chapter 8. process and measurement system capability analysis

41
Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Upload: arion

Post on 13-Jan-2016

137 views

Category:

Documents


15 download

DESCRIPTION

Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis. Natural tolerance limits are defined as follows:. Process Capability. Uses of process capability. Process may have good potential capability. Reasons for Poor Process Capability. Data collection steps:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Page 2: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process Capability

Natural tolerance limits are defined as follows:

Page 3: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Uses of process capability

Page 4: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process may have good potential capability

Reasons for Poor Process Capability

Page 5: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Data collection steps:

Page 6: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Example 7-1, Glass Container Data

Page 7: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 8: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Probability Plotting

Mean and standard

deviation could be estimated from

the plot

• The distribution may not be normal; other types of probability plots can be useful in determining the appropriate distribution.

Page 9: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process Capability Ratios

Example 5-1:

2

USL = 1.00 microns, LSL = 2.00 microns

ˆ 0.1398R

d

Page 10: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Practical interpretation

PCR = proportion of tolerance interval used by process

For the hard bake process:

Page 11: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

One-Sided PCR

Page 12: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 13: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• Cp does not take process centering into account

• It is a measure of potential capability, not actual capability

Page 14: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Measure of Actual Capability

Cpk: one-sided PCR for specification limit nearest to process average

Page 15: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Normality and Process Capability Ratios

• The assumption of normality is critical to the interpretation of these ratios.

• For non-normal data, options are:1. Transform non-normal data to normal.2. Extend the usual definitions of PCRs to handle non-normal

data.3. Modify the definitions of PCRs for general families of

distributions.

• Confidence intervals are an important way to express the information in a PCR

Page 16: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Confidence interval is wide because the sample size is small

Page 17: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Confidence interval is wide because the sample size is small

Page 18: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Use only when the process is not in control.

Process Performance Index:

2

If the process is normally distributed and in control:

ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ and because p p pk pk

RP C P C

d

Page 19: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• Specifications are not needed to estimate parameters.

Process Capability Analysis Using Control Chart

Page 20: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Since LSL = 200

Page 21: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process Capability Analysis Using Designed Experiments

Page 22: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Gauge and Measurement System Capability

Simple model:

y: total observed measurementx: true value of measurementε: measurement error

2 2Gauge and are independent. , and 0, Px x N N

Page 23: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 24: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 25: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

k = 5.15 → number of standard deviation between 95% tolerance intervalContaining 99% of normal population.k = 6 → number of standard deviations between natural tolerance limit of normal population.

For Example 7-7, USL = 60 and LSL = 5. With k =6

P/T ≤ 0.1 is taken as appropriate.

Page 26: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Estimating Variances

22GaugeˆBecause we estimate 0.887 0.79 :

Page 27: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

The gauge (with estimated SNR < 5) is not capable according to SNR criterion.

Signal to Noise Ration (SNR)

SNR: number of distinct levels that can be reliably obtained from measurements. SNR should be ≥ 5

ˆ ˆFor Example 7-7: 0.0786 and 1 0.9214.M P M

Page 28: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Discrimination Ratio

DR > 4 for capable gauges. For example, 7-7:

The gauge is capable according to DR criterion.

Page 29: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 30: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Gauge R&R Studies

• Usually conducted with a factorial experiment (p: number of randomly selected parts, o: number of randomly selected operators, n: number of times each operator measures each part)

2

2

2

2

0, : effects of parts

0, : effects of operators

0, : joint effects of parts and operators

0, : effects of operators

i P

j O

POij

ijk

P N

O N

PO N

N

Page 31: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• This is a two-factor factorial experiment.

• ANOVA methods are used to conduct the R&R analysis.

Page 32: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 33: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 34: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• Negative estimates of a variance component would lead to filling a reduced model, such as, for example:

Page 35: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

σ2: repeatability variance component

→For the example:

With LSL = 18 and USL = 58:

This gauge is not capable since P/T > 0.1.

Page 36: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

21 2

1 1 2 2

2 2

1 1

For , , , , assume , and independent from each other.

Let ... .

Then ,

n i i i

n n

n n

i i i ii i

x x x x N

y a x a x a x

y N a a

Linear Combinations

Page 37: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 38: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Nonlinear Combinations

1 2: nonlinear function of , , ,

: nominal (i.e., average) dimension for (for 1,2,... )

Taylor series expansion of :

n

i i

g x x x

x i n

g

R is higher order (2 or higher) remainder of the expansion.R → 0

Page 39: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 40: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Assume I and R are centered at the nominal values.α = 0.0027: fraction of values falling outside the natural tolerance limits.Specification limits are equal to natural tolerance limits.

2

/ 2 0.00135

Assume 25 1 Amp or 24 26 and I 25, .

3.0

26 253.0 0.33

I

II

I I N

Z Z

2Assume 4 0.06 ohms or 3.94 4.06 and I 4, .

4.06 4.003.0 0.02

R

RR

R I N

Assuming V is approximately normal:

Page 41: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

For normal distribution with unknown mean and variance:

• Difference between tolerance limits and confidence limits

• Nonparametric tolerance limits can also be calculated.

Estimating Natural Tolerance Limits