catalytic leader 2012

50
Problem Solving Negotiation for the Catalytic Leader Chinook Institute 2012 David Landis

Post on 21-Oct-2014

644 views

Category:

Business


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Catalytic leader 2012

Problem Solving Negotiation for the Catalytic Leader

Chinook Institute 2012

David Landis

Page 2: Catalytic leader 2012

Definition

A negotiation is a trade

- “I’ll do Y, if you’ll do X.”

Page 3: Catalytic leader 2012

“Stimulating a productive group process requires a strong set of

negotiation skills...”

- Jeff Luke

“Catalytic Leadership”

Page 4: Catalytic leader 2012

Two Strategy Options

• Seeking Advantage

• Seeking Joint Gain

Page 5: Catalytic leader 2012

Advantage Seeking

• Good short term results

• Hard to exploit

• Relatively easy to do

Page 6: Catalytic leader 2012

Advantage Seeking

• Hard on relationships

• Misses joint gain

• Breeds reciprocity

Page 7: Catalytic leader 2012

Joint Gain Seeking

• Expands the pie

• Benefits grow over time

• Builds relationships

Page 8: Catalytic leader 2012

Joint Gain Seeking

• Risks exploitation

• Takes more time and preparation

• Requires skill to be effective

Page 9: Catalytic leader 2012

Taming the Advantage Seeker

• Align your incentives

• Cooperation on terms is reciprocal, not individual

• Lift the horizon

• Develop “walk away” alternative

Page 10: Catalytic leader 2012

Trust

“Trust is a fundamental ingredient in public leadership.”

“Facilitation and negotiation of agreements are especially hard

to forge when distrust prevails.”

- Jeff Luke

“Catalytic Leadership”

Page 11: Catalytic leader 2012

Being Trustworthy

• Say what you mean, mean what you say

• Does not require full disclosure

• Worth its weight in gold

Page 12: Catalytic leader 2012

Trusting

• Operate independent of trust

• Reciprocal consequences

Page 13: Catalytic leader 2012

3 Characteristics of Negotiation

• Asymmetrical informationAsymmetrical information

• TensionTension

• Recurring DynamicsRecurring Dynamics

Page 14: Catalytic leader 2012

Recurring Pattern

• Preparation/Aspiration

• Introduction

• Information exchange

• Offer

• Counters

• Stalemate/Settlement

• Post-negotiation

Page 15: Catalytic leader 2012

Tension

• Predictable at offer stage

• Predictable with counters

• Often grows as difference narrows

Page 16: Catalytic leader 2012

Asymmetrical Information

• Information affects aspiration

• Shared Information

• Discoverable information

• Secrets

• Leakage

Page 17: Catalytic leader 2012
Page 18: Catalytic leader 2012

Role #5 - Observer

• Don’t give away information or reactions – just watch.

• Watch for exaggerations, threats, offers and counter-offers.

• Notice questions particularly.

Page 19: Catalytic leader 2012
Page 20: Catalytic leader 2012

Role #1

Your mother says, “Go to the store. Bring me an orange. You come home without an orange and you’ll be in trouble.”

Page 21: Catalytic leader 2012
Page 22: Catalytic leader 2012

Role #2

Your mother says, “Go to the store. Bring me an orange. You come home without an orange and you’ll be in trouble.”

Page 23: Catalytic leader 2012
Page 24: Catalytic leader 2012

Role #3

Your mother says, “Go to the store and bring me an orange. Family is coming over tomorrow, I’m going to peel the orange and cut up the pulp for a fruit salad. Bring me an orange or you’ll be in trouble.”

Page 25: Catalytic leader 2012
Page 26: Catalytic leader 2012

Role #4

Your mother says, “Go to the store, bring me an orange. Family is coming over tomorrow. I’m going to peel the orange and grate the peel to flavor some orange bread I’m making. Bring me an orange or you’re in trouble.”

Page 27: Catalytic leader 2012
Page 28: Catalytic leader 2012

5 into 2

• No division of items

• No side deals

• Must divide all five between you

• Divide in 2 minutes or get nothing

• Item:

– 5 crisp $1,000 bills

Page 29: Catalytic leader 2012

5 into 2

• All the same rules

• Items:

– 2 tickets, great concert

– Designer jacket

– Glider flight over Grand Canyon

– Elegant fine French meal and wine for 2

– Martha Stewart cooks and cleans

Page 30: Catalytic leader 2012

Worker’s Comp Deal

Business Labor

Dr. Choice

Managed Care

Indexed Benefits

Safety Comm./ Inspectors

Page 31: Catalytic leader 2012

Worker’s Comp Deal

Business Labor

Dr. Choice Yes

Managed Care Yes

Indexed Benefits No

Safety Comm./ Inspectors

No

Page 32: Catalytic leader 2012

Worker’s Comp Deal

Business Labor

Dr. Choice Yes No

Managed Care Yes No

Indexed Benefits No Yes

Safety Comm./ Inspectors

No Yes

Page 33: Catalytic leader 2012

Worker’s Comp Deal

Business Labor

Dr. Choice Yes 1 No

Managed Care Yes 2 No

Indexed Benefits No 3 Yes

Safety Comm./ Inspectors

No 4 Yes

Page 34: Catalytic leader 2012

Worker’s Comp Deal

Business Labor

Dr. Choice Yes 1 No 3

Managed Care Yes 2 No 4

Indexed Benefits No 3 Yes 1

Safety Comm./ Inspectors

No 4 Yes 2

Page 35: Catalytic leader 2012

Shared Interests – valued alike

• An 800 phone number for workers’ rights.

• Better enforcement against companies without work comp.

• Informal dispute resolution method.

• Higher contribution from unsafe businesses.

Page 36: Catalytic leader 2012

Tools for Mutual Gain

• Interests before positions

• Priorities traded across differences

• Fair process norms

• Objective criteria

• Trust through authentic communication

Page 37: Catalytic leader 2012

“Strategic thinking requires the capacity to recognize shared,

complementary and conflicting interests.”

- Jeff Luke

“Catalytic Leadership”

Page 38: Catalytic leader 2012

Conflicting Interests

• Definition:– Valued alike, in opposition (money is the

most common

• Strategy– Use objective criteria to insure fair results

Page 39: Catalytic leader 2012

Complementary Interests

• Definition:– Elements valued differently

– Need at least two to link

• Strategy– discover, link, maximize

Page 40: Catalytic leader 2012

Shared Interests

• Definition:– Valued alike, good for both

• Strategy– Discover, maximize

– No need to link

Page 41: Catalytic leader 2012

Focus on Interests before Positions

• Interests = underlying motivations

– The answer to “why?”

• Positions = “yes or no” options

– The answer to “how much?”

• Focusing on interests induces problem solving because they are flexible and create satisfaction.

Page 42: Catalytic leader 2012

Invent Options for Mutual Gain

• Brainstorm method of advancing parties’ interests

• Invent first, then decide

• Link differences, priorities

• Maximize shared interests

Page 43: Catalytic leader 2012

Use Objective Criteria

• Learn marketplace

• Frame dispute as a joint search for fair standards

• Adjust standards for unique circumstances

• Open with an offer you can justify

Page 44: Catalytic leader 2012

Separate People from the Problem

Be unconditionally cooperative on process

– Good listening

– Fair characterizations

– Symbolic gestures

Page 45: Catalytic leader 2012

Separate Problem from the People

Be firm on fair outcomes

– Trade cooperation

– Reason, be open to reason

– Results need a fair, reasonable basis

Page 46: Catalytic leader 2012

Advantage Seeking comes from…

• High aspirationHigh aspiration

• Stingy asymmetrical concessionsStingy asymmetrical concessions

• Insistent counteroffersInsistent counteroffers

• Information manipulation & leveragingInformation manipulation & leveraging

Page 47: Catalytic leader 2012

The 7 Rules of Hard Bargaining

• Don’t make the first offer

• Don’t accept the first offer

• Don’t make the first concession

• Don’t concede the same size

Page 48: Catalytic leader 2012

The 7 Rules of Hard Bargaining

• Don’t concede at the same rate

• Ignore their deadlines, create your own

• Ask for something extra for agreement

Page 49: Catalytic leader 2012

Preferred Group Practices…

1. Identify and agree on process norms

7. Visual display of information, options, etc

2. Facilitation, hear everyone 8. Listening for threads of agreement

3. Create problem statement 9. Recasting solutions in search of broad consensus

4. Learn interests and priorities 10. Late commitments, broad consensus

5. Develop multiple options 11. Careful review of agreement

6. Link differences for joint gain 12. Celebrate the agreement

Page 50: Catalytic leader 2012

Problem Solving Negotiation

“Good luck and good negotiating,

Dave Landis

[email protected]