cell therapy in cv disease: future directions. 2 anversa p, nadal-ginard b et al. nature....

7
Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions

Upload: margery-hampton

Post on 18-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions. 2 Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3. Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight? “Remaining

Cell Therapy in CV Disease:Future Directions

Page 2: Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions. 2 Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3. Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight? “Remaining

2

Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3.

Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight?

“Remaining young at heart is a desirable but elusive goal. Myocyte regeneration may accomplish just that.

Continuous cell renewal in adult myocardium was thought to be impossible; multipotent stem cells may

be able to renew myocardium and, under certain circumstances, can be coaxed to repair

the broken heart after infarction.”

Page 3: Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions. 2 Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3. Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight? “Remaining

3

Stem cell therapy: More questions than answers?

Routes of delivery Surgical vs percutaneous

Cell type and marker Myoblast vs BM CD 34/ AC133/ SP

Timing of delivery Acute vs chronic

Target patient population Best criteria

Cell origin Embryonic vs adult BM vs peripheral Culture expanded vs fresh

Courtesy of Timothy Henry, MD.

?Dose Dose response

Page 4: Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions. 2 Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3. Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight? “Remaining

4

CCTRN: Addressing gaps in the knowledge baseNHLBI Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network, established January 2007

Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4:403.DCC = Data Coordinating CenterMHI = Minneapolis Heart Institute

Network DCC

Universityof Texas

Network DCC

Universityof Texas

University

of Florida

University

of Florida

Vanderbilt

University

Vanderbilt

University

ClevelandClinic

ClevelandClinic

MHIU of Minn

MHIU of Minn

Texas Heart

Institute

Texas Heart

Institute

Page 5: Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions. 2 Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3. Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight? “Remaining

5

CCTRN: Goal and initial phase I/II clinical trials

Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4:403.

Goal:Accelerate research into use of cell-based therapies in

management of CV diseases

TIME

Effect of timing of post-MI BMC

administration on measures of LV

function

Late TIME

Effect of late (2-3 weeks) post-MI BMC

administration on measures of LV

function

FOCUS

Effect of transmyocardial

BMC administration on measures of LV function in patients

with chronic IHD

Page 6: Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions. 2 Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3. Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight? “Remaining

6

Year 02Year 01 Year 03 Year 05

PRC DSMB Review

Protocol 1 Development

Protocol 1

Protocol 2 Development

PRC DSMB Review

Protocol 2

Protocol 3 Development

Protocol 3

PRC DSMB Review

Courtesy Timothy Henry, MD.

CCTRN: Timeline of trials

Year 04

Page 7: Cell Therapy in CV Disease: Future Directions. 2 Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B et al. Nature. 2002;415:240-3. Cardiac renewal: Is the goal in sight? “Remaining

7

Summary

• Current clinical efforts have focused in three overlapping areas: – Repair of myocardium after MI– Reconstitution of myocardium in setting of chronic HF– Therapeutic angiogenesis

• Promising early clinical experience with BMC, endothelial cells, and skeletal myoblasts

• Numerous questions regarding techniques and mechanism of benefit remain– Ongoing trials by the NHLBI CCTRN and other research groups

should provide insight