chap. 11 plc portfolio planning

25
Chapter 11 Jobber Managing products: product life cycle, portfolio planning and product growth strategies

Upload: ericmoe18

Post on 28-Jul-2015

108 views

Category:

Marketing


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Chapter 11 Jobber

Managing products: product life cycle,

portfolio planning and product growth

strategies

Product Life Cycle

Alternative PLC Patterns

Cadbury’s Caramel

Cadbury’s Caramel has

been marketed for many

years, but still receives

advertising support to

stimulate sales in a maturemarket.

Product Life Cycle

Uses.• Product termination.• Growth projections.• Marketing objectives and strategies

over the PLC.• Product planning.• The dangers of overpowering.

Nokia

The Nokia 5310 XpressMusic

includes a music player and FM

radio.

Marketing objectives and strategies over the product life cycle

Product Life Cycle

Limitations.

• Fads and classics.

• Marketing effects.

• Unpredictability.

• Misleading objective and strategy prescriptions.

Portfolio planning

Definition.

The process of managing products as groups (portfolios) rather than separate, distinct and independent entities.

Boston matrix

The Boston Consulting Group Growth-Share Matrix

Stars Problem children

Cash cows Dogs

7%

15%

0%

MarketGrowthRate

Market Share10 0

Strategic objectives and theBoston Box

Build sales and/or market share

Invest to maintain/increase leadership position

Repel competitive challenges

Stars

Build selectivelyFocus on defendable niche where

dominance can be achievedHarvest or divest the rest

Problem children

Harvest orDivest orFocus on defendable niche

DogsHold sales and/or market shareDefend positionUse excess cash to support stars,

selected problem children and new product development

Cash cows

Strategic objectives and theBoston Box

Build selectively Focus on defendable niche

where dominance can be achieved

Harvest or divest the rest

Problem children

Harvest orDivest orFocus on defendable niche

Dogs

Build sales and/or market shareInvest to maintain/increase

leadership positionRepel competitive challenges

Stars

Hold sales and/or market shareDefend positionUse excess cash to support stars,

selected problem children and new product development

Cash cows

Strategic objectives and theBoston Box

Hold sales and/or market share

Defend position Use excess cash to support

stars, selected problem children and new product development

Cash cows

Build selectivelyFocus on defendable niche where

dominance can be achievedHarvest or divest the rest

Problem children

Harvest orDivest orFocus on defendable niche

Dogs

Build sales and/or market shareInvest to maintain/increase

leadership positionRepel competitive challenges

Stars

Strategic objectives and theBoston Box

Build sales and/or market shareInvest to maintain/increase

leadership positionRepel competitive challenges

StarsBuild selectivelyFocus on defendable niche where

dominance can be achievedHarvest or divest the rest

Problem children

Harvest or Divest or Focus on defendable niche

DogsHold sales and/or market shareDefend positionUse excess cash to support stars,

selected problem children and new product development

Cash cows

The case of an unbalanced portfolio

High

Low

LowHigh

Mar

ket g

row

th ra

te

Market share

Boston example

Boston example

Criticisms of the Boston Box

• Cash flow predictions.

• Market share and market growth focus.

• Use of proxies.

• Market share preoccupation.

• Interdependencies.

• Building stars.

Criticisms of the Boston Box

• Competitor reactions.

• Self-funding assumption.

• ‘Market’ definition vagueness.

• Use of cash flow rather than profitability for resource allocation.

• Lack of precision.

The General Electric Market Attractiveness–Competitive Position Model

High

Low

LowHighCompetitive strength

Medium

Medium

1

2

5

4

3

Mar

ket a

ttra

ctive

ness

Market attractiveness

• Market size• Market growth rate• Beatable rivals• Market entry barriers• Social, political and legal factors

Competitive strength

• Market share• Reputation• Distribution capability• Market knowledge• Service quality• Innovation capability• Cost advantages

Criticisms of the GE Portfolio Model

• Difficulty of use.

• Managerial bias.

Implications of portfolio planning

Different products

Different roles

Different reward systems

Different types of managers