ceat case analysis

7/31/2019 CEAT Case Analysis

1/13

CASE ANALYSIS DECISION TREE

METHOD

PRAGYA SHARMA 39

SUJATA SHETTY

40

COLLIN CORNELIO

03

POONAM SANAS 3

5

DEEPAK GIANANI

12

GROUP5


2/13

FACTS

Mechanistic Organization

MCM comprises of 16 people from the top

management

Vintis 1st experience as OD Head

Sushma - expert in Appreciative Inquiry MCM discussed only operational issues.

Key players Rahul,Vinti,Gurpriet,Sushma

Facts


3/13

Problem Identification

Macro

No proper need

identification

One size fits all

approach

No inter-functional

dialogue Issues of

communication

Micro

Unaware of own

management

styles

Low appreciation

of self & others


4/13


5/13

Problem Identification

Immediate

No sense of urgency Identifying the need for change

MCM No value addition to company

ShortTerm

Rigid devotion to AI Issues of communication between departments

Expectations from HR not being met

LongTerm

Wastage of Human Capital

Low on Competitiveness


6/13

SYSTEMS AFFECTED

Organization

Not

affected

Groups -

Affected

Individual

Not

affected


7/13

SOLUTIONS

Macro

John Kotters 8Step for

Implementation of

Change

Action ResearchModel

Micro Employee

Empowerment

Develop

Transformational Leaders


8/13


9/13

SOLUTIONS

Immediate

Need of Survey Feedback method

ShortTerm

HR should play role of Employee Champion Dave Ulrich

LongTerm

Improve on Internal Processes

Decrease Horizontal Differentiation

Increase Delegation, Accountability


10/13

Decision Tree Method

5. Course of Action (consequences of

acceptance or rejection of an alternative)

Micro level, Macro level.

Structural, Process

Immediate, Short term, Long term

Individual, Group, Organizational


11/13


12/13

Decision Tree Method

6.Decision taken

Micro level, Macro level.

Structural, Process

Immediate, Short term, Long term

Individual, Group, Organizational


13/13

Decision taken

ceat case analysis

Documents