chess on the board 2011 (accre test)

8/3/2019 Chess on the Board 2011 (Accre Test)

1/9

CHESS ON THE BOARD 2011 ADJUDICATOR ACCREDITATION

WRITING TESTMaximum Score (100) :

1. Adjudication Sheet (17%)2. Essay (28%)3. True and False (15%)4. Multiple Choices (40%)

(60 MINUTES)

NAME : ____________ INSTITUTION : ____________


2/9

A. Adjudication Sheet

ROOM :______, ROUND :______ MOTION : _____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

TEAM NAME SCORE TOTAL

OG PMDPM

OO LODLO

CGMGGW

CO MOOW

RANK TEAM VP SCORE1 32 23 14 0

BEST SPEAKER : _____________________________________

Speaker Marks

GRADE A 95-90Unorthodox, Unique, Incredibly StructurizeSophistication on words, Trophy worthy

GRADE B 89-80Really Engaging Argument, Response, ExamplesReally Compelling, Convincing, GF/SF worthy

GRADE C 79-70 Average-ish, need more attempt to ellaborateSufficient clarity, understandable, Engaging

GRADE D 69-60Below Average, Less Understandable,Less Engagement, Less Contribution

GRADE E 59-50Open mouth statue, only say greetingSupport their opponent, trashy

*OG = Opening Government*OO = Opening Opposition*CG = Closing Government*CO = Closing Opposition


3/9

B. EssayWrite down your brief analysis toward the debate and also give your reason behind yourdecision toward the rank of each team!

___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________


4/9

Please assess these explanations!

THW Legalize ProstitutionFirst speaker of affirmative team argued:We should legalize prostitution because it will create protection for women. The governmentshould be a protector of all part of society especially women. In many cases women can t work

as physical labors, taxi drivers, or construction workers. There is a limitation of job vacancy for women which forces them to resort to prostitution, for the job field is open as well as lucrative. This way, women will be able to get jobs and income to sustain the living of the family, especiallyif these women are single parents. Of course, the government will provide facilities in thelocalization to protect the working prostitutes. Second speaker of the affirmative argued:Women in all type of jobs should get governmental protection. We would like to localize theprostitutions in one place. This place will be controlled by government, equipped with clinics in

which prostitutes can do health checkup periodically using free government-issued insurancepolicies. Condom promotion as well as education about STD spread will be continuallyproliferated to build a better inner awareness of health risks. Prostitutes will be able to reportclients who refuse to wear protections or physically abusive.

THW Allow Gay Couple to Adopt Children The first speaker of negative argued:Government should not allow gay couple to adopt children because they would not be the bestparents for their children, it will bring negative repercussion towards children s mentaldevelopment.Gay couple would not be the best parents for their chi ldren because children can t see mothers

figures in gay couples and fathers figures in lesbian couples. Aside from that, it will bring negative effects towards children s mental development in two ways, first is because they will be discriminated and bullied by their friends and society in generasimple because their parents are gay, and the second is the children will also be gay because theyimitate their parents, these conditions is bad for children s mental development.

THW Send Bullies to JailBullies are horrible. Bullies do many dehumanizing things, and we can see similarities betweebullies and murderers. A highschooler in Little Rock, Arizona, killed himself by hanging himselbecause he was bullied by his friends in the school: bowls of soup are poured over his head

everyday, his head is forced into the toilet, he s forced to steal things, he is called by derogatory names, he s forced to do indecent sexual activities, and he s constantly beaten with fists andsometimes even baseball bats. The bullying is the one causing this poor kid s death. So, it isjustifiable for a government to send bullies to jail, because we always do it to every murderer inour society.


5/9

THW make voting compulsoryVoting in election is really important. It coul d be used as a bridge for government and people inone country. There is already a political demand from the society to vote, especially because

voting is very important. The state s government should extend this by making voting compulsory, in order to cr eate social awareness of the country s future. The awareness towardspolitical leaders and policies is really important in a democratic government. The democracy

system basically lies on the spirit of people s interest, thus it is important to express the iraspiration. In order to achieve this goal, it is justified to make people actively engage in one of the most important political event of a democratic society, which is voting in elections.


6/9


7/9

D. Multiple Choice TULIS PENJELASAN!!! DESKRPSI DAN CARA MENJAWAB!!!

Determine the Rank Fulfill Adjudication Sheet

Determine Initial Rank Give Verbal Adjudication Making Consensus Take vote (if it necessary) Take a break Take a photo Facebook-ing Determine the score Give adjudication sheet to runner

Please write down above step in correct order _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________

1. All of the statement bellow regarding the criteria of a good adjudicator is correct, except :a. The adjudicator knows general occurrences of today s worlds b. The adjudicator must weight content weightier than fulfillment of speaker s roles c. Adjudicators must insert any further interpretation of argument which provided by speakersd. The adjudicator must be capable to assess flaws in arguments

2. These are the function of a substantive material (an argument), except:a. Provides analysis proving the virtue of a claim.b. Directly refutes an opponent s point. c. Proving the relevance of a philosophical theory.d. Analyzing a case study.

3. These are description of extension, except: a. An extension is new constructive argumentb. Deeper/wider (better) analysis of an argument that has already been madec. Rebuttal can count as new material, and may indeed be sufficiently important to be credited as

extensiond. An extension must be a substantial contribution to the debate, which clearly distinguishes you fromthe team that preceded you

4. The Opening Government team must provide a detailed policy when debating under the motion ThisHouse Believes That Prostitution should be prohibited a. Yes, if they didn t I will penalize them b. Yes, cause probably the opposition bench will question how proposition conduct this policy c. No, i don t think that s necessary d. No, it depends on Opening Government to run this debate to principle debate or practical debate

5. Whip speaker are highly discourage to bring new materiala. Yes, if they did i will penalize them


8/9

b. Yes for Opposition Whip but for Government Whip, they can still bring new material but it shouldbe in small and light portion

c. No, we should let Whip speaker to explore their speech including bring new materiald. No, it s not fair for whip speaker

6. We should penalize speaker who don t offer or accept any Point of Information (POI) a. Yes, due to this disrespect actionb. Yes, POI is fundamental constituent in BP style, and POI also contributes to individual score or even

determination of team s rank c. No, we can t compel speaker to accept or offer POI d. No, the most important matter that we should asses is their substantial matter or extension, POI only

be credited when it have contribution in the debate.Orthodox Argument, Less effective analysis, incomplete elaboration, relevancies of someevidence or examples are still questionable, Orthodox response Sufficient clarity, Understandable, Quite Engaging

7. With above description, the speaker deserve to get :a. 76 80b. 71 75c. 80 85d. 68 71

Provide summary (for 1 st half of the debate)Giving Rebuttal Provide New Substantial Matter

8. Above are the structure of :a. Member of Governmentb. Member of Oppositionc. Government Whipd. Deputy Leader of Opposition

9. Which of these elements below does not constitute scoring for a speaker s style? a. Mispronunciationb. Incredible grammatical errorc. Gestured. Speaking overtime

10. The 2010 UNFCC was held ina. Kyotob. Boliviac. Cancund. Haiti

11. Theory of justice that considers that punishment, if proportionate, is a morally acceptable response tocrime, with an eye to the satisfaction and psychological benefits it can bestow to the aggrieved party, itintimates and society is theory of:a. Retributive Justiceb. Social Justicec. Rehabilitative Justiced. Restorative Justice

12. Act of attempting to convert people to another opinion and, particularly, another religion. a. Preaching
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_justicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_justicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punishmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_for_an_eyehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_conversionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_conversionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_for_an_eyehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punishmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_justice


9/9

b. Proselytismc. Celibacy d. Apostasy

13. The tort of acting intentionally and voluntarily causing the reasonable apprehension of an immediatharmful or offensive contacta. Self-Defense

b. Negligencec. Assaultd. Nuisance

14. A rise in the general level of prices of goods and services in an economy over a period of time.a. Deflationb. Inflationc. Economic Repercussiond. Contraction

15. A form of government in which a few of the most famous citizens rule

a.

Demarchy b. Corporatocracy c. Aristocracy d. Ethnocracy

16. A system of moral principles that apply values and judgments to the practice of medicine, commonlycalled as:a. Non-maleficenceb. Beneficencec. Medical Ethicsd. Autonomy

17. A permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and thecrime of aggression (although it cannot currently exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression)a. ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Right)b. ICC (International Criminal Court)c. ICJ (International Court of Justice)d. United States Court
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_levelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_of_governmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribunalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_humanityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_aggressionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_aggressionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_humanityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribunalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_of_governmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_levelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort

chess on the board 2011 (accre test)

Documents