chis 2018 data dictionary - ucla center for health policy

CHIS 2018 DATA DICTIONARY

tǳōƭƛŎ ¦ǎŜ CƛƭŜ όt¦Cύ Data Dictionary

Child

October 2019

CHIS 2018 DATA DICTIONARY

Child Survey

Public Use File (PUF)

October 2019

child.sas7bdat

Contact:

California Health Interview Survey

UCLA Center for Health Policy Research

10960 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1550

Los Angeles, CA 90024

Email: [email protected]

Copyright © 2019 The Regents of the University of California. All Rights Reserved.

mailto:[email protected]

Suggested Citation:

California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2018 Child Survey. UCLA Center for Health Policy

Research. Los Angeles, CA: October 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction ............................................................................... 2

1.1 CHIS 2018 Child Survey Data File ......................................................................... 2

1.2 Accompanying Files ................................................................................................ 2

2. What’s New in CHIS 2018 ....................................................... 3

3. CHIS 2018 Sample Design and Methodology ........................ 6

1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................. 6

1.2 Switch to a Continuous Survey ............................................................................... 7

1.3 Sample Design Objectives ....................................................................................... 8

1.4 Data Collection ...................................................................................................... 12

1.5 Response Rates ...................................................................................................... 18

1.6 Weighting the Sample ........................................................................................... 18

1.7 Imputation Methods ............................................................................................... 22

4. Sample Code for Analysis and Pooling of CHIS Data .......... 24

5. Restricted Variables ................................................................ 25

6. CHIS Data Dictionary ............................................................ 26

Click on the “Bookmarks” icon to navigate between sections

of the data dictionary:

1-2

1. Introduction

1.1 CHIS 2018 Child Survey Data File

The 2018 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS 2018) Child Data File consists of individual records

obtained from the 2018 data collection period of the CHIS 2017-2018 Child survey.

The UCLA-Center for Health Policy Research (UCLA-CHPR) is responsible for maintaining consistent

standards to protect respondent confidentiality as specified in approved protocols by the UCLA IRB

(IRB# 17-000362) and the California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (12-05-0176).

Organizations that receive CHIS data are required to complete a data use agreement with UCLA-

CHPR. The data files listed below must be maintained in accordance with the provisions of the data use

agreement between the recipient and UCLA-CHPR. In order to protect respondent confidentiality,

UCLA-CHPR maintains the most confidential and sensitive CHIS data only in its files at the Data Access

Center (DAC) located at UCLA-CHPR. Researcher access to confidential data, including respondent

latitude and longitude, is available by application to the DAC. For more information, please contact

[email protected]. Limited technical assistance is also available from CHIS – please send email to

[email protected].

1.2 Accompanying Files

In addition to the data file are several accompanying files that facilitate use of the data file; some

are not necessary for data analysis but add convenience in utilizing the main data.

a. Data file: CHILD.SAS7BDAT, CHILD.SAV, CHILD.DTA

b. Proc format file: CHILD_PROC_FORMAT.SAS

c. Format file: CHILD_FORMAT.SAS

d. Label file: CHILD_LABEL.SAS

e. Imputation flag file: CHILDF.SAS7BDAT, CHILDF.SAV, CHILDF.DTA

f. Others: CHILD.XPT, CHILDF.XPT

CHIS 2018 PUF Child Data Dictionary child.sas7bdat



1-3

2. What’s New in CHIS 2018

This document describes new and notable design features and data collected in CHIS 2017-2018.

CHIS data users should review the information below and detailed online documentation before

analyzing or reporting CHIS data. For more documentation on CHIS methods, please visit

chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/methodology.aspx

New and Updated Survey Questions

Survey questions are added, removed, and modified in each two-year cycle of CHIS to meet

stakeholders’ needs and monitor emerging public health concerns. Questions are removed from

the interview to reduce its length and save data collection costs when topics are no longer

relevant for public health surveillance, or when sponsor funding is no longer available. Most

CHIS questions remain in the interview across CHIS cycles.

For CHIS 2017-2018 approximately 80% of the content continued from CHIS 2016.

Occasionally, changes to question wording are made based on methodological evaluations or

when user feedback strongly suggests that changes will produce better data. Otherwise, questions

are consistent across years to aid in trending. Reinstated questions were asked in cycles prior to

2015-2016, and again in 2017-2018.

New Adult Questionnaire Topics in 2017-2018

Marijuana use1, frequency and methods of use1,4

Female pregnancy intentions1

Male birth control use1

Voting eligibility and engagement1

Current WIC enrollment2, WIC participation in the past 5 years1 and satisfaction with

WIC3

Prescription drug misuse2 and heroin use2

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis3

Reinstated content:

o Smoking cessation1

o Current birth control use and pregnancy

o status1

o Race most identified with1

o Paying off mortgage and loan1 (used in

o creation of the Elder Index™)

o Medical debt1

o Usage of health savings accounts1

New Adult Questionnaire Topics in 2018

Non-cigarette tobacco use1

Tobacco product and e-cigarette flavors1

Secondhand smoke exposure1 and rules about smoking/vaping1

Well-being scale1


chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/methodology.aspx

1-4

New Child Questionnaire Topics in 2017-2018

Reinstated content:

o Prescription medication and therapy needs1

o Developmental concerns1

o Usage of public dental health programs1

New Teen Questionnaire Topics in 2017-2018

Sleep and technology use1

Marijuana use2, frequency of use2 and methods of use3

Birth control use and counseling2

New Teen Questionnaire Topics in 2018

Reinstated content:

o Condition of teeth1 and missed school due to dental problems1

1 Available in all CHIS data products including Public Use Files (PUFs)

2 Available through AskCHIS (ask.chis.ucla.edu)

3 Confidential data is only available through the Data Access Center (DAC). For more information please visit

chis.ucla.edu/chis/data/Pages/confidential.aspx

4 Question only available in PUF for 2018, but available through the DAC for 2017

For a full list of topics in CHIS 2017-2018, please visit chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/survey-

topics.aspx. The full CHIS 2017 and 2018 questionnaires are available at

chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/questionnairesEnglish.aspx.

Improved Sample Coverage

In an effort to improve cell phone coverage of California residents, CHIS 2017-2018 included a

sample of likely residents (based on ZIP code) with out-of-state cell phone numbers to better

capture those who have recently moved into the state. CHIS 2017-2018 also oversampled

residents under 65 years of age to increase the ability to reach households with children and

teens.

Oversamples

CHIS 2017-2018 continued to oversample Korean and Vietnamese populations which has been

done in previous cycles since CHIS 2001. For the first time ever, CHIS was able to expand the

listed sample of Korean and Vietnamese surnames to include cell phone numbers. CHIS 2017-

2018 also saw an oversample in San Diego County thanks to funds provided by San Diego

Health and Human Services.

In 2017, the Imperial County Health Department provided funds to oversample residents of

northern Imperial County.

In 2018, the California Rural Indian Health Board provided funds to oversample American

Indians across the state. In addition, the San Francisco Department of Public Health provided

funds to specific gender and ethnic oversamples in San Francisco County.

New Vendor


ask.chis.ucla.edu

chis.ucla.edu/chis/data/Pages/confidential.aspx

chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/survey-topics.aspx

chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/survey-topics.aspx

chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/questionnairesEnglish.aspx

1-5

As the result of a competitive bidding process, SSRS conducted the CHIS 2017-2018 data

collection under contract with the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

Data Collection Timeline

CHIS 2017-2018 data were collected between June 2017 and January 2019. Approximately half

of adult interviews were conducted from landline phone numbers and half from cell phone

numbers.

From CHIS 2011 forward, single-year data are available representing a yearly cross-section of

California’s population. Relative to the larger, two-year CHIS data files available prior to 2011,

small populations (such as child, teen or some racial/ethnic groups) or rare conditions and

characteristics will have fewer observations in the single-year data file. In such cases, pooling

two or more single-year datasets may be required to achieve sufficient sample size and statistical

stability. Users who need more information about pooling or trending data over time should

review the Analyze CHIS Data website at chis.ucla.edu/chis/analyze/Pages/default.aspx or go to

the CHIS FAQ page at chis.ucla.edu/chis/faq/Pages/default.aspx. Email questions to

[email protected].


chis.ucla.edu/chis/analyze/Pages/default.aspx

chis.ucla.edu/chis/faq/Pages/default.aspx


1-6

3. CHIS 2018 Sample Design and Methodology

1.1 Overview A series of five methodology reports are available with more detail about the methods

used in CHIS 2017-2018.

Report 1 – Sample Design;

Report 2 – Data Collection Methods;

Report 3 – Data Processing Procedures;

Report 4 – Response Rates; and

Report 5 – Weighting and Variance Estimation.

For further information on CHIS data and the methods used in the survey, visit the

California Health Interview Survey Web site at http://www.chis.ucla.edu or contact CHIS at

[email protected]. For methodology reports from previous CHIS cycles, go to

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/ methodology.aspx

The CHIS is a population-based telephone survey of California’s residential,

noninstitutionalized population conducted every other year since 2001 and continually beginning

in 2011. CHIS is the nation’s largest state-level health survey and one of the largest health

surveys in the nation. The UCLA Center for Health Policy Research (UCLA-CHPR) conducts

CHIS in collaboration with the California Department of Public Health and the California

Department of Health Care Services. CHIS collects extensive information for all age groups on

health status, health conditions, health-related behaviors, health insurance coverage, access to

health care services, and other health and health-related issues.

The sample is designed and optimized to meet two objectives:

1) Provide estimates for large- and medium-sized counties in the state, and for groups of

the smallest counties (based on population size), and

2) Provide statewide estimates for California’s overall population, its major racial and

ethnic groups, as well as several racial and ethnic subgroups.

The CHIS sample is representative of California’s non-institutionalized population living

in households. CHIS data and results are used extensively by federal and State agencies, local


http://www.chis.ucla.edu/

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/methodology.aspx

http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/methodology.aspx



1-7

public health agencies and organizations, advocacy and community organizations, other local

agencies, hospitals, community clinics, health plans, foundations, and researchers. These data are

used for analyses and publications to assess public health and health care needs, to develop and

advocate policies to meet those needs, and to plan and budget health care coverage and services.

Many researchers throughout California and the nation use CHIS data files to further their

understanding of a wide range of health related issues (visit UCLA-CHPR’s publication page at

http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/publications/Pages/default.aspx for examples of CHIS studies).

1.2 Switch to a Continuous Survey

From the first CHIS cycle in 2001 through 2009, CHIS data were collected during a 7 to

9 month period every other year. Beginning in 2011, CHIS data have been collected continually

over a 2-year cycle. This change was driven by several factors including the ability to track and

release information about health in California on a more frequent and timely basis and to

eliminate potential seasonality in the biennial data.

CHIS 2017-2018 data were collected between June 2017 and January 2019. As in

previous CHIS cycles, weights are included with the data files and are based on the State of

California’s Department of Finance population estimates and projections, adjusted to remove the

population living in group quarters (such as nursing homes, prisons, etc.) and thus not eligible to

participate in CHIS. When the weights are applied to the data, the results represent California’s

residential population during the two year period for the age group corresponding to the data file

in use (adult, adolescent, or child). In CHIS 2017-2018, data users will be able to produce single-

year estimates using the weights provided (referred to as CHIS 2017 and CHIS 2018,

respectively).

See what’s new in the 2017-2018 CHIS sampling and data collection here:

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Documents/whats-new-chis-2017-2018.pdf

In order to provide CHIS data users with more complete and up-to-date information to

facilitate analyses of CHIS data, additional information on how to use the CHIS sampling

weights, including sample statistical code, is available at

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/analyze/Pages/sample-code.aspx.


http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/publications/Pages/default.aspx

http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/publications/Pages/default.aspx

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Documents/whats-new-chis-2017-2018.pdf

http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Documents/whats-new-chis-2015-2016.pdf

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/analyze/Pages/sample-code.aspx

http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/analyze/Pages/sample-code.aspx

1-8

Additional documentation on constructing the CHIS sampling weights is available in the

CHIS

2017-2018 Methodology Series: Report 5—Weighting and Variance Estimation posted at

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/methodology.aspx. Other helpful information for

understanding the CHIS sample design and data collection processing can be found in the four

other methodology reports for each CHIS cycle year.

1.3 Sample Design Objectives The CHIS 2017-2018 sample was designed to meet the two sampling objectives

discussed above: (1) provide estimates for adults in most counties and in groups of counties with

small populations; and (2) provide estimates for California’s overall population, major racial and

ethnic groups, and for several smaller racial and ethnic subgroups.

To achieve these objectives, CHIS employed a dual-frame, multi-stage sample design.

The random-digit-dial (RDD) sample included telephone numbers assigned to both landline and

cellular service. The RDD sample was designed to achieve the required number of completed

adult interviews by using approximately 50% landline and 50% cellular phone numbers. For the

RDD sample, the 58 counties in the state were grouped into 44 geographic sampling strata, and

14 sub-strata were created within the two most populous counties in the state (Los Angeles and

San Diego). The same geographic stratification of the state has been used since CHIS 2005. The

Los Angeles County stratum included eight sub-strata for Service Planning Areas, and the San

Diego County stratum included six sub-strata for Health Service Districts. Most of the strata (39

of 44) consisted of a single county with no sub-strata (see counties 3-41 in Table 1-1). Three

multi-county strata comprised the 17 remaining counties (see counties 42-44 in Table 1-1). A

sufficient number of adult interviews were allocated to each stratum and sub-stratum to support

the first sample design objective for the two-year period—to provide health estimates for adults

at the local level. Asian surname sample list frames added 127 Korean, and 214 Vietnamese

adult interviews based on self-identified ethnicity for the 2017-2018 survey year.1 Additional

samples from both the landline and cell phone frames produced 1,375 interviews in 2017-2018

within San Diego County. In 2018, an oversample of American Indian and Alaska Native

1 For the 2017-2018, RDD landline and cell sample frames produced totals of 290 Korean, and 235 Vietnamese

adult interviews.


http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/methodology.aspx


1-9

residents of California added 317 completed interviews, and specific gender and ethnic

oversamples in San Francisco provided an additional 498 interviews. Furthermore, an address-

based sample from the USPS Delivery Sequence File produced 339 landline or cell phone

interviews in 2017 within the northern part of Imperial County.

Within each geographic stratum, residential telephone numbers were selected, and within

each household, one adult (age 18 and over) respondent was randomly selected. In those

households with adolescents (ages 12-17) and/or children (under age 12), one adolescent and one

child of the randomly selected parent/guardian were randomly selected; the adolescent was

interviewed directly, and the adult sufficiently knowledgeable about the child’s health completed

the child interview.


1-10

Table 1-1. California county and county group strata used in the CHIS 2017-2018 sample design

1. Los Angeles 7. Alameda 27. Shasta

1.1 Antelope Valley 8. Sacramento 28. Yolo

1.2 San Fernando Valley 9. Contra Costa 29. El Dorado

1.3 San Gabriel Valley 10. Fresno 30. Imperial

1.4 Metro 11. San Francisco 31. Napa

1.5 West 12. Ventura 32. Kings

1.6 South 13. San Mateo 33. Madera

1.7 East 14. Kern 34. Monterey

1.8 South Bay 15. San Joaquin 35. Humboldt

2. San Diego 16. Sonoma 36. Nevada

2.1 N. Coastal 17. Stanislaus 37. Mendocino

2.2 N. Central 18. Santa Barbara 38. Sutter

2.3 Central 19. Solano 39. Yuba

2.4 South 20. Tulare 40. Lake

2.5 East 21. Santa Cruz 41. San Benito

2.6 N. Inland 22. Marin 42. Colusa, Glenn, Tehama

3. Orange 23. San Luis Obispo 43. Del Norte, Lassen, Modoc,

4. Santa Clara 24. Placer Plumas, Sierra, Siskiyou, Trinity

5. San Bernardino 25. Merced 44. Amador, Alpine, Calaveras, Inyo,

6. Riverside 26. Butte Mariposa, Mono, Tuolumne

Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, 2017-2018 California Health Interview Survey.

The CHIS RDD sample is of sufficient size to accomplish the second objective (produce

estimates for the state’s major racial/ethnic groups, as well as many ethnic subgroups). However,

given the smaller sample sizes of one-year data files, two or more pooled cycles years of CHIS

data are generally required to produce statistically stable estimates for small population groups

such as racial/ethnic subgroups, children, teens, etc. To increase the precision of estimates for

Koreans and Vietnamese, areas with relatively high concentrations of these groups were sampled

at higher rates. These geographically targeted oversamples were supplemented by telephone

numbers associated with group-specific surnames, drawn from listed telephone directories to

increase the sample size further for Koreans and Vietnamese.


1-11

To help compensate for the increasing number of households without landline telephone

service, a separate RDD sample was drawn of telephone numbers assigned to cellular service. In

CHIS 2017-2018, the goal was to complete approximately 50% of all RDD interviews statewide

with adults contacted via cell phone. Because the geographic information available for cell phone

numbers is limited and not as precise as that for landlines, cell phone numbers were assigned to

the same 44 geographic strata (i.e., 41 strata defined by a single county and 3 strata created by

multiple counties) using a classification associated with the rate center linked to the account

activation. The cell phone stratification closely resembles that of the landline sample and has the

same stratum names, though the cell phone strata represent slightly different geographic areas

than the landline strata. The adult owner of the sampled cell phone number was automatically

selected for CHIS. Cell numbers used exclusively by children under 18 were considered

ineligible. A total of 880 teen interviews and 3,186 child interviews were completed in CHIS

2017-2018 with approximately 48% of teen interviews and 65% of child interviews coming from

the cell phone sample.

The cell phone sampling method used in CHIS has evolved significantly since its first

implementation in 2007 when only cell numbers belonging to adults in cell-only households

were eligible for sampling adults. These changes reflect the rapidly changing nature of cell

phone ownership and use in the US.2 There have been three significant changes to the cell phone

sample since 2009. First, all cell phone sample numbers used for non-business purposes by

adults living in California were eligible for the extended interview. Thus, adults in households

with landlines who had their own cell phones or shared one with another adult household

member could have been selected through either the cell or landline sample. The second change

was the inclusion of child and adolescent extended interviews. The third, enacted in CHIS 2015-

2016 was to increase the fraction of the sample comprised of cell phones from 20% to 50% of

completed interviews. In 2017-2018, we additionally sampled out-of-area cell phone numbers.

These are cell phone numbers with exchanges outside of California that can be matched to an

address that is within California, indicating that the owner of the cell phone resides in California

but purchased a cell phone in another state.

2 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201906.pdf


https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201906.pdf

1-12

The cell phone sample design and targets by stratum of the cell phone sample have also

changed throughout the cycles of the survey. In CHIS 2007, a non-overlapping dual-frame

design was implemented where cell phone only users were screened and interviewed in the cell

phone sample. Beginning in 2009, an overlapping dual-frame design has been implemented. In

this design, dual phone users (e.g., those with both cell and landline service) can be selected and

interviewed from either the landline or cellphone samples.

The number of strata has also evolved as more information about cell numbers has

become available. In CHIS 2007, the cell phone frame was stratified into seven geographic

sampling strata created using telephone area codes. In CHIS 2009 and 2011-2012, the number

of cell phone strata was increased to 28. These strata were created using both area codes and the

geographic information assigned to the number. Beginning in CHIS 2011, with the availability

of more detailed geographic information, the number of strata was increased to 44 geographic

areas that correspond to single and grouped counties similar to the landline strata. The use of 44

geographic strata continued in CHIS 2017-2018.

1.4 Data Collection To capture the rich diversity of the California population, interviews were conducted in

six languages: English, Spanish, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese dialects), Vietnamese,

Korean, and Tagalog. Tagalog interviews were conducted for part of the CHIS 2013-2014

cycle, but 2015-2016 were the first cycle years that Tagalog interviewers were conducted from

the beginning of data collection. These languages were chosen based on analysis of 2010

Census data to identify the languages that would cover the largest number of Californians in the

CHIS sample that either did not speak English or did not speak English well enough to

otherwise participate.

SSRS designed the methodology and collected data for CHIS 2017-2018, under contract

with the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. SSRS is an independent research firm that

specializes in innovative methodologies, optimized sample designs, and reaching low-incidence

populations. For all sampled households, SSRS staff interviewed one randomly selected adult in

each sampled household, and sampled one adolescent and one child if they were present in the

household and the sampled adult was their parent or legal guardian. Thus, up to three interviews

could have been completed in each household. Children and adolescents were generally sampled


1-13

at the end of the adult interview. If the screener respondent was someone other than the sampled

adult, children and adolescents could be sampled as part of the screening interview, and the

extended child (and adolescent) interviews could be completed before the adult interview. This

“child-first” procedure was first used in CHIS 2005 and has been continued in subsequent CHIS

cycles because it substantially increases the yield of child interviews. While numerous

subsequent attempts were made to complete the adult interview for child-first cases, the final

data contain completed child and adolescent interviews in households for which an adult

interview was not completed. Table 1-2 shows the number of completed adult, child, and

adolescent interviews in CHIS 2017-2018 by the type of sample (landline RDD, surname list,

cell RDD, and ABS). Note that these figures were accurate as of data collection completion for

2017-2018 and may differ slightly from numbers in the data files due to data cleaning and edits.

Sample sizes to compare against data files you are using are found online at

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/sample.aspx.

Table 1-2. Number of completed CHIS 2017-2018 interviews by type of sample and instrument

Type of sample1 Adult2 Child Adolescent

Total all samples 42,330 3,186 880

Landline RDD3 18,896 1,049 434

Cell RDD 21,554 1,996 409

Vietnamese surname list landline 188 10 5

Vietnamese surname list cell phone 80 10 3

Korean surname list landline 354 16 3

Korean surname list cell phone 56 5 1

Both Korean and Vietnamese landline 48 1 1

Imperial County ABS Oversample 339 42 15

AIAN Oversample landline 130 10 -

AIAN Oversample cell phone 187 20 3

San Francisco Oversample landline 148 4 1

San Francisco Oversample cell phone 350 23 5



http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/sample.aspx

http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/sample.aspx

1-14

1 Completed interviews listed for each sample type refer to the sampling frame from which the phone number was

drawn. Interviews could be conducted using numbers sampled from a frame with individuals who did not meet the

target criteria for the frame but were otherwise eligible residents of California. For example, only 157 of the 190

adult interviews completed from the Vietnamese surname list involved respondents who indicated being having

Vietnamese ethnicity.

2 Includes interviews meeting the criteria as partially complete.

3 Breakdown of completes by frame deviates slightly from original sample numbers due to numbers changing frames

following post-sampling database processing.

Interviews in all languages were administered using SSRS’s computer-assisted

telephone interviewing (CATI) system. The average adult interview took about 42 minutes to

complete. The average child and adolescent interviews took about 19 minutes and 24 minutes,

respectively. For “child-first” interviews, additional household information asked as part of the

child interview averaged about 14 minutes. Interviews in non-English languages typically took

longer to complete with an average length of about 50 minutes for the adult interview, 29

minutes for the teen, and 23 minutes for the child. More than eight percent of the adult

interviews were completed in a language other than English, as were about 13 percent of all

child (parent proxy) interviews and six percent of all adolescent interviews.

Table 1-3 shows the major topic areas for each of the three survey instruments (adult,

child, and adolescent). If questions were asked in only one year of survey implementation, the

specific year is indicated in the table.

Table 1-3. CHIS 2017-2018 survey topic areas by instrument

Health status Adult Teen Child

General health status

Days missed from work or school due to health problems

Health conditions Adult Teen Child

Asthma

Diabetes, gestational diabetes, pre-diabetes/borderline diabetes

Heart disease, high blood pressure

Physical disability

Physical, behavioral, and/or mental conditions

Developmental assessment, referral to a specialist by a doctor

Mental health Adult Teen Child

Mental health status


1-15

Perceived need, access and utilization of mental health services

Functional impairment, stigma, three-item loneliness scale (2017)

Suicide ideation and attempts

Health behaviors Adult Teen Child

Dietary and water intake, breastfeeding (younger than 3 years)

Physical activity and exercise

Commute from school to home

Walking for transportation and leisure (2017)

Alcohol, cigarette, and E-cigarette use

Marijuana use

Opioid use

Chewing tobacco, tobacco flavors (2018)

Exposure to second-hand smoke (2018)

Sexual behaviors

HIV testing, HIV prevention medication

Sleep and technology

Sedentary time

Contraceptive use

Table 1-3. CHIS 2017-2018 survey topic areas by instrument (continued)

Women’s health Adult Teen Child

Pregnancy status, postpartum care

Dental health Adult Teen Child

Last dental visit, main reason haven’t visited dentist

Current dental insurance coverage

Condition of teeth

Neighborhood and housing Adult Teen Child

Safety, social cohesion

Homeownership

Length of time at current residence (2017)

Park use, park and neighborhood safety

Civic engagement

Access to and use of health care Adult Teen Child

Usual source of care, visits to medical doctor

Emergency room visits

Delays in getting care (prescriptions and medical care)

Communication problems with doctor

Discrimination (2017)

Timely appointment


1-16

Access to specialist and general doctors

Tele-medical care

Care coordination (2018)

Voter engagement Adult Teen Child

Voter engagement

Food environment Adult Teen Child

Access to fresh and affordable foods

Availability of food in household over past 12 months

Hunger

Health insurance Adult Teen Child

Current insurance coverage, spouse’s coverage, who pays for coverage

Health plan enrollment, characteristics and assessment of plan

Whether employer offers coverage, respondent/spouse eligibility

Coverage over past 12 months, reasons for lack of insurance

High deductible health plans

Partial scope Medi-Cal

Medical debt, hospitalizations

Table 1-3. CHIS 2017-2018 survey topic areas by instrument (continued)

Public program eligibility Adult Teen Child

Household poverty level

Program participation (CalWORKs, Food Stamps, SSI, SSDI, WIC,

TANF)

Assets, child support, Social security/pension

Medi-Cal eligibility, Medi-Cal renewal

Reason for Medi-Cal non-participation

Bullying Adult Teen Child

Bullying, school safety

Parental involvement/adult supervision Adult Teen Child

Parental involvement

Parental support, teach support

Child care and school Adult Teen Child

Current child care arrangements

Paid child care

First 5 California: Talk, Read, Sing Program / Kit for New Parents

Preschool/school attendance, school name

Preschool quality

School instability, school programs and organizational involvement

Employment Adult Teen Child


1-17

Employment status, spouse’s employment status

Hours worked at all jobs

Industry and occupation, firm size

Income Adult Teen Child

Respondent’s and spouse’s earnings last month before taxes

Household income, number of persons supported by household income

Placement on quality of life ladder (2018)

Respondent characteristics Adult Teen Child

Race and ethnicity, age, gender, height, weight

Veteran status

Marital status, registered domestic partner status (same-sex couples)

Sexual orientation, gender identity

Gender expression

Living with parents

Education, English language proficiency

Citizenship, immigration status, country of birth, length of time in U.S.,

languages spoken at home



1-18

1.5 Response Rates The overall response rates for CHIS 2017-2018 are composites of the screener completion

rate (i.e., success in introducing the survey to a household and randomly selecting an adult to be

interviewed) and the extended interview completion rate (i.e., success in getting one or more

selected persons to complete the extended interview). For CHIS 2017-2018, the landline/list sample

household response rate was 5.6 percent (the product of the screener response rate of 10.8 percent

and the extended interview response rate at the household level of 52.0 percent). The cell sample

household response rate was 3.5 percent, incorporating a screener response rate of 7.1 percent and

household-level extended interview response rate of 49.0 percent. CHIS uses AAPOR response rate

RR4 (see more detailed in CHIS 2017-2018 Methodology Series: Report 4 – Response Rates).

Within the landline and cell phone sampling frames for 2017-2018, the extended interview

response rate for the landline/list sample varied across the adult (43.8 percent), child (60.0 percent)

and adolescent (25.6 percent) interviews. The adolescent rate includes the process of obtaining

permission from a parent or guardian.

The adult interview response rate for the cell sample was 40.9 percent, the child rate was

57.5 percent, and the adolescent rate was 18.0 percent in 2017-2018 (see Table 1-4a). Multiplying

these rates by the screener response rates used in the household rates above gives an overall

response rate for each type of interview for each survey year (see Table 1-4b). As in previous years,

household and person level response rates vary by sampling stratum. CHIS response rates are

similar to, and sometimes higher than, other comparable surveys that interview by telephone.

Table 1-4a. CHIS 2017-2018 response rates – Conditional

Type of Sample Screener Household

Adult

(given

screened)

Child

(given screened

& eligibility)

Adolescent

(given

screened &

permission)

Overall 8.0% 49.9% 42.3% 58.3% 21.3%

Landline RDD/List 10.8% 52.0% 43.8% 60.0% 25.6%

Cell RDD/List 7.1% 49.0% 40.9% 57.5% 18.0%


Note. This table does not include the Imperial County, AIAN, and San Francisco oversamples.


1-19

To maximize the response rate, especially at the screener stage, an advance letter in six

languages was mailed to all landline sampled telephone numbers for which an address could be

obtained from reverse directory services. An advance letter was mailed for 39.1 percent of the

landline RDD sample telephone numbers not identified by the sample vendor as business numbers

or not identified by SSRS’s dialer software as nonworking numbers, and for 100 percent of

surname list sample numbers. Combining these two frames, advance letters were sent to 41.0

percent of all fielded landline telephone numbers. From the onset of 2017 fielding until April of

2018, cell phone sample with matched telephone numbers also received an advance letter.

However, after a randomized experiment confirmed that the accuracy of the matching for cell

phone sample did not warrant continuing these mailings, they were discontinued (for full

experiment details, see Section 7.1 in CHIS 2017-2018 Methodology Series: Report 4 – Response

Rates). Overall, across the two years, for cell sample, an advance letter was mailed for 27.2 percent

of the RDD sample telephone numbers not identified by the sample vendor as business numbers or

not identified by SSRS’s dialer software as nonworking numbers, and for 100 percent of surname

list sample numbers. Combining these two frames, advance letters were sent to 30.4 percent of all

fielded cell telephone numbers. As in all CHIS cycles since CHIS 2005, a $2 bill was included

with the CHIS 2017-2018 advance letter to encourage cooperation. Unlike previous cycles,

additional incentives were not offered to cell phone and nonresponse follow up (NRFU)

respondents.

After all follow-up attempts to complete the full questionnaire were exhausted, adults who

completed at least approximately 80 percent of the questionnaire (i.e., through Section K which

covers employment, income, poverty status, and food security), were counted as “complete.” At

least some responses in the employment and income series, or public program eligibility and food

Table 1-4b. CHIS 2017-2018 response rates – Unconditional

Type of Sample Screener Household

Adult

(given

screened)

Child (given

screened &

eligibility

Adolescent

(given

screened &

permission)

Overall 8.0% 4.0% 3.4% 4.6% 1.7%

Landline RDD/List 10.8% 5.6% 4.7% 6.4% 2.8%

Cell RDD/List 7.1% 3.5% 2.9% 4.1% 1.3%


Note. This table does not include the Imperial County, AIAN, and San Francisco oversamples


1-20

insecurity series were missing from those cases that did not complete the entire interview. They

were imputed to enhance the analytic utility of the data.

Proxy interviews were conducted for any adult who was unable to complete the extended

adult interview for themselves, in order to avoid biases for health estimates of chronically ill or

handicapped people. Eligible selected persons were re-contacted and offered a proxy option. In

CHIS 2017-2018, either a spouse/partner or adult child completed a proxy interview for 20 adults.

A reduced questionnaire, with questions identified as appropriate for a proxy respondent, was

administered.

Further information about CHIS data quality and nonresponse bias is available at

http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/data-quality.aspx.

1.6 Weighting the Sample

To produce population estimates from CHIS data, weights were applied to the sample data

to compensate for the probability of selection and a variety of other factors, some directly resulting

from the design and administration of the survey. The sample was weighted to represent the

noninstitutionalized population for each sampling stratum and statewide. The weighting procedures

used for CHIS 2017-2018 accomplish the following objectives:

Compensate for differential probabilities of selection for phone numbers (households)

and persons within household;

Reduce biases occurring because non respondents may have different characteristics

than respondents;

Adjust, to the extent possible, for undercoverage in the sampling frames and in the

conduct of the survey; and

Reduce the variance of the estimates by using auxiliary information

As part of the weighting process, a household weight was created for all households that

completed the screener interview. This household weight is the product of the “base weight” (the

inverse of the probability of selection of the telephone number) and a variety of adjustment factors.

The household weight was used to compute a person-level weight, which includes adjustments for


http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/data-quality.aspx

http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/data-quality.aspx

1-21

the within-household sampling of persons and for nonresponse. The final step was to adjust the

person-level weight using weight calibration, a procedure that forced the CHIS weights to sum to

estimated population control totals simultaneously from an independent data source (see below).

Population control totals of the number of persons by age, race, and sex at the stratum level

for

CHIS 2017-2018 were created primarily from the California Department of Finance’s (DOF) 2017

and 2018 Population Estimates, and associated population projections. The procedure used several

dimensions, which are combinations of demographic variables (age, sex, race, and ethnicity),

geographic variables (county, Service Planning Area in Los Angeles County, and Health Region in

San Diego County), and education. One limitation of using Department of Finance (DOF) data is

that it includes about 2.4 percent of the population of California who live in “group quarters” (i.e.,

persons living with nine or more unrelated persons and includes, for example nursing homes,

prisons, dormitories, etc.). These persons were excluded from the CHIS target population and, as a

result, the number of persons living in group quarters was estimated and removed from the

Department of Finance control totals prior to calibration.

The DOF control totals used to create the CHIS 2017-2018 weights are based on 2010

Census counts, as were those used for the 2015-2016 cycle. Please pay close attention when

comparing estimates using CHIS 2017-2018 data with estimates using data from CHIS cycles

before 2010. The most accurate California population figures are available when the U.S. Census

Bureau conducts the decennial census. For periods between each census, population-based surveys

like CHIS must use population projections based on the decennial count. For example, population

control totals for CHIS 2009 were based on 2009 DOF estimates and projections, which were based

on Census 2000 counts with adjustments for demographic changes within the state between 2000

and 2009. These estimates become less accurate and more dependent on the models underlying the

adjustments over time. Using the most recent Census population count information to create control

totals for weighting produces the most statistically accurate population estimates for the current

cycle, but it may produce unexpected increases or decreases in some survey estimates when

comparing survey cycles that use 2000 Census-based information and 2010 Census-based

information.


1-22

1.7 Imputation Methods Missing values in the CHIS data files were replaced through imputation for nearly every

variable. This was a substantial task designed to enhance the analytic utility of the files. SSRS

imputed missing values for those variables used in the weighting process and UCLA-CHPR staff

imputed values for nearly every other variable.

Three different imputation procedures were used by SSRS to fill in missing responses for

items essential for weighting the data. The first imputation technique was a completely random

selection from the observed distribution of respondents. This method was used only for a few

variables when the percentage of the items missing was very small. The second technique was hot

deck imputation. The hot deck approach is one of the most commonly used methods for assigning

values for missing responses. Using a hot deck, a value reported by a respondent for a specific item

was assigned or donated to a “similar” person who did not respond to that item. The characteristics

defining “similar” vary for different variables. To carry out hot-deck imputation, the respondents

who answered a survey item formed a pool of donors, while the item non respondents formed a

group of recipients. A recipient was matched to the subset pool of donors based on household and

individual characteristics. A value for the recipient was then randomly imputed from one of the

donors in the pool. SSRS used hot deck imputation to impute the same items that have been

imputed in all CHIS cycles since 2003 (i.e., race, ethnicity, home ownership, and education). The

last technique was external data assignment. This method was used for geocoding variables such as

strata, Los Angeles SPA, San Diego HSR, and zip where the respondent provided inconsistent

information. For such cases geocoding information was used for imputation.

UCLA-CHPR imputed missing values for nearly every variable in the data files other than

those imputed by SSRS and some sensitive variables for which nonresponse had its own meaning.

Overall, item nonresponse rates in CHIS 2017-2018 were low, with most variables missing valid

responses for less than 1% of the sample. Questions that go to fewer overall respondents or that ask

about more sensitive topics can have higher nonresponse.

The imputation process conducted by UCLA-CHPR started with data editing, sometimes

referred to as logical or relational imputation: for any missing value, a valid replacement value was


1-23

sought based on known values of other variables of the same respondent or other sample(s) from

the same household. For the remaining missing values, model-based hot-deck imputation without

donor replacement was used. This method replaced a missing value for one respondent using a

valid response from another respondent with similar characteristics as defined by a generalized

linear model with a set of control variables (predictors). The link function of the model

corresponded to the nature of the variable being imputed (e.g. linear regression for continues

variables, logistic regression for binary variables, etc.). Donors and recipients were grouped based

on their predicted values from the model.

Control variables (predictors) used in the model to form donor pools for hot-decking

always included standard measures of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, as well as

geographic region; however, the full set of control variables varies depending on which variable is

being imputed. Most imputation models included additional characteristics, such as health status or

access to care, which are used to improve the quality of the donor-recipient match.

Among the standard list of control variables, gender, age, race/ethnicity, educational

attainment and region of California were imputed by SSRS. UCLA-CHPR began their imputation

process by imputing household income so that this characteristic was available for the imputation

of other variables. Sometimes CHIS collects bracketed information about the range in which the

respondent’s value falls when the respondent will not or cannot report an exact amount. Household

income, for example, was imputed using the hot-deck method within ranges defined by a set of

auxiliary variables such as bracketed income range and/or poverty level.

The imputation order of the other variables generally followed the questionnaire. After all

imputation procedures were complete, every step in the data quality control process was performed

once again to ensure consistency between the imputed and non-imputed values on a case-by-case

basis.


1-24

4. Sample Code for Analysis and Pooling of CHIS Data As previously noted, sample code to assist with analyses and pooling of CHIS data is available on

the CHIS website at http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/analyze/Pages/default.aspx


http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/analyze/Pages/default.aspx

1-25

5. Restricted Variables

The following geographic variables are not located in the funder files, but may be accessible upon

request and IRB approval (UCLA & CPHS). These variables are restricted due to their identifiable

nature.

VARIABLE LABEL NOTE

LATITUDE LATITUDE GEOGRAPHIC LONGITUDE OF RESIDENCE. USED FOR MAPPING.

LONGIT LONGITUDE GEOGRAPHIC LONGITUDE OF RESIDENCE. USED FOR MAPPING.

CBLK

CENSUS BLOCK

INCLUDING

CENSUS TRACT

SMALLEST CENSUS DELINEATION AVAILABLE TO MERGE WITH

CENSUS DATA; USED FOR MULTILEVEL MODELING,

NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS.

Teen and child restricted variables

VARIABLE LABEL NOTE

SCH_BLK

SCHOOL CENSUS

TRACT

INCLUDING

BLOCK

SMALLEST CENSUS DELINEATION AVAILABLE TO MERGE WITH

CENSUS DATA; USED FOR MULTILEVEL MODELING, SCHOOL

NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS.

SCH_CDS

STATE SCHOOL

ID NUMBER

SCH_LAT

SCHOOL

LATITUDE GEOGRAPHIC LONGITUDE OF SCHOOL. USED FOR MAPPING.

SCH_LON

SCHOOL

LONGITUDE GEOGRAPHIC LONGITUDE OF SCHOOL. USED FOR MAPPING.


1-26

6. CHIS Data Dictionary How to Use the Data Dictionary

This Data Dictionary describes the variables in the CHIS 2018 data file. The index of the data

dictionary lists variables first in alphabetical order and then in the order they were administered in

the survey questionnaire. Please note that identical variable names appearing in the CHIS 2001,

CHIS 2003, CHIS 2005, CHIS 2007, CHIS 2009, CHIS 2011-12, CHIS 2013-2014, CHIS 2015-16,

and CHIS 2017-18 data files does not guarantee identical question wording, response categories or

universe; please consult the questionnaires and data dictionaries to assess comparability across

cycles. A printable version of the questionnaire can be found on the California Health Interview

Survey web site at http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/questionnairesEnglish.aspx.

The data dictionary contains the following fields:

VARNAME: The names of the variables.

LABEL: A description (or label) of the variable which is the same as what is included in the

label file described in Section 1.2.

VALUE: Response categories and their sample distributions of categorical variables. The

following negative values are used for all variables:

-1: INAPPLICABLE.

-2: PROXY SKIPPED.

-5: CHILD/HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION NOT COLLECTED FOR TEEN AND CHILD

INTERVIEWS.

-7: REFUSED.

-8: DON’T KNOW.

-9: NOT ASCERTAINED.

MEAN STATISTICS: Sample distributions of continuous variables.

UNIVERSE: The scope of eligible respondents for the corresponding item. For some

questions and variables, certain respondents become ineligible due to skip patterns or other

restrictions (e.g., age and sex).

INPUT VAR: Source variables used to construct the one in the VARNAME field.

NOTES: Additional information about the variable.

Navigation

Users can also navigate between data dictionary sections by clicking on the section listings on the

next page.


http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Pages/questionnairesEnglish.aspx

TABLE OF CONTENTS

VARIABLE NAME (alphabetical)

VARIABLE NAME (location)

SECTION Q: SCREENING INFORMATION

SECTION A: DEMOGRAPHICS, PART I, HEALTHCONDITIONS

SECTION B: DENTAL HEALTH

SECTION C: DIET, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, PARK USE

SECTION D: HEALTH CARE ACCESS & UTILIZATION

SECTION E: PUBLIC PROGRAMS

SECTION F: PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT, CONCERNS,MENTAL HEALTH

SECTION G: CHILD CARE & NEIGHBORHOOD COHESION

SECTION H: DEMOGRAPHICS, PART II

SECTION I: HEALTH INSURANCE

SECTION O: DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PART III,GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

SECTION P: FULL DESIGN & REPLICATE WEIGHTSERIES 0-80


Variable Name (alphabetical)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Variable Label Page-------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------AC42 HOW OFTEN FIND FRESH FRUIT/VEG IN NEIGHB C-8

AC44 NEIGHBORHOOD FRUIT/VEG AFFORDABLE C-9

ACMDM_P1 # OF DOCTOR VISITS PAST YEAR (PUF 1 YR RECODE) D-4

AGEGRP_A AGE GROUP OF ADULT Q-1

AHEDTC_P1 ADULT EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (PUF 1 YR RECODE) Q-2

AM36 DID VOLUNTEER WORK OR COMMUNITY SERVICES PAST YR G-11

ASTCUR CURRENT ASTHMA A-10

CA12 DOCTOR EVER TOLD YOU CHILD HAS ASTHMA A-9

CA14 EVER BREASTFED OR FED BREAST MILK A-7

CA16 AGE WHEN STARTED SOLID FOODS A-8

CA17 CURRENTLY NEEDS OR USES PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE A-2

CA18 NEEDS PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE FOR HEALTH CONDITION A-2

CA19 HEALTH CONDITION REQUIRING PRESCRIPTION LASTED 12 MOS OR A-2MORE

CA23 NEEDS OR GETS SPECIAL THERAPY A-3

CA24 NEEDS THERAPY FOR HEALTH CONDITION A-3

CA31 STILL HAS ASTHMA A-9

CA34_P1 MISSED SCHOOL DUE TO ASTHMA IN PAST 12 MOS (PUF 1-YR A-10RECODE)

CA35 DOCTOR EVER GIVEN ASTHMA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CHILD A-10

CA42_P1 CHILD ATTEND SCHOOL LAST WEEK (PUF 1-YR RECODE) A-4

CA43_P CHILD ATTEND SCHOOL LAST SCHOOL YEAR (PUF RECODE) A-4

CA50 HAVE WRITTEN COPY OF PLAN A-11

CA6 GENERAL HEALTH CONDITION A-8

CA6_P1 GENERAL HEALTH CONDITION (PUF 1 YR RECODE) A-9

CA7 CURRENT CONDITION LIMITING ABILITY TO DO AGE-APPROPRIATE A-11THINGS


CB23_P1 MAIN REASON DID NOT VISIT DENTIST PAST YEAR (PUF 1 YR B-4RECODE)

CB27 CHILD COULDN'T GET NEEDED DENTAL CARE IN PAST 12 MOS B-4

CB34B WHO PAYS FOR DENTAL INSURANCE B-5

CC13 # OF SERVINGS OF FRUIT HAD YESTERDAY C-2

CC16B CHILD HAS USUAL DENTIST C-1

CC17 COULDN T AFFORD NEEDED DENTAL CARE IN PAST 12 MOS C-1

CC18B MISSED SCHOOL FOR DENTAL PROBLEM IN PAST 12 MOS C-2

CC1B CHILD HAS ANY TEETH B-2

CC31 # SERVINGS OF VEGETABLES HAD YESTERDAY C-3

CC35 # DAYS PHYS ACTIVE AT LEAST 60 MIN IN PAST WEEK C-4

CC36 PARK/PLAYGROUND WITHIN 30 MINS WALKING DISTANCE OF HOME C-4

CC37 BEEN TO PARK LAST 30 DAYS C-4

CC39 CLOSEST PARK SAFE DURING DAY C-5

CC40_P1 # DAYS PAST WEEK WALKED HOME FROM SCHOOL (PUF 1 YR C-5RECODE)

CC43_P1 # DAYS PAST WEEK BIKED HOME FROM SCHOOL (PUF 1 YR C-6RECODE)

CC50 # GLASSES OF SWEETENED FRUIT DRINKS DRANK YESTERDAY C-6

CC51 # DAYS PHYSICALLY ACTIVE 60+MINS IN TYPICAL WEEK C-7

CC52 TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVITIES (TV, COMP GAMES, C-7TALK.W/FRIENDS) AF

CC53 TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVITIES (TV, COMP GAMES, C-8TALK.W/FRIENDS) WK

CC5B_P1V2 HOW LONG SINCE CHILD LAST VISITED DENTIST (PUF RECODE B-2v2)

CC7A INS PAYS FOR CHILD'S DENTAL CARE B-3

CC7BNEW USE FREE COMMUNITY OR PUBLIC DENTAL PROGRAMS B-5

CD1 HAS USUAL PLACE FOR CHILD'S HEALTH CARE D-1

CD12 CHILD VISITED HOSPITAL ER IN PAST 12 MOS D-5

CD3 KIND OF PLACE MOST OFTEN TAKE CHILD FOR HEALTH CARE D-2

CD31_P1 LANGUAGE DOCTOR SPEAKS TO R (PUF 1 YR RECODE) D-6


CD33 CHILD HAS PERSONAL DR AS MAIN PROVIDER D-7

CD36 DR COORDINATES CARE WITH OTHER DRS D-10

CD57 RECEIVED PARENT KIT THIS YEAR F-7

CD69 HAD TROUBLE FINDING GENERAL DOC PAST 12 MOS D-9

CD7 HOW LONG SINCE LAST SAW MEDICAL DOCTOR D-5

CD70 NOT ACCEPTED AS NEW PATIENT BY DOC PAST YR D-9

CD71 HEALTH CARE COVERAGE NOT ACCEPTED BY DOC PAST YR D-9

CE1 DELAY/NOT GET PRES MEDICINE FOR CHILD IN PAST 12 MOS D-7

CE11A CHILD RECEIVING FOOD STAMP BENEFITS E-2

CE11C CHILD CURRENTLY ON WIC E-1

CE12 COST OR LACK OF INS REASON PRESCRIPTION DELAYED/NOT D-8RECVD

CE13 COST OR LACK OF INS REASON MEDICAL CARE DELAYED/NOT D-8RECVD

CE7 DELAY/NOT GET MEDICAL CARE CHILD NEEDED PAST 12 MOS D-7

CF10A CHILD HAS SAME INS AS ADULT RESPONDENT I-1

CF14 CHILD COVERED FOR PRESCRIPTIONS I-2

CF21 HOW LONG SINCE CHILD LAST HAD HEALTH INS I-2

CF30 CHILD HAS DIFFICULTIES WITH EMOT/ CONCENT/ BEHAV IN PAST F-86 MOS

CF31_P1 CHILD S EMOTIONAL DIFFICULTIES MINOR, DEFINITE OR SEVERE F-8(PUF 1 Y

CF32 CHILD RECEIVED PSYCH/EMOTIONAL COUNSELING IN PAST 12 MOS F-9

CF35 KNOWS STATE PROVIDES FREE PARENT KIT F-6

CF36 EVER RECEIVED PARENT KIT F-6

CF39 USED MATERIALS FROM PARENT KIT F-7

CF40 CHILD EVER RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT TEST F-1

CF41 TEST INCLUDED ROLLING, PICKING UP OBJECTS, RECOGNIZING F-2COLORS

CF42 FILLED OUT CHECKLIST ABOUT CHILD LEARNING/BEHAVIOR F-2CONCERNS


CF43 FILLED OUT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL TASKS CHILD CAN DO F-2

CF44 ASKED ABOUT CONCERNS WITH LEARNING, DEVELOPMENT, F-3BEHAVIOR OF CHIL

CF45 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL CONCERNED THAT CHILD SHOULD BE F-3MONITORED

CF46 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REFERRED CHILD TO SPECIALIST F-4

CF47 PROF REFER FOR SPEECH, LANGUAGE, HEARING F-4

CF64 HEARD MESSAGES ENCOURAGING TALKING, READING, SINGING F-4WITH CHILD

CF65 TALK WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER F-5MESSAGE

CF66 SING WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER F-5MESSAGE

CF67 READ WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER F-6MESSAGE

CG1 HAVE REGULAR CHILDCARE 10 OR MORE HRS PER WEEK G-1

CG14 # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER READS TO CHILD USUAL WEEK G-7

CG15 # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER PLAYS MUSIC/SINGS W/ CHILD USUAL G-8WEEK

CG16 # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER TAKES CHILD OUT SOMEWHERE G-8

CG2_P1 # OF HRS CHILD IN CHILDCARE DURING TYPICAL WEEK (PUF 1 G-2YR RECODE)

CG34 ADULTS IN NEIGHBORHOOD LOOK OUT FOR CHILDREN G-10

CG39 PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD WILLING TO HELP G-9

CG3A RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM GRANDPARENT OR OTHER FAMILY G-2MEMBER

CG3B RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM HEAD START OR STATE PRESCHOOL G-3PROGRAM

CG3C RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM PRESCHOOL OR NURSERY SCHOOL G-3

CG3D RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM CHILDCARE CENTER NOT IN SOMEONE'S G-4HOME

CG3E RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM NON-FAMILY IN YOUR HOME G-4

CG3F RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM NON-FAMILY MEMBER IN HIS/HER HOME G-5

CG3G CHILDCARE PROVIDER LICENSED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA G-5


CG3RC TYPE OF CHILDCARE G-6

CG40 PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD DON'T GET ALONG G-9

CG41 PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD CAN BE TRUSTED G-10

CG42 FEEL SAFE IN NEIGHBORHOOD G-11

CG5 COULDN'T FIND CHILDCARE FOR A WEEK OR LONGER IN PAST 12 G-6MOS

CG6 MAIN REASON UNABLE TO FIND CHILDCARE G-7

CH18 SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ADULT LEVEL OF ENGLISH H-4PROFICIENCY: GE

CHEDU_P1 EDUCATION LEVEL OF SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ADULT (PUF Q-21 YR REC

DNVST CHILD DENTAL VISIT PAST YEAR B-3

DOCT_YR VISITED A DOCTOR DURING PAST 12 MOS D-4

ER ER VISIT WITHIN THE PAST YEAR D-6

FAMSZ2_P1 FAMILY SIZE: INCLUDES ALL PEOPLE SUPPORTED BY HH INCOME Q-3(PUF 1 YR

FAMT4 FAMILY TYPE (4 LVLS) Q-3

FSLEV FOOD SECURITY STATUS LEVEL C-9

FSLEVCB FOOD SECURITY STATUS (2 LVLS) C-10

FV5DAY2 EAT FIVE OR MORE SERVING OF FRUITS & VEGETABLES C-3

HGHTI_P HEIGHT - INCHES (PUF RECODE) A-5

HGHTM_P HEIGHT - METERS (PUF RECODE) A-6

HHSIZE_P1V2 HOUSEHOLD SIZE (PUF 1 YR RECODE v2) Q-3

HMO HMO STATUS I-8

INS CURRENTLY INSURED I-3

INS12M MOS COVERED BY HEALTH PLANS LAST 12 MOS I-3

INS64 TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE - UNDER 65 I-4

INS9TP TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE FOR ALL AGES (9 I-7LVLS)

INSANY ANY INS IN LAST 12 MOS I-4

INSEM COVERED BY EMPLOYER-BASED PLANS I-5


INSMD COVERED BY MEDI-CAL I-5

INSOG COVERED BY OTHER GOVT PLANS I-5

INSPR COVERED BY PLANS PURCHASED ON OWN I-6

INSTYPE TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE FOR ALL AGES I-6

INTVLNGC2_P1 LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW (PUF 1 YR RECODE v2) H-5

LNGHMC_P1 LANGUAGES SPOKEN AT HOME (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-2

MA2_P NAME OF HEALTH PLAN (PUF RECODE) I-8

MA3 MAIN HEALTH PLAN IS HMO I-7

OMBSRCN_P1 OMB/CURRENT DOF RACE - ETHNICITY (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-2

POVGWD_P1 FAMILY POVERTY THRESHOLD LEVEL (PUF 1 YR RECODE) Q-4

POVLL POVERTY LEVEL Q-4

POVLL2_P1V2 POVERTY LEVEL AS TIMES OF 100% FPL (PUF 17 RECODE v2) Q-5

POVLL_ACA FAMILY POVERTY THRESHOLD LEVEL: ACA MAGI ELIGIBILITY (4 Q-5LVLS)

PUF1Y_ID PUBLIC USE FILE ID - CHIS 1 YEAR DATAFILES Q-1

RACECNC_P1 RACE - CENSUS 2000 DEFINITION (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-3

RACEDFC_P1 RACE - FORMER DOF RACE-ETHNICITY (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-3

RACEH2C_P1 RACE - UCLA CHPR DEFINITION, UNABRIDGED (PUF 1 YR H-4RECODE)

RAKEDW0 CHIS2017 RAKED WEIGHT - FULL SAMPLE P-1

RAKEDW1 CHIS2017 RAKED WEIGHT - REPLICATE 1 P-2
























SECTION A DEMOGRAPHICS, PART I, HEALTH CONDITIONS A-1

SECTION B DENTAL HEALTH B-1

SECTION C DIET, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, PARK USE C-1

SECTION D HEALTH CARE ACCESS & UTILIZATION D-1

SECTION E PUBLIC PROGRAMS E-1

SECTION F PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT, CONCERNS, MENTAL HEALTH F-1

SECTION G CHILD CARE & NEIGHBORHOOD COHESION G-1

SECTION H DEMOGRAPHICS, PART II H-1

SECTION I HEALTH INSURANCE I-1

SECTION O DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PART III, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION O-1

SECTION P FULL DESIGN & REPLICATE WEIGHT SERIES 0-80 P-1

SECTION Q SCREENING INFORMATION Q-1

SRAGE_P AGE (PUF RECODE) A-5

SRSEX GENDER A-3

SRSEX_A GENDER (ADULT) Q-6


SRTENR SELF-REPORTED HOUSEHOLD TENURE (HH) Q-6

UNINSANY UNINSURED IN PAST 12 MOS I-9

UR_BG6 RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY BLOCK GROUP)(6 LVLS) O-3

UR_CLRT2 RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY ZIPCODE) (2 LVLS) O-1


UR_IHS RURAL AND URBAN - IHS O-2

UR_OMB RURAL AND URBAN - OMB O-2

UR_RHP RURAL AND URBAN - RHP O-2

UR_TRACT6 RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY CENSUS TRACT) (6 LVLS) O-4

USOC USUAL SOURCE OF CARE OTHER THAN ER D-3

USUAL HAVE USUAL PLACE TO GO TO WHEN SICK OR NEED HEALTH D-3ADVICE

USUAL5TP USUAL SOURCE OF CARE (5 LVLS) D-2

WGHTK_P WEIGHT - KILOGRAMS (PUF RECODE) A-6

WGHTP_P WEIGHT - POUNDS (PUF RECODE) A-7--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Variable Name (by location)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Variable Label Page-------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------SECTION Q SCREENING INFORMATION Q-1

PUF1Y_ID PUBLIC USE FILE ID - CHIS 1 YEAR DATAFILES Q-1

AGEGRP_A AGE GROUP OF ADULT Q-1

AHEDTC_P1 ADULT EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (PUF 1 YR RECODE) Q-2

CHEDU_P1 EDUCATION LEVEL OF SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ADULT (PUF Q-21 YR REC

FAMSZ2_P1 FAMILY SIZE: INCLUDES ALL PEOPLE SUPPORTED BY HH INCOME Q-3(PUF 1 YR

FAMT4 FAMILY TYPE (4 LVLS) Q-3

HHSIZE_P1V2 HOUSEHOLD SIZE (PUF 1 YR RECODE v2) Q-3

POVGWD_P1 FAMILY POVERTY THRESHOLD LEVEL (PUF 1 YR RECODE) Q-4

POVLL POVERTY LEVEL Q-4

POVLL2_P1V2 POVERTY LEVEL AS TIMES OF 100% FPL (PUF 17 RECODE v2) Q-5

POVLL_ACA FAMILY POVERTY THRESHOLD LEVEL: ACA MAGI ELIGIBILITY (4 Q-5LVLS)

SRSEX_A GENDER (ADULT) Q-6

SRTENR SELF-REPORTED HOUSEHOLD TENURE (HH) Q-6

SECTION A DEMOGRAPHICS, PART I, HEALTH CONDITIONS A-1

CA17 CURRENTLY NEEDS OR USES PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE A-2

CA18 NEEDS PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE FOR HEALTH CONDITION A-2

CA19 HEALTH CONDITION REQUIRING PRESCRIPTION LASTED 12 MOS OR A-2MORE

CA23 NEEDS OR GETS SPECIAL THERAPY A-3

CA24 NEEDS THERAPY FOR HEALTH CONDITION A-3

SRSEX GENDER A-3

CA42_P1 CHILD ATTEND SCHOOL LAST WEEK (PUF 1-YR RECODE) A-4

CA43_P CHILD ATTEND SCHOOL LAST SCHOOL YEAR (PUF RECODE) A-4

SRAGE_P AGE (PUF RECODE) A-5


HGHTI_P HEIGHT - INCHES (PUF RECODE) A-5

HGHTM_P HEIGHT - METERS (PUF RECODE) A-6

WGHTK_P WEIGHT - KILOGRAMS (PUF RECODE) A-6

WGHTP_P WEIGHT - POUNDS (PUF RECODE) A-7

CA14 EVER BREASTFED OR FED BREAST MILK A-7

CA16 AGE WHEN STARTED SOLID FOODS A-8

CA6 GENERAL HEALTH CONDITION A-8

CA6_P1 GENERAL HEALTH CONDITION (PUF 1 YR RECODE) A-9

CA12 DOCTOR EVER TOLD YOU CHILD HAS ASTHMA A-9

CA31 STILL HAS ASTHMA A-9

ASTCUR CURRENT ASTHMA A-10

CA34_P1 MISSED SCHOOL DUE TO ASTHMA IN PAST 12 MOS (PUF 1-YR A-10RECODE)

CA35 DOCTOR EVER GIVEN ASTHMA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CHILD A-10

CA50 HAVE WRITTEN COPY OF PLAN A-11

CA7 CURRENT CONDITION LIMITING ABILITY TO DO AGE-APPROPRIATE A-11THINGS

SECTION B DENTAL HEALTH B-1

CC1B CHILD HAS ANY TEETH B-2

CC5B_P1V2 HOW LONG SINCE CHILD LAST VISITED DENTIST (PUF RECODE B-2v2)

CC7A INS PAYS FOR CHILD'S DENTAL CARE B-3

DNVST CHILD DENTAL VISIT PAST YEAR B-3

CB23_P1 MAIN REASON DID NOT VISIT DENTIST PAST YEAR (PUF 1 YR B-4RECODE)

CB27 CHILD COULDN'T GET NEEDED DENTAL CARE IN PAST 12 MOS B-4

CB34B WHO PAYS FOR DENTAL INSURANCE B-5

CC7BNEW USE FREE COMMUNITY OR PUBLIC DENTAL PROGRAMS B-5

SECTION C DIET, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, PARK USE C-1

CC16B CHILD HAS USUAL DENTIST C-1


CC17 COULDN T AFFORD NEEDED DENTAL CARE IN PAST 12 MOS C-1

CC18B MISSED SCHOOL FOR DENTAL PROBLEM IN PAST 12 MOS C-2

CC13 # OF SERVINGS OF FRUIT HAD YESTERDAY C-2

CC31 # SERVINGS OF VEGETABLES HAD YESTERDAY C-3

FV5DAY2 EAT FIVE OR MORE SERVING OF FRUITS & VEGETABLES C-3

CC35 # DAYS PHYS ACTIVE AT LEAST 60 MIN IN PAST WEEK C-4

CC36 PARK/PLAYGROUND WITHIN 30 MINS WALKING DISTANCE OF HOME C-4

CC37 BEEN TO PARK LAST 30 DAYS C-4

CC39 CLOSEST PARK SAFE DURING DAY C-5

CC40_P1 # DAYS PAST WEEK WALKED HOME FROM SCHOOL (PUF 1 YR C-5RECODE)

CC43_P1 # DAYS PAST WEEK BIKED HOME FROM SCHOOL (PUF 1 YR C-6RECODE)

CC50 # GLASSES OF SWEETENED FRUIT DRINKS DRANK YESTERDAY C-6

CC51 # DAYS PHYSICALLY ACTIVE 60+MINS IN TYPICAL WEEK C-7

CC52 TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVITIES (TV, COMP GAMES, C-7TALK.W/FRIENDS) AF

CC53 TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVITIES (TV, COMP GAMES, C-8TALK.W/FRIENDS) WK

AC42 HOW OFTEN FIND FRESH FRUIT/VEG IN NEIGHB C-8

AC44 NEIGHBORHOOD FRUIT/VEG AFFORDABLE C-9

FSLEV FOOD SECURITY STATUS LEVEL C-9

FSLEVCB FOOD SECURITY STATUS (2 LVLS) C-10

SECTION D HEALTH CARE ACCESS & UTILIZATION D-1

CD1 HAS USUAL PLACE FOR CHILD'S HEALTH CARE D-1

CD3 KIND OF PLACE MOST OFTEN TAKE CHILD FOR HEALTH CARE D-2

USUAL5TP USUAL SOURCE OF CARE (5 LVLS) D-2

USUAL HAVE USUAL PLACE TO GO TO WHEN SICK OR NEED HEALTH D-3ADVICE

USOC USUAL SOURCE OF CARE OTHER THAN ER D-3

ACMDM_P1 # OF DOCTOR VISITS PAST YEAR (PUF 1 YR RECODE) D-4


DOCT_YR VISITED A DOCTOR DURING PAST 12 MOS D-4

CD7 HOW LONG SINCE LAST SAW MEDICAL DOCTOR D-5

CD12 CHILD VISITED HOSPITAL ER IN PAST 12 MOS D-5

ER ER VISIT WITHIN THE PAST YEAR D-6

CD31_P1 LANGUAGE DOCTOR SPEAKS TO R (PUF 1 YR RECODE) D-6

CD33 CHILD HAS PERSONAL DR AS MAIN PROVIDER D-7

CE1 DELAY/NOT GET PRES MEDICINE FOR CHILD IN PAST 12 MOS D-7

CE7 DELAY/NOT GET MEDICAL CARE CHILD NEEDED PAST 12 MOS D-7

CE12 COST OR LACK OF INS REASON PRESCRIPTION DELAYED/NOT D-8RECVD

CE13 COST OR LACK OF INS REASON MEDICAL CARE DELAYED/NOT D-8RECVD

CD69 HAD TROUBLE FINDING GENERAL DOC PAST 12 MOS D-9

CD70 NOT ACCEPTED AS NEW PATIENT BY DOC PAST YR D-9

CD71 HEALTH CARE COVERAGE NOT ACCEPTED BY DOC PAST YR D-9

CD36 DR COORDINATES CARE WITH OTHER DRS D-10

SECTION E PUBLIC PROGRAMS E-1

CE11C CHILD CURRENTLY ON WIC E-1

CE11A CHILD RECEIVING FOOD STAMP BENEFITS E-2

SECTION F PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT, CONCERNS, MENTAL HEALTH F-1

CF40 CHILD EVER RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT TEST F-1

CF41 TEST INCLUDED ROLLING, PICKING UP OBJECTS, RECOGNIZING F-2COLORS

CF42 FILLED OUT CHECKLIST ABOUT CHILD LEARNING/BEHAVIOR F-2CONCERNS

CF43 FILLED OUT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL TASKS CHILD CAN DO F-2

CF44 ASKED ABOUT CONCERNS WITH LEARNING, DEVELOPMENT, F-3BEHAVIOR OF CHIL

CF45 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL CONCERNED THAT CHILD SHOULD BE F-3MONITORED

CF46 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REFERRED CHILD TO SPECIALIST F-4

CF47 PROF REFER FOR SPEECH, LANGUAGE, HEARING F-4


CF64 HEARD MESSAGES ENCOURAGING TALKING, READING, SINGING F-4WITH CHILD

CF65 TALK WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER F-5MESSAGE

CF66 SING WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER F-5MESSAGE

CF67 READ WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER F-6MESSAGE

CF35 KNOWS STATE PROVIDES FREE PARENT KIT F-6

CF36 EVER RECEIVED PARENT KIT F-6

CD57 RECEIVED PARENT KIT THIS YEAR F-7

CF39 USED MATERIALS FROM PARENT KIT F-7

CF30 CHILD HAS DIFFICULTIES WITH EMOT/ CONCENT/ BEHAV IN PAST F-86 MOS

CF31_P1 CHILD S EMOTIONAL DIFFICULTIES MINOR, DEFINITE OR SEVERE F-8(PUF 1 Y

CF32 CHILD RECEIVED PSYCH/EMOTIONAL COUNSELING IN PAST 12 MOS F-9

SECTION G CHILD CARE & NEIGHBORHOOD COHESION G-1

CG1 HAVE REGULAR CHILDCARE 10 OR MORE HRS PER WEEK G-1

CG2_P1 # OF HRS CHILD IN CHILDCARE DURING TYPICAL WEEK (PUF 1 G-2YR RECODE)

CG3A RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM GRANDPARENT OR OTHER FAMILY G-2MEMBER

CG3B RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM HEAD START OR STATE PRESCHOOL G-3PROGRAM

CG3C RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM PRESCHOOL OR NURSERY SCHOOL G-3

CG3D RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM CHILDCARE CENTER NOT IN SOMEONE'S G-4HOME

CG3E RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM NON-FAMILY IN YOUR HOME G-4

CG3F RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM NON-FAMILY MEMBER IN HIS/HER HOME G-5

CG3G CHILDCARE PROVIDER LICENSED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA G-5

CG3RC TYPE OF CHILDCARE G-6

CG5 COULDN'T FIND CHILDCARE FOR A WEEK OR LONGER IN PAST 12 G-6MOS


CG6 MAIN REASON UNABLE TO FIND CHILDCARE G-7

CG14 # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER READS TO CHILD USUAL WEEK G-7

CG15 # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER PLAYS MUSIC/SINGS W/ CHILD USUAL G-8WEEK

CG16 # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER TAKES CHILD OUT SOMEWHERE G-8

CG39 PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD WILLING TO HELP G-9

CG40 PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD DON'T GET ALONG G-9

CG41 PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD CAN BE TRUSTED G-10

CG34 ADULTS IN NEIGHBORHOOD LOOK OUT FOR CHILDREN G-10

CG42 FEEL SAFE IN NEIGHBORHOOD G-11

AM36 DID VOLUNTEER WORK OR COMMUNITY SERVICES PAST YR G-11

SECTION H DEMOGRAPHICS, PART II H-1

LNGHMC_P1 LANGUAGES SPOKEN AT HOME (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-2

OMBSRCN_P1 OMB/CURRENT DOF RACE - ETHNICITY (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-2

RACECNC_P1 RACE - CENSUS 2000 DEFINITION (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-3

RACEDFC_P1 RACE - FORMER DOF RACE-ETHNICITY (PUF 1 YR RECODE) H-3

RACEH2C_P1 RACE - UCLA CHPR DEFINITION, UNABRIDGED (PUF 1 YR H-4RECODE)

CH18 SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ADULT LEVEL OF ENGLISH H-4PROFICIENCY: GE

INTVLNGC2_P1 LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW (PUF 1 YR RECODE v2) H-5

SECTION I HEALTH INSURANCE I-1

CF10A CHILD HAS SAME INS AS ADULT RESPONDENT I-1

CF14 CHILD COVERED FOR PRESCRIPTIONS I-2

CF21 HOW LONG SINCE CHILD LAST HAD HEALTH INS I-2

INS CURRENTLY INSURED I-3

INS12M MOS COVERED BY HEALTH PLANS LAST 12 MOS I-3

INS64 TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE - UNDER 65 I-4

INSANY ANY INS IN LAST 12 MOS I-4

INSEM COVERED BY EMPLOYER-BASED PLANS I-5


INSMD COVERED BY MEDI-CAL I-5

INSOG COVERED BY OTHER GOVT PLANS I-5

INSPR COVERED BY PLANS PURCHASED ON OWN I-6

INSTYPE TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE FOR ALL AGES I-6

INS9TP TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE FOR ALL AGES (9 I-7LVLS)

MA3 MAIN HEALTH PLAN IS HMO I-7

HMO HMO STATUS I-8

MA2_P NAME OF HEALTH PLAN (PUF RECODE) I-8

UNINSANY UNINSURED IN PAST 12 MOS I-9

SECTION O DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PART III, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION O-1


UR_IHS RURAL AND URBAN - IHS O-2

UR_OMB RURAL AND URBAN - OMB O-2

UR_RHP RURAL AND URBAN - RHP O-2

UR_BG6 RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY BLOCK GROUP)(6 LVLS) O-3


UR_TRACT6 RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY CENSUS TRACT) (6 LVLS) O-4

SECTION P FULL DESIGN & REPLICATE WEIGHT SERIES 0-80 P-1

RAKEDW0 CHIS2017 RAKED WEIGHT - FULL SAMPLE P-1
























RAKEDW80 CHIS2017 RAKED WEIGHT - REPLICATE 80 P-28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


SECTION Q: SCREENING INFORMATION


2018 CALIFORNIA HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEYCHILD SURVEY DATA DICTIONARY

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: PUF1Y_ID

LABEL: PUBLIC USE FILE ID - CHIS 1 YEAR DATAFILES

FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00

UNIVERSE: ALL CHILDREN

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: AGEGRP_A

LABEL: AGE GROUP OF ADULT

FREQ %VALUE: 1 <30 160 10.09

2 30-39 574 36.193 40-49 604 38.084 50-59 186 11.735 60+ 62 3.91

UNIVERSE: ALL PARENTS OF CHILDREN

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: AHEDTC_P1

LABEL: ADULT EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 NO FORMAL EDUCATION OR GRADE 1-8 90 5.67

2 GRADE 9-11 70 4.413 GRADE 12/H.S. DIPLOMA 304 19.174 SOME COLLEGE 197 12.425 AA/AS DEGREE OR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 175 11.037 BA OR BS DEGREE/SOME GRAD SCHOOL 429 27.059 MA OR MS DEGREE 181 11.4110 PH.D. OR EQUIVALENT 140 8.83

UNIVERSE: ALL ADULTS

INPUT VAR: AHEDUC

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CHEDU_P1

LABEL: EDUCATION LEVEL OF SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ADULT (PUF 1 YR REC

FREQ %VALUE: 1 NO FORMAL EDUCATION OR GRADE 1-8 88 5.55

2 GRADE 9-11 67 4.223 GRADE 12/H.S. DIPLOMA 290 18.284 SOME COLLEGE 197 12.425 AA/AS DEGREE OR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 178 11.227 BA OR BS DEGREE/SOME GRAD SCHOOL 446 28.129 MA OR MS DEGREE 187 11.7910 PH.D. OR EQUIVALENT 133 8.39


INPUT VAR: CHEDUCA

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: FAMSZ2_P1

LABEL: FAMILY SIZE: INCLUDES ALL PEOPLE SUPPORTED BY HH INCOME (PUF 1 YR

FREQ %VALUE: 1 2-3 572 36.07

2 4 581 36.633 5+ 433 27.30


INPUT VAR: FAM_SIZE2

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: FAMT4

LABEL: FAMILY TYPE (4 LVLS)

FREQ %VALUE: 3 MARRIED WITH KIDS 1270 80.08

4 SINGLE WITH KIDS 316 19.92


INPUT VAR: FAM_TYPE

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: HHSIZE_P1V2

LABEL: HOUSEHOLD SIZE (PUF 1 YR RECODE v2)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 2-3 422 26.61

2 4 559 35.253 5+ 605 38.15


INPUT VAR: HH_SIZE

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: POVGWD_P1

LABEL: FAMILY POVERTY THRESHOLD LEVEL (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

MEAN STATISTICSN 1586MIN 0MAX 5MEAN 2.98


INPUT VAR: POVGWD

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: POVLL

LABEL: POVERTY LEVEL

FREQ %VALUE: 1 0-99% FPL 241 15.20

2 100-199% FPL 306 19.293 200-299% FPL 224 14.124 300% FPL AND ABOVE 815 51.39


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: POVLL2_P1V2

LABEL: POVERTY LEVEL AS TIMES OF 100% FPL (PUF 17 RECODE v2)



INPUT VAR: POVLL2

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: POVLL_ACA

LABEL: FAMILY POVERTY THRESHOLD LEVEL: ACA MAGI ELIGIBILITY (4 LVLS)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 0-138% FPL 393 24.78

2 139%-249% FPL 276 17.403 250%-399% FPL 290 18.284 400%+ FPL 627 39.53


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: SRSEX_A

LABEL: GENDER (ADULT)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 MALE 624 39.34

2 FEMALE 962 60.66

UNIVERSE: ALL ADULTS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: SRTENR

LABEL: SELF-REPORTED HOUSEHOLD TENURE (HH)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 OWN 892 56.24

2 RENT/SOME OTHER ARRANGEMENT 694 43.76


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-6


SECTION A: DEMOGRAPHICS, PART I, HEALTHCONDITIONS



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CA17

LABEL: CURRENTLY NEEDS OR USES PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE

FREQ %VALUE: 1 YES 193 12.17

2 NO 1393 87.83


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA18

LABEL: NEEDS PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE FOR HEALTH CONDITION

FREQ %VALUE: -1 INAPPLICABLE 1393 87.83

1 YES 153 9.652 NO 40 2.52

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO NEED OR USE PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA19

LABEL: HEALTH CONDITION REQUIRING PRESCRIPTION LASTED 12 MOS OR MORE


1 YES 140 8.832 NO 13 0.82

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO NEED PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION BECAUSE OF A HEALTHCONDITION

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CA23

LABEL: NEEDS OR GETS SPECIAL THERAPY


2 NO 1440 90.79


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA24

LABEL: NEEDS THERAPY FOR HEALTH CONDITION


1 YES 85 5.362 NO 61 3.85

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO NEED OR GET SPECIAL THERAPY

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: SRSEX

LABEL: GENDER

FREQ %VALUE: 1 MALE 817 51.51

2 FEMALE 769 48.49


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CA42_P1

LABEL: CHILD ATTEND SCHOOL LAST WEEK (PUF 1-YR RECODE)


1 YES 773 48.742 NO 148 9.333 ON VACATION 136 8.58

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN AGE 5 AND OLDER

INPUT VAR: CA42

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA43_P

LABEL: CHILD ATTEND SCHOOL LAST SCHOOL YEAR (PUF RECODE)


1 YES 258 16.272 NO 26 1.64

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN AGE 5 AND OLDER WHO DID NOT ATTEND SCHOOL LAST WEEK

INPUT VAR: CA43

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: SRAGE_P

LABEL: AGE (PUF RECODE)



INPUT VAR: SRAGE

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: HGHTI_P

LABEL: HEIGHT - INCHES (PUF RECODE)



INPUT VAR: HGHTI

NOTES: TOPCODE=65; BOTTOMCODE=19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: HGHTM_P

LABEL: HEIGHT - METERS (PUF RECODE)



INPUT VAR: HGHTM

NOTES: TOPCODE=2; BOTTOMCODE=1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: WGHTK_P

LABEL: WEIGHT - KILOGRAMS (PUF RECODE)



INPUT VAR: WGHTK

NOTES: TOPCODE=68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: WGHTP_P

LABEL: WEIGHT - POUNDS (PUF RECODE)



INPUT VAR: WGHTP

NOTES: TOPCODE=150--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA14

LABEL: EVER BREASTFED OR FED BREAST MILK


1 YES 378 23.832 NO 36 2.27

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 3 YEARS AND UNDER

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-6



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CA16

LABEL: AGE WHEN STARTED SOLID FOODS


UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 3 YEARS AND UNDER EVER FED BREAST MILK

INPUT VAR:

NOTES: EXCLUDED VALUE "93" IN CALCULATING THE MEAN--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA6

LABEL: GENERAL HEALTH CONDITION

FREQ %VALUE: 1 EXCELLENT 905 57.06

2 VERY GOOD 408 25.733 GOOD 219 13.814 FAIR 46 2.905 POOR 8 0.50


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CA6_P1

LABEL: GENERAL HEALTH CONDITION (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 EXCELLENT 905 57.06

2 VERY GOOD 408 25.733 GOOD 219 13.814 FAIR OR POOR 54 3.40


INPUT VAR: CA6

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA12

LABEL: DOCTOR EVER TOLD YOU CHILD HAS ASTHMA


2 NO 1439 90.73


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA31

LABEL: STILL HAS ASTHMA


1 YES 101 6.372 NO 46 2.90

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN TOLD HAVE ASTHMA

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: ASTCUR

LABEL: CURRENT ASTHMA

FREQ %VALUE: 1 CURRENT ASTHMA 103 6.49

2 NO CURRENT ASTHMA 1483 93.51


INPUT VAR: CA12 CA31 CA32

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA34_P1

LABEL: MISSED SCHOOL DUE TO ASTHMA IN PAST 12 MOS (PUF 1-YR RECODE)


1 NO 98 6.182 YES 49 3.09

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN TOLD HAVE ASTHMA

INPUT VAR: CA34

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA35

LABEL: DOCTOR EVER GIVEN ASTHMA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CHILD


1 YES 114 7.192 NO 33 2.08

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO CURRENTLY HAVE ASTHMA OR HAD ASTHMA EPISODE IN PAST12 MOS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-9



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CA50

LABEL: HAVE WRITTEN COPY OF PLAN


1 YES 66 4.162 NO 48 3.03

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO CURRENTLY HAVE ASTHMA OR HAD ASTHMA EPISODE IN PAST12 MOS AND WHOSE DOCTOR DEVELOPED AN ASTHMA MANAGEMENT PLAN

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CA7

LABEL: CURRENT CONDITION LIMITING ABILITY TO DO AGE-APPROPRIATE THINGS


2 NO 1479 93.25


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A-10


SECTION B: DENTAL HEALTH



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC1B

LABEL: CHILD HAS ANY TEETH


1 YES 267 16.832 NO 58 3.66

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 2 YEARS AND YOUNGER

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC5B_P1V2

LABEL: HOW LONG SINCE CHILD LAST VISITED DENTIST (PUF RECODE v2)


0 HAS NEVER VISITED 202 12.741 LESS THAN 6 MONTHS AGO 1133 71.442 6 MOS TO 1 YR AGO 151 9.523 MORE THAN 1 YR AGO 42 2.65

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO HAVE TEETH

INPUT VAR: CC5B

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC7A

LABEL: INS PAYS FOR CHILD'S DENTAL CARE


1 YES 1348 84.992 NO 180 11.35

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 3-11 YEARS OF AGE AND CHILDREN 0-2 YEARS WITH TEETH

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: DNVST

LABEL: CHILD DENTAL VISIT PAST YEAR


1 YES 1284 80.962 NO 244 15.38

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN AGE 1 AND OLDER WHO HAVE TEETH

INPUT VAR: SRAGE CC5B

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CB23_P1

LABEL: MAIN REASON DID NOT VISIT DENTIST PAST YEAR (PUF 1 YR RECODE)


1 NO REASON TO GO/NO PROBLEMS 65 4.102 NOT OLD ENOUGH 97 6.123 COULD NOT AFFORD/NO INSURANCE 11 0.6991 OTHER 71 4.48

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN AGE 1 AND OLDER WHO HAVE TEETH AND HAVE NEVER VISITEDDENTIST OR VISITED OVER A YEAR AGO

INPUT VAR: CB23

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CB27

LABEL: CHILD COULDN'T GET NEEDED DENTAL CARE IN PAST 12 MOS


1 YES 67 4.222 NO 1461 92.12

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 3-11 YEARS OF AGE AND CHILDREN 0-2 YEARS WITH TEETH

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CB34B

LABEL: WHO PAYS FOR DENTAL INSURANCE


1 SELF OR FAMILY 418 26.362 RESPONDENT'S CURRENT OR FORMER EMPLOYER 286 18.033 SPOUSE'S CURRENT OR FORMER EMPLOYER OR U 213 13.434 SOMEONE OUTSIDE HOUSEHOLD 6 0.385 MEDICARE 7 0.446 MEDI-CAL (MEDICAID) DENTI-CAL 374 23.588 OTHER GOVERNMENT DENTAL PROGRAM 28 1.779 INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE 9 0.5710 COVERED CALIFORNIA 7 0.44

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO HAVE TEETH OR ARE OLDER THAN 2 YEARS OLD AND HAVEDENTAL INSURANCE THAT PAYS FOR ALL OR PART OF CARE

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC7BNEW

LABEL: USE FREE COMMUNITY OR PUBLIC DENTAL PROGRAMS


1 YES 119 7.502 NO 1409 88.84

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 2 YEARS OR OLDER OR YOUNGER CHILDREN WITH TEETH

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B-4


SECTION C: DIET, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, PARK USE



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC16B

LABEL: CHILD HAS USUAL DENTIST


1 YES 1238 78.062 NO 88 5.55

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN OVER 2 YEARS OLD OR YOUNGER CHILDREN WITH TEETH WHO HAVEEVER BEEN TO A DENTIST

INPUT VAR:

NOTES: COMPARABLE TO CHIS 2003; CHIS 2007 EXCLUDED CHILDREN < 1 YEARSWITH TEETH

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC17

LABEL: COULDN T AFFORD NEEDED DENTAL CARE IN PAST 12 MOS


1 YES 51 3.222 NO 1477 93.13

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN OVER 2 YEARS OLD OR YOUNGER CHILDREN WITH TOOTH

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC18B

LABEL: MISSED SCHOOL FOR DENTAL PROBLEM IN PAST 12 MOS


1 YES 51 3.222 NO 979 61.733 DOES NOT ATTEND SCHOOL 1 0.06

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 5+ YEARS WHO ATTEND SCHOOL

INPUT VAR:

NOTES: NOT COMPARABLE TO CC18 2003 (INCLUDED 4 YEAR OLDS) AND 2007. BOTHVERSIONS INCLUDED CHILDREN WHO WEREN'T CURRENTLY ATTENDINGSCHOOL/PRESCHOOL

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC13

LABEL: # OF SERVINGS OF FRUIT HAD YESTERDAY



INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC31

LABEL: # SERVINGS OF VEGETABLES HAD YESTERDAY



INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: FV5DAY2

LABEL: EAT FIVE OR MORE SERVING OF FRUITS & VEGETABLES


1 YES 397 25.032 NO 980 61.79


INPUT VAR: SRAGE CC13 CC31

NOTES: NOT TRENDABLE WITH CHIS 2011-2012; DOES NOT INCLUDE JUICECONSUMPTION

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC35

LABEL: # DAYS PHYS ACTIVE AT LEAST 60 MIN IN PAST WEEK



INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC36

LABEL: PARK/PLAYGROUND WITHIN 30 MINS WALKING DISTANCE OF HOME


1 YES 1345 84.802 NO 138 8.70


INPUT VAR:

NOTES: Caution trending with 2011 CC36 due to question differences--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC37

LABEL: BEEN TO PARK LAST 30 DAYS


1 YES 1388 87.522 NO 95 5.99


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC39

LABEL: CLOSEST PARK SAFE DURING DAY


1 STRONGLY AGREE 732 46.152 AGREE 633 39.913 DISAGREE 89 5.614 STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 1.83


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC40_P1

LABEL: # DAYS PAST WEEK WALKED HOME FROM SCHOOL (PUF 1 YR RECODE)


0 0 DAYS 750 47.291 1-2 DAYS 38 2.403 3-4 DAYS 59 3.725 5 DAYS 175 11.03

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 5 OR OLDER WHO ATTENDED SCHOOL LAST YEAR OR LAST WEEK ANDARE NOT HOME-SCHOOLED

INPUT VAR: CC40

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC43_P1

LABEL: # DAYS PAST WEEK BIKED HOME FROM SCHOOL (PUF 1 YR RECODE)


0 0 DAYS 955 60.211 1-2 DAYS 30 1.893 3-5 DAYS 37 2.33

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 5 OR OLDER WHO ATTENDED SCHOOL LAST YEAR OR LAST WEEK ANDARE NOT HOME-SCHOOLED

INPUT VAR: CC43

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC50

LABEL: # GLASSES OF SWEETENED FRUIT DRINKS DRANK YESTERDAY


UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 2 YEARS AND OLDER

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-6



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC51

LABEL: # DAYS PHYSICALLY ACTIVE 60+MINS IN TYPICAL WEEK



INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CC52

LABEL: TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVITIES (TV, COMP GAMES, TALK.W/FRIENDS) AF


UNIVERSE: CHILDREN OLDER THAN 1 YEARS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES: TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVITIES AFTER SCHOOL--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CC53

LABEL: TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVITIES (TV, COMP GAMES, TALK.W/FRIENDS) WK


UNIVERSE: CHILDREN OLDER THAN 1 YEARS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES: TIME DOING SITTING ACTIVTIES ON THE WEEKEND--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: AC42

LABEL: HOW OFTEN FIND FRESH FRUIT/VEG IN NEIGHB

FREQ %VALUE: 1 NEVER 62 3.91

2 SOMETIMES 113 7.123 USUALLY 116 7.314 ALWAYS 1288 81.216 DOESN'T SHOP FOR FRUITS AND VEGETABLES 1 0.067 DOESN'T SHOP IN HIS/HER NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0.38

UNIVERSE: ALL CHILD HOUSEHOLDS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: AC44

LABEL: NEIGHBORHOOD FRUIT/VEG AFFORDABLE


1 NEVER 23 1.452 SOMETIMES 279 17.593 USUALLY 425 26.804 ALWAYS 790 49.81

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLDS WHERE ADULTS REPORTED THEY CAN FIND FRESHFRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN NEIGHBORHOOD

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: FSLEV

LABEL: FOOD SECURITY STATUS LEVEL

FREQ %VALUE: -1 INAPPLICABLE - >=200% FPL 1039 65.51

1 FOOD SECURITY 320 20.182 FOOD INSECURITY W/O HUNGER 140 8.833 FOOD INSECURITY W/ HUNGER 87 5.49

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLDS WHERE ADULTS REPORTED TOTAL ANNUALHOUSEHOLD INCOME IS 200% FPL OR LESS

INPUT VAR: POVLL AM1 AM2 AM3 AM3A AM4 AM5 PROXY

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-9



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: FSLEVCB

LABEL: FOOD SECURITY STATUS (2 LVLS)

FREQ %VALUE: -1 INAPPLICABLE - >=200% FPL 1039 65.51

1 FOOD SECURITY 320 20.182 FOOD INSECURITY WITH/ WITHOUT HUNGER 227 14.31

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLDS WHERE ADULTS REPORTED TOTAL ANNUALHOUSEHOLD INCOME IS 200% FPL OR LESS

INPUT VAR: FSLEV

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-10


SECTION D: HEALTH CARE ACCESS & UTILIZATION



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CD1

LABEL: HAS USUAL PLACE FOR CHILD'S HEALTH CARE


2 NO 48 3.033 DOCTOR/HIS/HER DOCTOR 86 5.424 KAISER 38 2.405 MORE THAN ONE USUAL PLACE 2 0.13


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CD3

LABEL: KIND OF PLACE MOST OFTEN TAKE CHILD FOR HEALTH CARE


1 DOCTORS OFFICE/KAISER/OTHER HMO 1078 67.972 CLINIC/HEALTH CENTER/HOSPITAL CLINIC 433 27.303 EMERGENCY ROOM 25 1.5891 SOME OTHER PLACE 1 0.0694 NO ONE PLACE 1 0.06

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WITH USUAL SOURCE OF HEALTH CARE

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: USUAL5TP

LABEL: USUAL SOURCE OF CARE (5 LVLS)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 DOC OFFICE/HMO/KAISER 1117 70.43

2 COMMUN/GOV CLIN, COMMUN HOSP 394 24.843 EMERGENCY ROOM/URGENT CARE 25 1.584 OTHER PLACE/NO ONE PLACE 2 0.135 NO USUAL SOURCE OF CARE 48 3.03


INPUT VAR: CD1 CD3

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: USUAL

LABEL: HAVE USUAL PLACE TO GO TO WHEN SICK OR NEED HEALTH ADVICE


2 NO 48 3.03


INPUT VAR: CD1

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: USOC

LABEL: USUAL SOURCE OF CARE OTHER THAN ER


2 NO 73 4.60


INPUT VAR: USUAL5TP CD1

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: ACMDM_P1

LABEL: # OF DOCTOR VISITS PAST YEAR (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 0 0 TIMES 147 9.27

1 1 TIME 432 27.242 2 TIMES 337 21.253 3 TIMES 227 14.314 4 TIMES 151 9.525 5 TIMES 110 6.946 6-12 TIMES 156 9.849 13+ TIMES 26 1.64


INPUT VAR: ACMDNUM

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: DOCT_YR

LABEL: VISITED A DOCTOR DURING PAST 12 MOS


2 NO 147 9.27


INPUT VAR: CD6

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CD7

LABEL: HOW LONG SINCE LAST SAW MEDICAL DOCTOR


1 ONE YEAR AGO OR LESS 62 3.912 1 TO 2 YRS AGO 66 4.163 2 TO 3 YRS AGO 11 0.694 MORE THAN 3 YRS AGO 5 0.325 NEVER 3 0.19

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO HAVE NOT SEEN ANY KIND OF MEDICAL DOCTOR IN THE PAST12 MOS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CD12

LABEL: CHILD VISITED HOSPITAL ER IN PAST 12 MOS


2 NO 1306 82.35


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: ER

LABEL: ER VISIT WITHIN THE PAST YEAR


2 NO 1306 82.35


INPUT VAR: CD12 CA33 CA41

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CD31_P1

LABEL: LANGUAGE DOCTOR SPEAKS TO R (PUF 1 YR RECODE)


1 ENGLISH 416 26.232 SPANISH 127 8.013 ASIAN LANGUAGE OR OTHER (INCLUDING 2+ LA 25 1.58

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHOSE PARENTS DID NOT HAVE A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDINGDOCTOR AND INTERVIEW NOT CONDUCTED IN ENGLISH OR PARENTS SPEAKLANGUAGE OTHER THAN ENGLISH AT HOME

INPUT VAR: CD31

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-6



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CD33

LABEL: CHILD HAS PERSONAL DR AS MAIN PROVIDER


1 YES 1459 91.992 NO 79 4.98

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WITH USUAL SOURCE OF HEALTH CARE

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CE1

LABEL: DELAY/NOT GET PRES MEDICINE FOR CHILD IN PAST 12 MOS


2 NO 1545 97.41


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CE7

LABEL: DELAY/NOT GET MEDICAL CARE CHILD NEEDED PAST 12 MOS


2 NO 1556 98.11


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CE12

LABEL: COST OR LACK OF INS REASON PRESCRIPTION DELAYED/NOT RECVD


1 YES 18 1.132 NO 23 1.45

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO DELAYED OR NOT GET PRESCRIBED MEDICINE IN THE PAST 12MOS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CE13

LABEL: COST OR LACK OF INS REASON MEDICAL CARE DELAYED/NOT RECVD


1 YES 11 0.692 NO 19 1.20

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO DELAYED OR NOT GET NEEDED MEDICAL CARE IN THE PAST 12MOS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CD69

LABEL: HAD TROUBLE FINDING GENERAL DOC PAST 12 MOS


2 NO 1553 97.92


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CD70

LABEL: NOT ACCEPTED AS NEW PATIENT BY DOC PAST YR


2 NO 1544 97.35


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CD71

LABEL: HEALTH CARE COVERAGE NOT ACCEPTED BY DOC PAST YR


2 NO 1521 95.90


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-9



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CD36

LABEL: DR COORDINATES CARE WITH OTHER DRS


1 YES 137 8.642 NO 47 2.96

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO HAVE USUAL SOURCE OF CARE AND WITH A PERSONAL DOCTOROR HAD ASTHMA ATTACK IN PAST 12 MOS OR HAS PHYSICAL, BEHAVIORALMENTAL CONDITIONS THAT LIMIT ACTIVITIES

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D-10


SECTION E: PUBLIC PROGRAMS



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CE11C

LABEL: CHILD CURRENTLY ON WIC


1 YES 136 8.582 NO 299 18.85

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN AGE 6 AND YOUNGER IN FAMILY WITH INCOME LESS THAN OREQUAL TO 300% FPL

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

E-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CE11A

LABEL: CHILD RECEIVING FOOD STAMP BENEFITS


1 YES 192 12.112 NO 737 46.47

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN IN FAMILY WITH INCOME LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 300% FPL

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

E-2


SECTION F: PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT, CONCERNS,MENTAL HEALTH



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF40

LABEL: CHILD EVER RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT TEST


1 YES 1075 67.782 NO 408 25.73


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF41

LABEL: TEST INCLUDED ROLLING, PICKING UP OBJECTS, RECOGNIZING COLORS


1 YES 938 59.142 NO 545 34.36


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF42

LABEL: FILLED OUT CHECKLIST ABOUT CHILD LEARNING/BEHAVIOR CONCERNS


1 YES 793 50.002 NO 690 43.51


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF43

LABEL: FILLED OUT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL TASKS CHILD CAN DO


1 YES 791 49.872 NO 692 43.63


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF44

LABEL: ASKED ABOUT CONCERNS WITH LEARNING, DEVELOPMENT, BEHAVIOR OF CHIL


1 YES 910 57.382 NO 573 36.13


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF45

LABEL: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL CONCERNED THAT CHILD SHOULD BE MONITORED


1 YES 257 16.202 NO 1179 74.34

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN 1 YEARS AND OLDER NOT DIAGNOSED WITH ADD/ADHD,ASPERGER'S, AUTISM, DOWN'S SYNDROME, OR NON-DOWN'S MENTALRETARDATION

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF46

LABEL: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REFERRED CHILD TO SPECIALIST


1 YES 262 16.522 NO 1221 76.99


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF47

LABEL: PROF REFER FOR SPEECH, LANGUAGE, HEARING


1 YES 339 21.372 NO 1144 72.13


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF64

LABEL: HEARD MESSAGES ENCOURAGING TALKING, READING, SINGING WITH CHILD


1 YES 676 42.622 NO 125 7.88

UNIVERSE: HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN UNDER 6 YEARS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF65

LABEL: TALK WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER MESSAGE


1 LESS 3 0.192 ABOUT THE SAME 401 25.283 MORE 272 17.15

UNIVERSE: HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN UNDER 6 YEARS SEEING/HEARING MESSAGESABOUT TALKING/READING/SINGING TO CHILDREN

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF66

LABEL: SING WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER MESSAGE




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF67

LABEL: READ WITH CHILD SAME, LITTLE MORE, OR LOT MORE AFTER MESSAGE




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF35

LABEL: KNOWS STATE PROVIDES FREE PARENT KIT


2 NO 929 58.58


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF36

LABEL: EVER RECEIVED PARENT KIT


1 YES 365 23.012 NO 292 18.41

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHOSE PARENTS KNOW ABOUT FIRST 5 CAL FREE PARENT KIT

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-6



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CD57

LABEL: RECEIVED PARENT KIT THIS YEAR


1 YES 52 3.282 NO 313 19.74

UNIVERSE: PARENTS OF CHILDREN WHO EVER RECEIVED A " KIT FOR NEW PARENTS"FROM FIRST 5

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF39

LABEL: USED MATERIALS FROM PARENT KIT


1 YES 39 2.462 NO 13 0.82

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHOSE PARENTS KNOW ABOUT FIRST 5 CAL FREE PARENT KIT ANDRECEIVED ONE IN THE CURRENT YEAR

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF30

LABEL: CHILD HAS DIFFICULTIES WITH EMOT/ CONCENT/ BEHAV IN PAST 6 MOS


1 YES 269 16.962 NO 903 56.94


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF31_P1

LABEL: CHILD S EMOTIONAL DIFFICULTIES MINOR, DEFINITE OR SEVERE (PUF 1 Y


1 MINOR 165 10.402 DEFINITE/SEVERE 104 6.56

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN AGE 4 AND OLDER WHO HAVE DIFFICULTIES W/ EMOTIONS,CONCENTRATION, BEHAVIOR INTERACTIONS WITH PEOPLE

INPUT VAR: CF31

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF32

LABEL: CHILD RECEIVED PSYCH/EMOTIONAL COUNSELING IN PAST 12 MOS


1 YES 147 9.272 NO 1025 64.63


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-9


SECTION G: CHILD CARE & NEIGHBORHOODCOHESION



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG1

LABEL: HAVE REGULAR CHILDCARE 10 OR MORE HRS PER WEEK


2 NO 1028 64.82


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG2_P1

LABEL: # OF HRS CHILD IN CHILDCARE DURING TYPICAL WEEK (PUF 1 YR RECODE)


1 1-10 HOURS 112 7.0611 11-20 HOURS 194 12.2321 21-30 HOURS 76 4.7931 31-40 HOURS 129 8.1341 41+ HOURS 47 2.96

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO CURRENTLY HAVE REGULAR CHILD CARE FOR 10 HOURS ORMORE PER WEEK

INPUT VAR: CG2

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG3A

LABEL: RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM GRANDPARENT OR OTHER FAMILY MEMBER


1 YES 260 16.392 NO 263 16.58

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WITH REGULAR CHILDCARE FOR 10 HOURS OR MORE IN A TYPICALWEEK

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG3B

LABEL: RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM HEAD START OR STATE PRESCHOOL PROGRAM


1 YES 35 2.212 NO 302 19.04

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN 7 YEARS OLD WITH REGULAR CHILDCARE FOR 10 ORMORE IN A TYPICAL WEEK

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG3C

LABEL: RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM PRESCHOOL OR NURSERY SCHOOL


1 YES 130 8.202 NO 207 13.05

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN 7 YEARS OLD WITH REGULAR CHILDCARE FOR 10 ORMORE IN A TYPICAL WEEK

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG3D

LABEL: RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM CHILDCARE CENTER NOT IN SOMEONE'S HOME


1 YES 226 14.252 NO 297 18.73


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG3E

LABEL: RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM NON-FAMILY IN YOUR HOME


1 YES 80 5.042 NO 443 27.93


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG3F

LABEL: RECEIVE CHILDCARE FROM NON-FAMILY MEMBER IN HIS/HER HOME


1 YES 111 7.002 NO 412 25.98


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG3G

LABEL: CHILDCARE PROVIDER LICENSED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA


1 YES (ALL LICENSED) 113 7.122 NO (NONE LICENSED) 11 0.693 SOME LICENSED AND SOME NOT 1 0.06

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN W/ 10 HRS OR MORE REGULAR CHILDCARE PER WEEK AT ONE/MOREOF HEAD START, PRESCHOOL, NURSERY SCHOOL, CHILDCARE CTR NOT INSOMEONE'S HOME, NONFAMILY WHO CARES AT HIS/HER HOME

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG3RC

LABEL: TYPE OF CHILDCARE


1 GRANDPAR/OTHER FAM MEMBER 116 7.312 HEAD START/STATE PRGM 4 0.253 PRESCHOOL OR NURSERY SCHOOL 7 0.444 CHILDCARE CENTER 64 4.045 NON-FAM MEMB IN OWN HOME 17 1.076 NON-FAM MEMB IN HIS/HER HOME 39 2.467 OTHER ONE SOURCE 31 1.958 MORE THAN ONE SOURCE 245 15.45


INPUT VAR: CG3A CG3B CG3C CG3D CG3E CG3F

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG5

LABEL: COULDN'T FIND CHILDCARE FOR A WEEK OR LONGER IN PAST 12 MOS


1 YES 55 3.472 NO 699 44.07


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-6



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG6

LABEL: MAIN REASON UNABLE TO FIND CHILDCARE


1 COULDN'T AFFORD ANY CHILD CARE 13 0.822 COULDN'T FIND A PROVIDER WITH A SPACE 10 0.634 COULDN'T AFFORD QUALITY CHILDCARE 1 0.065 COULDN'T FIND QUALITY CHILDCARE 9 0.5791 OTHER REASON 22 1.39

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO COULD NOT FIND CHILDCARE WHEN NEEDED IN PAST 12 MOS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG14

LABEL: # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER READS TO CHILD USUAL WEEK


1 EVERY DAY 460 29.002 3-6 DAYS 126 7.943 1-2 DAYS 50 3.154 NEVER 16 1.01

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN AGE 5 AND YOUNGER

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG15

LABEL: # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER PLAYS MUSIC/SINGS W/ CHILD USUAL WEEK




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG16

LABEL: # OF DAYS FAMILY MEMBER TAKES CHILD OUT SOMEWHERE




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG39

LABEL: PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD WILLING TO HELP

FREQ %VALUE: 1 STRONGLY AGREE 426 26.88

2 AGREE 916 57.793 DISAGREE 189 11.924 STRONGLY DISAGREE 54 3.41


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG40

LABEL: PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD DON'T GET ALONG




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-9



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG41

LABEL: PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD CAN BE TRUSTED




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CG34

LABEL: ADULTS IN NEIGHBORHOOD LOOK OUT FOR CHILDREN


2 AGREE 916 57.793 DISAGREE 213 13.444 STRONGLY DISAGREE 46 2.905 NOT APPLICABLE 25 1.58


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-10



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CG42

LABEL: FEEL SAFE IN NEIGHBORHOOD

FREQ %VALUE: 1 ALL OF THE TIME 780 49.21

2 MOST OF THE TIME 633 39.943 SOME OF THE TIME 151 9.534 NONE OF THE TIME 21 1.32


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: AM36

LABEL: DID VOLUNTEER WORK OR COMMUNITY SERVICES PAST YR


2 NO 697 43.95

UNIVERSE: CHILD FIRST INTERVIEW AND WHERE SCREENER RESPONDENT IS THESUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGABLE ADULT

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G-11


SECTION H: DEMOGRAPHICS, PART II



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: LNGHMC_P1

LABEL: LANGUAGES SPOKEN AT HOME (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 ENGLISH 920 58.01

2 SPANISH 134 8.453 OTHER ASIAN OR NON-ASIAN LANGUAGE 36 2.278 ENGLISH & SPANISH 320 20.189 ENGLISH & CHINESE 23 1.4510 ENGLISH & ONE OTHER LANGUAGE 112 7.0613 OTHER TWO OR MORE LANGUAGES 41 2.59


INPUT VAR: LANGHOME

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: OMBSRCN_P1

LABEL: OMB/CURRENT DOF RACE - ETHNICITY (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 HISPANIC 647 40.79

2 WHITE, NON-HISPANIC (NH) 590 37.203 AFRICAN AMERICAN ONLY, NOT HISPANIC 71 4.484 OTHER RACE 26 1.645 ASIAN ONLY, NH 115 7.257 TWO OR MORE RACES, NH 137 8.64


INPUT VAR: OMBSRREO

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

H-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RACECNC_P1

LABEL: RACE - CENSUS 2000 DEFINITION (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 OTHER SINGLE RACE 176 11.10

3 ASIAN 131 8.264 AFRICAN AMERICAN 96 6.055 WHITE 992 62.557 MORE THAN ONE RACE 191 12.04


INPUT VAR: RACECEN

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RACEDFC_P1

LABEL: RACE - FORMER DOF RACE-ETHNICITY (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 LATINO 647 40.79

2 NON-LATINO PI, AIAN, OTHER ONE RACE, OR 27 1.704 NON-LATINO ASIAN 115 7.255 NON-LATINO AFR. AMER. 71 4.486 NON-LATINO WHITE 589 37.148 NON-LATINO, TWO+ RACES 137 8.64


INPUT VAR: RACEDOF

NOTES: BASED ON '01 DEPT OF FINANCE DEFIN. CURRENT RACEDOF SEE OMBSRREO.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

H-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RACEH2C_P1

LABEL: RACE - UCLA CHPR DEFINITION, UNABRIDGED (PUF 1 YR RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 LATINO 362 22.82

4 ASIAN 143 9.025 AFRICAN AMERICAN 100 6.316 WHITE 753 47.487 OTHER SINGLE OR MULTIPLE RACE 228 14.38


INPUT VAR: RACEHPR2

NOTES: NOT FOR DIRECT COMPARISON TO RACEHPR OF PREVIOUS CYCLES--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CH18

LABEL: SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ADULT LEVEL OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY: GE


1 VERY WELL 356 22.452 WELL 143 9.023 NOT WELL 107 6.754 NOT AT ALL 60 3.78

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO SPEAK TWO OR MORE LANGUAGES AT HOME

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

H-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: INTVLNGC2_P1

LABEL: LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW (PUF 1 YR RECODE v2)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 ENGLISH 1381 87.07

2 SPANISH/OTHER 205 12.93


INPUT VAR: INTVLNGC2

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

H-4


SECTION I: HEALTH INSURANCE



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF10A

LABEL: CHILD HAS SAME INS AS ADULT RESPONDENT

FREQ %VALUE: -8 DON'T KNOW 2 0.13

-1 INAPPLICABLE 105 6.621 YES 1207 76.102 NO 272 17.15

UNIVERSE: ALL CHILDREN WITH ADULT RESPONDENT WHO HAS HEALTH INSURANCE

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: CF14

LABEL: CHILD COVERED FOR PRESCRIPTIONS


2 NO 97 6.12

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WHO ARE INSURED

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: CF21

LABEL: HOW LONG SINCE CHILD LAST HAD HEALTH INS


1 1 TO 3 YRS AGO 2 0.132 MORE THAN 3 YRS AGO 3 0.193 NEVER HAD HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE 5 0.32

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WITH NO HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE THROUGHOUT THE PAST 12MONTHS

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: INS

LABEL: CURRENTLY INSURED


2 NO 20 1.26


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: INS12M

LABEL: MOS COVERED BY HEALTH PLANS LAST 12 MOS



INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: INS64

LABEL: TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE - UNDER 65

FREQ %VALUE: 1 UNINSURED 20 1.26

2 MEDI-CAL (MEDICAID) 565 35.625 EMPLOYMENT-BASED 910 57.386 PRIVATELY PURCHASED 67 4.227 OTHER PUBLIC 24 1.51


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: INSANY

LABEL: ANY INS IN LAST 12 MOS

FREQ %VALUE: 1 CURRENTLY UNINSURED 20 1.26

2 UNINS. ANY PAST 12 MO 19 1.203 INSURED ALL PAST 12 MO 1547 97.54


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: INSEM

LABEL: COVERED BY EMPLOYER-BASED PLANS


2 NO 620 39.09


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: INSMD

LABEL: COVERED BY MEDI-CAL


2 NO 1021 64.38


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: INSOG

LABEL: COVERED BY OTHER GOVT PLANS


2 NO 1548 97.60


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: INSPR

LABEL: COVERED BY PLANS PURCHASED ON OWN


2 NO 1514 95.46


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: INSTYPE

LABEL: TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE FOR ALL AGES


5 MEDICAID 564 35.567 EMPLOYMENT-BASED 910 57.388 PRIVATELY PURCHASED 68 4.299 OTHER PUBLIC 24 1.51


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-6



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: INS9TP

LABEL: TYPE OF CURRENT HEALTH COVERAGE SOURCE FOR ALL AGES (9 LVLS)


4 MEDICAID + EMPLOYER-BASED 56 3.535 MEDICAID (NO EMPLOYER-BASED) 508 32.037 EMPLOYER BASED (NO MEDICARE OR MEDICAID) 910 57.388 PRIVATE PURCHASE 68 4.299 OTHER PUBLIC 24 1.51


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: MA3

LABEL: MAIN HEALTH PLAN IS HMO


1 YES 744 46.912 NO 821 51.77

UNIVERSE: CHILD WHO ARE INSURED

INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: HMO

LABEL: HMO STATUS

FREQ %VALUE: 1 HMO 746 47.04

2 NON-HMO 820 51.703 UNINSURED 20 1.26


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: MA2_P

LABEL: NAME OF HEALTH PLAN (PUF RECODE)

FREQ %VALUE: -9 NOT ASCERTAINED 2 0.13

-8 DON'T KNOW 20 1.26-7 REFUSED 2 0.13-1 INAPPLICABLE 20 1.261 KAISER 319 20.112 BLUE CROSS 290 18.283 UNITED HEALTHCARE (FORMER PACIFICARE) 85 5.364 BLUE SHIELD 136 8.585 HEALTH NET 56 3.536 AETNA 50 3.157 CIGNA HEALTH CARE 34 2.148 OTHER 572 36.07

UNIVERSE: CHILDREN WITH HEALTH INSURANCE

INPUT VAR: MA2

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: UNINSANY

LABEL: UNINSURED IN PAST 12 MOS

FREQ %VALUE: 1 UNINSURED ALL YEAR 11 0.69

2 UNINSURED PART YEAR 28 1.773 INSURED ALL YEAR 1547 97.54


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-9


SECTION O: DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PARTIII, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: UR_CLRT2

LABEL: RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY ZIPCODE) (2 LVLS)

FREQ %VALUE: 1 URBAN 1290 81.34

2 RURAL 296 18.66


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: UR_IHS

LABEL: RURAL AND URBAN - IHS


2 RURAL 710 44.77


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: UR_OMB

LABEL: RURAL AND URBAN - OMB

FREQ %VALUE: 1 METROPOLITAN 1451 91.49

2 NON-METROPOLITAN 135 8.51


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: UR_RHP

LABEL: RURAL AND URBAN - RHP


2 RURAL 254 16.02


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: UR_BG6

LABEL: RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY BLOCK GROUP)(6 LVLS)


2 2ND CITY 170 10.723 MIXED 232 14.634 SUBURBAN 272 17.155 TOWN 195 12.306 RURAL 167 10.53


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: UR_CLRT6

LABEL: RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY ZIPCODE) (6 LVLS)




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: UR_TRACT6

LABEL: RURAL AND URBAN - CLARITAS (BY CENSUS TRACT) (6 LVLS)




INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O-4


SECTION P: FULL DESIGN & REPLICATE WEIGHTSERIES 0-80



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW0

LABEL: CHIS2017 RAKED WEIGHT - FULL SAMPLE

FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW1

LABEL: CHIS2017 RAKED WEIGHT - REPLICATE 1

FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW2


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW3


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-2



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW4


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW5


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW6


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-3



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW7


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW8


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW9


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW10


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW11


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW12


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-5



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW13


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW14


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW15


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-6



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW16


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW17


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW18


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW19


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW20


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW21


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW22


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW23


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW24


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-9



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW25


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW26


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW27


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-10



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW28


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW29


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW30


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-11



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW31


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW32


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW33


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-12



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW34


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW35


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW36


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-13



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW37


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW38


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW39


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-14



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW40


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW41


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW42


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-15



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW43


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW44


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW45


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-16



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW46


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW47


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW48


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-17



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW49


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW50


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW51


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-18



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW52


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW53


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW54


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-19



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW55


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW56


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW57


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-20



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW58


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW59


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW60


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-21



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW61


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW62


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW63


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-22



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW64


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW65


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW66


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-23



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW67


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW68


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW69


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-24



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW70


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW71


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW72


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-25



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW73


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW74


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW75


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-26



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW76


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW77


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW78


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P-27



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------VARNAME: RAKEDW79


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VARNAME: RAKEDW80


FREQ %VALUE: . 0 - HIGH 1586 100.00


INPUT VAR:

NOTES:

P-28
