cc no.56/1/11 ps malviya nagar - the judgment...

38
CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant is present. IO is also present. He submits that in the present matter charge sheet is ready and shall be submitted within a week. Be listed for clarifications as regards final report for 24.07.2013. (Chetna Singh) MM-02/SD/16.07.2013

Upload: dangnhi

Post on 18-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

CC No.56/1/11

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: Counsel for the complainant is present.

IO is  also present.  He submits   that   in   the  present matter  charge 

sheet is ready and shall be submitted within a week.

Be listed for clarifications as regards final report for 24.07.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 2: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

Mansoora Vs Badeer & Ors.

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the complainant.

Matter was listed for ATR however, copy of the complaint has not 

been supplied for ATR.

Complainant has not appeared.

Court notice be issued upon the complainant for 29.07.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 3: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No. 158/13

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Present charge sheet is listed for consideration.

IO is stated to be on leave.

Let him be summoned afresh for clarifications for 23.07.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 4: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

DD No-61-BPS- Malviya Nagar16.07.2013

Statement of accused Sandeep Dagar S/o Sh. Charan Singh R/o H. No. 212, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi.

On SA.

I am the accused in this case of Police Station Malviya Nagar U/s.

28/112 D.P. Act. I plead guilty voluntarily for the offence U/s 28/112 D.P. Act

without any pressure, threat or coercion from any person. I pray for leniency.

RO & AC (Chetna Singh)MM-02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 5: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

IN THE COURT OF MS CHETNA SINGH, METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE: SOUTH, SAKET: NEW DELHI

CHARGEFIR No. 181/03PS Malviya Nagar

I, Chetna Singh, Metropolitan Magistrate, SOUTH, Saket, New Delhi do

hereby charge you accused Praveen Kumar Sangwan s/o Sh. Raj Kishan

Sangwan as under:-

That on 07.04.2003 at about 6.00pm at H. No. Road Sare Aam, Kalindi

Kunj, Yamuna bridge, New Delhi within the jurisdiction of PS malviya nagar

you committed forgery of RC for the purpose of cheating by producing a fake

registration certificate of car bearing no. HR-10E-4743 allegedly obtained from

Transport Authority, Sonipat, Haryana on 30.06.2002 in the name of Satyapal

s/o Sh. Surender Singh with the dishonest intention and knowledge and

thereby used the forged RC as genuine and also used counterfeit fee with

intention to commit forgery and thereby committed an offence punishable U/s

468/471/472/34 IPC and within cognizance of this court.

And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court for the above said

offence.

M.M/Saket/New Delhi

16.07.2013

The charge is read over and explained to the accused and he is questioned as follows:

Q. Do you plead guilty or claim trial ?A. I plead not guilty and claim trial.

RO&AC MM-02/Saket/ New Delhi16.07.2013

Page 6: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

IN THE COURT OF MS CHETNA SINGH, METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE: SOUTH, SAKET: NEW DELHI

FIR No. 218/10PS Malviya Nagar

AMENDED CHARGE

I, Chetna Singh, Metropolitan Magistrate, SOUTH, Saket, New Delhi do hereby

charge you accused Mahboob Khan s/o Late Sh. Babu Khan as under:-

That on 28.05.2010 at shop no. 257, Hauz Rani, at about 7.00pm, within the

jurisdiction of PS Malviya Nagar, you committed house trespass by entering into the

aforementioned meat shop belonging to complainant Rafeeq when same was in the

possession of his son Majid and you along with your associates namely Naseem

Begum, Shamim Begum and Salauddin remained there unlawfully with intention to

disposes him from there in furtherance of your common intention and thereby

committed an offence punishable U/s 448/34 IPC and within the cognizance of this

Court.

That it is also in evidence against you that on the same date, time and place

you had entered into the shop of complainant Rafeequddin and you were caught red

handed at the spot while stealing the various articles as per seizure memo mark X and

your were found in possession of the same as per seizure memo which you had stolen

yourself in furtherance of your common intention with your aforementioned associates

or had reason to believe the same to be stolen property and threatened the

complainant with death and thereby committed an offence punishable U/s 380/411/506

Part II/34 IPC and within the cognizance of this Court.

And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court for the above said offence.

M.M/Saket/New Delhi /16.07.2013

The charge is read over and explained to the accused person and he is questioned as follows:

Q. Do you plead guilty or claim trial ?A. I plead not guilty and claim trial.

RO&AC MM-02/Saket/ New Delhi16.07.2013

Page 7: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.383/10

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused with counsel.

Matter is at the stage of arguments of charge.

An   application   u/s   91   Cr.P.C.   was   filed   on   behalf   of   accused 

Devender Kumar for seeking directions to the IO to produce certain documents. 

Copy   of   this   application   has   already   been   supplied   upon   Ld.   APP   for   state 

however, he is absent today and accordingly, no submissions have been made on 

his behalf.

Today another copy of the said application has been filed by the 

accused.

Let notice of this application be issued upon the IO.

Copy of this application be sent upon IO.

IO   to   be   present   along   with   report   for   submissions   on   this 

application for the next date of hearing i.e. 27.08.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 8: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.1045/03

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused Azhar and Shamsher are PO.

Matter has been compounded qua accused Naeem vide order dated 

14.03.2013.

Accused Danish is present.

Today IO was to be examined in this matter, him being last witness 

to be examined.

At this stage, an application for plea bargaining has been moved on 

behalf of the accused Danish.

In view of the fact stated in the application, file be put up before 

Ld. CMM, South for MSD for 20.07.2013.

Accused Danish to appear before Ld. CMM, South for 20.07.2013 

at 2.00pm.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 9: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.1236/07

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused with counsel.

Let PW at serial no. 2, 4 and 5 be summoned for the next date of 

hearing i.e. 30.08.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 10: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.746/08

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused is PO.

Summons  upon   the  complainant   through   the  office  of   the  DCP 

received back unexecuted.

In   view   of   the   same,   no   examination   u/s   299   Cr.P.C.   can   be 

conducted.

File be consigned to record room to be reopened as and when any clue as

regards accused is found.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 11: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.312/12

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused with counsel.

Let PW at serial no. 7 and 8 be summoned for the next date of 

hearing i.e. 23.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 12: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

CC No.29/1/12

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the complainant.

No citation filed.

Be listed for clarifications/arguments on summoning on 27.08.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 13: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.217/12

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

All four accused with counsel.

Deficient copies have supplied to the accused persons.

Be listed for scrutiny/arguments on charge on 16.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 14: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

Mohit Kumar Vs Vijendra Chauhan & Ors.

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the complainant.

Certain clarifications are required on the point of summoning.

Be listed for this purpose on 27.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 15: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.442/04

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused is absent.

Matter is at the stage of PE.

NBW be issued against the accused along with notice upon surety 

through the IO for 10.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 16: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.161/12

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused Karan Basvani is absent (Exemption sought on his behalf. 

Granted for today only).

Matter listed for arguments on notice.

Be listed for this purpose on 05.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 17: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.162/12

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

All the four accused persons are absent.

Matter is at the stage of arguments on charge.

As all the four accused persons are absent. NBW be issued against 

them   along   with   notice   upon   their   respective   sureties   through   the   IO   for 

05.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 18: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.231/03

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused Manu Sharma, Yogesh and Praveen are present.

Accused Vikas is absconder.

Matter listed for PE.

Let PW at serial no. 1 be summoned afresh through the IO for the 

next date of hearing i.e. 21.10.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 19: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.181/03

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused Ashik Hussain is PO.

Accused Praveen is present.

Accused   Vikas,   Yogesh   and   Manu   Sharma   have   already   been 

discharged vide order dated 03.10.2011.

Matter listed for framing of charge qua accused Praveen today.

On perusal  of   the   file   charge  u/s  468/471/472   IPC qua  accused 

Praveen is made out.

Charge framed.

Be listed for PE with complainant to be summoned for 21.10.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 20: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.218/10

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

All   the   accused   persons   namely   Ms   Shameem  Begum,   Naseem 

Begum, Salauddin and Mehboob Khan are present.

PW complainant Rafiquddin is also present for PE.

A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that additional charge u/s 506 

Part II IPC qua accused Mahboob Khan has required to be made out. 

In view of the same, amended charge framed qua accused Mahboob 

Khan.

Matter be listed for PE on 18.09.2013.

PW Rafiquddin is bound down for the next date of hearing.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 21: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.548/03

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused Surender is PO.

Accused Sameer @ Guddu is present on bail.

Matter listed for arguments on charge qua accused Sameer.

Be listed for this purpose on 23.08.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 22: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No­272/13PS­ Malviya Nagar U/s­323/379/411/34 IPC16.07.2013.Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the State.

Accused is stated to be in JC.

Ld. Counsel is present qua accused Sunder Singh @ Sundari

An application  for grant of  bail  of accused Sunder Singh under 

section 437 Cr.P.C has been moved on behalf of the accused by Ld. Counsel.

Reply has been filed by the IO, as per which it has been stated 

that one boy forcefully pushed the complainant in his cab and took his mobile 

phone and purse with the help of other two boys. It is further stated that the 

complainant was also hit with iron rod when he resisted and on his raising alarm 

the accused persons ran away.

IO has strongly opposed the bail application stating that the co­

accused Manish @ Golu is yet to be arrested and weapon of offence i.e. iron 

rod and purse are yet to be recovered along with offending vehicle bearing no. 

UP­17T­3343.

Submissions on   the  bail  application made on behalf  of   the Ld. 

Substitute APP for the State and Ld. Counsel for the accused.

Heard.

The   allegations   made   by   the   complainant   clearly   reveals   the 

ingredients of the offence of the robbery are made out however, the IO in the 

present matter instead of registering the case u/s 392 IPC has registered the 

present case u/s 327/379/411/34 IPC. 

Page 23: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

­2­

Considering the grave nature of allegations against the accused, I do not 

deem  it   fit   to   grant   bail   to   the  accused  at   this   stage  and  accordingly,   bail 

application is dismissed.

Copy   of   this   order   be   given   dasti   to   the   counsel   for   the 

accused/applicant.

At the same time, SHO be summoned for clarifications as regards 

the sections under which the present FIR has been registered for 17.07.2013 at 

12.30pm.

Copy of this order be sent along with notice upon SHO.

(CHETNA SINGH)MM­02(South)

16.07.2013.

Page 24: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

IN THE COURT OF MS CHETNA SINGH, METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE: SOUTH, SAKET: NEW DELHI

CHARGEFIR NO. 121/12PS- Malviya Nagar

I, Chetna Singh, Metropolitan Magistrate, SOUTH, Saket, New

Delhi do hereby charge you accused Krishan s/o Sh. Ramvir and 2. Bholu

Sharma s/o Sh. Data Ram Sharma as under:-

That on 26.03.13 at 12.10am at APJ School, Sheikh Sarai,

Malviya Nagar, New Delhi within the jurisdiction of PS Malviya Nagar, you both

in furtherance of your common intention wrongfully restrained the complainant

by pushing towards the side of the road and taking away his mobile phone

and purse without his consent which was thereafter recovered from the

possession of accused Krishan and thus thereby committed an offence

punishable U/s 392/411/34 IPC and within cognizance of this court.

M.M/ Saket/New Delhi

16.07.2013

The charge is read over and explained to the accused and he is questioned as follows:

Q. Do you plead guilty or claim trial ?A. I plead not guilty and claim trial.A. I plead not guilty and claim trial.

RO&AC M.M-06/ Saket/New Delhi 16.07.2013

Page 25: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.121/13

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused Bholu Sharma produced from JC.

Accused Krishan is present on bail.

Charge for the offence u/s 392/411/34 IPC has been framed against 

both accused to which they have pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

Be listed for PE with PW at serial no. 1 be summoned for the next 

date of hearing i.e. 13.08.2013 and Rehnumai on 30.07.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 26: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.432/09

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Convict Jai Bhagwan produced from JC.

Convict Deepak is also present.

Matter listed for orders on sentence.

Ld. Defence counsel on behalf of the accused is also absent.

Previous involvement report of both the accused persons be called 

through SHO for 17.07.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 27: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.258/13

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the state.

Accused Waseem with counsel.

An   application   for   cancellation   of   non   bailable   warrant   against 

accused waseem has been filed.

On account of reasons stated, NBW qua accused Waseem stands 

cancelled.

Further, accused is admitted to court bail on furnishing a bail bond 

in   the   sum   of   Rs.   20,000/­   with   one   surety   in   the   like   amount.   Bail   bond 

furnished   and   accepted   vide   separate   endorsement.   Accused   be   released 

forthwith.

Be listed for 17.07.2013 along with Muttha.

Copy of this order be given dasti if requested.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 28: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.239/12

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the state.

Accused with counsel.

Matter listed for scrutiny/committal.

In   the   present   matter   arrest   of   the   accused   has   been   stayed   by 

Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide order dated 08.03.2013.

In view of the same, file be put up before Ld. District Judge for 

committal.

Ahlmad  is  directed   to   send  the   file   to   the  court  of  Ld.  District 

Judge (South) and Ld.  Additional Sessions Judge complete  in all   respects  for 

19/07/2013 at 2.00pm. 

Accused is directed to appear before Ld. District Judge (South) and 

Ld. Additional Sessions Judge on the above said date.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 29: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

CC No.43/1

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: Complainant with counsel.

Arguments on application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. advanced.

Citations filed.

Be listed for orders at 4.00pm.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

At 4.00pm

Present: Ld. Counsel for the complainant.

Certain clarifications are required from the IO as regards ATR filed 

by him. As he has submitted that no police action is warranted in this case as no 

cognizable offence is made out.

IO to remain present for clarification for 23.07.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 30: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

CC No.581/1

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: Complainant with counsel.

CW­1 Amarjeet Kaur examined and discharged.

Be listed for pre summoning CE on 21.10.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 31: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.538/12

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the state.

Accused Haneef produced from JC.

Accused Jamshed is absent.

An   application   for   issuance   of   production   warrant   against   the 

accused Jamshed has been moved on behalf of the accused Jamshed Hussain.

It is stated by way of present application that the accused Jamshed 

is in Dasna Jail at Ghaziabad, U.P. in case FIR no. 375/13, PS Sahibabad (U.P), 

u/s 379/420/411/34 IPC.

In  view of   the   same,  production  warrant  be   issued  qua  accused 

Jamshed as per particulars mentioned above for 30.07.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 32: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.841/02

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused is absent.

Two PWs present are discharged as unexamined.

As the accused is absent.  NBW be issued against him along with 

notice upon surety through the IO for 18.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 33: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.1134/06

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused with counsel.

PW Smt. Mainda is absent despite service. B/W be issued qua her 

in the sum of Rs. 5000/­ through the IO concerned for the next date of hearing 

i.e. 20.09.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 34: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.244/06

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

All four accused with counsel.

PW­5  ASI  Lokender  Tyagi  has  been  examined  and  partly   cross 

examined. His further cross examination has been deferred on account of video 

conferencing as I am duty MM. 

Let   this   witness   be   summoned   afresh   for   his   remaining   cross 

examination along with PW at serial no. 3 and 7 to be summoned for the next 

date of hearing i.e. 23.08.2013.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 35: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.731/01

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Accused with counsel.

PW HC Om Prakash is also present.

It is submitted by Ld. Defence counsel that examination in chief of 

PW­2 Ct. Shripal has been deferred.

In view of the same, let PW­2 Ct. Shripal be summoned through the 

IO for 19.08.2013.

PW HC Om Prakash present is discharged as unexamined.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 36: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

Ajay Sarna Vs Rajinder Kumar & Ors.

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the complainant.

Be awaited till 12.30pm.

(CHETNA SINGH)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

At 12.30pm

Present: None for the complainant.

Be awaited till 2.30pm.

(CHETNA SINGH)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

At 2.30pm

Present: None for the complainant.

Perusal of the file shows that for the past several dates none has 

appeared  on  behalf  of   the  complainant.  Complainant  has  not  been  appearing 

despite court notice received back executed.  

It seems that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the 

present complaint any further. Hence, present complaint is dismissed in default 

and for non prosecution.

File be consigned to record room.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013

Page 37: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

DD No­61­B dated 25.09.2010PS­Malviya NagarUnder Section: 28/112 D.P. Act16.07.2013Present: Ld. APP for the state.

Accused in person.

Accused states that he wants to plead guilty voluntarily for 

the   offence   punishable   under   section   28/112   D.P.   Act.   He   has   been 

explained the consequences of the same, however, he feels sorry for the 

offence committed by him under section 28/112 D.P. Act. Confession of 

accused has been recorded on a separate sheet of paper.

Heard and record perused.

Considering   the   facts   and   circumstances   of   the   case, 

accused stands convicted for the offence punishable under section 28/112 

D.P. Act and is sentenced to pay fine of Rs.50/­. Fine paid.

Closure report be filed by SHO on 24.07.2013.

PB/SB   stands   cancelled.   Surety,   if   any,   be   discharged. 

Original document, if any, be returned. Endorsement, if any, be cancelled.

File be listed on 24.07.2013.

Copy of order be annexed along with notice upon SHO. 

(CHETNA SINGH)MM­02(SOUTH)

16.07.2013

Page 38: CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar - The Judgment …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...CC No.56/1/11 PS Malviya Nagar 16.07.2013 Present: Counsel for the complainant

FIR No.338/13

PS Malviya Nagar

16.07.2013

Present: None for the state.

Both FIR put up before me by Ahlmad.

A perusal of the contents of FIRs reveal that both arise out of the 

same quarrel which took place on 12.07.2013. The allegations are similar in both 

FIR. However, one has been registered u/s 341/323/34 IPC and the other bearing 

no. 337/13 has been registered u/s 308/323/34 IPC.

SHO to appear and explain the reasons for registering these two 

FIRs under different sections when the facts are similar in both.

Be listed for 18.07.2013 at 12.30pm.

Copy of this order be sent along with notice upon SHO for his reply 

and appearance.

(Chetna Singh)MM­02/SD/16.07.2013