chap14.stab policy

17
Chapter Fourteen 1 ® CHAPTER 14 Stabilization Policy A PowerPoint Tutorial To Accompany MACROECONOMICS, 6th. ed. N. Gregory Mankiw By Mannig J. Simidian

Upload: chajar-matari-fath-mala

Post on 10-Dec-2015

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

kj

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

1

®

CHAPTER 14Stabilization Policy

A PowerPointTutorialTo Accompany

MACROECONOMICS, 6th. ed.N. Gregory Mankiw

By

Mannig J. Simidian

Page 2: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

2

To many economists, the case for active government policy is clearand simple. Recessions are periods of high unemployment, lowincomes, and increased economic hardship. The model of aggregatedemand and aggregate supply shows how shocks to the economy cancause recessions. It also shows how monetary and fiscal policy can prevent recessions by responding to these shocks. These economistsconsider it wasteful not to use these policy instruments to stabilize theeconomy.Other economists are critical of the government’s attempts to stabilizethe economy. These critics argue that the government should take a hands-off approach to macroeconomic policy. At first, this view mightseem surprising. If our model shows how to prevent or reduce theseverity of recessions, why do these critics want the government to refrain from using monetary and fiscal policy for economic stabilization?

Page 3: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

3

Economists distinguish between two types of lagsthat are relevant for the conduct of stabilization policy: the inside lag and the outside lag.

The inside lag is the time between a shock to the economy and thepolicy action responding to that shock. This lag arises because it takes time for policymakers first to recognize that a shock has occurred and then to put appropriate policies into effect to deal with it.

The outside lag is the time between a policy action and its influenceon the economy. This lag arises because policies do not immediatelyinfluence spending, income, and employment.

Page 4: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

4

Some policies, called automatic stabilizers, are designed to reducelags associated with stabilization policy. Automatic stabilizers arepolicies that stimulate or depress the economy when necessarywithout any deliberate policy change. For example, the system ofincome taxes automatically reduces taxes when the economy goesinto a recession, without any change in the tax laws, because individuals and corporations pay less tax when their incomes fall.Similarly, the unemployment insurance and welfare systems automatically raise transfer payments when the economy moves into a recession, because more people apply for benefits. One canview these automatic stabilizers as a type of fiscal policy withoutany inside lag.

Page 5: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

5

As we learned, since policy only affects the economyafter a long lag, successful stabilization requires the ability to predict future economic conditions.One way forecasters try to look ahead is with leading indicators. Aleading indicator is a data series that fluctuates in advance of the economy. A large fall in a leading indicator signals that a recessionis more likely to occur in coming months.Another way forecasters look ahead is with macroeconometric models,which have been developed by both government agencies and by private firms. They seek to predict variables such as unemployment andinflation and other endogenous variables.

Page 6: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

6

Nobel laureate Robert Lucas emphasized that people form expectationsof the future. Expectations play a crucial role because they influence all sorts of economic behavior. Both households and firms decide to consume and invest based on expectations of future earnings. These expectations depend on many things, including the policies of the government. He argues that traditional methods of policyevaluation such as those that rely on standard macroeconometric models—do not adequately take into account this impact of policy onexpectations. This criticism of traditional policy evaluation is known as the Lucas Critique.

Page 7: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

7

Policy is conducted by rule if policymakers announce in advance howpolicy will respond to various situations and commit themselves tofollowing through on this announcement. Policy is conducted bydiscretion if policymakers are free to size up events as they occur andchoose whatever policy the policymakers consider appropriate at the time.The debate over rules versus discretion is distinct from the debate overpassive versus active policy. Policy can be conducted by rule and yet beeither passive or active.

An active policy rule might specify:money growth = 3% + (Unemployment Rate – 6%)This rule tries to stabilize the economy by raising money growth whenthe economy is in a recession.

Page 8: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

8

Opportunism in economic policy arises when the objectives of policymakers conflict with the well-being of the public. Some economists fear that politicians care only about winning elections, and thus choose policies that further their own electoral ends.

A president might cause a recession soon after coming into office to lower inflation and then stimulate the economy as the next election approaches to lower unemployment; this would ensure that both inflation and unemployment are low on election day.

Manipulation of the economy for electoral gain is called the political business cycle.

Page 9: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

9

Opportunistic policymakers take advantage of an exploitable Phillip’s curve and face naïve voters who

forget the past, are unaware of the policymakers’incentives, and do not understand how the economy

works. In particular, politicians don’t take into account thetradeoff between inflation and unemployment when their

political gain is at stake.

Opportunistic policymakers take advantage of an exploitable Phillip’s curve and face naïve voters who

forget the past, are unaware of the policymakers’incentives, and do not understand how the economy

works. In particular, politicians don’t take into account thetradeoff between inflation and unemployment when their

political gain is at stake.

Page 10: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

10

Policymakers announce in advance the policy they will follow to influence the expectations of private decisionmakers.

But, later, after the private decisionmakers have acted on the basisof their expectations, these policymakers may be tempted to renegeon their announcement.

Page 11: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

11

1) To encourage investment, the government announces that it will nottax income from capital. But, after factories are built, the governmentis tempted to raise taxes.

2) To encourage research, the government announces that it will givea temporary monopoly to companies that discover new drugs. But,after the drugs have been discovered, the government is tempted torevoke the patent.

3) To encourage hard work, your professor announces that this coursewill end with an exam. But, after you studied and learned all the material, the professor is tempted to cancel the exam so that he orshe won’t have to grade it.

Page 12: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

12

P

Y

P*

AD

Y

LRAS

Y''

Monetarists are economists who advocate that the Fed keep the money supply growing at a steady rate. Monetarists believe that fluctuations in the money supply are responsible for most large fluctuations in the economy.

Y'

AD'

Here we can see that this economy isgrowing (LRAS is shifting rightward)so continued increases in the supply ofmoney (via +AD) don’t necessarilyimply increases in inflation.AD''

Page 13: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

13

A second policy rule that economists widely advocate is nominalGDP targeting. Under this rule, the Fed announces a planned pathfor nominal GDP. If nominal GDP rises above the target, the Fedreduces money growth to dampen aggregate demand. If it fallsbelow the target, the Fed raises money growth to stimulate aggregatedemand.

Because a nominal GDP target allows monetary policy to adjust to changes in the velocity of money, most economists believe it would lead to greater stability in output and prices than a monetarist policy rule.

Page 14: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

14

We have looked at whether policy should take an active orpassive role in responding to fluctuations in the economy, andwhether policy should be conducted by rule or discretion.

Although there is persistent debate between both sides, there isone clear conclusion: no simple and compelling casefor any particular view of macroeconomic policy has been made.

In the end, one must weigh the various political and economicarguments and decide what role the government should play instabilizing the economy.

Page 15: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

15

In the late 80s, many of the world’s central banks adopted someform of inflation targeting. Sometimes inflation targeting takes theform of central bank announcing its policy intentions.

The Federal Reserve has not adopted an explicit policy of inflationtargeting (although some commentators have suggested that it is,implicitly, targeting inflation at about 2 percent).

Page 16: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

16

Economist, John Taylor has proposed a simple rule for the federalfunds rate:

Nominal Federal Funds Rate = Inflation + 2.0 + 0.5 (Inflation – 2.0) – 0.5 (GDP gap)

The GDP gap is the percentage shortfall of real GDP from an estimateof it natural level. The Taylor Rule has the real federal funds rate— the nominal rate minus inflation responding to inflation and the GDP gap.

Page 17: CHAP14.Stab Policy

Chapter Fourteen

17

Inside and outside lagsAutomatic stabilizersLucas critiquePolitical business cycleTime inconsistencyMonetaristsInflation targetingTaylor rule

Inside and outside lagsAutomatic stabilizersLucas critiquePolitical business cycleTime inconsistencyMonetaristsInflation targetingTaylor rule