ci pac 1 anglais nobel obama

Upload: simon-uzenat

Post on 30-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Ci Pac 1 Anglais Nobel Obama

    1/2

    The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Barack Obama Page 1 English version

    A symbolic injunctionThe Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Barack Obama

    By Josepha LarocheTranslation: Emily Normand

    The 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama has been

    awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, by the Nobel Committee, on Friday, October 9th 2009. This

    decision has surprised a large number of experts, while amongst more than two hundred

    nominees, they rather expected the Prime Minister of Zimbabwe, Morgan Tsvangirai, or else a

    Chinese human rights activist. Numerous voices, such as Prize-winner (1983) Lech Walesa, thus

    rose to stress that he had not had the time to do anything!".

    Historical reminder

    It is the third time that a US President in office is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize

    established in 1901. Indeed, in 1906, the Norwegian Committee had awarded it to the republican

    Theodore Roosevelt (1905-1909) to recognize his mediation in the Russian-Japanese war of

    1905. Then in 1919, it was the turn of the democrat Thomas Woodrow Wilson (two mandates

    1913-1921) to see his efforts in favor of the creation of the League of Nations rewarded.

    Theoretical frame

    This award highlights:

    1 The building and expression of a diplomatic policy by a non State actor in this case theNobel Committee and its capacity to impact the world scene.2 The conversion of a symbolic resource the Prize into a political instrument.Analysis

    Without wanting to appear provocative, I would say that it is precisely because he has

    done nothing yet that President Obama has received the Nobel Peace Prize.

    Since his recent election, he has essentially given speeches which marked a total rupture

    with the policy of his predecessor, the republican George Bush. But although he had not had

    time to perform them, he has already shifted the main lines of the foreign policy of the United

    States and restored the image of his country all around the world. In particular, let me remind

    you that:

    1 He has abandoned the antimissile shield project previously denounced by Russia which should have been deployed in Poland.

    2 He has asserted his commitment to fight against global warming.3 He is in favor of a dialog between cultures, particularly with the whole Muslim world.4 Finally and more still, that he has indicated how much nuclear disarmament in the worldwould count among his main objectives.

    First of all, let us stress that these speeches are more than simple speeches. Indeed,

    insofar as he is the President of the first world power, it is clear that we are dealing with a

    performative speech, that is to say with a power setting word, producer in itself of reality. In other

    words, by the mere fact that this speech is given, it becomes by itself, a generator of practical

    L'actualit internationale en note critique

    Pour une analyse transnationaliste

    de la scne mondiale

    N1 Version anglaise www.chaos-international.org

    Passage au crible

  • 8/14/2019 Ci Pac 1 Anglais Nobel Obama

    2/2

    The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Barack Obama Page 2 English version

    effects: this is really not a thing of none importance. It is obvious that the Nobel Committee has

    particularly taken this fact into account.

    Besides this consideration, it should be well understood that the Nobel Foundation

    through its system of prizes conducts a non State diplomacy perfectly in line with the terms left

    by Alfred Nobel in his will. Thus, by awarding all its prizes, it continues to mark the international

    scene with its imprint and strongly influence the policies of the States in accordance with its

    orientations. Indeed, since its creation, that is to say for more than a century it has defined acertain number of priorities, as international stakes which it then sought to put on the agenda.

    These deal with 1) the defense of human rights, and with 2) certain political issues to

    which it intends to bring in the long term and by a policy of global allocation , its pledge and

    its support. In this respect, let us recall that in the past, it has for example encouraged the policy

    of East/West Detente, through Prize-winners such as Willy Brandt, Lech Walesa, or Michael

    Gorbatchev. In the same logic, it has supported the fight against Apartheid and racism with

    prizes awarded respectively to John Lutuli, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela and Frederik de

    Klerk. Furthermore, it has also developed a line dedicated to protecting the environment with

    the election in 2004 of the Kenyan, Wangari Muta Maathai, then in 2007, those of Al Gore and

    the GIEC Intergovernmental Group of Experts on the Climate change. Finally, it has constantlyworked to promote disarmament in general and nuclear disarmament in particular. As such, we

    shall mention the election of Joseph Rotblat and the Pugwash Movement on Science and World

    Affairs, for the year 1995, while the International Atomic Energy Agency and its Director

    Mohamed El Baradei were rewarded with the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005.

    Regarding President Obama, it is certain that the Nobel Committee does not intend to

    reward his policy, a fortiorinot to honor a course of excellence. So much, so that Barack Obama

    was president for only eleven days, when submission of the nominations was closed. In fact, with

    this award and all splendors attached to it, the Nobel Committee has chosen to distinguish

    especially the U.S. President among the other heads of State by conferring him an extra world

    legitimacy. Since then, he has become the custodian of the Nobel aura and its values. Now,President Obama incarnates a universal project which transcends him. He embodies from now

    on the Nobel diplomacy instead of being simply the architect of the American diplomacy.

    Far from to be a "politically correct" decision, as it has been said and written, this award

    reflects instead an important risk-taking of the Norwegian Committee. More than ever, it

    commits here all its credit both symbolically and institutionally. This prize must thus be analyzed

    as a symbolic coup of the Nobel system. It must be understood as an investment, a symbolic

    downpayment on the politics of the new head of the American State. This prize constrains

    Barack Obama: it is somehow a way to take him on his word and force him to accomplish all on

    which he has committed himself.

    References

    Laroche Josepha, Les Prix Nobel, Paris, PUF, 2005. Exhausted, will be republished soon.

    Fant Kenne,Alfred Nobel, a Biography, New York, Arcade, 1993.

    Wade Nicholas, La Course au Nobel, trad., Paris, Messinger, 1981.