purchases, planning requirement) is greater than one year, an unmet transit need may be declared not reasonable to meet. However, the funding must be delegated for actions necessary during the ensuing fiscal year to meet the unmet transit need during the following fiscal year. An unmet transit need shall not be determined unreasonable to meet more than once on these grounds.

2. The fact than an identified transit need cannot be fully met based on available resources

shall not be the sole reason for a finding that a transit need is not reasonable to meet.

3. StanCOG’s Policy Board determination of needs that are reasonable to meet shall not be made by comparing unmet transit needs with the need for streets and roads.






SUBJECT: Update to the StanCOG Human Services Coordination Plan

Recommendation By Motion: Recommend that the Policy Board direct staff to release a Request for Proposal (RFP), interview, select, and negotiate a contract with a consultant to update the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) Human Services Coordinated Plan. Background Pursuant to Federal transit legislation under MAP-21, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, all projects selected for funding under the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Grant (Section 5310) must be derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. In March 2008, StanCOG adopted a Public Transit – Human Services Coordination Plan (Coordinated Plan), which satisfied the requirements at that time. As part of the StanCOG Fiscal Year 2014/15 Overall Work Program, funding has been programmed to update this plan in order to ensure its compliance with current Federal legislation. Discussion: StanCOG is working in collaboration with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Division of Rail and Mass Transportation, to administer Fiscal Years 2013-15 FTA Section 5310 grant funds. Caltrans released a Call for Projects on October 1, 2014 and an application workshop was held at the StanCOG office on October 30, 2014. StanCOG is responsible for scoring applications, completing a prioritized project list for Stanislaus County, and updating the StanCOG Coordinated Plan. FTA guidance describes a strict

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 6B


requirement that all 5310 projects selected for funding must be included in a current coordinated plan. The FY 2014/15 Overall Work Program identifies an allocation of funds for StanCOG staff to update the StanCOG Coordinated Plan. In order to successfully update the Coordinated Plan, staff requires additional support and assistance from a consultant. StanCOG staff will manage and oversee the consultant contract in order to ensure that the Coordinated Plan can be utilized by the transit operators in the Stanislaus region to apply for FTA 5310 funding. Once all proposals have been evaluated, and a consultant has been selected, staff will bring the proposed consultant's contract to the Policy Board for final approval. Should you have further questions regarding this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. [email protected]





TO: Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) Staff Report Motion THROUGH: Carlos P. Yamzon, Executive Director

FROM: Cindy Malekos, Manager of Administrative Services Carla Alviso, Administrative Assistant


SUBJECT: Meeting Schedule for Calendar Year 2015

Recommendation By Motion: Approve the SSTAC meeting schedule for calendar year 2015. Background The Policy Board has a regularly scheduled public meeting date and time on the third Wednesday of the month at 6:00 pm. The Advisory Committees have regularly scheduled public meeting dates and times two weeks prior to the Policy Board meeting, during the first week of the month. All meetings are held at the StanCOG Board Room. Regularly-scheduled monthly meetings include: Policy Board Third Wednesday of month at 6:00 pm Executive Committee Monday of week prior to Policy Board

meeting @ 5:00 pm Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) First Wednesday of month at 6:00 pm Management and Finance Committee (M & F) First Wednesday of month at 3:00 pm Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) First Wednesday bi-monthly at 10:00 am Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) First Tuesday of month at 8:30 am Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) First Tuesday of month at 10:00 am Valley Vision Stanislaus (VVS) Steering Committee First Tuesday of month at 1:00 pm*

*meetings will be scheduled as needed

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 6C


Discussion There has been very good attendance at Policy Board and Committee meetings so the same monthly schedule has been used for calendar year 2015 (see attached chart). Occasional exceptions may occur due to conflicts or holidays. Advisory Committee Action The 2015 meeting schedule was reviewed by the Citizens Advisory Committee, Technical Advisory Committee, and Management and Finance Committee in November. It was requested by the TAC to switch its meeting time with the SSTAC. Since the SSTAC did not meet in November, no determination has been made. Should the SSTAC decide to change its meeting time in 2015 to 10:00 am instead of 8:30 am on the first Tuesday of the month, the attached meeting chart would be updated to reflect the change. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Cindy Malekos at 209.525.4600 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachment: StanCOG Policy Board and Committee Meetings 2015 Chart

Social Services Transportation

Advisory Council

Valley Vision Stanislaus Steering

Committee

Technical Advisory

Committee (TAC)

Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory

Committee

Management and Finance

Committee

Citizens Advisory

Committee

Executive Committee Policy Board

(1st Tuesday (1st Tuesday (1st Tuesday (1st Wednesday of (1st Wednesday (1st Wednesday (Monday of week (3rd Wednesday of the month) of the month) of the month) every other month) of the month) of the month) prior to PB mtg.) of the month)

2015 8:30 a.m. 1:00 p.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 3:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. 5:00p.m. 6:00 p.m.

January 1/6 Meetings will be 1/6 1/7 1/7 1/12 1/21

February 2/3 scheduled as needed. 2/3 2/4 2/4 2/4 2/9 2/18

March 3/3 3/3 3/4 3/4 3/9 3/18

April 3/31 * 3/31 * 4/1 4/1 4/1 4/6 4/15

May 5/5 5/5 5/6 5/6 5/11 5/20

June 6/2 6/2 6/3 6/3 6/3 6/8 6/17

July

August 8/4 8/4 8/5 8/5 8/5 8/10 8/19

September 9/1 9/1 9/2 9/2 9/8 * 9/16

October 10/6 10/6 10/7 10/7 10/7 10/12 10/21

November 11/3 11/3 11/4 11/4 11/9 11/18

December 12/1 12/1 12/2 12/2 12/2 12/7 12/16

StanCOG Policy Board & Committee Meetings

2015

No Meetings Scheduled

Unless otherwise noted, meetings are held in the StanCOG Board Room, located at 1111 "I' Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA 95354

* Please note different dates due to holidays or calendar conflicts



TO: Social Services Transportation Advisory Council Staff Report (SSTAC) Discussion THROUGH: Carlos P. Yamzon, Executive Director



SUBJECT: Caltrans Low Carbon Transit Operations Program

Background The Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) is one of several programs that are part of the Transit, Affordable Housing, and Sustainable Communities Program established by the California Legislature in 2014 by Senate Bill 862. The LCTOP was created as a statewide formulaic program to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve mobility, with a priority on serving disadvantaged communities. This program is funded by auction proceeds from the California Air Resource Board’s Cap-and-Trade Program established by Assembly Bill 32, with proceeds deposited into the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Statewide, the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program will receive $25 million in 2014-15 and 5 percent will be continuously appropriated annually beginning in 2015-16. Discussion: Working with the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA), Caltrans gathered input from local agencies and the public to develop draft LCTOP guidelines describing the process recipient transit agencies must follow to qualify and receive a share of the funds. Once final LCTOP Guidelines are adopted, Caltrans will invite eligible transit agencies to submit projects for Caltrans review. Caltrans, in consultation with California Air Resources Board (ARB), will determine whether proposed projects are eligible for funding before authorizing the State Controller’s Office (SCO) to release the funds to the project sponsors. Approved projects for the LCTOP will support new or expanded bus or rail services, expand intermodal transit facilities, and may include equipment acquisition, fueling, maintenance and other costs to operate those services or facilities, with each project reducing greenhouse gas emissions. For agencies whose service area includes disadvantaged communities, at least 50

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 6D


percent of the total moneys received shall be expended on projects that will benefit disadvantaged communities. The California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) has identified the disadvantaged communities eligible for this program based on geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard criteria. Attached is a map of Stanislaus County identifying the disadvantaged communities in the region. Below is the anticipated timeline for LCTOP Funding: 2014-15 Caltrans Releases Draft Guidelines November 7, 2014

SCO Releases Notification of Funding Available to Transit Operators December 1, 2014

Caltrans Releases Interim Final Guidelines December 19, 2014

Transit Operators Submit Project Proposals February 1, 2015

Caltrans and ARB Submit Approved Projects to SCO April 1, 2015

SCO Releases Approved Funds to Recipients April 15, 2015

2015-16 and Continuous Caltrans notifies SCO of Estimated Amount Available for the LCTOP July 10th (or within 10

days of budget enactment)

SCO Releases Notification of Funding Available for the Fiscal Year to Transit Operators

September 1st (or within 60 days of Caltrans notification)

Transit Operators Submit Projects Proposals November 1st (or 60 days after SCO notification)

Caltrans and ARB Submit Approved Projects to SCO January 15th

SCO Releases Approved Funds to Recipients February 15th

Upon further guidance, staff will convene a meeting with the local agencies and public transit operators to determine the distribution of StanCOG's FY 2014-15 apportionment of LCTOP funds after the SCO releases the Notification of Funding on December 1, 2014. Should you have any questions regarding this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachments:

1. Caltrans Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Fact Sheet 2. Map of CalEPA’s Designated Disadvantaged Communities in the Stanislaus Region

[email protected]



Low Carbon Transit Operations Program

Fact Sheet Background and Funding: The Low Carbon Transit Operations Program is one of several programs funded as part of 2014-15 State of California budget (by Senate Bill 852 and Senate Bill 862) which have a goal of reduced greenhouse gas emissions and achievement of other benefits. These programs are funded by auction proceeds from the California Air Resource Board’s Cap-and-Trade Program, with proceeds deposited into the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. The following chart lists the programs funded by revenues in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, and the amount of each program’s funding in 2014-15, and as an ongoing share of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds, where applicable. The Low Carbon Transit Operations Program will receive $25 million in 2014-15 and 5 percent will be continuously appropriated annually beginning in 2015-16.

Category Department Program 2014-15 On-going

High-Speed Rail Authority High-Speed Rail Project $250 m 25%

Sustainable Communities and Clean Transportation

State Control Office/Caltrans Low Carbon Transit Operations Program $25 m 5%

CalSTA/ Caltrans Transit and Intercity Rail

Capital Program $25 m 10%

Strategic Growth Council Affordable Housing and

Sustainable Communities Program

$130 m 20%

Air Resources Board Low Carbon Transportation $200 m

Energy Efficiency and Clean Energy

Dept. of Community Services and Development

Energy efficiency Upgrades/Weatherization $75 m

Energy Commission Energy Efficiency for Public

Buildings $20 m

Dept. of Food and Agriculture Agricultural Energy and

Operational Efficiency $ 15 m

Natural Resources and Waste Diversion

Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Wetlands and Watershed Restoration $25 m

Dept. of Forestry and Fire protection

Fire Prevention and Urban Forestry Projects $42 m

Cal Recycle Waste Diversion $25 m

Legislative History: Prior legislation established state goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and created tools to achieve these reductions.

Assembly Bill 32 (2006) set greenhouse gas reduction targets and authorized the Cap-and-Trade Program at the Air Resources Board

Senate Bill 375 (2008) and Senate Bill 391 (2009) require sustainable communities strategies be included in regional transportation plans and the statewide transportation plan

Assembly Bill 3034 (2008) placed Proposition 1A before voters, which provides bond funding to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through rail investments, including the high-speed rail project

Program Goals and Eligible Projects: Senate Bill 862 created the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program and describes program goals and eligible projects. Approved projects will support new or expanded bus or rail services, or expanded intermodal transit facilities, and may include equipment acquisition, fueling, and maintenance and other costs to operate those services or facilities, with each project reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Disadvantaged-Community Benefits: Legislation Passed in 2011, Senate Bill 535, requires that programs funded from revenues in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund result in benefits to disadvantaged communities. The designation of “disadvantaged communities” is assigned to the California Environmental Protection Agency, and the establishment of guidelines for qualifying expenditures is assigned to the California Air Resources Board. The Low Carbon Transit Operations Program will target grants so that at least 50 percent of project expenditures will benefit disadvantaged communities in agencies that include communities designated as disadvantaged. Program Guidelines and Public Input: Senate Bill 862 directs the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), in coordination with the State Air Resources Board, to develop guidelines describing methodologies to meet criteria for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. Public workshops to receive input prior to the development of guidelines are being held in August. Caltrans will also present draft guidelines for review by the Strategic Growth Council. Roles and Responsibilities of State Agencies: Caltrans, in coordination with the Air Resources Board, shall determine the eligibility of the proposed project based on the documentation provided by the recipient transit agency to ensure compliance with the guidelines. Caltrans will then notify the State Controller of approved expenditures for each transit agency, and the amount of the allocation for each agency determined to be available at the time of approval. Timeline: The Administration will release draft guidelines for comment in the fall of 2014, with guidelines finalized and review of projects funding allocation for projects planned in the first half of calendar year 2015.

Questions or comments may be directed to the Division of Rail and Mass Transportation at (916)653-3060.

Written comments on LCTOP may be directed to [email protected].

"f~ ~

_,~on:

- .... -...

November 1 0, 2014

- SB535_DACs

SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities

0

0

l e_Grand

1:577,791

5 10 20 mi

10 20

' ', , \ , " ,_ ......

40 km

Sources: Es ri. HER E. DeLorme. Tom Tom. lntermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FA O. NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase. IG N, Kadas:ter NL, Ordnance Survey, Esr i Japan, MET I. Esri Chi na (Hong Kong), slfJ.Iisstopo, Mapmylndia, @ OpenStreetMap contributors . and the G IS User Community

INFORMATION

ITEMS



TO: Social Services Transportation Advisory Council Staff Report (SSTAC) Information THROUGH: Carlos P. Yamzon, Executive Director



SUBJECT: Call for Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-15 FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Grant Funds

Background Pursuant to MAP-21, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is working in collaboration with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Division of Rail and Mass Transportation, to administer Fiscal Years 2013-15 FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program grant funds. The FTA 5310 grant program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services. Discussion: For Fiscal Years 2013-15, the State of California is receiving approximately $13 million in 5310 apportionments from the FTA for eligible projects. At least 55% of program funds must be used on capital projects that are public transportation projects planned, designed, and carried out to meet the special needs of seniors and individuals with disabilities when public transportation is insufficient, inappropriate, or unavailable. The remaining 45% may be used for: public transportation projects that exceed the requirements of the ADA, public transportation projects that improve access to fixed-route service and decrease reliance by individuals with disabilities on complementary paratransit, and alternatives to public transportation that assist seniors and individuals with disabilities. Eligible applicants that may apply for these funds include states or local government agencies, private non-profit organizations, or operators of public transportation.

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 8A


StanCOG is responsible for scoring applications and completing a prioritized project list for Stanislaus County in accordance with FTA Circular C9070.1G and the 5310 Ineligible Expenses Lists. The projects selected will be submitted to Caltrans for further statewide competition. Application and scoring evaluation materials for the selection of eligible projects for FY 2013-15 Section 5310 grant funds are available at the StanCOG website at www.StanCOG.org. Applications were due to StanCOG by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, December 1, 2014. Staff sent an email reminder regarding the application due date to the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) members on Monday, November 24, 2014. Should you have any questions regarding these funding programs, the application materials, or this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachments:

1. FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Federal Fiscal Years 2013 & 2014 Program Fact Sheet and Timeline

[email protected]

http://www.stancog.org/



11/25/2014 Page 1of 2

FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Federal Fiscal Years 2013 & 2014

PROGRAM FACT SHEET AND TIMELINE New Program: On June 6, 2014, the FTA C 9070.1G circular was finalized. The new 5310 Program has two types of projects: Traditional 5310 projects that comprise at least 55% of the available funding; and Expanded 5310 Projects that comprise at the most 45% of available funding.

Program Purpose: Provide capital and operating grants for projects that meet the transportation needs of seniors and individuals with disabilities: where public mass transportation services are otherwise unavailable, insufficient or inappropriate; that exceed the requirements of the ADA; that improve access to fixed-route service; that provide alternatives to public transportation.

Eligible Applicants: * Private non-profit corporations (Traditional and

Expanded); * Public agencies where no private non-profits are

readily available to provide the proposed service (Traditional projects);

* Public agencies that have been approved by the State to coordinate services (Traditional projects);

* Public agencies (Expanded projects); * An Operator of Public Transportation that

receives a Section 5310 grant indirectly through a recipient (Expanded projects).

Eligible Equipment: * Accessible vans and buses; * Mobile radios and communication equipment; * Computer hardware and software Vehicle Replacement Eligibility: Vehicle(s) must be in active service. Active service is defined as a vehicle providing service throughout the agency’s normal days and hours of operation. A replacement

bus(s) or van must meet or exceed useful life at the time of application.

Service Expansion Eligibility: Applicants must be able to document that the proposed transportation service will provide: * Services to additional persons; or * Expand the service area or hours; or * Increase the number and/or frequency of trips.

Eligible Mobility Management Activities: Include, but are not limited to: * Planning, development, implementation of

coordinated transportation services; * Travel training/trip planning.

Eligible Operating Activities: Include, but are not limited to: * Expansion of hours/service of paratransit

service beyond the requirements of ADA; * Enhancement of services (same day; etc.) * New or expansion of Volunteer Driver

Programs.

Funding Selection Process: 1. The Regional Transportation Planning Agency

(RTPA) scores the applications using established evaluation criteria and completes a prioritized list for their region.

2. The State Review Committee reviews the RTPA scores, and scores a statewide-prioritized list of projects based on available funding.

3. The California Transportation Commission (CTC) holds a public hearing to review and adopt the final list of projects.

4. Caltrans submits approved projects to the FTA.

Program Requirements: Once approved by FTA, successful applicants enter into a Standard Agreement with Caltrans. The agreement remains in effect until the project’s useful life; or for mobility management or operating projects, the Standard Agreement duration. Grantees are responsible for the proper use, operating costs, and maintenance of all project equipment. Grantees must be prepared to comply with the requirements of Caltrans, the Department of Motor Vehicle and the regulations of the California Highway Patrol.

Funds Available * Approximately $13 million in Federal funds

are available for these combined cycles; * 100 % in federal funds upon FTA approval of

Transportation Development Credits.

11/25/2014 Page 2of 2

5310 PROGRAM TIMELINE

October 1, 2014 - Call for Projects

- Begin Schedule for Public Hearings (Public Transit Only)

Oct. 28 – Nov. 5, 2014

- Grant Application Workshops

December 1, 2014 - Regional applications due to RTPA by 5:00 p.m. December 1, 2014. RTPA scores applications and conducts appropriate public hearings.

February 2, 2015 - RTPA forwards (electronically) regional prioritized list with scores and copies of applications with approved Certification and Assurances to Caltrans by 5:00 p.m. February 2, 2015.

March, 2015 - Regional scores are merged into a statewide-prioritized list of projects.

- State Review Committee reviews and verifies scores submitted by the RTPAs.

June 2015 - Submit draft list to CTC for book item at the upcoming CTC meeting

- CTC distributes public draft Program of Projects (POP) - CTC conducts staff level conference for the review committee to hear any

filed appeals - CTC conducts public hearing to adopt final POP - Final POP distributed publicly - Projects are programmed in the FTIP (immediately)

November 2015 - Schedule Successful Applicant Workshops, verify new agency information - After verification that all projects have been programmed, approved POP

submitted to FTA for funding approval - After FTA’s final approval, Standard Agreement process initiated - Procurement process begins.

February 2016 - Write Standard Agreements

For additional information call our toll free number (1.888.472.6816) or visit our website at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/MassTrans/5310.html

PROGRAM NOTE: FTA Section 5310 vehicles are purchased by Caltrans using a State procurement process. Upon Caltrans approval, public agencies may follow their own local procurement process. However, the grantee must comply with state and federal procurement procedures when purchasing with local funds. Upon project completion, the grantee requests reimbursement from Caltrans for the Federal Share.






SUBJECT: Distribution of FY 2014/15 Proposition 1B - PTMISEA Funds Allocation in the Amount of $5,463,529

Background Created by Proposition 1B, the Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) Program is part of a comprehensive, voter-approved transportation bond investment package designed to help advance important goals and policies, including protecting the environment and public health, conserving energy, reducing congestion, and providing alternative mobility and access options for Californians. Pursuant to this program, State Transit Assistance (STA) recipients, which are determined by the State Controller's Office, are direct recipients of PTMISEA funds. Modesto Area Express (MAX), Stanislaus Regional Transit (StaRT), and Bus Line Service of Turlock (BLST) are direct recipients of PTMISEA funds under Government Code 8879.55(a)(3) and Public Utilities Code 99314. StanCOG is the direct recipient for PTMISEA funds under Government Code 8879.55(a)(2) and Public Utilities Code 99313 for the entire Stanislaus region. For FY 2014/15, StanCOG received a total of $5,463,529 in PTMISEA funds for distribution to the region. Pursuant to the program guidelines, PTMISEA funding is available for transit capital projects in the following categories:

1. Rehabilitation, safety, or modernization: includes purchase of equipment (such as bus engines, computer systems, and signage) for rehabilitation, operation, modernization, or safety.

2. Capital service enhancement or expansion, such as modernization of bus shelters, transit centers, and operation and maintenance facilities, for design and/or construction phases.

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 8B


3. New capital projects: new construction, expansion, or modernization of buildings, bus shelters, transit centers, and operation and maintenance facilities, for design, right-of -way, or construction phases.

4. Bus rapid transit improvements: construction or expansion of BRT lanes or equipment.

5. Rolling stock: purchase, replace or rehabilitate transit vehicles, such as buses, vans, paratransit vehicles, and rail transit vehicles.

Environmental work is not eligible for PTMISEA funding. Discussion StanCOG was notified by Caltrans on October 20, 2014 of the upcoming deadline of December 5, 2014 for PTMISEA allocation requests. Staff met with the region's public transit operators on November 4, 2014, to determine the distribution of StanCOG's FY 2014/15 apportionment of PTMISEA funds. Through a collaborative effort and consensus among the transit operators, a Project Allocation List has been established, which is identified in Table 1 below. This list identifies the eligible projects being requested.

Table 1: Distribution of FY 2014/15 PTMISEA Funds Allocation (FY 2014/15 PTMISEA Project Allocation List)

Agency Project Prop 1B Amount Modesto Fareboxes (22) $242,000

New Buses $1,431,461

Refurbish Buses $634,617

Subtotal $2,308,078

Stanislaus County New Buses (3) $1,800,000

Paratransit Buses (3) $500,000

AVL System $90,000

Bus Stop Signage $129,951

Subtotal $2,519,951

Turlock Bus Stop Improvements $150,000

Bus Parking Expansion $250,000

Subtotal $400,000

Ceres Bus Shelters (11) $159,500

Bus Benches (19) $25,100


Bus Pad Improvements (15) $18,000

Bus Stop Solar Lights (8) $7,900

Odyssey Test Simulator (1) $15,000

Automated Farebox Cards (Bulk) $10,000

Subtotal $235,500

Grand Total $5,463,529 For this apportionment cycle, the City of Modesto requests approximately 42% ($2,303,078) of the funds allocated to the region; Stanislaus County requests approximately 46% ($2,519,951) of the regional allocation, the City of Turlock requests approximately 7% ($400,000) of the regional allocation, and the City of Ceres requests approximately 4% ($235,500) of the regional allocation. The StanCOG Policy Board approved the PTMISEA Project Allocation List via Resolution 14-16 at the November 19, 2014 meeting. This will be used to submit allocation requests due to Caltrans by December 5, 2014 to be funded with Spring 2015 bond sales. Should you have any questions regarding these funding programs, the application materials, or this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachments:

1. Signed Resolution 14-16 Approving the Distribution of FY 2014/15 Proposition 1B - PTMISEA Funds Allocation in the Amount of $5,463,529

[email protected]




RESOLUTION 14-16

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DISTRIBUTION OF FY 2014/15 PROPOSITION 1BPUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MODERNIZATION IMPROVEMENT AND SERVICE

ENHANCEMENT ACCOUNT (PTMISEA) FUNDS ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,463,529

WHEREAS, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency, a Metropolitan Planning Organization, and the designated Council of Govemments for Stanislaus County; and

WHEREAS, the Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) is part of a comprehensive voter-approved transportation bond investment package designed to help advance impotiant goals and policies, including protecting the environment and public health, conserving energy, reducing congestion, and providing altemative mobility and access choices for Californians. Projects funded from Fiscal Year 2014/15 PTMISEA funds will help advance the State ' s policy goals of providing mobility choices for all residents, reducing congestion, and protecting the environment; and

WHEREAS, StanCOG has been appointed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) as the designated recipient for the distribution of PTMISEA grant program funds of approximately $5,463,529 in Fiscal Year 2014/15; and

WHEREAS, StanCOG, in collaboration with and from consensus of the region's transit managers, developed a PTMISEA Project Allocation List, identified in Exhibit A Table 1, which consists of PTMISEA eligible projects that have been requested by the region's public transit operators; and

WHEREAS, StanCOG must comply with all conditions and requirements set forth in the Certification and Assurances document and applicable statutes, regulation and guidelines for all PTMISEA funded transit programs; and

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the StanCOG Policy Board approves the distribution of FY 2014/15 Proposition 1 B - PTMISEA funds allocation in the amount of $5,463,529, as identified in Exhibit A Table 1.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Policy Board authorizes the StanCOG Executive Director to execute all required documents and any amendments thereto of the PTMISEA program to the California Department of Transportation to effectuate the allocations identified in Exhibit A Table 1.

The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Stanislaus Council of Governments, on the 19th day of November 2014. A motion was made and seconded to adopt the foregoing Resolution. Motion canied and the Resolution was adopted.

MEETING DATE: November 19,2014

\JJk~ VITO CHIESA, CHAIRM~

Agency

Modesto

Table 1: Distlibution ofFY 2014/15 PTMISEA Funds Allocation (FY 2014/15 PTMISEA Project Allocation List)

Project Prop 1B Amount

Fareboxes (22)

New Buses

Refurbish Buses

Subtotal

Stanislaus County New Buses (3)

Paratransit Buses (3)

AVLSystem

Bus Stop Signage

Subtotal

Turlock Bus Stop Improvements

Bus Parking Expansion

Subtotal

Ceres Bus Shelters (11)

Bus Benches (19)

Bus Pad Improvements (15)

Bus Stop Solar Lights (8)

Odyssey Test Simulator (1)

Automated Farebox Cards (Bulk)

Subtotal

Grand Total

Exhibit A

$242,000

$1,431,461

$634,617

$2,308,078

$1,800,000

$500,000

$90,000

$129,951

$2,519,951

$150,000

$250,000

$400,000

$159,500

$25,100

$18,000

$7,900

$15,000

$10,000

$235,500

$5,463,529






SUBJECT: Commute Connection Monthly Reports – October 2014

Background Commute Connection is the transportation demand management (TDM) program for the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG). As a designated non-attainment region, the Commute Connection program serves as Stanislaus County’s transportation control measure that satisfies the mitigation measure requirements contained in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s air quality plan. Implementing this program also allows the Stanislaus region to receive approximately seven million dollars ($7,000,000) annually in federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. Discussion: Commute Connection has served as the TDM program for Stanislaus County since 1987. Commute Connection provides the following services for StanCOG:

• Rideshare matching; • Vanpool formation, subsidies and maintenance; • Employer and commuter outreach promotions and education; • Emergency Ride Home Program; and • Marketing of services to the commuting public and employers.

During the month of October, 357 residents/employees from Stanislaus County participated in Rideshare Week. Commute Connection hosted Rideshare Week site exhibits at Parker Hannifin, the City of Modesto/Stanislaus County building, and Golden Valley Health Center. Lastly, the Stanislaus County Rideshare Week Corporate Challenge Winner was Parker Hannifin.

dtrujillo

Typewritten Text

Item 8C


Should you have further questions regarding this staff report, please contact Regina Valentine at 209-525-4644 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Attachments:

1. Commute Connection’s October 2014 Monthly Report

[email protected]



THE MONTHLY REPORT

October, 2014 San Joaquin / Stanislaus / Merced

2014 RIDESHARE

WEEK BREAKS

RECORD! 2014 was a great year breaking the record for participation to 1,042! This represents a 74% increase

over last year. Of course this could not be accomplished without the dedication of employers to promote

the event and encourage employees as well as the commuters who choose to make a difference.

Participants by County Corporate Challenge Winners

San Joaquin - 510

Stanislaus - 357

Merced - 175

Pacific Coast Producers

Parker Hannifin

City of Merced

A Day in the Life of a Commuter

His name is Ken. Ken has been commuting to Santa Clara from

Patterson since he moved from Chicago. He makes the trek because of the quality of life he wanted for him

and his family. It’s a quick drive to the Tracy ACE station and he feels good about helping the environment.

Then there was Ed. Ed has been a loyal ACE rider since the third day of service, and was taking his

last train ride home after 15 years as a loyal passenger, having retired that very day. His fellow riders brought

pizza, cake and drinks onto the train to celebrate – they explained that they’d truly formed a commuter fam-

ily after all the time they’d sent on the train together.

In an effort to stay current on alternative transportation and services, out-

reach staff joined community leaders and representatives from Merced to

San Joaquin County on an ACE train tour to San Jose in October. After

learning about the ACE expansion plans and great services, staff set out to

find out more about the commuters……

San Joaquin

Merced

Stanislaus

Commute Connection / 555 E. Weber Avenue / Stockton, CA / 800-52-SHARE / commuteconnection.com

A Program of the San Joaquin Council of Governments, Stanislaus Council of Governments

and Merced County Association of Governments

October Activities & Outreach

RSW Site Exhibit at Parker Hannifin

RSW Site Exhibit for City of Modesto and Stanislaus County

RSW Site Exhibit at Golden Valley Health Center

Attended State of the Region Economic Development Conference in Modesto

Tri-County

Released TDM RFP and responded to proposer questions

Met with TDM System Selection Consultant

Established proposal review and interview panel for TDM System

Launched Rideshare Week

Finalized MOU with MTC for Rideshare Database Sharing

Sent RSW Emails to 412 contacts in employer network

Completed park and ride lot usage survey

Worked on MOU for NTD Reporting with SJRTD

Worked on TDM Interregional Action Plan with SACOG

Attended San Joaquin Green Team Meeting, FRESH Launch Meeting

RSW Site Exhibit at City of Lodi

UOP RSW Site Exhibit

Site Exhibit at Kaiser Permanente Live Well Festival

Meeting with Safeway Distribution Center, Amazon Fulfillment Center in Tracy

Presentation to CBC Steel Buildings RSW Raffle Prize Winner

REACON Meeting with Central Plastics Manufacturing

RSW Site Exhibit at City of Merced

RSW Site Exhibit at Merced Public Works

RSW Site Exhibit at Golden Valley Health Center

RSW Site Exhibit at Hilmar Cheese Company

Commute Connection Annual Report Presentation to MCAG Governing Board

Rideshare Database Profile Total Registered Commuters Commuters Added Total Vanpools Vanpools Added

San Joaquin 5,474 13 104 0

Stanislaus 2,182 8 31 0

Merced 349 12 6 0

city of hughson city of modesto city of newman city of oakdale … · 2014-12-02 · kari mcnickle...

Documents