cbs corporation - first quarter 2014 groundwater ... · re-" first quarter 2014...

®CBS 20 STANWIX STREET, 10TM FLOOR

Pll-I’SBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15222

November 23, 2015

To: DISTRIBUTION

Dorothy M. Alke ¯ Vice President, Environmental Projects

¯ 412.642.2562 Telephone

412.642.3014 Fax

[email protected]

Re-" First Quarter 2014 Groundwater.Investigation Plan for Operable Unit 2 Bennett’s Dump, Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana

1.0 BACKGROUND

This report summarizes the results of groundwater, surface water, flow and water level monitoring work completed by CBS Corporation during the first quarter of 2014 at the Bennett’s Dump site. The work was performed for the purpose of assessing the feasibility of capturing PCB-contaminated shallow groundwater and to support the engineering design of an effective capture and treat system.

Monitoring activities in accordance with the December 2009 Final Bennett’s Dump Groundwater Investigation Plan for Operable Unit 2 (GWIP) were performed at surface water and groundwater locations including test pits, quarries, piezometers, monitoring wells, springs and streams as¯ summarized in Table 1.

The Bennett’s Dump Groundwater Investigation Plan comprises different monitoring schemes for the periods before and after construction of the Passive Quarry Drain. Pre-quarry drain construction monitoring activities were performed until completion of the quarry drain at the beginning of September 2010. The post-quarry drain monitoring program includes all of the locations and monitoring requirements .formerly prescribed by the Long Term Groundwater Monitoring Plan (LTGMP). Therefore, quarterly reporting under the GWIP will replace LTGMP reporting, pending the development and approval of a final LTGMP.

In November 2013, an Infiltration Galley for the recovery of shallow groundwater was installed in Bennett’s Dump site grid B13, as shown on Figure 1. A dry-season pilot test was conducted November 5-11, 2013 to evaluate the infiltration gallery’s potential for reducing migration of PCBs from the site into Stout’s Creek in the area downstream from Middle Spring. This was the initial stage of such testing. Results of the November 2013 initial stage pilot test were distributed by email to the parties on January 7, 2014.

November 23, 2015

An extended, wet-season pilot test of the Infiltration Gallery was in preparation during March 2014, including baseline sampling at Stout’s Creek segment stations. Those activities are to be reported separately and are not included in this report.

2.0 SURFACE WATER MONITORING

The monitoring work described in this report was performed during January - March, 2014. This three month period constituted the first reporting quarter of 2014 for the Bennett’s Dump site.

Scope of Work

The scope of water sampling for January-MarCh 2014 comprised collecting samples at Stout’s Creek Upstream and Downstream stations, Middle Spring, Rusty Spring and Icebox Quarry. North Spring, Mid-North Spring and Mound Spring were not observed flowing during the first quarter.

Sample Collection and Handling

Samples at the spring and stream locations were collected by carefully filling a new disposable beaker. The water was transferred from the beaker into pre-cleaned amber glass 1-1iter bottles supplied by the analytical laboratory. Routine sampling parameters including temperature and conductivity were measured and recorded.

Samples were analyzed by Pace Analytical Lab of Indianapolis, Indiana. The samples were analyzed to a detection limit of 0.1 parts per billion (ppb) for all PCB parameters by EPA SW-846 method 8082. Beginning in April 2011, Stout’s Creek Downstream samples are analyzed to a detection limit of 0.01 ppb. Samples were also analyzed for total suspended solids (TSS) by method SM2540 D.

Quality Assurance

For quality assurance purposes a duplicate sample and a field blank were collected during each sampling event. All environmental and blank samples were labeled and logged onto a chain of custody form. The samples were stored and transported on ice in insulated coolers. Custody of the water samples was maintained by CBS until shipment to the analytical laboratory.

The field blank sample for 2014 first quarter GWI sampling was BD10770. PCBs were not detected in this sample.

Analgtical Results for Surface Water Samples

Field parameter measurements, PCB analytical results, and QA/QC results for surface water samples collected during this reporting period are reported in Tables 2 through 9. Each table summarizes historical groundwater monitoring data collected since the completion of Passive Quarry Drain in September 2010.

November 23, 2015

Copies .of the chain of custody forms are provided in Appendix A. Copies of the certificates of analysis are provided in Appendix B. A validation summary for these samples appears in Appendix C. Copies of the field sampling data sheets are on file at PSARA’s Bloomington Branch Office.

3.0 FLOW AND WATER LEVEL MONITORING

The purpose of flow and water level monitoring is to evaluate site-specific data characterizing site hydrologic response under storm and non-storm conditions, and to evaluate correlations between PCB concentrations, spring flow and groundwater elevations. The goals are to assess the feasibility and support the engineering design of a system to capture and treat Middle Spring flows and nearby shallow groundwater.

Scope of Work

The scope of groundwater level and flow monitoring during this reporting period involved numerous manual measurements and observations, as well as the use of dedicated instrumentation to record water level and other parameters as summarized in Table 10. The instrument at Mound Spring was removed in the third quarter 2012, during an extended dry period, and will be re- installed if adequate .flow resumes.

The approximate locations of the stations are shown on Figure 1.

Flow and Water Level Plots

Middle Spring flowed throughout the first quarter. Mound Spring was not observed to flow during the January-March period. Therefore there are no plots of Mound Spring flow. Manual observations made at Mound Spring during the first quarter were added to the plots of Middle Spring flow.

Flow observations at on-site springs also are presented in Table 11. An Excel spreadsheet file, including water level and flow observation data, accompanies this report as an attached file: BD GWIP Water Level Observations with plots - Q1 2014.xlsx.

Quality Assurance

An instrument maintenance log for the Bennett’s Dump installations is provided in Appendix D. This log details the installation, re-indexing, and maintenance histories of the data logging equipment present at Bennett’s Dump during the reporting quarter.

November 23, 2015

Crest Gauges

The purpose of the crest gauges at Middle Spring and Mound Spring is to provide an indication of maximum flow during each reporting period. Maximum recorded water levels and flows estimated from these data are presented in the instrument maintenance log in Appendix D. Manual observations during the First quarter are presented in Table 11. Mound Spring observations are :included on the Middle Spring flow plots.

Potentiometric Data

Potentiometric contours shown on Figure 1 were developed based on water level measurements taken on March 18, 2014. The specific water level measurement locations are listed in the table :insert on Figure 1.

If you have questions regarding the sampling and flow/water level monitoring activities or findings for this reporting period, please call Neill Vaughan at (812) 335-0424.

BP:15-(

Attachments

DISTRIBUTION Tom Alcamo, USEPA Region 5 Douglas Petroff, IDEM Simeon Baker, MCHD

CC:

John Langley, CBU Jeff Lifka, Tetra Tech John Bassett, AECOM Russ Cepko, CBS Mike Hessling, PSARA Patrick Kneip, PSARA Neill Vaughan, PSARA BP Files

List of Tables

1. Groundwater Investigation Plan Monitoring Requirements and Recommended Interim Plan

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

o

10.

11.

12.

Requirements

Post-Quarry Drain PCB Results,







Icebox Quarry Water Samples

Stout’s Creek Upstream

Stout’s Creek Downstream

Mound Spring

Rusty Spring

Middle Spring

Mid-North Spring

Post-Quarry Drain PCB Results, North Spring

Flow and Water Level Monitoring, GWIP Stations

Flow Observations, On-Site Springs

Instrument Maintenance Log (Appendix D)

List of Figures and Plots

Figure 1 - Site Map with Monitoring and Sampling Locations, Potentiometric Surface Contours

Continuous Monitoring Plots Middle Spring Continuous Flow and Mound Spring Flow Observations, January 2014 Middle Spring Continuous Flow and Mound Spring Flow Observations, February 2014 Middle Spring Continuous Flow and Mound Spring Flow Observations, March 2014

Manual Monitoring Plots Bennett’s Dump On-Site Springs Flow and Rain, January 1 to March 31, 2014

Stout’s Creek Downstream Flow and Rain, January 1 to March 31, 2014 Bennett’s Dump Quarries and Pits, Observed Water Levels Bennett’s Dump Monitoring Wells, Observed Water Levels Bennett’s Dump Piezometers, Observed Water Levels

TABLES

Table 1. Groundwater Investigation Plan Monitoring Requirements

and Recommended Interim Plan Requirements

Bennett’s Dump, Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana

Station

Middle Spring

Mound Spring

Middle Spring

Mound Spring

Rusty Spdng



North Spring

Mid-North Spring

Wedge Quan’y

Wedge South Quar~

Test Pit A

Test Pits 1,2,3,and 4

Downstream Quarry Drain

Outlet

Wedge Quarry

Icebox Quarry

Wedge Quarry

Wedge South Quan’y

Icebox Quarry

Test Pit A

Test Pit 4

PZ-H7

PZ-K9SW

PZ-I 11

PZ-LM5

MW-BC-10

MW-B 13

MW-C5

MW-C4A

MW-C3A

MW-I

MW-3

1VF~-6I

MW-6D

1 Frequency

2 weeks prior to drain construction

12 months after drain construction

Monthly after drain construction

or episodic so 12 samples collected

Every 2 weeks after drain construction"


Pre-drain construction - every rain event

Pnst-Drain construction - 5 rain events

Post-drain construction - 5 rain events

Once pre-drain c~nstruction.

After drain construction, if PCBs found

in downstream drain outlet then

individual components monthly


Every 2 weeks after drain construction

After one storm >I"

Quarterly after drain construction

Every 2 weeks before drain construction,


Every 2 weeks before drain construction,


Water Level or Flow

Measurement

¯ Hourly logging of flow, at V-notch weir

V-notch or visual flow estimate

Flow by velocity probe

Flow by velocity probe

Visual tlow estimate

V-notch or visual flow estimate

Water level

Weir, velocity probe or visual flow

estimation, depending upon

conditions

Hourly water level

Water level

Water level

Water level

Sample2

PCBs and TSS

PCBs and TSS

PCBs and TSS

PCBs and TSS

PCBs and TSS

PCBs and TSS

PCBs and TSS

PCBs and TSS

Frequency of monitoring and sampling is quarterly, unless amended by approved Scopes of Work for other GWIP activities.

At time of PCB sample collection, also measure field parameters of conductivity and temperature. 3 Previous Interim recommendations anticipated the March 2012 pumping test and a follow-up pumping test, performed in March-April 2013.

Note: All monitoring requirements subject to change when a final revised LTGMP is developed.

3 Interim Recommendations

Continue Hourly logging

of flow

Monthly samples until test

starts then follow test schedule

Continue this schedule until test

starts, then follow test schedule.

Continue to Sample

Continue to Sample

Discontinue until LTGMON


Continue on monthly schedule


Continue

Continue this schedule

but only with Icebox and PZ-H7

Continue this schedule until test

starts then follow test schedule

but with additional wells and

piezorueters to be determined by

agreement and relevance to

each test.

Table 2. Post-Quarry Drain PCB Results Icebox Quarry

Bennett’s Dump, Bloomington, Indiana

Sampling PCBa, Data TSS, Conductivity, Temperature,

Sample ID Date ppb Validated? mg/L uS/cm °C

BD10772 18-Mar-14 < 0.10 Y < 1 215 6.3

BD10759 27-Dec-13 0.11 Y 3 213 4.2

BDI0679 17-Sep-13 < 0.10 Y 2 217 23

BD10625 13-Jun-13 < 0.10 Y 1 218 25.1

BD10500 19-Mar-13 < 0.10 Y 1 230 5.4

BD10439 19-Dee-12 < 0.10 Y 2 250 7.1

BD10425 20-Sep-12 < 0.10 Y < 1 241 21.9

BD10406 14-Jun-12 < 0.10 Y 1 263 20

BD10371 15-Mar-12 < 0.10 Y < 1 NR NR

BD10337 19-Dec-11 < 0.10 Y 1 264 7.1

BD10308 01-Sep-11 < 0.10 Y < 1 235 26.6

BD10301 17-Aug-ll < 0.10 Y 3 247 26.6

BD10302 17-Aug-11 < 0.10 Y 1 247 26.6

BD10300 30-Jul-ll <0.10 Y 9 231 31.1

BD10294 07-Jul-11 < 0.10. Y < 1 232 28

BD 10292 22-Jun- 11 < 0.10 Y 1 235 25.9

BD10283 31-May-ll < 0.10 Y 6 239 27.5

BD10236 02-Mar-11 < 0.10 Y < 1 250 6.6

BD10208 27-Oct-10 < 0.10 Y < 1 282 17.4

"Samples were analyzed to a detection limit of 0.1 parts per billion (ppb).

Table 3. Post-Quarry Drain PCB Results



Sample ID

BD10769

BD10682

BD10668

BD10640

BD10628

BD10618

BD10458

BD 10452

BD 10447

BD10436

BD 10432

BD 10428

BDI0423

BD10419

BD10414

BD10409

BD10401

BD10394

BD 10387

BD10380

BD10374

BD10368

BD10363

BD10355

BD 10349

BDI0341

BD10331

BD1032!

BD10315

BD10316(dup)

BD10315

BD 10316 (dup)

BD10312

BDI0305

BD10306 (dup)

BD10296

BD10285

BD 10277

BD10267

continued

Sampling

Date

18-Mar-14

28-Oct-13

19-Aug-13

15-Aug-13

29-Ju1-13

23-Apt-13

4-Mar- 13

25-Feb- 13

23-Jan- 13

12-Dec-12

16-Nov- 12

10-Oct-12

12-Sep-12

15-Aug-12

PCB~, Data TSS, Conductivity,

ppb

<o.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

< 0.01

< 0.Ol

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<O.Ol

<0.01

<0.01

Validated?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

mg/~

8

4

3

2

2

1

4

4

1

4

<1

4

2

3

uS/cm

672

472

479

499

539

634

690

719

651

586

573

619

597

493

Temperature,

oC

6

14.8

19.8

19.8

19.2

11.5

5.8

7.0

6.5

8.9

lO.8

14.9

20.2

22.6

19.9

17.4

17.9

14.2

13.7

13.3

12.5

12.3

9.9

8.4

7.6

7.0

9.3

12.9

16.6

I6.6

16.6

16.6

16.7

23.8

23.8

24.0

19.3

15.o

13.8

12-Jul-12

14-Jun-12

16-May-12

18-Apr- 12

02-Apr-12

27-Mar-12

19-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

12-Mar-12

05-Mar-12

20-Feb-12

25-Jan- 12

12-Dec-I I

11-Nov-11

12-Oct-11

12-Oct-I 1

12-Oct-11

12-Oct-11

15-Sep-11

18-Aug-11

18-Aug- 11

29-Jul-11

22-Jun-11

19-May- 11

05-May-11

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.10

<0.01

<0.10

<0.I0

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

<1 514

1 504

2 544

2 607

3 596

3 627

6 607

11 617

< 1 644

< 1 591

2 661

2 640

2 619

3 610

1 542

1 542

1 542

1 542

1 523

3 529

11 529

3 539

5 568

4 584

10 520

Flowb,

gaUmin

600

157

125

133

465

I2OO

620

530

51o

430

400

350

183

200

250

lOO

500

830

5o0

625

475

500

700

350

525

1450

720

380

14o

140

14o

140

70

100

100

lO6

630

565

2500




Sample ID

BD 10255

BD 10245

BD10237

BD10227

BDI0217

BD 10218 (dup)

BD10213

BDI0207

BD 10202

Sampling

Date

14-Apr-ll

18-Mar-11

02-Mar-11

26-Jan-11

21-Dec-10

21-Dec-10

22-Nov-10

27-Oct-10

30-Sep-10

PCBa,

ppb

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10R

<0.10R

<0.10

<0.I0

<0.10

Data TSS, Conductivity,

Validated? mg/L uS/cm

Y 21 581

Y 17 661

Y 91 693

Y 4 785

Y 3 NR

Y 4 NR

Y 5 627

Y 4 655

Y 3 643

aSamples were analyzed to a detection limit of 0.01 parts per billion (ppb). Samples collected before 2012

were analyzed to a detection limit of 0.1 parts per billion (ppb).

bFlow estimate calculated from a set of flow velocity measurements.

R = Unusable; QA/QC data indicated significant deficiencies in the analytical data.

Temperature,

°C

12.5

9.2

7.7

4.6

6.2

6.2

14.5

18.0

21.7

Flowb,

gal/min

1200

8OO

1500

275

262

262

120

52

25




Sample ID

BDI0767

BD10768b

BD10680

BD10681b

BD10626

BD 10627~

BDI0616

BD10617

BD10609

BDI0456

BD 10457b

BD10450

BDI0451~

BD10445

BD 10446b

BDI0434

BD 10435b

BD 10430

BDI0431~

BD 10426

BD 10427b

BDI0421

BD 10422b

BD10417

BD10418~

BD10416

BD10412

BD10413b

BD10411

BD 10407

BD10408~

BD10405

BD10399

~3~)1o4oob

BD10398

BD 10392

BD 10393~

BD10385

BD10386~

continued

Sampling

Date

18-Mar-14

18-Mar-14

28-Oct-13

28-Oct-13

29-Ju1-13

29-Ju1-13

23-Apr-13

23-Apr-13

22-Apr- 13

4-Mar-13

4-Mar- 13

25-Feb-13

25-Feb-13

23-Jan-13

23-Jan- 13

12-Dec-12

12-Dec-12

16-Nov-12

16-Nov-12

10-Oct-12

10-Oct-12

12-Sep-12

12-Sep-12

15-Aug-12

15-Aug-12

24-Ju1-12

I2-Jul-12

12-Jul-12

27-Jun-12

14-Jun-12

14-Jun-12

30-May-12

16-May-12

16-May-12

04-May- 12

18-Apr- 12

18-Apr- 12

02-Apt-12

02-Apr- 12

PCBa, Data TSS, Conductivity,

ppb

0.092

0.086

0.085

0.075

0.11

0.11

0.067

0.092

0.14

0.062

0.073

0.067

0.082

0.073 J

< 0.01 J

0.03

0.03

0.047

0.046

0.032

0.027

0.040

0.031

0.097

0.086

0.061

0.058

0.051

0.024

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.081

0.094

0.033

0.046

0.064

0.045

0.055

Validated?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

mg/L

1

1

<I

1

3

3

2

2

4

2

3

2

2

1

2

2

2

-1

<1

2

2

I

1

<1

2

1

I

I

<1

2

3

I

2

2

<1

1

1

<1

<1

uS/cm

654

654

472

472

538

538

610

610

619

685

685

709

709

645

645 ~ i

570

570

569

569

614

614

569

569

497

497

486

509

509

490

509

509

522

547

547

581

850

608

594

594

Temperature,

°C

5.7

5.7

14.1

14.1

18.7

18.7

12.2

12.2

12.8

5.4

5.4

7,8

7.8

6.2

6.2

8.2

8.2

9.7

9.7

14.6

14.6

19.7

19.7

20

20

22.3

19.1

19.1

17.8

16.1

16.1

18.4

18.5

18.5

15.3

14.7

14.7

13.1

13.1

Flowe,

gagmin

600

6oo

157

157-

465

465

12oo

12oo

1475

620

620

530

530

51o

51o

430

430

400

400

350

350

200

200

2o0

200

270

250

250

16o

1oo

lOO

200

500

500

1000

850

850

500

5O0




Sample ID

BD10384

BD10379

BD10378

BD10373

BD10366

BD10367b

BD10362

BD10361

BD10354

BD10348

BDI0347

BD 10340

BD10338

BD10330

BD10325

BD10320

BD10319

BDI0314

BD10319

BD10314

BD10313

BD10309

BDI0310b

BD10307

BD10303

BDI0295

BDI0293

BDI0287

BD10284

BD10279

BD10269

BD10270b

BD10252

BD10253b

BD10248

BD10248

BD 10242

BD10243b

BD10232

continued

Sampling PCBa, Data Date ppb Validated?

30-Mar-12

27-Mar- 12

22-Mar- 12

19-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

12-Mar-12

09-Mar-12

05-Mar-12

20-Feb- 12

07-Feb- 12

25-Jan- 12

05-Jan-12

12-Dec-11

02-Dec-11

11-Nov-11

25-Oct-11

12-Oct-11

25-Oct-11

12-Oct-11

30-Sep-11

15-Sep-11

15-Sep-11

0.069

0.046

0.038

0.062

0.032

0.030

0.038

0.042

0.089

0.II

0.11

0.036

0.052

0.038

0.081

0.097

0.067

0.063

0.067

0.063

0.063

0.093

0.081

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

TSS, Conductivity,

uS/cm

<1

<1

2

I

2

2

2

3

<I

1

2

2

<1

2

3

<1

<1

<I

<I

<1

6

2

2

607

614

581

597

623

623

642

657

589

650

629

636

628

614

628

607

623

544

623

544

614

524

524

Temperature, oC

12.6

14.6

13.2

14.3

13.1

13.1

10.4

9.6

9.0

8.2

8.3

6.8

8.5

9.5

10.7

12.7

16.2

16.4

16.2

16.4

16.4

14.9

14.9

01-Sep-11

18-Aug-11

29-Jul- 11

07-Jul-11

22-Jun-I 1

03-Jun-I I

19-Ma~-I 1

05-Ma)’-I 1

05-Ma~-I 1

14-Apr-11

14-Apr-11

3 l-Mar- 11

31-Mar- 11

18-Mar- 11

18-Mar- 11

02-Mar-11

0.068

0.031

0.13

0.097

0.044

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

1

<1

2

1

4

523

526

532

535

566

0.085

0.095

<0.I0 R

<0.10 R

0.049

0.050

<0.10

<0.10

<0.I0

<0.I0

<0.10R

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

4

2

9

10

14

14

4

4

13

12

57

568

580

510

510 "

571

571

662

662

656

656

693

20.5

24.2

23.1

20.1

20.1

19.2

15.4

14.5

14.5

13.2

13.2

11.3

11.3

9.3

9.3

7.7

Flowe, gal/min

47O

625

45O

475

5OO

5OO

7O0

94O

35O

53O

97O

1550

66O

840 .

1600

38O

350 .

140

35O

140

350

57

57

55

95

85

275

59O

307

58O

2600

2600

1215

1215

326

326

800

8OO

1500




Sample ID

BDI0233b

BD 10229

BD 10223

BD 10224b

BD 10222

BD10216

BD10214

BD10210

BD10211b

BD10209

BD10204

BD 10205b

BDI0203

BD10199

BD10200b

BD10198

aSamples were anal’

Sampling Date

02-Mar-11

09-Feb-11

26-Jan-I 1

26-Jan-I I

06-Jan-11

21-Dec-10

09-Dec-10

22-Nov- 10

22-Nov-10

10-Nov-10

27-Oct-I 0

27-Oct- 10

13-Oct-10

30-Sep-10

30-Sep-10

14-Sep-10

PCBa, Data

ppb Validated?

0.14 Y

<0.10 R Y

<0.10R Y

<0.10R Y

<0.10R Y

<0.10R Y

0.11 J Y

0.31K Y

0.26 K Y

< 0.37 K Y

< 0.55 K Y

< 0.55 K Y

0.16K Y

0.30 K Y

0.28 K Y

0.55 K Y

~ed to a detection limit of 0.01 parts per billion (ppb).

TSS, Conductivity, mg/L uS/cm

58 693

3 924

2 768

2 768

4 780

2 793

5 677

5 621

4 621

2 601

2 651

2 651

7 625

6 641

7 641

21 650

Samples collected before 2012

were analyzed to a detection limit of 0.1 parts per billion (ppb).

~Duplicate sample.

CFlow estimate calculated fyom a set of flow velocity measurements.

NR = Not reported.

J = Estimated value. The QA/QC data indicated an analytical bias.

K = Estimated value due to QA blank contamination

R = Unusable; QA/QC data indicated significant deficiencies in the analytical data.

Temperature,

OC

7.7

4.1

4.6

4.6

5.9

6.0

7.5

14.9

14.9

8.8

16.8

16.8

18.6

17.5

17.5

20.1

Flowe,

gal/min

1500

475

290

290

605

224

270

110

110

72

46

46

19

17

17

21


Mound Spring


Sample ID

NA

BD10760

NA

BDI0615

BD10602a

NA

NA

BD 10440

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD10343

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD 10272

BDI0263

BD10261

BD10257

BD 10250

NA

BD 10240

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

PCBa,

Sampling Date ppb

18-Mar-14 -

27-Dec-13 0.51

29-Ju1-13 -

22-Apr- 13 0.57

19-Apr- 13 0.43

04-Mar- 13 -

25-Feb- 13 -

14-Jan- 13 0.66

12-Dec-12 -

16-Nov-12 -

10-Oct-12 -

12-Sep-12 -

15-Aug-I 2 -

07-Jul-12 -

15-Mar-12 -

20-Feb- 12 -

25-Jan-12 0.35

12-Dec-11 -

17-Nov-11 -

12-Oct-I 1 -

15-Sep-I I -

18-Aug-I I -

29-Jul-11 -

22-Jun-11 -

05-May-I 1 0.72

25-Apr-I 1 0.99

20-Apr-11 0.82

14-Apr-11 0.53

12-Apr-I I 0.56

18-Mar- 11 -

07-Mar-11 .0.58

02-Mar-11 -

26-Jan-I 1 -

21-Dec-10 -

22-Nov- l 0 -

27-Oct-10 -

30-Sep-10 -

Data TSS,

Validated? mg!L

Y 1

Y <1

Y 3

Y 1

Y <1

Y <1

Y <1

Y I

Y <1

Y 1

Y 2

~arts per billion (ppb).

Conductivity, uS/cm

470

521

717

496

630

471

457

505

511

518

520

Samples were analyzed to a detection limit of 0.1

~Flow estimated using V-notch weir, unless otherwise noted.

¢Flow estimated visually.

dSample collected post-storm, since Mound Sp. now flows only in ephemeral, very wet conditions.

NR = Not reported.

Temperature,

oC

9.9

14.7

8.7

8.6

6.5

12.7

" 10.9

9.9

16.2

9.8

8.9

Flowb,

gal/min

0.4

DRY

1

3

DRY

DRY

6.8

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

0.25

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

13,4

29

18

0.4

12

DRY

2e

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY


Rusty Spring Bennett’s Dump, Bloomington, Indiana

Sample ID

BD10773

NA

NA

NA

BD10461

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD10~9

BD 10~ $2

BD10~46

BD10~6

BD 10~28

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BDI0291

BD 10274

NA

NA

BD10241

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sampling Date

18-Mar-14

28-Oct-13

29-Ju1-13

22-Apr-13

04-Mar-I 3

25-Feb-I 3

23 -Jan- 13

12-Dec-12

16-Nov-12

10-Oct-12

12-Sep-12

15-Aug-12

07-Jul-12

05-Mar-12

20-Feb-12

25-Jan-12

12-Dec-11

06-Dec-11

12-Oct-I 1

12-Oct-I 1

15-Sep-I 1

18-Aug-11

29-Jul-11

22-Jun-I 1

05-May-I I

14-Apr-I 1

18-Mar-11

07-Mar- 11

02-Mar-11

26-Jan-11

21-Dec-10

22-Nov- 10

27-Oct- 10

30-Sep-10

PCBa,

ppb

2.9

4.2

4.5

3.3

3.8

4.0

4.6

6.2

3.5

3.5

Data

Validated?

¥

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

TSS, mg/L

160

6

10

<1

2

1

2

Conductivity,

uS/cm

567

692

672

672

710

756

778

623

538

628

Temperature,

oC

6,8

9.5

8.6

8.6

9.1

12.0

11.4

16.0

11.6

7.9

Flowb,

gal!min

0.4

DRY

DRY

DRY

0.1

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

0.5

0.3

1.5

1.5

2.5

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

1.5

7

DRY

DRY

3

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

Samples were analyzed to a detection limit of 0.1 parts per billion (ppb).

bFlow estimated visually.

J = Estimated value. The QA/QC data indicated an analytical bias.


Middle Spring


Sample ID

BI)10771

BD 10731

BD 10629

BD10624

BD10614

BD10460

BD10454

BD10449

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD10382

BD10376

BD10370

BD10364

BD10360

BD10356

BD10357 (dup)

BD10350

BD10351 (dup)

BD10344

BD10345 (dup)

BDI0333

BD10334 (dup)

BD10327

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD10288

BD10289 (dup)

BD10281

BD10282 (dup)

BD 10273

BD10258

continued

Sampling Date

18-Mar-14

8-Nov- 13

29-Jul- 13

23-Apt-13

22-Apr-13

4-Mar-13

25-Feb- 13

23 -Jan- 13

12-Dec-12

16-Nov-12

10-Oct-12

12-Sep-12

15-Aug-12

07-JuM2

27-Mar-12

19-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

12-Mar- 12

06-Mar-12

05-Mar- 12

05-Mar- 12

20-Feb- 12

20-Feb- 12

25-Jan-12

25-Jan-12

, 12-Dec-11

12-Dec- 11

06-Dec-I 1

17-Nov-11

12-Oct-11

15-Sep-11

18-Aug-11

29-Jul-11

22-Jun-11

22-Jun-I 1

19-May-I 1

19-May-I 1

05-May-11

14-Apr-11

PCBa,

ppb

4.3

2.0

5.4

4.6

4.3

4.6

4.6

5.8

3.0

3.5

3.8

4.6

3.6

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.4

4.8

4.7

6.4

6.6

7.7

4.8

4.6

4.5

4.8

4.8

4.4

Data

Validated?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

y .

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

TSS,

mg/L

1

<1

<1

1

<1

<1

<1

5

2

1

1

2

<1

1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

1

<1

Conductivity,

uS/cm

474

570

515

534

533

585

560

595

563

573

569

564

576

579

579

577

577

584

584

594

594

618

515

515

470

470

405

486

Temperature,

deg C

~ 8.1

lO.2

15.1

10.5

11

9.3

10.0

10.3

14.3

18.8

16.3

13.4

10.2

10.6

10.6

10.I

10.I

10.8

10:8

12.2

12.2

12.7

15.3

15.3

13.2

13.2

13.7

11.6

Flowb,

gal/min

3.4

0.l

5

8.3

9

6.4

2.3

4

DRY

DRY

DRy

DRY

DRY

DRY

0.1

NR

0.3

16

0.1

1.9

1.9

4

4

10.5

10.5

6

6

12

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

4

4

4

4

16

12


Middle Spring


Sample ID

BDI0247

BD10235

BD10226

BD 10221

NA

NA

NA

NA

Samples were anal’

bFlow estimated usin

Sampling Date

18-Mar- 11

02-Mar- 11

26-Jan-I 1

28-Dec- 10

21 -Dec- 10

22-Nov-10

27-Oct-10

30-Sep-10

PCBa, Data

ppb Validated?

6.0 Y

9.1 Y

9.2 Y

8.1 Y

,zed to a detection limit of 0.1 parts per billion (ppb.

V-notch weir, unless otherwise noted.

TSS, mg/L

<1

<I

<1

<1

Conductivity,

uS/cm

506

542

583

NR

Temperature,

deg C

10.5

9.4

9.6

Flowb,

gal/min

8.3

10.5

2.3

0.5

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY


Mid-North Spring


Sample ID

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD10275

BD10266

BDI0265

BDI0262

BD10259

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sampling Date

18-Mar-14

28-Oct-13

29-Ju1-13

23-Apr-13

4-Mar-13

25-Feb-13

23-Jan-13

12-Dec-12

16-Nov-12

10-Oct-12

12-Sep-12

15 -Aug- 12

07-Jul-12

15-Mar-12

20-Feb-12

25-Jan-12

12-Dec- 11

17-Nov- 11

12-Oct-11

15-Sep-i i

18-Aug- 11

29-Jul-11

22-Jun-11

05-May-11

03-May-I 1

27-Apr- 11

25 -Apr- 11

20-Apt- 1 l

18-Mar- 11

02-Mar- 11

26-Jan-11

21-Dec-10

22-Nov-10

27-Oct- 10

30-Sep-10

PCBa,

ppb

0.45

0.41

0.25

0.38

0.21

Data TSS, mgn

8

1

2

"4

3

Conductivity, Temperature,

°C

15.4

14.8

14.9

13.8

10.9

Validated?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

uS/cm

273

297

277

284

341


bFlow estimated using V-notch weir.

CFIow estimated visually.

Flow,

gal/min

I)RY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY¢

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

3.5b

2~

4.5b

0.2b

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY


North Spring


Sample ID

NA

NA

NA

BD 10601

BDI0493

BD 10455

BD10441

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD10339

NA

BD10326

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BD 10276

BD 10264

BD 10260

BD10251

BD 10249

NA

BD10239

NA

BDI0231

BD 10230

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sampling Date

18-Mar-14

28-Oct-13

29-Jul- l 3

19-Apr-13

18-Mar-13

27-Feb-l 3

14-Jan-13

I2-Dec-12

16-Nov-12

10-Oct-12

12-Sep-12

15-Aug-12

07-Jul-12

15-Mar-12

20-Feb-12

19-Jan-12

12-Dec-1 I

06-Dec-11

17-Nov-11

12-Oct-11

15-Sep-11

18-Aug-I 1

29-Jul-11

22-Jun-11

05-May-I I

25-Apr-I 1

20-Apr-I 1

12-Apr- 11

05-Apr-I 1

18-Mar-11

07-Mar- 11

02-Mar-11

28-Feb-11

22-Feb-11

26-Jan-11

21-Dec-10

22-Nov- 10

27-Oct- 10

30-Sep-I0

PCBa,

ppb

4

6.5

6.1

4.9

4.8

5.5

4.0

5.2

5.7

5.6

4.9

6.9

6.0

6.1

Data

Validated?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y



TSS,

mg/L

8

13

8

2

3

8

7

4

7

5

13

4

7

2

Conductivity,

uS/cm

507

522

559

595

583

614

442

43l

422

447

458

452

482

475

Temperature,

oC

9.8

7.7

7.8

8.9

9.9

11.8

11.3

11.0

10.5

lO.1

9.4

8.6

8.7

7.5

Flowb,

gal/min

DRY

DRY

DRY

6

3

3

3

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

1

DRY

3

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

2

8

8

4

1.5

DRY

5

DRY

2

2

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

DRY

Table 10. Flow and Water Level Monitoring GWIP Stations

Bennett’s Dump Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana

Monitoring Station Parameter Instrumentation

V-notch weir and Crest Gauge Middle Spring Water level/flow

Level logging transducer

Mid-North Spring Water level/flow V-notch weir and Crest Gauge

Mound Spring Water level/flow

North Spring Flow

Stout’s Creek Flow

Downstream

Stout’s Creek Upstream Flow

V-notch weir and Crest Gauge

Level logging transducer

None

Flow velocity meter

Flow velocity meter

Quarry Drain Outlet Flow Weir or Flow Velocity Meter

Icebox, Wedge & Wedge South Quarries

Water Level Staff gauge

Pit A (surrogate for Test Pits 1-4)

Monitor Wells & piezometers

(see Table 1)

Water Level

Water Level

Depth-to-water meter

Depth-to-water meter

Table 11. Flow Observations

On-Site Springs


Observation Date

3/31/2014

3/18/2014

2/21/2014

1/30/2014

12/27/2013

12/23/2013

12/16/2013

11/8/2013

11/5/2013

10/28/2013

9/23/2013

9/3/2013

8/23/2013

8/15/2013

7/29/2013

6/28/2013

5/22/2013

4/22/2013

4/15/2013

4/8/2013

3/26/2013

3/19/2013

3/18/2013

3/12/2013

3/4/2013

2/27/2013

2/25/2013

1/30/2013

1/23/2013

1/14/2013

1/11/2013

12/12/2012

11/16/2012

10/10/2012

9/28/2012

9/14/2012

9/7/2012

8/15/2012

7/24/2012

continued

Mound

Spring a

0

0

0

0

0.4

31.7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5.6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Middle

Spring a

3.4

3.4

10.5

3.4

10

18.4

0.8

0.1

0

0

0

0

0

0

5.5

5.5

4.8

9.4

1.5

0.3

1.9

3.7

4.0

0.8

6.4

7.3

2.3

7.3

4

13.1

7.3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mid-North Spring a

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

North

Spring

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.1

0

0

0

1.5

3

0

0

3

o

0.5

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Rusty b

Spring

0.4

Nil

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NR

NR

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.1

0

0

NR

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


On-Site Springs


Observation Date

7/12/2012

7/10/2012

6/27/2012

6/14/2012

5/30/2012

5 / 17/2012

5/4/2012

4/18/2012

4/2/2012 c

3/27/2012 c

3/19/2012 c

3/15/2012 ~

3/5/2012

2/29/2012

2/20/2012

2/10/2012

2/7/2012

1/25/2012

1/18/2012

1/12/2012

12/30/2011

12/19/2011

12/12/2011

12/5/2011

12/2/2011

11/30/2012

11/23/2011

11/17/2011

11/15/2011

11/14/2011

1 I/4/2011

10/22/2011

10/12/2011

10~4/2011

9/30/2011

9/30/2011

9/26/2011

9/15/2011

9/8/2011

continued

Mound Middle Mid-North North

Spring a Spring a Spring a Spring b

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o

o

.o

o

o

0

o

0

0.3

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o.o

o.o

0.7

4.8

2.8

2.8

0.0

0.12

o.15

0.3

1.9

2.8

4.0

6.4

8.3

10.5

9.4

4

6.4

6.4

6

11.8

5.5

lO.5

1.9

0

o

o

0

o

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

0

0

o

0

0

o

o

0

0

o

0

0

0

0

0

o

o

0

0

0

0

o

o

0

o

0

o

o

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

o

0

0

0

o

0

o

o

0

o

0

0

o

5

0

0

0

0

3

o

1

o

o

o

0

o

0

o

0

0

0

0

0

0

Rusty

Spring b

0

0

0

0

0.25

1.25

1

0.5

0

0

0

0.05

0.5

0.5

0.3

1

1

1.5

1

0.1

0.25

1.5

2.5

0.5

2.5

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


On-Site Springs


Observation

Date

9/1/2011

8/26/2011

8/18/2011

8/9/2011

8/5/2011

7/29/2011

7/15/2011

7/7/2011 "

7/1/2011

6/24/2011

6/22/2011

6/16/2011

6/14/2011

6/3/2011

5/28/2011

5/19/2011

5/6/2011

5/5/2011

4/25/2011

4/20/2011

4/14/2011

4/i2/2011

4/5/2011

3/31/2011

3/25/2011

3/I 8/2011

3/I 1/2011

3/7/2011

3/2/2011

2/28/2011

2/22/2011

2/18/2011

2/9/2011

2/4/2011

1/26/2011

1/21/2011

1/4/2011

12/28/2010

12/23/2010

continued

Mound

Spring a

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6.8

13.4

28

32

0.4

11.5

0

0

0

0

2

2

0

0

.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Middle Spring a

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1.9

1.5

3.4

4

3.4

1.9

3.4

6

7.3

13.1

16

18

16

11.8

14.5

8.3

6.4

7.3

8.3

12

lO.5

14.5

12

1.9

2.3

3.4

3.4

0.5

0.4

Mid-North Spring a

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3.5

¯ 3.5

4.5

0.2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

North

Spring b

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

2

8

0

4

1.5

0

0

0

0

5

0

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Rusty

Spring b

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.1

0.5

1.5

1

0

0

0

1.5

NR

7

0

NR

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Table 11. Flow Observations On-Site Springs


Observation Mound Middle Mid-North North Rusty

Date spring a Spring a Spring a Spring b Spring b

12/21/2010 0 0 0 0 0

12/9/2010 0 0 0 0 NR

11/30/2010 0 0 0 0 0

11/22/2010 0 0 0 0 0

11/12/2010 0 0 0 0 NR

10/27/2010 0 0 0 0 0

10/15/2010 0 0 0 0 NR

9/30/2010 0 0 0 0 0

9/15/2010 0 0 0 0 NR

aFlow estimated using V-notch weir.


Pump test in progress.

NR - Not Recorded

FIGURES

V-notch Weir

MW-3

I~ 24" Corrugated Plastic ’Drain Pil~.

Surface Water

Stout’s Creek Up Strum Sample Location

PZ-F4 GP-3 GP-11

P~-Itl

Inffitretion Gellery

C~ntrol Point

BD383

3101113.17 3100947.82 3100498.00

3100847.59 3101022.15 3100682.89 3101020.78

1436411.88 143560~34 1436414.92 1435678.11 1435455.55 143634~42

~ 18. am4

stature

,RY A

Intermittent Overflow Discharge from Quarter

Mile Quarry Complex

QuarTY Drain \Ouffall

Quarry Drain Weir Plate

I~ 11/18/14 - 0~.17pm T~ t~t0Ofl

/

[] Survey Control Point

~i~:. Piezometer Location

//~ Stream Gauging and

Sampling Point

~ Staff Gauge

(~ Springs

Test Pit Potentiometric Surface Contour on March 18, 2014

CBS Corporation

CONTINUOUS MONITORING PLOTS

25

20

Middle Spring Continuous Flow and Mound Spring Flow Observations

January 2014

5

I

1-Jan 6-Jan 11-Jan 16-Jan 21 -Jan 26-Jan 31 -Jan

2014

5.0

4.0

0.0

Middle Spring Flow ¯ Middle Sp obs. ¯ Rain Events [] Mound Sp obs. --Cumulative Rain

25

20


February 2014

5

0 1-Feb 21 -Feb 6-Feb 11-Feb 16-Feb 26-Feb

2014

5.0

4.0

3.0 .__.

1.0

0.0

Middle Spring Flow ¯ Middle Sp obs. ¯ Rain Events [] Mound Sp obs. Cumulative Rain

25

2O

0 1-Mar


March 2014

6-Mar 11-Mar 16-Mar 21 -Mar 26-Mar 31 -Mar

2014

5.0

4.0

3.0 ~~

1.0

0.0

Middle Spring Flow ¯ Middle Sp obs ¯ Rain Events n Mound Sp obs --Cumulative Rain

MANUAL MONITORING PLOTS

L_

o o o 00 ~ ~

(wriSt) ~o1:1

o o

(saq:~u!) u!e~! a^p, elnLun3 AIq~,uolN

I

(rude) ~o1:1

f::: .--.

(:U) uo!~,eAal3

APPENDIX A

Chain-of-Custody Records

01102348

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1(

1:

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY / Analytical Request Document 7he Chain-of-Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT~ ,NJ relevant fields must be completed accurately.

project Name:

P~oJect Numbec

^i Section D Matrix Codes A _

~1 COLLECTED Requk~dC]ient In/omla~on MATRIX / CODE

Odnking Water OW Water W’F ]~ 0 I Waste WaterPmduc,

W~N Soil/Send SL

eL SAMPLE ID

Sample IDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tlssue TS 0

~ ~ DATE "r Z Z = 0 = Pace Project No./Lab I.D.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ACCEPTED BY I AFFIUATION SAMPLE CONDITIONS

SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE

DATE Signed

F-ALL-Q-020rev,07, 15-May-2007

APPENDIX B

Certificates of Analysis

/_....~ace AnalyticaF

Service Location

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 7901 W. MORRIS ST. INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46231 (317)243-8304

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Received

19-MAR-14

Oompleted

26-MAR-14

Printed

27-MAR-14

Lab ID

AA11749

PO Number

BL-0396

Sampled

18-MAR-14 10:00

Report To

RUSS CEPKO CBS CORP - NATIONAL CITY CENTER 20 STANWIX STREET 10TH FLOOR PITTSBURG, PA 15222-1384

CLIENT ID: BD10767

MATRIX TYPE: NON-SPECIFIC WATER SUBMITTER: 2226 - CBS CORPORATION DATA PACKAGE #: 66021

MATRIX: WT

LOCATION: BENNETT’S DUMP

Bill To

BETH STEIGERWALD CBS CORPORATION 20 STANWIX STREET 10TH FLOOR PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Sample Description

Parameter Result Det. Limit Units

INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME 2000 mL

_ EINALvoLuME :::: : :


PCB AROCLOR 1016 BDL 0.01 ug/L

,PcB ARocLon1221 ’ ’ : PCB AROCLOR 1232 0.092 0.01 ug/L

PCB AROCLOR 1242 : BDL ’~ ...... ’ . 0.01 ug/L =’


=PCBAROCLOR1254 : ’ ’ ..... I " ] ’:’ " .... BDL , ¯ 0.01, ug!L :: ’: .


SUMMATION OF AROCLORS : : :

Aroclor pattern is degraded

Page 1 of 2

~ace Analytical °

Sample lD: AAl1749 BD10767

TOTAL sUSPENDED sOLIDS DRIED AT 103~105 DEGREES CSM2540 O 19TH ED i. " : NELAC:Y


SUSPENDED SOLIDS I1 I 1 I mg/L

Sample Comments

BDL Below Detection Limit

Sample was received on ice at temperature 2.8 C. Sample chain of custody number 1771728.

This Certificate shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the lab. The sample results relate only to the analytes of interest tested or to the sample as received by the lab. Pace Analytical Services, INC. certifies that the test results indicated as NELAP (National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program) accredited (Yes for NELAP) meet all requirements of NELAP and Kansas (KDHE) unless otherwise explained or justified as to the the exact nature of the deviations. KS ELAP / NELAP Accreditation # E-10177 Indiana SDWA C-49-01

Approved by: CHRISTOPHER BOYLE 25-MAR-14

Page 2 of 2

~ace Analytical

Pace Analytica! Services,

Service Location



19-MAR-14

Lab ID

AA1175O

Report To

RUSS CEPKO CBS CORP - NATIONAL CITY CENTER

20 STANWIX STREET

10TH FLOOR PITTSBURG, PA 15222-1384

CLIENT ID: BD10768 MATRIX TYPE: NON-SPECIFIC WATER

SUBMITTER: 2226 - CBS CORPORATION DATA PACKAGE #: 66021 MATRIX: WT


26-MAR-14

Printed

27-MAR-14

Bill To

BETH STEIGERWALD

CBS CORPORATION

Completed PO Number

BL-0396

Sampled

18-MAR-14 10:00

20 STANWlX STREET 10TH FLOOR PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Sample Description

PCB SEPARATORY FUNNEL LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION SW846-3510C i :

. ~nalyst:.CiHIPSKiND ~ ii i i : ~ A~’~iysis Datei21’MAR~i4 ~ instrUme~i PREP’ ~::

Parameter Result Det. Limit

INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME 2000

FINAL VOLUME 1

~ PCB AROCLORS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/ECD SW846;8082A ......... ¯

:Test: P230.11o

Units

rnL

rnL

NELAC:Y

Analyst: C:::HIPSKIND : , ; : ....... Analysfs Date:21-MAR,14 1:6:20 . Instrument: GC/ECD ; Test: O301,7.0,

: Prep: POB SEPARAToRY FUnnEL. LIQUID:LIQ0iD:EXTRA~i0~:S~846:3516~ P230.ii~ :

Parameter

PCB AROCLOR 1016

PCB AROCLOR 1221

PCB AROCLOR 1232

PCB AROCLOR 1242

PCB AROCLOR 1248

PCB AROCLOR 1254

PCB AROCLOR 1260

PCB AROCLOR 1262

SURROGATE RECOVERY

DECACHLOROBIPHENYL(DCB)

SUMMATION OF AROCLORS

Result

BDL

BDL

0.086

BDL

BDL

BDL

52.0

Det. Limit

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

Units

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

% Rec

0.086 0.01 ug/L


Page 1 of 2

~ace Analytical~

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.


TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS DRIED AT 103’105. DEGREES C SM2540 DI:i9TH ED ’~’ i NE[_AC:Y :


SUSPENDED SOLIDS I1 I 1 I mg/L

Sample Comments





Page 2 of 2

~ace AnalyticaF Pace Analytical Services, Inc.

Service Location



19-MAR-14

Completed

26-MAR-14

Printed

27-MAR-14

Lab ID

AA11751

PO Number

BL-0396

Sampled

18-MAR-14 10:15

Report To

RUSS CEPKO CBS CORP - NATIONAL CITY CENTER 20 STANWlX STREET 10TH FLOOR PITTSBURG, PA 15222-1384

CLIENT ID: BD10769

MATRIX TYPE: NON-SPECIFIC WATER SUBMITTER: 2226 - CBS CORPORATION

DATA PACKAGE #: 66021

MATRIX: WT


Bill To

BETH STEIGERWALD CBS CORPORATION 20 STANWlX STREET 10TH FLOOR PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Sample Description

Parameter

1Result i Det. Limit Urn~i~s ,,

INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME 2000 mL

FINAL VOLUME ~ i i~: ’ .....

Parameter

PCB AROCLOR 1016

PCB AROCLOR 1221’

PCB AROCLOR 1232

PCB AROCLOR 1242

PCB AROCLOR 1248

PCB AROCLOR 1254

PCB AROCLOR 1260

,PCB AROCLOR 1262

SURROGATE .:RECOVERY

DECACHLOROBIPHENYL; (DCB)


Result

BDL

BDL :: :: : ::

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

66.0

BDL

Det. Limit

0.01

’ : O~Ol

0.01

0.01

Units

ug/L

ug/L’

ug~L ug/E

0.01 ug/L

0.01 ug/_L

0.01 ug~L

% Rec

0.01 ug/L.

Page 1 of 2

~ace Analytical °

Sample ID: AAl1751 BD10769

TOTAL SUSPENDEDISOLIDS IDRIED AT103.4 05 ~DEGR EE~ ~i SM2540 D 19THED ’ ~ :: :~’ i: NELAC:Y i

Parameter Result Det. Umit Units

SUSPENDED SOLIDS

Sample Comments




Approved by: CHRISTOPHER BOYLE 25~MAR-14

Page 2 of 2

~ace Analytical Pace Analytlc~l Services, Inc.

Service Location



19-MAR-14

Completed

26-MAR-14

Printed

27-MAR-14

Lab ID

AA11752

PO Number

BL-0396

Sampled

18-MAR-14 10:20

Report To

RUSS CEPKO

CBS CORP - NATIONAL CITY CENTER 20 STANWlX STREET

10TH FLOOR

PITTSBURG, PA 15222-1384

CLIENT ID: BD10770


DATA PACKAGE #: 66021

MATRIX: BD


Bill To

BETH STEIGERWALD CBS CORPORATION 20 STANWlX STREET 10TH FLOOR

PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Sample Description

Parameter

FINAL VOLUME

Units

m L

mk

Parameter

PCB AROCLOR 1016

PCB AROCLOR 1221

PCB AROCLOR 1232

PCB AROCLOR 1242

PCB AROCLOR 1248

PCB AROCLOR 1254

PCB AROCLOR 1260

PCB AROCLOR 1262

SURROGATERECOVER¥:

Result

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

62.0

BDL

Det. Limit

DECAGHLOROBIPHENYL (DCB)


Units

0.10 ug/L

0.10 :ug/L

0.10 ug/L

0.10 Ug/L

0.10 ug/L

0,10: ugiL

0.10 ug/L

0.10 ug/L

% Rec

0.10 ug/L

Page 1 of 2

, . ~ace Analytical~


TOTAL: SUSPENDED SOLIDS DRIED AT 103’105 DEGREESiC SM2540 D 19~HED . :i, ~::, i~;~:, N ELAC:¥1 ~

Parameter Result Det. Limit Units / SUSPENDED SOLIDS L BDL [ 1 ~ rng/L /

Sample Comments





Page 2 of 2

~ace Analytical°

Service Location



19-MAR-14

Completed

26-MAR-14

Printed

27-MAR-14

Lab ID

AA11753

PO Number

BL-0396

Sampled

18-MAR-14 10:25

Report To

RUSS CEPKO


10TH FLOOR


CLIENT ID: BD10771


DATA PACKAGE #: 66021 MATRIX: BD


Bill To


Sample Description

Parameter

INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME

FINAL VOLUME

1000 mL

5

Prepi PCBSEPARATORY :FUN:NEE LiQUID~LIQUi6 ExTRACTIoN Sw846-35i00 P230!.110 : ::: ’:.: i i: .::: : :::::::

Parameter

PCB AROCLOR 1016

PCB AROCLOR 1221

PCB AROCLOR 1232

PCB AROCLOR :1242

PCB AROCLOR 1248

PCB AROCLOR 1254

PCB AROCLOR 1260

PCB ARO(~LOR 1262

SURROGATE RECOVERY

DECACHLOROBIPHENYL (DCB)


Result

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

4.3

’BDL

BDL

BDL

94.0

4.3

Det. Limit Units

0.10 ug/L

0.10 ug/L

0.10 ug/L

0.10 Ug/L

0.10 ug/L

~0.10~ :ug/L.

0.10 ug/L

0.10 ug/L

% Rec

0..10 uglL

Aroclor 1248 is degraded.

Page 1 of 2

~ace AnalyticaF


TOTAL SUSPENDED SOI3DS DRIED AT


SUSPENDED SOLIDS

Sample Comments

AMENDED REPORT - CBB - 27-MAR-14 : summation amended





Page 2 of 2

~ace Analytical~

Service Location



19-MAR-14

Completed

26-MAR-14

Printed

27-MAR-14

Lab ID

AA11754

PO Number

BL-0396

Sampled

18-MAR-14 10:45

Report To

RUSS CEPKO CBS CORP - NATIONAL CITY CENTER 20 STANWlX STREET 10TH FLOOR PITTSBURG, PA 15222-1384

Bill To


Sample Description

CLIENT ID: BD10772


DATA PACKAGE #: 66021 MATRIX: BD


Parameter


FINAL VOLUME

Result

1000

5

Det. Limit Units

mL

mL

Prep: PCB SEPARATORY FUNNEL LIQUiD:LIQUi:~ ~XTRACTIoN sW8~4643510C P230H io ,::-::: .... ::::i

Parameter

PCB AROCLOR 1016

PCB AROCLOR 1221

PCB AROCLOR 1232

PCB AROCLOR 1242

PCB AROCLOR 1248

’PCB AROCLOR 1254

PCB AROCLOR 1260

PCB AROCLOR 1262

SURROGATE RECOVERY

DECACHLOROBIPHENYL (DCB)


Result

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

84.0

BDL

Det. Limit Units

0.10 ug/L

0.10 :ug/k

0.10 ug/L

0.10 ug!L

0.10 ug/L

o.io ugiL 0.10 ug/L

0.10 ug/L

% Rec

0.10 ug/L

Page 1 of 2

~ace AnalyticaF

Parameter Result

SUSPENDED SOLIDS - BDL

Sample Comments


: ~e~t:: G40318i0:

Det. Limit Units I

I i I mglL I





Page 2 of 2

~ace Analytical

Pace Analytical

Service Location

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 7901 W. MORRIS ST.

INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46231

(317)243-8304


19-MAR-14

Completed

26-MAR-14

Printed

27-MAR-14

Lab ID

AA11755

PO Number

BL-0396

Sampled

18-MAR-14 10:30

Report To

RUSS CEPKO


10TH FLOOR


Bill To

BETH STEIGERWALD CBS CORPORATION 20 STANWlX STREET 10TH FLOOR

PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Sample Description

CLIENT ID: BD10773


DATA PACKAGE #: 66021 MATRIX: BD,


Parameter


FINAL VOLUME

Result

1000

5

Det. Limit Units

Parameter

PCB AROCLOR 1016

PCB AROCLOR 1221

PCB AROCLOR 1232

PCB AROCLOR 1242 ’

PCB AROCLOR 1248

PCB AROCLOR t 254 ....

PCB AROCLOR 1260

PCB AROCLOR 1262

SURROGATE RECOV:ERY, .....

DECACHLOROBIPH ENYL (DCB)

SUMMATION OF AROCLORS ...... :


Result

BDL

BDL

2.9

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

92.0

2.9

Det. Limit Units

0.10. ug/L

.0.10: U~/L .....

0.10 ug/L

0.10 uglL

0.10 ug/L

0.10 ug/L 0.10 ug/L

’% Rec

0:i:0i’ug/L :

Page 1 of 2

,~ace Analytical ° Pace Analytical Services, Inc.


Parameter Result Det. Limit Units I

SUSPENDED SOLIDS ~ 2 t 1 ~ mg/L J

Sample Comments





Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX C

Data Validation

Validation Results March 18, 2014

Bennett’s Dump SDG #66021

Groundwater Monitoring Samples

1. Validation of the following samples has been completed:

BD10767 to BD10773

Validation was performed per the requirements forlevel 4 data in the project QAPjP. This includes a check for; Holding Time, Calibration, Blank Contamination, Precision, Accuracy, and Accuracy of Nominal Reporting Limits against method requirements.

Based on this review no data qualifications are recommended.

The QAPjP requires an assessment of the overall data quality with respect to Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness and Comparability (PARCC).

o Precision and accuracy: Precision and accuracy were accessed by reviewing the lab performance on lab spiked samples, lab spike duplicates and field duplicates. All requirements were met.

o Representativeness: The representativeness requirement involves an assessment of the field sampling and lab analytical techniques. The field sampling locations and techniques as well as lab procedures were in accordance with the approved sampling plan and QAPjP. Therefore the representativeness requirements were met.

o Completeness: The completeness goal for the project was for all project data to be 90% accepted. Completeness is calculated by dividing the total number of acceptable analyses by the total performed. An acceptable analysis is defined as one that conformed to QC protocols and is not rejected. All these analyses were accepted. The project completeness goal has been met to date.

O Comparability: All the samples taken, analyzed and validated by CBS were ¯ taken by CBS or it’s contractors sampling crews using the same procedures as previous samples at this location. These samples were analyzed by Heritage Labs. Care should be taken when attempting to trend Heritage sample results with other labs using slightly different procedures. Overall these results should be directly comparable to other Heritage lab results from these locations.

Overall, the main objective of the sampling event was to determine if PCBs are present at a concentration of. 1 ppb or more (!).0] ppb for Stout’s Creek ])ownstream, SCD and Upstream, SCIJ-).. This data is of sufficient quality to satisfy this goal.

O:~LEA~EnvironmentalkBloomington\SHAREDIRkBP validation~reports\validation report -BD Mar 18, 2014.doc 9/2/14

APPENDIX D

Instrument Maintenance Log

Bennett’s Dump InStrument Maintenance Log First Quarter 2014

Office Rain Gauge: Instrument

HOBO

#9928483

Mound Sp.: Instrument

Crest gauge

Middle Spring: Instrument

In-Situ LevelTROLL #303381

Crest gauge

Date

1/1/2014 to

3/31/2014

1/1/2014 to 3/31/2014

2/18/2014 2/21/2014 3/26/2014

1/13/2014 2/4/2014 2/18/2014 3/5/2014 3/19/2014

2/18/2014 2/21/2014 3/26/2014

Action

Normal function.

Not instrumented, Manually observed due to infrequent and short-duration flow.

0.33 feet 0.32 feet 0 feet

No re-indexing needed. Re-indexed by 0.001 ft. Re-indexed by 0.019 ft. Re-indexed by 0.003 ft. Re-indexed by 0.004 ft.

0.33 feet 0.21 feet 0.165 feet

cbs corporation - first quarter 2014 groundwater ... · re-" first quarter 2014...

Documents