chapter - iv marketing and branding...
TRANSCRIPT
95
CHAPTER - IV
MARKETING AND BRANDING ASPECTS OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PRODUCTS.
Introduction:
This chapter deals with the introduction of different marketing concepts
given by the national as well as international experts. It also compares the old
concept of marketing, which was product centered, with the modern concept of
Marketing which moves around the customer, this new concept is called as
customer centered concept of marketing. This chapter also highlights on the
branding concepts in alcoholic beverage. At the same time it also deals with
significance of advertising promotion and growth of surrogate advertising in
liquor industry While focusing on these points, it has also covered the concept of
consumer behavior and marketing of alcoholic beverage industry.
Marketing is a comprehensive term and it includes all resources and a set
of activities necessary to direct and facilitate the flow of goods and services from
producer to consumer in the process of distribution. It is regarded as a
management function to plan, promote and deliver products to the clients or
customers. Human efforts, finance, and management constitute the primary
resources in marketing. Basically, marketing deals with identifying and
satisfying, human and social needs. A marketeer is motivated to convert a private
or social need into a profitable business opportunity. It is the task of creating,
promoting, and delivering goods and services to consumers and business, many
people view marketing as being advertising, sales promotion (i.e. merely selling),
and in some cases, consumer research. ”Marketing is a human activity directed at
satisfying needs and wants through exchange process. The threshold of marketing
is demand generation. After the demand for a product is generated. The process
of satisfying such a demand starts through advertising and sales promotion. But
before going to task of advertising and sales promotion, the marketer has to
match the generated demand with the supply position of company. This is
because; mere generation of demand for a product is just one of the several tasks
of marketing. Failing to match the demand with the supply position of the
96
company may prove disastrous for the marketer. Prof. Philip Kotler, in the article
“The Major Tasks of Marketing Management” has listed various levels of
demand and the corresponding tasks of a marketer. For example, a hotel marketer
on a hill station may be faced with an irregular demand i.e. excessive demand
during the season. Here, his task obviously is to promote the hotel during off
season by offering off season discounts on room and food tariffs, organizing
special events to attract tourists, promoting it as a conference venue, etc.
The very purpose of business is to create a customer, and for this, the
companies have to understand his needs, want and desires in a sharp manner.
Gone are the days, when Indian customer had only Bajaj scooters, Ambassadors
and Fiats for his automotive needs. The wider choice available today cater to
gaps in his personal transportation needs and also tries to match his personality
profile. There are vehicles suitable for men and women, vehicles to shuttle in the
city and vehicles for small families. These vehicles are not only functional, but,
they are aesthetically built too. Technologically, they are aerodynamic and fuel-
efficient. The moral is to keep on changing so as to keep pace with the changing
needs of customers. The winning formula cannot be the same for all time to
come.
Following are two activities that are most significant is marketing.
1) Matching the product with demand, i.e., customer needs and desires or
target.
2) The transfer of ownership and possession at every stage in the flow of
goods from the primary producer to the ultimate consumer.
Marketing comprises all activities involved in the determination and
satisfaction of customer needs at a profit. “Marketing should be considered as a
central business function as it establishes, develops and commercializes long term
customer relationship so that objective of both the parties are met”2 By means of
marketing function, marketer can direct the firm’s response to an ever-changing
market environment and orient all parts of the business towards the creation of a
satisfied customer. Marketing encompasses all activities of exchange conducted
by producers and middlemen in commerce for the purpose of satisfying consumer
demand. “Marketing is typically y seen as the task of creating, promoting and
delivering goods and services to consumer and businessmen”3.
97
The American Marketing Association defines marketing as the process of
planning and executing the conception, pricing, promotion and distribution of
ideas, goods and services to create exchange that satisfy individual and
organizational objectives. Paul Mazur defined marketing as the creation and
delivery of a standard of living to society. This definition catches the creation and
delivery of a standard of living to society. This definition catches the real spirit of
the marketing process. It has consumer orientation. It duly honors the marketing
concept, which indicates a shift from product to customer orientation, i.e.,
fulfillment of customer needs and desires. It emphasizes the major function of
marketing, Viz., satisfaction of customer and social demand for material goods
and services. It includes product planning and development. It makes business
firm a full-fledged marketing organization. However, it is too vague, general and
broad and lacks descriptive tone in marketing.
Brand marketing and competition:
“What’s’ in a name? That which we call a rose by any other word would
smell as sweet”, said Shakespeare. What explains MacDonald’s, Starbucks,
IKEA ,P&G, Apple’s iPod, Toyota and Harley-Davidson, etc, to be among top
100 brands? Is it their sales revenue? No is it their market share? No is it their
profitability? No is it their global presence? No if all of these are not vindicative
of the companies’ entitlement to feature in the global brands’ list, what then
explains their inclusion? The answer is brands. Because these companies are able
to create, nurture, and sustain powerful brands and all the above stated inferences
are consequences of these untiring efforts.
In rapid changing business environment of today, characterized by an ever
increasing globalization, rocketing competition, and continuous market
deregulation a company’s brand can be a decisive feature that distinguishes its
product from its competitors. Now-a- days branding is considered as strategic
tool for companies to pursue increased growth and sales objectives and ensuring
their future success. The basic function of branding is to distinguish a companies
offering from its competitors, to create identification and brand awareness to
guarantee certain level of quality and satisfaction and to help with certain level of
98
promotion of the product. Brand is a crucial element of marketing, as a means of
liking item with the product line or emphasizing individuality of the product.
For a customer brand makes product identification easier, it
communicates features and benefits, it helps product evaluation, it establishes the
product position in the market, it reduces risk in purchasing, and it creates interest
and character for the product. From the retailers perspective the brand implies
benefits from brand marketing support and attracts customers. For the
manufacturers, it helps to create the consumer loyalty, defend against
competition, create differential advantage, allow for premium pricing, helps
targeting and increases the power over the retailers. ‘ when a segment of
consumer market prefers one brand to another and will accept no substitute, the
producer or the distributor of this brand controls the part of the market.
Brand knowledge
Brand knowledge refer to brand awareness (whether and when consumers
know the brand) and brand image (what association consumer have with the
brand). The different dimensions of brand knowledge can be classified in a
pyramid (adapted from Keller 2001), in which brand attachment stems from
rational and emotional brand evolutions, which derive from functional and
emotional brand associated which require brand awareness. Brand knowledge
measure are some time called “customer mind-set” measure because they capture
how the brand is perceived in the customer’s mind.
Brand awareness
Brand awareness measures the accessibility of the brand in memory.
Brand awareness can be measured through brand recall recognition. Brand recall
reflects the ability of measures to retrieve the brand from memory when given the
products category, the needs fulfilled by category, or some other type of probe as
a cue.
99
Brand recall
Measures:
• Please name all the brand of beverages/soft drinks/carbonated soft drinks
you can think of
• Please name all the brand of beverages you can think of that you would
bring to an party.
Possible Results:
• 70% of consumer think of kingfisher when asked to provide the name of a
beer (versus 30% for knock out).
• knockout is in the top three brand of party beverage for 30% of consumers
(versus 70% kingfisher)
It is important to measure not only the depth of recall (the percentage of
people who know the brand) but also the width of recall (the cues that lead to
brand recall) therefore, it is important to ponder the choice of the cue that will be
used in the recall question. A good start is to think about who, when, where and
how the brand will be bought or used).Typical cues are:
Subcategories (beverages/soft drink/colas/diet colas, etc.).
Consumption occasions/goals (beverages that you would consider
purchasing for a romantic date, etc.).
Place (available in a supermarket. In a bar, etc.)
People (drink alone, in a group, etc.)
BRAND LOYALTY
A close link exit among learning, habit and brand loyalty. Brand loyalty
represents a favorable attitude toward a brand over time. It is result of consumer
learning that one brand can satisfy their needs.
Two approaches to the study of brand loyalty have dominated the
marketing literature. The first, an instrumental conditioning approach, views
consistent purchasing of one brand over time as an indication of brand loyalty.
Consumers repeat purchasing behavior is assumed to reflect reinforcement and a
strong stimulus-to-response link. Research that takes this approach user
probabilistic models of consumer learning to estimate the probability of
100
consumer buying the same brand again, again given a number of past purchases
of that brand. The second approach to the of brand loyalty is based on cognitive
theories. Some researchers believe that behavior alone does not reflect brand
loyalty. Loyalty implies a commitment to a brand that may not be reflected by
just measuring continuous behavior. A family may buy a particular brand because
it is the lowest-priced on the, market. A slight increase in price may cause the
family to shift to another brand in the case, continuous purchasing dose not
reflect reinforcement or loyalty. The stimulus (product) and reward link are not
strong. An attitudinal measure combined with a measure is required to identify
true loyalty.
Spirits and wine industry revolves Around Power Brands
Having a diversified portfolio of brand that include power brand will
protect a company against risks in any industry, especially in the spirits and wine
industry.
In the spirits and wine sectors it is important to have a strong portfolio of
brand that includes several described as a brand that it is recognized as a leader
by consumers, as well as the sector it is a party. To compete with established
giants of an industry or to move up in the ranking, a company must be diversified
in its brand portfolio of quality brands is an integral par of being a leader in the
spirits and wine sector, and is a helpful lesson for any portfolio manager.
The five largest companies in the spirits and wine industry, by volume,
are Diageo, Pernod Ricard, fortune brands, Bacardi, and brown-Forman. These
rankings have recently been shuffled when Pernod Ricard and Fortune Brands
together acquired brands sold off by Allied Domecq, a former player in the
industry. The addition of many quality and some key brands by both these
companies have strengthened their positions as leaders in the spirits and wine
market.
Recently, a study on spirits and wine brands from around the world
ranked the 100 most powerful brands. It was the first study of its kind sheds some
light onto the major spirits and wine brands, the owners of those brands, the
general make-up of the industry as a whole, and brand portfolio management.
101
Power Brand Study
A panel of experienced drink industry experts conducted research on
nearly 10,000 brands of wine and spirits to come up with the worlds 100 most
powerful brands. This list of 100 power brands was established according to
volume sales and each brands international presence. Many smaller brands that
are limited to one market were excluded, but a few brands with low volume were
included because of their categorization as super-premium brand were mostly
famous brands of champagne.
Brand power is defined by a brands ability to generate value for its owner.
Value is classified by a series of measures described later. The research was
conducted on all current and potential users of alcoholic drinks. Hard measure
and soft measures were used for defining power of the brands and are excellent
example of drivers of brand value.
Hard measures include the share of market, brand growth, price
positioning and market scope of each individual brand. Share of market is the
volume-based measure of the market share of a brand’s particular category. There
were 12 categories including whiskey, rum, gin, vodka, cognac, other brandy,
still light wine, fortified wine, champagne, sparkling wine, light aperitif, and
flavored spirit. Brand growth is the projected growth based on ten years of
positioning is a measure of the brand’s ability to command a premium. Market
scope in which the brand has a significant presence. Brands were affected in the
market scope area based on whether they sold high volume in a few markets or
low volume in many markets. Having a high volume in fewer markets scored
more favorably than having low volume in many markets.
Soft measures include brand awareness, brand relevance, brand heritage,
and brand perception of each individual brand, Brand awareness is a combination
of prompted and spontaneous awareness among consumers. This is a measure of
how cognizant the population is of a brand, which includes not just its primary
users but the consuming public in general. Brand relevancy is the capacity of the
public to relate to the brand and whether they have a propensity to purchase the
brand. Brand heritage is a brand’s, Longevity, the length of time that it has
existed, and a measure of how it is embedded in local culture.
102
The final category, brand perception, takes into account how loyal
consumers are to the brand and how close a strong brand image is to a desire for
ownership among consumer.
The panel of experts independently ranked each selected brand out of 10
on the above measure (10 high, 0= low). The source given by the individual panel
member were aggregated and averaged to each a total source for each brand,. A
total source was achieved by multiplying a brand’s weighting volume by its
brand source within a defined range. The weighting is designed to adjust the
volumes to a comparable level. Brand source is a derivative of the eight measures
of brand strength. This result in the ranking of the world’s most powerful spirits
and wine brands.
The world’s top ten most powerful spirits and wine according to owner of
the brand in parentheses:
1. Smirnoff vodka (Diageo)
2. Bacardi rum (Bacardi Martini)
3. Johnnie Walker Wisk(e)y (Diageo)
4. Martini light aperitif (Bacardi Martini)
5. Stolichnaya vodka (SPI)
6. Hennessy cognac (LVMH)
7. Jack Daniel’s wish(e)y (brown-Forman)
8. Absolute vodka (vin & spirit)
9. Ballantine’s whisk(e)y (pernod Ricard)
10. Baileys flavored spirit (Diageo).
The owner of the most of the branch in the top 100 are pernod Ricard with
19 brand, Diageo with 14 brands, Fortune brands with 9 brands, Bacardi Martini
with 7 brands. LVMH with 6 brands and Brown-Forman with 5 brands. After the
complete acquisition of Allied Domecq by pernod Ricard the letter’s portfolio of
brand was creased to 19 and that was five more than the industry’s consensus
overall leader, Diageo. Fortune brands ranks third after its acquisition of brand
the two the Allied Domecq sale, behind the two biggest companies, with close
behind fortune Brands.
103
The study, which goes into more detailed breakdown of power brand by
sector country of origin the strongest brands without being adjusted for by each
brand’s weighted volume, and the full listing of all 100 power brand’s is an
indictor of the necessity for having a strong portfolio of brands in the spirits and
wine sector. The combination of power brands with other quality-diversified
brands is a strong asset to any company in any industry.
Industry Leaders and Power Brands
It is no coincidence that the leaders of the spirits and wine sector also are
at the top of the list of companies with the most powerful brands. Brands gain
value through the current and future accumulated brand equity stored in the
minds of its consumer. Power brands produce a more dependable stream of
revenue, profit and cash flow than non branded equivalent products or services.
The increased value allows the owner of an established brand or a power brand to
sell more or to sell at a higher price than the owner of a generic brand.
Established brands are able to command higher prices when sold because
consumers have embraced trusted brand as a primary choice criterion in an
overcrowded and competitive marketing environment. All the five main industry
leaders mentioned earlier – Diageo, pernod Ricard, Fortune, Brands-have power
brands and diversified portfolios of brands in the spirits and wine sector.
Having a diversified portfolio of brands that includes power brands will
protect a company against risks in any industry, especially in the spirits and wine
industry: power brands have been proven over time and will continue to produce
value for an owner. There may be temporary drops in sales, but barring a
catastrophe, these power brands will continue to sell at or near their established
levels. This is what makes power brands attractive and compels companies to
acquire the brands, sometimes at a premium.
A company can also protect itself by having strong brands across a variety
of categories include whisk(e)y rum gin vodka cognac, wine, champagne, and
flavored spirits. This provides separate and distinct avenues for producing
revenue within the company. Having brands in several different categories can
cover risks, which include changing trends in consumer taste or unexpected
change in market for ingredients. An example of this is the recent scare that
104
tequila prices would skyrocket because of the health concerns regarding the
agave crop increase regarding the agave crop in Mexico. If the price of
production increase dramatically causing the cost of the final product to increase,
consumer could shift to the more reasonable alternatives. This is not a perfect
example, as the higher prices will tend to cover costs for producers, but it is an
example of how market forces can affect trends in consumption, in rare cases a,
brand may be so strong that consumers would be willing to accept the rise in
prices.
A good strategy employed by leaders in the industry is to have several
power brands spread across different categories. The top four this regime.
Diageo’s top four power brands are Smirnoff in the vodka category, johnnie
walker in whisk(e)y, Baileys in flavored spirits and caption Morgan in rum.
Perond Ricard ‘s top five power brands are Ballantine’s and Chivas Reagal in
whisk(e)y, Ricard’s in flavored spirits, Maretell in cognac and Beefeater in the
gin category. The third ranked company forune brands has jim beam and
Canadian club in the whisk(e)y category and sauza tequila, finally, Bacardi in
Martini in light aperitif, Dewar’s in whisk(e)y category and sauza tequila.
Finally, Bacardi Martine has Bacardi in the rum category, martini I nn light
aperitif, dewar,s in whisky (e)y, grey goose in vodka and Bombay in gin
categories . these companies also prefer to hive power brands in as many
categories possible to take full advantage of the entire spectrum of spirits and
wine consumers throughout the world. By spreading out the brands and
categories of spirits and wines offered, a company increases its access to the full
base of its consumers on a global basis. Also, being able to sell a variety of
products throughout the globe can lead to additional opportunities for other
brands within a company. A company that does well in a market with one brand
may try and introduce another of its brand trough cross-promotion; which may
lead to increased the newly introduced brand.
105
Table 4.1
Top 10 International Brands of Alcoholic Beverages.
Sr.No Brand Owner Category
1 Smirnoff Diageo Vodka
2 Bacardi Bacardi Rum
3 Johnnie Walker Diageo
Whisky-
Scotch
4 Absolut Pernord Ricard Vodka
5 Jack Daniels Brown Forman Whiskey
6 Pitu EnagarraIamento Pitu Cachaca
7 Nemiroff
Nemiroff Ukrainiam
vodka Vodka
8 Captain Morgan Diageo Rum
9 Balleys Diageo Liqnevrs
10 Velho Barreiro Tatuszinho Cacahca
Source: - Euro monitor (2009-10)
Table No 4.1 shows the Top 10 International Brands of Alcoholic
Beverages. It can be seen that Smiranoff is the No 1 Brand followed by Bacardi,
Jonnie Walker and so on . Diageo has the largest market share and top four
brands under its brand portfolio followed by Pernord Ricard.
Table 4.2
Brand preference of Beer
Sr.No. Brand (Strong) Brand(mild)
1 Kingfisher Kingfisher(mild)
2 Haywards Foster
3 Knock out Budweiser
4 Kalyani black lable Royal challenge
5 Canon Others
Source: - Primary Data (2009-10)
106
Table No 4.2 shows the consumer Brand preference towards Beer in mild
and strong category. In strong category majority of the consumers prefer
Kinngfisher, followed by Haywards, Knock out and kalyani Black label. In Mild
category consumer mostly prefer kingfisher(mild) followed by Foster, Budweiser
and Royal challenge.
Table 4.3
Brand preference of Indian made foreign Liquor (IMFL) – whisky
Sr. No. Brands(Regular) Brands(Premium)
1 Bagpiper Signature
2 McDowell No.1 Royal challenge
3 Green label Blenders spride
4 DSP Antiquity Blue
5 8PM Others
6 Others
Source:- Primary Data (2009-10)
Table No 4.3 shows the consumer Brand preference towards
IMFL(Whisky) in regular and premium brands. In Regular brands majority of the
consumers prefer Bagpiper followed by McDowell No.1,Green label, DSP,8PM
and others. In Premium category consumer mostly prefer Signature, Royal
challenge, Blenders Spride , Antiquity Blue and others.
Table 4.4
Brand preference of Indian made foreign liquor (rum and vodka)
Sr.No. Brand(Rum) Brand(Vodka)
1 McDowell No.1 Smirnoff
2 Old monk White mischief
3 Contessa Magic moment
4 Bacardi Fuel
5 Others Romanov
6 Others
Source: - Primary Data (2009-10)
107
Table No 4.4 shows the consumer Brand preference towards IMFL(RUM
& VODKA) in Rum majority of the consumers prefer McDowell No.1 followed
by Old monk, Contessa, Bacardi and Others. As far as Vodka is concerned
consumers mostly prefer Smirnoff , White mischief, Magic moment, Fuel
,Romanov and Others.
Table 4.5
Brand preference of IMFL – GIN & Brandy
Sr.No. Brand(Gin) Brand(Brandy)
1 Aristocrat Honey Bee
2 Blue Riband John ex Shaw
3 Carew Old admiral
4 Others Golconda
5 Others
Source: - Primary Data (2009-10)
Table No 4.5 shows the consumer Brand preference towards IMFL(GIN
& BRANDY) in GIN majority of the consumers prefer Aristocrat followed by
Blue Riband, Carew and Others. As far as BRANDY is considered consumer
mostly Preferred Honey Bee followed by John ex Shaw, Old admiral, Golconda
and Others.
Table 4.6 Brand preference of Wine
Sr. No. Brands
1 Sula
2 Indage
3 Ambrosia
4 N.D. Wines
5 Others
Source: - Primary Data (2009-10)
108
Table 4.6 shows the Brand preference of wine, majority of the consumers
prefer sula wines followed by the Brands of indage, Ambrosia, N.D wines and
others .
Future of the spirits and wine sector
The future of the sprits and wine sector is wide open. As people continue
to choose their favorite brands, the market will continue to follow suit with the
industry giants acquiring the new and emerging brands to add to their stacked
portfolios of brands. The leaders of the pack such as Diageo, pernod Ricard,
fortune brands, and Bacardi martini will acquire more brands and provide them to
the public, in a effort to increase revenues. It is also a way to prevent competitors
from strengthening their position in any certain category or market.
The current trend has seen the sale of allied domecq to Pernod Ricard and
fortune brands, apart from the sales of grey goose vodka and bushmills
whisky(e)y. today’s global economy is geared toward having several
international conglomerates dominate a business sector and acquire aspiring
competitors before they grow large enough to compete. This may continue in the
sprite and wine sector, as more brands become established and show increase in
value that will attract the established giants.
The big companies in this sector are all set to add brands and diversify
their portfolio of brands increase sales and expand into as many markets as
possible. It is a race among the elite to get to the top and stay at the top. As of
now it appears to be a fight among Pernod Ricard, fortune brands, Bacardi, and
brown-Forman to catch up to Diageo. Pernod Ricard seems to be the company
gaining ground at the moment.
Having a diversified portfolio of brands will enable a company to follow
trends and adapt more smoothly to the changes in sales patterns.
Alcohol Advertising and Promotion
Advertisements have a strong influence in our life. We like them because
they provide information and create awareness about the market. Their
significance in corporate world can not be underestimated. But many times, some
advertisements are accused of misleading people. When such accusations are
109
provide, some advertisements are scrapped off from media. Such instances have
been reported in the advertisements endorsing alcoholic drinks and cigarettes.
Expenditure incurred on Media
Pitch with Madison Media on ‘Ad spend estimates’ show that the
advertising industry in India grew by 21.7% in 2006 to touch a healthy figure of
Rs.14,505 crore against Rs.11,915 crore in 2005. If the breakup among different
media is considered as shown in table No.4.7. These figures show that Industry
believes in Influencing individuals through advertising.
Table no 4.7
Expenditure incurred on Media.
Sr.
No. Medium
2005
(Rs. In crore)
2006
(Rs. In crore)
% Growth
in 2006
1 TV 5003 6000 19.9
2 Print 5700 7000 22.8
3 Radio 200 285 42.5
4 cinema 32 55 70.8
5 Outdoor 870 1000 14.9
6 Internet 110 165 50
7 TOTAL 11915 14505 21.7
Source: Pitch 2007
It can be seen from the above table No 4.7 the Expenditure incurred on
Media, in 2005 the spending on print media was almost 5000 crore and in the
year 2006 it increased upto 7000 crore.so the maximum spending for alcoholic
beverages is done through print media, followed by TV.
Influence of Advertising
Advertisements tell us stories effectively stuffed in a few seconds. But
two famous quotes confuse the ideology behind advertising. Thomas Jefferson,
the founding father said, "Advertisements contain the only truth to be relied on in
110
a newspaper" and famous British author, H.G. Wells said, "Advertising is
legalized lying."
On the positive side, for the corporate plane, advertising enhances market
performance by providing useful information to consumers and by enabling firms
to promote the attributes of their products and services and, thereby, to compete
better with each other. Advertisements providing truthful information about the
price of a product and its attributes reduce the time and effort that consumers
need to expend searching for the products that best satisfy their needs.
Advertising can also provide for greater rivalry among firms because the greater
flow of information brings more firms into competition with each other. Finally,
the ability to advertise new products and services encourages innovative activity
by firms by providing firms with an effective way of informing consumers about
the availability of new products, or new applications of existing products. On the
customers’ front, advertising plays a dominant role in personality creation which
is evident in the consumer behavior theories which talk about customer emulating
brand personalities. The psychographic variables like emotions associated with
the brand image constitute the personality of a brand. The experience of the
consumers with such brand cultivates personality. This logically flows from the
fact that personalities are particularly useful for the creation of brand
associations. Brand associations influence the evaluation of alternatives. In this
stage, and for these goals, advertising is considered to be most effective
communication tool (Brassington & Pettit 2000). Perhaps, the most visible and
best known way of personality creation is by the means of celebrity endorsers,
public heroes, sports people, pop stars and movie stars are hired to lend their
personality to a brand (Erdogan & Baker 2000). Many of the theories about the
influence of advertising communications which would affect the customers mind
if compared collectively, all result in action which in other words is the
‘Purchase’.
111
Table No 4.8
Stages of Impact and Different Models.
Sr.
No.
Stages
Of Impact &
Models
Aida
Model
Hierarchy
Of Effects
Innovation
Adoption
Model
Communications
Model
1 Cognitive
Stage Attention
Awareness
Knowledge Awareness
Exposure
Reception
Cognitive
Response
2 Affective
Stage
Interest
Desire
Liking
Preference
Conviction
Interest
Evaluation
Attitude
Intention
3 Behavior
Stage Action Purchase
Trial
Adoption Behavior
It can be seen from the table No 4.8 the comparative picture of models
which depict the influence of advertising on the individual at different Stages.
Three different stages are shown namely cognitive stage, affective stage and
behavior stage. And all the processing of thoughts is done in the individual’s
Black box.
To appreciate couple of changing trends, the New York Times published
a detailed article “Consumers, Long the Targets, Become the Shapers of
Campaigns” by Louise that quoted number of examples on advertising campaigns
and effect created by them in terms of customer spending. The transition from
‘one way communication’ which is a traditional way of advertising to ‘Interactive
advertising campaigns’ is proving to be effective in the current order. A study at
the Yale Center for Customer Insights found that people who are told that a
product is popular will buy it over a competing product. Mr. Dhar, Director of
Yale School of Management, Professor of Marketing said ‘interactive marketing
helps companies identify the consumers who care about their products and are
most likely to buy them. Making that connection has been a challenge for
companies that manufacture products and sell them through retailers rather than
directly to consumers’.
112
Mr. Parag, a member of ‘Consumer International’ talks about the shifting
target of the advertising industry. Through the 1960s and 1970s it was the house-
wife but this gave way to youth being the target of the ads. The focus then shifted
to children, which continues even today. He says that, today children can be seen
in ads which are not child-products. He cites the Maruti Esteem ad in which two
children compare whose daddy has the bigger car. "In fact, today 84% of parents
take their children along when buying products which are not child-products
simply because children have a big say in buying decisions,”
The producers of alcohol beverage brands (e.g., Heineken or Guinness
beer, Jack Daniel’s Whiskey or Smirnoff vodka, Penfold wine or Mumma
Champagne) use advertising and promotional activities in a way that is no
different from any other branded good manufacturer. They compete for market
share in an exceptionally competitive environment. Competition is not only
between brands but also between categories, so that Heineken lager competes not
only against Fosters or Budweiser, but also against Ballantine’s scotch or Bacardi
run- or Penfold shiraz or a Mondavi merlot.
The competition for a bigger share of the market is strong and incessant,
with advertising being a part- important but still only a part- of the wider
marketing process. In most established, mature markets (where branded products
are well known), total consumption is fairly static. Companies attempt to increase
their business through better bran marketing, enabling them to gain market share
at the expense of the competition by trying to give their brands greater appeal
than other branded competitors. In emerging markets, where the situation is less
static, companies, still mainly compete against each other for market share. There
is little commercial advantage to be gained from generic advertising of beverage
alcohol.
Individual company strategies involve increasing the share of an existing
market for their products. In the USA, beer cons consumption declined 7.5%
from 1990 to 1999. Even within that shrinking market there was intense
competition, and the import sector- foreign beers like Beck’s, Guinness,
Carlsberg and Corona-Managed to increase their share of the total market
significantly from 4.5% to 9.1%.
113
Surrogate Advertisements Promoted By Liquor Industry :
The liquor industry is a prominent player in this game. Few surrogate
advertisements shown in print, electronic and outdoor media are – Bagpiper sod
and cassettes & CDs, Haywards soda, Derby special soda, Gilbey green aqua,
Royal challenge golf accessories and mineral water, kingfisher mineral water,
white Mischief holidays, Smirnoff cassettes & CDs, Imperial Blue cassettes &
Cds, Teacher’s achievement awards etc. These products bear exactly the same
brand name and logo, which we had seen earlier in liquor advertisements. It was
little surprising to know that liquor giants like McDowell’s and Seagram’s have
entered into new segments like cassettes & CDs, mineral water, sports
accessories etc. Later it was found that the basic aim of these surrogate
advertisements was to promote their liquor brands like beer, wine, vodka etc.
This brand extension is an act of bypassing the advertisement ban.
A similar trend is followed by companies making Cigarettes, Paan Masala
and Gutkha. Few examples of surrogate advertisements in this category are – Red
& white bravery awards, wills lifestyle, Four Square white water rafting,
Manikchand awards etc. Billboard advertising of international and domestic
brands of alcohol through surrogate means is widely being employed by alcohol
industry worldwide. Sponsorship of sports and cultural events is widely being
undertaken by alcohol companies in India. “Royal stag” sponsors Indian cricket
matches and cricket players. “Shaw Wallace” sponsored the Indian open golfing
event as the Royal Challenge Indian open and the Kenya cricket team. “Seagram”
sponsors events such as “Chivas Regal Polo championships” and “Chivas Regal
Invitational golf challenge” for corporates.
Indirect Advertising
Teacher’s whiskey has launched the Teacher’s Achievement Awards.
Other sponsored awards and events include: “Smirnoff international fashion
award”. “ Lakme India Fashion Week” was Sponsored by Seagram’s Blenders
pride Sponsored by Seagram’s Blenders pride.
Though a ban has been imposed on advertisements endorsing tobacco
product, this industry has resorted to surrogate advertising a few years ago. The
Health Ministry has recently implemented the tobacco control legislation which
114
will imply a complete ban on advertisements and all direct & direct and indirect
promotional campaigns for tobacco products. In 2001, Indian Tobacco Company
(ITC) had voluntary withdrawn the wills sports sponsorship of the Indian cricket
team when the government had first proposed a ban on advertising through
legislation.
The Corporate Standpoint
The industry segment has its own standpoint in defense. The liquor lobby
claims that everything is in accordance to the government regulations. “If a brand
has equity, why shouldn’t it be allowed to advertise? Also, brand extension is an
industry practice adopted by different product categories”, comments Alok Gupta
of UB group. “When we advertise our products, we follow all the guidelines”,
declares president, sales and marketing, Radico Khaitan. They clarify that they
have stopped showing liquor advertisements and they are free to use the brand
name for any other products. Even the confederation of Indian Alcoholic
Beverages Companies (CIABC) advertising code maintains that advertisements
of products (Real brand extensions) by the liquor industry must be allowed.
From a layman’s point of view, their claims seem to be justified. But this
is a clear example of taking advantage of the loopholes. There is a pint to ponder.
When they have stopped showing liquor advertisements, why the same brand
name and logo is used to promote products like cassettes and CDs or mineral
water? They could have assigned different brand names. It seems they have a
hidden agenda of highlighting the liquor or tobacco brand.
A similar over the issue of surrogate advertisements in politics was raised
in April 2004 on the eve of Lok Sabha elections. Complaints of slanderous and
offensive advertisements were raised by two major political parties – BJP and
Congress against each other. The issue became so serious that the Supreme Court
had to interfere in this affair. Finally on 13 April 2004, the Court gave a verdict
to curb smear advertisements on electronic media. By appointing Election
commission as referee, the court has tried to put an end to surrogate advertising in
politics.
According to the Cable Act under the ministry of information and
broadcasting, - “no broadcaster is permitted to show an advertisement which
115
promotes directly or indirectly, sale or consumption of cigarettes, tobacco
products, wine, alcohol, liquor or other intoxicants… ” Now a new clause has
been added under the act stating that, “any advertisement for a product that uses a
brand name which his also used for cigarette, tobacco product, wine, alcohol,
liquor or any other intoxicant will not be permitted”. Finally, in April 2005, the
ministry resorted to a ban on surrogate advertisements of liquor and tobacco
products on television.
After this directive, the surrogate advertisements are seldom shown on
television. Now the companies will have to reframe their policies. But who will
take care of print and outdoor media is not certain.
According to ASCI (Advertising Standards Council of India), surrogate
advertisements are harmful. Now it will be up to the ASCI to take up the matter
with the respective companies.
116
117
Table No 4.9
COMPARATIVE PICTURE OF ADVERTISING REGULATIONS IN
SELECTED COUNTRIES
Sr.
No.
Points of Emphasis in the
Regulatory codes
INDIA USA CANADA NEW
ZEALAND
1 Emphasis on adult target
group
Major 18 yrs Yes Yes
2 Emphasis on not touching
children related programs
Yes Yes Yes Yes
3 Rule on not Influencing non
drinkers
Yes Yes Yes No
4 Annual check of the age of
Target group
NA Yes No No
5 Emphasis on not advertising
near colleges
NA Yes No No
6 Ban on usage popular brand
ambassadors, models and
characters close to children's
heart
Yes Models & actors
should be over 25 years
No Models
should not be
young
7 Should not be messaging that
drinking is 'rite to adulthood'
NA Yes No No
8 Ban on ads with misleading
decription
Yes Practical
statements
No Yes
9 Portraying religion, cast,
color, Nationality
Yes Religious
themes
should be
avoided
No Yes
10 Sexually oriented messages Implicit Yes Expression of
any feeling
due to
alcohol
Yes
118
11 Should drinking in reasonable
manner
NA Yes Yes Yes
12 sTherapeutic Claim NA Yes No No
13 Communicating that it is the
secret behind success or
answer to problems
NA Yes Yes Yes
14 Should not be associated with
masculine or unruly behavior
NA Yes No Yes
15 Ban on Urge to use NA No Yes No
16 Ban on communicating
product strength, package
NA Factual Yes Yes
17 Ban on communicating that
product makes the person
involved in any immediate
activity
NA Yes That it is
essential
for any
activity
Yes
18 Ban in scenes of consuming
alcohol
NA No Yes No
Table No 4.9 shows the comparative analysis of advertising regulations in
India, USA, Canada and New Zealand. The comparative analysis is made on the
basic of various regulatory codes. Almost all the four countries are following
some of the common regulatory codes, like Emphasis on adult target group,
Emphasis on not touching children related programs etc.
CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR AND MARKETING
Consumer behavior is a broad field of study that investigates the exchange
process through individuals and groups acquire, consume and dispose of goods,
services, ideas and experiences. The principles of consumer behavior are useful
to business managers, government regulators and non-profit organizations as well
as to ordinary people. For marketing manager’s knowledge of consumers
behavior has important implications for environmental analysis, product
positioning, the segmentation of market place, the design of market research and
the development of the marketing mix. Consumer behavior is defined as “the
119
study of buying units and the exchange processes inward in acquiring, consuming
and disposing of goods, services, experiences and ideas.
The above sample definition consists of different purview of the whole
consumer behavior.
A consumer is inevitably at the one end of the exchange process in which
resources are transferred between two parties. It also suggested that the exchange
process involves a series of steps beginning with the beginning with the
acquisition phase, moving on the consumption phase and ending with the
acquisition of the product or service. In acquisition phase researchers analyses the
factors that influence the consumers product and several choices. In consumption
phase researchers analyses how consumers actually use the product or service and
the experience they obtain from such use. The final phase i.e. deposition phase
refers to what consumers do with a product once they have finished using it.
Consumer Behavior is an applied discipline. Though it borrows theories
and knowledge from other fields such as Anthropology, Sociology, Demography,
Economics and Psychology. Hence it is a discipline in its own right. Consumers,
Researchers are developing their own body of knowledge to supplement
knowledge they have obtained from other fields. Central to the field of the
consumer behavior is the study of the exchange process. Exchange is the process
through which some tangible or intangible, actual or symbolic, product is
transferred between two or more social factors. When exchange takes place,
resources are transferred between the parties. These resources include goods,
services, money, status, information and feelings. Finally exchange may be
restricted or complex, internal or external, formal or informal and relational or
discrete.
Research in Consumer Behavior is organized according to three
perspectives that act as a guide thinking about the identifying the factors that
influence the consumer acquisition behavior. These three perspectives are as
follows.
1. Decision making perspective
2. Experimental perspective
3. Behavioral influence perspective.
120
Decision making perspective portrays consumer as taking a series of
steps when making a purchase. These steps include problem recognition, search,
alternative evaluation, choice and post acquisition evaluation.
Experimental perspective on consumer buying proposes that in some
instances, customers do not make purchase according to a strictly rational
decision making process. Instead, they buy certain products and services in order
to have fun, create fantasies or feel desired emotions. These are the purchases
made on certain impulse and purchase made to seek certain varieties.
Behavioral influence perspective assumes that strong environmental
forces propel consumer to make purchase without necessarily first developing
strong feeling or belief about the product. According to these perspectives,
consumer neither goes through a rational decision making process nor relies on
the feeling to purchase a product or service. Instead, consumers purchase action
directly results from the environmental forces such as sales promotion device,
cultural norms, the physical environment and the economic pressures.
Diversity in Market Place
We as consumers differ in age, gender, education, occupation, marital
status, activities & interests, preferences, opinions, foods they eat and products
we buy. There is diversity among marketers; not only among producers but also
sellers. Traditional retailers, mass merchandisers, discount stores, and off-price
stores. But there has been a shift from mass marketing to niche marketing to
direct marketing, from custom catalogs to television shopping to cyber shopping.
There is a great diversity in advertising media. In addition to the traditional
broadcast and print media, we have ethnic media within a great variety of
alternative media. Recognizing the high degree of diversity among us, consumer
research seeks to identify the constants that exist among the people of the world.
121
Table No 4.10
Changes in consumer Behaviour
Sr.
No
1980s 1990s 2003
1 Conspicuous consumer Frugal consumer,
becoming more well-
off
Suspicious but generally
well-of consumer
2 Image-Driven Value-and quality-
driven
Highly eclectic
3 Trusting Skeptical and cynical A “prove it” attitude
4 Brand Loyal Does not exhibit
loyalty
Believe that there is
always something better
5 Emotional buyer Informed buyer Highly informed and
specialized buyer
6 Dreamers Escapists Focused on personal
needs
7 Overindulgent Health-and wellness-
conscious
Health , wellness, and
some overindulgence,
without expectation of
costs or consequences
8 Overworked Burned out, stressed
out, and placing
tremendous value on
convenience and
time
Reliant on technology
and telecommunications
to save time in making
purchasing decisions
9 Industrious baby
boomers
Responsible baby
boomer
Unconvinced generation
next.
Source: Adopted from Principles of Marketing, Kotler, Adam, Brown and
Armstrong.
Table No 4.10 shows us how consumers have changed over three decades.
In fact, you can see in your own family, if you take your parents as buyers and
yourself as a buyer and then see the difference in your behavior.
122
Consumer Behavior and Purchase Process Analysis Alcohol beverage
Industry:
The following are Research findings regarding the purchase process
analysis in the Alcohol consumption -
1) Problem Recognition:
• First-time use is triggered by external stimuli such a peer group, first-time
consumption is influenced by others almost 100% of the time.
• Significantly, first-time use does not have a high correlation with brand
loyalty.
• Habitual users consumption need recognition may be divided into the
following categories –
� With established consumption patterns consumption is ranked as a
majority who drink everyday, those who drink after alternate day.
� With established consumption occasions daily drinkers did not exhibit
specific occasion consumption. Less frequent drinkers ranked
occasions as follows – with friends, when alone, when stressed and
lastly to improve concentration.
� Significant variation was found in the sample based on consumer
gender wherein frequency of consumption with females was
substantially lower and occasions were largely with friends.
2) Information Search / Generation of Alternatives:
• Rarely an active search – brand familiarity and loyalty among drinkers is
significant.
• Alternative seeking is minimal and varies inversely with rate of
consumption.
(I.e. frequent drinkers do not exhibit variety seeking buying behavior)
3) Evaluation of Alternative:
• Not structured evaluation, vaguely-defined criteria.
• Parameters for evaluation declared as follows (in descending order of
rank) – taste, brand, association with self-image, availability, size
hardness, and health.
123
• Parameters were more in the consumer’s mind than obviously conscious
decisions and varied with psychographics instead of demographics
(common demographic segment exhibited varied evaluation criteria).
4) Purchase Decision and Implementation:
• Limited problem Solving Behavior
• Huge degree or brand loyalty
• Time and non-availability are not significant constraining factors for
brand decision or long-term consumption. However, short-term
consumption may be dependent on availability.
• Transforming a purchase intention into a purchase decision is influenced
by a variety of factors. In the long term decision to purchase is based on
the decision to following criteria (in descending order of rank) – Personal
health, family pressure, family health, religious, reasons, guilt. Brand
decision is based on image (further dependent on peer image and
association with self-image). It should be noted however; that these ranks
were given by consumer’s themselves and guilt is liable to play a larger
part among the younger target audience (i.e. first-time drinkers) than
admitted.
• Unanticipated situational Factors (e.g. Reactions of salespersons) are rare
in occurrence and do not have significant impact on the purchase
decision.
6) Post-purchase Behavior:
Satisfaction or dissatisfaction is not dependent on many factors and
remains roughly similar for each consumer across purchase periods. Post-
purchase evaluation is very significant for first-time users (first time use is
defined as consumption not purchase as it is not usually linked with direct
purchase by the final user). This phenomenon decreases as use become more
prevalent, though no specific dividing timeline or use could be identified where
such evaluation loses significance.
Thus, alcoholic consumers exhibit typical ‘habitual buying behavior’.
Once loyalty is established, they change brand infrequently, and tend to remain
124
loyal to a brand for extended periods of time, which change only due to extrinsic
factors like change in peer groups, discontinuation of brand (as in the case of
Wills Lights) etc. Habitual buying results in automatic ‘reach for the brand’
behavior, thus minimizing the sales push opportunity and maximizing the need
for advertising and positioning in the consumer’s mind. There is a high-degree of
brand familiarity as opposed to brand conviction and consumers find it hard to
defend their purchase decision. Post-purchase evaluation is not a frequent
occurrence though must be considered by the marketer, as given the frequency of
consumption, a single bad experience could put a loyal consumer off the brand
for life.
Concluding Remarks:
Since alcohol advertising is expensive, it is therefore specifically and
selectively targeted at consumers thought likely to buy a given products. Market
research is constantly refining the target audience and tightening strategies for
reaching it. Thus, a marketing campaign indiscriminately aimed at the general
public is inefficient and not cost effective. Equally, group who are not already
consumers, such as abstainers or young people below the legal purchase age, are
not a fertile target for advertising resources. Resources are directed at those
already consuming a certain type of product in an effort to persuade them to
switch brands.
The sprits wine sector is a finicky industry because of its cyclical nature
and the recent phenomenon of lifestyle branding. Therefore, it is a good example
of how important portfolio management is for companies. As consumer tastes
change and trend evolve, a diversified portfolio of brands will help companies
manage their economy effectively.
The importance of portfolio diversification and having power brands is
very evident in the sprits and wine sector, but the idea of portfolio diversification
and its benefits translate into any industry or business. The protection provided
by diversification is essential in today’s market when trends change quickly and
consumers’ wants and needs follow those changes. Having a diversified portfolio
of brands will enable a company to follow trends and adapt more smoothly to the
changes in sales patterns.
125
REFERENCES
1. Adams, W., Garry, P., Rhyne, R., Hunt, W., Goodwin, J. (1990). Alcohol
intake in the healthy elderly: Changes with age in a cross-sectional and
longitudinal study. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 38: 211-
216.
2. Adlaf, E.M. and Kohn, P.M. (1989). Alcohol Advertising, Consumption
and abuse: a covariance-structure modeling look at Strickland’s data.
British Jounal of Addiction, 84(7): 749-757.
3. Advertising Standards Authority (2000). Annual report 2000. Auckland,
New Zealand, (www.asa.c.nz/2000/AR.htm). Advertising Standard
Authority, Inc.
4. Calfee, J. and Scherage, C. (1994) The influence of advertising on alcohol
consumption : A literature review and an econometric analysis of four
European nations. International Journal of Advertising, 13(4): 287-310.
5. Duffy, M. (1991). Advertising and the consumption of tobacco and
alcoholic drink: a system-wide analysis. Scottish Journal of Political
Economy, 38(4): 369-385.
6. Duffy, M. (1991). Advertising in demand systems for alcoholic drink and
tobacco: A comparative study Journal of Policy Modeling, 17(6) 557-577.
7. European commission (2001). Council Recommendation on the drinking
of alcohol of alcohol by children and adolescents. 2001/458/EC.
http://europa.eu.int, March 2002.
8. Evans, J.M. and Kelly, R.F. (1999). Self regulation in the Alcohol
Industry: A Review of Industry Efforts to Avoid Promoting Alcohol to
Underage consumers. A Repot to Congress from the Federal Trade
commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
9. Fillmore, K. (1988). Alcohol use across the life course: A critical review
of seventy years of international longitudinal research. Toronto, Canada :
Addiction Research Foundation.
10. Fillmore, K., Hartka, E., Jonstone, B., Leino, E., Motoyoshi, M.,
Tempple, M. (1991) A meta-analysis of life course variation in drinking:
126
the Collaborative Alcohol-Related Longitudinal Project. British Journal
of Addiction, 86: 1221-1268.
11. Fisher, J.C. (1993). Advertising Alcohol Consumption, and Abuse : A
Worldwide Survey. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
12. Fisher, J.C. (1999). Media influence. In: R.T. Ammerman, P.J. ott, and
R.E. Tarter, Eds. Prevention and societal Impact of Drug and Alcohol
Abuse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Fisher, J.C. and Cook, P.A. (1995). Advertising, alcohol Consumption,
and Mortality: An Empirical Investigation. Westport, CT : Greenwood
Press.
14. Gius, M.P. (1996). Using panel data to determine the effect of advertising
on brand-level distilled spirits sales. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57(1)
3-76.
15. Henry, H. (1996) Does Advertising affect total market size? Admap,
January, 16-19.
16. Heath, D.B. (2000). Drinking Occasions : Comparative Perspectives on
Alcohol and Culture. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
17. Hibbell, B., Andersson, B., Ahlstrom, S., Balakireva, O., Bjaranasso, T.,
Kokkevi, A., Morga, M., Eds, (2000). The 1999 ESPAD Report-The
European School Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs : Alcohol
and Other Drug Use Among Students in 30 European Countries.
Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other
Drugs (CAN), Co-operation Group to Combat Drug Abuse an Illicit
Trafficking in Drugs (The Pompidou Group).
18. Houghton, E. And Roche, A.M., Eds. (2001). Learning About Drinking.
Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
19. ICAP (1998). ICAP Reports 4. Drinking Age Limits. Washington, DC:
International Center for Alcohol Policies.
20. INRA (2001). Study on the Impact of Advertising and Teleshopping on
Minors. Study conducted for the European Commission DGEAC
(99/S139-102855).
21. " Tobacco ads likely to be stubbed out by Jan-end", Hindustan
Times,22January 2004.