ch01 historical perspective

31
Sub-chapter 1 Historical Perspective Historical Perspective FID26002 Safety Management

Upload: malaysian-france-institut

Post on 07-Nov-2014

568 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


4 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ch01    historical perspective

Sub-chapter 1

Historical PerspectiveHistorical Perspective

FID26002Safety Management

Page 2: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

2

Course ObjectivesCourse Objectives

• To describe the historical development of OSH management over the centuries

• To recall the background to the development of OSHA:1994 legislation and its underlying philosophy

• To recall the development of occupational safety and health management system

Page 3: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

3

Course TopicsCourse Topics

• OSH before and during the industrial revolution

• Development in OSH management between the 1930’s and 1970’s

• Development of self-regulation legislation• Modern OSH management

Page 4: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

4

Early Recognition Of Early Recognition Of Occupational DiseasesOccupational Diseases

• In 1473 a German physician, Ellenborg, published the first known pamphlets on occupational disease from gold miners.

• In 1556 the German scholar, Agricola, described the diseases of miners.

• In 1713 Ramazzini, who is regarded as the father of occupational medicine, suggested that in diagnosis doctors should ask patients about their occupations.

Page 5: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

5

Emergence Of Industrial Emergence Of Industrial Accident - 1 Accident - 1

• Industrial accidents arose out of the Factory System during the Industrial Revolution in Britain in 18th Century (1700s).

• Women and children worked as heavy labourers under unsafe and unhealthy workplaces.

Page 6: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

6

Emergence Of Industrial Emergence Of Industrial Safety LegislationSafety Legislation

• In 1833 English Factory Acts was the first effective industrial safety law.

• It provide compensation for accidents rather than to control their causes.

• Insurance companies inspected work places and suggested prevention methods

• Problem:• Safety became Injury and insurance oriented

Page 7: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

7

Emergence Of Safety Emergence Of Safety Management - 1Management - 1

• Role of Herbert W. Heinrich (1930’s), – Developed Domino Theory and

promoted control of workers behaviour.• Problem;

•Focused on worker behaviour and not management

•Caused people to think that safety is about policing worker

Page 8: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

8

Emergence Of Safety Emergence Of Safety Management - 2Management - 2

• Frank Bird (1970) developed Loss Control Theory.

• Suggested that underlying cause of accidents are lack of management controls and poor management decisions.

• Problem:– Not so popular: blames management

(responsibility and control).

Page 9: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

9

Emergence Of Safety Emergence Of Safety Management - 3Management - 3

• In 80’s Behavioural Based Safety (BBS) was introduced;

• Based on Heinrich’s findings.• Work by recognizing safe work habits

and offering rewards and punishment. • Problem:

– Focuses on workers and not on hazard or management

– Reward and punishment system have flaws

Page 10: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

10

Emergence Of Safety Emergence Of Safety Management System - 1Management System - 1

• Current development of Occupational Safety And Health management system was driven by two parallel forces:

A. Self-regulatory legislation in the United Kingdom (1974),

B. Quality management movement

Page 11: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

11

A-Self Regulation A-Self Regulation Legislation - 1Legislation - 1

• Lord Robens, Chairman of a Royal Safety Commission Report noted that:– There was too many OSH legislation,– Was fragmented,– Limited in coverage (specific hazards &

workplace),– Out of date and difficult to update,– Inflexible (prescriptive), – People thought that safety was what

government inspectors enforced.

Page 12: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

12

A-Self Regulation A-Self Regulation Legislation - 2Legislation - 2

• Lord Robens recommended– Self regulation

• Report resulted in the Health and Safety of Workers At Work Act in the UK in 1974

• Similar legislation was enacted in Australia in 1984

• Enacted in Malaysia in 1994 after the 1992 Bright Sparkler accident in Sungai Buloh

Page 13: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

13

A-Self Regulation A-Self Regulation Legislation - 3Legislation - 3

• Features of “Robens style” legislation:– General duties of care by:

• Employer, employee, manufacturer, designer, supplier

• Duty of employer to make the workplace safe

– Consultation with employees through Safety Committees

– Safety Officer as advisor and coordinator– Improvement and prohibition notices

Page 14: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

14

A-Self Regulation A-Self Regulation Legislation - 4Legislation - 4

Legislation follow major accidents and reinforce need for management system

ACCIDENT REGULATION/PROGRAMME Flixborough (1974), CIMAH regulation

Bhopal (1984) “Responsible Care” / Process safety

Piper Alpha (1988) Risk Assessment / Management system

Page 15: Ch01    historical perspective

Flixborough (1974),

Page 16: Ch01    historical perspective

Bhopal (1984)

Page 17: Ch01    historical perspective
Page 18: Ch01    historical perspective

Piper Alpha (1988)

Page 19: Ch01    historical perspective
Page 20: Ch01    historical perspective

Adriatic IV & Temseh

Page 21: Ch01    historical perspective
Page 22: Ch01    historical perspective

P-36 Platform

Page 23: Ch01    historical perspective
Page 24: Ch01    historical perspective
Page 25: Ch01    historical perspective

Thunderhorse

Page 26: Ch01    historical perspective

Number of death cases reported from 2000 – 2004

Page 27: Ch01    historical perspective
Page 28: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

28

Quality Management Quality Management Approach to Occupational Approach to Occupational

Safety and Health Safety and Health Management – 1Management – 1

• There are similar issues in safety management as in quality management

• Example:– Productivity– Worker involvement– Proactive approach– Scientific approach– Customer and human rights

Page 29: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

29

Quality Management Quality Management Approach to Occupational Approach to Occupational

Safety and Health Safety and Health Management – 2Management – 2

• Management system standards:– ISO 9000 QMS was proven successful and ISO

14000 EMS was introduced in 1996– UK published BS 8800 and Australia AS8401

OSH management systems in 1996– International and auditable OHSAS 18001

OSH Management System published in 1999– ILO approved an OSH management system

for governments to adopt during 2000

Page 30: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

30

SummarySummary

– The industrial revolution cause of industrial accidents.

– Laws were enacted to compensate and protect workers in 1833.

– Safety management guidelines began with Heinrich and followed by Frank Bird and others.

– Lord Robens in 1972 recommended self-regulatory legislation. Adopted by Malaysia in 1994.

– Outcome of accidents in the 1970s and 1980s resulted in OSH management system today.

Page 31: Ch01    historical perspective

FID26002 - Safety Management

31

SummarySummary

- Health problems due to occupation has been known from ancient times

- Industrial accidents became rampant after the industrial revolution

- Accidents in the 70’s & 80’s resulted in OSH-MS today