childhood obesity and iowa schools
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given by Ruth Litchfield, ISU Extension to Regional School Work Group in January 2009.TRANSCRIPT
Weighty Issues:
Why and How Schools Should Be Involved
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1985
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1990
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1995
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2000
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2001
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2002
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2003
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2004
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2005
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Iowa
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2006
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5’ 4” person)
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Iowa
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2007
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5’ 4” person)
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/
Iowa
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
What About NE Iowa?
Iowa Allamakee
Clayton Fayette Howard Winneshiek
Overweight
37.3% 38.2 38.1 37.8 38.2 35.9
Obese 22.5% 23.2 23.2 22.8 23.0 21.5
Source: http://facits.idph.state.ia.us/facits/
One in two children (ages 6-19) in the U.S. is overweight (obese) or at risk of
overweight (overweight)
Children and Weight
Overweight/Obese Trends
0
5
10
15
20
25
6-11 year old girls
12-19 year old girls
6-11 year old boys
12-19 year old boysPerc
en
tag
e
JAMA 2002, 2004, 2006
What About Iowa Youth?
Source: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, 2007
National Iowa
Obese Females9.6% 8.8%
Overweight Females 15.1% 10.6%
Obese Males16.3% 13.7%
Overweight Males 16.4% 16.2%
Obese Total 13.0% 11.3%
Overweight Total
15.8% 13.5%
What about NE Iowa?
Iowa Allamakee
Clayton Fayette
Overweight85-95%
17.5% 15.7% 19.8% 23.4%
Obese>95%
14.9% 15.7% 14.9% 12.9%
Source: Iowa WIC programhttp://www.idph.state.ia.us/wic/common/pdf/2007_pednss_county.pdf
Weighty Costs
• $40 billion spent on health clubs, diet soda, diet books and videos, artificial sweetener, weight loss centers and liquid diets
• Medical expenditures related to obesity – United States - $75 billion – Iowa - $783 million
• Weight-associated hospital costs for children more than tripled between 1979 and 1999
Excessive weight gain in childhood precedes adult obesity
and related problems.
Overweight children are 43.5 times more likely to have at least 3 cardiovascular risk
factors.
HEALTH HAZARDS AHEAD
Source: Nicklas (2001) Journal of the American College of Nutrition 20(6): 599-608
Children’s Eating Habits• 2% of kids meet all Food Guide Pyramid Recommendations
– 16% do not meet any recommendations– 40% meet only one or none
• More than – 84% of kids eat too much fat– 91% eat too much saturated fat
• Less than– 15% get enough fruits– 20% get enough vegetables– 30% get enough milk
Source: Munoz et al. (1997) Pediatrics 100(3):323-329
Children’s Eating Habits
• Over 50% of snacks eaten by American children are cookies, desserts, potato chips, salty snacks, candy and gum.
• Only 16% of snacks are fruits -- and only 1% of snacks are veggies.
• American children eat only half the recommended five daily servings of fruits and vegetables. (only about 1 in 5 kids get 5-A-Day)
• The most common vegetables eaten by children are French fries, ketchup and pizza sauce. (of the vegetables eaten by 6-11 year olds approximately 55 to 60% come from potatoes or tomatoes)
• Children have especially low intakes of nutrient rich dark green leafy and deep yellow veggies.
Media and marketing issues
• $2 billion in marketing towards children annually
• Average TV time = 526 commercials per day• Ronald McDonald is 2nd only to Santa Claus in
recognition• $ spent on fast food is greater than movies,
books, magazines, newspapers, videos and recorded music combined
Source: Food, Fun ‘n Fitness, Friesz 2002
Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization
Section 204 of P.L. 108-265June 30, 2004
Wellness policies
Nutrition guidelines selected by the local educational agency for all food available on each school campus under the local educational agency during the school day with the objectives of promoting student health and reducing childhood obesity.
• School meals guidelines meet the DGA, these nutrition guidelines are for foods available outside of the school meals programs.
Foods of Minimal Nutritional Value
• Criteria for food sold outside of meals in the food service area during mealtimes
• Restricts the sale of foods providing less than 5% of the RDI for eight specified nutrients
What’s in, what’s out?
• Fruitaides• French fries• Ice cream candy
bars• Cookies• Chips• Snack cakes• Doughnuts
• Seltzer water• Caramel corn• Popsicles• Jelly beans• Chewing gum• Lollipops• Cotton candy• Breath mints
Legislative activity
• Child Nutrition Promotion and School Lunch Protection Act (federal)– Updates Foods of Minimal Nutritional Value
and establishes federal-level nutrition standards
• Healthy Kids Act (state)– Establishes state-level nutrition standards
Institute of Medicine Nutrition Report
• Standards for Foods in Schools– Congress directive– April 25, 2007– Foods should be consistent with the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans 2005
IOM Report – Tier 1 foods
• Available to all students throughout the day
• Must provide 1 serving of fruit, vegetable, whole grain or nonfat/low-fat dairy
• < 200 calories
• < 35% total calories from fat• < 10% total calories from sat. fat• < 0.5 gm trans fat • < 35% calories from total sugars• < 200 mg sodium
IOM Report - Tier 2 foods
• Available ONLY to high school students AFTER school
• Do NOT provide a serving of fruit, vegetable, whole grain or nonfat/low-fat dairy
• < 200 calories• Same fat, sugar, sodium criteria as Tier 1
School Foods Report Card
• Iowa received an ‘F’ • Based on food/beverage policy outside
of the school lunch program– Beverage nutrition standards– Food nutrition standards– Grade level(s) impacted– Coverage of school day time– Location in school impacted
Institute of Medicine 9/14/06
• School boards, administrators, and staff should elevate the priority that is placed on creating and sustaining a healthy school environment and advance school policies and program that support this priority.
• Schools and school districts should conduct self-assessments to enhance and sustain a healthy school environment, and mechanisms for examining links between changes in the school environment and behavioral and health outcomes should be explored.
Should schools be in the health business?
Mean scale scores in English–language arts by fitness standards achieved.
311
316
322
327
333
342
355
300
306
314
320
326
336
350
304
309
317
322
329
339
352
290
300
310
320
330
340
350
360
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Overall PFT Score
CS
T E
LA
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
300
308
316
322
330
342
361
294
300
308
315
322
334
350
317319
324
330
336
346
358
280
290
300
310
320
330
340
350
360
370
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Overall PFT Score
CS
T M
ath
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9 Students Who Took CST Geometry
Mean scale scores in mathematics by fitness standards achieved.
Nutrition: Breakfast Studies
• Iowa Breakfast Study (1960’s)• Maryland Breakfast Study (2001)• Minnesota (1998)
– Tardiness and absences– Suspensions – Test Scores – Attention and Behavior
Nutrition: Florida (1990)
• 12 weeks • Students were required to:
– Eat a nutritious breakfast each morning
– Limit sugar intake
– Eat nutritious snacks
– Eat more fruits, vegetables, whole-grain and protein-rich foods
– Attend nutrition education classes 2 to 3 times/week
Nutrition Outcomes (Florida 1990)
Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) scores
Classroom behavior
Nutrition quiz scores
Making it Happen
• ↓ Lunchroom discipline problems (183 vs 36)• ↓ After-lunch referrals to the principal
(96 vs 22)• ↑ Attentiveness/behavior after lunch ↑ 10 minutes of
instruction time (30 hours per year)• 12 of 13 reporting fiscal impact reported improved
or same bottom line
Success Stories– Establish nutrition standards for
competitive foods– Influence food and beverage contracts– Make more healthful foods and
beverages available– Adopt marketing techniques to promote
healthful choices– Limit student access to competitive foods– Use fundraising activities and rewards
that support student health
. . . and justice for all
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Many materials can be made available in alternative formats for ADA clients. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Stanley R. Johnson, director, Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa.
Prepared by: • Ruth Litchfield, Nutrition Extension Specialist, ISU
Contributions by:• Barbara Anderson, Extension Field Specialist,
Wapello Co.• Pat Anderson, Extension Field Specialist, West
Pottawattamie Co.• Patricia Steiner, Extension Field Specialist, Des
Moines Co.