characterization of silt/sand soils - isc’5€¦ ·  · 2016-09-23characterization of silt/sand...

50
CHARACTERIZATION OF SILT/SAND SOILS An-Bin Huang, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University Hsin Chu, TAIWAN

Upload: vuonganh

Post on 21-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

CHARACTERIZATION OF

SILT/SAND SOILS

An-Bin Huang, Ph.D., P.E.

Department of Civil Engineering

National Chiao Tung University

Hsin Chu, TAIWAN

AB Huang 2

What is silt/sand (M/S) soil?

•Sand, silty sand, sandy silt, silt

•Well mixed, layered

•With occasional clay layers

AB Huang 32016/9/8

Clean sand vs sand+silt

•Dilatancy or compressibility

•Permeability

•Sampling

AB Huang 4

Test sites and origin of soils

AB Huang 5

Issues of interests

• Interpretation of CPT

•Effects of fines on undrained cyclic strength of M/S soils

•Natural versus reconstituted

• Fines content adjustment in simplified procedure

•Ground subsidence & design of piles

AB Huang 6

Characteristics of Mai Liao Soil (MLS)

AB Huang 7

Mineral Coarse, % Fines, %

Quartz 75.4 20.0

Clinochlore 10.9 29.4

Muscovite 8.6 48.1

Feldspar 5.1 5.1

Grain characteristics of MLS

•Alluvial soil from central mountain range.

•Parental rock• Sandstone

• Shale

• Slate

• Schist

• Mudstone

AB Huang 8

Grain size distribution of MLS

AB Huang 9

Comparison with binary packing

AB Huang 10

DEM data from Ng et al. (2016)

FC = 0%

FC = 30%

FC = 50%

LAB TESTS ON RECONSTITUTED SPECIMENSSoil element tests

CPT calibration tests

AB Huang 11

Factors considered

•Fines contents

•Densities

•Stress states

•Specimen preparation methods –

• Moist Tamping (MT)

• Water Sedimentation (WS)

• Dry Deposition (DD)

• Moist Pluviation (MP)

AB Huang 12

Iso-consolidation on MLS specimens prepared by MT method

AB Huang 13

(Huang & Chuang, 2011)

e vs cyclic resistance ratio

AB Huang 14

MLS specimens made by WS method

Use of equivalent void ratio e*

AB Huang 15

𝑒∗ =𝑒 + 1 − 𝑏 𝐹𝐶

1 − 1 − 𝑏 𝐹𝐶

(Thevanayagam, 2000)

𝑏 ≈ 0.6

(Huang & Chuang, 2011)

e* based critical state line

AB Huang 16

State parameter Ψ vs CRR

AB Huang 17

Ψ∗ vs CRR

AB Huang 18

CPT calibration tests in MLS

19

(Huang and Hsu, 2004)

Compare w/ NC, clean, uniform quartz sands

AB Huang 20

(after Jamiolski et al., 1985; Mayne, 2006)

Compare w/ other sands

AB Huang 21

Effects of pore pressure on qT

AB Huang 22

Specimens by mist pluviation (MP)

AB Huang 23

Compressed air

Pluviator

Unit: mm

Nozzle

Dry sand

(Huang et al., 2015)

Comparison of CTX test results

AB Huang 24

(Huang et al., 2015)

Calibration chamber specimens by MP method

AB Huang 25

MP chamber specimen

AB Huang 26

UNDISTURBED SAMPLING

AB Huang 27

Laval sampling

AB Huang 28

Dimensions in mm

273

218

60

0

12

44

302

Section A-A

Rod B.Q. wire line

drilling rod

Collar

Locking pin

Internal guide

Overcoring tube

Internal guide

Steel teeth and cuttersHead valve

External guide

Sampling tube

Carbon steel ZW pipe

Steel teeth and cutters

AA

(La Rochelle et al., 1981)

Laval sampling & uni-directional freezinig

AB Huang 29

(Konrad et al., 1995)

Expelled water & temp. vs time

AB Huang 30

Vs1 profiles at Yuan Lin site

31

Comparison of CTX results

AB Huang 32

Gel-push sampler

AB Huang 33

收 收 收

收 收 收

收 收 收 收

收 收 收

Shutter

Gel chamber

Water chamber

Water injection

(Lee et al., 2006)

Sample trimming&holding

34

Comparison of Vs measurements

• Vs from field SCPTu

• Vs from bender element

tests in gel-push triaxial

test specimens

AB Huang 35

INFERENCE OF CRR

FROM 𝑞𝑇 AND 𝑉𝑠

AB Huang 36

qT1N –CRR correlation

AB Huang 37

Slow CPT and pore pressure dissipation tests at Yuan Lin site

38

FC, %

4389

18

(Huang et al., 2009)

Comparison of qT setup

AB Huang 39

Comparison of t50

AB Huang 40

CRR-Vs1 correlation

41

SUBSIDENCE IN M/S SOILS

AB Huang 42

Field monitoring site

43

Subsidence & GWT records

AB Huang 44

Integrated PWP+ subsidence Monitoring

45

Plastic pipew/ ribs

Corrugated pipe

Optical fiber FBG extensometer

Installation in a 100m deep borehole

Friction ring

Extensometer

Piezometer

46

24 hour record of 8/28/1247

48

sv = constant, repeated PWP fluctuation

±

±

±

±

Concluding remarks

•Post-consolidation void ratio ec

•Use of e*

•Undisturbed sampling is relatively practical

•Drainage or fines content adjustment?

•Drainage verification in CPT

•Effects of repeated PWP fluctuations

•Effects of fines may be soil dependent?

•For M/S soils with FC > 50% ???

AB Huang 49

AB Huang 50

Thank you