case report · 2019. 7. 31. · 2 international journal of vascular medicine figure 1: axial...

3
Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Vascular Medicine Volume 2010, Article ID 816937, 2 pages doi:10.1155/2010/816937 Case Report Distal Cervical Carotid Artery Dissection after Carotid Endarterectomy: A Complication of Indwelling Shunt Tomonori Tamaki, Node Yoji, and Norihiro Saito Department of Neurosurgery, Nagayama Hospital, Nippon Medical School, 1-7-1 Nagayama Tama-shi, Tokyo-to 206-8512, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Tomonori Tamaki, [email protected] Received 2 May 2010; Accepted 7 July 2010 Academic Editor: Erich Minar Copyright © 2010 Tomonori Tamaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The technical factors and surgical methods employed in carotid endarterectomy are controversial. In particular, whether or not to use an indwelling arterial shunt during carotid endarterectomy remains a source of conflict. We describe a rare case in which uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy was followed by distal internal carotid artery dissection and suggest that this devastating complication was due to intimal damage produced by the use of an indwelling arterial shunt. 1. Introduction The merits and demerits of using an arterial shunt during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have long been a topic that provokes discussion and controversy among cerebrovascular surgeons [14]. Potential complications of shunt placement include particulate embolization of atheromatous material, either distal to the shunt tip or through the shunt itself, as well as intimal damage that may lead to carotid dissection [14]. Although the latter possibility has been raised by numerous authors, we are aware of only one case in which distal carotid artery dissection was documented as being due to a shunt [5]. We present another rare case of internal carotid artery dissection caused by an indwelling arterial shunt. 2. Case Report A 72-year-old right-handed man was admitted to our institution. Four days before admission, he had experienced transient right hemiparesis for 20 minutes. On examina- tion, he was alert and fully oriented. Muscle power and sensation were normal. Computed tomography (CT) of the brain demonstrated cortical infarction in the left frontal lobe, Figure 1. He was started on medical management with antiplatelet therapy. After 13 days, angiography was performed and revealed severe stenosis of the left internal carotid artery (ICA) from the bulb and extending 5 cm distally. Other lesions were not detected (Figure 2(a)). At 35 days after the stroke, CEA was performed under general anesthesia as monitoring of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs). Patient’s hesitation for operation delayed CEA. Rou- tine CEA was performed, and the arteriotomy was repaired with a 7-0 prolene suture and patch angioplasty. During arterectomy, we used an indwelling shunt routinely (Pruitt- Inahara Carotid Shunt, LeMaitre Vascular). The shunt was easily advanced from the common carotid artery, to the internal carotid artery and no changes of SSEPs were noted at any time. The patient recovered from surgery without any neurological deficits. CT scanning of the brain 1 and 3 days after the operation showed no new lesions. 13 days after the operation, he developed the acute onset of expressive aphasia with inability to follow commands and worsening paresis of the right arm. Emergency CT revealed a new infarct in the white matter of the left frontal lobe, Figure 3. Angiography showed arterial dissection at the distal side of the carotid endarterectomy site (Figure 2(b)). 3. Discussion Use of an arterial shunt during CEA is a controversial subject. Arguments against universal shunting focus on the

Upload: others

Post on 09-Sep-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Report · 2019. 7. 31. · 2 International Journal of Vascular Medicine Figure 1: Axial Computed tomography of the brain demonstrated cortical infarction in the left frontal

Hindawi Publishing CorporationInternational Journal of Vascular MedicineVolume 2010, Article ID 816937, 2 pagesdoi:10.1155/2010/816937

Case Report

Distal Cervical Carotid Artery Dissection after CarotidEndarterectomy: A Complication of Indwelling Shunt

Tomonori Tamaki, Node Yoji, and Norihiro Saito

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagayama Hospital, Nippon Medical School, 1-7-1 Nagayama Tama-shi, Tokyo-to 206-8512, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Tomonori Tamaki, [email protected]

Received 2 May 2010; Accepted 7 July 2010

Academic Editor: Erich Minar

Copyright © 2010 Tomonori Tamaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.

The technical factors and surgical methods employed in carotid endarterectomy are controversial. In particular, whether or notto use an indwelling arterial shunt during carotid endarterectomy remains a source of conflict. We describe a rare case in whichuncomplicated carotid endarterectomy was followed by distal internal carotid artery dissection and suggest that this devastatingcomplication was due to intimal damage produced by the use of an indwelling arterial shunt.

1. Introduction

The merits and demerits of using an arterial shunt duringcarotid endarterectomy (CEA) have long been a topic thatprovokes discussion and controversy among cerebrovascularsurgeons [1–4]. Potential complications of shunt placementinclude particulate embolization of atheromatous material,either distal to the shunt tip or through the shunt itself, aswell as intimal damage that may lead to carotid dissection[1–4]. Although the latter possibility has been raised bynumerous authors, we are aware of only one case in whichdistal carotid artery dissection was documented as being dueto a shunt [5]. We present another rare case of internalcarotid artery dissection caused by an indwelling arterialshunt.

2. Case Report

A 72-year-old right-handed man was admitted to ourinstitution. Four days before admission, he had experiencedtransient right hemiparesis for 20 minutes. On examina-tion, he was alert and fully oriented. Muscle power andsensation were normal. Computed tomography (CT) of thebrain demonstrated cortical infarction in the left frontallobe, Figure 1. He was started on medical managementwith antiplatelet therapy. After 13 days, angiography was

performed and revealed severe stenosis of the left internalcarotid artery (ICA) from the bulb and extending 5 cmdistally. Other lesions were not detected (Figure 2(a)). At35 days after the stroke, CEA was performed under generalanesthesia as monitoring of somatosensory evoked potential(SSEPs). Patient’s hesitation for operation delayed CEA. Rou-tine CEA was performed, and the arteriotomy was repairedwith a 7-0 prolene suture and patch angioplasty. Duringarterectomy, we used an indwelling shunt routinely (Pruitt-Inahara Carotid Shunt, LeMaitre Vascular). The shunt waseasily advanced from the common carotid artery, to theinternal carotid artery and no changes of SSEPs were notedat any time. The patient recovered from surgery without anyneurological deficits. CT scanning of the brain 1 and 3 daysafter the operation showed no new lesions. 13 days after theoperation, he developed the acute onset of expressive aphasiawith inability to follow commands and worsening paresis ofthe right arm. Emergency CT revealed a new infarct in thewhite matter of the left frontal lobe, Figure 3. Angiographyshowed arterial dissection at the distal side of the carotidendarterectomy site (Figure 2(b)).

3. Discussion

Use of an arterial shunt during CEA is a controversialsubject. Arguments against universal shunting focus on the

Page 2: Case Report · 2019. 7. 31. · 2 International Journal of Vascular Medicine Figure 1: Axial Computed tomography of the brain demonstrated cortical infarction in the left frontal

2 International Journal of Vascular Medicine

Figure 1: Axial Computed tomography of the brain demonstratedcortical infarction in the left frontal lobe.

(a) (b)

Figure 2: (a) Preoperative left carotid angiogram showing severestenosis of the left internal carotid artery. (b) Postoperative leftcarotid angiogram showing dissecting formation (arrow) at theseveral centimeters distal to the operative site and improvement ofstenosis.

added morbidity that shunting may, citing evidence createthe following. (1) Stroke rates are higher in shunted thannonshunted patients (especially in shunted patients withoutany evidence of intraoperative ischemia), (2) shunts mayfail intraoperatively, (3) shunting can directly cause arterialinjury, and (4) good results are reported by surgeons whonever use shunts [1–4]. However, there are very few well-documented case reports of shunt failure. Cervical carotidartery dissection is often spontaneous or idiopathic, but it isalso associated with trauma to the carotid arteries and withcatheterization (as in percutaneous carotid angiography) [5–8]. The mechanism of injury in these latter cases is presumedto be an intimal tear that allows a new dissection plane tobe established in the arterial wall [5–7]. Intraoperative useof an indwelling shunt may cause direct injury to the arterialwall. In our case, catheter manipulation for angiography andshunt tube placement were suspected to be the cause(s) of

Figure 3: Axial Computed tomography of the brain 13 days afterthe carotid endarterectomy, demonstrated a new infarct in the whitematter of the left frontal lobe (arrow).

arterial wall injury. Considering the timing of onset of thepatient’s devastating neurological sequelae, the most likelycause of arterial dissection was shunt placement during CEA.We are aware of only one previous case in which distal carotidartery dissection was documented as being due to shunting[5]. Loftus reported a case of carotid artery dissection afterCEA, but his case differed from ours in two respects: (1)repeated carotid arterectomy was required for evacuation ofthrombus after CEA and, (2) the shunt used was not designedexclusively for CEA [5]. Our patient is the first reportedcase with carotid artery dissection after CEA caused by anindwelling arterial shunt.

References

[1] J. E. Bland and M. L. Lazar, “Carotid endarterectomy withoutshunt,” Neurosurgery, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 153–157, 1981.

[2] A. H. Boontje, “Carotid endarterectomy without a temporaryindwelling shunt: results and analysis of back pressure measure-ments,” Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 549–554, 1994.

[3] J. H. Halsey Jr., “Risks and benefits of shunting in carotidendarterectomy,” Stroke, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1583–1587, 1992.

[4] T. S. Riles, A. M. Imparato, G. R. Jacobowitz et al., “The causeof perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy,” Journal ofVascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 206–216, 1994.

[5] C. M. Loftus, G. N. Dyste, S. J. Reinarz, and W. L. Hingtgen,“Distal cervical carotid dissection after carotid endarterectomy:a complication of indwelling shunt?” Neurosurgery, vol. 19, no.3, pp. 441–445, 1986.

[6] P. Milner, R. Crowe, A. Loesch, S. Anglin, G. Burnstock, andJ. R. McEwan, “Neurocompensatory responses to balloon-catheter-induced injury of the rat carotid artery,” Journal ofVascular Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 1997.

[7] W. I. Schievink, “Spontaneous dissection of the carotid andvertebral arteries,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344,no. 12, pp. 898–906, 2001.

[8] N. R. Yu, R. T. Eberhardt, J. O. Menzoian, C. L. Urick, and J.D. Raffetto, “Vertebral artery dissection following intravascularcatheter placement: a case report and review of the literature,”Vascular Medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 199–203, 2004.

Page 3: Case Report · 2019. 7. 31. · 2 International Journal of Vascular Medicine Figure 1: Axial Computed tomography of the brain demonstrated cortical infarction in the left frontal

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com